Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2014 Jan 27;4:3877. doi: 10.1038/srep03877

Ferromagnetic CaRuO3

Shivendra Tripathi 1, Rakesh Rana 1, Sanjay Kumar 1, Parul Pandey 1, R S Singh 1, D S Rana 1,a
PMCID: PMC3902489  PMID: 24464302

Abstract

The non-magnetic and non-Fermi-liquid CaRuO3 is the iso-structural analog of the ferromagnetic (FM) and Fermi-liquid SrRuO3. We show that an FM order in the orthorhombic CaRuO3 can be established by the means of tensile epitaxial strain. The structural and magnetic property correlations in the CaRuO3 films formed on SrTiO3 (100) substrate establish a scaling relation between the FM moment and the tensile strain. The strain dependent crossover from non-magnetic to FM CaRuO3 was observed to be associated with switching of non-Fermi liquid to Fermi-liquid behavior. The intrinsic nature of this strain-induced FM order manifests in the Hall resistivity too; the anomalous Hall component realizes in FM tensile-strained CaRuO3 films on SrTiO3 (100) whereas the non-magnetic compressive-strained films on LaAlO3 (100) exhibit only the ordinary Hall effect. These observations of an elusive FM order are consistent with the theoretical predictions of scaling of the tensile epitaxial strain and the magnetic order in tensile CaRuO3. We further establish that the tensile strain is more efficient than the chemical route to induce FM order in CaRuO3.


Among various 4d transition metal oxides, the metallic SrRuO3 is the only system which exhibits a long-range ferromagnetic order with a Curie temperature of 165 K1,2,3. Attributes of a large magnetic moment and the metallic behavior of SrRuO3 make it as one of the most suitable materials as ferromagnetic metal electrodes in the spintronic devices based on spin-polarized tunnel junctions4. Owing to various fundamental and technological interests in SrRuO3, a variety of studies have been devoted on this compound in the recent past. However, the large magnetic coercivity of SrRuO3 is a drawback in context of the use of its magnetic order in magnetic devices. In this regard, CaRuO3 is a natural alternative choice as it is iso-structural and iso-electronic with SrRuO3 and is metallic down to low temperatures5. It also exhibits a wide variety of properties such as non-fermi liquid behaviour5, magnetic quantum criticality6, pressure induced post-perovskite structure7, etc. However, contrary to expectations the CaRuO3 does not exhibit a long-range magnetic ordering. Though it is a known metallic paramagnet8,9, some studies have indicated that it exhibit antiferromagnetic order with TN ~ 110 K2. Its magnetic state, therefore, is still debated and is far from established. One agreement that has been reached among various researchers is that the CaRuO3 is on the verge of establishing magnetic correlations2,10. In ABO3 structure, the difference in ionic radius of A-site cations Sr2+ (~1.31 Å) and Ca2+ (~1.12 Å) is responsible for the difference in the ground state of SrRuO3 and CaRuO311,12. Owing to this reason, there is a definite interest in understanding and manipulating the magnetic ground state of CaRuO3 by the means of chemical substitution, disorder and strain with an aim to obtain ferromagnetic order as in its counterpart SrRuO3.

The CaRuO3 is a metal with a GdFeO3 type orthorhombic structure (a = 5.541 Å, b = 5.362 Å, and c = 7.686 Å, space group – Pnma). The central Ca atom is surrounded by corner sharing RuO6 octahedra14. The distortion of RuO6 octahedra affects the Ru-O-Ru bond angles, which consequently affects the electronic and magnetic properties11. As per the phase diagram of a class of perovskites, the CaRuO3 lies in the close vicinity of quantum critical region which separates FM and Fermi-liquid systems from the antiferromagnetic and non-Fermi liquids. It is established that both CaRuO3 and SrRuO3 have strikingly similar electronic structure and correlations11,12. So, the sole reason for difference in their magnetic and electrical properties lies in the structural distortion; it is the size effect which results in larger Ru-O-Ru bond angles for the SrRuO3 (see figure 1). Several theoretical studies have suggested the metallic CaRuO3 to be on the verge of establishing ferromagnetic phase transition6,13. A magnetic order in CaRuO3 is expected if the Ru-O-Ru bond angles and bond distances can be manipulated by two primary means, namely, chemical substitution at Ca and Ru sites or physical means of epitaxial and uniaxial strains in thin films. He and Cava reported that disorder created by substitution of non-magnetic Ti at Ru site in CaRuO3 induces ferromagnetism in the system6. Extensive studies on CaRu1−xMxO3, where M (transition metal) is either a magnetic or non-magnetic ion, have shown doping induced discernible modifications of the magnetic and electronic phases15,16. Amongst various ions, the Cr substitution for Ru has proved the most effective as it induces substantial ferromagnetism in CaRuO317,18,19,20, albeit transition from metallic to insulating state.

Figure 1. Schematic of the distorted RuO6 octahedra for (a) CaRuO3 and (b) SrRuO3.

Figure 1

Understanding and manipulating the magnetic ground state of metallic CaRuO3 is one of the key issues in perovskite ruthanates. All above-mentioned methods to induce FM order in CaRuO3 involve chemical substitution which disrupts the Ru sub-lattice. Zayak et al theoretically showed that a magnetic order in chemically pure CaRuO3 can be established by applying tensile strain and that the magnitude of the induced FM moments scales with the tensile strain20. Compressive strain, on the other hand, does not modify the magnetic state. Experimental observations of any such effects in which FM moment is induced as a function of epitaxial strain in single layer phase-pure films are yet to be realized. In the present work, we have deposited the CaRuO3 thin films on substrates with lattice constants inducing either the compressive strain or the tensile strain. In this letter, we show that the tensile strain induces a weak FM order in pure CaRuO3 thin films and that the magnetic moment scales with the tensile strain, which is commensurate with the theoretical predictions. We further demonstrate that the tensile strained CaRuO3 films possess larger magnetic moment compared to that of chemically modified CaRu0.9Cr0.1O3 films.

The CaRuO3 films of various thicknesses, in the range of 20–140 nm, were deposited using a 248 nm KrF excimer laser. The parameters for various depositions were: energy density between 1.7–3.3 J/cm2, laser pulse frequency - 4 Hz, substrate temperature - 700°C, O2 partial pressure - 40 Pa, O2 annealing pressure of 1000–1800 Pa. The SrTiO3 (100) [STO] substrate (lattice constant ~3.905 Å) with a mismatch of about 2% was chosen to obtain tensile strained CaRuO3 (CRO) thin films. Though phase-pure oriented films were formed on BaTiO3 (100) [a ~ 3.99 Å] and MgAl2O4 (100) [a ~ 4.04 Å] substrates, strained films could not be obtained as the lattice mismatch of these substrates with CRO is too large to be accommodated for stability of strained phase. Only films on STO substrate could be stabilized with a reasonable tensile strain. It is known that the CRO films on STO have a tendency for formation of pseudo-heterostructures28. The problem with these films is that it is difficult to assign the origin of magnetic moment, if any, to any of the co-existing phases. Hence, it is required to segregate these epitaxial phases and investigate their magnetic properties. We started the usual deposition by varying the energy density and keeping other parameters fixed. The film obtained with energy density of 1.7 J/cm2, say CRO-A, possessed two phases as evident from two closely spaced epitaxial reflections in θ-2θ patterns (Fig. 1a). To get rid of one phase in this pseudo-heterostructure, the energy density was increased to 2.3 J/cm2. Thus obtained film, say CRO-B, too possessed two epitaxial phases. Finally, films with single homogenous phase were obtained when laser energy density was fixed at 2.0 J/cm2. With these optimized parameters, films with thickness of 130 nm and 30 nm, respectively, labeled as CRO-C and CRO-D were deposited. For CaRu0.9Cr0.1O3, the 30 nm and 130 nm films (CRO10-A and CRO10-B, respectively) were deposited with optimized energy density of 2.0 J/cm2.

Results

Figure 2 (a) shows the θ-2θ x-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of four representative CaRuO3 thin films. The CRO-A and CRO-B films show two closely spaced peaks indicative of two co-existing structures. There is a clear splitting of both (100) and (200) peaks in CRO-A film (Fig. 2a), which arises from co-existing structural polymorphs, namely, fully and/or partial strained orthorhombic and cubic phases of the CRO film. On the other hand, the optimized films, namely, CRO-C and CRO-D showed only one epitaxial reflection suggesting only one structural form for these films. For analyzing the strain states in the films, the reciprocal space maps (RSMs) were acquired around asymmetric (301) peak. Figure 1c–e shows RSMs for CRO-A, CRO-C and CRO-D films around (301) peak. The salient features of these data are: i) similar to that of data in Fig. 2a, these RSM data show that the CRO-A shows dual peaks while the CRO-C and CRO-D films show only one epitaxial peak, ii) the peak of the films do not lie on the pseudomorphic line of the STO substrate implying that none of these films is coherently strained and that the in-plane lattice parameters of the substrate and film are not the same, iii) among the films exhibiting only one peak (i.e., in CRO-C and CRO-D), the out-of plane lattice parameter of 3.876(1) Å for CRO-C film with a thickness of 130 nm decreased to 3.854(1) Å for CRO-D film. This suggests that the tensile strain increases with decreasing thickness, which is further supported by the variations in the in-plane parameters of all these films, as calculated from the RSM data. This is consistent with behavior of tensile strained films; as the out-of-plane lattice constant decreases, the in-plane parameter increases to accommodate the strain. We observed the same as one of the in-plane lattice constant increased from 3.866(1) Å for CRO-C film to 3.883(1) Å for CRO-D film. In CRO-A and CRO-B films, the out-of-plane lattice constant of either of the reflections do not match with that of CRO-C or CRO-D film. Overall, these data suggest that all the films are partially strained film, among which the films with single structural phase exhibit increasing tensile strain with decreasing thickness.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(a) θ-2θ XRD patterns for CRO-A, CRO-B, CRO-C and CRO-D films; (b) (200) peak is magnified in which the arrow film CRO-A and CRO-B indicates another CRO phase. Reciprocal space maps for (c) CRO-A film, (d) CRO-C film and (e) CRO-D film.

Figure 3a–b shows the zero-field-cooled (ZFC) and field-cooled (FC) magnetization (M) versus temperature (T) data obtained in a field of 500 Oe for all the CaRuO3 films. It is seen that the films with only one phase, i.e., CRO-C and CRO-D, exhibit ferromagnetic (FM) like phase transition whereas CRO-A and CRO-B films do not show any indication of FM phase down to low temperatures. In the CRO-C film, the transition temperature is not well defined, but the bifurcation between ZFC and FC curves clearly points towards weak FM phase in this film. The CRO-D film, however, exhibits a pronounced magnetic transition with clearly discernible transition temperature in the vicinity of 100 K. Also, the FC magnetic moment of this film is about 3–4 times more than that of CRO-C film. This suggests that magnetic transition that tends to set in thicker CRO-C film manifests itself more clearly in more strained CRO-D film. To ascertain the hysteretic nature of the FM phase in these films, magnetization versus magnetic field isotherms for all the films were collected at 10 K (Fig. 3c). A linear variation of magnetization with magnetic field for CRO-A and CRO-B films unambiguously confirmed non-magnetic nature of these films. The CRO-C and CRO-D films, whereas, showed a FM like hysteresis which clearly corroborated with their temperature dependent magnetization data for existence of the FM order in these films. Furthermore, the saturation magnetic moment of these films increased with increasing tensile strain, larger for the CRO-D film compare to that for the CRO-C film. Overall, from both the temperature- and field-dependent magnetization data of these magnetic CaRuO3 films, it may be inferred that the magnitude of magnetic moment scales with the tensile strain.

Figure 3. Zero-field-cooled (ZFC) and field-cooled (FC) Magnetization (M) versus temperature plots for (a) CRO-D film, and (b) CRO-C film. (c) Magnetization (M) versus field (H) isotherms at T = 10 K for CRO-A, CRO-B, CRO-C and CRO-D films.

Figure 3

The efficiency of strain in inducing the magnetic moment in CaRuO3 was evaluated by comparing the magnetic properties of the strained films and the Cr-modified films. The CaRu1−xCrxO3 (x = 0–0.3) series of bulk compounds shows a maximum of saturation magnetic moment (MS) of ~0.35 μB/f.u for x = 0.1517. The MS decreases sharply for x > 0.15 and for x < 0.15. In our studies we have deposited films of x = 0.10 for which the MS of the bulk compound is ~0.15 μB/f.u17. We investigated the structure and magnetization of two weakly FM CaRu0.9Cr0.1O3 films, namely, a 30 nm film (CRO10-A) and a 130 nm film (CRO10-B). Figure 4 show the XRD and the magnetization data of these films. Similar to that in pure CRO films, the out-of-plane lattice constant decreases from 3.886(1) Å to 3.867(1) Å as the film thickness decreases from 130 nm for CRO10-B film to 30 nm for CRO10-A film. A consequent increase in the in-plane lattice parameters, as confirmed by RSM data (not shown here), suggests a larger tensile strain for 30 nm film. The ZFC-FC magnetization versus temperature data shows that both the films exhibit FM transition at around same temperature (Fig. 4b). The magnetization-field isotherms taken at 10 K clearly show that the saturation magnetization increases with the decreasing thickness of film, which implies that the FM moment increases as the tensile increases in Cr-doped films (Fig. 4c). There are two implications of these results, namely, i) the scaling of tensile strain and magnetization is similar to that observed for pure CRO films and ii) magnetic moment of pure strained CRO-D film is marginally large compared to that of Cr-doped strained CRO10-A film. This is surprising because Cr-doping alone has proved most efficient in inducing the FM order in CRO17. In present case, the Cr-doped films were strained to same extent as the pure films. Despite this, larger moment in pure films suggests that the tensile epitaxial strain is clearly more efficient than the chemical route to induce magnetic order in otherwise non-magnetic CaRuO3.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(a) θ-2θ XRD plots for CRO10-A and CRO10-B films. The (200) peak is magnified in the inset figure. Arrows in this figure indicate the (200) peak of CaRuO3. (b) Zero-field-cooled (ZFC) and field-cooled (FC) Magnetization (M) versus temperature plots for CRO10-A and CRO10-B films. (c) Magnetization versus field (H) isotherms for same films measured at T = 10 K.

At this point, it is imperative to discuss the Ca/Ru ratio in the CRO films under investigation. In an elaborate study, Rao et al performed Rutherford Backscattering experiments on CRO/STO (100) thin films prepared under different conditions and showed that the stoichiometric films exhibit a bulk-like metallic behavior whereas the non-stoichiometric films exhibit semiconducting behavior21. In present case, the temperature dependence of electrical resistivity for all films reveals that all the CaRuO3 films exhibit metallic behavior (Fig. 5) while the Cr-doped films exhibit semiconducting behavior (see inset of Fig. 5). In both the cases, the resistive behavior is representative of their respective polycrystal bulk counterparts2. This suggests a stoichiometric Ca/Ru ratio in the present CaRuO3 films. Also it is known that the non-stoichiometric films possess lattice parameters quite different from that of the bulk then the stoichiometric films21. We find that a unit cell volume (~231 Å3) of the present films is very close to that of the bulk (~228.5 Å3). On the other hand, the Ca-rich non-stoichiometric CRO/STO (100) films20 possess a significantly larger cell volume of ~242 Å3. This clearly suggests that all the films used in the present work possess close to ideal Ca/Ru ratio.

Figure 5. Resistivity (ρ) as a function of temperature (T) data for all the pure CaRuO3 films (main panel) and Cr-doped films (inset).

Figure 5

Hall resistivity measurements represent a reliable method of determining the carrier concentration, the sign of the charge carriers in conducting systems and the magnetic ground state22. The Hall resistivity (ρxy) in is commonly arises from the ordinary Hall effect (OHE) and the anomalous Hall effect (AHE), as given by the relation23,24

graphic file with name srep03877-m1.jpg

where B is the magnetic field. First and second terms on right-hand side originate from ordinary and anomalous Hall effects (ρOHE and ρAHE), respectively. R0 is coefficient of ρOHE which depends on carrier concentration via relation R0 = 1/(nq) [n - carrier density, and q - carrier charge]. The Rs is the coefficient of ρAHE, which arises from the sample magnetization. Also, the ρAHE scales with the magnetic moment and has its origin in spin-orbit interactions. The variation of ρOHE with magnetic field is linear as B ~ μoH. Any nonlinearity in ρxy as a function of magnetic field is attributed to the emergence of AHE. The ρAHE is directly proportional to sample magnetization. Hence, the nonlinear AHE contribution to the ρxy originates from the ferromagnetic order in the system. In the low-field regime, the contribution of OHE is generally negligible compared to the AHE. Hence, a non-zero value of ρAHE in low field regime points towards ferromagnetic order in the system23,24. To verify the magnetic ground state via anomalous Hall component in our samples, Hall measurement were performed on two CaRuO3 films, namely, a non-magnetic compressive-strained film on LaAlO3 (100) substrate [CRO/LAO] and a magnetic tensile-strained film on SrTiO3 (100) substrate [CRO/STO]. As seen in Figure 6, the CRO/LAO film exhibits linear variation of ρxy with the applied field. Also, there is switching in sign of charge carriers at about 50 K, however, albeit absence of any non-linear component (Fig. 6a). This is in agreement with existing report25. In the magnetic CRO/STO film, however, there is a distinctive non-linear behaviour in ρxy which arises from AHE having its origin in ferromagnetic ground state (Fig. 6b–c). Separation of OHE and AHE from the ρxy is done in the following way. The high-field slope of ρxy versus magnetic-field provides R0 as the high-field magnetization gets saturated (dM/dH ~ 0) and this contribution of ρxy depicts the behavioral trend of OHE. Furthermore, the sign of R0 suggests the type of charge carriers, i.e., the holes or the electrons. The anomalous component is determined by the extrapolation of high-field linear ρxy to H = 0. This extrapolated non-zero ρxy at H = 0 is the contribution from the AHE. We observed a distinct non-linear behavior in ρxy vs magnetic field below T = 60 K which manifests as a discernible “kink” in the vicinity of H = 2 T (see inset of Fig. 6c). This clearly signifies the induced FM order in CRO/STO film below 60 K. Above this temperature, the ρxy is linear and resembles with that of CRO/LAO film. The value of R0 obtained for CRO/STO sample at 5 K is 4.76 × 10−13 Ω-cm/Oe or equivalent to 4.7653 × 10−5 cm3/C. Using this data, a simple one-band model gives a carrier concentration of ~1.31 × 1023 holes/cm3. While the carrier concentration derived for 200 K is ~0.27 × 1023 holes/cm3. In case of CRO/LAO, the carrier concentrations thus obtained is ~0.32 × 1023 holes/cm3 at 200 K and ~0.15 × 1023 electrons/cm3 at 5 K. These values confirm the sign reversal of the carrier polarity for CRO/LAO whereas no such sign reversal of charge carriers was observed in CRO/STO. Overall, these Hall data provide an unambiguous proof to magnetization data depicting intrinsic ferromagnetic order in tensile strained CRO/STO films and absence of the same in compressive strained CRO/LAO film.

Figure 6. Magnetic field (H) dependent Hall resistivity ρxy at different temperature for (a) CRO/LAO film (b) High temperature regime of CRO/STO film (c) Low temperature regime of CRO/STO film. Inset shows the non linear behavior of ρxy for T = 5 K and 30 K in the vicinity of H ~ 2 T (d) Anomalous Hall resistivity (4πRsMs) as a function of magnetic field for CRO/STO film.

Figure 6

Non-magnetic CaRuO3 is a non-Fermi-liquid metal whereas its FM counterpart SrRuO3 exhibits a Fermi-liquid behavior. The magnetic ground state of CaRuO3 has been enigmatic for about past four decades. However, the present studies show that a FM order in this compound can be induced by manipulation of the structure. Now, to explore the consequent modifications in electronic properties of thus obtained FM CaRuO3 films, the temperature (T) dependence of resistivity (ρ) data were fitted to the empirical relation ρ = ρ0 + ATα where exponent α ~ 1.5 corresponds to non-Fermi liquid behavior and α ~ 2 corresponds to the Fermi-liquid behavior [Figure 7]. We found a clear relation between FM order and Fermi-liquid behavior in CaRuO3 films; the resistivity of non-magnetic CRO-B films with α ~ 1.23 is suggestive of near non-Fermi liquid behavior, whereas that of the FM CRO-D films shows α ~ 2 corresponding to the Fermi-liquid behavior. The resistivity of less ferromagnetic CRO-C films exhibits α ~ 1.76. These analyses clearly show that there is a gradual transition from a non-Fermi liquid to a Fermi-liquid behavior as we traverse from a non-magnetic to a ferromagnetic CaRuO3. In addition, there appears a clear similarity of the FM and Fermi-liquid behavior in CaRuO3 (CRO-D film) with the corresponding properties of well known SrRuO3.

Figure 7. Fitting of the resistivity data of CRO-B, CRO-C and CRO-D films to the empirical relation ρ = ρ0 + ATα.

Figure 7

Discussion

There are several studies, mostly theoretical, on understanding the magnetic ground state of CaRuO310,11,20,26,27,28. This is mainly because in bulk form it lacks any magnetic order whereas its magnetic analog SrRuO3 exhibits long range FM order. It was predicted that a FM order might set in CaRuO3 if by some appropriate means, chemical or physical, the tilt and rotation of RuO6 octahedra is reduced and the Ru-O-Ru bond distances and angles increased to match with those of the SrRuO311,27. A manifestation of the same was unambiguously realized by chemical means, i.e., via partial substitution of Ru both by magnetic ions16 as Cr or Fe and by non-magnetic ion6 as Ti. However, this technique has the drawback of transforming its metallic state to the semiconducting/insulating state. Zayak et al carried out detailed calculations of the correlations of epitaxial strain and magnetic moment in CaRuO320 and suggested that a FM CaRuO3 may be formed by the means of inducing the tensile strain and in which the FM magnetic moment increases with the increasing tensile strain. Compressive strain, whereas, does not induce the same effect. An increase in in-plane Ru-O-Ru bond distances and a decrease in covalent character are two essential factors to induce magnetic order in CaRuO3, which can be achieved by tensile strain. A tensile strain of 2% can induce a saturation magnetic moment of ~0.5 μB/f.u. In the present study, we find the experimental evidence to these theoretical predictions. It is clearly seen that a tensile strain of about 1% in CRO-C film induces a magnetic moment of ~0.06 μB/f.u. and an enhanced strain of about 1.5% in CRO-D films results in a magnetic moment ~0.26 μB/f.u. We could not form CaRuO3 films with higher tensile strain on substrate such as BaTiO3 (mismatch ~4%) and MgAl2O4 (mismatch ~6%). Indications of FM moment were found in pseudo-heterostructures of CaRuO329. However, in such cases it is difficult to assign the occurrence of magnetic moment to a particular phase. A small magnetic moment in pseudo-heterostructures was attributed to the cubic phase which coexisted with relaxed and coherent orthorhombic phases. In comparison to this, the present studies show manifestation of an FM order with a clear magnetic transition in tensile strained orthorhombic CaRuO3 single-phase films. On comparing the FM properties of CaRuO3 films with those of the SrRuO3, we noted that the magnetic moment of the former is lower than that of the latter. However, the most noteworthy feature is a magnetic coercivity of ~200–300 Oe of CaRuO3 of CaRuO3 films is considerably lower than coercivity in the vicinity of 10 kOe for SrRuO3.

In summary, we have fabricated magnetic CaRuO3 films with single structural form and with varying tensile strain. We explicitly showed that FM moment in CaRuO3 can be induced by the means of tensile strain and that the magnitude of magnetic moment increases with the tensile strain. These observations are consistent with the theoretical predictions. We further show that tensile strain is more efficient that chemical route to induce magnetic order in CaRuO3. These leaves an intriguing aspect open: is it possible to induce larger magnetic moment of up to 1 μB/f.u in CaRuO3 by adopting a combined approach of tensile epitaxial strain and optimal chemical substitutions? These studies also open up avenues to explore the utilization of tensile strained FM CaRuO3 vis-à-vis the FM SrRuO3 in spintronic and magnetic memory devices.

Methods

Sample preparation

Polycrystalline samples of CaRuO3 and CaRu0.9Cr0.1O3 were prepared by standard solid-state reaction route. The x-ray diffraction data confirmed the phase purity of both the samples. These samples were used for synthesis of thin films using pulsed laser deposition technique.

Sample characterization

The θ-2θ diffraction patterns were collected by using PanAnalytical X-ray diffractrometer. The ω-2θ reciprocal space maps (RSM) using a four axis cradle mounted on same diffractrometer were also obtained for detailed structural and strain analyses of the films. The thickness of the samples was deduced from the reflectivity measurements. The magnetization measurements were performed using superconducting quantum interference device magnetometer. The resistivity and Hall measurements were performed using the four-probe and Van der Pauw geometry in Quantum Design PPMS system. The Hall resistivity ρxy was measured as a function of the applied magnetic field (H = ±9 T) at a constant temperature (5 K to 300 K).

Author Contributions

D.S.R. conceived the project and designed the experiments in discussions with R.S.S., S.T. and R.R. S.T. and R.R. performed the syntheses and magnetization measurements. S.T., R.R., P.P. and S.K. analyzed the data. S.T. and S.K. performed the hall measurements. D.S.R., S.T., R.S.S. and S.K. wrote the paper. All authors contributed through scientific discussions.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Department of Science and Technology (DST), New Delhi under the research Project No. SR/S2/LOP-13/2010.

References

  1. Randall J. J. & Ward R. The Preparation of Some Ternary Oxides of the Platinum Metals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 81, 2629–2631 (1959). [Google Scholar]
  2. Longo J. M., Raccah P. M. & Goodenough J. B. Magnetic Properties of SrRuO3 and CaRuO3. J. Appl. Phys. 39, 1327–1328 (1968). [Google Scholar]
  3. Cao G., McCall S., Shepard M., Crow J. E. & Guertin R. P. Thermal, magnetic, and transport properties of single-crystal Sr1−xCaxRuO3 (0 < ~x < ~1.0). Phys. Rev. B 56, 321–329 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  4. Takahashi K. S. et al. Inverse tunnel magnetoresistance in all-perovskite junctions of La0.7Sr0.3MnO3/SrTiO3/SrRuO3. Phys. Rev. B 67, 094413 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  5. Klein L., Antognazza L., Geballe T. H., Beasley M. R. & Kapitulnik A. Possible non-Fermi-liquid behavior of CaRuO3. Phys. Rev. B 60, 1448–1451 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  6. He T. & Cava R. J. Disorder-induced ferromagnetism in CaRuO3. Phys. Rev. B 63, 172403 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  7. Shirako Y. et al. Magnetic properties of high-pressure phase of CaRuO3 with post-perovskite structure. J. Phys.: Conf. Series 215, 012038 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  8. Shepard M., Cao G., McCall S., Freibert F. & Crow J. E. Magnetic and transport properties of Na doped SrRuO3 and CaRuO3. J. Appl. Phys. 79, 4821–4823 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  9. Cao G., Freitbert F. & Crow J. E. Itinerant-to-localized electron transition in perovskite CaRu1−xRhxO3. J. Appl. Phys. 81, 3884–3886 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  10. Mazin I. I. & Singh D. J. Electronic structure and magnetism in Ru-based perovskites. Phys. Rev. B 56, 2556–2571 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  11. Maiti K. Role of covalency in the ground-state properties of perovskite ruthenates: A first-principles study using local spin density approximations. Phys. Rev. B 73, 235110 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  12. Maiti K. Singh R. S. & Medicherla V. R. R. Observation of particle hole asymmetry and phonon excitations in non-Fermi-liquid systems: A high-resolution photoemission study of ruthenetes. Europhys. Letts. 78, 17002 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  13. Yoshimura K. et al. 17O NMR Observation of Universal Behavior of Ferromagnetic Spin Fluctuations in the itinerant Magnetic System Sr1−xCaxRuO3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4397–4400 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  14. Shepard M., McCall S., Cao G. & Crow J. E. Thermodynamic properties of perovskite ARuO3(A = Ca, Sr, and Ba) single crystals. J. Appl. Phys. 81, 4978–4980 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  15. Hardy V., Raveau B., Retoux R., Barrier N. & Maignan A. Nature of the ferromagnetism induced by nonmagnetic substitutions on the Ru site of CaRuO3. Phys. Rev. B 73, 094418 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  16. He T. & Cava R. J. The effect of Ru-site dopants on the magnetic properties of CaRuO3. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 13, 8347–8361 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  17. Maignan A., Raveau B., Hardy V., Barrier N. & Retoux R. Ferromagnetism induced by chromium substitution in the CaRuO3 perovskite. Phys. Rev. B 74, 024410 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  18. Durairaj V. et al. Highly anisotropic magnetism in Cr-doped perovskite ruthenates. Phys. Rev. B 73, 214414 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  19. Ranjan R. et al. Magneto-structural study of a Cr-doped CaRuO3. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21, 326001 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Zayak A. T., Huang X., Neaton J. B. & Rabe K. M. Manipulating magnetic properties of SrRuO3 and CaRuO3 with epitaxial and uniaxial strains. Phys. Rev. B 77, 214410 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  21. Rao R. A. et al. M. Strain stabilized metal–insulator transition in epitaxial thin films of metallic oxide CaRuO3. Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 3035–3037 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  22. Parashar N. D., Rangaraju N., Lazarov V. K., Xie S. & Wessels B. W. High-temperature ferromagnetism in epitaxial (In,Mn)Sb films. Phys. Rev. B 81, 115321 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  23. Mathieu R. et al. Scaling of the Anomalous Hall Effect in Sr1−xCaxRuO3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 016602 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  24. Toyosaki H. et al. Anomalous Hall effect governed by electron doping in a room-temperature transparent ferromagnetic semiconductor. Nature Mater. 3, 221–224 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gausepohl S. C., Lee M., Rao R. A. & Eom C. B. Hall-effect sign reversal in CaRuO3 and SrRuO3 thin films. Phys. Rev. B 54, 8996–8999 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Jakobi E., Kanungo S., Sarkar S., Schmitt S. & Dasgupta T. S. LDA + DMFT study of Ru-based perovskite SrRuO3 and CaRuO3. Phys. Rev. B 83, 041103(R) (2011). [Google Scholar]
  27. Middey S., Mahadevan P. & Sarma D. D. Dependence of magnetism on GdFeO3 distortion in the t2g system ARuO3 (A = Sr, Ca). Phys. Rev. B 83, 014416 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  28. Maiti K. & Singh R. S. Evidence against strong correlation in 4d transition-metal oxides CaRuO3 and SrRuO3. Phys. Rev. B 71, 161102 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  29. Chen Y. B. et al. Microstructure and ferromagnetic property in CaRuO3 thin films with pseudoheterostructure. Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 182502 (2010). [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES