Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2014 Jan 27;9(1):e87547. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087547

Embryonic Caffeine Exposure Acts via A1 Adenosine Receptors to Alter Adult Cardiac Function and DNA Methylation in Mice

Daniela L Buscariollo 1,#, Xiefan Fang 2,#, Victoria Greenwood 3, Huiling Xue 4, Scott A Rivkees 2, Christopher C Wendler 2,*
Editor: Diego Fraidenraich5
PMCID: PMC3903656  PMID: 24475304

Abstract

Evidence indicates that disruption of normal prenatal development influences an individual's risk of developing obesity and cardiovascular disease as an adult. Thus, understanding how in utero exposure to chemical agents leads to increased susceptibility to adult diseases is a critical health related issue. Our aim was to determine whether adenosine A1 receptors (A1ARs) mediate the long-term effects of in utero caffeine exposure on cardiac function and whether these long-term effects are the result of changes in DNA methylation patterns in adult hearts. Pregnant A1AR knockout mice were treated with caffeine (20 mg/kg) or vehicle (0.09% NaCl) i.p. at embryonic day 8.5. This caffeine treatment results in serum levels equivalent to the consumption of 2–4 cups of coffee in humans. After dams gave birth, offspring were examined at 8–10 weeks of age. A1AR+/+ offspring treated in utero with caffeine were 10% heavier than vehicle controls. Using echocardiography, we observed altered cardiac function and morphology in adult mice exposed to caffeine in utero. Caffeine treatment decreased cardiac output by 11% and increased left ventricular wall thickness by 29% during diastole. Using DNA methylation arrays, we identified altered DNA methylation patterns in A1AR+/+ caffeine treated hearts, including 7719 differentially methylated regions (DMRs) within the genome and an overall decrease in DNA methylation of 26%. Analysis of genes associated with DMRs revealed that many are associated with cardiac hypertrophy. These data demonstrate that A1ARs mediate in utero caffeine effects on cardiac function and growth and that caffeine exposure leads to changes in DNA methylation.

Introduction

Increasing evidence indicates that alteration of normal prenatal development influences an individual's lifetime risk of developing obesity and cardiovascular disease [1][6]. Thus, understanding how in utero exposure to chemical agents leads to increased susceptibility to adult diseases is an important issue.

One substance that fetuses are frequently exposed to is caffeine, a non-selective adenosine receptor antagonist. Caffeine consumption during the first month of pregnancy is reported by 60% of women, and 16% of pregnant mothers report consuming 150 mg or more per day [7]. Caffeine exerts many cellular effects, including influences on intracellular calcium levels and inhibition of phosphodiesterase; however, at serum concentrations observed with typical human consumption, the major effects of caffeine are due to a blockade of adenosine action at the level of adenosine receptors through competitive inhibition [8].

Adenosine levels increase dramatically under physiologically stressful conditions that include hypoxia, tissue ischemia, and inflammation [9][11]. Adenosine acts via cell surface G-protein coupled receptors, including A1, A2a, A2b, and A3 adenosine receptors [12]. Of these adenosine receptors, A1 adenosine receptors (A1ARs) have the highest affinity for adenosine and are the earliest expressed adenosine receptor subtype in the developing embryo [12], [13]. Showing how adenosine plays an important role in development, recent data indicate that a single dose of caffeine given to pregnant mice leads to reduced embryonic heart size and impaired cardiac function in adulthood [14]; however, the mechanisms by which these effects occur are not known.

At present, our understanding of the long-term effects of in utero caffeine exposure remains modest. In animal models, embryonic caffeine exposure leads to teratogenic effects, including ventricular septal defects and intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) [14][19]. Other studies show that caffeine exposure as early as embryonic day 10.5 (E10.5) in mice can cause reduced embryonic cardiac tissue [14]. In addition, caffeine can induce defects in angiogenesis in zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos [14], [20]. In mice and zebrafish, caffeine affects embryonic cardiac function by increasing heart rates [21], [22]. Caffeine exposure increases expression of the cardiac structural gene myosin heavy chain alpha (Myh6) in fetal rat hearts [23]. In humans, there is little evidence that fetal caffeine exposure leads to morphological defects, but prenatal caffeine exposure is associated with an increased risk of spontaneous abortions and reduced birth weight [24][31]. Studies examining the long-term consequences of in utero caffeine exposure in humans have not been performed.

One recognized mechanism for transmitting in utero stress into an increased risk of adult disease involves epigenetic changes that include altered DNA methylation, post-translational modifications of histone tails, and miRNA regulation [32], [33]. Changes in DNA methylation patterns occurring normally during early embryogenesis can be influenced by nutritional and environmental factors resulting in long lasting effects in adulthood [34][36].

To provide further insights into adenosine and caffeine action in the embryo, we assessed the role of A1ARs in transducing the embryonic effects of caffeine in the mouse model. We also assessed the effects of caffeine on epigenetic modifications specifically DNA methylation patterns, and finally we examined caffeine's long-term effects on the heart.

Methods

Ethics Statement

All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at Yale University. All animal research was conducted at Yale University and concluded before corresponding author moved to the University of Florida College of Medicine.

Animals

Adenosine A1 receptor (A1AR) deficient mice were provided by Dr. Bertil Fredholm at the Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm, Sweden and were characterized [37]. These mice are on a mixed background (129/OlaHsd/C57BL) and breed normally with expected Mendelian frequency.

Timed matings were performed with A1AR+/− males and A1AR+/− females, and the day a vaginal plug was observed was designated as embryonic day 0.5 (E0.5). Pregnant dams were randomized into two groups and injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) at E8.5. This stage is a critical time during cardiac development when the heart has begun to function, the heart valves are forming, and the heart is beginning to loop in order to bring the different chambers of the heart into proper alignment [38], [39]. In addition, treatment of pregnant dams at E8.5 was chosen because it is during the embryonic development window (E6.5–10.5) when genomic DNA is being re-methylated [40], thus E8.5 is a stage sensitive to DNA methylation disruption. Group 1 was injected with vehicle 0.9% NaCl, and group 2 was injected with 20 mg/kg of caffeine (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) dissolved in vehicle. This caffeine treatment results in circulating blood levels equivalent to the consumption of 2–4 cups of coffee in humans and 65% A1AR occupancy [8], [14]. Analysis was performed on male offspring divided into six groups based on treatment and genotype; including 1) vehicle/A1AR+/+ (veh+/+), 2) vehicle/A1AR+/− (veh+/−), 3) vehicle/A1AR−/− (veh−/−), 4) caffeine/A1AR+/+ (caff+/+), 5) caffeine/A1AR+/− (caff+/−), and 6) caffeine/A1AR−/− (caff−/−). Adult offspring for each group were obtained from at least 4 different dams. Adult offspring were used for nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), weights, and echocardiography. The number of male offspring produced for these experiments came from 11 dams treated with vehicle including 8 A1AR+/+, 24 A1AR+/−, and 8 A1AR −/−, and 9 dams treated with caffeine including 8 A1AR+/+, 17 A1AR+/−, and 11 A1AR−/−. Of these mice some died before NMR and echocardiography, the Ns for each experiment are provided in the figure legends. In addition, 3–4 hearts from each group were used for histology and 3–4 hearts per group were used for RNA and DNA isolation. After birth, mice were weighed weekly from 2–8 weeks of age. Mice were euthanized by CO2 inhalation followed by cervical dislocation.

Nuclear magnetic resonance

Between 8–10 weeks of age, the vehicle- and caffeine-treated male mice were evaluated by NMR at the Yale Metabolic Phenotyping Center, as described [14], [41]. Animals were placed in a restraint cylinder for body composition analysis using the Minispec Benchtop NMR (Bruker Optics, Billerica, MA, USA). NMR analysis was used to assess absolute fat, lean mass, and free body fluid content, based on total body weight. Data were used to determine percent body fat (fat mass/total body mass ×100).

Echocardiography

Cardiac function of male offspring was assessed using echocardiography between 8–10 weeks of life, as described [14], [42]. Offspring were anesthetized with a continuous flow of isoflurane administered via nosecone and anesthesia levels were regulated to maintain heart rates between 400 and 500 beats per minute. Transthoracic 2D M-mode echocardiography was performed using a 30-MHz probe (Vevo 770; Visualsonics, Toronto, ON, Canada) [14]. Echocardiography and analysis of results were performed blinded.

The hemodynamic effects of caffeine treatment were assessed in dams as described [43]. Briefly, baseline data on heart rate and cardiac function were obtained as described above. Animals were allowed to recover for 30 minutes followed by treatment with either 0.9% NaCl (vehicle) or 20 mg/kg of caffeine. Echocardiography was then performed 30 minutes after treatment.

Adult cardiac histology

Adult hearts of male offspring were fixed by perfusion of hearts with 4% paraformaldehyde solution (PFA; Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA) containing 150 mM KCl and 5 mM EDTA. Hearts were embedded in paraffin, sectioned, mounted on slides, and analyzed as described [14].

DNA methylation array analysis

Methylated DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP) and NimbleGen DNA methylation microarrays were used to assess changes in DNA methylation patterns between caffeine- and vehicle-treated adult male mice. The groups studied included: caff+/+, caff−/−, veh+/+, and veh−/− mice. Two samples from each treatment group were used to generate the DNA methylation array data, which was then used for all subsequent pathway analyses. The use of 1 to 2 samples per group is common for this type of analysis, so our use of two samples is consistent with previously published reports [44], [45]. Genomic DNA from left ventricles was isolated using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). MeDIP was performed by following the NimbleGen DNA Methylation Microarrays Sample Preparation Instructions. Both MeDIP-enriched and non-enriched DNA were amplified using the GenomePlex Complete Whole Genome Amplification Kit (Sigma-Aldrich). Amplified DNA was hybridized to the Mouse DNA Methylation 2.1 M Deluxe Promoter Arrays (Roche NimbleGen, Madison, WI, USA) according to manufacturer's protocol.

DNA methylation array data were analyzed using methods developed by Palmke et al. 2011 [44] and by Tobias Straub (http://www.protocol-online.org/cgi-bin/prot/view_cache.cgi?ID=3973). Data were normalized within (Lowess-based) and between (quantile-based) arrays and probe level log2 ratio of Cy5/Cy3 (M-value) was used as a measure of MeDIP enrichment [46]. All DNA methylation array data were uploaded to the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and can be accessed via http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/; accession number GSE43030. Chromosomal distribution of DMR regions were analyzed by using Enrichment on Chromosome and Annotation (CEAS) in Galaxy/Cistrome [47]. Venn diagrams were constructed with Galaxy/Cistrome [47].

Pathway analysis of the genes associated with the DMRs was conducted using MetaCore Enrichment Analysis (Version 6.11, build 41105; GeneGo, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (Ingenuity Systems, Redwood City, CA, USA). The lists of differentially methylated genes and miRNAs were uploaded separately into the applications. MetaCore enrichment ontologies used included Pathway Maps, Map Folders, Process Networks, Diseases (by Biomarkers), and Disease Biomarker Networks. Ingenuity ontologies analyzed included IPA Core Analysis and IPA-Tox.

Bisulfite sequencing (BS-seq) was used to analyze the DMRs within the gene promoters and performed as described [48]. Bisulfite specific primers were designed with Methyl Primer Express v1.0 (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Sequence data were analyzed with DNAstar (SeqMan, Madison, WI, USA). The CpG methylation percentage was calculated as (total number of methylated CpG)/(number of CpG sites in each gene × number of colonies sequenced).

Global DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation

Global DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation of the left ventricular genomic DNA were measured with the MethylFlash Methylated DNA Quantification Kit and MethylFlash Hydroxymethylated DNA Quantification Kit (Colorimetric; Epigentek Group, Farmingdale, NY, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocols. The OD450 nm intensity of the colorimetric reaction was measured with Synergy HT Multi-Mode Microplate Reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA). Each sample was measured in triplicate, and assays were repeated twice.

Real-time PCR analysis

Total RNA from left ventricles of adult male offspring was extracted with RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen), according to the manufacturer's protocol. cDNA was synthesized using iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Primers were as follows: Mef2c forward: GATGCCATCAGTGAATCAAAGG; Mef2c reverse: GTTGAAATGGCTGATGGATATCC; Tnnt2 forward: CTGAGACAGAGGAGGCCAAC; Tnnt2 reverse: TTCTCGAAGTGAGCCTCCAT. For Myh6 and Myh7, primers were designed and synthesized by SABiosciences (Qiagen). For β-actin, primers were designed and synthesized by RealTimePrimers.com (Elkins Park, PA, USA), β-actin forward: AAGAGCTATGAGCTGCCTGA, β-actin reverse: TACGGATGTCAACGTCACAC. Relative abundance of target genes to β-actin transcripts in the cDNA libraries was determined with SYBR®Green (Applied Biosystems) in a GeneAmp 7300 Real Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). Each sample was measured in three separate reactions on the same plate. This assay was repeated three times. Amplification efficiencies of the target genes and β-actin primer pairs were tested to ensure that they were not statistically different. Differences in expression between the treatment groups were calculated with the 2−ΔΔCT method. Statistical differences between treatments were determined on the linearized 2−ΔCT values.

Caffeine assay

Caffeine levels were measured in the serum of dams by ELISA assay (Neogen, Lexington, KY, USA), as described [14]. A1AR KO female mice were treated i.p. with 20 mg/kg of caffeine and blood serum was collected 2 hours later.

Statistical Analysis

Data are presented as means ± the standard error of the mean (SEM). Analysis was performed with the statistics software package included with Microsoft Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) and GraphPad Prism 6.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Statistical comparisons between groups were performed with student's t-test assuming equal variance or with one-way or two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni's post-test comparison. P≤0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Caffeine treatment has no effect on maternal cardiac function

Female A1AR+/+ mice treated with a caffeine dose of 20 mg/kg were analyzed for serum caffeine levels and cardiac function. This dose of caffeine results in a circulating serum caffeine level of 37.5±1.5 µM (N = 3), similar to that observed in C57Bl/6 mice [14]. To test if caffeine treatment alters the hemodynamics of treated dams, we measured the heart rates as beats per minute (bpm) and cardiac outputs as milliliters per minute (ml/min) of adult mice before and 30 minutes after treatment with either vehicle or 20 mg/kg of caffeine. There was no significant difference with caffeine treatment in heart rate from baseline (447±6 bpm) to 30 min after caffeine treatment (462±12.5 bpm, N = 4), or in cardiac output from baseline (14.8±1.6 ml/min) to 30 min after caffeine treatment (15.0±0.6 ml/min, N = 4). As a control dams were treated with vehicle (0.9% NaCl), and no significant differences were observed in heart rate between baseline (442±18 bpm) and 30 min after vehicle (478±8 bpm, N = 4)) or in cardiac output from baseline (14.7±0.6 ml/min) to 30 min after vehicle (15.7±1.7 ml/min, N = 4). In addition, no significant differences were observed between either baseline or peak heart rate or cardiac output when comparing vehicle to caffeine treated mice.

In utero caffeine treatment leads to higher body weight in adult male mice

Pregnant dams were treated with one 20 mg/kg dose of caffeine or vehicle (0.9% NaCl) at E8.5. Male offspring were weighed weekly until 8 weeks of age. Beginning at 3 weeks of age, the caff+/+ mice were heavier than the veh+/+ controls (Fig. 1). The increase in body weight persisted throughout the study, caff+/+ mice weighed on average 2.47 grams more than veh+/+ controls. Because the absolute difference in body weight between the two groups was constant throughout the study, the percent increase in body weight peaked at 3 weeks with caff+/+ mice weighing 23.9% more than veh+/+ controls, and by 8 weeks of age the caff+/+ mice were 10% heavier than veh+/+ mice (Fig.1). Only A1AR+/+ mice treated with caffeine were significantly heavier in adulthood compared to A1AR+/+ controls. Comparisons of body weights between veh+/− (N = 20) and caff+/− (N = 15) or between veh−/− (N = 6) and caff−/− (N = 10) were not significantly different.

Figure 1. Embryonic caffeine exposure leads to increased weight in adulthood.

Figure 1

Male mice treated in utero with caffeine were weighed every week starting 2 weeks after birth. Between 3–8 weeks of age, caffeine/A1AR+/+ mice were significantly heavier than vehicle/A1AR+/+ mice. Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-test comparison was performed. *P≤0.05, **P≤0.01, ***P≤0.001. N = 8.

In addition to assessing body weight, we analyzed body fat in adult offspring by NMR. Even though there was a significant difference in body weight between the caffeine-treated group and the vehicle-treated group at the time NMRs were performed (two-way ANOVA, P≤0.04), no differences in the body fat content were detected among the different groups. The average percent body fat for the different treatment groups were veh+/+ 6.81±1.1% (N = 8), veh+/− 6.31±0.5% (N = 20), veh−/− 6.7±0.9% (N = 6), caff+/+ 6.96±0.8% (N = 8), caff+/− 6.22±0.8% (N = 15), and caff−/− 7.25±0.8% (N = 10). There was no difference in the percent muscle weight among the caffeine- and vehicle-treated groups (data not shown).

In utero caffeine treatment causes a thickening of the left ventricular walls and altered cardiac function in adult hearts

Cardiac function, wall thickness, and chamber size were measured by echocardiography in the adult male offspring of pregnant dams treated with caffeine or vehicle at E8.5. The groups examined included caffeine- or vehicle-treated and three genotypes (A1AR+/+, A1AR+/−, and A1AR−/−). Of these groups, only the caff+/+ vs. veh+/+ comparison revealed significant differences in cardiac function and morphology. Caffeine treatment lead to changes in adult cardiac morphology in the caff+/+ mice, including a 24% increase in left ventricle (LV) mass compared to veh+/+ (Fig. 2A). In addition, caffeine caused an increase in the thickness of both the left ventricular posterior wall (LVPW) and the interventricular septum (IVS; Fig. 2). The LVPW thickness was increased by 28.6% during diastole and 23.3% during systole, whereas the IVS thickness was increased by 24.5% during diastole and 14.3% during systole (Fig. 2).

Figure 2. Embryonic caffeine exposure leads to thickening of left ventricular walls.

Figure 2

Cardiac morphology was analyzed in adult mice by echocardiography at 8–10 weeks of age. (A) Caffeine-treated A1AR+/+ left ventricles were heavier than vehicle treated controls. Caffeine treatment of A1AR+/+ mice also caused increased thickness of the left ventricular posterior wall (LVPW) in both diastole (B) and systole (C), and increased thickness of the interventricular septum (IVS) in both diastole (D) and systole (E) when compared to vehicle controls. Vehicle/A1AR+/+, N = 6; Vehicle/A1AR +/−, N = 23; Vehicle/A1AR −/−, N = 8; caffeine/A1AR+/+, N = 6, caffeine/A1AR+/−, N = 15; caffeine/A1AR−/−, N = 10. Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-test comparison was performed. *P≤0.05.

The increased left ventricular wall thickness was associated with a decrease in the left ventricular internal diameter (LVID) by 13.2% at diastole and 28.9% at systole (Fig. 3). The reduced LVID was associated with reduced left ventricle volume, which led to a 12.5% decrease in the LV stroke volume (Fig. 3). The percent fractional shorting (%FS) was increased in caffeine treated hearts (Fig. 3), and cardiac output (CO) was reduced by 11.4% in caff+/+ (N = 6) mice compared to veh+/+ (N = 6) treated mice (P≤0.02 student t-test). Although we observed differences in the cardiac output for the caff+/+ group, overt heart failure was not observed.

Figure 3. Embryonic caffeine exposure leads to altered cardiac function.

Figure 3

Cardiac function of mice exposed to in utero caffeine was analyzed by echocardiography between 8–10 weeks of age. Analysis revealed that A1AR+/+ caffeine-treated mice had reduced stroke volume (A), increased % fractional shortening (B), reduced left ventricular internal diameter (LVID) in both diastole (C) and systole (D), and reduced left ventricle volume at both diastole (E) and systole (F). Vehicle/A1AR+/+, N = 6; Vehicle/A1AR+/−, N = 23; Vehicle/A1AR−/−, N = 8; caffeine/A1AR+/+, N = 6, caffeine/A1AR+/−, N = 15; caffeine/A1AR−/−, N = 10. Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-test comparison was performed. *P≤0.05.

Histological examination did not reveal differences in heart muscle structure among any of the groups but the caff+/+ group displayed thicker left ventricular walls compared to veh+/+ controls (Fig. 4). Trichrome staining indicated that there were no differences in connective tissue deposition or any evidence of scarring in adult hearts from any of the treatment groups (Fig.4).

Figure 4. No effect on connective tissue deposition in adult hearts was observed with caffeine treatment.

Figure 4

Adult hearts from mice exposed to in utero caffeine examined with trichrome stain to reveal heart muscle structure and connective tissue deposition. No differences in the amount of connective tissue deposition were observed between (A) veh+/+ and (B) caff+/+ adult left ventricles. However, caff+/+ left ventricles were thicker than veh+/+. N = 3. Scale bars = 100 µM.

In utero caffeine exposure alters the DNA methylation pattern in adult hearts

NimbleGen DNA methylation microarrays were used to investigate DNA methylation patterns in adult left ventricles. The Mouse DNA Methylation 2.1 M Deluxe Promoter Array was chosen because it interrogates DNA methylation in 599 miRNA promoters including 15 kb upstream of the transcriptional start site (TSS), 15,969 gene promoters regions that range from 8,000 bp upstream to 3,000 bp downstream of the TSS, and 24,507 known CpG islands in the genomic DNA. For the DNA methylation analysis, four groups were studied including veh+/+, veh−/−, caff+/+, and caff−/− groups. This analysis identified changes in DNA methylation patterns that were caffeine- and A1AR-dependent (veh+/+ vs. caff+/+), caffeine-dependent and A1AR-independent (veh−/− vs. caff−/−), and A1AR-dependent and caffeine-independent (veh+/+ vs. veh−/−).

Analysis of the different groups revealed that the veh+/+ vs. caff+/+ comparison had the greatest number of differentially methylated regions (DMRs) within the genomic DNA including both hypermethylated regions (4896) and hypomethylated regions (2823; Fig. 5A). Caffeine altered the DNA methylation pattern in the absence of A1AR expression (A1AR−/− mice) to a lesser degree than in A1AR+/+ mice. For example, the comparison of veh−/− vs. caff−/− only had 1024 hypermethylated regions and 1757 hypomethylated regions (Fig. 5A). In addition, the loss of A1AR expression alone altered DNA methylation patterns (Fig. 5A). Analysis of the differentially methylated regions revealed where in the genome the DMRs (either hypermethylated or hypomethylated) were located, including promoter regions, primary transcripts, known CpG islands or miRNA promoter regions (Fig. 5B, C).

Figure 5. Embryonic caffeine exposure caused a change in DNA methylation patterns.

Figure 5

Vehicle and caffeine treated mice with the same genotype were compared to identify differentially methylated regions (DMRs) in the genome (A). The veh+/+ vs. caff+/+ comparison identified the most differentially methylated regions in the genome following in utero caffeine exposure. Both (B) hypermethylated and (C) hypomethylated DMRs were detected throughout the genome with each comparison. Most DMRs were detected within the gene or promoter regions of the genome. The number of DNA samples per treatment group analyzed was 2.

A Venn diagram demonstrating the number of over-lapping DMRs from the different comparison groups indicated that the majority of DMRs are specific to each of the comparison groups (Fig. 6). The majority of DMRs in the veh+/+ vs. caff+/+ group were located in promoter regions less than 3,000 bp from the transcriptional start site (TSS) and in introns (Fig. 6). Further analysis of veh+/+ vs. caff+/+ identified the percentage of the total number of DMRs that were located on each chromosome (Fig. 6). The highest percentages of DMRs were located on chromosomes 2, 7 and 11, while the lowest percentage of DMRs was found on chromosome Y (Fig. 6).

Figure 6. Distribution of the differentially methylated regions.

Figure 6

(A) A Venn diagram indicates the number of DMRs that are shared by different comparison groups. The majority of DMRs within a comparison group are unique to that group with few regions detected in multiple comparison groups, and only 69 DMRs present in all three comparisons. (B) This chart illustrates locations in the genome for the DMRs identified from the veh+/+ vs. caff+/+ comparison. Analysis demonstrates that promoter regions from −1 to −3000 and intron regions contain the greatest percentage of DMRs. (C) In this chart, pink bars represent the percent of the genome that each chromosome contains and the blue bars are the percent of the total number of DMRs that are located on each chromosome. This chart identifies chromosomes 2, 7, and 11 as having the highest percentage of DMRs. N = 2.

Caffeine treatment alters DNA methylation of genes associated with cardiac hypertrophy

Because the veh+/+ vs. caff+/+ comparison revealed phenotypic differences in cardiac function and the highest degree of DNA methylation differences, all 7719 DMRs identified from this comparison, both hyper- and hypomethylated regions, were used for gene pathway analysis. Genes associated with these DMRs were examined with the functional ontology enrichment tool from MetaCore. MetaCore uses different manually created groupings of genes from different databases, including common cellular processes, networks, biological function, and disease, which are referred to as ontologies. These ontologies are used to identify gene pathways that contain genes associated with differentially methylated regions of the genome.

The first ontology examined was “Pathway Maps,” which groups genes into cellular processes, protein functions, and diseases. The top 20 most significantly enriched pathways within the Pathway Maps ontology included cytoskeleton remodeling, G-protein signaling, and NF-AT signaling in cardiac hypertrophy (Fig. 7, Table 1). Next, Map Folder ontology, which is a higher order analysis of the Pathway Maps ontology, was applied. Map Folder ontology group genes together from the Pathway Maps database according to main biological processes. The top pathways identified by the Map Folder ontology included cell differentiation, cardiac hypertrophy, and vascular development (Fig. 7, Table 1).

Figure 7. Significantly enriched cardiovascular related pathways.

Figure 7

Gene set enrichment analysis was done with the differentially methylated genes between A1AR+/+ mice treated with or without caffeine. The analysis was conducted with MetaCore Enrichment Analysis using the ontologies of Diseases (by Biomarkers), Map Folders, Pathway Maps, and Process Networks. Bars represent the percentage of altered methylation genes (in black) within a pathway. The numbers of altered genes and genes in a pathway are listed next to the bars, which represent the percentage of altered genes within a pathway. Dots indicate the negative log 10 of the P-values. Larger –log(P-value) means that the pathway is more significant. The threshold for significance is marked in the graph as a dotted-line at 1.3 (−log(0.05)). N = 2.

Table 1. Top 20 most significantly enriched pathways analyzed with MetaCore™ontology (N = 2).

# Pathways p-value # of changed genes # of genes in pathway
Pathway map folders 1 Cell differentiation 1.740e-23 264 928
2 Inflammatory response 4.068e-22 215 715
3 Tissue remodeling and wound repair 2.392e-19 168 534
4 Immune system response 2.051e-15 249 973
5 DNA-damage response 4.809e-14 114 354
6 Cell cycle and its regulation 6.934e-14 134 444
7 Apoptosis 1.836e-13 217 846
8 Mitogenic signaling 1.894e-13 158 560
9 Calcium signaling 1.913e-12 127 430
10 Cardiac hypertrophy 5.033e-12 70 190
11 Vasodilation 1.730e-9 98 336
12 Vascular development (angiogenesis) 1.790e-9 137 520
13 Hematopoiesis 3.383e-9 89 299
14 Cystic fibrosis disease 7.457e-7 150 636
15 Protein synthesis 7.583e-7 83 304
16 Protein degradation 1.106e-6 75 269
17 Vasoconstriction 4.797e-5 78 311
18 Myogenesis regulation 1.054e-3 28 95
19 Blood clotting 1.535e-3 65 278
20 Transcription regulation 4.933e-3 8 18
Pathway maps 1 Cytoskeleton remodeling_TGF, WNT and cytoskeletal remodeling 1.153E-11 47 111
2 Cytoskeleton remodeling_Cytoskeleton remodeling 2.479E-11 44 102
3 Cell adhesion_Chemokines and adhesion 7.871E-10 41 100
4 Cytoskeleton remodeling_FAK signaling 3.013E-09 28 57
5 Cytoskeleton remodeling_Regulation of actin cytoskeleton by Rho GTPases 9.497E-09 16 23
6 Signal transduction_JNK pathway 3.362E-08 22 42
7 Cytoskeleton remodeling_Role of PKA in cytoskeleton reorganisation 6.569E-08 21 40
8 Signal transduction_Erk interactions: Inhibition of Erk 7.428E-08 19 34
9 Cardiac hypertrophy_NF-AT signaling in cardiac hypertrophy 1.099E-07 28 65
10 G-protein signaling_RAC1 in cellular process 1.388E-07 19 35
11 Immune response _CCR3 signaling in eosinophils 1.513E-07 31 77
12 Development_Thrombopoietin-regulated cell processes 1.675E-07 22 45
13 Development_A2A receptor signaling 3.276E-07 21 43
14 Development_HGF signaling pathway 4.398E-07 22 47
15 G-protein signaling_G-Protein alpha-12 signaling pathway 4.410E-07 19 37
16 Immune response_Gastrin in inflammatory response 4.963E-07 28 69
17 Development_ERK5 in cell proliferation and neuronal survival 9.780E-07 14 23
18 Immune response_HMGB1/RAGE signaling pathway 1.280E-06 23 53
19 Development_Endothelin-1/EDNRA signaling 1.280E-06 23 53
20 Cell cycle_Influence of Ras and Rho proteins on G1/S transition 1.280E-06 23 53

The Process Networks ontology uses data from Pathway Maps, GO-processes, and network models of main cellular processes to identify significant gene pathways. The top 20 pathways identified by Process Network ontology included those involved with cytoskeleton regulation, cardiac development - BMP/TGF-beta signaling, and cardiac development – FGF/ErbB signaling (Fig. 7, Table 2).

Table 2. Top 20 most significantly enriched pathways analyzed with MetaCore™ontology (N = 2).

# Pathways p-value # of changed genes # of genes in pathway
Disease pathways 1 Psychiatry and psychology 2.383E-11 856 2837
2 Mental disorders 5.433E-11 848 2817
3 Heart diseases 2.347E-10 404 1227
4 Pathological conditions, signs and symptoms 1.042E-08 1191 4182
5 Familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 8.802E-08 15 17
6 Pathologic processes 9.621E-08 789 2694
7 Sensation disorders 3.025E-07 114 296
8 Nervous system diseases 3.070E-07 1344 4828
9 Myocardial ischemia 4.967E-07 261 793
10 Signs and symptoms 6.613E-07 717 2453
11 Functional colonic diseases 1.173E-06 23 36
12 Irritable bowel syndrome 1.173E-06 23 36
13 Anorexia 1.178E-06 32 58
14 Tobacco use disorder 1.589E-06 116 311
15 Renal insufficiency 2.090E-06 105 277
16 Vesico-ureteral reflux 4.129E-06 16 22
17 Short bowel syndrome 4.265E-06 9 9
18 Myocardial infarction 7.675E-06 149 430
19 Body weight changes 1.748E-05 67 167
20 Urologic diseases 2.104E-05 457 1539
Process networks 1 Cytoskeleton_Regulation of cytoskeleton rearrangement 9.303E-11 88 183
2 Cytoskeleton_Actin filaments 2.240E-05 71 176
3 Muscle contraction 2.270E-05 70 173
4 Cell adhesion_Cadherins 5.363E-05 71 180
5 Cell adhesion_Leucocyte chemotaxis 5.398E-05 79 205
6 Signal Transduction_Cholecystokinin signaling 7.924E-05 46 106
7 Development_Neurogenesis_Axonal guidance 9.138E-05 86 230
8 Development_ERK5 in cell proliferation and neuronal survival 1.878E-04 15 24
9 Reproduction_Spermatogenesis, motility and copulation 6.576E-04 82 229
10 Signal transduction_WNT signaling 1.103E-03 65 177
11 Proliferation_Positive regulation cell proliferation 1.416E-03 78 221
12 Cell adhesion_Platelet aggregation 3.250E-03 62 174
13 Cell adhesion_Integrin-mediated cell-matrix adhesion 3.411E-03 74 214
14 Reproduction_Male sex differentiation 4.308E-03 83 246
15 Signal transduction_NOTCH signaling 4.369E-03 80 236
16 Muscle contraction_Nitric oxide signaling in the cardiovascular system 5.285E-03 46 125
17 Neurophysiological process_Transmission of nerve impulse 6.304E-03 72 212
18 Cell cycle_Mitosis 6.696E-03 62 179
19 Cardiac development_BMP_TGF beta signaling 7.037E-03 43 117
20 Cardiac development_FGF_ErbB signaling 7.692E-03 45 124

The forth ontology examined, Disease (by Biomarker), uses biomarkers to group the genes into disease pathways. The Disease (by Biomarkers) ontology identified heart diseases, cardiomyopathy, myocardial ischemia, myocardial infarction, and body weight changes as some of the most significant pathways in this ontology analysis (Figs. 78, Table 2). There were many significantly enriched pathways related to the cardiovascular system including those related to cardiac disease, cardiac hypertrophy, and cardiac development and all these significant pathways are displayed together along with their P-values and the percentage of genes in the specific pathway that are affected (Fig. 7). Some pathways associated with growth were identified, but only four of these pathways had significant P-values (Fig. 8).

Figure 8. Significantly enriched body weight related pathways.

Figure 8

Gene set enrichment analysis was performed with the differentially methylated genes between A1AR+/+ mice treated with or without caffeine. The analysis was conducted with MetaCore Enrichment Analysis using the ontologies of Diseases (by Biomarkers), Map Folders, Pathway Maps, and Process Networks. Bars represent the percentage of altered methylation genes (in black) within a pathway. The numbers of altered genes and genes in a pathway are listed next to the bars. Dots indicate the negative log 10 of the P-values. Larger –log(P-value) means that the pathway is more significant. The threshold for significance is marked in the graph as a dotted-line at 1.3 (−log(0.05)). N = 2.

Further pathway analysis was performed by importing the genes associated with DMRs into the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) software. This analysis identified cardiac specific pathways in several larger ontologies including Diseases and Disorders, Physiological Development, Top Toxicity Lists, and Cardiotoxicity (Table 3). Many cardiac pathways were identified with the Ingenuity database including Cardiovascular Disease, Organ Development, Cardiac Hypertrophy, and Cardiac Output (Table 3). Many of the pathways found with Ingenuity were similar to those identified with the MetaCore software (Table 1, Fig. 7).

Table 3. Significantly enriched miRNA pathways from Ingenuity Pathway Analysis following in utero caffeine exposure. (N = 2).

Top pathways p-value # of changed genes
Diseases and disorders Reproductive system disease 9.04E-17 18
Cancer 1.61E-14 26
Hematological disease 1.97E-12 10
Endocrine system disorders 1.27E-11 16
Inflammatory disease 1.03E-09 11
Physiological development Connective tissue development and function 1.39E-03 4
Nervous system development and function 2.22E-03 1
Respiratory system development and function 2.22E-03 1
Tissue development 2.22E-03 3
Tumor morphology 2.22E-03 2
Cardiotoxicity Cardiac inflammation 4.78E-06 2
Congenital heart anomaly 2.60E-04 2
Cardiac dilation 4.14E-02 1
Cardiac infarction 4.51E-02 2
Pulmonary hypertension 4.78E-02 1

Of the top 20 most significant cardiovascular pathways identified from the different ontologies in MetaCore, five were related to cardiac hypertrophy and four were related to cardiac development (Fig. 7). Further analysis, of the genes affected within the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy ontology (Fig. 7), identified many structural genes including troponin I (Tnni3), troponin T (Tnnt2), troponin C (Tnnc1), α-actin C1 (Actc1) that are important for proper cardiac function (Table 4). In addition, 9 of the 40 genes associated with DMRs in the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy ontology express myosin heavy chain genes, including 2 that are critical for heart function and development, myosin heavy peptide 6 alpha (Myh6) and myosin heavy peptide 7 beta (Myh7; Table 4). Analysis of a more specific ontology, cardiac hypertrophy – NF-AT signaling, revealed similar genes as the general hypertrophic cardiomyopathy ontology such as Myh6, Myh7, Tnnt2, Tnni3, and Actc1 (Fig. 7; Table 5). The NF-AT ontology identified transcription factors that were associated with DMRs including GATA binding protein 4 (Gata4), myocyte enhancer factor 2c (Mef2c), and the transcriptional co-activator calmodulin binding transcription activator 2 (Camta2; Table 5). In addition, 9 out of the 28 affected genes in this pathway are guanine nucleotide binding proteins (G-proteins; Table 5).

Table 4. Genes in the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy pathway with differentially methylated regions following in utero caffeine exposure. (N = 2).

Gene symbol Accession Fold change P-value Feature
Myl3 BC061222 1.72 8.32E-05 Promoter
Bat5 (HLA-B) NM_178592 1.63 1.58E-03 Transcript & CpG islands
Myh14 (MyHC/Myosin II) NM_028021 1.58 3.47E-05 Promoter
ANP BC089615 1.57 6.76E-04 Promoter
Cav3 (Caveolin-3) NM_007617 1.57 8.13E-04 Transcript
Myh11 (MyHC/Myosin II) NM_001161775 1.56 2.57E-04 Transcript
Oxtr (Galpha(q)-specific peptide GPCRs) NM_001081147 1.50 9.77E-04 Transcript
PKC-beta2/cPKC (conventioanal) NM_008855 1.49 1.05E-03 Promoter
Pla2g2a (PLA2) NM_001082531 1.48 1.29E-03 Transcript
Cyp11b2 BC119321 1.48 3.89E-04 Promoter
Pla2g5 (PLA2) NM_001122954 1.47 5.62E-03 Transcript
Myh7 (MyHC/Myosin II/beta-MHC) BC121789 1.46 6.31E-04 Transcript
Mylpf (MRLC/Myosin II) NM_016754 1.43 1.17E-03 Promoter
Vcl (Vinculin) BC008520 1.42 1.12E-03 Promoter
Ndufv2 BC030946 1.41 1.07E-03 Transcript
Ppargc1b BC150699 1.40 1.74E-04 Promoter
Myh13 (MyHC/Myosin II) NM_001081250 1.40 1.66E-03 Promoter
Vwf (von Willebrand factor) NM_011708 1.38 1.29E-03 Transcript
Myh10 (MyHC/Myosin II) BC089011 1.37 3.31E-03 Transcript
PKC NM_008860 1.37 9.77E-04 Transcript
Tnni3 (Troponin I, cardiac) BC100590 1.35 1.38E-03 Transcript
Ppargc1 (PGC1-alpha) NR_027710 1.34 9.33E-04 Transcript
Myl1 (MELC/Myosin II) NM_021285 1.31 2.00E-03 Promoter & transcript
Actb (Actin) NM_007393 1.31 2.19E-03 Promoter
Igf1r BC138869 1.30 2.40E-03 Transcript
Ppm1a (PP2C) NM_008910 1.30 4.17E-03 Promoter
Edn2 (Endothelin-2) BC037042 1.26 1.48E-03 Promoter
Actc1 (Actin) BC062138 1.26 4.07E-03 Promoter
Myh1 (MyHC/Myosin II) NM_030679 1.24 9.33E-04 Transcript
Blat3 (HLA-B) NM_057171 1.24 1.55E-03 Promoter
Myl1 (MELC) NM_021285 1.23 2.14E-03 Transcript
Myh8 (MyHC/Myosin II) NM_177369 1.19 1.32E-03 Promoter
Myoz2 BC024360 -1.24 2.57E-03 Promoter
Ace1 NM_009598 -1.31 1.91E-04 Promoter
Igfbp1 (IBP1) BC013345 -1.40 1.05E-03 Promoter
LOC547349 (MHC class I) NM_001025208 -1.43 3.02E-03 Promoter
Tnnt2 (Troponin T, cardiac) NM_001130176 -1.51 5.62E-04 Promoter
Myh6 (MyHC/Myosin II/alpha-MHC) NM_010856 -1.52 2.04E-04 Promoter
Lamp2 NM_001017959 -1.52 7.59E-04 Promoter
Mybpc3 (Cardiac MyBP-C) NM_008653 -1.58 4.17E-03 Promoter
Tnnc1 (Troponin C, cardiac) NM_009393 -1.66 1.35E-03 Promoter

Table 5. Genes in the cardiac hypertrophy NF-AT signaling pathway with differentially methylated regions following in utero caffeine exposure. (N = 2).

Gene symbol Accession Fold change P-value Feature
Gng3 (G-protein beta/gamma) BC029680 1.93 1.51E-03 Promoter
Ctf1 (Cardiotrophin-1) NM_007795 1.64 8.13E-04 Promoter
Gnai3 (G-protein alpha-i family) NM_010306 1.63 1.86E-03 Promoter
ANP BC089615 1.57 6.76E-04 Promoter
Camta2 BC056395 1.57 5.25E-04 Promoter
Lif NM_001039537 1.52 2.69E-04 Transcript
Gng10 (G-protein beta/gamma) NM_025277 1.51 1.86E-03 Transcript
Pik3r2 NM_008841 1.49 3.39E-05 Transcript
Gng8 (G-protein beta/gamma) NM_010320 1.47 8.51E-03 Promoter & transcript
Myh7 (beta-MHC) NM_080728 1.46 6.31E-04 Transcript
Ark (PKB) NM_001110208 1.45 1.23E-03 Promoter
Mef2c NM_025282 1.44 2.75E-04/ Promoter
Gnas (G-protein alpha-s) NM_022000 1.43 3.55E-09 Transcript & CpG island
Shc1 NM_001113331 1.43 5.37E-04 Transcript
Adssl1 NM_007421 1.41 3.55E-03 Promoter
Map2k5 BC028260 1.40 1.10E-03 Transcript
Gng5 (G-protein beta/gamma) NM_010318 1.37 1.02E-03 Promoter
Tnni3 (Troponin I, cardiac) BC100590 1.35 1.38E-03 Promoter & transcript
Gsk3b NM_019827 1.34 2.63E-03 Transcript
PKC-epsilon NM_011104 1.34 5.13E-03 Promoter
Gata4 NM_008092 1.32 6.17E-04 Promoter
Igf1r BC138869 1.32 2.40E-03 Promoter & CpG island
Actc1 (actin) BC062138 1.26 4.07E-03 Promoter
Gnb3 (G-protein beta/gamma) NM_013530 1.25 6.76E-04 Promoter & transcript
Gngt (G-protein beta/gamma) NM_010314 1.23 3.09E-03 Transcript
Ppp3cb (Calcineurin A, catalytic) NM_008914 1.22 2.00E-03 Transcript
Gng2 (G-protein beta/gamma) NM_010315 1.18 1.95E-03 Transcript
Mef2d BC011070 1.18 1.74E-03 Transcript
Gnb11 (G-protein beta/gamma) NM_001081682 −1.21 7.41E-04 Promoter
Gngt2 (G-protein beta/gamma) NM_001038664 −1.43 1.00E-03 Promoter
Gnaz (G-protein alpha-i family) BC014702 −1.43 2.19E-03 Promoter
Tnnt2 (Troponin T, cardiac) NM_001130176 −1.51 5.62E-04 Promoter
Myh6 (alpha-MHC) NM_010856 −1.52 2.04E-04 Promoter
Mybpc3 (Cardiac MyBP-C) NM_008653 −1.58 4.17E-03 Promoter
MAPK5 BC100398 −1.59 1.02E-03 Promoter
Calm3 (Calmodulin) BC050926 −1.60 2.00E-04 Promoter
Ppp3cc (Calcineurin A, catalytic) BC141079 −1.62 2.19E-04 Promoter
Pik3cd (PI3K cat class IA) NM_001029837 −1.83 2.29E-03 Promoter

To elaborate on the DNA methylation array results, we selected several DMRs at different gene loci related to cardiac hypertrophy including Mef2c, Tnnt2, Myh6, Myh7, and Gata4 and body weight Ins2 for bisulfite sequencing. Of the six genes examined by BS-sequencing, 3 of them matched the DNA methylation array results including Mef2c and Ins2 which were both hypermethylated and Myh6 which was hypomethylated in caff+/+ (Table 6). Two genes, Gata4 and Myh7, showed no difference by BS-seq in caff+/+ even though they were both hypermethylated in the DNA methylation array results (Table 6). One gene, Tnnt2, was hypomethylated in the caff+/+ group in the array but hypermethylated by BS-seq. (Table 6).

Table 6. DNA methylation changes measured by bisulfite sequencing. (N = 2).

Gene name Gene symbol Genbank accession Strand Distance from TSS veh+/+methylation % caff+/+ methylation % Difference
Myocyte enhancer factor 2c Mef2c NM_025282 + −764 to −583 75.2% 90.8% Increased 20.7%
Insulin II Ins2 AA986540 - −699 to −698 68.8% 100.0% Increased 45.3%
Insulin II Ins2 AA986540 - −275 to −274 79.2% 93.8% Increased 18.4%
Troponin T2, Cardiac Tnnt2 NM_001130176 + −2494 to −2015 31.8% 55.6% Increased 74.8%
Troponin T2, Cardiac Tnnt2 NM_001130176 + −1838 to −1496 17.6% 38.3% Increased 117.6%
Myosin, heavy polypeptide 6, alpha Myh6 NM_010856 - −2095 to −2094 25.0% 4.2% Decreased 595.2%

TSS: transcriptional start site, caff+/+: caffeine treated A1AR+/+ mice,

veh+/+: 0.09% saline treated A1AR+/+ mice.

To determine if the DNA methylation changes observed between veh+/+ and caff+/+ affect gene expression, we performed quantitative real-time PCR. We examined the gene expression of Mef2c, Tnnt2, Myh6, and Myh7 in adult left ventricles. Hypermethylation of DNA is generally associated with a decrease in gene expression and this was observed for Mef2c but not Myh7, indicating that DNA methylation changes seen for Myh7 does not affect expression (Fig. 9). Hypomethylation of DNA is generally associated with an increase in gene expression, and that was observed for Myh6 (Fig. 9).

Figure 9. Relation between gene expression and DNA methylation.

Figure 9

Expression of critical genes in the cardiac hypertrophy signaling pathway was compared to their DNA methylation status measured by DNA methylation array or bisulfite sequencing. A1AR+/+ mice treated in utero with either caffeine or vehicle were compared. Expression or methylation differences are shown as fold-change of caffeine treatments divided by normal saline controls. Gene expression results represent data from three repeats of qPCR measurements (N = 3 per group, genomic DNA and mRNA were extracted from left ventricles of the same animals). Student's t-test used and error bars are SEM. * indicates P≤0.05.

Analysis of DMRs associated with miRNA sites and promoters identified many pathways and genes related to cardiovascular biology. Using the IPA software, several Cardiotoxicity Pathways were identified including cardiac inflammation, cardiac dilation, and cardiac infarction (Table 7). Analysis of the miRNA regions identified 103 regions that were significantly differentially methylated (Table 8). Of the miRNA promoter regions with DMRs, two were related to cardiac hypertrophy including miR-208b and miR-499 (Table 8) [49], [50]. These miRNAs are located within introns of the Myh7 and Myh7b genes. MiR-208b is located within intron 31 of the Myh7 gene which is also differentially methylated and miR-499 is located in intron 19 of Myh7b. However, unlike Myh7 which was hypermethylated, regions within the promoter for both miR-208b and miR499 were hypomethylated.

Table 7. Significantly enriched miRNA pathways from Ingenuity Pathway Analysis following in utero caffeine exposure. (N = 2).

Top pathways p-value # of changed genes
Diseases and disorders Reproductive system disease 9.04E-17 18
Cancer 1.61E-14 26
Hematological disease 1.97E-12 10
Endocrine system disorders 1.27E-11 16
Inflammatory disease 1.03E-09 11
Physiological development Connective tissue development and function 1.39E-03 4
Nervous system development and function 2.22E-03 1
Respiratory system development and function 2.22E-03 1
Tissue development 2.22E-03 3
Tumor morphology 2.22E-03 2
Cardiotoxicity Cardiac inflammation 4.78E-06 2
Congenital heart anomaly 2.60E-04 2
Cardiac dilation 4.14E-02 1
Cardiac infarction 4.51E-02 2
Pulmonary hypertension 4.78E-02 1

Table 8. miRNAs with differentially methylated regions in their promoters, ±1.35 fold change cutoff. (N = 2).

Accession ID Fold change P-value
MI0009955 mmu-mir-1958 2.09 6.61E-04
MI0004636 mmu-mir-497 1.76 1.02E-04
MI0000237 mmu-mir-195 1.76 1.02E-04
MI0006295 mmu-mir-466j 1.76 1.62E-03
MI0005515 mmu-mir-504 1.76 3.89E-03
MI0000817 mmu-mir-335 1.73 6.31E-03
MI0000730 mmu-mir-7b 1.66 6.76E-04
MI0000233 mmu-mir-191 1.63 8.91E-04
MI0001447 mmu-mir-425 1.63 8.91E-04
MI0009948 mmu-mir-1953 1.62 4.57E-05
MI0000394 mmu-mir-296 1.62 5.75E-04
MI0000398 mmu-mir-298 1.62 5.75E-04
MI0000584 mmu-mir-34a 1.56 3.31E-03
MI0009936 mmu-mir-1946a 1.55 2.24E-03
MI0000595 mmu-mir-324 1.54 3.63E-03
MI0009931 mmu-mir-1942 1.52 4.79E-04
MI0004652 mmu-mir-687 1.52 1.23E-03
MI0000570 mmu-mir-22 1.48 2.63E-04
MI0001165 mmu-mir-370 1.47 2.63E-04
MI0005496 mmu-mir-421 1.45 6.76E-04
MI0004125 mmu-mir-374 1.45 6.76E-04
MI0004123 mmu-mir-675 1.44 3.16E-06
MI0001146 mmu-mir-384 1.44 1.41E-03
MI0000691 mmu-mir-32 1.43 6.76E-04
MI0000702 mmu-mir-219-1 1.43 4.37E-03
MI0005482 mmu-mir-147 1.42 1.66E-03
MI0005521 mmu-mir-92b 1.41 2.04E-03
MI0000250 mmu-mir-207 1.41 7.94E-03
MI0009967 mmu-mir-1946b 1.39 4.57E-04
MI0000725 mmu-mir-125b-1 1.36 9.55E-04
MI0004258 mmu-mir-672 1.36 2.75E-03
MI0005552 mmu-mir-208b -1.36 1.00E-03
MI0010752 mmu-mir-2139 -1.36 1.62E-03
MI0000171 mmu-mir-149 -1.40 1.05E-03
MI0000227 mmu-mir-185 -1.40 2.24E-03
MI0009963 mmu-mir-1966 -1.43 1.41E-04
MI0004676 mmu-mir-499 -1.43 2.82E-03
MI0000799 mmu-mir-382 -1.44 2.04E-04
MI0000160 mmu-mir-134 -1.44 2.04E-04
MI0004134 mmu-mir-668 -1.44 2.04E-04
MI0003492 mmu-mir-485 -1.44 2.04E-04
MI0005497 mmu-mir-453 -1.44 2.04E-04
MI0000176 mmu-mir-154 -1.44 2.04E-04
MI0004589 mmu-mir-496 -1.44 2.04E-04
MI0000730 mmu-mir-7b -1.44 4.47E-03
MI0000583 mmu-mir-96 -1.46 5.13E-04
MI0000225 mmu-mir-183 -1.46 5.13E-04
MI0005475 mmu-mir-882 -1.47 2.40E-03
MI0003484 mmu-mir-483 -1.48 1.29E-04
MI0008315 mmu-mir-1905 -1.52 7.08E-04
MI0004708 mmu-mir-721 -1.72 1.17E-03
MI0009918 mmu-mir-1929 -1.84 1.00E-02
MI0004688 mmu-mir-704 -1.91 1.82E-03

Caffeine induces a decrease in global DNA methylation

The DNA methylation array interrogates the portion of the genome that is associated with promoter regions, CpG islands, and miRNA regions. To assess DNA methylation throughout the whole genome, a methylated DNA quantification assay was performed. The whole genome DNA methylation level was compared between veh+/+ and caff+/+ or veh+/− and caff+/− using DNA isolated from adult left ventricles. Caffeine treatment caused a 26% decrease in global DNA methylation in A1AR+/+ hearts, but no change in the level of DNA methylation was detected in the A1AR+/− hearts (Fig. 10). In addition, no significant change in global DNA hydroxymethylation was detected in either A1AR+/+ or A1AR+/− adult hearts following in utero caffeine exposure (Fig. 10).

Figure 10. Embryonic caffeine exposure leads to a decrease in global DNA methylation.

Figure 10

DNA was isolated from adult left ventricles of mice treated in utero with caffeine. (A) The percentage of 5-methylcytosine decreased in caff+/+ hearts compared to veh+/+ controls, but no change in global DNA methylation levels was observed in caff+/− hearts compared to veh+/− hearts. (B) But there was no change in the percentage of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in the left ventricular DNA in either the caff+/+ or caff+/− hearts. N = 3 per group, each sample was measured 3–4 times, student t-test, ** P = 0.0053).

Discussion

Our previous research demonstrated that A1ARs protect the developing embryo from intra-uterine hypoxia [51], [52]. The loss of A1AR expression in embryos leads to increased embryonic death and severe growth retardation under hypoxic conditions [51], [52]. Further studies demonstrated that hypoxia and/or caffeine treatment, which inhibits A1AR signaling, during embryogenesis had long-lasting effects into adulthood both on cardiac function and body weight [14]. We now demonstrate the importance of normal adenosine signaling through A1ARs during development, as disruption in A1AR action through caffeine treatment leads to increased body weight, reduced cardiac function, and altered cardiac DNA methylation patterns in adulthood.

Previous studies revealed that in utero caffeine exposure led to increased percent body fat in adult males but no difference in adult body weight was detected [14]. In the current study, we observed that in utero caffeine treatment increased body weight without a change in proportion of body fat. The possible reason for these differences vs. our previous studies may be related to the strain of mice used. The original examination was performed on C57Bl/6, an inbred strain from Charles River Laboratories; the current study examined the A1AR knockout line that is on a mixed background of 129/OlaHsd/C57Bl/6. The difference that we observe in metabolic function between the different mouse strains may be due to differences in DNA methylation changes in response to caffeine treatment. Further experiments into the strain differences in weight and body fat results will need to be performed, especially on an outbred strain. In both strains examined, it is important to note that early embryonic exposure to caffeine induced long-term effects in adult mice.

As with previous studies [14], this study demonstrated altered cardiac function, including decreased cardiac output. Previous reports indicated that in utero caffeine exposure caused a decrease in fractional shortening [14]. In addition, this study identified changes in heart morphology, including increased wall thickness following in utero caffeine treatment. Previous research showed that caffeine treatment affected the size of embryonic hearts [14]; in this study we observed increased ventricular wall thickness in adult hearts following early caffeine exposure. The increased ventricular wall thickness resulted in reduced ventricular volume and reduced cardiac output. The increased wall thickness and left ventricle mass that we observed are consistent with cardiac concentric hypertrophy, which is characterized by an increase in cardiac wall thickness with a reduced chamber volume. These results suggest that in utero caffeine exposure affects cardiac development, which leads to concentric hypertrophy in adulthood to compensate for reduced function. Concentric hypertrophy can eventually be maladaptive when stroke volumes are reduced and diastolic function is compromised.

Altered DNA methylation represents a potential mechanism for translating in utero exposure to caffeine into the phenotypic changes observed in adult mice, including increased body weight and cardiac hypertrophy. The developing embryo and heart are sensitive to factors that can alter DNA methylation at early embryonic stages including E8.5 [40], the stage at which we treated pregnant dams with caffeine. DNA demethylation and de novo DNA methylation are actively and passively occurring during early embryonic stages. After fertilization, paternal DNA is rapidly demethylated and maternal DNA is passively demethylated until implantation, when de novo DNA methylation increases between E3.5 to E10.5 in mice [40]. This period is critical for re-establishing DNA methylation patterns; therefore factors that affect methylation during this time window could have long lasting effects.

The ability of caffeine to alter DNA methylation and gene expression has been demonstrated for the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) gene in adrenocortical cells [53]. A change in StAR expression was attributed to the demethylation of a single CpG site in the StAR promoter following caffeine treatment [53]. Our analysis demonstrated that caffeine causes both a genome-wide decrease in methylation, as well as a large number of hypermethylated regions. The induction of both hyper- and hypo-methylated DNA regions in the genome by caffeine was also observed in cultured rat hippocampal neurons [15]. Although these data may seem contradictory, a global decrease and regional increase in DNA methylation has been observed in other biological systems including cancer [54], [55]. In addition, caffeine exposure decreased promoter methylation in L6 rat myotubes that was paralleled by an increase in the respective gene expression [56]. These observations and our data may indicate that changes in DNA methylation associated with caffeine treatment may be the result of more than one pathway. For example, caffeine may affect the activity or expression of both DNA methylation enzymes (DNMTs) and demethylation agents (Tets). The altered activity of these enzymes could then lead to the altered DNA methylation patterns we and others observe. The genes affected by altered DNA methylation may be dependent on the tissue and the timing of treatment. For example, caffeine treatment at E8.5 leads to altered DNA methylation and altered expression of genes associated with cardiac hypertrophy in the adult heart.

Several cardiac hypertrophic pathways were identified with altered DNA methylation patterns following caffeine treatment. The cardiac hypertrophy pathway was identified within multiple databases. Because the cardiac hypertrophy pathways identified by ontology were consistent with the phenotype observed in adult offspring of pregnant dams treated with caffeine, we further analyzed the differentially methylated genes within these pathways. Although we discovered many genes associated with cardiac hypertrophy that displayed altered DNA methylation patterns, not all of these changes will necessarily affect gene expression. To initially analyze the functional effects of altered DNA methylation on gene expression, we performed bisulfite sequencing to identify which DNA methylation sites were changed. Next, we performed real-time PCR to examine the expression level of genes associated with differentially methylated regions.

The first set of genes analyzed were part of the “NF-AT signaling in cardiac hypertrophy” pathway. Cardiac hypertrophy is mediated by three main transcription factors Mef2, NF-AT, and Gata4 [57], and all of these genes were linked with changes in DNA methylation in our analysis. We analyzed two of these genes further (Mef2c and Gata4) and demonstrated that an increase in methylation in the promoter region of Mef2c correlates with a decrease in Mef2c gene expression in the adult heart. Further analysis of NF-AT3 and Mef2d, which both show altered DNA methylation patterns and are important factors during cardiac hypertrophy, is also warranted [57].

We also analyzed myosin heavy chain alpha (Myh6) and myosin heavy chain beta (Myh7), as their expression is altered during cardiac hypertrophy [50], [57]. During development Myh6 and Myh7 are expressed differently with Myh7 as the predominant fetal isoform and Myh6 as the dominate form in adults mice [58]. Myh7 is still expressed in adulthood but an increase in its expression during adulthood is a common feature of cardiac hypertrophy [59]. Our analysis revealed that both Myh6 and Myh7 were up-regulated at the level of gene expression. The increase in Myh6 expression was consistent with a decrease in DNA methylation in its promoter region. However, DNA methylation analysis by both BS-seq and methylation array indicated an increase in DNA methylation in the Myh7 transcript region. This apparent disconnect between DNA methylation status and gene expression level for Myh7 may be explained in part by the fact that the promoter region for miR-208b was hypomethylated. MiR-208b is encoded within an intron of the Myh7 gene, such that an increase in miR-208b expression could also result in an increase in Myh7 expression due to the fact that they are co-regulated [50]. We observed by real-time PCR an up-regulation of Myh7 gene expression which is consistent with the phenotype of cardiac hypertrophy observed. Future analysis will focus on elucidating the mechanism by which caffeine exposure causes changes in Myh6 and Myh7 methylation, and identifying the specific methylation sites that are important for regulating their expression.

The changes observed with caffeine treatment were seen only when A1ARs were expressed. Loss of A1ARs in the knockout mice (A1AR−/−) protected the embryos and adults from effects of in utero caffeine exposure. These findings indicate that A1ARs mediate the effects of caffeine on the developing embryo that lead to long-term changes in cardiac function and body weight as well as long-term changes in DNA methylation patterns. Although we observed changes in DNA methylation in response to caffeine in the absence of A1AR expression, there were fewer differences and we did not observe effects on cardiac function or body weight in these treated mice. These data indicate that caffeine has specific effects on DNA methylation by acting through A1ARs and producing a specific phenotype. In addition, these results suggest that embryonic and cardiac developments are sensitive to changes in A1AR action.

Some of the limitations of this study include the number of animals examined and using i.p. injection as the route of caffeine administration, which is not the normal way of ingesting caffeine in humans. Many parameters, including route of administration, number of exposures including chronic exposure and peak serum levels, need to be considered before commenting on the risk of caffeine exposure in humans [60]. In our previous study, we did not see differences in adult female percent body fat with in utero caffeine treatment, which is one reason female mice were not examined in this study [14]. Further studies on the effect of in utero caffeine on females will need to be performed in order to overcome this limitation. Caffeine has also been shown to have beneficial effects in neurological and immunological disorders_ENREF_59 [61][63]. Thus further clinical and animal studies are needed to assess the effectiveness and safety of caffeine treatment during human pregnancy before recommendations can be made.

This report begins to answer an important question: does in utero caffeine exposure increase the susceptibility of an individual developing cardiac or metabolic disease in adulthood? This study is an initial step that indicates that in utero caffeine exposure can have long lasting effects into adulthood and that caffeine can alter the DNA methylation pattern in the heart during early stages of embryonic development.

Acknowledgments

We thank Ryan Poulsen and Sarah Renzi for technical assistance.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by a grant from NIH R01 HD058086 (Scott Rivkees and Christopher Wendler). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1. Curtis LH, Hammill BG, Bethel MA, Anstrom KJ, Gottdiener JS, et al. (2007) Costs of the metabolic syndrome in elderly individuals: findings from the Cardiovascular Health Study. Diabetes Care 30: 2553–2558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Balkau B, Valensi P, Eschwege E, Slama G (2007) A review of the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Metab 33: 405–413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Cooper-DeHoff RM, Pepine CJ (2007) Metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease: challenges and opportunities. Clin Cardiol 30: 593–597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Obunai K, Jani S, Dangas GD (2007) Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality of the metabolic syndrome. Med Clin North Am 91: : 1169–1184, x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Qiao Q, Gao W, Zhang L, Nyamdorj R, Tuomilehto J (2007) Metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease. Ann Clin Biochem 44: 232–263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Ogden CL, Yanovski SZ, Carroll MD, Flegal KM (2007) The epidemiology of obesity. Gastroenterology 132: 2087–2102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Browne ML (2006) Maternal exposure to caffeine and risk of congenital anomalies: a systematic review. Epidemiology 17: 324–331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Fredholm BB (1995) Astra Award Lecture. Adenosine, adenosine receptors and the actions of caffeine. PharmacolToxicol 76: 93–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Turner CP, Seli M, Ment L, Stewart W, Yan H, et al. (2003) A1 adenosine receptors mediate hypoxia-induced ventriculomegaly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 11718–11722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Koos BJ, Mason BA, Ervin MG (1994) Adenosine mediates hypoxic release of arginine vasopressin in fetal sheep. Am J Physiol 266: R215–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Rivkees SA, Zhao Z, Porter G, Turner C (2001) Influences of adenosine on the fetus and newborn. Mol Genet Metab 74: 160–171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Fredholm BB, Abbracchio MP, Burnstock G, Daly JW, Harden TK, et al. (1994) Nomenclature and classification of purinoceptors. Pharmacol Rev 46: 143–156. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Rivkees SA (1995) The ontogeny of cardiac and neural A1 adenosine receptor expression in rats. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 89: 202–213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Wendler CC, Busovsky-McNeal M, Ghatpande S, Kalinowski A, Russell KS, et al. (2009) Embryonic caffeine exposure induces adverse effects in adulthood. FASEB J 23: 1272–1278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Xu D, Zhang B, Liang G, Ping J, Kou H, et al. (2012) Caffeine-induced activated glucocorticoid metabolism in the hippocampus causes hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis inhibition in fetal rats. PLoS One 7: e44497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Christian MS, Brent RL (2001) Teratogen update: evaluation of the reproductive and developmental risks of caffeine. Teratology 64: 51–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Ross CP, Persaud TV (1986) Cardiovascular primordium of the rat embryo following in utero exposure to alcohol and caffeine. Can J Cardiol 2: 160–163. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Ross CP, Persaud TV (1986) Early embryonic development in the rat following in utero exposure to alcohol and caffeine. Histol Histopathol 1: 13–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Matsuoka R, Uno H, Tanaka H, Kerr CS, Nakazawa K, et al.. (1987) Caffeine induces cardiac and other malformations in the rat. Am J Med Genet Suppl 3: 433–443. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 20.Yeh CH, Liao YF, Chang CY, Tsai JN, Wang YH, et al.. (2012) Caffeine treatment disturbs the angiogenesis of zebrafish embryos. Drug Chem Toxicol. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 21. Buscariollo DL, Breuer GA, Wendler CC, Rivkees SA (2011) Caffeine acts via A1 adenosine receptors to disrupt embryonic cardiac function. PLoS One 6: e28296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Abdelkader TS, Chang SN, Kim TH, Song J, Kim DS, et al.. (2012) Exposure time to caffeine affects heartbeat and cell damage-related gene expression of zebrafish Danio rerio embryos at early developmental stages. J Appl Toxicol. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 23. Imamura S, Kimura M, Hiratsuka E, Takao A, Matsuoka R (1992) Effect of caffeine on expression of cardiac myosin heavy chain gene in adult hypothyroid and fetal rats. Circ Res 71: 1031–1038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cnattingius S, Ekbom A, Granath F, Rane A (2003) Caffeine intake and the risk of spontaneous abortion. Food Chem Toxicol 41: : 1202; author reply 1203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Cnattingius S, Signorello LB, Anneren G, Clausson B, Ekbom A, et al. (2000) Caffeine intake and the risk of first-trimester spontaneous abortion. N Engl J Med 343: 1839–1845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Signorello LB, Nordmark A, Granath F, Blot WJ, McLaughlin JK, et al. (2001) Caffeine metabolism and the risk of spontaneous abortion of normal karyotype fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 98: 1059–1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Rivkees SA, Wendler CC (2012) Regulation of cardiovascular development by adenosine and adenosine-mediated embryo protection. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 32: 851–855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Rivkees SA, Wendler CC (2011) Adverse and protective influences of adenosine on the newborn and embryo: implications for preterm white matter injury and embryo protection. Pediatr Res 69: 271–278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Vik T, Bakketeig LS, Trygg KU, Lund-Larsen K, Jacobsen G (2003) High caffeine consumption in the third trimester of pregnancy: gender-specific effects on fetal growth. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 17: 324–331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Weng X, Odouli R, Li DK (2008) Maternal caffeine consumption during pregnancy and the risk of miscarriage: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 31. Larroque B, Kaminski M, Lelong N, Subtil D, Dehaene P (1993) Effects of birth weight of alcohol and caffeine consumption during pregnancy. Am J Epidemiol 137: 941–950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Murgatroyd C, Patchev AV, Wu Y, Micale V, Bockmuhl Y, et al. (2009) Dynamic DNA methylation programs persistent adverse effects of early-life stress. Nat Neurosci 12: 1559–1566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Jirtle RL, Skinner MK (2007) Environmental epigenomics and disease susceptibility. Nat Rev Genet 8: 253–262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Dolinoy DC, Weidman JR, Jirtle RL (2007) Epigenetic gene regulation: linking early developmental environment to adult disease. Reprod Toxicol 23: 297–307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Waterland RA, Jirtle RL (2003) Transposable elements: targets for early nutritional effects on epigenetic gene regulation. Mol Cell Biol 23: 5293–5300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Ho SM, Tang WY, Belmonte de Frausto J, Prins GS (2006) Developmental exposure to estradiol and bisphenol A increases susceptibility to prostate carcinogenesis and epigenetically regulates phosphodiesterase type 4 variant 4. Cancer Res 66: 5624–5632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Johansson B, Halldner L, Dunwiddie TV, Masino SA, Poelchen W, et al. (2001) Hyperalgesia, anxiety, and decreased hypoxic neuroprotection in mice lacking the adenosine A1 receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 9407–9412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Olson EN (2004) A decade of discoveries in cardiac biology. Nat Med 10: 467–474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Gittenberger-de Groot AC, Bartelings MM, Deruiter MC, Poelmann RE (2005) Basics of cardiac development for the understanding of congenital heart malformations. Pediatr Res 57: 169–176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. He XJ, Chen T, Zhu JK (2011) Regulation and function of DNA methylation in plants and animals. Cell Res 21: 442–465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Cline GW, Vidal-Puig AJ, Dufour S, Cadman KS, Lowell BB, et al. (2001) In vivo effects of uncoupling protein-3 gene disruption on mitochondrial energy metabolism. J Biol Chem 276: 20240–20244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Jacoby JJ, Kalinowski A, Liu MG, Zhang SS, Gao Q, et al. (2003) Cardiomyocyte-restricted knockout of STAT3 results in higher sensitivity to inflammation, cardiac fibrosis, and heart failure with advanced age. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 12929–12934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Momoi N, Tinney JP, Liu LJ, Elshershari H, Hoffmann PJ, et al. (2008) Modest maternal caffeine exposure affects developing embryonic cardiovascular function and growth. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 294: H2248–2256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Palmke N, Santacruz D, Walter J (2011) Comprehensive analysis of DNA-methylation in mammalian tissues using MeDIP-chip. Methods 53: 175–184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Zilberman D, Gehring M, Tran RK, Ballinger T, Henikoff S (2007) Genome-wide analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana DNA methylation uncovers an interdependence between methylation and transcription. Nat Genet 39: 61–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Workman C, Jensen LJ, Jarmer H, Berka R, Gautier L, et al. (2002) A new non-linear normalization method for reducing variability in DNA microarray experiments. Genome Biol 3: research0048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Liu T, Ortiz JA, Taing L, Meyer CA, Lee B, et al. (2011) Cistrome: an integrative platform for transcriptional regulation studies. Genome Biol 12: R83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Fang X, Thornton C, Scheffler BE, Willett KL (2013) Benzo[a]pyrene decreases global and gene specific DNA methylation during zebrafish development. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 36: 40–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Espinoza-Lewis RA, Wang DZ (2012) MicroRNAs in heart development. Curr Top Dev Biol 100: 279–317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Callis TE, Pandya K, Seok HY, Tang RH, Tatsuguchi M, et al. (2009) MicroRNA-208a is a regulator of cardiac hypertrophy and conduction in mice. J Clin Invest 119: 2772–2786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Wendler CC, Amatya S, McClaskey C, Ghatpande S, Fredholm BB, et al. (2007) A1 adenosine receptors play an essential role in protecting the embryo against hypoxia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 9697–9702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Wendler CC, Poulsen RR, Ghatpande S, Greene RW, Rivkees SA (2010) Identification of the heart as the critical site of adenosine mediated embryo protection. BMC Dev Biol 10: 57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Ping J, Lei YY, Liu L, Wang TT, Feng YH, et al. (2012) Inheritable stimulatory effects of caffeine on steroidogenic acute regulatory protein expression and cortisol production in human adrenocortical cells. Chem Biol Interact 195: 68–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Jones PA, Baylin SB (2007) The epigenomics of cancer. Cell 128: 683–692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Laird PW (2003) The power and the promise of DNA methylation markers. Nat Rev Cancer 3: 253–266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Barres R, Yan J, Egan B, Treebak JT, Rasmussen M, et al. (2012) Acute exercise remodels promoter methylation in human skeletal muscle. Cell Metab 15: 405–411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Frey N, Olson EN (2003) Cardiac hypertrophy: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Annu Rev Physiol 65: 45–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Lompre AM, Nadal-Ginard B, Mahdavi V (1984) Expression of the cardiac ventricular alpha- and beta-myosin heavy chain genes is developmentally and hormonally regulated. J Biol Chem 259: 6437–6446. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Chien KR (2000) Genomic circuits and the integrative biology of cardiac diseases. Nature 407: 227–232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Brent RL, Christian MS, Diener RM (2011) Evaluation of the reproductive and developmental risks of caffeine. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol 92: 152–187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Higdon JV, Frei B (2006) Coffee and health: a review of recent human research. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 46: 101–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Simon DK, Swearingen CJ, Hauser RA, Trugman JM, Aminoff MJ, et al. (2008) Caffeine and progression of Parkinson disease. Clin Neuropharmacol 31: 189–196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Daly JW (2007) Caffeine analogs: biomedical impact. Cell Mol Life Sci 64: 2153–2169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES