Abstract
During early postnatal life, extensive changes in gene expression occur concomitantly in multiple major organs, indicating the existence of a common core developmental genetic program. This program includes hundreds of growth-promoting genes that are downregulated with age in liver, kidney, lung, and heart, and there is evidence that this component of the program drives the widespread decline in cell proliferation that occurs in juvenile life, as organs approach adult sizes. To investigate epigenetic changes that might orchestrate this program, we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation-promoter tiling array to assess temporal changes in histone H3K4 and H3K27 trimethylation (me3) at promoter regions throughout the genome in kidney and lung, comparing 1- to 4-wk-old mice. We found extensive genome-wide shifts in H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 occurring with age in both kidney and lung. The number of genes with concordant changes in the two organs was far greater than expected by chance. Temporal changes in H3K4me3 showed a strong, positive association with changes in gene expression, assessed by microarray, whereas changes in H3K27me3 showed a negative association. Gene ontology analysis indicated that shifts in specific histone methylation marks were associated with specific developmental functions. Of particular interest, genes with decreases in H3K4me3 with age in both organs were strongly implicated in cell cycle and cell proliferation functions. Taken together, the findings suggest that the common core developmental program of gene expression which occurs in multiple organs during juvenile life is associated with a common core developmental program of histone methylation. In particular, declining H3K4me3 is strongly associated with gene downregulation and occurs in the promoter regions of many growth-regulating genes, suggesting that this change in histone methylation may contribute to the component of the genetic program that drives juvenile body growth deceleration.
Introduction
Posttranslational modifications of histone protein are thought to be important epigenetic marks closely associated with transcriptional regulation [1]. In particular, methylation of H3K4 is associated with transcriptional activation, and methylation of H3K27 with transcriptional repression [1]–[4]. Both histone methylation marks are proposed to be instrumental in gene regulation during mammalian development [4]–[6]. For example, in mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs), genes involved in the maintenance of pluripotency like Sox2 are actively transcribed, and its promoter is marked strongly by trimethylation of H3K4 (H3K4me3) [7]. When ESCs lose pluripotency and differentiate into mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), Sox2 becomes downregulated and H3K4me3 at the Sox2 promoter is replaced by trimethylation of H3K27 (H3K27me3) [7]. Interestingly, many key developmental transcription factors with complex expression patterns are bivalently marked with both H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 in ESCs. The combination of “activation” and “repression” histone mark is usually associated with temporary silencing of the gene locus, with the gene remaining “poised” for expression once the repressive H3K27me3 mark is removed [7]–[9].
Widespread temporal changes in gene expression are not restricted to the differentiation of ESCs and embryogenesis; during early postnatal life, extensive changes in gene expression occur in most major organs. Some of these changes are organ-specific, but other shifts in gene expression occur simultaneously in multiple organs. In rodents, hundreds of growth-promoting genes are downregulated from 1- to 4-wks of age simultaneously in liver, kidney, lung, and heart. There is evidence that this multi-organ genetic program helps drive the widespread decline in cell proliferation that occurs in juvenile life, as organs approach adult size [10], [11].
We previously showed that, in a number of these growth-promoting genes, mRNA downregulation is associated with declining promoter H3K4me3 [10], suggesting a possible causal relationship. However, the genome-wide epigenetic changes during this dynamic period of early postnatal life remain largely unknown. In the current study, we combined chromatin immunoprecipitation and promoter tiling array (ChIP-on-chip) to investigate, the temporal changes of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 at promoter regions across the genome from 1- to 4-wks of age in mouse kidney and lung in vivo. Gene ontology analyses were then used to explore the biological functions associated with these epigenetic changes. In addition, we combined the histone methylation analysis with our previous expression microarray analysis performed in the same organs and ages [11] to study the correlations between these epigenetic changes and regulation of gene expression.
Materials and Methods
Animal Procedures
All animal procedures were approved by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Animal Care and Use Committee. C57BL/6 male mice at 1- and 4-wk of age were purchased from Charles River and sacrificed to obtain kidney and lung tissue.
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP)
Cell nuclei from animal tissues were isolated as previously described [12]. Briefly, kidney and lung (50–150 mg) of C57BL/6 mice at 1 and 4 wk of age were homogenized with a Blaessig glass homogenizer on ice and then crosslinked with 1% formaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature. Pellets of cell nuclei were resuspended in SDS lysis buffer (350 µl per pellet from 50 mg of tissue) from a commercial kit (Upstate ChIP Assay Kit, Millipore, Billerica, MA) and chromatin was fragmented to approximately 500 bp by sonicating on ice for 14 cycles (10 seconds on/20 seconds off, output level 2.0) using Misonix sonicator 3000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). 100 ng of DNA was then used for each chromatin immunoprecipitation using a ChIP Assay Kit (Millipore, Catalog number 17–295) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Rabbit polyclonal antibody against trimethyl-H3K27 (Millipore, catalog number 07–449) or trimethyl-H3K4 (Abcam Inc, catalog number ab8580) was used for immunoprecipitation. After chromatin immunoprecipitation, the chromatin crosslinking was reversed and DNA was recovered by phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. The DNA samples were reconstituted in deionized H2O. For each corresponding sample, a portion of chromatin was analyzed without chromatin immunoprecipitation (Input) to represent the unselected DNA content.
Sequential ChIP (ChIP-reChIP)
To confirm bivalency of histone marks H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 on the same promoter, we performed sequential ChIP, using essentially the same methods as individual ChIP. Importantly, the elution after the first ChIP was performed by incubating the Protein A agarose in TE buffer with 10 mM DTT at 37°C for 30 mins, followed by a 20-fold dilution in ChIP dilution buffer (Millipore, Catalog number 20–153) [13].
ChIP-quantitative Real-time PCR (ChIP-qPCR)
Before hybridization, the quality of the immunoprecipitated DNA was tested by real-time PCR using custom primers that amplify promoter regions previously known to show presence or absence of histone modifications being studied [10] (Fig. S1). Primer sequences are provided in Table S1 in File S1. We also performed ChIP-qPCR validation for genes that showed changes (increases or decreases) in H3K4me3 or H3K27me3 with age, genes that showed bivalent histone modifications and genes that showed concordant declines in H3K4me3 with age. Primer sequences for these three different sets of genes are provided in Table S2, S3, and S4 in File S1. The amount of histone modification at a particular position was quantified with a standard curve generated by serially diluted mouse genomic DNA. Chromatin enrichment was expressed as percent input = 100×(amount of target DNA by real-time PCR after ChIP/amount of target DNA by real-time PCR in input)/(volume of DNA solution used for ChIP/volume of DNA solution set aside as input).
Promoter Tiling Array
DNA recovered from chromatin immunoprecipitation was amplified as previously described [14], purified, fragmented, labeled, and hybridized to Affymetrix Gene Chip Promoter 1.0R tiling array using the Affymetrix stardard ChIP-on-chip protocol. Raw data were deposited in the GEO database (accession number: GSE49785). Kidney or lung DNA from 1- or 4-wk old mice (n = 4 animals per age group) were used for chromatin immunoprecipitation using either antibodies to H3K4me3 or to H3K27me3, or IgG for input. Each microarray chip was hybridized to labeled DNA derived from a single animal.
Bioinformatics and Statistical Analysis
Microarray signals were analyzed using the default Affymetrix RMA algorithm for tiling array. ANOVA was performed and false discovery rate (FDR) reports were generated using Partek Genome Suite 6.6 (Partek, St. Charles, MO). The Model-based Analysis of Tiling-arrays (MAT) algorithm was used to detect promoter regions enriched by immunoprecipitation with antibody against H3K4me3 or H3K27me3 [15] compared to input, using a FDR cut-off of 0.01, mean chromatin fragment size of 600 bases, and promoter definition of minus two thousand bases to plus five hundred bases of transcription start sites, based on mouse genome build 36. Venn diagrams were generated by Partek Genome Suite. Comparison of microarray signals between genes marked with H3K4me3, H3K27me3, both (bivalent), or neither (unmarked) was performed by ANOVA on Ranks. Gene ontology analysis was performed by DAVID bioinformatic resource 6.7 [16], [17]. Correlation analyses (Spearman’s Rank Correlation) and chi-square tests were performed by SigmaPlot 11.0 (Systat Software, San Jose, CA). Comparison of mRNA expression and histone H3K4me3 with age using real-time PCR was performed by one-way-ANOVA. For ChIP-reChIP, two-way-ANOVA was used with two independent variables: genomic position, and the antibody used in the reChIP (H3K27me3 versus IgG). Known and predicted protein-protein interactions were analyzed by STRING9.0 (string-db.org).
Defining Temporal changes in Histone Modifications from 1- to 4-wk
We combined the tiling microarray data for the two age groups to compare the histone modifications between 1- and 4-wk of age in the same organ. We considered genes that showed significant H3K4me3 signals at 1-wk (versus Input DNA) but not at 4-wk to have “lost” H3K4me3 with age. On the contrary, genes that showed significant H3K4me3 signals only at 4-wk old were considered to have “acquired” the mark with age. For genes with significant histone methylation at both 1- and 4-wk compared to input DNA, the quantitative level of that histone methylation may have changed substantially with age, which might lead to altered gene expression. To detect these quantitative temporal changes in histone methylation, all genes in the microarray that showed histone signal at both 1- and 4-wk were ranked by the change in MAT score [15] with age for a particular histone mark, and then divided into three groups: lower quartile (0–25th), middle quartiles (25th–75th), and upper quartile (75th–100th). The lower quartile consisted of genes that showed decreasing MAT score, which represents decreasing histone methylation with age. On the contrary, the upper quartile consisted of genes that showed increasing MAT score and therefore increasing histone methylation with age. The middle quartiles comprised genes that showed little change in histone methylation with age. This approach of categorizing genes into three groups (decreased, increased, and unchanged) was used because there is currently no clear understanding about what cut-off value for change in MAT score should be used identify biologically meaningful changes in histone methylation [15].
Quantitative Real-time PCR
Real-time PCR was used to assess specific mRNA levels in mouse kidney and lung. Organs were dissected from 1- and 4-wk old C57BL/6 mice (n = 5 animals per time point). Total RNA (100–200 ng) was reverse transcribed using SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed for 18S, Aurkb, Ccnd2, Sox11, Rrm2, and Zwilch using commercially available FAM or VIC-labeled Taqman assays (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Reactions were performed in triplicate on cDNA derived from each animal using the ABI prism 7900 Sequence Detection System instrument (Applied Biosystems). The relative quantity of each mRNA was calculated using the formula: Relative Expression = 2–ΔCt×106, where Ct represents the threshold cycle and ΔCt = (Ct of gene of interest)–(Ct of 18S rRNA). Values were multiplied by 106 for convenience of comparison.
Results
H3K4me3 is Associated with Higher Expression and H3K27me3 is Associated with Lower Expression Levels
We performed chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) with genomic DNA isolated from normal mouse kidney and lung at 1- and 4-wk of age using antibodies that recognize specific histone modifications H3K4me3 or H3K27me3. The ChIP-enriched DNA and total genomic DNA (Input) were hybridized to tiling microarrays that interrogate over 25,500 mouse promoters (Affymetrix Gene Chip Promoter 1.0R). Promoter regions with histone binding was identified by significant enrichment in the immunoprecipitated DNA compared to the Input DNA (ANOVA, FDR<0.01). Since we were primarily interested in the correlation between histone modifications and gene expression, we combined the promoter analysis with our previous expression microarray [11] (1- and 4-wk old C57BL/6 mice, kidney and lung, n = 5 in each group), and all subsequent analysis presented in this study focused on the 21,679 genes for which we had both promoter histone modification and gene expression levels.
Tiling array analysis of 1-wk old kidney and lung suggested that the distribution of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 marks across the genome is very similar between the two organs ( Fig. 1A ). About half of all promoters did not show a significant H3K4me3 or H3K27me3 mark, 35–40% of all promoters were H3K4me3 positive, 10–13% were H3K27me3 positive, and about 2% were positive for both marks. In a subset of genes that showed both histone marks, we confirmed bivalency using ChIP-reChIP (Fig. S2).
Expression analysis of genes associated with these promoters suggested that H3K4me3 is generally associated with higher levels of expression ( Fig. 1B ). For example in 1-wk old kidney, genes marked with H3K4me3 showed a significantly higher average level of expression than genes unmarked (8.88 versus 6.43, P<0.05, ANOVA on ranks). H3K27 marked genes showed a modest, yet statistically significant association with lower expression levels compared to unmarked (6.36 versus 6.43, P<0.05). Genes marked by both H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 showed an elevated level of expression compared to unmarked genes (8.00 versus 6.43, P<0.05), which agreed with the observation that H3K4me3 has a stronger association with gene expression than H3K27me3. Similarly, when we divide the genes into groups with different expression levels ( Fig. 1C ), genes with the lowest expression (microarray signal <3) were predominantly negative for both H3K4me3 and H3K27me3, or only H3K27me3 positive. In groups with progressively higher expression levels, the proportion of genes with negative for both marks or positive only for H3K27me3 decreased, and genes with H3K4me3 or bivalent marks progressively increased. In the group with the highest level of expression (microarray signal >11), the large majority of genes were H3K4me3 positive ( Fig. 1C ), supporting the idea that H3K4me3 is associated with active transcription.
Bivalently Marked Genes are Enriched for General Developmental Functions
We used the DAVID 2008 web-server [16] to detect enriched gene ontology (GO) terms for genes marked with different histone methylation marks. In 1wk old kidney and lung, genes with bivalent marks were significantly enriched for developmental functions (Table S5–6 in File S1). For example, the three most significant biological functions in genes with bivalent marks in 1-wk old kidney were tube development (GO:0035295, FDR = 1.89e−13), urogenital system development (GO:0001655, FDR = 9.53e−11), and kidney development (GO:0001822, FDR = 1.17e−8). Similarly, in 1-wk old lung, epithelium development (GO:0060429, FDR = 7.67e−11), lung development (GO:0030324, FDR = 8.40e−10) and respiratory tube development (GO:0030323, FDR = 1.25e−9) ranked among the most significant GO terms.
H3K4me3 Marked Genes are Enriched for Cell Cycle Function
Gene ontology analysis also indicated that H3K4me3-positive genes at 1-wk of age showed a wide range of biological functions, which were generally similar between kidney and lung (Table S7–8 in File S1). Some of the major categories that showed the strongest enrichment included protein localization/transportation (GO:0045184, GO:0008104, GO:0015031, GO:0046907) and catabolic processes (GO:0009057, GO:0044265, GO:0030163). Interestingly, cell division functions contributed to more than 10 of the 50 most significant GO terms, perhaps reflecting the active transcription of cell cycle-related genes during this juvenile period, when the organs are rapidly growing and many cells are still undergoing active proliferation.
H3K27me3 Marked Genes are Enriched for Neuronal Differentiation and Development
Similar to H3K4me3, H3K27me3 positive genes are implicated in a variety of biological functions, among which neuron differentiation constitute an overwhelming proportion (Table S9–10 in File S1). The expression of these genes is important for neurodevelopment, and therefore should presumably be actively transcribed in neuronal cells, but remain silenced in other cell types. It is therefore not surprising that in kidney and lung, H3K27me3 mark is present at the promoter regions for silencing of these genes.
Gene Ontology Analysis of Histone Methylation Patterns at 4wk of Age Implicates Functions Similar to those at 1 wk
We next analyzed the tiling promoter microarray for kidney and lung at 4 wk of age. The overall distribution of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 marks across the genome at 4 wk of age (Fig. S3, left panel) was similar to that observed at 1-wk of age. As at 1 week, H3K4me3 at 4 weeks of age was associated with higher levels of expression and H3K27me3 was associated with lower levels of expression (Fig. S3, middle and right panel). Gene ontology analyses of genes marked with H3K4me3 and/or H3K27me3 at 4-wk of age yielded results (Table S11–16 in File S1) similar to those of 1-wk old mice, except that in the 4-wk old kidney, bivalent genes were not strongly implicated in developmental functions, but rather involved in tissue homeostasis (Table S9 in File S1).
Temporal changes in Histone Modifications from 1- to 4-wk Kidney and Lung
To gain insight into how changes in histone modifications regulate biological functions from 1- to 4-wk, we combined the tiling microarray data for the two age groups and focused on genes that showed changes in histone methylation with age. As described in the materials and methods section and summarized in Fig. 2 , genes that showed significant histone mark only at 1- or only at 4-wk were considered to have “lost” or “acquired” the mark with age, respectively. Based on this definition, the vast majority of genes retained their histone marks with age ( Table 1 ), except for bivalent genes, of which only 50–60% remained bivalent from 1- to 4-wk. We also categorized all genes that had significant histone methylation at both 1- and 4-wk based on their change in MAT score [15] with age for a particular histone mark into three groups: lower quartile (0–25th), middle quartiles (25th–75th), and upper quartile (75th–100th). The lower quartile consisted of genes that showed decreasing MAT score and therefore decreasing histone methylation with age, while the upper quartile consisted of genes with increasing MAT score and increasing histone methylation with age. The middle quartiles comprised genes that showed little change in histone methylation with age (Fig. S4). We used ChIP-qPCR in a subset of genes to confirm the validity of our approach for identifying changes in histone modifications from 1- to 4-wk organs (Fig. S5).
Table 1. Genome wide changes of histone H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 marks from 1 to 4 wk kidney and lung.
Histone Marks at 4 wk | ||||||||||
Kidney | H3K4me3 | H3K27me3 | Bivalent | Negative for both | Total | |||||
Histone Marks at 1 wk | H3K4me3 | 7759 | 49 | 84 | 228 | 8120 | ||||
H3K27me3 | 65 | 2109 | 89 | 193 | 2399 | |||||
Bivalent | 190 | 131 | 303 | 8 | 632 | |||||
Negative for both | 677 | 437 | 14 | 9400 | 10528 | |||||
Histone Marks at 4 wk | ||||||||||
Lung | H3K4me3 | H3K27me3 | Bivalent | Negative for both | Total | |||||
Histone Marks at 1 wk | H3K4me3 | 6995 | 61 | 155 | 696 | 7907 | ||||
H3K27me3 | 10 | 2203 | 57 | 108 | 2378 | |||||
Bivalent | 66 | 158 | 376 | 12 | 612 | |||||
Negative for both | 241 | 467 | 14 | 10060 | 10782 |
Genes were categorized by their histone marks at 1- and 4-wk of age. The vast majority of genes retained their histone marks with age except for bivalent genes, of which only 50–60% remained bivalent from 1-wk to 4-wk.
Temporal changes in Histone Methylation during Early Postnatal Life are Associated with changes in Gene Expression
We next compared the temporal changes in histone methylation with the temporal changes in gene expression from 1 to 4 wk of age. Changes in gene expression from 1 to 4-wk were positively correlated with changes in H3K4me3 (Fig. S6, Spearman’s p = 0.137, kidney; p = 0.111, lung; both P<2e-08) and negatively correlated with changes in H3K27me3 (p = −0.060, kidney; p = −0.041, lung; both P<2e-08). In a similar analysis, the set of age-downregulated genes (≥2-fold, FDR<0.05) was significantly enriched with genes showing loss of or decrease in H3K4me3, and with genes showing acquisition of or increase in H3K27me3 ( Table 2 , 3 , P<0.001 in both kidney and lung, Pearson’s chi-square test). Conversely, the set of age-upregulated genes (≥2-fold, FDR<0.05) was significantly enriched with genes showing acquisition of or increase in H3K4me3, and with genes showing loss of or decrease in H3K27me3 ( Table 2 , 3 , P<0.001 in both organs).
Table 2. Temporal changes of H3K4me3 is associated with changes of gene expression in kidney and lung.
No. of genes | ||||
Kidney | Lost/decreasedH3K4me3 | H3K4me3unchanged | Acquired/increasedH3K4me3 | Chi-square P-value |
Whole Genome | 2500 (26.0%) | 4168 (43.4%) | 2929 (30.5%) | |
Age-downregulated (≥2-fold, FDR<5%) | 381 (50.8%) | 278 (37.1%) | 91 (12.1%) | P<0.001 |
Age-upregulated (≥2-fold, FDR<5%) | 86 (11.8%) | 216 (29.5%) | 429 (58.7%) | P<0.001 |
Expression not significantly changed | 2033 (25.0%) | 3674 (45.3%) | 2409 (29.7%) | P = 0.047 |
No. of genes | ||||
Lung | Lost/decreased H3K4me3 | H3K4me3 unchanged | Acquired/increased H3K4me3 | Chi-square P-value |
Whole Genome | 2825 (32.0%) | 3796 (42.9%) | 2220 (25.1%) | |
Age-downregulated (≥2-fold, FDR<5%) | 314 (57.0%) | 177 (32.1%) | 60 (10.9%) | P<0.001 |
Age-upregulated (≥2-fold, FDR<5%) | 88 (17.9%) | 164 (33.3%) | 240 (48.8%) | P<0.001 |
Expression not significantly changed | 2423 (31.1%) | 3455 (44.3%) | 1920 (24.6%) | P = 0.202 |
Genes were categorized by changes in gene expression with age (rows) and changes in histone H3K4me3 with age (columns). In both kidney and lung, age-downregulated genes (≥2-fold, FDR<0.05) were significantly enriched with genes showing loss of or decrease in H3K4me3, Conversely, the set of age-upregulated genes (≥2-fold, FDR<0.05) was significantly enriched with genes showing acquisition of or increase in H3K4me3.
Table 3. Temporal changes of H3K27me3 is associated with changes of gene expression in kidney and lung.
No. of genes | ||||
Kidney | Lost/decreasedH3K27me3 | H3K27me3unchanged | Acquired/increasedH3K27me3 | Chi-square P-value |
Whole Genome | 1100 (30.4%) | 1287 (35.6%) | 1228 (34.0%) | |
Age-downregulated (≥2-fold, FDR<5%) | 65 (18.3%) | 127 (35.7%) | 164 (46.1%) | P<0.001 |
Age-upregulated (≥2-fold, FDR<5%) | 117 (57.1%) | 58 (28.3%) | 30 (14.6%) | P<0.001 |
Expression not significantly changed | 918 (30.1%) | 1102 (36.1%) | 1034 (33.9%) | P = 0.910 |
No. of genes | ||||
Lung | Lost/decreased H3K27me3 | H3K27me3 unchanged | Acquired/increased H3K27me3 | Chi-square P-value |
Whole Genome | 895 (24.3%) | 1397 (37.9%) | 1395 (37.8%) | |
Age-downregulated (≥2-fold, FDR<5%) | 38 (13.7%) | 87 (31.4%) | 152 (54.9%) | P<0.001 |
Age-upregulated (≥2-fold, FDR<5%) | 94 (34.3%) | 96 (35.0%) | 84 (30.7%) | P<0.001 |
Expression not significantly changed | 763 (24.3%) | 1214 (38.7%) | 1159 (37.0%) | P = 0.723 |
Genes were categorized by changes in gene expression with age (rows) and changes in histone H3K27me3 with age (columns). In both kidney and lung, age-downregulated genes (≥2-fold, FDR<0.05) was significantly enriched with genes showing acquisition of or increase in H3K27me3. Conversely, the set of age-upregulated genes (≥2-fold, FDR<0.05) was significantly enriched with genes showing loss of or decrease in H3K27me3.
Gene Ontology Analyses of Genes that showed Temporal changes in Histone Methylation
Gene ontology analysis ( Fig. 3 ) suggested that cell division and cell cycle-related functions were strongly enriched in the genes that showed loss of or decrease in H3K4me3 marks with age, in both kidney and lung (Table S17–18 in File S1). For genes that acquired or showed increased H3K4me3 with age, major implicated biological functions included protein localization/transport (both organs) and catabolism and apoptosis (in kidney) (Table S19–20 in File S1). Genes that lost or showed decreasing H3K27me3 with age in both kidney and lung were predominantly implicated in morphogenesis and developmental functions (Table S21–22 in File S1). Genes that acquired or showed increasing H3K27me3 with age in kidney and lung were also enriched with developmental functions, along with ion transportation and cell motion/migration (Table S23–24 in File S1).
Concordant changes in Histone Methylation with Age between Kidney and Lung
We next analyzed the overlap in histone methylation changes with age between different organs. We found that the number of genes that showed concordant changes in histone methylation in both kidney and lung was much greater than would be expected by chance if regulation in the two organs were independent events ( Fig. 4A–B, P<0.001, chi-square test). Gene ontology analysis showed that the genes with concordant lost/decreased H3K4me3 with age are strongly implicated in cell division and cell cycle functions ( Fig. 4C ). This is consistent with the gene ontology analysis performed in individual organs, and also with our previous findings that genes concordantly downregulated with age in multiple organs are primarily involved in cell growth and proliferation [10], [11]. The downregulation of mRNA and H3K4me3 with age in a subset of genes was confirmed using real-time PCR and ChIP-qPCR, respectively ( Fig. 5 ) On the other hand, genes with concordant increases in H3K4me3 or concordant changes (increase or decrease) of H3K27me3 did not point strongly to a particular group of biological functions. This finding is supported by a different bioinformatic analysis based on protein-protein interactions (STRING 9.0). Proteins encoded by the genes that showed a concordant decrease in H3K4me3 in both organs formed several clusters of extensive protein-protein interactions ( Fig. 6 ). The biggest cluster consisted of many proteins that are involved in cell cycle functions, including cyclins (Ccna2, Ccnd2), cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdk1, Cdk4, Cdk7, Cks1b) and condensins (Smc2, Ncapd2, Ncaph). The second biggest protein cluster, which consists of multiple ECM proteins (Col1a2, Col3a1, Col5a2) and integrins (Itga6, Itga8, Itgav), involves cell adhesion and cell signaling. In contrast, proteins encoded by genes with concordant increases in H3K4me3 or concordant changes (increases or decreases) in H3K27me3 only showed sporadic interactions, rather than forming an extensive network (Fig. S7). Taken together, these analyses suggest that the concordant downregulation of H3K4me3 in cell-cycle genes may be implicated in the decline of cell proliferation with age in multiple organs during early postnatal life.
Discussion
Broad shifts in gene expression have been identified during differentiation of specific isolated cell types and during embryogenesis [18]–[21]. Far less, however, is known about the changes in gene expression that occur during postnatal development. We recently demonstrated in mice and rats that, during juvenile life, extensive temporal changes in gene expression occur in most major organs [10], [11]. Interestingly these postnatal developmental shifts in gene expression are strikingly similar in different organs, indicating the existence of a common core developmental genetic program that occurs during early postnatal life. This program includes hundreds of growth-promoting genes that are downregulated from 1- to 4-wks of age simultaneously in liver, kidney, lung, and heart, and there is evidence that this component of the program helps drive the widespread decline in cell proliferation that occurs in juvenile life, as organs approach adult size [10], [11]. The molecular mechanisms that orchestrate these extensive changes in gene expression occurring in multiple postnatal organs are not known. Here we found that this multi-organ juvenile genetic program is associated with global shifts in histone methylation.
To explore postnatal changes in histone methylation patterns, we assessed the patterns of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 at promoter regions across the genome in kidney and lung of 1- and 4-wk-old mice and compared these genome-wide patterns of histone methylation to genome-wide patterns of gene expression. We found that, in both organs and at both ages, the histone mark H3K4me3 was associated with high levels of gene expression, and H3K27me3 was associated with low levels of expression. These associations are similar to associations identified in other biological systems, including human embryonic stem cells differentiation [22]–[24], erythroid cells development [8], thyroid hormone (T3)-dependent metamorphosis [25], and dendritic cells activation [26]. Our findings suggest that this general concept – that H3K4me3 is associated with active transcription and H3K27me3 is associated with gene silencing – applies also to postnatal tissues in vivo. Similarly, we found that temporal changes in histone methylation in juvenile animals were associated with temporal changes in gene expression. In both mouse kidney and lung, from 1- to 4-wks of age, loss of H3K4me3 and acquisition of H3K27me3 were strongly associated with downregulation of gene expression, and conversely, acquisition of H3K4me3 and loss of H3K27me3 were associated with upregulation of gene expression. Although these strong temporal associations are consistent with the hypothesis that histone methylation helps coordinate the widespread changes in gene expression occurring during early postnatal life, the actual causal relationship between histone methylation marks and gene expression remain unclear, not only in this setting but in general [26]–[29]. The observed changes in histone H3K4 and H3K27 methylation could arise from a variety of possible mechanisms. The level of methylation depends on the opposing activities of histone methyltransferases, (such as Set1/MLL complexes for H3K4 and EZH1/2 for H3K27) and histone demethylases (such as KDM family members) [30]. In addition, chromatin remodelers can affect histone methylation levels, for example, by nucleosome ejection [31].
Interestingly, the genome-wide pattern of H3K4 and H3K27 trimethylation showed strong similarity in kidney and lung, at both ages studied. Furthermore, the shifts in both K4 and K27 methylation patterns between 1- and 4-wks of age showed marked similarity in the two organs studied, suggesting that there might be a common core developmental program of histone methylation occurring simultaneously in multiple organs, which accompanies the common core developmental program of gene expression that occurs in multiple organs. Studies of additional organs are needed to determine how widespread this histone methylation program is among other tissues.
Gene ontology analysis was used to explore the possibility that specific changes in histone methylation might be associated with discrete biological functions. An interesting pattern was observed for the genes marked with both H3K4me3 and H3K27me3. At 1-wk of age, this apparent bivalent histone mark was strongly enriched for genes with developmental functions, which is consistent with previous reports showing that many key developmental genes are bivalently marked in embryonic stem cells [7], [9]. At 4-wks of age, this apparent bivalent mark was predominantly found in genes involved in tissue homeostasis, suggesting that, as postnatal development reaches completion in the adult, the bivalent mark shifts from genes actively expressed for developmental functions to genes actively expressed for tissue maintenance functions. The presence of both marks does not prove that individual promoters are associated with both histone modifications, but could arise from the fact that we studied whole organs which comprise multiple cells types. Thus, a promoter region might be associated with H3K4me3 in some cell types but with H3K27me3 in other cell types. We therefore confirmed bivalency in a subset of genes with both histone marks using ChIP-reChIP (Fig. S2). Other genes that were not evaluated by ChIP-reChIP may not be truly bivalent.
Our findings also point to the potential involvement of H3K4me3 in the regulation of cell proliferation. Gene ontology analyses of genes marked with H3K4me3 were enriched for cell-cycle-related functions in both 1- and 4-wk-old kidney and lung. Similarly, in both kidney and lung, genes that showed decreasing H3K4me3 marks from 1- to 4-wk were strongly enriched for cell division and cell cycle-related functions. Furthermore, when the analysis was focused on genes that showed concordant changes in histone methylation in both kidney and lung, those genes with declining H3K4me3 in both organs were particularly enriched for cell division and cell cycle-related functions. Thus, the findings suggest that, during this early postnatal period, decreasing H3K4me3 is associated with downregulation of genes involved in cell-cycle functions. Because the downregulation of growth-regulating genes appears to be involved in the physiological postnatal slowing of body growth, the combined evidence suggests declining H3K4me3 is also involved in postnatal growth deceleration.
In summary, our combined ChIP-on-chip and expression array analysis in the mouse suggests that extensive genome-wide shifts in H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 are occurring during early postnatal life, and that these changes in histone methylation are strongly associated with genome-wide changes in gene expression occurring concordantly in multiple organs. First, in postnatal tissues, we observed a strong association between histone methylation marks and gene expression and also an association between temporal changes in histone methylation marks and changes in gene expression during juvenile life. Second, we found substantial similarities between histone methylation patterns in two different organs and similarities between temporal changes in histone methylation in these organs, raising the possibility that there may exist a common developmental program of histone methylation occurring simultaneously in multiple organs. Third, using gene ontology analysis, we found that shifts in specific histone methylation marks were associated with specific developmental functions. Of particular interest, genes showing declining H3K4me3 were strongly enriched for functions related to cell proliferation.
Taken together, the findings indicate that the common core developmental program of gene expression which occurs in multiple organs during juvenile life is associated with a common core developmental program of histone methylation. The findings also suggest that one component of this program, declining H3K4me3, is associated with the declining expression of multiple growth-regulating genes. Prior evidence suggests that this declining expression contributes to the physiological slowing of proliferation that occurs in multiple tissues during juvenile life. Therefore, the current findings suggest that declining H3K4me3 may contribute to the developmental program that limits somatic growth in mammals.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Hoi-Hung Cheung from the Section on Clinical and Developmental Genomics, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), for providing the protocol for amplification of chromatin immunoprecipitated DNA prior to microarray hybridization.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), NIH. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Barski A, Cuddapah S, Cui K, Roh TY, Schones DE, et al. (2007) High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell 129: 823–837 S0092-8674(07)00600-9 [pii]; 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.009 [doi] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Hon GC, Hawkins RD, Ren B (2009) Predictive chromatin signatures in the mammalian genome. Hum Mol Genet 18: R195–R201 ddp409 [pii]; 10.1093/hmg/ddp409 [doi] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Guenther MG, Levine SS, Boyer LA, Jaenisch R, Young RA (2007) A chromatin landmark and transcription initiation at most promoters in human cells. Cell 130: 77–88 S0092-8674(07)00681-2 [pii]; 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.042 [doi] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Bhaumik SR, Smith E, Shilatifard A (2007) Covalent modifications of histones during development and disease pathogenesis. Nat Struct Mol Biol 14: 1008–1016 nsmb1337 [pii]; 10.1038/nsmb1337 [doi] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Cheung I, Shulha HP, Jiang Y, Matevossian A, Wang J, et al. (2010) Developmental regulation and individual differences of neuronal H3K4me3 epigenomes in the prefrontal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 8824–8829 1001702107 [pii]; 10.1073/pnas.1001702107 [doi] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Herlofsen SR, Bryne JC, Hoiby T, Wang L, Issner R, et al. (2013) Genome-wide map of quantified epigenetic changes during in vitro chondrogenic differentiation of primary human mesenchymal stem cells. BMC Genomics 14: 105 1471-2164-14-105 [pii]; 10.1186/1471-2164-14-105 [doi] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Mikkelsen TS, Ku M, Jaffe DB, Issac B, Lieberman E, et al. (2007) Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells. Nature 448: 553–560 nature06008 [pii]; 10.1038/nature06008 [doi] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Orford K, Kharchenko P, Lai W, Dao MC, Worhunsky DJ, et al. (2008) Differential H3K4 methylation identifies developmentally poised hematopoietic genes. Dev Cell 14: 798–809 S1534-5807(08)00165-2 [pii]; 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.04.002 [doi] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Bernstein BE, Mikkelsen TS, Xie X, Kamal M, Huebert DJ, et al. (2006) A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell 125: 315–326 S0092-8674(06)00380-1 [pii]; 10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.041 [doi] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Lui JC, Forcinito P, Chang M, Chen W, Barnes KM, et al. (2010) Coordinated postnatal down-regulation of multiple growth-promoting genes: evidence for a genetic program limiting organ growth. FASEB J 24: 3083–3092 fj.09-152835 [pii]; 10.1096/fj.09-152835 [doi] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Finkielstain GP, Forcinito P, Lui JC, Barnes KM, Marino R, et al. (2009) An extensive genetic program occurring during postnatal growth in multiple tissues. Endocrinology 150: 1791–1800 en.2008-0868 [pii]; 10.1210/en.2008-0868 [doi] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Yao M, Stenzel-Poore M, Denver RJ (2007) Structural and functional conservation of vertebrate corticotropin-releasing factor genes: evidence for a critical role for a conserved cyclic AMP response element. Endocrinology 148: 2518–2531 en.2006-1413 [pii]; 10.1210/en.2006-1413 [doi] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Furlan-Magaril M, Rincon-Arano H, Recillas-Targa F (2009) Sequential chromatin immunoprecipitation protocol: ChIP-reChIP. Methods Mol Biol 543: 253–266 10.1007/978-1-60327-015-1-17 [doi] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Cheung HH, Lee TL, Davis AJ, Taft DH, Rennert OM, et al. (2010) Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling reveals novel epigenetically regulated genes and non-coding RNAs in human testicular cancer. Br J Cancer 102: 419–427 6605505 [pii]; 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605505 [doi] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Johnson WE, Li W, Meyer CA, Gottardo R, Carroll JS, et al. (2006) Model-based analysis of tiling-arrays for ChIP-chip. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 12457–12462 0601180103 [pii]; 10.1073/pnas.0601180103 [doi] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Huang dW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA (2009) Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res 37: 1–13 gkn923 [pii]; 10.1093/nar/gkn923 [doi] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Huang dW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA (2009) Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 4: 44–57 nprot.2008.211 [pii]; 10.1038/nprot.2008.211 [doi] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Hartl D, Irmler M, Romer I, Mader MT, Mao L, et al. (2008) Transcriptome and proteome analysis of early embryonic mouse brain development. Proteomics 8: 1257–1265 10.1002/pmic.200700724 [doi] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ahn JI, Lee KH, Shin DM, Shim JW, Lee JS, et al.. (2004) Comprehensive transcriptome analysis of differentiation of embryonic stem cells into midbrain and hindbrain neurons. Dev Biol 265: 491–501. S0012160603006080 [pii]. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 20. Cameron TL, Belluoccio D, Farlie PG, Brachvogel B, Bateman JF (2009) Global comparative transcriptome analysis of cartilage formation in vivo. BMC Dev Biol 9: 20 1471-213X-9-20 [pii]; 10.1186/1471-213X-9-20 [doi] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Mansergh FC, Daly CS, Hurley AL, Wride MA, Hunter SM, et al. (2009) Gene expression profiles during early differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells. BMC Dev Biol 9: 5 1471-213X-9-5 [pii]; 10.1186/1471-213X-9-5 [doi] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Pan G, Tian S, Nie J, Yang C, Ruotti V, et al. (2007) Whole-genome analysis of histone H3 lysine 4 and lysine 27 methylation in human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 1: 299–312 S1934-5909(07)00122-1 [pii]; 10.1016/j.stem.2007.08.003 [doi] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Xie W, Schultz MD, Lister R, Hou Z, Rajagopal N, et al.. (2013) Epigenomic Analysis of Multilineage Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells. Cell. S0092-8674(13)00464-9 [pii];10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.022 [doi]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 24.Gifford CA, Ziller MJ, Gu H, Trapnell C, Donaghey J, et al.. (2013) Transcriptional and Epigenetic Dynamics during Specification of Human Embryonic Stem Cells. Cell. S0092-8674(13)00513-8 [pii];10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.037 [doi]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 25. Bilesimo P, Jolivet P, Alfama G, Buisine N, Le MS, et al. (2011) Specific histone lysine 4 methylation patterns define TR-binding capacity and differentiate direct T3 responses. Mol Endocrinol 25: 225–237 me.2010-0269 [pii]; 10.1210/me.2010-0269 [doi] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Huang Y, Min S, Lui Y, Sun J, Su X, et al. (2012) Global mapping of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 reveals chromatin state-based regulation of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells in different environments. Genes Immun 13: 311–320 gene201187 [pii]; 10.1038/gene.2011.87 [doi] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Li B, Carey M, Workman JL (2007) The role of chromatin during transcription. Cell 128: 707–719 S0092-8674(07)00109-2 [pii]; 10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.015 [doi] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Okitsu CY, Hsieh JC, Hsieh CL (2010) Transcriptional activity affects the H3K4me3 level and distribution in the coding region. Mol Cell Biol 30: 2933–2946 MCB.01478-09 [pii]; 10.1128/MCB.01478-09 [doi] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Yu H, Zhu S, Zhou B, Xue H, Han JD (2008) Inferring causal relationships among different histone modifications and gene expression. Genome Res 18: 1314–1324 gr.073080.107 [pii]; 10.1101/gr.073080.107 [doi] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Greer EL, Shi Y (2012) Histone methylation: a dynamic mark in health, disease and inheritance. Nat Rev Genet 13: 343–357 nrg3173 [pii]; 10.1038/nrg3173 [doi] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Cairns BR (2007) Chromatin remodeling: insights and intrigue from single-molecule studies. Nat Struct Mol Biol 14: 989–996 nsmb1333 [pii]; 10.1038/nsmb1333 [doi] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.