Sympathetic nervous system in obesity-related hypertension: mechanisms and clinical implications

Abstract

Obesity markedly increases the risk of hypertension and cardiovascular disease, which may be related to activation of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS). Sympathetic overactivity directly and indirectly contributes to blood pressure (BP) elevation in obesity, including stimulation of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS). The adipocyte-derived peptide leptin suppresses appetite, increases thermogenesis, but also raises SNS activity and BP. Obese individuals exhibit hyperleptinemia but are resistant to its appetite-suppressing actions. Interestingly, animal models of obesity exhibit preserved sympathoexcitatory and pressor actions of leptin, despite resistance to its anorexic and metabolic actions, suggesting selective leptin resistance. Disturbance of intracellular signaling at specific hypothalamic neural networks appears to underlie selective leptin resistance. Delineation of these pathways should lead to novel approaches to treatment. In the meantime, treatment of obesity–hypertension has relied on antihypertensive drugs. Although sympathetic blockade is mechanistically attractive in obesity–hypertension, in practice its effects are disappointing because of adverse metabolic effects and inferior outcomes. On the basis of subgroup analyses of obese patients in large randomized clinical trials, drugs such as diuretics and RAAS blockers appear superior in preventing cardiovascular events in obesity–hypertension. An underused alternative approach to obesity–hypertension is induction of weight loss, which reduces circulating leptin and insulin, partially reverses resistance to these hormones, decreases sympathetic activation and improves BP and other risk factors. Though weight loss induced by lifestyle is often modest and transient, carefully selected pharmacological weight loss therapies can produce substantial and sustained antihypertensive effects additive to lifestyle interventions.

The incidence of obesity has increased dramatically, particularly in developed countries, such as the United States and Japan.^1,2 Obesity accelerates atherosclerosis and increases coronary and stroke morbidity and mortality³ Most of these are mediated by cardiovascular risk factors, especially systolic hypertension.⁴ The prevalence of hypertension in middle-aged obese humans (body mass index >30 kgm⁻²) is 40–50%.⁵ There are substantial data suggesting that activation of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) has a key role in obesity–hypertension. We review evidence linking obesity and the SNS, pathways by which the SNS elevates blood pressure (BP), mechanisms for SNS activation in obesity and therapeutic implications.

OBESITY AND SYMPATHETIC ACTIVATION

In animal models, obese dogs fed a high-fat diet develop sodium retention and hypertension. Renal denervation prevents both, indicating that renal nerves have an critical role in obesity-related hypertension.⁶ There are also data that sympathoactivation precedes development of obesity in animal models prone to adiposity. BP, renal tissue norepinephrine content and renin expression are increased in the obesity-prone offspring of obese rats.⁷ In human obesity, increased circulating catecholamines have been demonstrated.⁸ Moreover, there is an augmented SNS contribution for maintenance of arterial pressure in obese compared with lean normotensive and hypertensive subjects.^9,10

However, these data do not permit elucidation of region-specific sympathetic tone, nor the mechanisms by which BP is elevated by the SNS. Increased sympathetic neural drive in obese humans has been demonstrated in skeletal muscle (microneurography) and kidney (norepinephrine spillover),^11,12 suggesting that vasoconstriction and renal mechanisms are both involved. But there is also evidence that sympathetic activation in obesity is not generalized.¹² There is also evidence that regionally increased sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) does not always translate into direct vascular effects.

Peripheral sympathetic vascular tone in obesity

Many studies have demonstrated increased SNA to skeletal muscle (mSNA) in human obesity.^11,13 However, the function of this elevated mSNA is unknown, though it is widely assumed that it contributes to vasoconstriction and thus obesity-related hypertension. We have tested the hypothesis that sympathetically mediated vascular tone is increased in humans with obesity. In agreement with prior studies, we showed that mSNA in upper and lower limbs was significantly higher (~40%) in obese compared with lean normotensive subjects.¹⁴ Interestingly, obese and lean subjects had similar vasoconstrictor responses to α-adrenoceptor agonism. Importantly, despite increased mSNA, vasodilatation of forearm resistance vessels to complete α-adrenergic blockade with intra-arterial phentolamine was completely normal in obese normotensive subjects.¹⁴ We subsequently demonstrated that forearm vasodilator responses to phentolamine were not increased in obese hypertensives compared with lean subjects. In fact, such responses were somewhat lower in obese hypertensive subjects than in lean hypertensives.¹⁵ In addition, weight loss did not reduce vasodilator responses to phentolamine in obese hypertensive subjects, despite reducing mSNA and arterial pressure. This is opposite of what would be expected if obesity-related sympathoactivation directly increases limb vascular tone through activation of α-adrenergic receptors on resistance-artery vascular smooth muscle cells.^16,17

How can this perplexing and apparently contradictory finding of dissociation between vascular tone and sympathetic outflow be explained? First, it is possible that endothelial dysfunction could lead to increased vascular tone that could augment an initially decreased phentolamine-induced vasodilatation; however, dilatation to isoproterenol (a selective β₂-adrenoreceptor agonist) and nitroprusside (nitric oxide donor) was not reduced in obese subjects.¹⁴ Second, sustained elevation of mSNA in obesity could lead to downregulation of α-adrenergic receptors and reduction of sympathetic vascular tone; however, there is preserved α-adrenergic vasoconstrictor sensitivity in obese subjects.¹⁴ Third, the modest changes in SNA observed in obesity (~40%) may not be sufficient to increase vascular tone and may subserve other functions (that is, metabolic). The last explanation has some corroborating evidence in studies of single-fiber versus multiple-fiber sympathetic nerve discharge patterns in obesity. Although obese normotensive and hypertensive subjects both exhibit increased multifiber mSNA, obese subjects do not show increased firing activity of single SNA fibers compared with lean controls.¹³ This might suggest that additional sympathetic neurons are ‘recruited’ in obesity, but that they do not subserve vasoconstriction. Clearly, increased multifiber sympathetic discharge rate could be derived from sympathetic neurons innervating muscle or fat, rather than blood vessels. These may mediate metabolic functions, such as lipid oxidation¹⁸ or thermogenesis. Thus, our work and that of others suggest that inferences regarding vascular tone drawn from multifiber recordings of mSNA may be misleading in obesity, and that increased SNA does not necessarily translate into increased vascular tone in obesity. Importantly, because data from systemic SNS blockade indicate an increased sympathetic contribution to BP and vascular resistance in obesity,^9,10 other pressor actions of SNA must be having a role. Such actions would presumably be able to increase BP without increases in vascular smooth muscle contraction via binding of norepinephrine to α-adrenoreceptors.

Links between the sympathetic and renin–angiotensin–aldosterone systems

It is tempting to implicate the actions of the SNS on sodium balance, as the resistance-vessel-independent mechanism contributes to obesity-related hypertension. However, acute sympathetic blockade causes an exaggerated decrease in BP and systemic vascular resistance in obesity–hypertension before changes in sodium balance can occur.⁹ An intriguing possibility is that increased SNA activates the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS). Classically, the SNS rapidly activates the RAAS through β-adrenoceptor-mediated release of renin from the renal juxtaglomerular apparatus. Activation of the RAAS by the SNA may also occur slowly through upregulation of adipocyte angiotensinogen (AGT) generation (Figure 1). For instance, dietary carbohydrate activates white adipose tissue SNA, and significantly increases adipose AGT gene expression, which is abolished by sym-pathectomy.¹⁹ Biological responses to β-adrenergic stimulation in adipose cells are mediated by intracellular cyclic AMP, which stimulates AGTmRNA levels and protein.²⁰ Obese subjects have evidence of circulating and tissue RAAS activation, and weight loss attenuates this.^21–27 Thus, although the direct vascular effects of sympathetic activation in obesity may have been overestimated, indirect effects on renal sodium retention, increased cardiac output and activation of the RAAS may have been underestimated (Figure 1). This would explain the apparently contradictory finding of dissociation between vascular tone and sympathetic outflow, and have implications for the treatment of obesity-related hypertension.

Figure 1.

Possible pathways for activation of the renin–angiotensin– aldosterone system in obesity. Obesity-related increases in sympathetic nerve activity can acutely release activated renin from the kidney, and more chronically though stimulation of adipose-tissue angiotensinogen generation. Angiotensin II (Ang II) then stimulates aldosterone (Aldo) production from the adrenal cortex. Both Ang II and Aldo can then have deleterious effects on blood vessels and blood pressure.

MECHANISMS BY WHICH OBESITY INCREASES SNA

There are multiple neurohumoral mechanisms by which obesity can activate the SNS. Neural mechanisms include direct activation of the SNA in response to activation of higher cerebral centers by hunger or feeding, and renal afferent nerve activation mediated by perirenal fat accumulation and kidney compression. Among humoral mediators, the preponderance of evidence suggests a particularly important role for leptin in the development of obesity-induced hypertension (see below). This review focuses on leptin, but we briefly discuss some other mediators first, including insulin, glucocorticoids, endocannabinoids, ghrelin and adiponectin.

Obesity and hypertension are both associated with increasing insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia. The effects of insulin on BP control are multifactorial, including a direct antinatriuretic action and sympathetic activation. In a series of landmark papers, Mark and colleagues at our institution demonstrated that hyperinsulinemia causes sympathetic activation in humans.²⁸ Though hypertensive or elderly subjects exhibit resistance to the glucose uptake (and vasodilator) effects of insulin^29,30, they have preserved insulin-mediated sympathoactivation (that is, selective insulin resistance). One could therefore hypothesize that as obesity develops, hyperinsulinemia could contribute to sympathetic activation. We have also shown in rodents that central nervous system administration of insulin increases sympathetic nerve outflow to the hind limb, brown adipose tissue, kidney and adrenal gland.³¹ Importantly, regulation of sympathetic outflow to brown adipose tissue is mediated by neuronal intracellular activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase, whereas outflow to the hind limb is mediated by phosphoinositol kinase activation. Thus, it could be possible in the future to develop therapeutic interventions to prevent insulin-induced sympathetic activation.

Glucocorticoids are known to increase food intake, fat accumulation, insulin resistance and decrease energy expenditure.³² Glucocorticoids also cause hypertension via multiple mechanisms: activating the mineralocorticoid receptor in the kidney and perhaps via upregulation of the angiotensin receptors and alteration of sodium and calcium influx into cells or action on vascular smooth muscle.^33,34 Importantly, suppression of corticotrophin releasing factor using prolonged dexamethasone administration inhibits the SNS in obese, although not lean, subjects, suggesting a role for hypophyseal corticotrophin releasing factor in the sympathoexcitation of obesity.³⁵ However, such increased corticotrophin releasing factor could be secondary to changes in leptin levels or resistance.

Endocannabinoids are fatty-acid derivatives that activate cannabinoid receptors and alter food intake and metabolism.³⁶ Endocannabinoid administration causes appetite initiation in mice.³⁷ Obese human subjects have upregulation of the endocannabinoid system.³⁸ The endocannabinergic system has a role in human hypertension, and cannabinoids and their analogs have hypotensive and depressor effects, acting both directly and indirectly on myocardium and vasculature.³⁹ Spontaneously hypertensive rats exhibit reduced cannabinoid-1 receptor density, which appears to contribute to their elevated sympathetic tone.⁴⁰ Rimonabant, a selective cannabinoid type 1 receptor blocker, was shown to modestly decrease BP. After 1 year of rimonabant treatment, there was a 1.1mmHg placebo-adjusted decrease in systolic BP.⁴¹ However, such decreases would be expected from any drug causing weight loss. Defective leptin signaling is associated with increased hypothalamic levels of endocannabinoids in obese mice and Zucker rats.⁴² When leptin was administered to normal and obese rats, it reduced endocannabinoids in the hypothalamus, indicating the endocannabinoid actions may be regulated by leptin.⁴² Thus, as with CRF, changes in endocannabinoids may be related to changes in leptin levels or sensitivity caused by obesity.

Ghrelin, a 28-amino-acid growth-hormone-releasing peptide secreted by the stomach, causes weight gain in rodents by increasing food intake.⁴³ However, circulating ghrelin levels are decreased in obese humans, arguing against a central role for ghrelin in causation of common obesity.^44,45 Importantly, ghrelin infusion decreases BP by 5–10mmHg,⁴⁶ although it also increases SNS activity, perhaps through compensatory baroreflex activation.⁴⁶ Untreated hypertensive subjects exhibit decreased circulating ghrelin concentrations.⁴⁷ A polymorphism in the ghrelin gene is associated with increased risk of hypertension, although no ghrelin halotypes are associated with BP or body mass index.⁴⁸ Thus, it seems plausible that the low ghrelin concentrations observed in common obesity could contribute to obesity-related hypertension. Interestingly, plasma ghrelin levels are elevated in subjects with Prader–Willi Syndrome, and could be a causative factor in the development of obesity.⁴⁹ About 40% of adults with Prader–Willi syndrome develop hypertension, suggesting that elevated ghrelin levels are not sufficient to prevent obesity-related increases in BP.⁵⁰

Adipocytes produce multiple peptides that may have a role in increased SNS activity. The most important are adiponectin and leptin. Others include visfatin and cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-α, but these have less robust evidence linking to hypertension. Adiponectin is a 247-amino-acid protein and a major cytokine abundantly synthesized by adipose tissue that regulates lipid and glucose metabolism. High levels of adiponectin improve insulin resistance, dyslipidemia and atherosclerosis. Adiponectin reduces efferent sympathetic nerve traffic to the kidney and BP in rodents.⁵¹ Higher circulating adiponectin levels are associated with lower BP in humans.^52–54 Metabolic syndrome and hypertension are associated with low adiponectin levels.^55,56 Importantly, subjects with low adiponectin levels exhibit cardiac sympathetic overactivity.⁵⁷ Adiponectin gene polymorphisms are associated with the combination of metabolic syndrome and hypertension in Taiwanese subjects. Such association was not seen in subjects with hypertension alone or normotensive subjects with metabolic syndrome.⁵⁸ Most recently, adiponectin has been shown to be an independent predictor of coronary heart disease in the Framingham offspring study.^59,60

Leptin, a 167-amino-acid hormone, predominantly secreted by adipose tissue, inhibits feeding behavior and increases sympathetically mediated thermogenesis. Thus, leptin functions as an adipostat hormone that should maintain adipose tissue mass stability through a negative feedback mechanism (Figure 2). Leptin has multiple actions, including direct effects on the endocrine, vascular, hematopoietic, immune and musculoskeletal systems in addition to anorexia and thermogenesis. Leptin-dependent increases in SNA to brown adipose tissue promote thermogenic metabolism and contribute to leptin-induced weight loss.⁶¹ Leptin has also been shown to increase SNA to the kidneys, adrenal glands and hind limbs in rats.⁶² We and others have shown that chronic increases in systemic or central nervous system leptin concentrations increase BP in rodents, which is preventable by adrenergic receptor blockade.^63–66 Leptin appears to have the most robust evidence linking it to the development of obesity-related hypertension, including rodent, epidemiological and genetic data. For example, the extremely rare cases of genetic leptin deficiency are not only associated with early severe obesity, but also with normal BP and orthostatic hypotension.^67,68 Moreover, a leptin gene polymorphism has been linked to increased risk for developing hypertension independent of obesity.⁶⁹ In addition, rodents with selective knockout of leptin receptors in hypothalamic proopiomelanocortin neurons exhibit obesity and insulin resistance but without the usual hypertension.⁷⁰ Furthermore, epidemiological data suggest a clear link between leptin and BP, which is clearly independent of obesity.⁷¹ This association appears to be more apparent in children, which could suggest an initiating role for leptin.⁷² Importantly, 50–60% of the association between body mass index and BP pressure variance can be explained by variance in leptin levels.^72,73 Together, these data suggest that leptin is a necessary intermediary in the development of SNS activation and hypertension, although other mediators could still contribute to lesser degrees.

Figure 2.

Biological roles of leptin. Leptin is secreted by adipocytes and circulates in the blood in a concentration proportional to fat mass content. In addition to regulation of appetite, thermogenesis and body weight, leptin has multiple other biological actions. The binding of leptin to its receptor in the hypothalamus inhibits food intake and increases energy expenditure through stimulation of sympathetic nerve activity(SNA). Leptin has multiple other functions, either directly through action in peripheral tissues or through activation of thermogenic and cardiorenal SNA.

LEPTIN SIGNALING

Leptin actions occur mainly through activation of central nervous system pathways starting in the hypothalamus. The binding of leptin to its receptor (Lrb) leads to conformational changes, and promotes intracellular activation of Janus kinase 2, which phosphorylates the Src homology-2 domains of the signal transducer and activator of transcription protein type 3 (STAT3). Phosphorylated STAT3 dimerizes, enters the nucleus, binds to promoter regions and regulates gene expression. In addition to triggering the Janus kinase–STAT3 pathway, binding of leptin to LRb also activates phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase,⁷⁴ mitogen-activated protein kinase⁷⁵ and the ATP-sensitive K-channel (Figure 3). Activation of each of these pathways contributes to the anorexic effects of leptin.^74–76

Figure 3.

Molecular mechanisms involved in leptin receptor signaling in the hypothalamus. Leptin modulates gene transcription via the activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) proteins, phosphoinositol 3 kinase (PI3K) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK). The PI3K pathway is also involved in modulation of neuronal firing rate via activation of membrane potassium–ATP channels (K_ATP). IRS2, insulin receptor substrate type 2; JAK2, Janus kinase 2; LRb, long splice variant leptin receptor isoform; Shp2, sulfhydryl-domain containing protein tyrosine phosphatase.

In the hypothalamus, leptin promotes the expression of proopiomelanocortin and thus α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone, and suppresses the expression of agouti-related protein.⁷⁷ In peripheral tissues, leptin activates transcription of genes encoding for enzymes that participate in lipid metabolism, such as carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1, acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase, acyl-coenzyme A oxidase and fatty acid synthase.⁷⁸

SELECTIVE LEPTIN RESISTANCE

Obese individuals exhibit hyperleptinemia due to an increase in adipocyte mass, but remain obese, indicating leptin resistance. Indeed, both human studies and experimental murine models of polygenic obesity have demonstrated resistance to the anorexic and weight-lowering effects of leptin. If leptin contributes to hypertension, then at least some of its actions on the SNS would have to be preserved in the face of such resistance (selective leptin resistance). There is increasing evidence that this indeed occurs. For example, monogenic obese Agouti mice (A^y) exhibit resistance to the metabolic effects of leptin (that is, less satiety and less weight loss), but have relative preservation of leptin-induced renal sympathoactivation.^79,80 Thus, leptin resistance in the A^y mouse is selective and confined to certain metabolic actions of leptin, whereas the hormone’s sympathetic actions remain unaffected. Importantly, selective leptin resistance is not restricted to A^y mice with monogenic obesity.

In our laboratory, C57BL/6J mice with diet-induced obesity responded poorly to the satiety and lipopenic effects of chronic leptin administration.⁷⁵ Similar to previous results with A^y mice, the renal sympathetic response to either systemic or central neural administration of leptin was similar in polygenic obese and control mice, despite metabolic leptin resistance in the obese. Interestingly, leptin-induced SNA to brown adipose tissue and skeletal muscle was also blunted in obese mice. The preservation of leptin-induced sympathetic activation to the kidneys might predispose obese animals to hypertension, whereas the inhibition of leptin-dependent sympathoactivation to the brown adipose tissue and skeletal muscle could theoretically impair thermogenic metabolism and aggravate obesity (Figure 4). Importantly, the pressor effect of leptin was preserved in diet-induced obese mice, despite metabolic leptin resistance. Obesity induced by 10 weeks of a high-fat diet increased mean BP by about 10mmHg in conscious mice implanted with radiotelemetry probes.⁸¹ Furthermore, systemic leptin treatment for 12 days increased mean BP by about 10mmHg in both lean and obese animals, demonstrating preserved pressor actions of leptin in animals resistant to the anorexic and thermogenic effects of leptin. Together, these results raise the attractive hypothesis that renal sympathoexcitatory effects of leptin could contribute to hypertension despite metabolic leptin resistance (Figure 3).

Figure 4.

Mechanisms of selective leptin resistance. In lean conditions, leptin acts in the hypothalamus to decrease food intake and increase thermogenesis, as well as increase sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) to non-thermogenic organs (left). Increasing evidence suggests that these actions can be dissociated in obesity (right), with resistance to the anorexic and thermogenic effects of leptin (mediated through the arcuate nucleus) but with preservation of cardiorenal sympathoactivation (mediated through medial hypothalamic nuclei (VMH and DMH)). This phenomenon might explain, in part, how hyperleptinemia could be accompanied by obesity (partial loss of appetite and metabolic actions of leptin) but still contribute to sympathetic overactivity and hypertension because of preservation of the sympathetic actions of leptin to some organs involved in blood pressure regulation (for example, the kidney). Arc, arcuate nucleus; DMH, dorsomedial hypothalamus; VMH, ventromedial hypothalamus.

MECHANISMS OF SELECTIVE LEPTIN RESISTANCE

Experimental evidence indicates that leptin-dependent sympathetic outflow acting on metabolism and the cardiovascular system do not share common neuronal or molecular mechanisms. We have demonstrated that although intracerebral administration of leptin increases brown adipose tissue and renal SNA simultaneously, co-treatment with a melanocortin-4 receptor antagonist inhibits only sympathoactivation to brown adipose tissue, preserving leptin-activated sympathetic response to the kidneys.⁸² In addition, mice without the gene for the melanocortin-4 receptor exhibit decreased leptin-induced renal sympathoactivation.⁷⁴ On the other hand, leptin-dependent SNA to thermogenic brown adipose tissue is inhibited by blockade of corticotrophin-releasing factor.⁶³ These results indicate that sympathetic output to thermogenic brown adipose tissue is conveyed through hypothalamic pathways distinct from those that mediate sympathetic modulation of cardiorenal function. We have also shown that baroreflex activation suppresses leptin-induced SNA to the kidney, but that leptin-induced sympathetic output to thermogenic tissue is not inhibited by the baroreflex.⁸³ These results indicate that cardiorenal sympathetic regulation—but not thermogenesis—is influenced by baroreflex signals; confirming the independence of the cardiorenal and thermogenic sympathetic effects of leptin.

In addition, the anorexic and lipopenic effects of leptin appear to be mediated by neural networks relayed through the arcuate nucleus (a collection of neurons in the mediobasal hypothalamus), whereas the sympathetic and cardiovascular actions of leptin appear to be associated with neuronal activation of the ventromedial and dorsomedial hypothalamus (Figure 3).⁸⁴ It has been proposed that the arcuate nucleus, being less insulated from the systemic circulation by the blood–brain barrier than other hypothalamic areas, would be particularly influenced by serum leptin and other circulating factors.⁸⁵ Indeed, at the molecular level, STAT3-dependent signaling pathways in the arcuate nucleus are depressed in murine models of diet-induced obesity, possibly due to increased expression of inhibitory SOCS3, whereas other hypothalamic and extrahypothalamic nuclei remain leptin sensitive.⁸⁶ Activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase might be an alternative arcuate neuron signaling pathway that is altered in the obese state; pharmacological inhibition of mitogen-activated protein kinase mimics the pattern of selective leptin resistance, namely, loss of the anorexic and thermogenic effects of leptin with preservation of renal sympathoactivation.⁸⁷

Another molecular candidate mechanism for leptin resistance is protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B). In vitro evidence indicates that PTP1B regulates leptin-dependent signaling by dephosphorylation of Janus kinase 2 and STAT3.⁸⁸ Additionally, PTP1B reduces expression of STAT3 mRNA.⁸⁹ In vivo studies in PTP1B-deficient mice show increased sensitivity to the weight-loss effects of leptin.⁹⁰ Treatment with a PTP1B inhibitor improves leptin-dependent suppression of food intake in leptin-resistant ageing rats.⁹¹ Nevertheless, unlike SOCS3, dysregulation of hypothalamic PTP1B has not been demonstrated in experimental models of obesity.⁸⁵

Another possible pathway to explain leptin resistance would be via increased endoplasmic reticulum stress and unfolded protein response in the hypothalamus.⁹² Mice with pharmacologically induced endoplasmic reticulum stress show severe leptin resistance and augmented obesity on a high-fat diet. One of the main regulators of unfolded protein response is X-box binding protein-1, although modulators for X-box binding protein-1 are poorly understood. A severe defect in X-box binding protein-1 translocation to the nucleus is seen in leptin-deficient obese ob/ob mice, and provides a mechanism for development of endoplasmic reticulum stress.⁹³

LEPTIN AND OBESITY-RELATED HYPERTENSION IN HUMANS

Most obese individuals are leptin resistant and exhibit compensatory hyperleptinemia from high adipose tissue mass. If the concept of selective leptin resistance holds in obese humans, it would be plausible that hyperleptinemia contributes to obesity-related sympathoactivation and hypertension, despite resistance to leptin’s anorexic effects. Indeed, epidemiological studies have shown positive correlations between leptin and BP. Circulating leptin correlates with BP and hypertension in multiple populations, including white Europeans, Hispanic and Japanese. It is important to bear in mind that these are association studies, which do not necessarily prove a causal link between leptin and BP. However, several reports have demonstrated associations between circulating leptin and BP, independent of obesity, for example in lean subjects⁹⁴, and after correction for body mass index,^95,96 waist circumference⁹⁶ and other measures of adiposity.^94–99

Human studies demonstrating unequivocal effects of leptin on the SNS have not been conducted. However, renal norepinephrine spillover is significantly correlated with leptinemia in overweight/ obese men (correlation coefficient=0.63; P<0.01).¹⁰⁰ In apparent contradiction, another study showed that leptin administration to normal-weight individuals did not change plasma or urinary catecholamine levels, although these are poor indicators of systemic sympathetic activity.¹⁰¹ However, leptin given for weight maintenance reverses cardiac and renal sympathetic suppression caused by weight loss.¹⁰² Larger studies in which exogenous leptin was administered to obese individuals have been conducted, but no detailed evaluation of sympathetic activity or BP responses were reported.

THERAPEUTIC IMPLICATIONS

Optimal therapy for obesity–hypertension is not yet clear, in part because its mechanisms are not fully elucidated. Blockade of the SNS would be attractive in theory based on the mechanistic data presented above. Our discussion of therapy will focus on two questions. First, are there specific classes of antihypertensive medications that work better or have fewer side effects in obesity-hypertension? Second, what are the BP effects of weight loss interventions, whether lifestyle, surgical or pharmacological?

Antihypertensive pharmacotherapy in obesity–hypertension

There are no data to suggest enhanced BP-lowering efficacy for specific classes of antihypertensive drugs in obese compared with lean subjects, with the possible exception of combined alpha- and beta-adrenoceptor blockade. However, it is clear whether non-adrenergic blocking agents have outcome advantages in hypertension, and these persist in obese subjects with hypertension. In addition, some antihypertensive classes (particularly antiadrenergics) have metabolic side effects that may be particularly undesirable in obesity.

β-Adrenoceptor blockers exercise antihypertensive effects by decreasing cardiac output and renin activity. Though these mechanisms would seem to be ideal for obesity–hypertension, β-blockers have disadvantages. Though β-blockers were shown to reduce stroke compared with placebo in hypertension,¹⁰³ they have also been shown to be inferior to angiotensin AT₁ receptor blocker (ARB)-and calcium channel blocker (CCB)-based regimens in reducing events in the Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension Study and Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT) trials.^104,105 Importantly, β-blockers prevented significantly fewer events than these other classes in subgroup analyses restricted to obese subjects.^105,106 The inferiority of β-blockers may relate to several factors, including weight gain (3–4 kg on long-term use), type 2 diabetes, low high-density lipoprotein and high triglycerides.^103,107 β-Blockers also lessen exercise tolerance and cause erectile dysfunction. Some of these side effects of β-blockers may be ameliorated by the so-called ‘vasodilator’ β-blockers (nebivolol and carvedilol); however, these agents lack outcome trials.^108,109 Because β-blockers have inferior outcomes in obese subjects, and possess metabolic and other side effects that are particularly undesirable in obesity, this class should not be used as first-line therapy.

α-adrenoreceptor antagonists reduce BP through blockade of sympathetic vasoconstrictor tone on arterioles. It has been argued that because obesity is associated with increased sympathetic outflow, blockade of peripheral sympathetic tone would be advantageous. However, as discussed earlier, we have shown that complete forearm α-adrenergic receptor blockade causes similar vasodilatation in obese and lean subjects, with and without hypertension.^14,110 These data would suggest that there is no physiological rationale for using α-blockade alone in obesity–hypertension. Combined α- and β-blockade has been shown to reduce mean arterial BP to a greater extent in obese than in lean hypertensive subjects (−15 versus −7mmHg), though systolic and diastolic BP differences were not significant.¹⁰ However, unlike β-blockers, α-blockers have never been shown to reduce cardiovascular events compared with placebo. In addition, an α-blocker-based regimen using doxazosin was inferior to a thiazide-diuretic-based regimen using chlorthalidone in reduction of cardiovascular events and heart failure in the large Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) study,¹¹¹ even though ~30% also received a β-blocker.¹¹² α-Blockers remained inferior to chlorthalidone in subgroup analyses restricted to (mainly obese) subjects with metabolic syndrome or glucose intolerance in the ALLHAT study, with 20–40% more cardiovascular events and strokes.^113,114 This inferiority occurred despite the fact that α-blockers improve both dyslipidemia and glycemia.¹¹¹ The adverse effect profile of α-blockers includes orthostatic hypotension, headache, edema and flushing. These do not appear to be specifically worse in obese subjects. Given the lack of a physiological rationale for therapy, no evidence for benefit versus placebo and more cardiovascular events in obese subjects than thiazides, α-adrenoceptor antagonism should be avoided in obese hypertensive patients.

The centrally acting antihypertensives clonidine, methyldopa and moxonidine reduce sympathetic outflow by stimulating brainstem α-adrenoreceptors and imidazoline receptors. They reduce BP by decreasing vascular resistance and cardiac output. Moxonidine improves lipids and glucose in subjects with metabolic syndrome.¹¹⁵ There is no evidence that these agents reduce cardiovascular events in patients with obesity or hypertension. Adverse effects, including weight gain, impotence, depression, sedation and rebound hypertension, limit their use. Given the lack of evidence for benefits on outcomes, and their adverse effect profiles, these centrally acting agents should not be used in obesity–hypertension, unless other classes have been exhausted.

CCBs reduce the influx of ionic calcium across voltage-gated L-type calcium channels in arterial smooth muscle and myocardial cells, thereby decreasing peripheral vascular resistance. Some also possess negative inotropic and chronotropic effects. In the ASCOT trial, an amlodipine-based CCB regimen improved high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, weight, triglycerides, creatinine and glucose compared with a β-blocker-based regime. The CCB-based regimen also prevented more cardiovascular events and induced less diabetes than the atenolol-based regimen, including in analyses restricted to patients with obesity–hypertension.¹⁰⁵ However, a detailed subgroup analysis of the ALLHAT study showed that metabolic syndrome patients (n=23 077) treated with amlodipine had a substantial and significant 25–50% higher risk of heart failure than those treated with chlorthalidone.¹¹³ The excess risk from amlodipine was higher for black subjects, but still elevated in non-blacks.¹¹³ Amlodipine was similar to chlorthalidone in terms of preventing stroke, cardiovascular events and renal failure in metabolic syndrome patients.¹¹³ Adverse effects of CCBs include flushing, headache and pedal edema that are no worse in obese patients, and they lack metabolic side effects that would be problematic in obesity. Given the evidence base, CCBs would seem to have advantages in obese patients, though perhaps secondary to chlorthalidone.

Drugs that act on RAAS include angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), ARBs, direct renin inhibitors and aldosterone receptor antagonists. Such drugs lower BP through multiple mechanisms, including reductions in vascular resistance and natriuresis. In obese hypertensives, treatment with an ACEI, ARB or direct renin inhibitor has been shown to have identical BP-lowering efficacy as compared with treatment with a CCB, thiazide or β-blocker.^{109,116–119} In terms of cardiovascular outcomes, combined CCB and ACEI treatment was superior to combined β-blocker and diuretic in the ASCOT trial, even in analyses restricted to obese patients. However, subgroup analysis in the ALLHAT trial showed that ACEI (without CCB) was inferior to thiazide in prevention of heart failure in metabolic syndrome patients (n=23077), with 20–49% more events depending on race.¹¹³ Moreover, ACEI was significantly inferior to thiazide in preventing combined cardiovascular disease events in metabolic syndrome patients (10–20% more events). Black patients with metabolic syndrome (n=7327) did particularly bad with ACEI compared with thiazide treatment for all comparisons, but especially in terms of stroke (37% more) and end-stage renal disease (70% more events).¹¹³ Adverse effects caused by ACEIs (but not ARBs) include cough and angioedema; these are not exaggerated in obesity, but are more frequent in black patients. Relevant to obesity, ACEI and ARB appear to prevent type 2 diabetes mellitus¹²⁰ and provide renoprotection in patients with diabetes. On the basis of animal studies, aldosterone has been implicated as a potential contributing factor in obesity–hypertension. Unblinded observational studies suggest substantial benefit of aldosterone receptor antagonists in resistant hypertensives with obesity; however, randomized comparisons are few and do not show appreciable additional efficacy.¹²¹ Visceral obesity does appear to predict a better response to aldosterone blockade.¹²² In general, drugs that block RAAS do not appear to be superior to thiazide diuretics for treatment of obesity–hypertension, though they may offer some advantages in non-black patients with, or at high risk of developing, type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Diuretics work by reducing intravascular volume and cardiac output. Thiazide diuretics are the most commonly used, and chlorthalidone appears to be superior to hydrochlorothiazide.¹²³ All diuretic classes stimulate the SNS and RAAS. Antihypertensive efficacy is similar for hydrochlorothiazide versus ACEI or ARB in obese hypertensive patients.^109,116 In the ALLHAT study, patients with metabolic syndrome had significantly fewer cardiovascular events with chlorthalidone compared with α-blocker (which had 18–37% more events) and ACEI (which had 10–24% more events); chlorthalidone was also superior to ACEI and CCB in prevention of heart failure.¹¹³ Thiazide diuretics do worsen cholesterol, glucose, uric acid and cause hypokalemia. Worsening glycemia, insulin resistance and hypertriglyceridemia are more likely to occur in obese compared with lean patients when hydrochlorothiazide is given.¹²⁴ Nonetheless, chlorthalidone has been shown to have such clear outcome advantages over alternative classes in patients with metabolic syndrome that it probably should be preferred for first-line therapy, especially in blacks. Clearly, it is very important to regularly monitor potassium, lipids, urate and glucose if thiazides are used.

In summary, antihypertensive treatment in obesity should be guided by evidence from large-scale outcome trials, though informed by adverse effect profiles. Unfortunately, such an approach fails to support the use of adrenergic blockade (whether α, β or centrally acting). Outcome trials support the use of chlorthalidone as the first-line therapy in obesity–hypertension without type 2 diabetes. Second-line therapies would include CCB or ACEI/ARB. Black patients with obesity–hypertension should receive chlorthalidone and then a CCB before a RAAS blocker (and an ARB over an ACEI), based on outcomes and adverse events. Patients with obesity–hypertension and diabetes should receive an ACEI or ARB early, probably with chlorthalidone. β-Blockers do appear to confer some benefits but less than the classes above, so they should be considered as the fourth-line therapy. Obese patients with resistant hypertension may benefit from an aldosterone receptor antagonist. Centrally acting agents and α-adrenoceptors should be considered as the last-line therapy. However, it is important to realize that none of these antihypertensive drugs addresses the central causation of obesity–hypertension, namely, increased adipose tissue mass.

Antihypertensive effects of weight loss interventions

Given that obesity increases BP by multiple mechanisms, including hyperleptinemia, hyperinsulinemia and changes in renal afferent nerve signaling, weight loss can be thought of as a pathophysiologically targeted intervention for obesity–hypertension. Weight loss reduces circulating leptin and insulin concentrations, and improves leptin and insulin resistance. These improvements should lead to a decrease in SNA and BP. We review changes in BP with different weight loss interventions below. In order to aid assessment of potential weight-independent BP effects, we have calculated changes in BP for different interventions corrected to a standardized 5% weight loss (Table 1).

Table 1.

Selected controlled clinical trials of weight loss interventions and their effect on BP

	Subjects (active/control)	Duration (months)	Daily dose (mg)	Weight, Δ (%)	Placebo-adjusted weight Δ (%)	SBP Δ (mmHg)	Placebo-adjusted SBP Δ (mmHg)	SBP Δ per 5% weight loss (mm Hg)
Lifestyle
Neter et al.130	4874	6	NA		−5.8		−4.4	−3.8
DPP: intensive150	1079/1082	38	NA	−5.9	−5.8	−3.3	−2.7	−2.3
LOOK AHEAD136	2570/2575	48	NA	−4.7	−3.6	−4.6	−1.3	−1.8
Restrictive surgery
Sjöström et al.137	156/627	120	NA	−13.2	−14.8	+2.1	−2.3	−0.8
O’Brien et al.151	40/40	24	NA	−21.6	−16.1	− 14.2	−4.8	−1.5
Malabsorptive surgery
Hofso et al.152	76/63	12	NA	−30	−22.0	−14.0	−4.0	−0.9
Sjöström et al.137	34/627	120	NA	−25	−26.6	−4.7	−6.8	−1.3
Sibutramine
SCOUT138	4906/4898	41	10	−1.8	−1.8		+1.4	+2.0
Erondu et al.153	100/101a	6	10	−6.0	−4.2	+2.1	+2.0	+2.4
Phentermine
OB301154	326a	6	15	−5.8	−4.3	−3.3	−1.7	−2.0
Kang et al.155	74	3	30	−9.3	−7.4	−1.0	+2.0	+1.3
Diethylpropion
Cercato et al.156	37/32	6	12	−9.8	−6.6	−4.4	+2.7	+2.1
Bupropion
Anderson et al.157	105/112	6	400	− 10.1	−5.1	− 1.7	+0.9	+0.9
Orlistat
Sjöström et al.158	343/340	12	360	−10.2	−4.1	−2.0	−3.0	−3.7
XENDOS159	1640/1637	48	360	−5.3	−2.6	−4.9	−1.5	−2.9
Miles et al.160	250/254	12	360	−4.6	−2.9	−2.1	−1.7	−2.9
Erondu et al.153	99/101a	6	360	−4.8	−3.4	−1.4	−1.5	−2.2
GLP-1 agonists
Liraglutide: Astrup et al.142	95/98	5	3	−7.4	−4.5	−6.9	−3.1	−3.4
LEAD-6, liraglutide161	233	6	1.8	−3.5		−2.5		−3.6
LEAD-6, exenatide161	231	6	0.02	−3.1		−2.0		−3.2
Topiramate
Bray et al.162	50/48	6	192	−8.2	−4.6	−8.4	−6.7	−7.3*
Wilding et al.133	215/215	12	192	−9.1	−7.4	−5.7	−6.1	−4.1
Tonstad et al.163	53/56	6	192	−6.5	−4.6	−9.7	−4.8	−5.2*
Stenlof et al.164	77/78	9	192	−9.1	−6.6	−7.6	−5.6	−4.2
Toplak et al.143	105/100	6	192	−6.5	−4.8	−4.4	−4.0	−4.2
Zonisamide
Gadde et al.165	20/17	8	427	−9.4	−7.6	−6.8	−5.4	−3.6
Pramlintide
Aronne et al.147	36/25	6	360	−3.7	− 1.5	−4.5	−1.0	−3.3
Lorcaserin
Smith RS et al.131	1538/1499	12	20	−5.8	−3.7	− 1.4	−0.6	−0.8
Metformin
DPP: metformin150	1073/1082	38	1700	−2.2	−2.1	−0.3	+0.3	+0.7
Top+ Phen
Gadde et al.134	981/979	12	92/15	−9.9	−8.5	−5.6	−3.2	−1.9
Bup+Nal
Greenway et al.135	581/583	12	360/32	−6.1	−4.8	−0.1	+1.8	+1.9

Abbreviations: BP, blood pressure; Bup, bupropion; CI, confidence interval; DPP, diabetes prevention program; GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide-1; LEAD-6, liraglutide effect and action in diabetes; NA, not available; Nal, naltrexone; Phen, phentermine; SBP, systolic BP; XENDOS; Xenical in the Prevention of Diabetes in Obese Subjects.

The last column shows BP changes with weight loss adjusted for the degree of weight loss (to facilitate comparison of weight loss-independent effects on BP. The standard comparator for this parameter is derived from the first study listed (Netter et al.), a meta-analysis of lifestyle interventions lasting at least for 6 months). From this study, the calculated 95% confidence limits for change in SBP per 5% weight loss from lifestyle intervention are −2.5 to −5.1 mm Hg. BP reductions that are less than the lower 95% CI (that is, significantly less than that expected from degree of weight loss) are marked in italics. BP reductions that are more than the upper 95% CI (that is, significantly more than expected from the degree of weight loss) are marked in bold and with an.

^*Note that even longer-term lifestyle studies have an effect on BP that is less than would be predicted from short-term studies, even after controlling for less weight loss.

^aThese trials had multiple active drugs. Subject numbers include only those randomized to placebo and the relevant drug.

Lifestyle interventions for weight loss include diet, behavior and exercise modification. Experimental weight gain increases SNA by ~20% in lean subjects.¹²⁵ Multiple studies have shown that dietinduced weight loss reduces SNA by 14–34%^126–129 and norepinephrine spillover by about 25%,¹²⁹ with no additive effect of exercise. In a large meta-analysis, short-term (6 month) interventions reduced weight by ~6% and systolic BP by 4.4mmHg, with a change in SBP of −3.8 mm Hg per 5% weight loss (Table 1; 95% confidence interval −2.5 to −5.1).¹³⁰ The main disadvantage of lifestyle interventions is lack of sustainability, unless extremely intensive interventions are performed. The longer-term ‘failure’ rate for lifestyle interventions (defined as <5% weight loss at 12 months) ranges from 68 to 84% in carefully controlled trials.^131–135 The BP benefit of long-term lifestyle interventions is disappointing not only because of diminished weight loss, but also because the BP benefit diminishes when corrected for the degree of weight loss (that is, −3.8 versus −1.8 mm Hg per 5% weight loss for 6 versus 48-month studies; Table 1). Weight loss through lifestyle change also improves glycemia and lipids (usually by under 10%), though this diminishes with time too. For example, after 4 years, the Look AHEAD (Action for Health in Diabetes) Trial showed very modest improvements in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (+3%) and glycemia (−2%), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides and diastolic BP actually increased, compared with standard support.¹³⁶

Bariatric surgery includes restrictive (gastric stapling and laparoscopic gastric banding) and malabsorptive procedures (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass). Restrictive surgery has been shown to reduce weight by 15% and BP by ~3.5mmHg (~1mmHg per 5% weight loss; Table 1). Malabsorptive surgery has been shown to reduce weight by 25% and BP by ~5mmHg (also ~1mmHg per 5% weight loss). Surgery substantially improves glycemia and also lipids (usually by 10–20%) depending on weight loss. Disadvantages include the risk of death and morbidity (infection and gastrointestinal) from surgery and modest weight regain (20% of weight lost regained after 10 years).¹³⁷ In general, bariatric surgery almost always reduces BP beyond what is achieved with lifestyle change. However, the relative antihypertensive effect is significantly less than expected from the degree of weight loss (Table 1).

Pharmacotherapy for weight loss has diverse effects on BP, which are additive to those of lifestyle intervention. Stimulants such as phentermine, sibutramine, diethylpropion and bupropion reduce weight through appetite suppression. They all share an action to increase central nervous system synaptic catecholamine concentrations. Such agents reduce weight by 2–7%, but tend to increase BP compared with lifestyle intervention (+1 to +2 mmHg per 5% weight loss; Table 1). Heart rate also increases, suggesting sympathetic activation and propensity to cardiac arrhythmias. Importantly, in the Sibutramine Cardiovascular Outcome Trial, obese subjects on sibutramine had a 15% increase in cardiovascular events.¹³⁸ This occurred despite modest (< 5%) improvements in lipids and glycemia, suggesting that small BP increases can offset benefits on other risk factors. Such stimulant agents should not be used to treat obesity, especially when combined with hypertension.

Orlistat is a reversible intestinal lipase inhibitor and blocks about 30% of dietary fat absorption. We have shown that orlistat decreases sympathetic nerve traffic by 20% in obese normotensive¹³⁹ and by 26% in obese hypertensive subjects.¹⁴⁰ Most patients have sustained weight loss with orlistat, with a ‘failure’ rate (defined as < 5% weight loss at 12 months) of 51% compared with 77% for placebo.¹³² Overall, orlistat reduces weight by ~3% and BP by ~2 mm Hg, additional to what is achieved with lifestyle intervention. Adjusted BP change of −3 mm Hg per 5% weight loss is proportional (though additive) with what would be expected from lifestyle intervention (Table 1). Orlistat has particular benefits on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and glycemia (10 and 7% reductions) and reduces risk of developing diabetes. However, it can worsen high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and cause gastrointestinal symptoms if there is high-fat intake.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, such as liraglutide and exenatide, appear to reduce weight through effects on gastric emptying and possibly also increase fat oxidation.¹⁴¹ They decrease weight by ~ 4% and BP by ~ 3 mm Hg beyond what is achieved with lifestyle intervention alone (Table 1). Weight loss-adjusted BP change (−3.5 mm Hg per 5% weight loss) is additive and proportional to that of intensive short-term lifestyle intervention. Glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists reduce glycemia by about 10%, but do not alter lipids.¹⁴²

Topiramate and zonisamide are both antiseizure drugs that reduce weight; they share carbonic anhydrase inhibition. They are the most efficacious drugs for obesity, decreasing weight by 5–8% and BP by ~7mmHg beyond lifestyle intervention alone (Table 1). Most patients exhibit sustained and significant weight loss on topiramate, with a ‘failure’ rate (defined as < 5% weight loss at 12 months) of 33% compared with 82% for placebo.¹³³ Adjusted BP change for topiramate and zonisamide (−4 to −7mmHg per 5% weight loss) is additive to that from lifestyle intervention and disproportionately greater than expected from the degree of weight loss. Topiramate reduces glycemia by about 10%, but does not alter lipids.¹⁴³

Lorcaserin is a centrally acting selective serotonin 2C receptor agonist, which reduces appetite. Most patients exhibit sustained and significant weight loss on lorcaserin, with a ‘failure’ rate (defined as <5% weight loss at 12 months) of 52% compared with 80% for placebo.¹³¹ Lorcaserin decreases weight by ~4% and BP by ~ 1 mm Hg beyond what is achieved with lifestyle intervention alone (Table 1). Weight loss-adjusted BP change (−1 mm Hg per 5% weight loss) is additive to lifestyle intervention, but significantly less than expected from the degree of weight loss. Lorcaserin produces extremely modest improvements in cholesterol and glycemia (1–2%).¹³¹

Pramlintide is a synthetic form of a pancreatic islet-derived polypeptide amylin that is co-secreted with insulin. Amylin reverses leptin resistance, reduces food intake, slows gastric emptying, attenuates postprandial glucagon secretion and reduces body weight in obese rodents.^144,145 Pramlintide decreases weight by ~2% and BP by ~ 1 mm Hg beyond what is achieved with lifestyle intervention alone (Table 1). Weight loss-adjusted BP change (−3 mm Hg per 5% weight loss) is additive to lifestyle intervention, and commensurate with the degree of weight loss. Pramlintide reduces glycemia by ~5% and cholesterol by ~2%.^146,147 The main disadvantages are the need for twice daily injections and nausea.

Metformin, a biguanide antihyperglycemic agent, works by increasing AMP-dependent protein kinase activity, stimulating fatty acid oxidation, decreasing hepatic glucose production and improving insulin sensitivity. It also has gastrointestinal side effects, including nausea and diarrhea that may contribute to weight loss. Metformin decreases weight by ~2%, but without appreciable BP reductions (Table 1). In fact, BP tends to be higher than expected from the degree of weight loss (+1 mm Hg per 5% weight loss). However, metformin produces substantial improvement in glycemia (−15%), and reduces triglycerides (−6%) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (−6%).¹⁴⁸ In addition, metformin has been shown to reduce myocardial infarction and overall mortality in obese diabetic patients by ~ 30%.¹⁴⁹

Several combination products have been tested for weight loss. Unfortunately, these have usually used at least one component that has a BP-elevating effect. For example, studies of topiramate and phentermine show a BP effect that is less than expected from the degree of weight loss (−2mmHg per 5% weight loss; Table 1), and certainly less than obtained with topiramate alone (~ 5 mm Hg per 5% weight loss). The combination of bupropion and naltrexone makes the already bad effect of bupropion on BP worse (Table 1).

CONCLUSION

In summary, obesity increases BP through multiple mechanisms, including sympathoactivation, increased activity of the RAAS and renal sodium retention. Hyperleptinemia combined with selective leptin resistance appears to have a critical role. Targeting specific mechanisms of leptin resistance is not yet possible. This has clinical implications for the treatment of obesity–hypertension. No specific antihypertensive class appears to have better BP-lowering efficacy in obesity–hypertension. However, α- and β-adrenoceptor blockers appear to be less likely to reduce cardiovascular events and cause problematic adverse events in metabolic syndrome. On the other hand, chlorthalidone and RAAS blockers appear to prevent more cardiovascular events in patients with metabolic syndrome, though potassium levels need to be monitored carefully.

Even before resorting to antihypertensive pharmacotherapy, weight loss interventions are warranted. Weight reduction addresses the underlying causes of obesity–hypertension, and often improves other comorbidities. Importantly, weight loss appears to reduce sympathetic activation in obesity. Lifestyle intervention should remain a cornerstone of treatment. However, lifestyle change is arduous for the patient and provider, and its effects are small and diminish greatly with time. Around 80% of patients fail to achieve meaningful weight loss at 1 year using lifestyle modification. Though surgery causes substantial weight loss, it can be fatal or disabling, and it has modest effects on hypertension. Thus, surgery may be best reserved for patients with diabetes or other complications of obesity. Carefully chosen weight loss pharmacotherapy offers great potential, with much lower failure rates than lifestyle. Some drugs have been shown to provide substantial weight loss and BP benefits, whereas others have undesirable BP consequences. Phentermine, sibutramine, diethylpropion, bupropion and the combination of bupropion and naltrexone have all been shown to increase BP regardless of weight loss. On the other hand, orlistat, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (topiramate and zonisamide) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists produce substantial BP reductions that are additive to lifestyle. In many cases, these are greater in degree than even the most intensive short-term lifestyle programs can achieve (especially for topiramate). In the long term, elucidation of the mechanisms of obesity–hypertension and the molecular signaling of leptin, insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 should provide new approaches to obesity–hypertension.