Skip to main content
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 2014 Feb 4;186(2):E86–E94. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.130776

Association between First Nations ethnicity and progression to kidney failure by presence and severity of albuminuria

Susan M Samuel 1, Luz Palacios-Derflingher 1, Marcello Tonelli 1, Braden Manns 1, Lynden Crowshoe 1, Sofia B Ahmed 1, Min Jun 1, Nathalie Saad 1, Brenda R Hemmelgarn 1,, for the Alberta Kidney Disease Network
PMCID: PMC3903763  PMID: 24295865

Abstract

Background:

Despite a low prevalence of chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate [GFR] < 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2), First Nations people have high rates of kidney failure requiring chronic dialysis or kidney transplantation. We sought to examine whether the presence and severity of albuminuria contributes to the progression of chronic kidney disease to kidney failure among First Nations people.

Methods:

We identified all adult residents of Alberta (age ≥ 18 yr) for whom an outpatient serum creatinine measurement was available from May 1, 2002, to Mar. 31, 2008. We determined albuminuria using urine dipsticks and categorized results as normal (i.e., no albuminuria), mild, heavy or unmeasured. Our primary outcome was progression to kidney failure (defined as the need for chronic dialysis or kidney transplantation, or a sustained doubling of serum creatinine levels). We calculated rates of progression to kidney failure by First Nations status, by estimated GFR and by albuminuria category. We determined the relative hazard of progression to kidney failure for First Nations compared with non–First Nations participants by level of albuminuria and estimated GFR.

Results:

Of the 1 816 824 participants we identified, 48 669 (2.7%) were First Nations. First Nations people were less likely to have normal albuminuria compared with non–First Nations people (38.7% v. 56.4%). Rates of progression to kidney failure were consistently 2- to 3-fold higher among First Nations people than among non–First Nations people, across all levels of albuminuria and estimated GFRs. Compared with non–First Nations people, First Nations people with an estimated GFR of 15.0–29.9 mL/min per 1.73 m2 had the highest risk of progression to kidney failure, with similar hazard ratios for those with normal and heavy albuminuria.

Interpretation:

Albuminuria confers a similar risk of progression to kidney failure for First Nations and non–First Nations people.


Severe chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate [GFR] < 30 mL/min per 1.73 m2) is almost 2-fold higher, and rates of end-stage kidney disease (defined as the need for chronic dialysis or kidney transplantation) are 4-fold higher, among First Nations people compared with non–First Nations people in Canada.1,2 The reasons for the higher rate of end-stage kidney disease when there is a lower prevalence of earlier stages of chronic kidney disease in First Nations people (estimated GFR 30–60 mL/min per 1.73 m2) are unclear. The rising incidence of diabetes is seen as the major cause of kidney failure among First Nations people;3 however, First Nations people without diabetes are also 2–3 times more likely to eventually have kidney failure.4 These observations suggest that diabetes is not the sole determinant of risk for kidney failure and that there are yet undefined factors that may accelerate the progression of chronic kidney disease in the First Nations population.5

Recent studies have highlighted the prognostic importance of albuminuria as a risk factor for kidney failure.6 Although ethnic variations in the prevalence and severity of albuminuria and their association with renal outcomes have been reported, these studies are primarily limited to non–First Nations populations.7 A limited number of studies have reported an increased prevalence of albuminuria among First Nations people, suggesting the potential association between albuminuria and risk of kidney failure.8,9 We sought to measure the presence and severity of albuminuria and estimate the risk of progression to kidney failure for First Nations people compared with non–First Nations people using a community-based cohort.

Methods

Study design and population

We performed a population-based cohort study of all adults 18 years of age or older in Alberta.10 We included adults for whom at least 1 outpatient serum creatinine measurement had been done for clinical care between May 1, 2002, and Mar. 31, 2008. We excluded patients who received dialysis or kidney transplant before cohort entry, or who had an estimated GFR of less than 15 mL/min per 1.73 m2. This study was approved by the University of Calgary Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board and the University of Alberta Research Ethics Office.

Classification of ethnicity

First Nations ethnicity was determined from a First Nations status indicator variable in the Alberta Health Registry file, which identifies people registered with Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada under the Indian Act. A person with a First Nations identifier at any point in time from Apr. 1, 1994 (the earliest date of the use of the First Nations identifier in the data) to Mar. 31, 2008, was classified as First Nations; all other people were classified as non–First Nations.11 First Nations people in Alberta not registered under the Indian Act (that is, without a First Nations status indicator in their registry files) were classified as non–First Nations, and they account for less than 30% of Alberta’s First Nations population.12

Assessment of kidney function and albuminuria

Glomerular filtration rate was estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation.13 The index value was categorized as follows: 90.0 or more, 60.0–89.9, 45.0–59.9, 30.0–44.9 and 15.0–29.9 mL/min per 1.73 m2.

Albuminuria was measured by urine dipstick on spot urine samples. For participants with multiple measurements of albuminuria, the median value was calculated from all measurements available for the 6 months before and 6 months after the index date (i.e., the date of the index estimated GFR). As in previous studies,14,15 albuminuria was categorized as normal (negative, median value of 0), mild (trace or +1, median value of 1 or 2), heavy (+2 or higher, median value of 3 or more) and not measured (for patients with no urine dipstick measurement during the 1-yr observation period). We chose to use albuminuria measured by urine dipstick rather than urine albumin to creatinine ratio, because urine dipstick measurements are available for more people. Furthermore, our previous work has shown that albuminuria is an important determinant of clinical outcomes, including progression to kidney failure, whether assessed by urine dipstick or urine albumin to creatinine ratio,14 supporting the validity of this measure.

Measurement of sociodemographic variables and comorbidities

Demographic data and comorbidities were obtained from health administrative data files. Neighbourhood income quintile (levels 1 [lowest] to 5 [highest]) and location of residence (urban v. rural) were defined using the participants’ postal codes, which are linked to data in the 2006 Statistics Canada Postal Code Conversion File (available at www5.statcan.gc.ca/bsolc/olc-cel/olc-cel?catno=92-153-X&lang=eng). Aggregate neighbourhood-level measures of income may have poor agreement with measures relying on self-reported individual household income. Nevertheless, higher incomes are associated with better health outcomes in both measures. Both measures are also comparable in their ability to identify variation in outcomes.16

Data on visits to physicians were obtained from the physicians’ billing claims database. Specialist care was defined as having at least 1 outpatient visit to a nephrologist or general internist in the year before the index date. Diabetes and hypertension were identified from hospital discharge records and physicians’ billing claims using validated algorithms.17,18 Comorbid conditions were defined from physician claims and hospital admissions data using validated coding algorithms and the clinical modification of the International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, and the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision.19 Health services data were captured for all residents of Alberta during the study period, regardless of movement within the province.

Outcome measure

Our primary outcome was progression to kidney failure, defined as the occurrence of one of the following events: chronic dialysis, renal transplantation or a sustained doubling of serum creatinine (i.e., levels twice as high as that of the index measurement for all subsequent measurements). This definition is often used in studies of renal outcomes.20 Participants were followed from their index date to the occurrence of the study outcome, their death (identified from the Alberta Bureau of Vital Statistics), their emigration from Alberta or the end of the study period (Mar. 31, 2009).

Statistical analysis

Baseline characteristics were described using means, medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) or proportions. Rates of progression to kidney failure by First Nations status, estimated GFR and albuminuria were calculated using Poisson regression, adjusting for sociodemographic variables and comorbid conditions. If the Poisson assumption that the variance equals its mean was not met, a quasi-Poisson model was used. Relative hazards of progression to kidney failure comparing First Nations versus non–First Nations participants were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models, by level of albuminuria and estimated GFR. To determine whether the relationship between First Nations status and outcome varied by albuminuria level and estimated GFR, interaction terms (First Nations and albuminuria; First Nations and estimated GFR) were used. We also included an interaction term for First Nations and diabetes to determine whether the relationship of First Nations status and progression to end-stage kidney disease varied with diabetes status. We used Schoenfeld residuals to test the proportional hazards assumptions for our variables of interest.21 We repeated all analyses using competing risk proportional subdistribution hazards methods defined by Fine and Gray.22 A significance level of 0.05 was used for all statistical tests. We performed all analyses using R statistical software.

Results

Participants

We identified 1 821 619 residents of Alberta 18 years of age or older for whom least 1 outpatient serum creatinine measurement had been done during the study period. Of these residents, 78% of non–First Nations and 72.5% of First Nations patients had 1 or more creatinine measurements during follow-up. We excluded 3168 patients who had received dialysis or a kidney transplant and 1627 patients with an estimated GFR of less than 15.0 mL/min per 1.73 m2 at the start of the observation interval. Our final cohort included 1 816 824 patients, 48 669 (2.68%) of whom had First Nations ethnicity.

Overall, First Nations participants were younger and more likely to live in a rural location in the lowest income quintile (Table 1) than were non–First Nations participants. The prevalence of diabetes and other comorbid conditions was higher among First Nations people than among non–First Nations people (Table 2).

Table 1:

Baseline characteristics of participants by First Nations status

Participants, %*
Non–First Nations
n = 1 768 155
First Nations
n = 48 669
Age, yr, median (IQR) 47.3 (24.3) 39.3 (21.1)
Female sex 55.6 59.6
Comorbidity
 Diabetes 7.1 12.4
 Hypertension 23.4 16.3
 Cerebrovascular disease 2.3 2.0
 Peripheral vascular disease 1.4 0.9
 Congestive heart failure 2.4 2.2
 Cancer 4.0 2.6
 COPD 13.5 23.3
 Dementia 1.2 0.7
 Metastatic solid tumour 0.5 0.4
 Myocardial infarction 2.1 1.9
 Mild liver disease 0.9 2.2
 Moderate to severe liver disease 0.1 0.3
 Paralysis 0.4 0.7
 Peptic ulcer disease 2.0 4.9
 Rheumatic disease 1.2 2.5
Visit to a specialist in previous year 9.8 7.3
Location of residence
 Rural 18.0 49.0
 Urban 80.6 50.4
 Unknown 1.4 0.6
Income quintile
 1 (lowest) 17.1 43.0
 2 18.0 14.6
 3 18.3 10.7
 4 20.4 9.0
 5 (highest) 20.5 9.8
 Unknown 5.7 13.1
Albuminuria
 Normal 56.4 38.7
 Mild 4.4 6.3
 Heavy 0.8 1.3
 Not measured 38.5 53.8
Estimated GFR, mL/min per 1.73 m2
 ≥ 90.0 54.2 77.0
 60.0–89.9 38.5 20.1
 45.0–59.9 5.0 1.9
 30.0–44.9 1.8 0.6
 15.0–29.9 0.5 0.3

Note: COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, GFR = glomerular filtration rate.

*

Unless otherwise indicated.

Table 2:

Baseline characteristics of participants, by albuminuria and First Nations status

Characteristic Albuminuria, %*
Non–First Nations participants First Nations participants
Normal (n = 997 803) Mild (n = 77 054) Heavy (n =13 295) Not measured (n = 680 003) Normal (n = 18 833) Mild (n = 3 061) Heavy (n = 607) Not measured (n = 26 168)
Age, yr, median (IQR) 46.6 (22.7) 48.2 (30.7) 53.9 (32.6) 48.2 (26.1) 39.1 (20.4) 38.1 (23.3) 41.3 (27.4) 39.6 (21.2)
Female sex 55.6 49.7 43.6 56.4 63.2 59.1 52.1 57.3
Comorbidity
 Diabetes 5.6 12.4 27.1 8.3 8.9 17.5 33.3 13.8
 Hypertension 20.5 30.8 47.1 26.4 14.3 19.0 35.3 16.9
 Cerebrovascular disease 1.6 3.3 6.1 3.1 1.5 2.2 4.1 2.3
 Peripheral vascular disease 1.0 2.2 4.3 1.9 0.6 1.2 3.6 1.1
 Congestive heart failure 1.4 4.0 8.1 3.7 1.3 2.6 7.1 2.6
 Cancer 3.1 5.2 6.9 5.2 2.2 2.8 3.8 2.8
 COPD 12.4 15.5 18.2 14.9 22.3 27.1 28.2 23.5
 Dementia 0.6 2.1 3.3 1.9 0.4 0.8 0.3 0.9
 Metastatic solid tumour 0.3 0.8 1.1 0.8 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.4
 Myocardial infarction 1.4 2.8 5.6 3.0 1.2 2.0 5.9 2.2
 Mild liver disease 0.7 1.0 1.5 1.0 2.0 2.6 3.6 2.2
 Moderate to severe liver disease 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.8 0.4
 Paralysis 0.3 0.6 1.7 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.8 0.8
 Peptic ulcer disease 1.9 2.4 2.8 2.2 4.1 5.3 5.8 5.4
 Rheumatic disease 1.0 1.4 2.0 1.4 2.7 2.7 3.1 2.7
Visit to a specialist in previous year 8.8 11.5 18.8 10.8 7.6 8.4 15.5 6.8
Location of residence
 Rural 12.9 19.7 19.0 25.2 34.2 48.1 51.7 59.7
 Urban 85.6 79.0 79.7 73.5 65.1 51.1 48.3 39.9
 Unknown 1.5 1.3 1.3 1.3 0.7 0.9 0.0 0.5
Income quintile
 1 (lowest) 17.5 19.4 21.9 16.2 39.5 41.0 43.7 45.7
 2 18.2 19.0 20.2 17.5 17.8 15.7 12.9 12.2
 3 18.2 18.3 18.21 18.4 13.0 10.3 12.2 9.0
 4 20.9 19.7 18.0 19.9 10.5 8.1 9.4 7.9
 5 (highest) 20.8 17.8 16.1 20.4 9.2 8.3 8.2 10.4
 Unknown 4.4 5.7 5.7 7.5 10.1 16.7 13.7 14.8
Estimated GFR, mL/min per 1.73 m2
 ≥ 90.0 56.0 49.4 36.6 52.5 77.1 74.6 56.7 77.7
 60.0–89.9 38.5 37.3 33.7 38.6 21.0 21.1 25.7 19.2
 45.0–59.9 4.1 7.9 12.8 5.9 1.5 2.4 6.4 2.0
 30.0–44.9 1.1 3.8 10.1 2.3 0.3 1.3 5.6 0.7
 15.0–29.9 0.3 1.6 6.7 0.7 0.1 0.5 5.6 0.3

Note: COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, GFR = glomerular filtration rate.

*

Unless otherwise indicated.

A greater proportion of First Nations people (97.1%) had an estimated GFR higher than 60.0 mL/min per 1.73 m2 compared with non–First Nations people (92.7%). First Nations people were more likely than non–First Nations people to have mild or heavy albuminuria (7.6% v. 5.2%). Most First Nations people (53.8%) had no measure of albuminuria, compared with 38.5% of non–First Nations people (Table 1).

Primary outcome

The median length of follow-up was 4.4 years for both non–First Nations and First Nations participants (IQR 2.9 yr for non–First Nations; IQR 3.0 yr for First Nations). Chronic kidney disease progressed to kidney failure in 605 (1.24%) First Nations and 10 990 (0.62%) non–First Nations participants. Among participants with an estimated GFR of more than 90.0 mL/min per 1.73 m2 at baseline, about 20% in both groups reached the outcome of sustained doubling of creatinine, but had an estimated GFR of more than 60.0 mL/min per 1.73 m2 by the end of the observation period.

Adjusted rates of progression to kidney failure were consistently 2- to 3-fold higher among First Nations participants than among non–First Nations participants for all levels of estimated GFR and albuminuria (Table 3). For example, among participants with an estimated GFR of 15.0–29.9 mL/min per 1.73 m2 and mild albuminuria, adjusted rates of progression to kidney failure per 1000 person years were 20.57 (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.85–42.94) and 9.44 (95% CI 7.85–11.34) for First Nations and non–First Nations participants, respectively.

Table 3:

Adjusted rates of progression to kidney failure per 1000 person-years, by First Nations status, albuminuria level and estimated glomerular filtration rate

Albuminuria Estimated GFR, mL/min per 1.73 m2

Non–First Nations participants First Nations participants


≥ 90.0 60.0–89.9 45.0–59.9 30.0–44.9 15.0–29.9 ≥ 90.0 60.0–89.9 45.0–59.9 30.0–44.9 15.0–29.9
Normal

 No. of events 969 1207 465 289 163 65 23 5 3 0

 No. of participants 559 096 383 776 41 144 11 337 2450 14 524 3959 281 54 15

 Adjusted* rate (95% CI) 0.48 (0.44–0.53) 0.46 (0.42–0.51) 0.76 (0.66–0.87) 1.30 (1.11–1.51) 3.44 (2.92–4.05) 0.97 (0.63–1.49) 0.84 (0.52–1.38) 1.56 (0.79–3.05) 2.75 (1.32–5.72) 9.15 (4.71–17.79)

Mild

 No. of events 219 385 176 186 174 31 15 0 3 4

 No. of participants 38093 28758 6121 2886 1196 2284 646 75 40 16

 Adjusted* rate (95% CI) 1.33 (1.16–1.53) 1.27 (1.1–1.46) 2.08 (1.75–2.46) 3.56 (2.98–4.25) 9.44 (7.85–11.34) 2.18 (1.23–3.87) 1.90 (1.03–3.51) 3.50 (1.66–7.37) 6.18 (2.82–13.58) 20.57 (9.85–42.94)

Heavy

 No. of events 138 262 196 267 359 11 19 10 15 25

 No. of participants 4867 4484 1705 1347 892 344 156 39 34 34

 Adjusted* rate (95% CI) 4.29 (3.69–4.97) 4.08 (3.51–4.74) 6.68 (5.64–7.93) 11.46 (9.63–13.64) 30.38 (25.57–36.10) 7.35 (4.27–12.65) 6.40 (3.62–11.31) 11.79 (5.92–23.49) 20.86 (10.48–41.50) 69.37 (38.91–123.70)

Not measured

 No. of events 1258 1956 916 762 643 187 90 38 24 37

 No. of participants 356 704 262793 39 766 15 875 4865 20 337 5031 531 182 87

 Adjusted* rate (95% CI) 0.89 (0.82–0.98) 0.85 (0.77–0.93) 1.39 (1.22–1.59) 2.39 (2.06–2.76) 6.33 (5.41–7.40) 1.98 (1.52–2.57) 1.72 (1.20–2.47) 3.17 (1.80–5.60) 5.61 (3.00–10.51) 18.67 (10.77–32.36)

Note: CI = confidence interval, GFR = glomerular filtration rate.

*

Adjusted for age (categories: 18 to < 40 yr, 40 to < 60 yr, 60 to < 75 yr and ≥ 75 yr), sex, diabetes, hypertension, location of residence, income quintile, specialist care and the comorbidities listed in Table 1. Interactions included in the model are ethnicity and albuminuria, and ethnicity and GFR.

For both non–First Nations and First Nations participants, not having a measure of albuminuria was associated with rates of progression to kidney failure that were intermediate to those for normal or mild albuminuria. In addition, the lowest rates of progression to kidney failure for both groups were seen in participants with normal albuminuria, and the highest rates were seen among those with heavy albuminuria.

Likelihood of progression to kidney failure

For all levels of albuminuria and estimated GFR, the adjusted risk of progression to kidney failure was significantly greater for First Nations than for non–First Nations people (Figure 1). The greatest risk of progression to kidney failure for First Nations people was among those with an estimated GFR of 15.0–29.9 mL/min per 1.73 m2, for whom risk was consistently 2- to 3-fold higher than for non–First Nations people with a similar estimated GFR. This increased risk was present regardless of the level of albuminuria, as well as among those with no measure of albuminuria. For example, compared with non–First Nations participants, the hazard ratio for kidney failure among First Nations people with an estimated GFR of 15.0–29.9 mL/min per 1.73 m2 was 2.92 (95% CI 2.09–4.07) in the setting of normal albuminuria, and 2.53 (95% CI 1.88–3.40) in the setting of heavy albuminuria. Similarly, among First Nations participants with no albuminuria measurement, the hazard ratio of progression to kidney failure was 3.22 (95% CI 2.45–4.24).

Figure 1:

Figure 1:

Likelihood of progression to kidney failure for First Nations participants, by estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria category. The model was adjusted for age (18 to < 40 yr, 40 to < 60 yr, 60 to < 75 yr and ≥ 75 yr), sex, diabetes, hypertension, location of residence, income quintile, specialist care and the comorbidities listed in Table 1. Interactions included in the model are ethnicity and albuminuria, and ethnicity and glomerular filtration rate. CI = confidence interval, GFR = glomerular filtration rate, HR = hazard ratio.

The interactions between First Nations status and diabetes, First Nations status and albuminuria, and First Nations status and estimated GFR were not significant, suggesting that progression to kidney failure was consistently higher for First Nations than for non–First Nations participants. In analyses accounting for competing risk of death, similar patterns in risk of progression to end-stage kidney disease for First Nations and non–First Nations participants were evident. In total, 2295 (4.72%) First Nations participants and 89 357 (5.05%) non–First Nations participants died before reaching the primary outcome.

Interpretation

We found that First Nations participants had 2-to 3-fold higher rates of progression to kidney failure than non-First Nations participants, across all levels of kidney function and regardless of the presence or severity of albuminuria. Compared with non–First Nations participants, the greatest risk of progression to kidney failure for First Nations participants occurred among those with the lowest estimated GFR (15.0–29.9 mL/min per 1.73 m2). These results were consistent regardless of the presence or severity of albuminuria, and after adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities and specialist care, as well as when death was considered as a competing risk. These results suggest that features other than those considered here contribute to the higher rates of kidney failure among First Nations people.

Our results are consistent with previous studies reporting rates of kidney failure 2- to 4-fold higher for First Nations compared with non–First Nations people, even among those who do not have diabetes.4,5,23,24 Similar to Dyck and colleagues, we report an age- and sex-adjusted rate of kidney failure that is 3-fold higher for First Nations than for non–First Nations people.24 Previous studies, however, have not included an assessment of albuminuria or potential modifying effects of albuminuria on risk of progression of kidney disease in this population. This is particularly relevant, given the association between albuminuria and progression to kidney failure in other populations.14

Despite a higher prevalence of heavy albuminuria among First Nations people, we did not find that the presence or severity of albuminuria conferred an additional risk to the development of kidney failure. Even among participants with no measure of albuminuria, risk of progression to kidney failure was similarly elevated for First Nations compared with non–First Nations participants within each category of estimated GFR. The increase in progression to kidney failure associated with an estimated GFR of 90.0 mL/min per 1.73 m2 or higher, consistent for all albuminuria groups, is likely due to the relationship of reduced muscle mass (reflecting ill health) to kidney function and progression to kidney failure.25 We conclude that albuminuria has no appreciable modifying effect on the association between First Nations status and progression to kidney failure. We suggest that there are unique factors relevant to First Nations people that determine progression to kidney failure, which are independent of albuminuria.

Differences in patient- or system-level factors may explain our findings. First Nations people experience lower quality of care and limited access to specialist care, and present with more severe chronic kidney disease despite having a similar probability of creatinine measurement, compared with non–First Nations people.26,27 Reduced access to specialist care for First Nations people with epilepsy has also been reported.28 Not all of the participants in our study had albuminuria measurements, with nonmeasurement more common among First Nations participants. This may represent an opportunity to improve care, because measurement of albuminuria is an indicator of overall access to care for chronic kidney disease.

Limitations

We used a community-based cohort with creatinine measurements obtained for routine clinical care, which did not include people who did not use medical services. However, we have previously reported that First Nations people are as likely as non–First Nations people to obtain a measure of serum creatinine.1

There is a potential for misclassification of albuminuria based on urine dipstick assessment, particularly when the measurement is based on a single measure. However, the percentage of participants with unmeasured proteinuria in our cohort is similar to that seen in other cohorts of patients with chronic kidney disease.29

Because we did not have information on variables such as blood pressure control, smoking status, individual income, mobility within the province, and for First Nations participants, medication use, residual confounding is possible.

Finally, we are unable to obtain further information regarding Aboriginal people (First Nations and non–First Nations) not registered under the Indian Act.

Conclusion

Our study provides important new information regarding the association of albuminuria and risk of progression to kidney failure among First Nations people, with albuminuria conferring a similar risk of kidney failure for both First Nations and non–First Nations people.

See also research article by Jiang and colleagues at www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.130721 and commentary by McDonald at www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.131605

Footnotes

Competing interests: None declared.

This article has been peer reviewed.

Contributors: Susan Samuel, Luz Palacios-Derflingher and Brenda Hemmelgarn conceived and designed the study. Brenda Hemmelgarn, Marcello Tonelli and Braden Manns acquired the data. All of the authors analyzed and interpreted the data. Susan Samuel, Luz Palacios-Derflingher and Brenda Hemmelgarn drafted the manuscript. Brenda Hemmelgarn collected the data. All of the authors revised the article for important intellectual content and approved the final version submitted for publication.

Disclaimer: This study is based in part on data provided by Alberta Health and Alberta Health Services. The interpretation and conclusions are those of the researchers and do not represent the views of the Government of Alberta.

Funding: This work was supported by an interdisciplinary team grant from Alberta Innovates – Health Solutions (AI–HS) and an operating grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). Dr. Samuel is supported by salary awards from the Canadian Child Health Clinician Scientist Program and the KRESCENT Program (Kidney Foundation of Canada). Dr. Tonelli, Dr. Manns and Dr. Ahmed are supported by AI–HS Salary Awards. Dr. Tonelli is supported by a Canada Research Chair. Dr. Ahmed is supported by a salary award from CIHR. Dr. Hemmelgarn is supported by the Roy and Vi Baay Chair in Kidney Research. The funding agencies had no role in study conception, study analysis or manuscript writing.

References

  • 1.Gao S, Manns BJ, Culleton BF, et al. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease and survival among aboriginal people. J Am Soc Nephrol 2007;18:2953–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dyck RF. Mechanisms of renal disease in indigenous populations: influences at work in Canadian indigenous peoples. Nephrology (Carlton) 2001;6:3–7 [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Young TK, Reading J, Elias B, et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus in Canada’s First Nations: status of an epidemic in progress. CMAJ 2000;163:561–6 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Samuel SM, Foster BJ, Hemmelgarn BR, et al. Incidence and causes of end-stage renal disease among Aboriginal children and young adults. CMAJ 2012;184:E758–64 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dyck RF, Tan L. Non-diabetic end-stage renal disease among Saskatchewan Aboriginal people. Clin Invest Med 1998;21:33–8 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gansevoort RT, Matsushita K, van der Velde M, et al. Lower estimated GFR and higher albuminuria are associated with adverse kidney outcomes. A collaborative meta-analysis of general and high-risk population cohorts. Kidney Int 2011;80:93–104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.McClellan W, Warnock DG, McClure L, et al. Racial differences in the prevalence of chronic kidney disease among participants in the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Cohort Study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006;17:1710–5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pavkov ME, Knowler WC, Bennett PH, et al. Increasing incidence of proteinuria and declining incidence of end-stage renal disease in diabetic Pima Indians. Kidney Int 2006;70:1840–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hoy WE, Wang Z, VanBuynder P, et al. The natural history of renal disease in Australian Aborigines. Part 2. Albuminuria predicts natural death and renal failure. Kidney Int 2001;60:249–56 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hemmelgarn BR, Clement F, Manns BJ, et al. Overview of the Alberta Kidney Disease Network. BMC Nephrol 2009;10:30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Population by selected ethnic origins, by province or territory (2006 census). Ottawa (ON): Statistics Canada; 2006 [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Aboriginal peoples of Canada: highlight tables, 2001 census. Ottawa (ON): Statistics Canada; 2001. Cat. no. 97F0024XIE 2001007. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 2009;150: 604–12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hemmelgarn BR, Manns BJ, Lloyd A, et al. Relation between kidney function, proteinuria, and adverse outcomes. JAMA 2010;303:423–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lamb EJ, MacKenzie F, Stevens PE. How should proteinuria be detected and measured? Ann Clin Biochem 2009;46:205–17 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Southern DA, McLaren L, Hawe P, et al. Individual-level and neighborhood-level income measures: agreement and association with outcomes in a cardiac disease cohort. Med Care 2005; 43:1116–22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hux JE, Ivis F, Flintoft V, et al. Diabetes in Ontario: determination of prevalence and incidence using a validated administrative data algorithm. Diabetes Care 2002;25:512–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Quan H, Khan N, Hemmelgarn BR, et al. Validation of a case definition to define hypertension using administrative data. Hypertension 2009;54:1423–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care 2005;43:1130–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lambers Heerspink HJ, Perkovic V, de Zeeuw D. Is doubling of serum creatinine a valid clinical ‘hard’ endpoint in clinical nephrology trials? Nephron Clin Pract 2011;119:c195–99 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Grambsch P, Therneau T. Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals. Biometrika 1994;81:515–26 [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fine JP, Gray RJ. A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc 1999;94:496–509 [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dyck RF, Tan L. Rates and outcomes of diabetic end-stage renal disease among registered native people in Saskatchewan. CMAJ 1994;150:203–8 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Dyck RF, Hayward MN, Harris SB. Prevalence, determinants and comorbidities of chronic kidney disease among First Nations adults with diabetes: results from the CIRCLE study. BMC Nephrol 2012;13:57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Matsushita K, van der Velde M, Astor BC, et al. Association of estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in general population cohorts: a collaborative meta-analysis. Lancet 2010;375:2073–81 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Shah BR, Gunraj N, Hux JE. Markers of access to and quality of primary care for aboriginal people in Ontario, Canada. Am J Public Health 2003;93:798–802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gao S, Manns BJ, Culleton BF, et al. Access to health care among status Aboriginal people with chronic kidney disease. CMAJ 2008;179:1007–12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Jetté N, Quan H, Faris P, et al. Health resource use in epilepsy: significant disparities by age, gender, and Aboriginal status. Epilepsia 2008;49:586–93 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hall YN, O’Hare AM, Young BA, et al. Neighborhood poverty and kidney transplantation among US Asians and Pacific Islanders with end-stage renal disease. Am J Transplant 2008;8: 2402–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES