Skip to main content
Journal of Virology logoLink to Journal of Virology
. 2014 Jan;88(2):1389–1393. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02662-13

Expression Profile of MicroRNAs in Epstein-Barr Virus-Infected AGS Gastric Carcinoma Cells

Aron R Marquitz a, Anuja Mathur a, Pauline E Chugh a,b, Dirk P Dittmer a,b, Nancy Raab-Traub a,b,
PMCID: PMC3911632  PMID: 24227849

Abstract

Latent infection with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is responsible for multiple types of malignancies, including 10% of all gastric carcinomas. The microRNA (miRNA) expression in several EBV-infected AGS gastric carcinoma cell lines was determined. Infected cells expressed the viral BamHI A rightward transcript (BART) miRNAs at high levels and had consistently decreased expression of a small fraction of cellular miRNAs with specific downregulation of tumor suppressor miRNAs. These changes likely reflect expression of the viral noncoding RNAs and not latent protein expression.

TEXT

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a ubiquitous human herpesvirus in which latent infection is associated with a number of malignancies, including multiple types of B-cell lymphomas, nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), and gastric carcinoma (GC) (1, 2). EBV expresses a diverse subset of latent proteins with oncogenic potential in lymphomas in immunocompromised patients but a much more restricted set of viral proteins in malignancies in patients with intact immune systems. In addition, EBV expresses multiple noncoding RNAs during all types of latency, including two clusters of microRNAs (miRNAs). The largest set of miRNAs, the BamHI A rightward transcript (BART) miRNAs, are 44 miRNAs processed from the introns of the BARTs that are expressed at high levels in EBV epithelial malignancies (35). Infection of the gastric carcinoma cell line, AGS, with EBV has recently been shown to induce a more transformed phenotype, with dramatic changes in the cellular expression profile despite the expression of only one latent viral protein, EBNA1, to any significant level (6). A significant fraction of the changes in cellular expression likely reflect expression of the BART RNAs (6).

To profile the expression pattern of the BART miRNAs in infected AGS cells, five additional clonally infected lines were established by incubation of induced Akata-BX1 cells with uninfected AGS cells and selection for green fluorescent protein (GFP)-positive, G418-resistant clones. The viral protein expression pattern was determined by Western blotting and was nearly identical to that of the original cell line, with expression of only EBNA1 at a significant level (Fig. 1A). A small and somewhat variable amount of LMP1, which has previously been shown to not affect cellular gene expression, was expressed in these cell lines (6). Analysis of EBER expression by using quantitative reverse transcription (RT)-PCR that amplifies a conserved region revealed that all six EBV-infected AGS cell lines (AGS-EBV) expresses both EBER1 and EBER2, with consistently higher levels of EBER2 than are expressed by the Jijoye lymphoid cell line (Fig. 1B). Importantly, each clone had improved colony formation in soft agar, indicating that the transformed phenotype of latent EBV infection in this cell line was highly reproducible (Fig. 1C and D).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Multiple clonal infections of AGS cells are anchorage independent with restricted viral expression. (A) Western blot for latent viral protein expression in AGS-EBV clonal cell lines. The five new clones are compared to the original AGS-EBV cell line, to parental cells as a negative control (AGS), and to a type III Burkitt's lymphoma as a positive control (Jijoye). Western blots were probed with anti-LMP1 (S12 hybridoma supernatant), anti-LMP2 (clone 14B7; abcam), anti-EBNA1 (OT1x monoclonal antibody), anti-EBNA2 (PE2 monoclonal antibody), or anti-HSC70 (Santa Cruz; sc-7298) as a loading control. An overexposed lane of LMP1 is shown to demonstrate the small amount of LMP1 present in some of the cell lines. (B) Quantitative RT-PCR for EBER expression in AGS-EBV cells. The bars represent the average EBER expression levels across two RNA preparations from each of the six AGS-EBV cell lines relative to the average from three independent RNA preparations from Jijoye cells. PCR was performed with the Qiagen Quantifast SYBR green RT-PCR kit and the following primers: EBER1, 5′-ACCTACGCTGCCCTAGAGGT and 3′-TGGGAAGACAACCACAGACA; EBER2, 5′-GGAGGAGAAGAGAGGCTTCC and 3′-ATAGCGGACAAGCCGAATAC. (C and D) Soft agar assay of AGS-EBV cells. Cells were seeded in F12 medium with 0.5% Bacto agar and allowed to grow for 10 days. Colonies were then stained with 0.005% crystal violet and scored for growth (C) or photographed at ×100 magnification (D). AGS cells infected with EBV grow larger colonies in soft agar, with a lack of the hollow, aborted colonies seen in the parental cells. An example of an aborted colony is indicated by an arrow in panel D. All five new clones of infected cells show similar phenotypes of increased anchorage-independent growth.

To profile the expression level of the viral miRNAs in these cell lines, small-RNA libraries were created using an Illumina TrueSeq small-RNA sample preparation kit and sequenced on a HiSeq 2000 sequencing system. The libraries are specific for miRNAs, as the RNAs are selected for size and the 3′ adapter is specific for RNA containing a 3′ hydroxyl group characteristic of miRNAs. In total, eight libraries were sequenced, two libraries from the parental AGS cell line, two libraries from the original AGS-EBV cell line, and one library each from new clones 1 and 2, as well as a library from the NPC cell line C666 and one from the NPC xenograft C15 for comparison. After processing was performed to remove adapter sequences, reads were aligned to the human (hg19) and viral (NC_007605) genomes using the Bowtie short read aligner. Confirming the size selection, the vast majority of reads were 20 to 24 bases. Reads of 16 to 25 nucleotides in length that overlapped by at least 16 nucleotides with mature miRNA coordinates obtained from miRBASE were counted as miRNA reads in the analysis in order to not exclude miRNAs with differential 5′ and 3′ processing, which is common in EBV miRNAs (Table 1) (7). A small fraction of the reads from the parental cells aligned to the EBV genome, although most were extremely short reads and likely nonspecific. However, very low levels of authentic EBV miRNAs were detected in these samples. It is not clear if this is due to some minor level of contamination during sample preparation or a low level of background EBV infection in the parental cell line. The numbers of total reads and miRNAs sequenced are shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Summary of small-RNA sequencing results

Library No. of reads
No. of miRNAs
% viral miRNAs
Total Mapped to human Mapped to EBV Human EBV
Parental AGS 1 35,111,900 33,305,259 445,435 22,884,865 7,705 0.03
Parental AGS 2 19,200,981 18,250,058 1,343,213 14,988,219 5,134 0.03
AGS-EBV 1 56,873,929 51,935,642 4,317,658 41,696,846 3,913,670 8.58
AGS-EBV 2 24,244,558 21,212,801 4,529,355 16,841,905 2,484,335 12.85
Clone 1 30,010,016 24,889,072 5,441,869 18,042,838 4,060,515 18.37
Clone 2 23,432,180 19,467,911 5,176,603 12,263,106 3,163,597 20.51
C666 24,241,258 18,475,830 7,185,207 8,748,402 5,693,242 39.42
C15 37,510,160 29.354.352 11,383,451 3,076,020 4,137,077 57.36

Each of the EBV-infected cell lines had a large fraction of their total miRNA pool derived from the virus, with 57% of all miRNAs in the C15 NPC tumor encoded by EBV (Fig. 2). The AGS-EBV cell lines have an expression pattern consistent with the pattern of the NPC cells and other epithelial EBV malignancies in which the BART miRNAs are very highly expressed and the BHRF1 miRNAs are rarely expressed (3). Expression of the BHRF1 miRNAs was essentially negligible in the C15 and C666 NPC samples, while a few hundred reads were detected in the AGS-EBV cells (see Data Set S1 in the supplemental material). As these miRNAs have been shown to increase upon induction of viral replication, the BHRF1 miRNA reads may be due to expression in a small subset of cells with permissive infection. Overall, the pattern of abundance of the individual BART miRNAs was quite consistent across the AGS-EBV clones and the NPC samples, suggesting similar processing in these different cell types. However, this pattern of BART abundance is distinct from that reported in other profiling studies done in NPC, and there is little consistency for one pattern of BART miRNA abundance in the literature (5, 79). This may reflect differences in techniques and informatics between studies.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

EBV miRNA counts from small-RNA libraries. The number of sequencing reads mapped to the mature miRNAs of EBV is indicated per 10 million total miRNAs to normalize for sequencing depth in each library. The value displayed for AGS-EBV is an average of results for four sequencing libraries, two from the original AGS-EBV cell line and one each from the first two newly made clones. The inset displays the relative contribution of EBV to the total pool of miRNAs from each of the cell lines. Again, the value for the AGS-EBV cells is an average of results for four samples, with the standard error of the mean indicated by error bars.

In order to determine whether there were any changes in the abundance of cell-derived miRNAs in response to EBV infection of AGS cells, the aligned human sequences were imported into the Partek genomic suite software, which was used to calculate significant changes in human miRNA levels. miRNA changes with a P value of <0.05 were considered significant, while those that represented less than 0.05% of the total pool were excluded. A small subset of the human miRNAs was downregulated upon EBV infection, with no miRNAs increased by infection. Interestingly, the downregulated miRNAs included several miRNAs that act as tumor suppressors (see Data Set S1 in the supplemental material). The miRNA expression profile of the two NPC line sequences was substantially different from that of the AGS cells. It is likely that the considerable differences in the cellular miRNA profiles between AGS-EBV and the C15 NPC may reflect the contribution of viral proteins expressed in the C15 NPC tumor, including abundant LMP1.

To confirm these findings and expand the number of samples tested, Exiqon miRNA PCR arrays were performed. A total of 10 arrays were performed using three unique preparations of parental AGS RNA, two from the original AGS-EBV cell line, and one each from the five individual clones of AGS-EBV cells (see Data Set S2 in the supplemental material). The data from the PCR arrays largely confirmed the sequencing data, with many of the same miRNAs downregulated in response to EBV infection (Table 2). The fold changes tended to be larger with the PCR method than with the sequencing method, which may reflect normalization to housekeeping genes for the PCR data whereas the sequencing data are normalized to the total human miRNA pool. This result would also be consistent with EBV infection's decreasing the overall abundance of human miRNAs, perhaps due to competition for processing with the viral miRNAs or reported effects on Dicer function (10). Two miRNA families, the let-7 family and the miR-200 family, both of which are known tumor suppressor families, were heavily represented in the downregulated miRNAs (11, 12). These findings confirm previous findings indicating decreased expression of the miR-200 family of miRNAs in EBV-infected AGS cells and the observation that the levels of miR-200 family members are lower in EBV-positive GCs than in EBV-negative GCs (13, 14). Both methods of profiling indicated that miR-143, which has also been shown to act as a tumor suppressor in a number of different types of cancer, was significantly decreased (1517).

TABLE 2.

Host miRNAs downregulated by EBV infection of AGS cellsa

miRNA Downregulation determined by:
Sequencing
RT-PCR
P value Fold change P value Fold change
let-7 family
    hsa-let-7a-5p 0.0397 −2.226 0.0442 −1.608
    hsa-let-7b-5p 0.0533 −1.912 0.0135 −2.555
    hsa-let-7f-5p 0.0434 −1.696 0.1935 −1.681
    hsa-mir-98-5p 0.0471 −2.219 0.0617 −3.566
miR-200 family
    hsa-miR-200a-3p 0.1446 −1.624 0.0133 −2.315
    hsa-miR-200b-3p 0.0225 −1.757 0.0352 −2.498
    hsa-miR-200c-3p 0.0480 −1.684 0.0328 −1.857
    hsa-miR-429 0.0717 −1.838 0.0195 −2.591
Others
    hsa-miR-143-3p 0.1416 −2.974 0.0014 −6.090
    hsa-miR-146b-5p 0.1337 −1.954 0.0234 −4.106
    hsa-miR-148a-3p 0.0760 −1.997 0.0087 −3.135
    hsa-miR-181b-5p 0.1252 −2.004 0.0400 −2.589
    hsa-miR-23a-3p 0.0080 −1.840 0.0261 −2.073
    hsa-miR-24-3p 0.1091 −1.945 0.0336 −1.807
    hsa-miR-27a-3p 0.0149 −1.345 0.0350 −1.980
    hsa-miR-29a-3p 0.0345 −1.343 0.0226 −2.318
    hsa-miR-92b-3p 0.1022 −1.843 0.0482 −2.305
a

miRNA changes were considered highly confident with a P value of <0.05 by one method and showed a confirmatory change with a P value of < 0.20 by the other method. miRNAs that represent <0.05% of the total pool (based on sequencing data) were excluded.

To evaluate the potential effects of viral protein expression on host tumor suppressor miRNAs, EBNA1, the one viral protein significantly expressed in AGS cells, was overexpressed in uninfected AGS cells and the effects on a subset of the cellular tumor suppressor miRNAs was assessed using quantitative RT-PCR (Fig. 3A). Expression of EBNA1 at substantially higher levels than that of EBV-infected cells reduced miR-143 levels but did not affect the five other miRNAs tested (Fig. 3B). To ensure that the trace levels of LMP1 expressed in these cells was not responsible for the decreased expression of the tumor suppressor miRNAs, a dominant negative LMP1 was overexpressed to inhibit any residual LMP1 function in the AGS-EBV cells (Fig. 3C) (18). Inhibition of LMP1 did not increase expression of any of the miRNAs tested (Fig. 3D).

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Lack of regulation of tumor suppressor miRNAs by EBV latent proteins. (A) Western blot demonstrating the overexpression of EBNA1. Parental AGS cells were stably transfected with the pc3OriPE vector that contains the EBV oriP sequence as well as the EBNA1 open reading frame. Western blots were probed with anti-EBNA1 (OT1x monoclonal antibody) or anti-HSC70 (Santa Cruz; sc-7298) antibody as a loading control. (B) Quantitative RT-PCR for six indicated tumor suppressor miRNAs that are downregulated by EBV infection. PCR was performed using miScript primer assays and the miScript RT-PCR system (Qiagen) from RNA prepared using TRIzol. The data were normalized to that for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and are displayed as the average of the results for three independent RNA preparations. The error bars display the standard errors of the means. (C) Western blot illustrating the overexpression of the LMP1 dominant negative construct. Stable cell lines were made with the pBABE-LMP1DN construct (LMP1DN) or vector control (pBABE) in AGS-EBV cells. Western blots were probed with anti-LMP1 (S12 hybridoma) or anti-GAPDH (Santa Cruz; sc-25778) antibody. An overexposed lane is shown to demonstrate the level of expression of the dominant negative construct over the small amount of wild-type LMP1 in infected cells. (D) Quantitative RT-PCR for tumor suppressor miRNAs in the LMP1DN cell line. PCR was performed as described for panel B.

These results suggest that latent EBV infection modulates the expression pattern of a subset of host miRNAs largely through a mechanism that is independent of latent protein expression. Although it is likely that a variable number of cells in each of the infected cell lines has some expression of replicative genes, the consistent effects on cellular miRNA expression suggest that the changes occur in the majority of cells which are latently infected. Given the dramatic level of EBV BART miRNA expression, it is possible that these host miRNA levels are changed as a secondary effect of EBV miRNAs on expression of transcriptional regulators. Additionally, other EBV noncoding RNAs such as the EBERs may contribute to these effects. Taken together, the data presented demonstrate a significant shift in the total miRNA pool in epithelial cells infected with EBV with very restricted viral protein expression. These changes include both a decrease in host tumor suppressor miRNAs and elevated expression of viral miRNAs with demonstrated oncogenic potential.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental material

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Lindsey Hutt-Fletcher for providing the Akata-BX1 cells that were the source of the EBV in this study, Lori Frappier for the EBNA1 expression plasmid, and Jaap Middeldorp for the generous gift of OT1x antibody to detect EBNA1. We also thank the UNC Lineberger Genomics Core and the UNC High Throughput Sequencing Facility for miRNA library preparation and sequencing.

This study was supported by grant CA138811 to N.R.-T., grant DE018304 to D.P.D., and grant CA19014 to D.P.D. and N.R.-T., all from the National Institutes of Health.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 13 November 2013

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02662-13.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Rickinson AB, Kieff E. 2001. Epstein-Barr virus, p 2575–2627 In Knipe DM, Howley PM. (ed), Fields virology, 4th ed. Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Raab-Traub N. 2002. Epstein-Barr virus in the pathogenesis of NPC. Semin. Cancer Biol. 12:431–441. 10.1016/S1044579X0200086X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cai X, Schafer A, Lu S, Bilello JP, Desrosiers RC, Edwards R, Raab-Traub N, Cullen BR. 2006. Epstein-Barr virus microRNAs are evolutionarily conserved and differentially expressed. PLoS Pathog. 2:e23. 10.1371/journal.ppat.0020023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pfeffer S, Zavolan M, Grasser FA, Chien M, Russo JJ, Ju J, John B, Enright AJ, Marks D, Sander C, Tuschl T. 2004. Identification of virus-encoded microRNAs. Science 304:734–736. 10.1126/science.1096781 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhu JY, Pfuhl T, Motsch N, Barth S, Nicholls J, Grasser F, Meister G. 2009. Identification of novel Epstein-Barr virus microRNA genes from nasopharyngeal carcinomas. J. Virol. 83:3333–3341. 10.1128/JVI.01689-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Marquitz AR, Mathur A, Shair KH, Raab-Traub N. 2012. Infection of Epstein-Barr virus in a gastric carcinoma cell line induces anchorage independence and global changes in gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109:9593–9598. 10.1073/pnas.1202910109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chen SJ, Chen GH, Chen YH, Liu CY, Chang KP, Chang YS, Chen HC. 2010. Characterization of Epstein-Barr virus miRNAome in nasopharyngeal carcinoma by deep sequencing. PLoS One 5:e12745. 10.1371/journal.pone.0012745 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Qiu J, Cosmopoulos K, Pegtel M, Hopmans E, Murray P, Middeldorp J, Shapiro M, Thorley-Lawson DA. 2011. A novel persistence-associated EBV miRNA expression profile is disrupted in neoplasia. PLoS Pathog. 7:e1002193. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wong AM, Kong KL, Tsang JW, Kwong DL, Guan XY. 2012. Profiling of Epstein-Barr virus-encoded microRNAs in nasopharyngeal carcinoma reveals potential biomarkers and oncomirs. Cancer 118:698–710. 10.1002/cncr.26309 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Iizasa H, Wulff BE, Alla NR, Maragkakis M, Megraw M, Hatzigeorgiou A, Iwakiri D, Takada K, Wiedmer A, Showe L, Lieberman P, Nishikura K. 2010. Editing of Epstein-Barr virus-encoded BART6 microRNAs controls their Dicer targeting and consequently affects viral latency. J. Biol. Chem. 285:33358–33370. 10.1074/jbc.M110.138362 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Boyerinas B, Park SM, Hau A, Murmann AE, Peter ME. 2010. The role of let-7 in cell differentiation and cancer. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 17:F19–F36. 10.1677/ERC-09-0184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hill L, Browne G, Tulchinsky E. 2013. ZEB/miR-200 feedback loop: at the crossroads of signal transduction in cancer. Int. J. Cancer 132:745–754. 10.1002/ijc.27708 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lin Z, Wang X, Fewell C, Cameron J, Yin Q, Flemington EK. 2010. Differential expression of the miR-200 family microRNAs in epithelial and B cells and regulation of Epstein-Barr virus reactivation by the miR-200 family member miR-429. J. Virol. 84:7892–7897. 10.1128/JVI.00379-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Uozaki H, Takada K, Fukayama M. 2010. Downregulation of microRNA-200 in EBV-associated gastric carcinoma. Cancer Res. 70:4719–4727. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-4620 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Borralho PM, Simoes AE, Gomes SE, Lima RT, Carvalho T, Ferreira DM, Vasconcelos MH, Castro RE, Rodrigues CM. 2011. miR-143 overexpression impairs growth of human colon carcinoma xenografts in mice with induction of apoptosis and inhibition of proliferation. PLoS One 6:e23787. 10.1371/journal.pone.0023787 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chen X, Guo X, Zhang H, Xiang Y, Chen J, Yin Y, Cai X, Wang K, Wang G, Ba Y, Zhu L, Wang J, Yang R, Zhang Y, Ren Z, Zen K, Zhang J, Zhang CY. 2009. Role of miR-143 targeting KRAS in colorectal tumorigenesis. Oncogene 28:1385–1392. 10.1038/onc.2008.474 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ni Y, Meng L, Wang L, Dong W, Shen H, Wang G, Liu Q, Du J. 2013. MicroRNA-143 functions as a tumor suppressor in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Gene 517:197–204. 10.1016/j.gene.2012.12.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Brennan P, Floettmann JE, Mehl A, Jones M, Rowe M. 2001. Mechanism of action of a novel latent membrane protein-1 dominant negative. J. Biol. Chem. 276:1195–1203. 10.1074/jbc.M005461200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material

Articles from Journal of Virology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES