Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2014 Jan;52(1):379–381. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02443-13

Bacteremia Caused by Microbacterium binotii in a Patient with Sickle Cell Anemia

Sarah N Buss a,b, Richard Starlin c, Peter C Iwen a,b,
Editor: P Bourbeau
PMCID: PMC3911473  PMID: 24197889

Abstract

Microbacterium species are non-spore-forming, Gram-positive rods rarely associated with human disease. In this report, we describe the first case of bacteremia caused by Microbacterium binotii in a patient with sickle cell anemia. The utility of using 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis along with phenotypic methods for identification is shown.

CASE REPORT

A 28-year-old male presented to the emergency department (ED) complaining of fever, fatigue, nausea, and nasal congestion. The patient had a history of sickle cell anemia with recurrent pain crises and narcotic dependence. He reported no other localizing symptoms of infections, admitted no exposures to others who were ill, and had no indwelling lines or hardware.

On physical exam, the patient was febrile (38.4°C/101.2°F) with no other signs of sepsis. Hematological testing revealed leukocytosis, microcytic anemia, and mild thrombocytosis, which were relatively unchanged from prior labs. A urinalysis and chest X-ray were unremarkable. Two sets of blood cultures (BD Bactec; Becton, Dickinson and Co., Sparks, MD) were collected peripherally, and the patient was discharged from the ED with a presumed viral illness. Subsequently, both aerobic blood culture bottles grew small, Gram-positive rods after 43 h of incubation. The patient was asked to return to the hospital for a follow-up evaluation and treatment.

Upon readmission, the patient appeared nontoxic with a low-grade fever (38.0°C/100.4°F). Again, no localizing signs of infection were found, and repeat labs revealed near resolution of leukocytosis. Two sets of additional blood cultures were drawn prior to empirical administration of intravenous (i.v.) piperacillin-tazobactam (4,500 mg, once) and vancomycin (15 mg/kg of body weight, then 1,000 mg every 8 h). The patient rapidly defervesced following antibiotic therapy, with one repeat aerobic blood culture bottle growing Gram-positive rods after 67 h of incubation.

All three positive blood culture bottles produced nonhemolytic colonies about 1 mm in size after subculture to 5% sheep blood agar and overnight incubation at 37°C in ambient air. The isolates were catalase positive and oxidase negative and developed a light-yellow pigment that became more intense over time. Using the RapID CB Plus system (Remel, Lenexa, KS), the isolates produced a microcode of 3755513, which yielded a probability of 99.66% for Oerskovia spp. and 0.34% for Microbacterium spp. Consequently, the isolates were reported as “most closely resembles Oerskovia species.” Antimicrobial MICs were determined using Etest strips (bioMérieux, Durham, NC) and Mueller-Hinton agar containing 5% sheep blood (Remel, Lenexa, KS). Interpretations were based on the criteria for coryneform bacteria found in the CLSI document M45-A2 (1). The isolate was susceptible to linezolid (0.5 μg/ml) and vancomycin (0.5 μg/ml) and nonsusceptible to daptomycin (8.0 μg/ml) (using Etest strips that contain a standard Ca2+ overlay equivalent to 40 μg/ml). Vancomycin was continued for 2 weeks, with repeat blood cultures drawn on day 5 of antibiotic therapy negative for growth. No obvious source for bacteremia was identified, and the patient recovered with no recurrence of the infection to date.

To determine the species identity of the organism, both genotypic and phenotypic methods were utilized. A partial sequence of the 16S rRNA gene (1,404 nucleotides [nt]) was obtained using previously described methods (2), and the sequence was deposited into the GenBank database (accession no. KF534779). The isolate was subsequently identified on the basis of 16S rRNA sequence comparison using the EzTaxon-e server (http://eztaxon-e.ezbiocloud.net/) (3). The analysis showed a 100% sequence similarity to the type strain of Microbacterium binotii (DSM 19164; GenBank accession no. EF567306) and 99.86% similarity with the type strain of Microbacterium neimengense (DSM 24985; GenBank accession no. JN408293). The Basic Local Alignment Search Tool was used to query the sequence (GenBank accession no. KF534779) against GenBank's curated 16S ribosomal sequence database, and 100% sequence similarity to the type strain of M. binotii (DSM 19164; GenBank accession no. NR_044290) was also demonstrated. Since no other genes were described in the literature that allow for differentiation between M. binotii and M. neimengense (4), phenotypic testing was utilized to further characterize the isolate.

The API 50 CHL medium was used to assess fermentation of various carbohydrates according to the manufacturer's instructions (bioMérieux). Additional phenotypic tests were carried out to determine motility in semisolid medium, gelatin hydrolysis within 7 days, growth at 37°C in tryptic soy broth (TSB) containing 5% and 6.5% NaCl (Remel, Lenexa, KS), indole production (Remel), growth in TSB at 37°C and 42°C, urease production (Remel), and H2S production (Remel). Results obtained using the clinical isolate are displayed in Table 1 and are compared to previously published results (49) obtained using the five most closely related species (based on 16S rRNA analysis). The combined results of phenotypic testing and 16S rRNA sequencing identified the clinical isolate as M. binotii.

TABLE 1.

Phenotypic characteristics useful for differentiation of Microbacterium species as generated in this study (clinical isolate) and from previously published reports

Characteristic Resultc
Clinical isolate M. binotii DSM 19164 M. neimengense DSM 24985 M. resistens DSM 11986 M. thalassium DSM 12511 M. lemovicicum DSM 25044
16S rRNA % similarity NA 100 99.86 98.36 98.22 98.07
Pigment Y Y Y Y Y O
Catalase + + + ND +
l-Arabinosea + + ND ND
d-Galactosea + + ND ND
d-Glucosea + + + + +
d-Fructosea + + ND ND ND
d-Mannitola + + ND
Sucrosea + + + +
Motility b
Gelatin hydrolysis + V
Growth in 5% NaCl + + ND +
Growth in 6.5% NaCl ND +
Growth at 37°C + + + + +
Growth at 42°C +
Urease production ND ND
H2S production ND ND
Reference(s) PR 5 4 6,7 8 9
a

Acid from carbohydrate fermentation.

b

In a semisolid medium consisting of 2.5% heart infusion broth, 0.2% KNO3, 0.2% K2HPO4, 3% gelatin, and 1.5% agar (wt/vol).

c

NA, not applicable; PR, present report; ND, not done; V, variable; Y, yellow; O, orange; −, negative reaction; +, positive reaction.

Eighty-four species of Microbacterium have been described (List of Prokaryotic Names, www.bacterio.net, accessed 31 October 2013) which are typically associated with environmental sources such as soil, plants, water, industrial air systems, animal products, and insects. Accordingly, M. binotii has been previously identified as a component of the cellulolytic gut flora of beetle larvae (10), and M. binotii strains isolated from the tissue of the Jatropha plant were used to generate published 16S rRNA gene sequences (GenBank accession numbers JQ659823.1 and JQ659630.1). Of these species, only four have been described as pathogens of humans having been associated with a wide range of clinical specimens. Reported infections caused by Microbacterium species include endophthalmitis caused by a Microbacterium species that most closely resembled Microbacterium laevaniformans (11), catheter-related bacteremias caused by a motile Microbacterium sp., (12), isolates that most closely resembled M. oxydans and Microbacterium trichothecenolyticum (13), Microbacterium paraoxydans (14, 15), and an undefined Microbacterium species (16), interstitial pulmonary inflammation caused by M. hydrocarbonoxydans (17), skin and soft tissue infections caused by an undefined Microbacterium species (16), and peritonitis caused by an undefined Microbacterium species (18) and M. paraoxydans (19). Microbacterium binotii has been isolated from human clinical material at least 4 times previously (5, 20). Prior to validation of the species name, Gneiding et al. described isolation of M. binotii in Germany from a superficial wound on a 5-year-old male and from a bone infection of a 23-year-old male with no further clinical details published. In that study, 50 strains of yellow-pigmented, Gram-positive rods isolated from human specimens over the course of 5 years were differentiated to the species level with two isolates (4%) characterized as M. binotii (20). Moreover, Clermont et al. initially described the species of M. binotii using two strains originally isolated from human blood in France (5). No clinical information was provided regarding these isolates.

In the present case, M. binotii was repeatedly isolated in pure culture from aerobic blood culture bottles obtained from a febrile patient with sickle cell disease. At the onset of illness, the patient had no indwelling lines or device. Additionally, he had not received any i.v. medications or been hospitalized in the preceding 6 months, and his infection was unlikely to have been nosocomially acquired. While the source of this infection was unknown, recreational i.v. drug use could not be ruled out given the patient's history of opioid dependence. Additionally, the underlying sickle cell disease may have made the patient vulnerable to infection. Impaired splenic function, complement activation defects, zinc deficiencies, and various mechanical and genetic factors have all been linked to increased susceptibility to infection in sickle cell anemics (21). This increased susceptibility has been described for encapsulated and thus poorly opsonized bacteria, as well as Chlamydophila pneumoniae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and other Gram-negative organisms (21). There was no obvious link between M. binotii and the organism types that disproportionately affect individuals with sickle cell anemia.

Previously reported cases of bacteremia caused by Microbacterium species involved catheter-related infections (1216). In 5 of the 6 published cases that provided information regarding treatment of patients, catheter removal was necessary for clearance of the infection (1316). The antibiotics used for treatment included teicoplanin (400 mg/day for 10 days) (15), vancomycin (10 days) with ceftazidime (2 days) (16), ampicillin (100 mg/kg/day) (13, 14), and vancomycin alone (13). In the one case that did not require catheter removal, vancomycin (10 days) and ceftriaxone (1 day) were utilized for successful treatment (16). In the present case, empirical therapy was with intravenous piperacillin-tazobactam (4,500 mg i.v., once) and vancomycin (one dose of 15 mg/kg i.v.). The patient defervesced following empirical therapy, and vancomycin (1,000 mg every 8 h for 2 weeks) was then continued following the results of susceptibility testing (vancomycin MIC of 0.5 μg/ml).

Due to difficulty in identification, Microbacterium species have been described as diphtheroids, Corynebacterium spp., or CDC group A-4 or A-5 bacteria in previous reports (22). Additionally, Microbacterium species have been misidentified using the API Coryne system (bioMérieux) (13, 20, 23) and the RapID CB Plus system (Remel) as noted in this study, rendering these systems of limited utility for identification of yellow-pigmented, Gram-positive rods. The utility of using the 16S rRNA gene target along with phenotypic methods for identification was shown in this study. With the increased use of molecular methods and mass spectrometry in clinical laboratories, Microbacterium species isolated from clinical specimens are likely to be correctly identified to the genus or species level more often than in the past. Consequently, human infections linked to Microbacterium species, including M. binotii, will likely be encountered more frequently.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 6 November 2013

REFERENCES

  • 1.CLSI 2010. Methods for antimicrobial dilution and disk susceptibility testing of infrequently isolated or fastidious bacteria; approved guideline—second edition. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wolfgang WJ, Carpenter AN, Cole JA, Gronow S, Habura A, Jose S, Nazarian EJ, Kohlerschmidt DJ, Limberger R, Schoonmaker-Bopp D, Spröer C, Musser KA. 2011. Neisseria wadsworthii sp. nov. and Neisseria shayeganii sp. nov., isolated from clinical specimens. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 61:91–98. 10.1099/ijs.0.022426-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kim O-S, Cho Y-J, Lee K, Yoon S-H, Kim M, Na H, Park S-C, Jeon YS, Lee J-H, Yi H, Won S, Chun J. 2012. Introducing EzTaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 62:716–721. 10.1099/ijs.0.038075-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gao M, Wang M, Zhang Y-C, Zou X-L, Xie L-Q, Hu H-Y, Xu J, Gao J-L, Sun J-G. 2012. Microbacterium neimengense sp. nov., isolated from the rhizosphere of maize. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 63:236–240 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Clermont D, Diard S, Bouchier C, Vivier C, Bimet F, Motreff L, Welker M, Kallow W, Bizet C. 2009. Microbacterium binotii sp. nov., isolated from human blood. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 59:1016–1022. 10.1099/ijs.0.003160-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Funke G, Lawson PA, Nolte FS, Weiss N, Collins MD. 1998. Aureobacterium resistens sp. nov., exhibiting vancomycin resistance and teicoplanin susceptibility. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 158:89–93. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1998.tb12805.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Behrendt U, Ulrich A, Schumann P. 2001. Description of Microbacterium foliorum sp. nov. and Microbacterium phyllosphaerae sp. nov., isolated from the phyllosphere of grasses and the surface litter after mulching the sward, and reclassification of Aureobacterium resistens (Funke et al. 1998.) as Microbacterium resistens comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 51:1267–1276 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Takeuchi M, Hatano K. 1998. Proposal of six new species in the genus Microbacterium and transfer of Flavobacterium marinotypicum ZoBell and Upham to the genus Microbacterium as Microbacterium maritypicum comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 48(Part 3):973–982 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mondani L, Piette L, Christen R, Bachar D, Bertomieu C, Chapon V. 2013. Microbacterium lemovicicum sp. nov., a bacterium isolated from a natural uranium-rich soil. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 63(Part 7):2600–2606 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Huang S, Sheng P, Zhang H. 2012. Isolation and identification of cellulolytic bacteria from the gut of Holotrichia parallela larvae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 13:2563–2577. 10.3390/ijms13032563 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Funke G, Haase G, Schnitzler N, Schrage N, Reinert RR. 1997. Endophthalmitis due to Microbacterium species: case report and review of Microbacterium infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 24:713–716. 10.1093/clind/24.4.713 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Alonso-Echanove J, Shah SS, Valenti AJ, Dirrigl SN, Carson LA, Arduino MJ, Jarvis WR. 2001. Nosocomial outbreak of Microbacterium species bacteremia among cancer patients. J. Infect. Dis. 184:754–760. 10.1086/323080 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lau SKP, Woo PCY, Woo GKS, Yuen K-Y. 2002. Catheter-related Microbacterium bacteremia identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:2681–2685. 10.1128/JCM.40.7.2681-2685.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Laffineur K, Avesani V, Cornu G, Charlier J, Janssens M, Wauters G, Delmée M. 2003. Bacteremia due to a novel Microbacterium species in a patient with leukemia and description of Microbacterium paraoxydans sp. nov. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:2242–2246. 10.1128/JCM.41.5.2242-2246.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Enoch DA, Richardson MP, Hill RLR, Scorer PM, Sismey A. 2011. Central venous catheter-related bacteraemia due to Microbacterium paraoxydans in a patient with no significant immunodeficiency. J. Clin. Pathol. 64:179–180. 10.1136/jcp.2010.084210 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Adderson EE, Boudreaux JW, Hayden RT. 2008. Infections caused by coryneform bacteria in pediatric oncology patients. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 27:136–141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Giammanco GM, Pignato S, Grimont PAD, Grimont F, Santangelo C, Leonardi G, Giuffrida A, Legname V, Giammanco G. 2006. Interstitial pulmonary inflammation due to Microbacterium sp. after heart transplantation. J. Med. Microbiol. 55:335–339. 10.1099/jmm.0.46219-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Adames H, Baldoví S, Martin-Cleary C, Ortiz A, Esteban J. 2010. Peritonitis due to Microbacterium sp in a patient on cycler peritoneal dialysis. Perit. Dial. Int. J. Int. Soc. Perit. Dial. 30:669–670. 10.3747/pdi.2010.00075 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Miyamoto M, Sakurada T, Oishi D, Koitabashi K, Hanada K, Takemura H, Shibagaki Y, Yasuda T, Kimura K. 2013. The first case report of peritoneal dialysis related peritonitis caused by Microbacterium paraoxydans. Clin. Nephrol. 79:402–406. 10.5414/CN107209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gneiding K, Frodl R, Funke G. 2008. Identities of Microbacterium spp. encountered in human clinical specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:3646–3652. 10.1128/JCM.01202-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Booth C, Inusa B, Obaro SK. 2010. Infection in sickle cell disease: a review. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 14:e2–e12. 10.1016/j.ijid.2009.03.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Funke G, Falsen E, Barreau C. 1995. Primary identification of Microbacterium spp. encountered in clinical specimens as CDC coryneform group A-4 and A-5 bacteria. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:188–192 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Almuzara MN, De Mier C, Rodríguez CR, Famiglietti AMR, Vay CA. 2006. Evaluation of API Coryne system, version 2.0, for diphteroid Gram-positive rods identification with clinical relevance. Rev. Argent. Microbiol. 38:197–201 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES