Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1985 Oct;82(19):6586–6589. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.19.6586

Growing Xenopus oocytes have spare translational capacity.

M A Taylor, A D Johnson, L D Smith
PMCID: PMC391254  PMID: 3863115

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that exogenous mRNAs injected into full-grown (stage 6) Xenopus oocytes are translated only at the expense of endogenous messages; translational capacity is limited. In this report, we demonstrate that injection of globin mRNA into small, stage 4 oocytes results in an increase in total protein synthesis without a concomitant decrease in the translation of endogenous mRNAs. The absence of competition with endogenous messages in stage 4 oocytes, injected with globin mRNA, compared with stage 6 oocytes, was not due to differential turnover of the injected mRNA. Hybridization of RNA from mRNA-injected oocytes at both stages revealed that similar amounts of globin mRNA were present. These results are interpreted to mean that protein synthesis in growing oocytes is limited by the availability of mRNA and not components of the translational machinery. This conclusion, however, does not apply to all mRNA classes. The capacity of stage 4 oocytes to translate a mRNA (zein) on membrane-bound polysomes is as restricted as reported previously for stage 6 oocytes. This result suggests that putative membrane binding sites or rough endoplasmic reticulum content are limited in oocytes at both stages. The possible role of association of injected mRNA with endogenous proteins that prevent translation is discussed.

Full text

PDF
6586

Images in this article

6587Image
on p.6587
6587Image
on p.6587
6588Image
on p.6588
6588Image
on p.6588

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amalric F., Merkel C., Gelfand R., Attardi G. Fractionation of mitochondrial RNA from HeLa cells by high-resolution electrophoresis under strongly denaturing conditions. J Mol Biol. 1978 Jan 5;118(1):1–25. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(78)90241-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson D. M., Smith L. D. Synthesis of heterogeneous nuclear RNA in full-grown oocytes of Xenopus laevis (Daudin). Cell. 1977 Jul;11(3):663–671. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90083-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson J. N., Schimke R. T. Partial purification of the ovalbumin gene. Cell. 1976 Mar;7(3):331–338. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(76)90162-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Darnbrough C. H., Ford P. J. Identification in Xenopus laevis of a class of oocyte-specific proteins bound to messenger RNA. Eur J Biochem. 1981 Jan;113(3):415–424. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1981.tb05081.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dixon L. K., Ford P. J. Regulation of protein synthesis and accumulation during oogenesis in Xenopus laevis. Dev Biol. 1982 Oct;93(2):478–497. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(82)90136-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Drummond D. R., McCrae M. A., Colman A. Stability and movement of mRNAs and their encoded proteins in Xenopus oocytes. J Cell Biol. 1985 Apr;100(4):1148–1156. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.4.1148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dumont J. N. Oogenesis in Xenopus laevis (Daudin). I. Stages of oocyte development in laboratory maintained animals. J Morphol. 1972 Feb;136(2):153–179. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1051360203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Larkins B. A., Hurkman W. J. Synthesis and deposition of zein in protein bodies of maize endosperm. Plant Physiol. 1978 Aug;62(2):256–263. doi: 10.1104/pp.62.2.256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Larkins B. A., Pedersen K., Handa A. K., Hurkman W. J., Smith L. D. Synthesis and processing of maize storage proteins in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Dec;76(12):6448–6452. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.12.6448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Laskey R. A., Mills A. D., Gurdon J. B., Partington G. A. Protein synthesis in oocytes of Xenopus laevis is not regulated by the supply of messenger RNA. Cell. 1977 Jun;11(2):345–351. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90051-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Richter J. D., Jones N. C., Smith L. D. Stimulation of Xenopus oocyte protein synthesis by microinjected adenovirus RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Jun;79(12):3789–3793. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.12.3789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Richter J. D., Smith L. D. Developmentally regulated RNA binding proteins during oogenesis in Xenopus laevis. J Biol Chem. 1983 Apr 25;258(8):4864–4869. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Richter J. D., Smith L. D. Differential capacity for translation and lack of competition between mRNAs that segregate to free and membrane-bound polysomes. Cell. 1981 Nov;27(1 Pt 2):183–191. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90372-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Richter J. D., Smith L. D. Reversible inhibition of translation by Xenopus oocyte-specific proteins. Nature. 1984 May 24;309(5966):378–380. doi: 10.1038/309378a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Richter J. D., Wasserman W. J., Smith L. D. The mechanism for increased protein synthesis during Xenopus oocyte maturation. Dev Biol. 1982 Jan;89(1):159–167. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(82)90304-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schimke R. T., Rhoads R. E., McKnight G. S. Assay of ovalbumin mRNA in reticulocyte lysate. Methods Enzymol. 1974;30:694–701. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(74)30066-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Shih R. J., O'Connor C. M., Keem K., Smith L. D. Kinetic analysis of amino acid pools and protein synthesis in amphibian oocytes and embryos. Dev Biol. 1978 Sep;66(1):172–182. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(78)90282-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Taylor M. A., Smith L. D. Quantitative changes in protein synthesis during oogenesis in Xenopus laevis. Dev Biol. 1985 Jul;110(1):230–237. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(85)90079-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Thomas P. S. Hybridization of denatured RNA and small DNA fragments transferred to nitrocellulose. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Sep;77(9):5201–5205. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.9.5201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wallace R. A., Jared D. W., Dumont J. N., Sega M. W. Protein incorporation by isolated amphibian oocytes. 3. Optimum incubation conditions. J Exp Zool. 1973 Jun;184(3):321–333. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401840305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wasserman W. J., Houle J. G., Samuel D. The maturation response of stage IV, V, and VI Xenopus oocytes to progesterone stimulation in vitro. Dev Biol. 1984 Oct;105(2):315–324. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(84)90288-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wasserman W. J., Richter J. D., Smith L. D. Protein synthesis during maturation promoting factor- and progesterone-induced maturation in Xenopus oocytes. Dev Biol. 1982 Jan;89(1):152–158. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(82)90303-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Webb A. C., LaMarca M. J., Smith L. D. Synthesis of mitochondrial RNA by full-grown and maturing oocytes of Rana pipiens and Xenopus laevis. Dev Biol. 1975 Jul;45(1):44–55. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(75)90239-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES