Skip to main content
Frontiers in Microbiology logoLink to Frontiers in Microbiology
. 2014 Jan 27;5:12. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00012

Lack of efflux mediated quinolone resistance in Salmonella enterica serovars Typhi and Paratyphi A

Sylvie Baucheron 1,2,*, Isabelle Monchaux 1,2, Simon Le Hello 3, François-Xavier Weill 3, Axel Cloeckaert 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC3902205  PMID: 24478769

Abstract

Salmonella enterica serovars Typhi and Paratyphi A isolates from human patients in France displaying different levels of resistance to quinolones or fluoroquinolones were studied for resistance mechanisms to these antimicrobial agents. All resistant isolates carried either single or multiple target gene mutations (i.e., in gyrA, gyrB, or parC) correlating with the resistance levels observed. Active efflux, through upregulation of multipartite efflux systems, has also been previously reported as contributing mechanism for other serovars. Therefore, we investigated also the occurrence of non-target gene mutations in regulatory regions affecting efflux pump expression. However, no mutation was detected in these regions in both Typhi and Paratyphi isolates of this study. Besides, no overexpression of the major efflux systems was observed for these isolates. Nevertheless, a large deletion of 2334 bp was identified in the acrS-acrE region of all S. Typhi strains but which did not affect the resistance phenotype. As being specific to S. Typhi, this deletion could be used for specific molecular detection purposes. In conclusion, the different levels of quinolone or FQ resistance in both S. Typhi and S. Paratyphi A seem to rely only on target modifications.

Keywords: Salmonella, ciprofloxacin, transcriptional regulatory genes, acrS, efflux pumps

Introduction

Enteric fever caused by the human-adapted pathogens Salmonella enterica serovars Typhi (S. Typhi) and Paratyphi A (S. Paratyphi A), B, and C, remains a major health problem (Crump and Mintz, 2010). A global epidemiologic study estimated that during the year 2000 typhoid fever caused 21.7 million illnesses and 21,7000 deaths and paratyphoid fever caused 5.4 million illnesses (Crump et al., 2004). During the past decade S. Paratyphi A was responsible for a growing proportion of enteric fever in Asia (Ochiai et al., 2005; Crump and Mintz, 2010). Enteric fever being associated with poor sanitation and unsafe food and water, it particularly affects children and adolescents in developing countries of Asia, Africa and Latin America (Crump et al., 2004; Bhan et al., 2005; Crump and Mintz, 2010). In developed countries, patients are most often ill-returned travellers or migrant workers (Bhan et al., 2005; Connor and Schwartz, 2005; Hassing et al., 2013).

To treat these infections, fluoroquinolones (FQ) and third-generation cephalosporins have been considered as first-line drugs, owing to the resistance to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole that appeared during the 1980s (Hassing et al., 2011, 2013). Multidrug resistance (MDR) in S. Typhi is encoded mainly by resistance genes carried by large conjugative plasmids and has been reported worldwide (Le et al., 2007). As a consequence of a widespread FQ usage, S. Typhi and S. Paratyphi A isolates resistant to nalidixic acid (NALR, minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] > 16 mg/L) and with decreased susceptibility to ciprofloxacin (CIPDS, MIC 0.125–1.0 mg/L) have also emerged. Such NALR-CIPDS S. Typhi and S. Paratyphi A have been isolated in endemic areas and also in developed countries (Roumagnac et al., 2006; Le et al., 2007; Gaborieau et al., 2010; Accou-Demartin et al., 2011; Hassing et al., 2011, 2013).

Resistance to quinolones in Salmonella spp. is mostly attributed to point mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining regions (QRDRs) of the target genes gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parE (Cloeckaert and Chaslus-Dancla, 2001; Piddock, 2002; Velge et al., 2005; Giraud et al., 2006). For the gyrA gene, coding the A subunit of DNA gyrase, a single mutation resulting in an amino acid substitution at the position 83 (Serine to Phenylalanine or to Tyrosine) or at the position 87 (Aspartic acid to Asparagine or Glycine) has been the most frequently described in NALR-CIPDS S. Typhi and S. Paratyphi A isolates (Bhan et al., 2005; Renuka et al., 2005; Le et al., 2007; Gaborieau et al., 2010; Hassing et al., 2011). A second mutation leading to the amino acid change at the position 80 (Serine to Isoleucine or to Arginine) of the ParC subunit of topoisomerase IV was described to increase the CIP MIC (≥0.5 mg/L) in S. Typhi and S. Paratyphi A human isolates from India (Gaind et al., 2006). Whereas three mutations, i.e., a double mutation in gyrA at both codons 83 and 87 and one mutation in parC, were shown to confer CIP resistance (MIC >1 mg/L) in S. Typhi and S. Paratyphi A human isolates from India or from Taiwan (Gaind et al., 2006; Lee et al., 2013).

Moreover, the varying levels of CIP resistance observed in S. Typhi and S. Paratyphi A isolates with only a single gyrA mutation suggest that other mechanisms could be involved in quinolone resistance in this serovar (Renuka et al., 2005). Resistance to FQ in S. Typhimurium has also been attributed to active efflux mechanism, due to overproduction of the AcrAB-TolC efflux system (Giraud et al., 2000, 2006; Cloeckaert and Chaslus-Dancla, 2001; Piddock, 2006). We have previously reported the contribution of the AcrAB-TolC efflux system in resistance to FQ in several MDR epidemic clones of S. Typhimurium, such as S. Typhimurium of phage types DT204 or DT104 (Baucheron et al., 2002, 2004a,b). Among the chromosomal loci affecting AcrAB-TolC expression, the ramRA locus appears to be the most important in Salmonella spp. (Abouzeed et al., 2008; Kehrenberg et al., 2009). ramR encodes a repressor protein (RamR) belonging to the TetR family of repressor proteins, and has been shown to be the local repressor protein of ramA transcription (Abouzeed et al., 2008; Baucheron et al., 2012); while ramA encodes a transcriptional activator protein (RamA) belonging to the AraC/XylS family of regulatory proteins (Nikaido et al., 2008; Bailey et al., 2010). The latter is involved in upregulating expression of the AcrAB-TolC system (Nikaido et al., 2008; Bailey et al., 2010). Several mutations in ramR or its binding site upstream of ramA, affecting expression of this efflux system, have been detected in clinical isolates of serovar Typhimurium or Kentucky and of minor serovars Hadar, Infantis, Livingstone, or Schwarzengrund (Abouzeed et al., 2008; Kehrenberg et al., 2009; Hentschke et al., 2010; Akiyama and Khan, 2012; Baucheron et al., 2013).

In the present study, we have characterized mechanisms involved in resistance to quinolones or fluroquinolones in 21 S. Typhi and S. Paratyphi A strains displaying different levels of resistance to these drugs and isolated from patients in France during the period 1997–2008. For a subset of strains, with suspected increased efflux activity, we investigated the occurrence of mutations in the global ram, sox and mar regulatory loci of AcrAB-TolC, and in the local acrR and acrS repressor genes of the AcrAB and AcrEF pumps, respectively (Abouzeed et al., 2008; Kehrenberg et al., 2009).

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains

The twenty one strains including 16 S. Typhi and 5 S. Paratyphi A selected for this study were collected by the French National Reference Center for Salmonella, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France. They were isolated in France from travellers or migrants between 1997 and 2008 (Table 1). The selection was made to obtain diversity in terms of geographic origin, year of isolation, genetic lineages (haplotype for S. Typhi; Roumagnac et al., 2006), and phenotype of resistance to quinolones (Table 1).

Table 1.

Salmonella enterica serovars Typhi and Paratyphi A strains analyzed in this study.

Strain Country Year of isolation Haplo type Antimicrobial resistance pattern MIC (mg/L) Substitution(s) in the QRDR of: AcrA production ratio*
NAL CIP GyrA GyrB ParC ParE
SALMONELLA TYPHI
06–423 India 2006 ND Pansusceptible 4 0.015 WT WT WT WT 1
06–426 India 2006 ND CIPDS 16 0.125 WT S464Y WT WT 1
02–1180 India 2002 H45 NALCIPDS 64 0.125 D87G WT WT WT 1
05–3275 Morocco 2005 H6 NALCIPDS 64 0.125 D87N WT WT WT 1
4(02)MB Vietnam 1997 H58 ASCSulTmpTeNAL 128 0.03 S83Y WT WT WT 0.5
222(97)MN Vietnam 1996 ND ASCSulTmpTeNALCIPDS 128 0.125 S83F WT WT WT 0.5
43(97)MN Vietnam 1996 H63 ASCSulTmpTeNALCIPDS 128 0.125 S83F WT WT WT 0.5
98–3139 Mexico 1998 H50 NALCIPDS 128 0.125 S83F WT WT WT 0.5
02–7744 India 2002 H52 NALCIPDS 128 0.125 S83F WT WT WT 0.5
226(97)MN Vietnam 1996 H61 ASCSulTmpTeNALCIPDS 128 0.25 S83F WT WT WT 0.5
97–2307 India 1997 H63 NALCIPDS 256 0.125 S83F WT WT WT 0.5
318(98)MB Vietnam 1998 H58 ASCSulTmpTeNALCIPDS 512 0.25 S83Y WT WT WT 1
39(98)MN Vietnam 1998 H58 ASCSulTmpTeNALCIPDS 512 0.25 S83F WT WT WT 1
4(02)MN Vietnam 2000 H58 ASCSulTmpTeNALCIPDS 1024 0.25 S83F WT WT D420N 1
5(04)MN Vietnam 2004 ND NALCIPDS 1024 0.25 S83F WT WT D420N 1
04–2176 India 2004 H58 SSpSulTmpTeNALCIP 1024 8 S83F; D87N WT S80I WT 1
SALMONELLA PARATYPHI A
08–8903 Senegal 2008 Pansusceptible 8 0.030 WT WT WT WT 2
07–6329 Burkina Faso 2007 CIPDS 16 0.25 WT S464F WT WT 2
05–208 India 2005 NALCIPDS 256 0.50 S83F WT WT WT 2
08–4271 Guinea Bissau 2008 NACIPDS 1024 1 S83F WT WT WT 2
08–2580 India 2008 NALCIPDS 1024 1 S83F WT WT WT 3
*

AcrA expression was measured by dot blotting with an anti-AcrA polyclonal antibody.

ND, not determined.

WT, wild type.

A, amoxicillin; S, streptomycin; Sp, spectinomycin; C, chloramphenicol; Sul, sulfamethoxazole; Tmp, trimethoprim; Te, tetracycline; NAL, nalidixic acid; CIP, ciprofloxacin; CIPDS, decreased susceptibility to ciprofloxacin.

D, aspartic acid; F, phenylalanine; G, glycine; I, isoleucine; N, asparagine; S, serine; Y, tyrosine.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Antimicrobial susceptibility was investigated by the standard disk diffusion method according to the recommendations of the Antibiogram Committee of the French Society for Microbiology (CA-SFM) (www.sfm-microbiologie.org/). The MICs of NAL and CIP were determined by the standard agar doubling dilution method as described previously (Baucheron et al., 2002). The NALR isolates were defined as having a MIC > 16 mg/L. The CIPR isolates were defined as having a MIC > 1 mg/L and CIPDS isolates as having a MIC comprised between 0.125 and 1.0 mg/L (Accou-Demartin et al., 2011; Hassing et al., 2013). MICs of these antibiotics were also determined in the presence of the efflux pump inhibitor Phe-Arg-β-naphthylamide (PAβ N, Sigma) at the following concentrations: 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 mg/L.

Assessment of target-affecting mechanisms

Mutations in the QRDRs of gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parE genes were detected as described previously (Le et al., 2007; Song et al., 2010; Accou-Demartin et al., 2011).

The search of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistances genes, qnrA, qnrB, qnrS, qnrD, aac(6')-Ib-cr, and qepA was performed as described previously (Accou-Demartin et al., 2011).

Assessment of efflux mechanisms

Efflux pump production was assessed by dot blot using an anti-AcrA polyclonal antibody as described previously (Abouzeed et al., 2008). Occurrence of mutations affecting acrAB, acrEF, and tolC expression was determined by PCR and sequencing the regulatory regions ramR-ramA, acrR-acrA, marC-marO-marR-marA, soxS-soxR, and acrS-acrE using primers listed in (Table 2). Transcription levels of efflux related genes acrA, acrB, acrF, tolC, ramA, and ramR were done by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) as described previously (Baucheron et al., 2012; Giraud et al., 2013). Primers used for qRT-PCR are listed in (Table 2).

Table 2.

Primers used for PCRs.

Primer used and target region Primer Nucleotide position relative to the LT2 strain genome sequence* Oligonucleotide sequence(s) (5'–3') Size (bp) Annealing temp (°C) Reference
DETECTION OF MUTATIONS
ramR-ramA ram5 638085 TCGGTAAAAGGCAGTTCCAG 958 60 Baucheron et al., 2013
ramA6 639042 GTCGATAACCTGAGCGGAAA
acrR-acrA acrR1 533463 CAGTGGTTCCGTTTTTAGTG 992 58 Olliver et al., 2005
acrR2 534454 ACAGAATAGCGACACAGAAA
marC-marO-marR-marA marR1 1597459 CAGTGTTGCGTCTGGACATC 787 60 Baucheron et al., 2013
marR2 1598245 GCTAACGGGAGCAGTACGAC
soxS-soxR sox1 4503970 CTACAGGCGGTGACGGTAAT 915 60 Baucheron et al., 2013
sox2 4504884 CGGCGCTTTAGTTTTAGGTG
acrS-acrE acrS3 3559106 AAAACGAACGGGAACTGATG 2874 *** 58 This study
acrS4 3561978 ACAAACATACCGGGAAGCAG
qRT-PCR
gmk gmk-f 3933294 TTGGCAGGGAGGCGTTT 62 60 Baucheron et al., 2012
gmk-r 3933355 GCGCGAAGTGCCGTAGTAAT
gyrB gyrB-f 4040275 TCTCCTCACAGACCAAAGATAAGCT 81 60 Baucheron et al., 2012
gyrB-r 4040195 CGCTCAGCAGTTCGTTCATC
rrs rrs-f NA** CCAGCAGCCGCGGTAAT 57 60 Baucheron et al., 2012
rrs-r NA** TTTACGCCCAGTAATTCCGATT
ramA ramA-f 639180 GCGTGAACGGAAGCTAAAAC 167 60 Baucheron et al., 2012
ramA-r 639346 GGCCATGCTTTTCTTTACGA
ramR ramR-f 638623 TAACGCAGGTGTTGCAGAAG 192 64 Baucheron et al., 2012
ramR-r 638432 TGGTTCAGACCCCAACTGAT
acrA acrA-f 533120 GAAACCGCACGTATCAACCT 220 60 Baucheron et al., 2012
acrA-r 532901 CCTGTTTCAGCGAACCATTT
acrB acrB-f 531348 TCGTGTTCCTGGTGATGTACCT 68 66 Baucheron et al., 2012
acrB-r 531281 AACCGCAATAGTCGGAATCAA
acrF acrF-f 3563042 GCTCTGTCGTCCATCTCAAAGA 70 66 This study
acrF-r 3563111 CGCGCTACAACGTTATAGTTTTCA
tolC tolC-f 3349107 GCCCGTGCGCAATATGAT 67 60 Baucheron et al., 2012
tolC-r 3349173 CCGCGTTATCCAGGTTGTTG
*

GenBank NC_003197.1.

**

NA: Not Applicable due to the number of copies of this gene in Salmonella.

***

2874 bp for S. Typhimurium or S. Paratyphi A and 539 bp for S. Typhi (see Figure 1).

Results and discussion

Resistance phenotypes and target-affecting mechanisms

The twenty one S. Typhi and S. Paratyphi A strains of this study were isolated in France but acquired abroad, mainly in Asia and Africa (Table 1). Among the S. Typhi strains, all but two were NALR (MIC > 16 mg/L). One of the two strains was pansusceptible and the second was CIPDS but only categorized as intermediate for NAL (NALI, MIC 16 mg/L). Of the 14 NALR strains, one was CIPR, 12 were CIPDS and one was CIPS (MIC 0.03 mg/L). Eight NALR S. Typhi strains were also multidrug resistant. The majority of the NALR S. Typhi strains belonged to haplotype H58 which had emerged in Southern Asia during the mid 1990s (Roumagnac et al., 2006; Le et al., 2007). Among the S. Paratyphi A strains, all but two were NALR. One of the two strains was pansusceptible and the second was NALI-CIPDS. The three others were NALR- CIPDS.

As shown in Table 1, both NALI-CIPDS had a mutation resulting in an amino acid substitution at position 464 of GyrB: serine to tyrosine for the S. Typhi isolate and serine to phenylalanine for the S. Paratyphi A isolate. The most frequent mechanism of resistance of NALR-CIPDS (n = 17) and NALR-CIPS (n = 1) strains, whatever the serovar, was a substitution at position 83 (serine to phenylalanine, n = 12, 66.6%) of GyrA. Other GyrA modifications were observed at position 83 (serine to tyrosine) in two isolates or at position 87 (aspartic acid to glycine, aspartic acid to asparagine) in one isolate for each. As described previously, a single substitution in GyrA was associated with resistance to nalidixic acid and decreased susceptibility to CIP (Bhan et al., 2005; Le et al., 2007; Gaborieau et al., 2010; Hassing et al., 2011). One exception was the S. Typhi strain 4 (02) MB, which was NALR-CIPS (and not CIPDS) despite a mutation in gyrA resulting in substitution serine to tyrosine at position 83.

Additional substitutions were found in ParE of 2 NALR-CIPDS S. Typhi strains that led to amino acid substitution aspartic acid to asparagine at position 420. In both cases, a 2-fold increase of NAL MICs was observed.

In the CIPR S. Typhi isolate, three mutations leading to a double substitution in GyrA at positions 83 (serine to phenylalanine) and 87 (aspartic acid to asparagine) and one substitution at the position 80 of ParC (serine to isoleucine), as observed in previous studies (Renuka et al., 2005; Gaind et al., 2006; Lee et al., 2013).

The NALR and CIPDS S. Typhi and S. Paratyphi A strains harboring a single substitution in GyrA showed various values for NAL (64–1024 mg/L) and CIP (0.03–0.5 mg/L) MICs which suggested the presence of other mechanisms of resistance. Since the plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance-conferring genes qnrA, qnrB, qnrD or qnrS, qepA, and aac(6')-Ib-cr were not detected, we investigated the role of the AcrAB-TolC efflux system.

Involvement of efflux

None of the S. Typhi strains showed significant AcrA overproduction by dot blot, but nevertheless all S. Paratyphi A isolates showed a 2 or 3-fold increased AcrA production relative to the susceptible S. Typhi isolate (Table 1). Thus, overproduction of AcrA seems not to be involved in CIPDS isolates compared with the susceptible isolates of S. Typhi or S. Paratyphi A. In presence of the efflux pump inhibitor PAβ N (20 or 40 mg/L), the CIP MICs similarly decreased (4 or 8-fold) in CIPDS and in susceptible strains (Table 3 and data not shown), which is in accordance with previous studies on S. Typhimurium and corresponds to a decrease of resistance level observed for acrB or tolC deletion mutants (Baucheron et al., 2002, 2004b).

Table 3.

Study of efflux in a subset of Salmonella enterica serovars Typhi and Paratyphi A strains.

Strain Antimicrobial resistance patterna MIC (mg/L)b Substitution(s) in the QRDR of c: acrSE sequencing Transcription level of:
NAL CIP GyrA GyrB ParC ParE acrA acrF acrB tolC ramA ramR
SALMONELLA TYPHI
06–423 Pansusceptible 4 0.015 [0.004] WT WT WT WT Deletiond 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
02–1180 NALCIPDS 64 0.125 [0.015] D87G WT WT WT Deletiond 1.5 0.7 0.5 0.8 0.9 1.4
05–3275 NALCIPDS 64 0.125 [0.030] D87N WT WT WT Deletiond 0.5 1.4 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.7
97–2307 NALCIPDS 256 0.125 [0.030] S83F WT WT WT Deletiond 1.7 0.8 0.8 0.7 1.9 2.2
04–2176 SSpSulTmpTeNALCIP 1024 8 [2] S83F; A87N WT S80I WT Deletiond 1.5 0.8 1.3 0.9 1.2 2.2
SALMONELLA PARATYPHI A
08–8903 Pansusceptible 8 0.030 [0.008] WT WT WT WT WT 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
07–6329 CIPDS 16 0.25 [0.060] WT S464F WT WT WT 1.6 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.2
05–208 NALCIPDS 256 0.50 [0.030] S83F WT WT WT WT 1.3 0.9 1.4 1.0 1.1 1.0
08–4271 NALCIPDS 1024 1 [0.25] S83F WT WT WT WT 1.2 1.1 0.7 1.4 1.3 1.3
08–2580 NALCIPDS 1024 1 [0.25] S83F WT WT WT WT 2.0 1.6 1.4 1.4 2.0 1.3
a

S, streptomycin; Sp, spectinomycin; Sul, sulfamethoxazole; Tmp, trimethoprim; Te, tetracycline; NAL, nalidixic acid; CIP, ciprofloxacin; CIPDS, decreased susceptibility to ciprofloxacin.

b

Values in brackets are MICs in the presence of the efflux pump inhibitor PAβ N at 40 mg/L.

c

WT, wild type; D, aspartic acid; F, phenylalanine; G, glycine; I, isoleucine; N, asparagine; S, serine.

d

2334 bp deleted.

Despite a lack of evidence of increased efflux in the resistance phenotype, we measured by qRT-PCR the transcription levels of efflux related genes acrA, acrF, acrB, tolC, ramA, and ramR in CIPDS non-MDR strains and in the CIPR strain. No differences were detected in the transcription levels of these genes, between susceptible, CIPDS and CIPR strains, whatever the serovar (Table 3). In addition, no mutations were detected in the regulatory regions of the AcrAB-TolC efflux system. However, during the screening of the regulatory regions, we identified a single large deletion of 2334 bp in the acrS-acrE region of all S. Typhi strains, including the susceptible one (Table 3). This deletion encompassed the acrS gene, that encodes a transcriptional repressor, and a large part of the acrE gene that encodes the AcrE periplasmic lipoprotein, which is homologous to AcrA (Olliver et al., 2005). This 2334 bp deletion was also observed in the acrS-acrE region of sequenced genomes of MDR S. Typhi CT18 strain (Parkhill et al., 2001) and pansusceptible TY2 strain (Deng et al., 2003) (Figure 1). Previously, it has been shown that acrS deletion in S. Typhimurium does not affect acrEF expression (Olliver et al., 2005). Similarly the natural acrSE deletion detected in S. Typhi had no impact on the acrF transcription level as observed in this study. To our knowledge, this is the first description of such a natural acrS-acrE chromosomal deletion and seems specific to S. Typhi since it was not detected in all currently sequenced genomes of the other serovars (not shown).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Deletion identified in the acrSE region relative to the genome sequence of S. Typhi strain CT18 (GenBank NC_003198.1). The sequence of the acrSE region of S. Typhi strain CT18 is compared to those of S. Paratyphi A strain ATCC9150 (GenBank NC_006511.1) and S. Typhi strain LT2 (GenBank NC_003197.1). Small black arrows indicate primers positions used for PCR to amplify and sequence the acrSE region. The 2334 bp chromosomal deletion was found in all S. Typhi strains studied.

Conclusions

The main mechanisms involved in quinolone or FQ resistance in both S. Typhi and S. Paratyphi A are target modifications. In contrast to what is seen in enteric pathogenic serovars, such as Typhimurium or the emerging CIPR Kentucky ST198 clone (Baucheron et al., 2013), increased efflux pump production-mediated mechanisms seem to be totally absent in both S. Typhi and S. Paratyphi A. The deletion identified in the acrSEF region, although not involved in the resistance phenotype, may be helpful for the specific detection of S. Typhi.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. Hong Le for providing some of the studied strains and to Laëtitia Fabre for excellent technical assistance. We would like to thank all corresponding laboratories of the French National Reference Center for E. coli, Shigella, and Salmonella. The French National Reference Center for E. coli, Shigella, and Salmonella is funded by the Institut Pasteur and the Institut de Veille Sanitaire. The “Unité des Bactéries Pathogènes Entériques” belongs to the “Integrative Biology of Emerging Infectious Diseases” Laboratory of Excellence funded by the French Government “Investissement d'Avenir” programme (grant no. ANR-10-LABX-62-IBEID).

References

  1. Abouzeed Y. M., Baucheron S., Cloeckaert A. (2008). ramR mutations involved in efflux-mediated multidrug resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52, 2428–2434 10.1128/AAC.00084-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Accou-Demartin M., Gaborieau V., Song Y., Roumagnac P., Marchou B., Achtman M., et al. (2011). Salmonella enterica Serotype Typhi with nonclassical quinolone resistance phenotype. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 17, 1091–1094 10.3201/eid/1706.101242 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Akiyama T., Khan A. A. (2012). Molecular characterization of strains of fluoroquinolone-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Schwarzengrund carrying multidrug resistance isolated from imported foods. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 67, 101–110 10.1093/jac/dkr414 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bailey A. M., Ivens A., Kingsley R., Cottell J. L., Wain J., Piddock L. J. V. (2010). RamA, a member of the AraC/XylS family, influences both virulence and efflux in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. J. Bacteriol. 192, 1607–1616 10.1128/JB.01517-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baucheron S., Chaslus-Dancla E., Cloeckaert A. (2004a). Role of TolC and parC mutation in high-level fluoroquinolone resistance in Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium DT204. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 53, 657–659 10.1093/jac/dkh122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Baucheron S., Tyler S., Boyd D., Mulvey M. R., Chaslus-Dancla E., Cloeckaert A. (2004b). AcrAB-TolC directs efflux-mediated multidrug resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48, 3729–3735 10.1128/AAC.48.10.3729-3735.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Baucheron S., Coste F., Canepa S., Maurel M. C., Giraud E., Culard F., et al. (2012). Binding of the RamR repressor to wild-type and mutated promoters of the RamA gene involved in efflux-mediated multidrug resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56, 942–948 10.1128/AAC.05444-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Baucheron S., Imberechts H., Chaslus-Dancla E., Cloeckaert A. (2002). The AcrB multidrug transporter plays a major role in high-level fluoroquinolone resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium phage type DT204. Microb. Drug Resist. 8, 281–289 10.1089/10766290260469543 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Baucheron S., Le Hello S., Doublet B., Giraud E., Weill F. X., Cloeckaert A. (2013). ramR mutations affecting fluoroquinolone susceptibility in epidemic multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Kentucky ST198. Front. Microbiol. 4:213 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00213 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bhan M. K., Bahl R., Bhatnagar S. (2005). Typhoid and paratyphoid fever. Lancet 366, 749–762 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67181-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cloeckaert A., Chaslus-Dancla E. (2001). Mechanisms of quinolone resistance in Salmonella. Vet. Res. 32, 291–300 10.1051/vetres:2001105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Connor B. A., Schwartz E. (2005). Typhoid and paratyphoid fever in travellers. Lancet Infect. Dis. 5, 623–628 10.1016/S1473-3099(05)70239-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Crump J. A., Luby S. P., Mintz E. D. (2004). The global burden of typhoid fever. Bull. World Health Organ. 82, 346–353 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Crump J. A., Mintz E. D. (2010). Global trends in typhoid and paratyphoid Fever. Clin. Infect. Dis. 50, 241–246 10.1086/649541 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Deng W., Liou S. R., Plunkett G., 3rd., Mayhew G. F., Rose D. J., Burland V., et al. (2003). Comparative genomics of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi strains Ty2 and CT18. J. Bacteriol. 185, 2330–2337 10.1128/JB.185.7.2330-2337.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gaborieau V., Weill F. X., Marchou B. (2010). A case of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi with decreased susceptibility to ciprofloxacin. Med. Mal. Infect. 40, 691–695 10.1016/j.medmal.2010.06.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gaind R., Paglietti B., Murgia M., Dawar R., Uzzau S., Cappuccinelli P., et al. (2006). Molecular characterization of ciprofloxacin-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi and Paratyphi A causing enteric fever in India. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 58, 1139–1144 10.1093/jac/dkl391 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Giraud E., Baucheron S., Cloeckaert A. (2006). Resistance to fluoroquinolones in Salmonella: emerging mechanisms and resistance prevention strategies. Microbes Infect. 8, 1937–1944 10.1016/j.micinf.2005.12.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Giraud E., Baucheron S., Virlogeux-Payant I., Nishino K., Cloeckaert A. (2013). Effects of natural mutations in the ramRA locus on invasiveness of epidemic fluoroquinolone-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium isolates. J. Infect. Dis. 207, 794–802 10.1093/infdis/jis755 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Giraud E., Cloeckaert A., Kerboeuf D., Chaslus-Dancla E. (2000). Evidence for active efflux as the primary mechanism of resistance to ciprofloxacin in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44, 1223–1228 10.1128/AAC.44.5.1223-1228.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hassing R. J., Goessens W. H., Mevius D. J., van Pelt W., Mouton J. W., Verbon A., et al. (2013). Decreased ciprofloxacin susceptibility in Salmonella Typhi and Paratyphi infections in ill-returned travellers: the impact on clinical outcome and future treatment options. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 32, 1295–1301 10.1007/s10096-013-1878-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hassing R. J., Menezes G. A., van Pelt W., Petit P. L., van Genderen P. J., Goessens W. H. (2011). Analysis of mechanisms involved in reduced susceptibility to ciprofloxacin in Salmonella enterica serotypes Typhi and Paratyphi A isolates from travellers to Southeast Asia. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 37, 240–243 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.10.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hentschke M., Christner M., Sobottka I., Aepfelbacher M., Rohde H. (2010). Combined ramR mutation and presence of a Tn1721-associated tet(A) variant in a clinical isolate of Salmonella enterica serovar Hadar resistant to tigecycline. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54, 1319–1322 10.1128/AAC.00993-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kehrenberg C., Cloeckaert A., Klein G., Schwarz S. (2009). Decreased fluoroquinolone susceptibility in mutants of Salmonella serovars other than Typhimurium: detection of novel mutations involved in modulated expression of ramA and soxS. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 64, 1175–1180 10.1093/jac/dkp347 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Le T. A., Fabre L., Roumagnac P., Grimont P. A., Scavizzi M. R., Weill F. X. (2007). Clonal expansion and microevolution of quinolone-resistant Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi in Vietnam from 1996 to 2004. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45, 3485–3492 10.1128/JCM.00948-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lee C. J., Su L. H., Huang Y. C., Chiu C. H. (2013). First isolation of ciprofloxacin-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi in Taiwan. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 46, 469–473 10.1016/j.jmii.2013.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Nikaido E., Yamaguchi A., Nishino K. (2008). AcrAB multidrug efflux pump regulation in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium by RamA in response to environmental signals. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 24245–24253 10.1074/jbc.M804544200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ochiai R. L., Wang X., von Seidlein L., Yang J., Bhutta Z. A., Bhattacharya S. K., et al. (2005). Salmonella paratyphi A rates, Asia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 11, 1764–1766 10.3201/eid1111.050168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Olliver A., Valle M., Chaslus-Dancla E., Cloeckaert A. (2005). Overexpression of the multidrug efflux operon acrEF by insertional activation with IS1 or IS10 elements in Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium DT204 acrB mutants selected with fluoroquinolones. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49, 289–301 10.1128/AAC.49.1.289-301.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Parkhill J., Dougan G., James K. D., Thomson N. R., Pickard D., Wain J., et al. (2001). Complete genome sequence of a multiple drug resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi CT18. Nature 413, 848–852 10.1038/35101607 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Piddock L. J. V. (2002). Fluoroquinolone resistance in Salmonella serovars isolated from humans and food animals. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 26, 3–16 10.1016/S0168-6445(01)00076-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Piddock L. J. V. (2006). Clinically relevant chromosomally encoded multidrug resistance efflux pumps in bacteria. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 19, 382–402 10.1128/CMR.19.2.382-402.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Renuka K., Sood S., Das B. K., Kapil A. (2005). High-level ciprofloxacin resistance in Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi in India. J. Med. Microbiol. 54, 999–1000 10.1099/jmm.0.45966-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Roumagnac P., Weill F. X., Dolecek C., Baker S., Brisse S., Chinh N. T., et al. (2006). Evolutionary history of Salmonella Typhi. Science 314, 1301–1304 10.1126/science.1134933 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Song Y., Roumagnac P., Weill F. X., Wain J., Dolecek C., Mazzoni C. J., et al. (2010). A multiplex single nucleotide polymorphism typing assay for detecting mutations that result in decreased fluoroquinolone susceptibility in Salmonella enterica serovars Typhi and Paratyphi A. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 65, 1631–1641 10.1093/jac/dkq175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Velge P., Cloeckaert A., Barrow P. (2005). Emergence of Salmonella epidemics: the problems related to Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis and multiple antibiotic resistance in other major serotypes. Vet. Res. 36, 267–288 10.1051/vetres:2005005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES