Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1983 Nov;80(21):6732–6734. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.21.6732

Modifiers of mutation rate: Evolutionary optimum with complete selfing

Kent E Holsinger , Marcus W Feldman ‡,§
PMCID: PMC391245  PMID: 16593388

Abstract

It often has been assumed that, for infinite random mating populations in a constant environment, natural selection will favor genotypes at a neutral modifier locus that minimize the mutation rate. Mathematical modeling of this process confirms this assertion, independent of the selection regime. The same model under conditions of complete selfing can produce, under certain nondegenerate overdominance conditions, an optimum mutation rate below which increased mutation is favored and above which decreased mutation is favored. This occurs with unidirectional mutation models and a class of reversible mutation models with fitness overdominance. This is the first time that such a modifier optimum has been produced analytically for an infinite population in a constant environment.

Keywords: inbreeding, evolution of mutation, genetic modifiers, evolutionary optimum

Full text

PDF
6732

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Charlesworth D., Charlesworth B., Strobeck C. Selection for recombination in partially self-fertilizing populations. Genetics. 1979 Sep;93(1):237–244. doi: 10.1093/genetics/93.1.237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cox E. C. Bacterial mutator genes and the control of spontaneous mutation. Annu Rev Genet. 1976;10:135–156. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.10.120176.001031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Feldman M. W., Christiansen F. B., Brooks L. D. Evolution of recombination in a constant environment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Aug;77(8):4838–4841. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.8.4838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Feldman M. W. Selection for linkage modification. I. Random mating populations. Theor Popul Biol. 1972 Sep;3(3):324–346. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(72)90007-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gillespie J. H. Evolution of the mutation rate at a heterotic locus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Apr;78(4):2452–2454. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.4.2452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Holsinger K. E., Feldman M. W. Linkage modification with mixed random mating and selfing: a numerical study. Genetics. 1983 Feb;103(2):323–333. doi: 10.1093/genetics/103.2.323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Karlin S., McGregor J. Towards a theory of the evolution of modifier genes. Theor Popul Biol. 1974 Feb;5(1):59–103. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(74)90052-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Teague R. A result on the selection of recombination altering mechanisms. J Theor Biol. 1976 Jun;59(1):25–32. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(76)80022-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES