Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 30.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Neurol. 2009 Nov 12;17(3):483–486. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02847.x

Association of the MAPT locus with Parkinson’s disease

C Wider a, C Vilariño-Güell a, B Jasinska-Myga a,b, M G Heckman c, A I Soto-Ortolaza a, S A Cobb a, J O Aasly d, J M Gibson e, T Lynch f, R J Uitti g, Z K Wszolek g, M J Farrer a, O A Ross a
PMCID: PMC3906622  NIHMSID: NIHMS547683  PMID: 19912324

Abstract

Background and purpose

Whilst an association between the tau gene (MAPT)-containing H1 haplotype and supranuclear gaze palsy (PSP) has long been recognized, the effect of H1 on risk for Parkinson’s disease (PD) has remained more contentious.

Methods

Herein, we examined the association of H1 and PD in three Caucasian PD patient–control series from Ireland, Norway, and the US (combined: n = 2619), by genotyping two H1/H2 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in MAPT (rs1052553) and in the Saitohin gene (rs62063857) and one H1-specific SNP (rs242557).

Results

We identified a significant association between H1/H2 and risk of PD (rs1052553 OR: 1.43, CI: 1.23–1.64; rs62063857 OR: 1.45, CI: 1.27–1.67), but no effect of the H1-specific SNP rs242557 (OR: 0.92, CI: 0.82–1.03).

Conclusions

Our findings show that the H1 haplotype is a significant risk factor for PD. However, one H1-specific SNP (rs242557) previously implicated in PSP did not alter the risk of PD, indicating that distinct H1 sub-haplotypes probably drive the associations with PD and PSP.

Keywords: association studies, genetics, MAPT, Parkinson’s disease

Introduction

Tau and α-synuclein are two abundant brain proteins that aggregate in age-related neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s disease (PD), Alzheimer’s disease, and progressive supranuclear gaze palsy (PSP) [1]. Evidence suggests that the formation of pathological inclusions containing tau and α-synuclein is promoted by common mechanisms [2] and that the interplay of overlapping genetic factors may determine susceptibility to developing disease [35]. Mutations in the tau gene (MAPT) cause frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17, with some patients displaying clinical and pathological features reminiscent of PSP [6,7]. The structurally complex MAPT locus on chromosome 17q21.31 contains a c. 900-kb inversion polymorphism and occurs as two distinct non-recombinant haplotypes H1 (direct orientation) and H2 (inverted) [8,9]. The major MAPT-containing H1 haplotype is associated with increased risk for PSP and other taupathies, as well as PD [1016]. H2 is found in about 20% of Europeans whereas it is rare in Africans and almost absent from Eastern-Asian populations [17]. In contrast to H2, the H1 extended haplotype is evolutionarily dynamic and contains a number of sub-haplotypes composed of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) highly correlated (i.e. in strong linkage disequilibrium – LD) with each other [13].

Over 20 Caucasian populations of patients and controls have been examined for association of MAPT variability and PD, with mostly positive albeit mixed results (available at: http://www.pdgene.org) [3,1416,1822]. Saitohin (STH) is a 1-exon gene located in intron 9 of MAPT, in which a coding variant Q7R (rs62063857) was shown to associate with risk of PSP and PD and to be in complete LD with the MAPT 238-bp intron 9 deletion that discriminates H1/H2 [16,23]. The two other SNPs included in our study were selected because the first one has been associated with PD (H1/H2-tagging SNP rs1052553) and the second one with PSP (H1-specific SNP rs242557) [10,16]. Herein, we investigate three SNPs in MAPT (rs242557 and rs1052553) and STH (Q7R, rs62063857) for association with risk of PD in three populations of patients and controls from Ireland, Norway, and the US (combined: 1218 patients and 1401 controls). A subset of the Norwegian patient–control series was reported elsewhere (296 patients and 441 controls) [14,15].

Subjects and methods

Three series of patients with PD and controls were included from Ireland (360 patients, 437 controls), Norway (480 patients, 555 controls), and the US (378 patients, 409 controls). All patients and controls were White and of European ancestry. All patients were examined and observed longitudinally by a movement disorders neurologist and diagnosed with PD according to published criteria [24]. PD was considered familial when ≥1 first- or second-degree relatives were reportedly affected. Unrelated control individuals were free of personal or familial history suggestive of –parkinsonism. The ethical review board at each institution involved approved the study, and all participants provided informed consent.

Genotyping of the three SNPs (rs242557, rs1052553, and rs62063857) was performed on a Sequenom MassArray iPLEX platform (San Diego, CA, USA) (all primer sequences are available on request) and analyzed with Typer 4.0 software. The rate of genotype calls was ≥96% in each population. Numerical variables were summarized with the sample mean, SD, and range. Associations between PD and each SNP were measured by ORs and 95% CIs obtained from logistic regression models adjusted for age, gender, and series (combined series only). In PD cases, associations between age at onset and each marker were examined using linear regression models adjusted for gender and series (combined series only). In controls, the association between rs1052553 and age was examined using linear regression models adjusted for gender and series (combined series only). Both additive and dominant models were considered for all single marker analyses. Haplotype analysis was performed using SPLUS score tests for association [25], with adjustments made for age and gender; P-values were obtained from the asymptotic distribution of the score statistic and haplotypes of <1% were not considered. LD between markers in study controls was measured by pair-wise r2 values. For each family of statistical tests, multiple testing was adjusted for using single-step minP procedure [26] with 10 000 permutations of case and control labels to determine the level of significance that controls the family-wise error rate at 5%; P-values less than or equal to this level were considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using SPLUS (version 8.0.1; Insightful Corporation, Seattle, WA, USA).

Results

Demographics of the three patient–control series are presented in Table 1. None of the three SNPs departed from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium in control populations. Two SNPs (rs1052553 and rs62063857) were in high LD with each other (r2 ≥ 0.91) but not with rs242557 (r2: 0.12–0.19). In additive models (Table 2) and dominant models (data not shown), both the H1/H2-tagging SNP (rs1052553) and the STH Q7R (rs62063857) displayed significant association with PD in all three series and in the combined series (rs1052553 OR: 1.43, P < 0.001; rs62063857 OR: 1.45, P < 0.001; P ≤ 0.024 considered significant after permutation multiple testing adjustment). For both rs1052553 and rs62063857, the frequency of the major A allele (H1) and A-containing genotype was higher in patients than in controls (allele and genotype frequencies for each SNP are provided in Supplementary Tables S1a–c). SNP rs242557 was not associated with PD in any of the individual series (P ≥ 0.13) or in the combined series (OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.82–1.03, P = 0.16). Haplotype analysis showed the frequency of one haplotype (G-G-G) was lower in patients than in controls (P ≤ 0.018) (Supplementary Table S2). A sub-analysis was performed using only those patients and controls homozygous for the A allele of rs1052553 (H1/H1 homozygotes), which showed no association between rs242557 and PD in any series or in the combined series (all P-values ≥ 0.50 under additive and dominant models, data not shown). None of the three SNPs displayed a significant association with age at disease onset in the combined series under additive or dominant models (P ≥ 0.13, data not shown).

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of the patient–control series

Variable PD cases Controls
Irish series (360 cases, 437 controls)
 Age 66.5 ± 10.0 (36, 91) 65.0 ± 24.3 (22, 103)
 Gender (male) 216 (60%) 158 (36%)
 Age at PD onset 51.8 ± 10.5 (18, 77) NA
 Familial cases 13% NA
US series (378 cases, 409 controls)
 Age 72.7 ± 11.0 (30, 92) 72.2 ± 10.8 (33, 92)
 Gender (male) 215 (57%) 215 (53%)
 Age at PD onset 62.0 ± 12.2 (16, 90) NA
 Familial cases 35% NA
Norwegian series (480 cases, 555 controls)
 Age 72.7 ± 10.8 (45, 99) 70.6 ± 12.5 (43, 106)
 Gender (male) 291 (61%) 311 (56%)
 Age at PD onset 58.9 ± 11.0 (30, 88) NA
 Familial cases 26% NA

The sample mean ± SD (minimum, maximum) is given for age and age of PD onset. Information regarding age at PD onset was unavailable for 107 Irish PD cases (30%) and 10 US PD cases (3%). NA, not applicable; PD, Parkinson’s disease.

Table 2.

Single single nucleotide polymorphisms associations with Parkinson’s disease

Marker Irish series (360 cases, 437 controls)
US series (378 cases, 409 controls)
Norwegian series (480 cases, 555 controls)
Combined series (1218 cases, 1401 controls)
Estimated OR (95% CI) P-value Estimated OR (95% CI) P-value Estimated OR (95% CI) P-value Estimated OR (95% CI) P-value
rs62063857 (A)a 1.54 (1.18–2.00) 0.002 1.35 (1.06–1.72) 0.014 1.49 (1.18–1.89) 0.001 1.45 (1.27–1.67) <0.001
rs1052553 (A)a 1.52 (1.16–1.96) 0.002 1.47 (1.15–1.89) 0.002 1.33 (1.05–1.69) 0.018 1.43 (1.23–1.64) <0.001
rs242557 (G) 0.93 (0.75–1.15) 0.51 0.85 (0.70–1.04) 0.13 0.95 (0.79–1.14) 0.59 0.92 (0.82–1.03) 0.16
a

The A allele corresponds to the H1 haplotype. Estimated odds ratios and P-values result from logistic regression models adjusted for age, gender, and series (combined series only) under an additive model. Estimated odds ratios correspond to an increase of one major allele. Following a single-step minP adjustment for multiple testing, P-values ≤ 0.026 (Irish series), 0.021 (US series), 0.022 (Norwegian series), and 0.024 (combined series) are considered statistically significant.

We performed a pooled analysis of previous studies combined with our own results (23 Caucasian patient–control series; overall n = 7736 patients and 9339 controls), which showed that the H2 allele versus H1 has an estimated overall OR of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.74–0.82).

Discussion

Our data provide strong evidence for an association between the MAPT H1 haplotype and risk of PD in three Caucasian populations from Ireland, Norway, and the US. In accordance with previous studies, the two H1/H2 SNPs rs1052553 and rs62063857 were highly correlated with each other and displayed a robust association with PD but not with age at disease onset [15,21]. Pooled analysis using previous studies combined with our data (overall 17 075 Caucasian patients and controls) showed the H2 haplotype versus H1 has an estimated OR of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.74–0.82). In a previous study by Tobin et al. [16], the association of SNPs rs1052553 and rs62063857 with PD did not reach statistical significance after correction for multiple testing; however, a 2-SNP H1/H2 haplotype including rs1052553 was highly significant, supporting an association. Whilst the H1-specific SNP rs242557 was not individually associated with risk for PD in our study [19], a 3-SNP haplotype (G-G-G) was significantly less frequent amongst patients than controls. The association of the G-G-G haplotype with PD is probably driven by rs1052553 and rs62063857, and not by rs242557. To examine whether the H1-specific SNP rs242557 influences risk for PD only in H1/H1 homozygotes, a sub-analysis was performed, which did not show any significant association. In our previous study of a subset of the Norwegian population, one H1-specific subhaplotype was strongly associated with PD; however, the sub-haplotype did not include rs242557 [15].

Our results show an excess of H1 in patients compared to controls; however, the association may also reflect a protective effect of H2 which is over-represented in controls. A protective effect of H2 has been hypothesized to account for part of the H1/H2 association with PSP [10]. However, one the most robust association reported in PSP was the H1-specific SNP rs242557 [10], which did not associate with risk of PD in our study. This suggests that, although H1/H2 influences risk for both parkinsonian disorders, the mechanisms involved differ between PD and PSP. To examine whether a putative protective effect of H2 may influence age, we performed an exploratory study in control individuals that did not find an association between H2 and age (data not shown). Future studies comparing centenarians to young subjects will be required to establish whether H2 promotes healthy aging.

Whilst most studies including ours have found an association between the H1 haplotype and PD, the functional variant remains to be identified. H1 contains MAPT which is the best candidate, but also other genes such as CRHR1 and IMP5 that may account for the association as well. Data from our previous study of the Norwegian population supported the functional variant being located within a c. 90-kb interval that contains MAPT exons 1–4 [15]; however, the finding was not replicated in an admixed US population [21]. Further studies of large populations from diverse ethnicities will be required to refine the minimum interval and ultimately identify the responsible variant. Given the findings that H1 may act synergistically with variants in the α-synuclein (SNCA) and glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK3B) genes in determining risk for PD [3,27], gene–gene interactions will also be important to consider as they may provide critical insights into mechanisms of disease susceptibility.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Table 1
Supplementary Table 2

Acknowledgments

Disclosure and sources of funding

Mayo Clinic Jacksonville is a Morris K. Udall Parkinson’s Disease Research Center of Excellence (NINDS P50 #NS40256) and a Pacific Alzheimer Research Foundation (PARF) grant C06-01 (RJU, ZKW & MJF). ZKW is also partially funded by P01 AG017216, R01 NS057567, R01 AG015866, and CIHR 121849. CW is supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (PASMP3-123268/1).

Footnotes

Supporting Information

Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article:

Table S1 Allele and genotype frequencies

Table S2 Estimated frequencies for the three haplotypes involving single nucleotide polymorphisms rs62063857, rs1052553, and rs242557

Please note: Wiley-Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

References

  • 1.Dickson DW. Tau and synuclein and their role in neuropathology. Brain Pathol. 1999;9:657–661. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.1999.tb00548.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Giasson BI, Forman MS, Higuchi M, et al. Initiation and synergistic fibrillization of tau and alpha-synuclein. Science. 2003;300:636–640. doi: 10.1126/science.1082324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Goris A, Williams-Gray CH, Clark GR, et al. Tau and alpha-synuclein in susceptibility to, and dementia in, Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol. 2007;62:145–153. doi: 10.1002/ana.21192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wszolek ZK, Pfeiffer RF, Tsuboi Y, et al. Autosomal dominant parkinsonism associated with variable synuclein and tau pathology. Neurology. 2004;62:1619–1622. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000125015.06989.db. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Duda JE, Giasson BI, Mabon ME, et al. Concurrence of alpha-synuclein and tau brain pathology in the Contursi kindred. Acta Neuropathol. 2002;104:7–11. doi: 10.1007/s00401-002-0563-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hutton M, Lendon CL, Rizzu P, et al. Association of missense and 5′-splice-site mutations in tau with the inherited dementia FTDP-17. Nature. 1998;393:702–705. doi: 10.1038/31508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wszolek ZK, Tsuboi Y, Uitti RJ, Reed L, Hutton ML, Dickson DW. Progressive supranuclear palsy as a disease phenotype caused by the S305S tau gene mutation. Brain. 2001;124:1666–1670. doi: 10.1093/brain/124.8.1666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Stefansson H, Helgason A, Thorleifsson G, et al. A common inversion under selection in Europeans. Nat Genet. 2005;37:129–137. doi: 10.1038/ng1508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zody MC, Jiang Z, Fung HC, et al. Evolutionary toggling of the MAPT 17q21. 31 inversion region. Nat Genet. 2008;40:1076–1083. doi: 10.1038/ng.193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rademakers R, Melquist S, Cruts M, et al. High-density SNP haplotyping suggests altered regulation of tau gene expression in progressive supranuclear palsy. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14:3281–3292. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Myers AJ, Kaleem M, Marlowe L, et al. The H1c haplotype at the MAPT locus is associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14:2399–2404. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Baker M, Litvan I, Houlden H, et al. Association of an extended haplotype in the tau gene with progressive supranuclear palsy. Hum Mol Genet. 1999;8:711–715. doi: 10.1093/hmg/8.4.711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pittman AM, Myers AJ, Abou-Sleiman P, et al. Linkage disequilibrium fine mapping and haplotype association analysis of the tau gene in progressive supranuclear palsy and corticobasal degeneration. J Med Genet. 2005;42:837–846. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2005.031377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Farrer M, Skipper L, Berg M, et al. The tau H1 haplotype is associated with Parkinson’s disease in the Norwegian population. Neurosci Lett. 2002;322:83–86. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(02)00106-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Skipper L, Wilkes K, Toft M, et al. Linkage disequilibrium and association of MAPT H1 in Parkinson disease. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;75:669–677. doi: 10.1086/424492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tobin JE, Latourelle JC, Lew MF, et al. Haplotypes and gene expression implicate the MAPT region for Parkinson disease: the GenePD Study. Neurology. 2008;71:28–34. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000304051.01650.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Evans W, Fung HC, Steele J, et al. The tau H2 haplotype is almost exclusively Caucasian in origin. Neurosci Lett. 2004;369:183–185. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.05.119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.de Silva R, Hardy J, Crook J, et al. The tau locus is not significantly associated with pathologically confirmed sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci Lett. 2002;330:201–203. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(02)00742-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Vandrovcova J, Pittman AM, Malzer E, et al. Association of MAPT haplotype-tagging SNPs with sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2009;30:1477–1482. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Winkler S, Konig IR, Lohmann-Hedrich K, Vieregge P, Kostic V, Klein C. Role of ethnicity on the association of MAPT H1 haplotypes and subhaplotypes in Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Hum Genet. 2007;15:1163–1168. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zabetian CP, Hutter CM, Factor SA, et al. Association analysis of MAPT H1 haplotype and subhaplotypes in Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol. 2007;62:137–144. doi: 10.1002/ana.21157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pankratz N, Wilk JB, Latourelle JC, et al. Genomewide association study for susceptibility genes contributing to familial Parkinson disease. Hum Genet. 2009;124:593–605. doi: 10.1007/s00439-008-0582-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.de Silva R, Hope A, Pittman A, et al. Strong association of the Saitohin gene Q7 variant with progressive supranuclear palsy. Neurology. 2003;61:407–409. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000073140.25533.90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gelb DJ, Oliver E, Gilman S. Diagnostic criteria for Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol. 1999;56:33–39. doi: 10.1001/archneur.56.1.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Schaid DJ, Rowland CM, Tines DE, Jacobson RM, Poland GA. Score tests for association between traits and haplotypes when linkage phase is ambiguous. Am J Hum Genet. 2002;70:425–434. doi: 10.1086/338688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Westfall PH, Young SS. Resampling-Based Multiple Testing: Examples and Methods for P-value Adjustment. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kwok JB, Hallupp M, Loy CT, et al. GSK3B polymorphisms alter transcription and splicing in Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol. 2005;58:829–839. doi: 10.1002/ana.20691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table 1
Supplementary Table 2

RESOURCES