Skip to main content
The Journal of Infectious Diseases logoLink to The Journal of Infectious Diseases
. 2013 Aug 29;209(4):510–522. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit472

Genital Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 Infection in Humanized HIV-Transgenic Mice Triggers HIV Shedding and Is Associated With Greater Neurological Disease

Briana Nixon 1, Esra Fakioglu 2, Martha Stefanidou 1, Yanhua Wang 3, Monica Dutta 1, Harris Goldstein 1,2, Betsy C Herold 1,2
PMCID: PMC3903370  PMID: 23990571

Abstract

Background. Epidemiological studies consistently demonstrate synergy between herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) and human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). Higher HIV-1 loads are observed in coinfected individuals, and conversely, HIV-1 is associated with more-severe herpetic disease. A small animal model of coinfection would facilitate identification of the biological mechanisms underlying this synergy and provide the opportunity to evaluate interventions.

Methods. Mice transgenic for HIV-1 provirus and human cyclin T1 under the control of a CD4 promoter (JR-CSF/hu-cycT1) were intravaginally infected with HSV-2 and evaluated for disease progression, HIV shedding, and mucosal immune responses.

Results. HSV-2 infection resulted in higher vaginal HIV loads and genital tissue expression of HIV RNA, compared with HSV-uninfected JR-CSF/hu-cycT1 mice. There was an increase in genital tract inflammatory cells, cytokines, chemokines, and interferons in response to HSV-2, although the kinetics of the response were delayed in HIV-transgenic, compared with control mice. Moreover, the JR-CSF/hu-cycT1 mice exhibited earlier and more-severe neurological disease. The latter was associated with downregulation of secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor expression in neuronal tissue, a molecule with antiinflammatory, antiviral, and neuroprotective properties.

Conclusions. JR-CSF/hu-cycT1 mice provide a valuable model to study HIV/HSV-2 coinfection and identify potential mechanisms by which HSV-2 facilitates HIV-1 transmission and HIV modulates HSV-2–mediated disease.

Keywords: herpes simplex virus-2, human immunodeficiency virus-1, coinfection, sexually transmitted infections, mouse model, female genital tract


Genital herpes is one of the most prevalent sexually transmitted infections worldwide, and its synergistic relationship with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) amplifies its public health implications. Herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) seroprevalence rates approach 90%–95% among HIV-infected individuals in developing countries, where HSV-2 remains the dominant cause of genital ulcerative disease [1]. Clinical or subclinical (presence of viral DNA in the absence of clinical signs) HSV-2 reactivation increases the risk of acquiring and transmitting HIV [2, 3]. Epidemiological studies consistently demonstrate higher plasma viral loads and increased genital tract HIV during episodes of HSV-2 reactivation, which may increase the risk for sexual and mother-to-child transmission and accelerate HIV disease progression [36].

Conversely, HIV-infected individuals are at greater risk for more frequent and severe HSV-2 recurrences, compared with HIV-uninfected persons, and the risk is only partly reduced by highly active antiretroviral therapy [7, 8]. These clinical observations have led to recommendations to consider valacyclovir/acyclovir prophylaxis in HIV-positive pregnant women who may be at increased risk of transmitting HSV to their newborns [9]. Although it is presumed that the increase in HSV infection recurrences in HIV-infected individuals reflects impaired T-cell responses, alterations in the genital tract mucosal immune environment may also contribute. Together, these epidemiological observations highlight the need to define the molecular mechanisms underlying the biological synergy between HSV and HIV.

The absence of animal models of coinfection has constrained investigation of the interactions between these viruses and has limited our ability to identify strategies to disrupt the synergy. Nonhuman primates provide insights into HIV pathogenesis but rely primarily on simian immunodeficiency virus or SHIV and are limited by their variable susceptibility to HSV infection and the high costs of experiments [10]. Mouse models provide several potential advantages, including increased feasibility of conducting studies with larger numbers of animals because of lower costs and availability of reagents to characterize immune responses [11]. Wild-type mice, however, have 2 major species-specific restrictions [13]. Entry is blocked because the HIV envelope glycoprotein, gp120, does not engage mouse CD4 and CCR5 [4], and HIV Tat does not bind to mouse cyclin T1 and consequently cannot activate HIV-1 transcription [5]. Several humanized mouse models have been developed to circumvent these problems with variable success. One study, which focused on susceptibility to HIV infection, found that mice transgenic for human CD4, CCR5, and cyclin T1 were more susceptible to HIV infection if they were first intravaginally infected with HSV-2, although the mechanisms for the increased susceptibility were not fully delineated, and the synergy could not be further studied because the mice do not support efficient HIV replication [12, 13]. We adopted a different strategy by developing the JR-CSF/hu-cycT1 mouse, which is transgenic for an integrated full-length infectious HIV-1 provirus derived from the primary R5-tropic clinical isolate JR-CSF regulated by the endogenous HIV-1 long terminal repeat (LTR) and for the human cyclin T1 gene under the control of a mouse CD4 promoter [14]. Selective expression of human cyclin T1 by mouse CD4-expressing immune cells specifically amplifies HIV production by the cells that are the usual target for HIV infection. The current studies were undertaken to explore whether JR-CSF/hu-cycT1 mice could provide a model of HIV/HSV coinfection and to test the hypotheses that HSV-2 infection increases HIV shedding and, conversely, that HIV modulates HSV-2 disease.

METHODS

Murine Model

JR-CSF/hu-cycT1 (HIV-TG) and control nontransgenic littermates (6–8 weeks old) were generated and maintained as described elsewhere [14]. Mice were pretreated subcutaneously with 2.5 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate (Sicor Pharmaceuticals, Irvine, CA) 5 days before intravaginal inoculation with 104, 105, or 106 plaque-forming units (PFU)/mouse of clinical isolate HSV-2(4674) delivered in 30 µL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or PBS alone (mock infection) [15]. Mice were evaluated daily and scored for epithelial disease (erythema, edema, genital ulcers, and hair loss around the perineum) and neurological disease (urinary and fecal retention and hind-limb paresis/paralysis) on a scale that ranged from 0 (no disease) to 4 (severe ulceration, hair loss, or hind-limb paralysis) [15, 16]. Mice that reached a clinical score of 4 were euthanized. Vaginal washes were collected in 150 µL of normal saline; mice were euthanized at specified times, and genital tract tissue, lumbar and sacral lymph nodes, and dorsal root ganglia and lower spinal cord (neuronal tissue) were harvested for analyses described below.

Cytokine and Chemokine Measurements

Vaginal washes were clarified by centrifugation (210 ×g) for 10 minutes at 4°C in the presence of protease inhibitors (Complete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail; Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN), and the supernatants were stored at −80°C. The washes were pooled (2–5 mice per pool), and from each group 6–14 pools were evaluated for interferon γ (IFN-γ), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interleukin 1β (IL-1β), interleukin 6 (IL-6), macrophage inflammatory protein 1β (MIP-1β), RANTES, monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1), CXCL-1, and MIP-2, using a multiplex proteome array with beads from Millipore (Billerica, MA), measured with a Luminex 100 system (Luminex, Austin, TX), and analyzed using StarStation (Applied Cytometry Systems, Sacramento, CA).

Measurement of HIV and HSV-2

HIV RNA was quantified in vaginal washes after pooling 50 µL from 3 mice per group and diluting the pool 1:10 in PBS (m2000 system; Abbott Molecular). Data are presented as log10 HIV copies per 150 µL of vaginal wash. To quantify HIV in tissue, RNA was extracted, reverse transcribed to complementary DNA (cDNA), and measured by real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), using HIV-1 LTR–specific primers (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA) run in duplicate (ABI Prism 7000 detection system; Applied Biosystems). Serial dilutions of U1 cell lysate DNA were included as a positive control. U1 cell DNA has 2 copies of HIV [17]; the number of U1 cells per dilution and the resulting LTR threshold cycle value for that dilution were used to calculate the HIV copy number for each tissue sample.

To quantify HSV-2, genital tract and neuronal tissues were weighed, homogenized in serum-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, using RNase-free pestles, sonicated for 30 seconds, and centrifuged at 10 000 ×g for 5 minutes. Supernatants were assayed for HSV-2 in a standard Vero cell plaque assay. Data are presented as log10 PFU per gram of tissue. HSV-2 loads in neuronal tissue were also measured by real-time qPCR, using primers for the immediate early gene, ICP4, and β-actin (Applied Biosystems) on DNA that was extracted from the tissue using a DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA).

Immune Mediator Gene Expression

Genital tract and neuronal tissue were homogenized, and total RNA was extracted using the Absolutely RNA Miniprep Kit (Agilent Stratagene, Santa Clara, CA). Reverse transcription was performed using 400 ng of RNA and the StrataScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Applied Biosystems), and real-time qPCR was performed with 50 ng of cDNA [18]. Primers for β-actin, interleukin 1α (IL-1α), IL-1β, IL-6, interleukin 12α, interleukin 17α (IL-17α), CXCL-1, MCP-1, MIP-1β, MIP-2, RANTES, TNF-α, IFN-α4, IFN-β, IFN-γ, IRF-7, Ifit1, Mx1, Oas2, PKR, and secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI) were obtained from Applied Biosystems.

Hematoxylin-Eosin Staining

Genital tract tissue was harvested on days 2 and 8 after infection, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight, transferred into 70% ethanol, and stored at 4°C. Tissues were embedded in paraffin and transversely sectioned using a microtome, and serial sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin. Stained sections (2–3 per group at each time point) were evaluated in a blinded fashion for inflammatory cell counts in a 625 µm2 area (original magnification, 40×).

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Lymph Nodes

Lymph nodes were excised on necropsy and stored on ice in PBS. Intact tissue was disassociated through a 70-µm filter, and intact cells were isolated by filtration through a 40-µm filter. A total of 5 × 105 cells per sample were stained with combinations of anti-CD3-APC or anti-CD3-FITC, anti-CD4-PB, anti-CD8-PerCP, and/or anti-CD19-FITC (e-Bioscience, San Diego, CA) and analyzed on a Becton Dickinson FACSCanto II analyzer, using FlowJo v9.3.1 software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR). Ten thousand live events were acquired following gating, using an IR-conjugated Live/Dead Marker (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA).

Statistical Analysis

Immune responses to HSV-2 were compared between HIV-TG and control mice by unpaired t tests, and survival and disease scores were compared by the log-rank test (GraphPad Prism, version 6; GraphPad Software).

RESULTS

HIV-Positive Transgenic Mice Are More Susceptible to HSV-2 Infection and Demonstrate More-Severe Neurological Disease Than Controls

HIV-TG and control mice were challenged intravaginally with approximately 104, 105, and 106 PFU/mouse of HSV-2(4674) (Figure 1AC). Significantly greater mortality was observed in HIV-TG mice, compared with control mice, following infection with the lower dose of HSV-2 (104 PFU), with both groups showing >90% mortality following exposure to 106 PFU. To ensure that differential rates of HSV-2 infection did not impact outcomes in subsequent studies, the higher dose of HSV-2 was used to further study coinfection. Mice (23–25 per group) were intravaginally inoculated with HSV-2 (106 PFU/mouse), and a log-rank test was used to compare clinical response over time by dichotomizing mice into those with a score of ≥3 and those with a score of <3. There was a statistically nonsignificant trend toward greater epithelial disease (P = .07; Figure 1D) and a significant increase in neurological disease in HIV-TG over time, compared with control mice (P < .05; Figure 1E).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–transgenic (HIV-TG) mice are more susceptible to vaginal herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) infection and exhibit greater neurologic disease. HIV-TG and littermate control (CTRL) female mice were inoculated intravaginally with 104 plaque-forming units (PFU; A), 105 PFU (B), and 106 PFU (C) of HSV-2(4674) (n = 5 mice per group). Mice were monitored daily and were euthanized if they had disease scores of 4. Survival curves are shown. To further explore clinical response to HSV-2, HIV-TG or CTRL mice (27–29 mice per group) were infected with 106 PFU of HSV-2 and monitored daily for signs of disease and scored on a scale of 0–4 for epithelial (D) or neurological (E) disease. Mean scores + standard errors of the mean per day are shown. *P < .05, by the log-rank test.

Coinfection Is Associated With Increased HIV Replication

Consistent with clinical experiences in coinfected individuals, the quantity of HIV RNA detected in vaginal washes was significantly greater in HSV-2–infected HIV-TG mice, compared with mock-infected HIV-TG mice, on days 1, 2, and 3 after infection and compared with baseline levels (Figure 2A). There was also a statistically significant increase in HIV LTR expression in genital tract tissue in HSV-2–infected HIV-TG mice, compared with mock-infected HIV-TG mice, on days 1 and 8 after infection (Figure 2B). To investigate whether the differences in neurological disease observed in the coinfected mice reflected differences in local viral replication, HIV and HSV-2 expression were examined in neuronal tissue harvested on day 8. There was a statistically nonsignificant trend toward increased HIV LTR RNA levels in neuronal tissue (Figure 2C) but no difference in HSV-2 ICP4 expression (Figure 2F). There were also no differences in the quantity of infectious HSV-2 recovered from neuronal or genital tract tissue in HIV-TG mice, compared with control mice (Figure 2D and 2E), suggesting that differences in neurological disease are not attributable to greater HSV-2 replication but may reflect immune responses.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Herpes simplex virus (HSV) triggers an increase in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) shedding and production in the genital tract of HIV-transgenic (HIV-TG) mice. The numbers of HIV RNA copies were measured in pooled vaginal washes (3 mice per pool) at baseline (before HSV exposure) and 1, 2, and 3 days after infection in HIV-TG mice (A). Data are mean values + standard errors of the mean (SEM) from 3 separate pools. RNA was extracted from tissue harvested 1, 2, and 8 days after infection from 3–15 mice per group. RNA was reverse transcribed to complementary DNA, and the gene expression of HIV LTR was determined by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) in genital tract (B) and neuronal (C) tissue, using a standard curve of U1 cell lysate DNA to determine the relationship between threshold cycle values and the number of HIV copies. Data are graphed as mean + SEM. *P < .05, by the unpaired t test, vs mock-infected HIV-TG mice. Tissue was also harvested on days 1, 2, 3, and 8 after infection, weighed, homogenized, and plated on Vero cells. Forty-eight hours later, plaques were counted, and the number of plaque-forming units (PFU) per gram of tissue were determined for genital tract (D) and neuronal (E) tissue (3 mice per group). As a second means of quantifying HSV loads in neuronal tissue, DNA was extracted from neuronal tissue on day 8 after infection and was assayed for HSV genomes (using primers for ICP4) by real-time qPCR (F). Data are expressed relative to findings for an uninfected mouse, with 5 mice per group. All data are graphed as mean values + SEM.

HSV-2 Induces Mucosal Inflammation, but Responses Are Delayed in HIV-TG Mice

There was a significant increase in concentrations of IFN-γ, IL-6, CXCL-1, MCP-1, MIP-1β, and RANTES secreted into the vaginal washes on days 1 and 3 following HSV-2 infection in both HIV-TG and control mice, compared with their respective mock-infected controls (Figure 3A and 3B). This response likely contributed to the increased local HIV replication observed in response to HSV-2. There were no statistically significant differences in the concentrations of cytokines or chemokines in vaginal washes from mock-infected HIV-TG mice, compared with control mice.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Increased cytokine and chemokine levels in vaginal washes in human immunodeficiency virus–transgenic and control mice. Protein levels were measured using a 9-plex Luminex assay in vaginal washes obtained on day 1 (A) and day 3 (B) after infection. Washes were grouped into pools of 2–5 mice; 6–14 pools were run per treatment group. Data are graphed as mean values + standard error of the mean. *P < .05, by the unpaired t test, between infected and uninfected respective control mice. Abbreviations: IFN-γ, interferon γ; IL-1β, interleukin 1β; IL-6, interleukin 6; MCP, monocyte chemotactic protein; MIP, macrophage inflammatory protein; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor α.

To evaluate whether the increased levels of mediators in vaginal washes were associated with increased gene expression (and not only release of intracellular stores), RNA levels were measured in excised tissue. The only significant difference in mock-infected mice was decreased expression of RANTES in HIV-TG mice, compared with control mice, on day 2 (Figure 4A and 4B). Compared with respective mock-infected mice, significant increases in IL-1α, IL-1β, MCP-1, MIP-1β, RANTES, and TNF-α RNA levels were detected on day 2 after infection in control mice but not HIV-TG mice (Figure 4A). However, significantly increased gene expression of these mediators was observed in both groups of HSV-infected mice on day 8 after infection; IL-17α gene expression was only increased in HIV-TG mice (Figure 4B). Significantly increased expression of inflammatory mediators was also observed in both groups on day 8 after infection in neuronal tissue (Figure 4C), a time coinciding with a trend toward increased levels of HIV RNA in coinfected mice (Figure 2C). IL-17α was not detected in neuronal tissue.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Delayed upregulation of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–transgenic mice, compared with control mice, in response to herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) infection. RNA was extracted from genital tract and neuronal tissue, converted to complementary DNA, and analyzed by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction for the indicated cytokine and chemokine genes on day 2 after infection (A; 4–7 mice/group) and day 8 after infection (B; 7–16 mice/group) and in neuronal tissue on day 8 after infection (C; 2–5 mice/group). Data are graphed as mean values + standard error of the mean. *P < .05, by the unpaired t test, between HSV-infected mice and their respective untreated controls. P < .05, by the unpaired t test, between the 2 HSV-infected groups or between the 2 mock-infected groups. Abbreviations: IL-1α, interleukin 1α; IL-1β, interleukin 1β; IL-6, interleukin 6; IL-17α, interleukin 17α; MCP, monocyte chemotactic protein; MIP, macrophage inflammatory protein; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor α.

HSV-2 Infection Induces IFN Responses

Type 1 IFN responses play important roles in host defense but may also contribute to pathology. While HSV-2 induced an increase in the expression of several IFN-related genes, including those encoding Ifit1, Mx1, IRF-7, Oas2, and PKR, in genital tract tissue on day 2 after infection, only the control mice exhibited significant increases in IFN-β and IFN-γ expression (Figure 5A). However, as with the cytokine/chemokine responses, both groups of HSV-2–infected mice displayed a significant increase in IFN-γ expression on day 8 after infection (Figure 5B). Notably, expression of IRF-7, Oas2, and PKR genes was modestly downregulated in mock-infected HIV-TG mice, compared with control mice, although these differences were only seen in tissue isolated on day 2. We also observed a significant increase in expression of IFN genes in response to HSV-2 in neuronal tissue on day 8 (Figure 5C), with little or no difference between HIV-TG and control mice in their responses.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) induces earlier and more potent interferon responses in control mice, compared with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–transgenic (HIV-TG) mice, and downregulates secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI) expression in neuronal tissue from HIV-TG mice. Excised tissues were analyzed by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction for the indicated interferon (IFN) genes in genital tract tissue on day 2 after infection (A; 4–7 mice/group) and day 8 after infection (B; 7–16 mice/group) and in neuronal tissue on day 8 after infection (C; 2–5 mice/group) and for SLPI in neuronal tissue (D). Data are graphed as mean values + standard error of the mean. *P < .05, by the unpaired t test, between HSV-2–infected mice and the respective mock-infected control group. †P < .05, by the unpaired t test, between the 2 HSV-2–infected groups or between the 2 mock-infected groups.

SLPI Is Downregulated in Neuronal Tissue Harvested From Coinfected Mice

SLPI is an antiinflammatory protein expressed by multiple cell types with in vitro activity against HSV-2 [19] and HIV-1 [20], as well as neuroprotective roles [2123]. We previously found that HSV-2 downregulates SLPI expression in epithelial cells in vitro [24]. To explore whether these in vitro results translated to the in vivo murine model and whether this might contribute to the increased neurological disease in the coinfected mice, SLPI expression was evaluated by real-time qPCR in neuronal and genital tract tissue. SLPI expression was significantly downregulated in neuronal tissue in the coinfected mice on day 8 (Figure 5D) but was not detected in genital tract tissue in any of the groups (data not shown).

Recruitment of Inflammatory Cells Into the Genital Tract in Response to HSV-2 Is Delayed in HIV-TG Mice

Histological examination of genital tract tissue extracted on day 2 after infection in control mice demonstrated acute inflammation with a significant increase in inflammatory cells, compared with uninfected tissue (P < .05), and with neutrophil infiltration into the lamina propria, epithelium, and lumen of the mucosa (Figure 6AC and 6K). The number of inflammatory cells declined significantly between days 2 and 8 (P < .001), and chronic inflammatory changes were observed on day 8 with lymphocytes, plasma cells, and rare neutrophils (Figure 6G and 6H). In contrast, while there was no increase in inflammatory cells in response to HSV-2 on day 2 after infection in HIV-TG mice, the number of inflammatory cells increased over time and was greater on day 8, compared with baseline values and with values for HSV-2–infected control mice; the differences did not reach statistical significance (P = .10; Figure 6DF and 6IK). These findings are consistent with the delayed cytokine/chemokine response to HSV-2 in the HIV-TG mice.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Delayed inflammatory response to herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–transgenic mice, compared with control mice. Sections of genital tract tissue in paraffin were stained with hematoxylin-eosin to characterize cells present in genital tract mucosa and submucosa. Representative images from control mice at baseline (A), day 2 after infection (original magnification, 10× [B] and 60× [C]), and day 8 after infection (original magnification, 10× [G] and 60× [H]) and from HIV-transgenic mice at baseline (D), 2 days after infection (original magnification, 10× [E] and 60× [F]), and 8 days after infection (original magnification, 10× [I] and 60× [J]) are shown. Arrows show representative neutrophils. Images are representative of results obtained from 2–3 mice in each group. K, Inflammatory cell counts in mock-infected (baseline) and HSV-2–infected control (CTRL) or HIV-TG mice 2 and 8 days after infection were made in a blinded manner on 625-µm2 areas of tissue under 40× magnification from 2–3 sections per group. Mean values + standard error of the mean of counts are shown. *P < .05, by the unpaired t test.

To explore the effect of HSV-2 infection on immune cell populations in the draining lymph nodes, nodes were harvested from mice 2 and 8 days after infection and stained for the expression of CD3 (T cells) or CD19 (B cells) and then, within the CD3+ population, for expression of CD4 and CD8. There was a decrease in the percentage of CD3+ cells and a concomitant increase in CD19+ cells in both HIV-TG and control mouse lymph nodes in response to HSV-2 infection, suggesting trafficking of T cells from the lymph node to the genital tract (Figure 7A and 7B). However, there were notable differences in the CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses to HSV-2 between HIV-TG and control mice (Figure 7CE). Compared with mock-infected mice, HSV-2 infection of control mice was associated with a significant increase in CD8+ T-cell counts on days 2 and 8 after infection and a decrease in CD4+ T-cell counts on day 8, resulting in a decrease in the ratio of CD4+ T cells to CD8+ T cells, which reached statistical significance on day 8 (P < .05). In contrast, there was a significant decrease in CD8+ T-cell counts on day 8 after infection and no change in CD4+ T-cell counts or the ratio of CD4+ T cells to CD8+ T cells in HSV-infected HIV-TG mice, compared with mock-infected HIV-TG mice. The mock-infected HIV-TG mice exhibited a statistically nonsignificant lower ratio of CD4+ T cells to CD8+ T cells, compared with control mice, presumably reflecting effects of chronic HIV infection (P = .06; Figure 7E).

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Herpes simplex virus (HSV) induces a decline in CD3+ cell counts in draining lymph nodes. Lymph nodes were harvested from control mice (C) or human immunodeficiency virus–transgenic mice (T) on days 2 and 8 after infection. Cells (5 × 105) were stained, fixed, and evaluated for the expression of CD3 (T cells; A) or CD19 (B cells; B) and then, within the CD3+ population, for expression of CD4 (C) and CD8 (D), by acquiring 10 000 live events after staining with a Live/Dead marker. (E), The ratio of CD3+CD4+ cells to CD3+CD8+ cells was calculated. Data are mean values + standard error of the mean of results obtained for 4–16 mice. *P < .05, by the unpaired t test, for differences between the HSV-2–infected group and the respective mock-infected group.

DISCUSSION

The current study provides the first in vivo model of HSV-2/HIV-1 coinfection in the setting of chronic HIV-1 whose predictive value is indicated by its recapitulation of several key clinical observations, including increased genital tract shedding of HIV following HSV-2 infection and increased susceptibility to HSV-2 in the setting of chronic HIV infection. Use of this model enabled us to identify several molecular mechanisms relevant to the synergistic interactions between HIV and HSV-2 that occur in coinfected individuals. Specifically, we found that, although HIV-TG and control mice responded to HSV-2 infection with local release of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines that was paralleled by upregulated gene expression, the latter responses were delayed in HIV-TG mice. The acute release of cytokines into the genital tract could directly activate the HIV LTR and increase local HIV replication, as evidenced by the significantly higher HIV loads in vaginal washes detected 1 day after infection. In addition, the delayed inflammatory response illustrated by the histological findings of acute inflammation on day 8 after infection in HIV-TG mice could further promote HIV replication through recruitment of immune target cells.

The decreased expression of RANTES and several IFN genes in genital tract tissue from mock-infected HIV-TG mice, compared with control mice, on day 2 (but not day 8), coupled with the delayed and/or reduced upregulation of RANTES, MIP-1β, and IFN-γ in response to HSV-2 (Figures 4 and 5), are indicative of immune cell dysfunction and consistent with human studies of chronic HIV infection. For example, one study found that peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) isolated from subjects with chronic HIV infection exhibited impaired T-helper 1 cell (Th1) responses to nonspecific stimulation with PHA, including RANTES, MIP-1β, and IFN-γ, and that the responses recovered after introduction of antiretroviral therapy [25]. In that study, PBMC IL-17α responses were also impaired, whereas HSV-2 induced a delayed but significant increase in mucosal IL-17α expression in HIV-TG (but not control) mice. Impaired Th1 responses may be related to the activation and exhaustion status of memory T cells, but this has not been examined in genital tract tissue.

The upregulation of IL-17α, which recruits monocytes and neutrophils into sites of inflammation [26], may have contributed to the inflammation observed histologically on day 8 after infection in the HIV-TG mice, the trend toward greater epithelial disease (P = .07), and the increase in HIV shedding. The role of IL-17α in genital herpes has not been evaluated, although a recent study found that IL-17α–producing CD4+ T cells (T-helper 17 cells [Th17]) contributed to the pathogenesis of HSV stromal keratitis in a murine model [27]. Notably, Th17 may be preferentially infected by HIV, possibly because of their increased activation state and expression of CCR5 coreceptors, and are rapidly depleted in the gut (but not the respiratory tract) following HIV infection [28, 29]. The HIV-TG mice provide a model to study specific T-cell populations in the different anatomic compartments and their response to coinfection.

The observation that HIV-TG mice were more susceptible to HSV-2 following exposure to lower doses of virus (Figure 1) provides a possible mechanistic basis for the epidemiologic findings of an increased risk of acquiring HSV-2 among HIV-infected hosts, compared with HIV-uninfected hosts [30, 31]. The finding of early and more severe neurological disease scores was unanticipated but is consistent with anecdotal case reports suggesting that neurological complications of HSV-2 infection, such as transverse myelitis, lumbosacral radiculoneuropathy, and encephalitis, while rare, are more common in the setting of HIV infection [3234]. The difference in susceptibility and in disease manifestations may be related to the delayed mucosal innate immune response. Specifically, there was no increase in IFN-β gene expression and a delayed IFN-γ response in HIV-TG mice following HSV-2 infection (Figure 5).

There was no increase in HSV-2 levels and only a trend toward an increase in HIV levels in the extracted neurological tissue (Figure 2), suggesting that the viral loads do not directly contribute to the increase in neurological disease observed in the coinfected mice. The increase in paralysis may reflect the significant downregulation of SLPI in neuronal tissue in response to coinfection. Other studies have shown that SLPI has neuroprotective functions and promoted axonal regeneration [21]; inhibited cleavage of progranulin, a neuronal growth factor [22]; and protected mice from ischemic brain injury [23]. Notably, we previously found that HSV-2 triggers the rapid downregulation of SLPI in vitro in several cell types, although neuronal cells were not studied [24]. However, SLPI was not detected in genital tract tissue harvested from HIV-TG or control mice at any time point or from mice that were not pretreated with medroxyprogesterone (data not shown). Untreated mice were evaluated because human studies suggest that medroxyprogesterone downregulates SLPI expression in endometrial tissue [35]. The inability to detect SLPI in murine genital tract tissue may be a limitation of the model.

In summary, we describe the first small-animal model of mucosal HIV-1/HSV-2 coinfection in the setting of chronic HIV infection, which recapitulated several well-described epidemiological findings, including an increase in HIV shedding following HSV-2 infection and a more rapid course of HSV-2 disease in the setting of chronic HIV infection. Importantly, the model provides several insights into potential molecular mechanisms that could contribute to the clinical associations between these 2 viruses, including the role of genital tract IL-17α and neuronal SLPI, and thus identifies potential new targets for intervention. Further experiments with this model may identify additional mechanisms by which HIV and HSV-2 infections synergize to support coinfection and more-severe morbidity. The model could also be used to evaluate the influence of antivirals on coinfection and could be modified to study recurrent HSV-2 infection in the setting of HIV infection by treating the mice with intermittent acyclovir [36].

Notes

Acknowledgments. We thank Theodore Segarra and Kimdar Kemal for technical assistance. Dr. Harris Goldstein is the Charles Michael Chair in Autoimmune Diseases.

Disclaimer. The contents of this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of the National Institutes of Health.

Financial support. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH; grants R01AI065309, U19AI067980, and R01DA033788) and the Center for AIDS Research at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center (NIH grant AI-51519).

Potential conflicts of interest. All authors: No reported conflicts.

All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.

References

  • 1.Nagot N, Ouedraogo A, Defer MC, Vallo R, Mayaud P, Van de Perre P. Association between bacterial vaginosis and herpes simplex virus type-2 infection: implications for HIV acquisition studies. Sex Transm Infect. 2007;83:365–8. doi: 10.1136/sti.2007.024794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wald A, Corey L. How does herpes simplex virus type 2 influence human immunodeficiency virus infection and pathogenesis? J Infect Dis. 2003;187:1509–12. doi: 10.1086/374976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Corey L. Synergistic copathogens–HIV-1 and HSV-2. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:854–6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe068302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Celum C, Wald A, Hughes J, et al. Effect of aciclovir on HIV-1 acquisition in herpes simplex virus 2 seropositive women and men who have sex with men: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;371:2109–19. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60920-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nagot N, Ouedraogo A, Foulongne V, et al. Reduction of HIV-1 RNA levels with therapy to suppress herpes simplex virus. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:790–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa062607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Watson-Jones D, Weiss HA, Rusizoka M, et al. Effect of herpes simplex suppression on incidence of HIV among women in Tanzania. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1560–71. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0800260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chen L, Jha P, Stirling B, et al. Sexual risk factors for HIV infection in early and advanced HIV epidemics in sub-Saharan Africa: systematic overview of 68 epidemiological studies. PLoS One. 2007;2:e1001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ameli N, Bacchetti P, Morrow RA, et al. Herpes simplex virus infection in women in the WIHS: epidemiology and effect of antiretroviral therapy on clinical manifestations. AIDS. 2006;20:1051–8. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000222078.75867.77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Patterson J, Hitti J, Selke S, et al. Genital HSV detection among HIV-1-infected pregnant women in labor. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2011;2011:157680. doi: 10.1155/2011/157680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Crostarosa F, Aravantinou M, Akpogheneta OJ, et al. A macaque model to study vaginal HSV-2/immunodeficiency virus co-infection and the impact of HSV-2 on microbicide efficacy. PLoS One. 2009;4:e8060. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Joseph A, Sango K, Goldstein H. Novel mouse models for understanding HIV-1 pathogenesis. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;485:311–27. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-170-3_21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zariffard MR, Saifuddin M, Finnegan A, Spear GT. HSV type 2 infection increases HIV DNA detection in vaginal tissue of mice expressing human CD4 and CCR5. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2009;25:1157–64. doi: 10.1089/aid.2009.0035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhang JX, Diehl GE, Littman DR. Relief of preintegration inhibition and characterization of additional blocks for HIV replication in primary mouse T cells. PLoS One. 2008;3:e2035. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sun J, Soos T, Kewalramani VN, et al. CD4-specific transgenic expression of human cyclin T1 markedly increases human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) production by CD4+ T lymphocytes and myeloid cells in mice transgenic for a provirus encoding a monocyte-tropic HIV-1 isolate. J Virol. 2006;80:1850–62. doi: 10.1128/JVI.80.4.1850-1862.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Segarra TJ, Fakioglu E, Cheshenko N, et al. Bridging the gap between preclinical and clinical microbicide trials: blind evaluation of candidate gels in murine models of efficacy and safety. PLoS One. 2011;6:e27675. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hendrickson BA, Guo J, Brown I, et al. Decreased vaginal disease in J-chain-deficient mice following herpes simplex type 2 genital infection. Virology. 2000;271:155–62. doi: 10.1006/viro.2000.0303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Folks TM, Justement J, Kinter A, Dinarello CA, Fauci AS. Cytokine-induced expression of HIV-1 in a chronically infected promonocyte cell line. Science. 1987;238:800–2. doi: 10.1126/science.3313729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wilson SS, Cheshenko N, Fakioglu E, Mesquita PM, Keller MJ, Herold BC. Susceptibility to genital herpes as a biomarker predictive of increased HIV risk: expansion of a murine model of microbicide safety. Antivir Ther. 2009;14:1113–24. doi: 10.3851/IMP1463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.John M, Keller MJ, Fam EH, et al. Cervicovaginal secretions contribute to innate resistance to herpes simplex virus infection. J Infect Dis. 2005;192:1731–40. doi: 10.1086/497168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wahl SM, McNeely TB, Janoff EN, et al. Secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI) in mucosal fluids inhibits HIV-I. Oral Dis. 1997;3(Suppl 1):S64–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.1997.tb00377.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hannila SS, Siddiq MM, Carmel JB, et al. Secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor reverses inhibition by CNS myelin, promotes regeneration in the optic nerve, and suppresses expression of the transforming growth factor-β signaling protein Smad2. J Neurosci. 2013;33:5138–51. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5321-12.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Suh HS, Choi N, Tarassishin L, Lee SC. Regulation of progranulin expression in human microglia and proteolysis of progranulin by matrix metalloproteinase-12 (MMP-12) PLoS One. 2012;7:e35115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wang X, Li X, Xu L, et al. Up-regulation of secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI) in the brain after ischemic stroke: adenoviral expression of SLPI protects brain from ischemic injury. Mol Pharmacol. 2003;64:833–40. doi: 10.1124/mol.64.4.833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fakioglu E, Wilson SS, Mesquita PM, et al. Herpes simplex virus downregulates secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor: a novel immune evasion mechanism. J Virol. 2008;82:9337–44. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00603-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nakayama K, Nakamura H, Koga M, et al. Imbalanced production of cytokines by T cells associates with the activation/exhaustion status of memory T cells in chronic HIV type 1 infection. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2012;28:702–14. doi: 10.1089/aid.2011.0073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fossiez F, Djossou O, Chomarat P, et al. T cell interleukin-17 induces stromal cells to produce proinflammatory and hematopoietic cytokines. J Exp Med. 1996;183:2593–603. doi: 10.1084/jem.183.6.2593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Suryawanshi A, Veiga-Parga T, Rajasagi NK, et al. Role of IL-17 and Th17 cells in herpes simplex virus-induced corneal immunopathology. J Immunol. 2011;187:1919–30. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1100736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.McKinnon LR, Nyanga B, Chege D, et al. Characterization of a human cervical CD4+ T cell subset coexpressing multiple markers of HIV susceptibility. J Immunol. 2011;187:6032–42. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1101836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Brenchley JM, Paiardini M, Knox KS, et al. Differential Th17 CD4 T-cell depletion in pathogenic and nonpathogenic lentiviral infections. Blood. 2008;112:2826–35. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-05-159301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mugo N, Dadabhai SS, Bunnell R, et al. Prevalence of herpes simplex virus type 2 infection, human immunodeficiency virus/herpes simplex virus type 2 coinfection, and associated risk factors in a national, population-based survey in Kenya. Sex Transm Dis. 2011;38:1059–66. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31822e60b6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mbopi-Keou FX, Gresenguet G, Mayaud P, et al. Interactions between herpes simplex virus type 2 and human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection in African women: opportunities for intervention. J Infect Dis. 2000;182:1090–6. doi: 10.1086/315836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Berger JR, Houff S. Neurological complications of herpes simplex virus type 2 infection. Arch Neurol. 2008;65:596–600. doi: 10.1001/archneur.65.5.596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Britton CB, Mesa-Tejada R, Fenoglio CM, Hays AP, Garvey GG, Miller JR. A new complication of AIDS: thoracic myelitis caused by herpes simplex virus. Neurology. 1985;35:1071–4. doi: 10.1212/wnl.35.7.1071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Corral I, Quereda C, Navas E, Perez-Elias MJ, Jover F, Moreno S. Sacral myeloradiculitis complicating genital herpes in a HIV-infected patient. Int J STD AIDS. 2005;16:175–7. doi: 10.1258/0956462053057666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Li A, Felix JC, Yang W, Jain JK. Effect of mifepristone on the expression of endometrial secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor in new medroxyprogesterone acetate users. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:872–5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Farley N, Bernstein DI, Bravo FJ, Earwood J, Sawtell N, Cardin RD. Recurrent vaginal shedding of herpes simplex type 2 virus in the mouse and effects of antiviral therapy. Antiviral Res. 2010;86:188–95. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2010.02.317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES