Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1985 Dec;82(24):8527–8529. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.24.8527

Gene gating: a hypothesis.

G Blobel
PMCID: PMC390949  PMID: 3866238

Abstract

It is assumed that the genome of a higher eukaryotic organism is organized into a number of distinct three-dimensional (3-D) structures, each characteristic for a given differentiated state. These discrete 3-D structures are envisioned to develop in a hierarchical and largely irreversible manner from an omnipotent 3-D structure of the zygotic genome. The information for these processes is assumed to reside in the genome. The nuclear pore complexes, the peripheral nuclear lamina, and components of the nuclear core are proposed to be among the topologically most proximal organelles that interpret this information and thereby serve in the maintenance and the alteration of the 3-D structure of the genome during development, differentiation, and the cell cycle. The nuclear pore complexes are envisioned to serve as gene-gating organelles capable on interacting specifically with expanded (transcribable) portions of the genome. Their nonrandom distribution on the nuclear surface would reflect the underlying periodic organization of the genome into expanded and compacted domains, alternating with each other. All transcripts of a given gated gene would leave the nucleus by way of that pore complex to which the gene is gated. Implications for cell asymmetry and polarity are discussed and evolutionary considerations are presented.

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ashley T. Specific end-to-end attachment of chromosomes in Ornithogalum virens. J Cell Sci. 1979 Aug;38:357–367. doi: 10.1242/jcs.38.1.357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Avivi L., Feldman M. Arrangement of chromosomes in the interphase nucleus of plants. Hum Genet. 1980;55(3):281–295. doi: 10.1007/BF00290206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berrios M., Osheroff N., Fisher P. A. In situ localization of DNA topoisomerase II, a major polypeptide component of the Drosophila nuclear matrix fraction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Jun;82(12):4142–4146. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.12.4142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blobel G. Intracellular protein topogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Mar;77(3):1496–1500. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.3.1496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Comings D. E. The rationale for an ordered arrangement of chromatin in the interphase nucleus. Am J Hum Genet. 1968 Sep;20(5):440–460. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dwyer N., Blobel G. A modified procedure for the isolation of a pore complex-lamina fraction from rat liver nuclei. J Cell Biol. 1976 Sep;70(3):581–591. doi: 10.1083/jcb.70.3.581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Earnshaw W. C., Halligan B., Cooke C. A., Heck M. M., Liu L. F. Topoisomerase II is a structural component of mitotic chromosome scaffolds. J Cell Biol. 1985 May;100(5):1706–1715. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.5.1706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Feldherr C. M., Kallenbach E., Schultz N. Movement of a karyophilic protein through the nuclear pores of oocytes. J Cell Biol. 1984 Dec;99(6):2216–2222. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.6.2216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Franke W. W. On the universality of nuclear pore complex structure. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1970;105(3):405–429. doi: 10.1007/BF00335464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gerace L., Blobel G. Nuclear lamina and the structural organization of the nuclear envelope. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1982;46(Pt 2):967–978. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1982.046.01.090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gerace L., Blobel G. The nuclear envelope lamina is reversibly depolymerized during mitosis. Cell. 1980 Jan;19(1):277–287. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90409-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gerace L., Blum A., Blobel G. Immunocytochemical localization of the major polypeptides of the nuclear pore complex-lamina fraction. Interphase and mitotic distribution. J Cell Biol. 1978 Nov;79(2 Pt 1):546–566. doi: 10.1083/jcb.79.2.546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Krohne G., Franke W. W., Ely S., D'Arcy A., Jost E. Localization of a nuclear envelope-associated protein by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy using antibodies against a major polypeptide from rat liver fractions enriched in nuclear envelope-associated material. Cytobiologie. 1978 Oct;18(1):22–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lenk R., Ransom L., Kaufmann Y., Penman S. A cytoskeletal structure with associated polyribosomes obtained from HeLa cells. Cell. 1977 Jan;10(1):67–78. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90141-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Markovics J., Glass L., Maul G. G. Pore patterns on nuclear membranes. Exp Cell Res. 1974 Apr;85(2):443–451. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(74)90148-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mathog D., Hochstrasser M., Gruenbaum Y., Saumweber H., Sedat J. Characteristic folding pattern of polytene chromosomes in Drosophila salivary gland nuclei. 1984 Mar 29-Apr 4Nature. 308(5958):414–421. doi: 10.1038/308414a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Maul G. G., Maul H. M., Scogna J. E., Lieberman M. W., Stein G. S., Hsu B. Y., Borun T. W. Time sequence of nuclear pore formation in phytohemagglutinin-stimulated lymphocytes and in HeLa cells during the cell cycle. J Cell Biol. 1972 Nov;55(2):433–447. doi: 10.1083/jcb.55.2.433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Maul G. G. The nuclear and the cytoplasmic pore complex: structure, dynamics, distribution, and evolution. Int Rev Cytol Suppl. 1977;(6):75–186. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mirkovitch J., Mirault M. E., Laemmli U. K. Organization of the higher-order chromatin loop: specific DNA attachment sites on nuclear scaffold. Cell. 1984 Nov;39(1):223–232. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90208-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sedat J., Manuelidis L. A direct approach to the structure of eukaryotic chromosomes. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1978;42(Pt 1):331–350. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1978.042.01.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Singer R. H., Ward D. C. Actin gene expression visualized in chicken muscle tissue culture by using in situ hybridization with a biotinated nucleotide analog. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Dec;79(23):7331–7335. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.23.7331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Unwin P. N., Milligan R. A. A large particle associated with the perimeter of the nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol. 1982 Apr;93(1):63–75. doi: 10.1083/jcb.93.1.63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Weintraub H., Groudine M. Chromosomal subunits in active genes have an altered conformation. Science. 1976 Sep 3;193(4256):848–856. doi: 10.1126/science.948749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES