Abstract
Endocrine-disrupting compounds are exogenous agents that interfere with the natural hormones of the body. Human biological monitoring is a powerful method for monitoring exposure to endocrine disrupting compounds. In this review, we describe human biological monitoring systems for different groups of endocrine disrupting compounds, polychlorinated biphenyls, brominated flame retardants, phthalates, alkylphenols, pesticides, metals, perfluronated compounds, parabens, ultraviolet filters, and organic solvents. The aspects discussed are origin to exposure, metabolism, matrices to analyse, analytical determination methods, determinants, and time trends.
Keywords: biomarkers of exposure, biomonitoring, blood, environmental contaminants, fetal, hormonal effects, mass spectrometry, quantitative analytical analysis, serum, urine
INTRODUCTION
Human biological monitoring (HBM) is a method of obtaining information regarding (i) exposure, (ii) effects or other responses, (iii) susceptibilities, or (iv) diseases. The information is obtained by analyzing compounds in human biological matrices, mainly blood or urine; however, other matrices are also used such as saliva, amniotic fluid, hair and semen, and so on. In this review, we will focus only on the HBM of exposure, where the compound itself or a metabolite is analyzed. HBM of exposure has many advantages compared with environmental monitoring, that is, to analyse the substances before becoming exposed through food, water, surfaces, or air. HBM measures a sum of the total internal exposure from all exposure routes. Furthermore, it is often easier to collect many samples using HBM than environmental monitoring. In addition, if the toxic mechanism of the compound is known, it is possible to take metabolic differences into account using HBM. It has been argued that the analytical methods used for HBM are difficult to develop due to the complicated biological matrices; however, new, sophisticated, analytical equipment has to a large extent facilitated the development of such methods.
For the past 5 decades, an increasing trend of awareness regarding xenobiotics and their endocrine-disrupting capabilities can be noted. An “endocrine-disrupting compound (EDC) is an exogenous agent that interferes with the synthesis, secretion, transport, binding, action, or elimination of natural hormones in the body that are responsible for the maintenance of homeostasis, reproduction, development, and/or behavior,” as defined by a USA EPA 1997 report. HBM has been beneficial in creating background information of endocrine disrupting compounds and is extensively applied to epidemiological studies of diseases due to occupational and environmental exposures. HBM serves as the basis for setting reference values, health-risk assessment, and management. The careful choice of biomarkers is required, keeping in mind their toxicokinetic stability, specificity, and reliability. Detailed information of guidance on biomonitoring, HBM requirements, study design, health-risk assessment, ethical requirements, and many more aspects can be found in the referred articles.1,2,3,4
The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists and the Deutsche Forshungsgemeinschaft are important organisations involved in setting of HBM reference values for occupational and environmental health. Several countries routinely perform large-scale general population surveys such as the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in the USA, the German Environmental Surveys in Germany, and the relatively newly formed consortium to perform human biomonitoring on a European scale in Europe. In this context, the importance of interlaboratory control programs should be emphasized to allow for the comparison of the results of different monitoring programs.
HBM has produced vital information that has led to control of many suspected EDCs, such as pesticides, heavy metals, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polyfluorinated compounds (PFCs), and brominated flame retardants (BFRs), which have concentrations that have shown declining trends in the general population globally. HBM data are usually interpreted by comparison with these reference values set by the responsible organizations. In the case of an absence of reference values, the results are compared with recommendations in the scientific literature.3 For example, the German Human Biomonitoring Commission recently published an update on the reference values and HBM values for a number of environmental pollutants in urine and blood matrices.5
This article focuses on groups of selected xenobiotic compounds that are suspected EDCs. An attempt has been made to review the information regarding the exposure of EDCs to humans, commonly followed analytical methods for their analysis and studies performed for monitoring determinants of these EDCs in humans.
POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS
PCBs have been used in industrial oils, plasticisers, pesticides and, as coolants, in electrical transformers. PCBs comprise 209 congeners and may differ with respect to their uptake and metabolism. They can be broadly classified into two groups: the coplanar or dioxin-like congeners and the non-coplanar or non-dioxin-like congeners. Generally, non-dioxin-like PCBs are more commonly found but less toxic than the dioxin-like PCBs. In spite of being banned in the late 1970s, these chemicals can still be found widely in the environment. Global observations have suggested that the major sources of PCB emissions are in developed countries.6 The main route of human exposure to PCBs, as many other contaminants, is food, especially fatty fish and meat.
The determination of PCB congeners has been performed in serum,7 plasma,8 breast milk,9 and hair,10 mainly by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) or GC-electron capture detection. Sample preparation techniques such as on-column degradation of lipids in serum samples have been used in many studies.7,11 Another method reported PCB extraction from plasma samples by n-hexane followed by clean up on a silica-gel column.8 Breast milk samples were subjected to mixed organic solvents extraction, followed by fractionation on activated carbon and further purified by adsorption chromatography on alumina.9 A detailed overview of several other analytical techniques and sample extraction methods can be found in the literature.12 Small amounts of biobanked samples can be accessed using analytical methods that only require a few hundred micro liters of sample. Concern has been expressed over the validity of PCB-153 serum levels without lipid adjustment of the values. However, high correlations between the fresh-weight and the lipid-adjusted values have recently been reported, alleviating the concern.13
The non-dioxin-like PCB congeners CB-138, CB-153, CB-170, and CB-180 have high correlations to other PCBs and known health effects; hence, they are usually determined to measure exposure in humans.14 Many epidemiological studies have related fish-consuming habits to elevated PCB concentrations, such as in the North American Inuit population15 and Greenland Inuits.16 A similar trend was observed in various Swedish fishermen cohort studies.17,18,19,20,21 Time-trend studies have revealed that PCB concentrations have decreased over the past decade from 1991 to 2001.22 A rapid decline of CB-153 was also observed in young Swedish males.23 Studies have demonstrated that CB-153 concentrations increase with increasing age, showing the older population with a higher body burden of PCBs.7,24 PCBs can easily pass from mother to fetus and the breast milk in turn may increase the body burden of the infants.25 Studies in mothers of southern Sweden showed serum levels of CB-153 in the range 0.1–11.4 ng ml−1.26 Pregnant women from Greenland showed elevated CB-153 levels compared with expecting mothers of East Europe.27,28 Interpopulation biomonitoring revealed that Greenland Inuits and Swedish fishermen population are highly exposed to PCBs through seafood intake compared with the representative Eastern European population.19 A total of 34 different PCBs were ubiquitously found in tested USA populations.14 A rising trend of PCB exposure in developing countries such as China is evident due to the growing number of e-waste recycling sites.10 Various studies have been published in the past several years evaluating the magnitude of e-waste recycling sites in China.29
BROMINATED FLAME RETARDANTS
BFRs are organobromine compounds used in a variety of textiles, thermoplastics, electric and electronic goods, building materials and vehicles due to their effective flame-retardant property. The flame-retardant products contain polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), polybrominated biphenyls, and tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA), which are known to be persistent and bioaccumulative. PBDEs constitute approximately 25% of all flame retardants, with 209 possible congeners, and are commercially produced as pentaBDE, octaBDE, and decaBDE. PBDEs and polybrominated biphenyls were listed among the six controlled compounds under the restriction of hazardous substances, and a ban has been imposed on the production and use of pentaBDE and octaBDE since 2003.30 These compounds are used as additives to the polymers and are not chemically bound. They, therefore, tend to leach out from the surface of the products. Restriction on BFRs has given rise to the production of novel BFRs: 1,2-bis (penta bromo diphenyl) ethane, commonly known as decabromodiphenyl ethane; 1,2-bis (2,4,6-tribromo phenoxy) ethane; 2-ethyl hexyl-2,3,4,5-tetrabromo benzoate; bis (2-ethylhexyl)-3,4,5,6-tetrabromo-phthalate, tetrabromo bisphenol A-bis (2,3-dibromopropyl ether) (TBBPA-DBPE), and hexachloro cyclopentadienyl dibromocyclo octane.31
Exposure of the general population to BFRs can occur through contaminated food, indoor dust, or air. BFRs have been measured in human milk, blood and serum samples,32 placenta33 blood plasma34, adipose tissue,35 and frozen brain samples.36 For pre- and postnatal exposure assessments, breast milk, cord blood, and maternal blood plasma are typically analysed.35 BFRs have mostly been analyzed through GC-MS. GC methods usually involve several extraction and derivatization steps;24,31,34,37,38 however, it is the preferred analytical technique due to its high specificity. Rarely, the liquid chromatography (LC)-MS/MS method has also been described for the analysis of TBBPA and hexabromocyclododecanes.39 Sample extraction methods such as solid phase extraction (SPE),37,38 liquid − liquid extraction,40 or organic-solvent extraction and purification on silica-gel column34 have been used and detected by GC-electron capture detection and GC-high-resolution MS.38,41
PBDE congeners BDE-28, BDE-47, BDE-99, BDE-100, BDE-153, and BDE-154 have been ubiquitously reported in USA populations.14 Studies have showed that fatty fish is an important pathway for BFR exposure.35,42,43 Thus, specific populations, such as the Inuits of the Arctic region and fishermen populations, which have high consumption of seafood, are vulnerable to BFR exposure. Time-trend studies in the Western countries demonstrate increasing levels of BFRs in humans in the past 2 to 3 decades.44 PBDE levels in USA populations are 10–100 times higher than most European countries; however, hexabromocyclododecanes levels observed in the USA were one to five times lower.45 PBDE levels observed in the Swedish study are comparable or lower than those found in other studies performed in Europe.24 PBDE levels observed in a maternal − fetal group in Japan were comparable to Sweden and lower than the USA.40 Hexabromocyclododecanes levels in human milk in the UK are comparable to Norway and Canada, but higher than those found in Sweden, the USA, Russia, and Japan.39 PBDEs measured in human tissues in China, especially in the occupationally exposed e-waste recycling workers, are in the intermediate to high range compared with the rest of the world.32 The highest PBDE levels (613 ng g−1 lipid in serum and breast milk) were found in the population from the province producing PBDEs, with BDE-209 being the predominant congener.32 A consistent detection of PBDEs and polybrominated biphenyls in human tissues of e-waste recycling workers and residents from recycling sites in China has been reported.10,46,47 Studies have shown that European children are being exposed to background levels of PBDEs. Breast milk and indoor dust are major sources of exposure for infants and toddlers to PBDEs. Infants exposure is estimated to be in the range of tens of ng kg−1 b.w. per day in Europe and hundreds of ng kg−1 b.w. per day in the USA43 PBDEs and TBBPA have been reported to be present in French mothers, indicating a risk of BFR exposure to newborns.48 Several studies of PBDEs and TBBPA in maternal and umbilical serum, maternal adipose tissue, breast milk, maternal blood, and umbilical cord blood have been reported for the exposure assessment of foetuses and newborns to BFRs.40,48 Very few HBM studies have been conducted on the class of the novel BFRs. These BFRs have been detected in human milk and placenta samples in some studies, but most did not report any detection or very low levels in human samples.31
PHTHALATES
Phthalates are the most widely used plasticisers and have a varied range of applications from industrial to domestic household products. Apart from occupational exposure, the known sources of exposure to phthalates are air, water, dust, food, consumer products, and personal care products. Di (2-ethyl-hexyl) phthalate (DEHP) along with dibutyl phthalate, and benzyl butyl phthalate have been banned in children's toys by the European Union since 1999. However, many other phthalates are still commonly used, which make them one of the most widely found compounds in most of the matrices. Phthalates enter the human body through food, inhalation, or dermal uptake. Phthalates are not known to accumulate in the body but rapidly metabolise and are excreted in urine and faeces. They are metabolised to their respective monoesters, which in turn can undergo oxidation reactions and form conjugates with glucuronic acid.49,50
Several analytical methods are presented in the literature for the determination of phthalates, with GC-MS51,52 and LC-MS/LC-MS-MS/tandem techniques52,53,54 being the most popular. Sample preparation techniques such as liquid − liquid extraction, followed by pressurised liquid extraction52 or manual or automated SPE55,56 have been applied. Human urine,54,55 blood,56 semen,54,56 breast milk,52 and amniotic fluid57 have been applied for HBM of phthalates in various studies. However, to avoid sample contamination, urine has been the preferred matrix for phthalate exposure assessment because of the lack of lipase activity and higher levels. Nevertheless, oxidative metabolites can be monitored in serum. Glucuronidase treatment is normally performed to release glucuronic acid conjugation.
Extensive reviews have been published regarding HBM of phthalates and metabolism routes in humans.54,58,59 In adults, the highest levels are usually found for monoethyl phthalate,54,60 while levels of monobenzyl phthalate appear to be low. The levels of mono-n-butyl phthalate are often between monoethyl phthalate and monobenzyl phthalate. The sum of DEHP metabolites is also rather high. The levels found are rather similar in different countries. Infants are considered prone to phthalate exposure due to their dependence on formulated food and breast milk, ingestion of dust, and so on, with the most concern expressed over those receiving intensive medical care. An investigation of the biomonitoring of phthalates in infant nutrition and reproductive health explains that infants should be considered at higher risk for DEHP exposure and the potential health hazards involved.61 The phthalate metabolite levels in infants are at least as high as in adults.62 Exposure to the fetus is considered to be of special relevance for the development of disease later in life. Thus, phthalate metabolite monitoring in pregnant mothers has been performed to monitor fetal exposure.57,62 A more direct method is the analysis of amniotic fluid samples, which has been performed in 300 biobanked samples. The analysis showed detectable levels of DEHP metabolite: mono (2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl) phthalate (5cx-MEPP) and DiNP metabolite: mono (4-methyl-7-carboxyheptyl) phthalate (7cx-MMeHP).57 The DEHP metabolite levels decreased, while those of DiNP increased during the years 1980–1996.
In spite of current increased awareness, unfortunate incidents such as use of phthalates as a clouding agent in food and beverages has recently been reported,63 posing a serious threat to the general population.
ALKYLPHENOLS
Bisphenol A (BPA) is a widespread alkylphenol used as a monomer in the production of polycarbonate plastic and epoxy resins used in the lining of metal cans and food containers, baby bottles, toys, plastic containers, water pipes, sports equipment, medical equipment, dental applications, and many other consumer products. 4-nonylphenol (NP) and 4-octylphenol (OP) are other important APs used as intermediates to produce alkylphenol ethoxylates. Alkylphenol ethoxylates are widely used in surfactants, emulsifiers, detergents, household cleaners, and personal care products and in paper, textile, leather, and agrochemical industries. BPA is one of the most highly produced EDCs on a global scale, with expected continued growth in future.64 Humans are exposed to APs mainly through the intake of contaminated food and drinking water. Repetitive usage of polycarbonate products subjected to heat or varied pH conditions causes hydrolysis of ester bonds resulting in leaching of APs into foods and beverages. The current tolerable daily intake for BPA is 0.05 mg kg−1 b.w. per day. Recently, the European Commission made a significant decision to restrict the use of BPA in plastic baby bottles in the European Union.65 However, infant food formulations and breast milk are still important BPA sources of concern. Glucuronidation and sulphation of APs is the main route of metabolism in humans, and the product is mostly excreted within 24 h. Unconjugated BPA and some other discovered metabolites are considered to be the biologically active form.66
For HBM, BPA has been measured in urine, serum, blood, breast milk, amniotic fluid, semen, placental tissue, follicular fluid, and umbilical cord blood.67 NPs and OPs have been measured in plasma, urine, breast milk, and serum.68 However, it should be emphasised that urine is preferable due to the higher levels and the high risk of contamination. Analytical techniques applied for measuring APs in humans are GC-MS, LC-MS/MS, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Detailed information regarding analytical techniques with respect to various biological matrices can be found in the referred article.68 Although enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay is a cheaper option, its accuracy and precision is questionable. The sample is treated with the glucuronidase/sulphatase enzyme, and SPE extraction is often preferred. Other extraction techniques such as liquid − liquid extraction, stir bar sorptive extraction, and solid phase microextraction have also been applied.68
A number of reviews on HBM studies on BPA have been published in the past decade. Most exposure studies showed mean urinary BPA concentrations below 3 μg l−1.69 Although higher concentrations of BPA in blood and urine have been reported, these values were later considered inconsistent with other available data and toxicokinetic studies.69 A report suggests that BPA levels in developed countries are 400–2000 times below lifetime daily intake levels,64 with a lack of information from developing countries.67 The average urinary BPA reported in the USA (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) and Canada showed that children and youngsters had higher levels than adults.14,70 Urinary BPA levels of American and European pregnant women ranged from 1 to 4.5 ng ml−1.71 BPA is known to pass the maternal-fetal placental barrier. Maternal and fetal serum, cord blood, amniotic fluid, and placental determination of BPA suggest risk of fetal exposure to BPA.67 In addition, infants are considered particularly vulnerable to exposure due to the presence of BPA in breast milk. At higher risk are neonates receiving intensive medical care.72 Lately, different views have been expressed over food being considered the only route of BPA exposure. A report showed lower estimates of BPA levels in food than from HBM data, indicating the significance of other exposure sources.73
NP and OP were detected in more than 50% of the urine samples obtained from the USA study population.74,75 The consumption of foods such as seafood, fish oil, and cooking oils are suggested to cause dietary exposure to NPs and OPs.76,77 NPs in tissue samples of Italy were reported to be two times higher than in Spanish and Finnish studies and three times higher than in Switzerland78 and levels in Spain were comparable to other European studies.79 Similar NP levels in Taiwan region were higher than most European and Japanese studies.76 In general, there is a scarcity of data on HBM of NP and OP compared with the available data on BPA. More research needs to be directed on isomer determination, as many studies have determined exposure to technical mixtures of OPs and NPs.
PESTICIDES
Numerous pesticides are recognized for their endocrine-disrupting behavior. A compiled list of endocrine-disruptor pesticides has been recently published.80 Several of these compounds have been banned in many countries; however, they can still be found in the environment due to their long half-lives or the continued usage by some countries. Pesticides can be broadly classified as organochlorines (OCs), organophosphates (OPs), carbamates, and pyrethroids. OCs, such as 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(4-chlorophenyl)ethane (DDT), endosulfan, heptachlor, and aldrin; OPs, such as malathion, chlorpyrifos, diazinon, dichlorvos, and fenitrothion; carbamates, such as aldicarb, carbaryl, and carbofuran; and pyrethroids, such as cypermethrin and deltamethrin are well known for their endocrine-disrupting properties. A significant focus has also been on the fact that chemicals can interact with other chemicals in a mixture, leading to toxicity change due to synergism and antagonism effects modifying the toxicokinetic properties of the compounds. The interactions of chemical mixtures at high doses are well known; however, there is a need to investigate the potential reactions of chemicals at low doses similar to current human exposure levels.81
Populations working in close contact with pesticides as well as the general public through the intake of contaminated food and drinks, domestic use, treatment of public places with pesticides for disease control or living in close proximities to agricultural fields bear the risk of potential exposure. Dermal exposure is considered a significant occupational exposure route for pesticide entry in humans. Human contact of pesticides can be monitored by measuring pesticides or the metabolite levels in blood, serum, urine, breast milk, and hair samples. Measurements have also been performed in umbilical cord blood and amniotic fluid samples to study foetal exposure to pesticides. OCs are usually determined in lipid-rich matrices as they are lipophilic and tend to accumulate in body fat. However, non-persistent pesticides are excreted rapidly and are hence determined as the parent compound and metabolites in urine.82 OPs join with the cholinesterase enzyme and inhibit the activity of enzyme causing elevated levels of acetylcholine, which serves as indicator of presence of high levels of OPs. However, acetylcholine analysis in blood does not serve as a biomarker for low-level exposure for a longer time.83,84 OPs and carbamates have similar working mechanism as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. Polar compounds and metabolites are usually excreted through urine, and the less polar ones conjugate with glucuronide or sulphate to increase their polarity to facilitate excretion.82 Hence, the samples are usually pretreated with glucuronide/sulphatase enzyme for deconjugation, and the sample is extracted by SPE. Some studies have described on-column degradation of lipids along with SPE for the determination of OCs in lipid-rich matrices.7,11 The obtained concentration values are often adjusted for creatinine (in the case of urine) or lipids (in the case of blood or other lipid-rich matrices) concentrations. SPE is a widely applied sample extraction method because most biological samples are in the liquid phase, and the obtained limit of detection and recoveries are substantially better compared with other extraction methods.85 Metabolites that tend to volatilize under GC conditions are determined using GC-MS. Most pesticide metabolites are less volatile and thermolabile; hence, LC-MS is the preferred technique for analysis.85 Extensive reviews discussing pesticide analysis in biological samples are available in the literature.82,85,86,87
ORGANOCHLORINES
Heptachlor epoxide, oxychlordane, trans-nonachlor, 1,1- dichloro-2,2-bis (p-chlorophenyl)-ethylene (p, p’-DDE), 1,1,1-trichloro -2,2-bis (4-chlorophenyl) ethane (p, p’-DDT), dieldrin, and mirex are the most commonly found OCs in humans, and p, p’-DDE is ubiquitous in the general population.88 Among 19 regions/countries compared for p, p’-DDE and p, p’-DDT levels in human milk samples, Poland and Sweden showed the lowest concentrations, and China generally showed very high concentrations due to a late production ban and continued use of DDT in agriculture and disease control.89 A review reported p, p’-DDE and p, p’-DDT concentrations in maternal and foetal blood to be lower than 500 ng−1 lipid, except in developing countries.90 In a determination of other OCs in maternal and cord blood, β-HCH, hexachlorobenzene (HCB), trans-nonachlor and oxychlordane showed levels below 50 ng g−1 lipid, except Mexico.90 In China, HCB levels in adipose tissue were comparable to levels in Japan and slightly higher than the USA; however, HCB levels in human milk samples were relatively higher than in the USA and other Asian countries.91 A recent review documented a high exposure of Kenyan mothers to OCs especially DDT, dieldrin and lindane.92 The mean DDT concentration in breast milk in South Africa was 15.83 mg kg−1, and the mean DDE levels in breast milk and blood samples of Ghana were 490 μg kg−1 fat and 380 μg kg−1, respectively.92 Extensive studies on Swedish fisherman community showed exposure to p, p’- DDE due to contaminated fish consumption.7,11,93,94 Large-scale epidemiologic studies conducted on pregnant women showed high serum levels of p, p’-DDE in Ukrainian mothers compared with Greenland Inuit mothers and Polish mothers.27,28 HBM studies performed in Poland, Ukraine, Greenland, and Sweden revealed greater than 10-fold variations in the median serum p, p’- DDE concentration.95 Compared with previous studies, a 15-fold decrease in serum DDT levels was observed in the USA population; however, detection occurred in nearly in all samples.96 The age group 12–19 years had lower geometric mean serum levels than higher age groups. A similar trend was observed for heptachlor epoxide, transnonachlor, and oxychlordane.96 Investigations in Sweden also reported a continually decreasing trend, with 30% of samples having concentrations below the detection limit.23
ORGANOPHOSPHATES CARBAMATES, AND PYRETHROIDS
Metabolites of dialkylphosphates (DAPs) (dimethylphosphate, dimethylthiophosphate, dimethyldithiophosphate, diethylphosphate, diethylthiophosphate, and diethyldithiophosphate) are most commonly measured as OP metabolites.97 The mean total DAP levels found in European studies were higher than those found in the USA.98 Children in the USA generally showed higher levels of DAP metabolites than adults.96,97 The 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol (TCPY) metabolite was detected in more than 90% of children's urine samples in a number of USA HBM studies.99 Detectable levels of DAPs have been reported in the biological samples of children and pregnant women.98 Ethylene bisdithiocarbamates, such as maneb, mancozeb, and ziram, are metabolised into very polar compounds, such as ethylenethiourea.82 Commonly measured metabolites of carbamates-propoxur, carbaryl, and carbofuran are 2-isopropoxyphenol, 1-naphthol (1-NAP), and carbofuranphenol, respectively.97 Permethrin, cyfluthrin, cypermethrin, and deltamethrin are commonly used pyrethroids. The long-term effects of pyrethroids are not known; however, neurological and endocrine-disrupting effects are the most commonly studied effects with regard to long-term exposure.100 Pyrethroids are immediately hydrolysed in humans to form the metabolites 3-phenoxybenzoic acid (3-PBA), cis- and trans-(3-2, 2 dichlorvinyl)-2,2 dimethylcyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (cis-trans-DCCA), 4-fluoro-3-phenoxybenzolic acid (F-PBA), and 3-(2,2-Dibromovinyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid, which are excreted in urine. The carbaryl metabolite 1-NAP showed higher levels in the older population than in the younger ones.97 In two observational studies performed in the USA, 3-PBA was detected in more than 60% of children's urine samples.99 Studies found high frequencies of pyrethroids in the tested USA population, and the levels were higher than those found in Germany.101
METALS
Arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), and mercury (Hg) are among the metals suspected of possessing carcinogenic and endocrine-disrupting effects and are known to cause neurobehavioral and reproductive disorders.102,103 Large quantities of metals are released during mining and smelting processes. Volcanic eruptions, forest fires, weathering of rocks, burning of fossil fuels, waste incineration, soil erosion due to deforestation, agriculture, manufacture of mercury-containing medical equipment and electronics are some of the sources of metal released into the environment. Seafood is known to accumulate elevated metal levels. The inorganic forms of As are highly toxic, and the trivalent form is the most toxic. High concentrations of As in drinking water have been reported in Bangladesh, India, and China for some time, and many new reports are observed from Afghanistan, Pakistan, Taiwan region, Argentina, Mexico, and many other countries.104,105,106,107 Most of the population is ubiquitously exposed to As at levels which may not cause adverse effects.108 Smoking is considered an important pathway of Cd exposure due to uptake of Cd by the tobacco plantation. Inorganic mercury released into the environment is methylated, which bioaccumulates in the tissues of organisms. Nearly, 70% of blood Hg is found in the organic form due to consumption of contaminated fish, especially carnivorous fish.109 Methylmercury (MeHg) can form thiol complexes with the cysteine, which increases its mobility across cell membranes.110 Hg in the form of vapour is highly diffusible and can readily pass the blood-brain and placental barriers.110 Leaded gasoline and paints have contributed largely toward lead exposure. Mixtures of toxic metals are reported to project supraadditive effects.102 Toxicity studies of As, Cd, and Pb coexposure showed modest to severe adverse effects compared with single element exposure.111
Exposure is monitored by measuring levels of metals in urine, blood, hair, and nails.106 A major route of As excretion from the human body is through urine, accounting for nearly 60%-70% of the dose. The As blood level is considered a nonspecific biomarker, as it has a very short half-life.108 Up to 40%-60% of inhaled Cd reaches the circulatory system via the lungs, whereas 5%-10% of ingested Cd is absorbed, which may lead to toxicity due to continual accumulation in a long-term exposure.112 Blood Cd levels mainly reflect current exposure, and urinary Cd levels reflect the body burden.113 A good correlation between blood-Cd and urine-Cd has been demonstrated, and either biomarker can be used for Cd estimations in biomonitoring.114 The concentration of total Hg in blood is measured to study the general population exposure, whereas inorganic Hg is measured in urine to study occupational exposure. Lead concentration in whole blood is the primary biomarker of lead exposure. Techniques such as atomic absorption spectrometry, atomic fluorescence spectroscopy, and atomic emission spectrometry have been conventionally applied as individual techniques due to their simplicity and cost-effectiveness. Similarly, these techniques have been coupled to GC, LC, and capillary electrophoresis for enhanced element separation.115 Owing to the demand of extremely low detection limits, high specificity and sensitivity, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry has lately been widely applied in biological samples for single- or multielement analysis.115,116 Urine and blood samples are acid-treated, usually with nitric acid, incubated and diluted with deionised water prior to analysis. Nail and hair samples are usually washed with appropriate solutions, digested with nitric acid, perchloric acid, or tetramethylammonium hydroxide followed by incubation for several hours.
Elevated urinary As levels have been reported from India, Bangladesh, and Taiwan region due to contaminated drinking water.104,105 Background urinary As levels and its metabolites in the USA and Europe are substantially lower (10 μg l−1) compared with the Asian continent.105,117 The CDC fourth national report stated a mean total urinary As of 8.2 μg g−1 creatinine in the USA population.118 Analysis of nails of the general population revealed high As levels in the regions affected by contaminated drinking water in Mexico and Taiwan region.119 Due to traditional food consumption, elevated As levels were reported in the Canadian Inuits.120 A study in China reported high urinary As levels in the population of metal-exposed regions due to contaminated drinking water and indoor burning of metal-contaminated coal.121,122 Studies have suggested that 50% of As intake of the South American population is due to contaminated food sources.123 An alarmingly high exposure to As has been reported in the monitored children and maternal-foetal cohort in South America.123 The background Cd levels among nonexposed general population in blood is less than 0.5 μg l−1; in urine, it is less than 0.5 μg g−1 creatinine.112 Cd levels increase with age.113 Swedish studies have reported women to have higher Cd levels due to general iron depletion.113 Studies have showed that a group vulnerable to Cd exposure is the population having a high vegetarian diet or a high intake of shellfish.114 In China, compared with a control group, higher urinary Cd levels were reported in people consuming rice from contaminated fields and domestic usage of metal-containing coal.121 In the USA, adult women showed higher blood levels of Hg than young children; among children, girls had higher levels than boys.96 It is evident that fish and shellfish consumption causes elevated Hg levels.124,125,126 Studies have shown that the population of high fish-consuming regions of Canada and the USA had higher Hg levels than other countries, and South American countries are at greater risk of Hg exposure due to traditional fish consumption and gold-mining activities.124 Arctic studies report decreasing Hg levels in Canadian Inuits compared with older studies.127,128 Inuit mothers of Arctic Canada had a blood Hg level three times higher than non-Aboriginal mothers.128 Active involvement in gold-mining activities, contaminated fish consumption, and use of contaminated cosmetic products has led to an elevated body burden of Hg in Africa.92 Numerous reviews have discussed Hg exposure due to gold mining in the Amazonian region, mainly in Brazil.109,126 The total Hg levels in the hair of the Brazilian Amazonian population are higher than other South American populations.129 Since the rapid industrial growth in Asia, increasing Hg levels are being reported.130,131 A substantial decrease in blood lead levels (BLLs) is evident in the Western countries in the past 2 decades due to the use of unleaded gasoline and lead-free paints. Studies have shown decreased Pb levels in the USA population in the past 30 years.96,132 BLL increased gradually with age and in immigrant USA populations living in urban areas; children especially showed higher BLL.96,133 Several studies have shown that the Mexican population bears a higher risk of lead exposure due to traditional practices, housing in urban settings, and usage of leaded paints and lead-laced ceramics and pots.133,134 Similar trends were observed in HBM studies in Canada.70 Compared with other parts of the world, Brazil reported high BLL, with a major contribution to exposure coming from battery and recycling plants.135 Moderately high BLL were observed in Canadian and Greenland Inuit mothers, and lead exposure was mainly from shots used in hunting for traditional food.127 The current exposure limit of 100 μg l−1 BLL is considered excessive for vulnerable groups, such as infants and children, due to their higher gastrointestinal absorption and less effective excretion.136 The average BLLs of <20 μg l−1 in Japanese children are one of the lowest reported in the world.137 Recent reports from China suggest decreasing trends of BLL and prevalence of lead poisoning in children; however, the levels are still high compared with developed Western countries.138 Significant corelations between BLL and breast milk levels are evident; however, the reported low lead levels in milk appear to pose the least risk to infants.139 Mean BLL in battery manufacturing and recycling plant workers in developing countries was 470 μg l−1 and 640 μg l−1, respectively, which is substantially higher than similar profession workers in the USA and UK.140
POLYFLUORINATED COMPOUNDS
PFCs have exceptional physicochemical properties to make the surfaces of substances water and oil resistant. PFCs are extensively used in the surface coatings of cooking pans, food containers, electronic devices, cosmetics, surfactants, and fire-fighting foams. The PFCs of concern are perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) because they are persistent and found in humans and the environment. PFOS, its salts and perfluorooctane sulfonyl fluoride (PFOS-F) have been added to the Stockholm Convention list of the new persistent organic pollutants since 2009.141 PFOS and PFOA have been replaced by other PFCs such as perfluorononanic acid, perfluorodecanic acid, and perfluoroundecanoic acid, and these new compounds start to show increasing levels in humans.142 Other perfluoroalkyl acids reported in humans are perfluorooctane sulfonamide (PFOSA), 2-(N-methyl-perfluorooctane sulfonamido) acetic acid (Me-PFOSA-AcOH), 2-(N-ethylperfluorooctane sulfonamido) acetic acid (Et-PFOSA-AcOH or PFOSAA), perfluorododecanoic acid, perfluoropentanoic acid, perfluorohexanoic acid, and perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS).143
Human exposure to PFCs can occur via contaminated indoor and ambient air, drinking water, and food.144 PFCs enter food via food packaging, food preparation in PFC-containing cooking utensils, and environmental contamination of food-producing animals and plants.145 The tolerable daily intake set by European Food Safety Authority is 150 ng kg−1 b.w. per day for PFOS and 1500 ng kg−1 b.w. per day for PFOA.146 Internal exposure of PFCs in humans has been measured in blood serum142,147 amniotic fluid57 plasma, liver, cord blood, breast milk, and seminal plasma.148 PFCs are known to form conjugates with proteins in blood; hence, the PFC presence in maternal breast milk is limited.144 LC-MS/MS has become a standard method for PFC analysis adopted by most laboratories.149 Sample preparation methods follow treatment of serum samples with enzyme and organic solvents for the removal of proteins and supernatant injected in LC-MS/MS system.142 A similar method was also applied for PFC analysis in amniotic fluid samples.57 One method used protein precipitation of samples followed by UPLC-MS/MS technique for the high throughput analysis of cord blood samples.150 Sample extraction with ion-pairing liquid extraction, liquid extraction without ion pairing, SPE, or direct injection of samples has also been described.151
Higher PFOS levels have been reported in Canada, the United States, and Europe compared with Asia and the Southern Hemisphere.144,151 Monitoring of PFOA in the USA population revealed that, except for the occupationally exposed fraction, the PFOA levels above background were found only in the population from Minnesota and West Virginia/Ohio, relating it to a contaminated water supply.152 Perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS), perfluorononanic acid, PFOA, and PFOS were detected ubiquitously in the USA population.14 In addition, PFCs measured in the general population from Japan, Denmark, and Canada demonstrated widespread PFC presence.153 Many studies have found no indication of age-related exposure; however, a few studies in Germany, the United States and Australia observed PFOS and PFOA to be higher in the older population.144 Dietary exposure to PFOS and PFOA has been suggested as a significant exposure pathway.144 PFC levels reported in Greenland Inuits were among the highest due to traditional fatty foods.142 The newly introduced PFC levels in the Inuits from the same study were comparable to Europe and the USA determination of PFCs in pregnant women's cord blood and amniotic fluid has been performed to assess foetal exposure.57,148,150 Since the voluntary termination of PFOS production by many developed countries, declining trends have been observed generally;142 however, on the contrary, a marked increase of PFOS levels is observable in developing countries. Time-trend studies from the past 2 decades exhibited variation, with an increasing trend in Norway, a limited increase in Denmark, and a decreasing trend in Germany.57 A considerable increase in PFOS and PFOA levels was observed in the past 15 years in China.144,154
PARABENS
Parabens are a class of suspected weak endocrine-disruptor chemicals possessing antimicrobial properties. Parabens are used widely in pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and personal care products. Common parabens are comprised of methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, iso-propyl, n-butyl, and iso-butylparaben. Detection of these compounds in breast tumor cells155 raised concern over the safety of these compounds, suspecting them to be carcinogenic. The EU allows a maximum of 0.4% of a single ester and 0.8% in a mixture of esters in cosmetic products (Council Directive 76/768/EEC on cosmetic products).27
Human exposure to parabens is caused via absorption through skin or ingestion or by the use of products containing parabens. There is a limited understanding of the toxicokinetics of parabens in humans. Parabens are primarily metabolised by humans into p-hydroxybenzoic acid and further form glucuronide and sulphate conjugates, which are excreted in urine. Parabens absorbed through skin can be incompletely metabolised, with part of the compound remaining unchanged.155 p-hydroxybenzoic acid is considered a nonspecific biomarker for paraben determination;156 hence, it is recommended to determine free parabens in addition to all conjugated urinary species as valid biomarkers. Determination of parabens in humans has been reported in urine,157,158 serum,159,160 seminal plasma,160 and breast tumor cells.155 The most common technique of choice for the determination of parabens is LC-MS/MS.156,160 The sample is subject to an initial treatment with β-glucuronidase/sulphatase, then incubation and extraction by manual or online SPE technique.156,160
There are a limited number of studies available on human exposure to parabens. A study measured urinary parabens in American adults reporting methyl and n-propyl parabens in more than 96% of the samples.157 In the USA population, adolescent and adult women showed higher urinary parabens levels than males, indicating the use of cosmetics as major exposure pathway.156 It is suggested that different ingredients in cosmetics may form interactive mixtures and increase uptake of parabens as well as other compounds.161 Increased urinary levels of butylparaben were reported after the topical application of butylparaben containing personal products on male subjects.158 The determination of parabens in urine, serum, and seminal plasma samples from 60 healthy Danish men showed ubiquitous presence of most of the parabens with significant correlations between all the matrices.160 The studied Danish population had two and a half-fold lower urinary parabens levels than the USA population.160 More metabolism information is required to relate the determined biomarkers with exposure.
ULTRAVIOLET FILTERS
Ultraviolet (UV) filters are commonly used in sunscreen products, cosmetics, and personal care products either to provide protection to consumers or to prevent the degradation of the products by UV exposure. UV filters are also used in plastics and other household materials to prevent decolouring. Animal studies suggest that common chemical UV filters such as benzophenones (BP2 and BP3), 4-methylbenzylidene-camphor, and octyl-methoxycinnamate possess endocrine-disrupting potential.162,163 However, there is limited knowledge regarding their influence on humans, which is debated.164 Other commonly found chemical UV filters are 2-cyano-3,3-diphenyl acrylic acid, 3-benzylidene camphor, homosalate, 2-ethylhexyl 4-dimethylaminobenzoate (OD-PABA), and 4-aminobenzoic acid (PABA).165 The European Union Cosmetics directive permits 26 UV filters for commercial use.27
UV filters have been measured in human plasma,166 urine,166 and breast milk.167 Occasional determinations of UV filters have also been performed in matrices such as human feces and semen.168 Analytical technique commonly described for the determination of UV filters in biological samples is HPLC with UV166 or MS detection.167,169 The GC-MS technique has also been reported167 but usually requires extensive sample preparation. The typical sample preparation method for urine samples follows enzymatic hydrolysis by b-glucuronidase at controlled pH and incubation for several hours followed by SPE.168 Another described method involves the addition of an organic solvent to the incubated sample, centrifugation, and evaporation of the separated organic phase followed by redissolving in MeOH, which is injected into the system.169 Plasma, serum, or breast milk samples are mixed with organic solvents and centrifuged to precipitate proteins prior to hydrolysis. Detailed reviews of sample preparation and analytical techniques for UV filter analyses have been published recently.168,170
BP3 was detected in 96.8% of urine samples in the USA population, which was related to the use of personal care products, explaining the gender and racial/ethnical difference of exposure levels.171 Whole-body application of UV filters in experimental studies in Denmark and Sweden reported BP3, 4-methylbenzylidene-camphor, and octyl-methoxycinnamate in plasma and urine samples.165 Studies on pregnant women/mother-child cohort in the USA, France, and Switzerland reported a number of UV filters in urine and breast milk samples, suggesting exposure to fetuses and infants at early developmental stages.165,172,173 No correlations were found between the UV filters in the milk samples of Swiss mothers and age, body mass index, or eating habits.167
ORGANIC SOLVENTS
Organic solvents are volatile organic compounds found in urbanised areas. Commonly used industrial solvents include chlorinated solvents, petroleum hydrocarbons, and oxygenated hydrocarbons. Dichloromethane, chloroform, and perchloroethylene are used for degreasing in industries and commonly used in the dry cleaning of clothes and are suspected to have carcinogenic, teratogenic, and mutagenic effects on humans.174 Solvents such as ethylene glycol ethers, toluene, xylene, and styrene are used in paint industry, adhesives, resins, and plastics. They are suspected to bind to estrogen receptors, cause menstrual disorders, and interfere with reproductive hormones in humans.163 Solvents such as toluene are popularly used among nail technicians, which are linked to causing endocrine disruption.175 Benzene and formaldehyde are classified as human carcinogens by the World Health Organization, and toluene, xylene, and ethylbenzene are mentioned as affecting human health causing respiratory and neurological effects by the USA EPA.176 Most organic solvents can pass the placental-fetal barrier, which could be hazardous to the developing fetus. Among other occupations, paint industry workers, petrochemical and gas station workers, tannery and footwear workers, chemical factory workers, dry cleaners, and nail-saloon workers can be considered at high risk to organic solvents exposure.
Exposure to cigarette smoke, traffic exhaust, and contaminated air are major sources of exposure to organic solvents other than occupational exposure. Organic solvents have been measured in human alveolar air,177 blood,177,178,179 and urine.178,179,180,181 Analysis of unmodified solvents in urine is regarded as specific biomarkers of exposure and correlate to occupational exposure.178,182 GC has been commonly applied for determination of organic solvents in biological samples with detectors, such as a flameionization detector178,181 and MS.183,184 LC-MS/MS is also efficiently applied for determination of organic solvents after filtration and acidification of urine samples.180 The majority of sample extraction methods described for GC-MS analysis of blood and urine samples is headspace-solid phase microextraction.179,182,184 Automatic headspace samplers have also been employed to directly inject headspace gases into GC-MS systems.183 Different techniques for exhaled air sampling are described in the literature.185
Ethylbenzene, methyl-tert-butyl-ether, toluene, and xylene were found ubiquitously in blood samples in the U.S. population.14 Urinary styrene metabolites mandelic acid and phenylglyoxylic acid were detected widely in a study performed in the Italian population.180 Benzene, toluene, and xylene were determined in end-exhaled air samples of 101 primary school children exposed to indoor cigarette smoke and vehicle smoke in Turkey.185 A study performed on drycleaners detected dichloromethane, chloroform, and tetrachloroethene ubiquitously in urine samples, showing an increasing trend of solvents with an increased length of work shift.174 Toluene was reported in alveolar air, blood, and urine of male workers from a chemical factory.177 Dermal exposure study in workers of a petrochemical plant detected benzene in all the samples and toluene in 93% of samples.181 In Italy, a decreasing trend was observed in the levels of organic solvents in the paint industry workers in the past 2 decades due to usage of safety equipment and following of regulations.184 Occupational exposure studies in paint factory and footwear factory workers reported the presence of toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene in urine and blood samples showing good correlation between volatile organic compounds (VOCs) present in air, blood, urine and urinary metabolites in samples.186 The mean urinary levels of toluene biomarker hippuric acid in Mexican tannery workers were three times lower than those found in a Chinese shoe factory.187
QUESTIONS FROM THE PANEL
Q1: How to select new exposures for monitoring?
A1: In the HBM of EDCs, the scientific society often concentrates on a limited number of compounds at one time. The methods for monitoring metals such as lead and mercury were developed early. After the discovery in the 1960s of high levels PCB and other persistent organic pollutants in wildlife marine animals,188 HBM of these compounds was performed for many years. Lately, scientists have focused on other compounds such as PBDEs, PFCs, phthalates, and bisphenol A. However, development of HBM methods for new compounds is rarely presented because of difficulties in finding such new compounds.
The authors of this review work at an occupational and environmental department. Many of the projects performed at the department are initiated by patients with some type of disease coming to the physicians, and a new type of exposure can be identified at the work place. Similarly, in the scientific literature, such new exposures can be identified through case reports.
The easiest way to find new substances would, of course, be if the industry itself would be more open with the introduction of new substances. However, it is often impossible to obtain such data. Thus, it is often a useful to attempt to understand the way the industry thinks. For example, one strategy the industry often applies is a minor modification of current chemicals that have obtained attention for its toxicity. Such examples are the substitution of DEHP with DiNP, which constitutes the introduction of a single CH2-group into the alcohol chains of the DEHP. Another example is introduction of a CF2-group into PFOA to obtain perfluorononanic acid, a compound with a rapid increase during the last years in serum from the general population. It is, therefore, important to develop HBM methods analysing groups of chemicals and not only single compounds.
In Europe, the new Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) legislation was adopted for all of Europe on the first of June 2007. According to REACH, all chemicals produced within or imported to Europe and exceeding one metric ton should be tested by the industry with respect to health and environmental aspects and then registered by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). The data regarding these registrations can be obtained at ECHAs home page (echa.europa.eu). This information provides scientists a possibility to find new large-scale chemicals with endocrine disrupting properties. In addition, close contact with other national or international agencies may provide input to discoveries of new chemicals for HBM. In Sweden, there is a group of researchers involved in HBM and several Swedish agencies, including Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Swedish National Food Agency, Medical Product Agency, Swedish Chemicals Agency, and the National Board of Health and Welfare that meets regularly discussing new HBM needs.
One possible method of finding a new EDC is to study animals at the top of the food chain such as seals and eagles. It was in this way that PCB exposure was discovered.188 A more sophisticated but also very time-consuming way of identifying new EDCs is through analyses of different matrices from the environment, for example, water from rivers, in which biological activity can be measured, a so-called effect-directed analysis.189 The compound in the matrix can then be separated in several steps, and the chemicals in fractions containing the activity can be identified by different methods.
Q2: Windows of exposure are extremely important in EDC. It appears that the greatest effects are “in utero” or peripubertal and yet may not be fully expressed until adulthood. It would be useful to discuss biomonitoring scenarios where exposures in the key windows would be collected for future study as the individuals attempt to reproduce. As exposome science is emerging, how do we monitor and put into perspective lifelong, ever-changing, exposure milieus?
A2: The first thing to consider when exposure strategies should be developed is the half-lives of the monitored compounds. Among the EDCs, there are several compounds with a very long half-life such as the PCBs and PFCs. The levels of those chemicals only vary a little over long-time periods. Therefore, at constant exposure, a steady state is first reached after three half-lives. Thus, for many PCBs and PFCs, one cannot expect to have reached the steady state even at 20 years of age. Furthermore, in periods where the levels can be expected to change more rapidly, such as during breastfeeding of babies, it is possible to develop models to calculate these changes. This together makes the sampling strategies easier to develop, and only a rather small number of samples are required to obtain a reasonable good estimate of the lifelong exposure milieus.
However, for many EDCs, the half-lives are very fast, with some consisting of just hours, such as those for phthalates, parabens, and bisphenol A. This makes it more difficult to develop HBM methods for an accurate estimate of the lifelong exposure because several samples are needed to obtain a good estimate of the exposure even during a short period of time. Therefore, a careful evaluation of the timing of the sampling during critical windows is very important for these chemicals. The identification of such critical windows must be based on pathophysiological and toxicological information; however, the discussion of how such data can be obtained is beyond the scope of this review. On the contrary, the need to analyse many samples makes it necessary to develop rapid and simple methods for the analyses of these compounds. The use of more rapid work-up procedures and direct injection of urine and protein depleted serum using analyses by LC-MS/MS is such techniques that has been introduced lately.142
The use of biobanked samples is important for an accurate estimate of the lifelong exposures. Lately, there has been an acceptance for this on a governmental level and many new biobanks are now created worldwide. This will be of great importance in the future. However, many biobanks have been created by far-sighted individual researchers. Such biobanks can be taken at a very critical window during pregnancy, for example, from rubella screening programs.
However, one problem with the creation of biobanks is that some chemicals are not stable during storage. An alternative to storage of samples can be to analyse the samples almost immediately, for example, through the direct injection of urine of protein-depleted serum and the collection of high-resolution time of flight (TOF) spectra with LC-MS equipment.190 These chromatograms can then be stored, and when new samples are later collected, these can be compared to the old ones with a method such as the partial least square analyses, and compounds with an increasing trend can be identified. This might also be a way to identify new chemical that should be monitored, as discussed for Q1.
COMPETING INTERESTS
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
REFERENCES
- 1.Angerer J, Ewers U, Wilhelm M. Human biomonitoring: state of the art. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2007;210:201–28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2007.01.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Esteban M, Castano A. Non-invasive matrices in human biomonitoring: a review. Environ Int. 2009;35:438–49. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2008.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Budnik LT, Baur X. The assessment of environmental and occupational exposure to hazardous substances by biomonitoring. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2009;106:91–7. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2009.0091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Manno M, Viau C, Cocker J, Colosio C, Lowry L, et al. Biomonitoring for occupational health risk assessment (BOHRA) Toxicol Lett. 2010;192:3–16. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Schulz C, Wilhelm M, Heudorf U, Kolossa-Gehring M. Update of the reference and HBM values derived by the German Human Biomonitoring Commission. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2011;215:26–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2011.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tanabe S, Minh TB. Dioxins and organohalogen contaminants in the Asia-Pacific region. Ecotoxicology. 2010;19:463–78. doi: 10.1007/s10646-009-0445-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rignell-Hydbom A, Rylander L, Giwercman A, Jonsson BA, Nilsson-Ehle P, et al. Exposure to CB-153 and p, p’- DDE and male reproductive function. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2066–75. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Schettgen T, Gube M, Esser A, Alt A, Kraus T. Plasma polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) levels of workers in a transformer recycling company, their family members, and employees of surrounding companies. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2012;75:414–22. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2012.674905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pratt IS, Anderson WA, Crowley D, Daly SF, Evans RI, et al. Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in breast milk of first-time Irish mothers: impact of the 2008 dioxin incident in Ireland. Chemosphere. 2012;88:865–72. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.03.095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhao G, Wang Z, Dong MH, Rao K, Luo J, et al. PBBs, PBDEs, and PCBs levels in hair of residents around e-waste disassembly sites in Zhejiang Province, China, and their potential sources. Sci Total Environ. 2008;397:46–57. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rylander L, Wallin E, Jonssson BA, Stridsberg M, Erfurth EM, et al. Associations between CB-153 and p, p’- DDE and hormone levels in serum in middle-aged and elderly men. Chemosphere. 2006;65:375–81. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Reiner EJ, Clement RE, Okey AB, Marvin CH. Advances in analytical techniques for polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, polychlorinated dibenzofurans and dioxin-like PCBs. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2006;386:791–806. doi: 10.1007/s00216-006-0479-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rylander L, Bjorkdahl CM, Axmon A, Giwercman A, Jonsson BA, et al. Very high correlations between fresh weight and lipid-adjusted PCB-153 serum concentrations: irrespective of fasting status, age, body mass index, gender, or exposure distributions. Chemosphere. 2012;88:828–31. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.03.089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Crinnion WJ. The CDC fourth national report on human exposure to environmental chemicals: what it tells us about our toxic burden and how it assist environmental medicine physicians. Altern Med Rev. 2010;15:101–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chiu A, Beaubier J, Chiu J, Chan L, Gerstenberger S. Epidemiologic studies of PCB congener profiles in North American fish consuming populations. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2004;22:13–36. doi: 10.1081/GNC-120038004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bonefeld-Jorgensen EC. The Human Health Effect Programme in Greenland, a review. Sci Total Environ. 2004;331:215–31. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.03.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Axmon A, Rylander L, Stromberg U, Jonsson B, Nilsson-Ehle P, et al. Polychlorinated biphenyls in serum and time to pregnancy. Environ Res. 2004;96:186–95. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2003.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rignell-Hydbom A, Rylander L, Elzanaty S, Giwercman A, Lindh CH, et al. Exposure to persistent organochlorine pollutants and seminal levels of markers of epididymal and accessory sex gland functions in Swedish men. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:1910–4. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jonsson BA, Rylander L, Lindh C, Rignell-Hydbom A, Giwercman A, et al. Inter-population variations in concentrations, determinants of and correlations between 2,2’,4,4’,5,5’-hexachlorobiphenyl (CB-153) and 1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis (p-chlorophenyl)-ethylene (p, p’- DDE): a cross-sectional study of 3161 men and women from Inuit and European populations. Environ Health. 2005;4:27. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-4-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rignell-Hydbom A, Axmon A, Lundh T, Jonsson BA, Tiido T, et al. Dietary exposure to methyl mercury and PCB and the associations with semen parameters among Swedish fishermen. Environ Health. 2007;6:14. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-6-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Haugen TB, Tefre T, Malm G, Jonsson BA, Rylander L, et al. Differences in serum levels of CB-153 and p, p’- DDE, and reproductive parameters between men living south and north in Norway. Reprod Toxicol. 2011;32:261–7. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2011.06.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hagmar L, Wallin E, Vessby B, Jonsson BA, Bergman A, et al. Intra-individual variations and time trends 1991-2001 in human serum levels of PCB, DDE and hexachlorobenzene. Chemosphere. 2006;64:1507–13. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.12.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Axmon A, Hagmar L, Jonsson BA. Rapid decline of persistent organochlorine pollutants in serum among young Swedish males. Chemosphere. 2008;70:1620–8. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.07.077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Weiss J, Wallin E, Axmon A, Jonsson BA, Akesson H, et al. Hydroxy-PCBs, PBDEs, and HBCDDs in serum from an elderly population of Swedish fishermen's wives and associations with bone density. Environ Sci Technol. 2006;40:6282–9. doi: 10.1021/es0610941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lundqvist C, Zuurbier M, Leijs M, Johansson C, Ceccatelli S, et al. The effects of PCBs and dioxins on child health. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2006;95:55–64. doi: 10.1080/08035320600886257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rignell-Hydbom A, Elfving M, Ivarsson SA, Lindh C, Jonsson BA, et al. A nested case-control study of intrauterine exposure to persistent organochlorine pollutants in relation to risk of type 1 diabetes. PLoS One. 2010;5:e11281. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wojtyniak BJ, Rabczenko D, Jonsson BA, Zvezday V, Pedersen HS, et al. Association of maternal serum concentrations of 2,2’, 4,4’5,5’- hexachlorobiphenyl (CB-153) and 1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis (p-chlorophenyl)-ethylene (p, p’- DDE) levels with birth weight, gestational age and preterm births in Inuit and European populations. Environ Health. 2010;9:56. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-9-56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Toft G, Thulstrup AM, Jonsson BA, Pedersen HS, Ludwicki JK, et al. Fetal loss and maternal serum levels of 2,2’,4,4’,5,5’- hexachlorbiphenyl (CB-153) and 1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis (p-chlorophenyl) ethylene (p, p’- DDE) exposure: a cohort study in Greenland and two European populations. Environ Health. 2010;9:22. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-9-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ni HG, Zeng H, Tao S, Zeng EY. Environmental and human exposure to persistent halogenated compounds derived from e-waste in China. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2009;29:1237–47. doi: 10.1002/etc.160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Union E, editor. Official Journal of the European Union; 2003. Directive 2003/11/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 February 2003 amending for the 24th time Council Directive 76/769/EEC relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations (pentabromodiphenyl ether, octabromodiphenyl ether) [Google Scholar]
- 31.Covaci A, Harrad S, Abdallah MA, Ali N, Law RJ, et al. Novel brominated flame retardants: a review of their analysis, environmental fate and behaviour. Environ Int. 2011;37:532–56. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2010.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Chen Y, Li J, Liu L, Zhao N. Polybrominated diphenyl ethers fate in China: a review with an emphasis on environmental contamination levels, human exposure and regulation. J Environ Manage. 2012;113:22–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ma J, Qiu X, Ren A, Jin L, Zhu T. Using placenta to evaluate the polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) exposure of fetus in a region with high prevalence of neural tube defects. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2012 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2012.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wang HS, Chen ZJ, Ho KL, Ge LC, Du J, et al. Hydroxylated and methoxylated polybrominated diphenyl ethers in blood plasma of humans in Hong Kong. Environ Int. 2012;47:66–72. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2012.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gill U, Chu I, Ryan JJ, Feeley M. Polybrominated diphenyl ethers: human tissue levels and toxicology. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2004;183:55–97. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-9100-3_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Mitchell MM, Woods R, Chi LH, Schmidt RJ, Pessah IN, et al. Levels of select PCB and PBDE congeners in human postmortem brain reveal possible environmental involvement in 15q11-q13 duplication autism spectrum disorder. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2012;53:589–98. doi: 10.1002/em.21722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Chovancova J, Conka K, Fabisikova A, Sejakova ZS, Domotorova M, et al. PCDD/PCDF, dl-PCB and PBDE serum levels of Slovak general population. Chemosphere. 2012;88:1383–9. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.05.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Croes K, Colles A, Koppen G, Govarts E, Bruckers L, et al. Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in human milk: a biomonitoring study in rural areas of Flanders (Belgium) Chemosphere. 2012;89:988–94. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.06.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Abdallah MA, Harrad S. Tetrabromobisphenol-A, hexabromocyclododecane and its degradation products in UK human milk: relationship to external exposure. Environ Int. 2011;37:443–8. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2010.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kawashiro Y, Fukata H, Omori-Inoue M, Kubonoya K, Jotaki T, et al. Perinatal exposure to brominated flame retardants and polychlorinated biphenyls in Japan. Endocr J. 2008;55:1071–84. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.k08e-155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hassine SB, Ameur WB, Gandoura N, Driss MR. Determination of chlorinated pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls, and polybrominated diphenyl ethers in human milk from Bizerte (Tunisia) in 2010. Chemosphere. 2012;89:369–77. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.05.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Domingo JL, Marti-Cid R, Castell V, Llobet JM. Human exposure to PBDEs through the diet in Catalonia, Spain: temporal trend. A review of recent literature on dietary PBDE intake. Toxicology. 2008;248:25–32. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2008.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zuurbier M, Leijs M, Schoeters G, ten Tusscher G, Koppe JG. Children's exposure to polybrominated diphenyl ethers. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2006;95:65–70. doi: 10.1080/08035320600886299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Costa LG, Giordano G. Developmental neurotoxicity of polybrominated diphenyl ether (PBDE) flame retardants. Neurotoxicology. 2007;28:1047–67. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2007.08.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Johnson-Restrepo B, Adams DH, Kannan K. Tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) and hexabromocyclododecanes (HBCDs) in tissues of humans, dolphins, and sharks from the United States. Chemosphere. 2008;70:1935–44. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ni HG, Zeng H, Tao S, Zeng EY. Environmental and human exposure to persistent halogenated compounds derived from e-waste in China. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2010;29:1237–47. doi: 10.1002/etc.160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ma J, Qiu X, Zhang J, Duan X, Zhu T. State of polybrominated diphenyl ethers in China: an overview. Chemosphere. 2012;88:769–78. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.03.093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Antignac JP, Cariou R, Maume D, Marchand P, Monteau F, et al. Exposure assessment of fetus and newborn to brominated flame retardants in France: preliminary data. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2008;52:258–65. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.200700077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Latini G. Monitoring phthalate exposure in humans. Clin Chim Acta. 2005;361:20–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cccn.2005.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Koch HM, Calafat AM. Human body burdens of chemicals used in plastic manufacture. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009;364:2063–78. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kondo F, Ikai Y, Hayashi R, Okumura M, Takatori S, et al. Determination of Five Phthalate Monoesters in Human Urine Using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2010;85:92–6. doi: 10.1007/s00128-010-0051-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Fromme H, Gruber L, Seckin E, Raab U, Zimmermann S, et al. Phthalates and their metabolites in breast milk: results from the Bavarian Monitoring of Breast Milk (BAMBI) Environ Int. 2011;37:715–22. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2011.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Chen M, Tao L, Collins EM, Austin C, Lu C. Simultaneous determination of multiple phthalate metabolites and bisphenol: a in human urine by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2012;904:73–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2012.07.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Jonsson BA, Richthoff J, Rylander L, Giwercman A, Hagmar L. Urinary phthalate metabolites and biomarkers of reproductive function in young men. Epidemiology. 2005;16:487–93. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000164555.19041.01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Toft G, Jonsson BA, Lindh CH, Jensen TK, Hjollund NH, Vested A, et al. Association between pregnancy loss and urinary phthalate levels around the time of conception. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120:458–63. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1103552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Joensen UN, Frederiksen H, Jensen MB, Lauritsen MP, Olesen IA, et al. Phthalate excretion pattern and testicular function: a study of 881 healthy danish men. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120:1397–403. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1205113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Jensen MS, Norgaard-Pedersen B, Toft G, Hougaard DM, Bonde JP, et al. Phthalates and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid in human amniotic fluid: temporal trends and timing of amniocentesis in pregnancy. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120:897–903. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1104522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Koch HM, Preuss R, Angerer J. Di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP): human metabolism and internal exposure: an update and latest results. Int J Androl. 2006;29:155–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2005.00607.x. discussion 81-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Wittassek M, Koch HM, Angerer J, Bruning T. Assessing exposure to phthalates-the human biomonitoring approach. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2011;55:7–31. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201000121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.CDC Fourth National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals. 2012 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Latini G, De Felice C, Verrotti A. Plasticizers, infant nutrition and reproductive health. Reprod Toxicol. 2004;19:27–33. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2004.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Carlstedt F, Jonsson BA, Bornehag CG. PVC flooring is related to human uptake of phthalates in infants. Indoor Air. 2013;23:32–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2012.00788.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Yen TH, Lin-Tan DT, Lin JL. Food safety involving ingestion of foods and beverages prepared with phthalate-plasticizer-containing clouding agents. J Formos Med Assoc. 2011;110:671–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2011.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Yang M, Park MS, Lee HS. Endocrine disrupting chemicals: human exposure and health risks. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2006;24:183–224. doi: 10.1080/10590500600936474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Commision E, editor. Official Journal of the European Union; 2011. Commision Directive 2011/8/EU of 28 January 2011 amending Directive 2002/72/EC as regards the restriction of use of Bisphenol A in plastic infant feeding bottles. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Welshons WV, Nagel SC, vom Saal FS. Large effects from small exposures. III. Endocrine mechanisms mediating effects of bisphenol A at levels of human exposure. Endocrinology. 2006;147:S56–69. doi: 10.1210/en.2005-1159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Vandenberg LN, Hauser R, Marcus M, Olea N, Welshons WV. Human exposure to bisphenol A (BPA) Reprod Toxicol. 2007;24:139–77. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2007.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Asimakopoulos AG, Thomaidis NS, Koupparis MA. Recent trends in biomonitoring of bisphenol A, 4-t-octylphenol, and 4-nonylphenol. Toxicol Lett. 2011;210:141–54. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.07.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Dekant W, Volkel W. Human exposure to bisphenol A by biomonitoring: methods, results and assessment of environmental exposures. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2008;228:114–34. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2007.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Bushnik T, Haines D, Levallois P, Levesque J, Van Oostdam J, et al. Lead and bisphenol A concentrations in the Canadian population. Health Rep. 2010;21:7–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Vandenberg LN, Chahoud I, Heindel JJ, Padmanabhan V, Paumgartten FJ, et al. Urinary, circulating, and tissue biomonitoring studies indicate widespread exposure to bisphenol A. Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118:1055–70. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Hengstler JG, Foth H, Gebel T, Kramer PJ, Lilienblum W, et al. Critical evaluation of key evidence on the human health hazards of exposure to bisphenol A. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2011;41:263–91. doi: 10.3109/10408444.2011.558487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Geens T, Goeyens L, Covaci A. Are potential sources for human exposure to bisphenol-A overlooked? Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2011;214:339–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2011.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Calafat AM, Kuklenyik Z, Reidy JA, Caudill SP, Ekong J, et al. Urinary concentrations of bisphenol A and 4-nonylphenol in a human reference population. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113:391–5. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Calafat AM, Ye X, Wong LY, Reidy JA, Needham LL. Exposure of the U.S. population to bisphenol A and 4-tetiary-octylphenol: 2003–2004. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116:39–44. doi: 10.1289/ehp.10753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Chen GW, Ding WH, Ku HY, Chao HR, Chen HY, et al. Alkylphenols in human milk and their relations to dietary habits in central Taiwan. Food Chem Toxicol. 2010;48:1939–44. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2010.04.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Ademollo N, Ferrara F, Delise M, Fabietti F, Funari E. Nonylphenol and octylphenol in human breast milk. Environ Int. 2008;34:984–7. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2008.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Ferrara F, Ademollo N, Orru MA, Silvestroni L, Funari E. Alkylphenols in adipose tissues of Italian population. Chemosphere. 2011;82:1044–9. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.10.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Lopez-Espinosa MJ, Freire C, Arrebola JP, Navea N, Taoufiki J, et al. Nonylphenol and octylphenol in adipose tissue of women in Southern Spain. Chemosphere. 2009;76:847–52. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.03.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Mnif W, Hassine AI, Bouaziz A, Bartegi A, Thomas O, et al. Effect of endocrine disruptor pesticides: a review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011;8:2265–303. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8062265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Reffstrup TK, Larsen JC, Meyer O. Risk assessment of mixtures of pesticides. Current approaches and future strategies. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2010;56:174–92. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2009.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Hernandez F, Sancho JV, Pozo OJ. Critical review of the application of liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry to the determination of pesticide residues in biological samples. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2005;382:934–46. doi: 10.1007/s00216-005-3185-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Wessels D, Barr DB, Mendola P. Use of biomarkers to indicate exposure of children to organophosphate pesticides: implications for a longitudinal study of children's environmental health. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111:1939–46. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Jaga K, Dharmani C. Sources of exposure to and public health implications of organophosphate pesticides. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2003;14:171–85. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892003000800004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Martinez Vidal JL, Plaza-Bolanos P, Romero-Gonzalez R, Garrido Frenich A. Determination of pesticide transformation products: a review of extraction and detection methods. J Chromatogr A. 2009;1216:6767–88. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Barr DB, Angerer J. Potential uses of biomonitoring data: a case study using the organophosphorus pesticides chlorpyrifos and malathion. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114:1763–9. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.John H, Worek F, Thiermann H. LC-MS-based procedures for monitoring of toxic organophosphorus compounds and verification of pesticide and nerve agent poisoning. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2008;391:97–116. doi: 10.1007/s00216-008-1925-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Crinnion WJ. Chlorinated pesticides: threats to health and importance of detection. Altern Med Rev. 2009;14:347–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Wong MH, Leung AO, Chan JK, Choi MP. A review on the usage of POP pesticides in China, with emphasis on DDT loadings in human milk. Chemosphere. 2005;60:740–52. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.04.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Abballe A, Guarino M, Taggi F, Traina ME, Urbani E, et al. Maternal blood levels of persistent organic pollutants can be used to estimate in utero exposure. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2008;44:281–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Wang G, Lu Y, Han J, Luo W, Shi Y, et al. Hexachlorobenzene sources, levels and human exposure in the environment of China. Environ Int. 2010;36:122–30. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2009.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Nweke OC, Sanders WH, 3 rd. Modern environmental health hazards: a public health issue of increasing significance in Africa. Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117:863–70. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0800126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Wallin E, Rylander L, Jonssson BA, Lundh T, Isaksson A, Hagmar L. Exposure to CB-153 and p, p’- DDE and bone mineral density and bone metabolism markers in middle-aged and elderly men and women. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16:2085–94. doi: 10.1007/s00198-005-2004-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Rignell-Hydbom A, Rylander L, Giwercman A, Jonsson BA, Lindh C, et al. Exposure to PCBs and p, p’- DDE and human sperm chromatin integrity. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113:175–9. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Bonde JP, Toft G, Rylander L, Rignell-Hydbom A, Giwercman A, et al. Fertility and markers of male reproductive function in Inuit and European populations spanning large contrasts in blood levels of persistent organochlorines. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116:269–77. doi: 10.1289/ehp.10700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Needham LL, Barr DB, Caudill SP, Pirkle JL, Turner WE, et al. Concentrations of environmental chemicals associated with neurodevelopmental effects in U.S. population. Neurotoxicology. 2005;26:531–45. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2004.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Bouvier G, Seta N, Vigouroux-Villard A, Blanchard O, Momas I. Insecticide urinary metabolites in nonoccupationally exposed populations. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2005;8:485–512. doi: 10.1080/10937400591007284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Kavvalakis MP, Tsatsakis AM. The atlas of dialkylphosphates; assessment of cumulative human organophosphorus pesticides’ exposure. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;218:111–22. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Egeghy PP, Cohen Hubal EA, Tulve NS, Melnyk LJ, Morgan MK, et al. Review of pesticide urinary biomarker measurements from selected US EPA children's observational exposure studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011;8:1727–54. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8051727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Koureas M, Tsakalof A, Tsatsakis A, Hadjichristodoulou C. Systematic review of biomonitoring studies to determine the association between exposure to organophosphorus and pyrethroid insecticides and human health outcomes. Toxicol Lett. 2012;210:155–68. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Sudakin DL. Pyrethroid insecticides: advances and challenges in biomonitoring. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2006;44:31–7. doi: 10.1080/15563650500394647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Sears ME, Kerr KJ, Bray RI. Arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury in sweat: a systematic review. J Environ Public Health 2012. 2012 doi: 10.1155/2012/184745. 184745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Kapaj S, Peterson H, Liber K, Bhattacharya P. Human health effects from chronic arsenic poisoning: a review. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2006;41:2399–428. doi: 10.1080/10934520600873571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Chen CJ, Hsu LI, Wang CH, Shih WL, Hsu YH, et al. Biomarkers of exposure, effect, and susceptibility of arsenic-induced health hazards in Taiwan. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2005;206:198–206. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2004.10.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Bhattacharyya R, Chatterjee D, Nath B, Jana J, Jacks G, et al. High arsenic groundwater: mobilization, metabolism and mitigation: an overview in the Bengal Delta Plain. Mol Cell Biochem. 2003;253:347–55. doi: 10.1023/a:1026001024578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Yoshida T, Yamauchi H, Fan Sun G. Chronic health effects in people exposed to arsenic via the drinking water: dose-response relationships in review. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2004;198:243–52. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2003.10.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Mukherjee A, Sengupta MK, Hossain MA, Ahamed S, Das B, et al. Arsenic contamination in groundwater: a global perspective with emphasis on the Asian scenario. J Health Popul Nutr. 2006;24:142–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Hughes MF. Biomarkers of exposure: a case study with inorganic arsenic. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114:1790–6. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Berzas Nevado JJ, Rodriguez Martin-Doimeadios RC, Guzman Bernardo FJ, Jimenez Moreno M, Herculano AM, et al. Mercury in the Tapajos River basin, Brazilian Amazon: a review. Environ Int. 2010;36:593–608. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2010.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Clarkson TW, Vyas JB, Ballatori N. Mechanisms of mercury disposition in the body. Am J Ind Med. 2007;50:757–64. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Wang G, Fowler BA. Roles of biomarkers in evaluating interactions among mixtures of lead, cadmium and arsenic. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2008;233:92–9. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2008.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Prozialeck WC, Edwards JR. Early biomarkers of cadmium exposure and nephrotoxicity. Biometals. 2010;23:793–809. doi: 10.1007/s10534-010-9288-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Olsson IM, Eriksson J, Oborn I, Skerfving S, Oskarsson A. Cadmium in food production systems: a health risk for sensitive population groups. Ambio. 2005;34:344–51. doi: 10.1639/0044-7447(2005)034[0344:cifpsa]2.0.co;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Jarup L, Akesson A. Current status of cadmium as an environmental health problem. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2009;238:201–8. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2009.04.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Dopp E, Hartmann LM, Florea AM, Rettenmeier AW, Hirner AV. Environmental distribution, analysis, and toxicity of organometal (loid) compounds. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2004;34:301–33. doi: 10.1080/10408440490270160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Lemos VA, de Carvalho AL. Determination of cadmium and lead in human biological samples by spectrometric techniques: a review. Environ Monit Assess. 2010;171:255–65. doi: 10.1007/s10661-009-1276-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Orloff K, Mistry K, Metcalf S. Biomonitoring for environmental exposures to arsenic. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2009;12:509–24. doi: 10.1080/10937400903358934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Crinnion WJN. CDC Fourth National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals. 2010 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Slotnick MJ, Nriagu JO. Validity of human nails as a biomarker of arsenic and selenium exposure: a review. Environ Res. 2006;102:125–39. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2005.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Sharp D. Environmental toxins, a potential risk factor for diabetes among Canadian Aboriginals. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2009;68:316–26. doi: 10.3402/ijch.v68i4.17372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Nordberg GF, Jin T, Wu X, Lu J, Chen L, et al. Prevalence of kidney dysfunction in humans-relationship to cadmium dose, metallothionein, immunological and metabolic factors. Biochimie. 2009;91:1282–5. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2009.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Li S, Xiao T, Zheng B. Medical geology of arsenic, selenium and thallium in China. Sci Total Environ. 2012;421-422:31–40. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.02.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.McClintock TR, Chen Y, Bundschuh J, Oliver JT, Navoni J, et al. Arsenic exposure in Latin America: biomarkers, risk assessments and related health effects. Sci Total Environ. 2012;429:76–91. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.08.051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Zhang L, Wong MH. Environmental mercury contamination in China: sources and impacts. Environ Int. 2007;33:108–21. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2006.06.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Elhamri H, Idrissi L, Coquery M, Azemard S, El Abidi A, et al. Hair mercury levels in relation to fish consumption in a community of the Moroccan Mediterranean coast. Food Addit Contam. 2007;24:1236–46. doi: 10.1080/02652030701329611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Passos CJ, Mergler D. Human mercury exposure and adverse health effects in the Amazon: a review. Cad Saude Publica. 2008;24(Suppl 4):s503–20. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2008001600004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Van Oostdam J, Donaldson SG, Feeley M, Arnold D, Ayotte P, et al. Human health implications of environmental contaminants in Arctic Canada: a review. Sci Total Environ. 2005;351-352:165–246. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.03.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Donaldson SG, Van Oostdam J, Tikhonov C, Feeley M, Armstrong B, et al. Environmental contaminants and human health in the Canadian Arctic. Sci Total Environ. 2010;408:5165–234. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.04.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Caldas ED, Jardim AN. Exposure to toxic chemicals in the diet: is the Brazilian population at risk? J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2012;22:1–15. doi: 10.1038/jes.2011.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Hajeb P, Jinap S, Ismail A, Mahyudin NA. Mercury pollution in Malaysia. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2012;220:45–66. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3414-6_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Qiu G, Feng X, Jiang G. Synthesis of current data for Hg in areas of geologic resource extraction contamination and aquatic systems in China. Sci Total Environ. 2012;421-422:59–72. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.09.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Barbosa F, Jr, Tanus-Santos JE, Gerlach RF, Parsons PJ. A critical review of biomarkers used for monitoring human exposure to lead: advantages, limitations, and future needs. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113:1669–74. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Brown RW, Longoria T. Multiple risk factors for lead poisoning in Hispanic sub-populations: a review. J Immigr Minor Health. 2010;12:715–25. doi: 10.1007/s10903-009-9245-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Acosta-Saavedra LC, Moreno ME, Rodriguez-Kessler T, Luna A, Arias-Salvatierra D, et al. Environmental exposure to lead and mercury in Mexican children: a real health problem. Toxicol Mech Methods. 2011;21:656–66. doi: 10.3109/15376516.2011.620997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Paoliello MM, De Capitani EM. Occupational and environmental human lead exposure in Brazil. Environ Res. 2007;103:288–97. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2006.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Patrick L. Lead toxicity, a review of the literature. Part 1: exposure, evaluation, and treatment. Altern Med Rev. 2006;11:2–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Yoshinaga J. Lead in the Japanese living environment. Environ Health Prev Med. 2012;17:433–43. doi: 10.1007/s12199-012-0280-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.He K, Wang S, Zhang J. Blood lead levels of children and its trend in China. Sci Total Environ. 2009;407:3986–93. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Koyashiki GA, Paoliello MM, Tchounwou PB. Lead levels in human milk and children's health risk: a systematic review. Rev Environ Health. 2010;25:243–53. doi: 10.1515/reveh.2010.25.3.243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Gottesfeld P, Pokhrel AK. Review: lead exposure in battery manufacturing and recycling in developing countries and among children in nearby communities. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2011;8:520–32. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2011.601710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants. 2009 [Google Scholar]
- 142.Lindh CH, Rylander L, Toft G, Axmon A, Rignell-Hydbom A, et al. Blood serum concentrations of perfluorinated compounds in men from Greenlandic Inuit and European populations. Chemosphere. 2012;88:1269–75. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.03.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Lau C, Anitole K, Hodes C, Lai D, Pfahles-Hutchens A, et al. Perfluoroalkyl acids: a review of monitoring and toxicological findings. Toxicol Sci. 2007;99:366–94. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfm128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Fromme H, Tittlemier SA, Volkel W, Wilhelm M, Twardella D. Perfluorinated compounds--exposure assessment for the general population in Western countries. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2009;212:239–70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2008.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Pico Y, Farre M, Llorca M, Barcelo D. Perfluorinated compounds in food: a global perspective. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2012;51:605–25. doi: 10.1080/10408391003721727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.EFSA. Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and their salts. EFSA J. 2008:1–131. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2008.653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Toft G, Jonsson BA, Lindh CH, Giwercman A, Spano M, et al. Exposure to perfluorinated compounds and human semen quality in arctic and European populations. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:2532–40. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Butenhoff JL, Olsen GW, Pfahles-Hutchens A. The applicability of biomonitoring data for perfluorooctanesulfonate to the environmental public health continuum. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114:1776–82. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Lindstrom AB, Strynar MJ, Libelo EL. Polyfluorinated compounds: past, present, and future. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45:7954–61. doi: 10.1021/es2011622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Chen MH, Ha EH, Wen TW, Su YN, Lien GW, et al. Perfluorinated compounds in umbilical cord blood and adverse birth outcomes. PLoS One. 2012;7:e42474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Houde M, Martin JW, Letcher RJ, Solomon KR, Muir DC. Biological monitoring of polyfluoroalkyl substances: a review. Environ Sci Technol. 2006;40:3463–73. doi: 10.1021/es052580b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Steenland K, Fletcher T, Savitz DA. Epidemiologic evidence on the health effects of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118:1100–8. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Olsen GW, Butenhoff JL, Zobel LR. Perfluoroalkyl chemicals and human fetal development: an epidemiologic review with clinical and toxicological perspectives. Reprod Toxicol. 2009;27:212–30. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2009.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Martin JW, Asher BJ, Beesoon S, Benskin JP, Ross MS. PFOS or PreFOS. Are perfluorooctane sulfonate precursors (PreFOS) important determinants of human and environmental perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) exposure? J Environ Monit. 2010;12:1979–2004. doi: 10.1039/c0em00295j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Darbre PD, Aljarrah A, Miller WR, Coldham NG, Sauer MJ, et al. Concentrations of parabens in human breast tumours. J Appl Toxicol. 2004;24:5–13. doi: 10.1002/jat.958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Calafat AM, Ye X, Wong LY, Bishop AM, Needham LL. Urinary concentrations of four parabens in the U.S. population: NHANES 2005–2006. Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118:679–85. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Ye X, Bishop AM, Reidy JA, Needham LL, Calafat AM. Parabens as urinary biomarkers of exposure in humans. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114:1843–6. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Janjua NR, Frederiksen H, Skakkebaek NE, Wulf HC, Andersson AM. Urinary excretion of phthalates and paraben after repeated whole-body topical application in humans. Int J Androl. 2008;31:118–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2007.00841.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Ye X, Wong LY, Jia LT, Needham LL, Calafat AM. Stability of the conjugated species of environmental phenols and parabens in human serum. Environ Int. 2009;35:1160–3. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2009.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Frederiksen H, Jorgensen N, Andersson AM. Parabens in urine, serum and seminal plasma from healthy Danish men determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2011;21:262–71. doi: 10.1038/jes.2010.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Darbre PD, Harvey PW. Paraben esters: review of recent studies of endocrine toxicity, absorption, esterase and human exposure, and discussion of potential human health risks. J Appl Toxicol. 2008;28:561–78. doi: 10.1002/jat.1358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Boas M, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Main KM. Thyroid effects of endocrine disrupting chemicals. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2012;355:240–8. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2011.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Brouwers MM, van Tongeren M, Hirst AA, Bretveld RW, Roeleveld N. Occupational exposure to potential endocrine disruptors: further development of a job exposure matrix. Occup Environ Med. 2009;66:607–14. doi: 10.1136/oem.2008.042184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Loden M, Beitner H, Gonzalez H, Edstrom DW, Akerstrom U, et al. Sunscreen use: controversies, challenges and regulatory aspects. Br J Dermatol. 2011;165:255–62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10298.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Krause M, Klit A, Blomberg Jensen M, Soeborg T, Frederiksen H, et al. Sunscreens: are they beneficial for health? An overview of endocrine disrupting properties of UV-filters. Int J Androl. 2012;35:424–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2012.01280.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Janjua NR, Kongshoj B, Andersson AM, Wulf HC. Sunscreens in human plasma and urine after repeated whole-body topical application. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2008;22:456–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2007.02492.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Schlumpf M, Kypke K, Wittassek M, Angerer J, Mascher H, et al. Exposure patterns of UV filters, fragrances, parabens, phthalates, organochlor pesticides, PBDEs, and PCBs in human milk: correlation of UV filters with use of cosmetics. Chemosphere. 2010;81:1171–83. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.09.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Chisvert A, Leon-Gonzalez Z, Tarazona I, Salvador A, Giokas D. An overview of the analytical methods for the determination of organic ultraviolet filters in biological fluids and tissues. Anal Chim Acta. 2012;752:11–29. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2012.08.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Kunisue T, Chen Z, Buck Louis GM, Sundaram R, Hediger ML, et al. Urinary concentrations of benzophenone-type UV filters in U.S. Women and their association with endometriosis. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46:4624–32. doi: 10.1021/es204415a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Dirtu AC, Van den Eede N, Malarvannan G, Ionas AC, Covaci A. Analytical methods for selected emerging contaminants in human matrices: an review. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2012;404:2555–81. doi: 10.1007/s00216-012-6053-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Calafat AM, Wong LY, Ye X, Reidy JA, Needham LL. Concentrations of the sunscreen agent benzophenone-3 in residents of the United States: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003–2004. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116:893–7. doi: 10.1289/ehp.11269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Schlumpf M, Durrer S, Faass O, Ehnes C, Fuetsch M, et al. Developmental toxicity of UV filters and environmental exposure: a review. Int J Androl. 2008;31:144–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2007.00856.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Wolff MS, Engel SM, Berkowitz GS, Ye X, Silva MJ, et al. Prenatal phenol and phthalate exposures and birth outcomes. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116:1092–7. doi: 10.1289/ehp.11007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Rutkiewicz I, Jakubowska N, Polkowska Z, Namiesnik J. Monitoring of occupational exposure to volatile organohalogen solvents (VOXs) in human urine samples of dry-cleaner workers by TLHS-DAI-GC-ECD procedure. Ind Health. 2011;49:126–32. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.ms1137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Quach T, Gunier R, Tran A, Von Behren J, Doan-Billings PA, et al. Characterizing workplace exposures in Vietnamese women working in California nail salons. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(Suppl 1):S271–6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.300099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Kheirbek I, Johnson S, Ross Z, Pezeshki G, Ito K, et al. Spatial variability in levels of benzene, formaldehyde, and total benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes in New York City: a land-use regression study. Environ Health. 2012;11:51. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-11-51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Ghittori S, Alessio A, Negri S, Maestri L, Zadra P, et al. A field method for sampling toluene in end-exhaled air, as a biomarker of occupational exposure: correlation with other exposure indices. Ind Health. 2004;42:226–34. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.42.226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Janasik B, Jakubowski M, Jalowiecki P. Excretion of unchanged volatile organic compounds (toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene and mesitylene) in urine as result of experimental human volunteer exposure. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2008;81:443–9. doi: 10.1007/s00420-007-0233-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Moro AM, Charao M, Brucker N, Bulcao R, Freitas F, et al. Effects of low-level exposure to xenobiotics present in paints on oxidative stress in workers. Sci Total Environ. 2010;408:4461–7. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.06.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Manini P, De Palma G, Andreoli R, Goldoni M, Mutti A. Determination of urinary styrene metabolites in the general Italian population by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2004;77:433–6. doi: 10.1007/s00420-004-0526-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.van Wendel de Joode B, Tielemans E, Vermeulen R, Wegh H, Kromhout H. Dermal exposure assessment to benzene and toluene using charcoal cloth pads. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2005;15:47–50. doi: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Imbriani M, Ghittori S. Gases and organic solvents in urine as biomarkers of occupational exposure: a review. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2005;78:1–19. doi: 10.1007/s00420-004-0544-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Wang BL, Takigawa T, Takeuchi A, Yamasaki Y, Kataoka H, et al. Unmetabolized VOCs in urine as biomarkers of low level exposure in indoor environments. J Occup Health. 2007;49:104–10. doi: 10.1539/joh.49.104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Vitali M, Ensabella F, Stella D, Guidotti M. Exposure to organic solvents among handicraft car painters: a pilot study in Italy. Ind Health. 2006;44:310–7. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.44.310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Scheepers PT, Konings J, Demirel G, Gaga EO, Anzion R, et al. Determination of exposure to benzene, toluene and xylenes in Turkish primary school children by analysis of breath and by environmental passive sampling. Sci Total Environ. 2010;408:4863–70. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.06.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Janasik B, Jakubowski M, Wesolowski W, Kucharska M. Unmetabolized VOCs in urine as biomarkers of low level occupational exposure. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2010;23:21–6. doi: 10.2478/v10001-010-0003-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Jimenez-Garza O, Marquez-Gamino S, Albores A, Caudillo-Cisneros C, Carrieri M, et al. CYP2E1 phenotype in Mexican workers occupationally exposed to low levels of toluene. Toxicol Lett. 2012;210:254–63. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Jensen S, Johnels AG, Olsson M, Otterlind G. DDT and PCB in marine animals from Swedish waters. Nature. 1969;224:247–50. doi: 10.1038/224247a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Brack W. Effect-directed analysis: a promising tool for the identification of organic toxicants in complex mixtures? Anal Bioanal Chem. 2003;377:397–407. doi: 10.1007/s00216-003-2139-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Gillet LC, Navarro P, Tate S, Röst H, Selevsek N, et al. Targeted data extraction of the MS/MS spectra generated by data-independent acquisition: a new concept for consistent and accurate proteome analysis. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012;11 doi: 10.1074/mcp.O111.016717. O111.016717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]