Abstract
Background:
Infertility has been described as creating a form of stress leading to a variety of psychological problems. Both psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy are effective treatments for infertility stress. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy along with fluoxetine for improvement infertility stress in infertile women.
Materials and Methods:
In a randomized controlled clinical trial, 89 infertile women with mild to moderate depression (Beck scores 10-47) were recruited into the following three groups: i. cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), ii. antidepressant therapy, and iii. control group. Twenty-nine participants in the CBT method received gradual relaxation training, restructuring, and eliminating of negative automatic thoughts and dysfunctional attitudes to infertility for 10 sessions. Thirty participants in the pharmacotherapy group took 20 mg fluoxetine daily for 90 days. Thirty individuals in control group did not receive any intervention. All participants completed fertility problem inventory (FPI) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) at the beginning and end of the study. We applied Chi-square paired t test, ANOVA and Turkey’s test to analyze the data.
Results:
The mean of the infertility stress scores in CBT, fluoxetine, and control groups at the beginning and end of the study were as follows, respectively: 3.5 ± 0.62 vs.2.7 ± 0.62 (p<0.05), 3.5 ± 0.53 vs.3.2 ± 4.4 (p<0.05), and 3.4 ± 0.55 vs. 3.5 ± 0.48. In CBT group, the mean scores of social concern, sexual concern, marital concern, rejection of child-free lifestyle, and need for parenthood decreased meaningfully compared to those before starting the therapy. But in fluoxetine group, mean score of women sexual concern out of those five main problems of infertility reduced significantly. Also, fluoxetine and CBT reduced depression compared to the control group.
Conclusion:
CBT improved the social concerns, sexual concerns, marital concerns, rejection of child-free lifestyle, and need for parenthood more than floxitine group. Thus, CBT was not only a reliable alternative to pharmacotherapy, but also superior to fluoxetine in resolving and reducing of infertility stress (Registration Number: IRCT2012061710048N1).
Keywords: Infertility, Stress, Cognitive Behavior Therapy, Fluoxetine
Introduction
The experience of infertility, defined by some as the infertility crisis, accompanies with physical, economical and social stress that affect all aspects of individual’s life. Maybe it can be said that infertility is one of the most stressful events in infertile people’s life (1, 2). Infertility and psychological difficulties are interrelated with each other. Some researchers believe the psychological difficulties as the cause of infertility, and call it, "stress hypothesis". They believe infertility as a psychosomatic problem. They also investigate the effect of psychological mood on neuroendocrine activities and the pregnancy rate. A study by Gallinelli et al. showed that there are correlations between stress, immunity, and fertility. Their result showed that there was higher serum cortisol and corticotrophin-releasing hormone (CRH) in infertile women than healthy control (3), while the similar studies suggest that higher level of stress accompanies with lower level of success in infertility therapy (4-7). Feeling of threat, sexual concern, guilt, hopelessness and marital problems are related to infertility (8).
But others, who have more supporters, know psychological stress as the result of infertility. According to this thesis, the experience of infertility affects the infertile couple with deep emotional tensions which is the fixed source of psychological and social dreads (9). Various studies reported a rise in anxiety and depression, and also decrease in self-confidence (10-15). The couples’ emotional reaction should be concerned from the very point of diagnosis of infertility, during therapy until success or failure of the process (16). At the moment, there is an international agreement that infertility centers should consider psychological problems. Kainz believes the role of a psychologist in infertility therapy process is investigation of cognitive documents, sexual problems, and marital relationships, while detecting and curing psychosomatic problems relating to fertility is possible through application of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) (17). Psychological council regarding the way of adaption with problem is a good way to avoid failure and hopelessness in infertile women (18). Terzioglu showed that infertile couples who received daily information and support during treatment have lower anxiety and depression scores, indicating higher life satisfaction than control groups (19). Similar studies showed that teaching confronting methods to infertile women gives rise to mental health and reduces depression (20). CBT is a psychotherapeutic approach based upon a combination of basic behavioral and cognitive research. The similar studies showed that psychotherapy is a reliable alternative to pharmacotherapy in order to decrease anxiety and to promote the mental health of infertile women (11, 21). Despite of widespread belief in the worthiness of CBT in the treatment of a variety of psychological problems, relatively, few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions in the field of infertility. There have been no published studies or randomized controlled prospective trials for adequate comparison of the impact of group psychological inventions with pharmacotherapy on improvement of infertility concerns. This study evaluated the different methods in order to achieve the best technique for improvement of infertility stress, while answering this question of whether CBT is a reliable alternative method to fluoxetine in this regard.
Materials and Methods
A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in Fatemeh Alzahra Infertility and Reproductive Health Research Center of the Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran, for nine months during 2007.
After coordination and receiving confirmation from Fatemeh Alzahra Infertility and Reproductive Health Research Center of Babol University of Medical Sciences (Iran), infertile women who had dossier the center, were recruited for this study. The participated women had the following characteristics: less than 45 years of age, more than five years of education, more than two years of infertility, having at least one in vitro fertilization (IVF), no fertility treatment for a three-month interval after IVF, no practicing in any relaxation techniques, no participating in any support group, no taking any psychotherapy, and no assisted reproductive therapy (ART). Five midwives at the center conducted telephone invitation with potential participants. Among 350 invitations, 200 patients accepted to enter the study, so after giving the informed consent form, they were referred to the center. Subsequent to completing the demographic questionnaire and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), a psychologist conducted a face-toface interview. Women either with a score ≤9 or >47 on the BDI, or clinical diagnosis of severe depression were excluded from the study. Thus, only women with minimal, mild, and moderate depression (Beck score 10-47) were included in the study. At the end of the interview session, participants were randomly selected for one of following three groups, CBT, fluoxetine and control, through a computer program. The block randomization was by a computer randomize list in which participants were labeled randomly to number 1-124 by an investigator with no clinical involvement in the trial, like: numbers 1, 4, 7,… for CBT; number 2, 5, 8,… for fluoxetine; and numbers 3, 6, 9,… for control group. Figure 1 shows the flow diagram of participants through each stage of randomized controlled trial. Finally, 89 participants were randomly divided among three groups as follows: CBT (n=29), fluoxetine (n=30), and controls (n=30).
Participants in the CBT group were engaged a two-hour group cognitive behavior therapy session for 10 weeks. Progressive muscle relaxation was added to the sessions 5-10. Groups consisted of 8-12 members, and the therapist, as an expert psychologist, was trained for the CBT program. Therapy was conducted at the Psychiatry Department of the Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran. The first three sessions provided patients with a general orientation to cognitive therapy and the causes of infertility.
In the first three sessions, a gynecologist explained the cause of infertility for each woman. Cognitive therapies included that dysfunctional attitudes to social concerns, sexual concerns, marital concerns, rejection of childfree lifestyle, and need for parenthood more required challenged (22). In sessions 4-6, irrational beliefs about the infertility challenged. Finally, sessions 7-10 taught participants varying techniques for maintaining the change of their dysfunctional beliefs about infertility (23). In addition, session’s 5-10 progressive muscle relaxation of Jacobson was added to the cognitive therapy of Beck model (24-26).
The pharmacotherapy group took a capsule of fluoxetine (20 mg) daily for 90 days. After the interview, 30 capsules, prescribed by a psychiatrist, were provided by the midwives of the center, monthly. The control group didn’t take any drug or psychological intervention. They completed two questionnaires at the beginning of the study and three months after the interview. In CBT group, subjects had therapy interventions, including IVF, anti depression or psychological drug during three months; however, some individuals with stressful events such as family death were excluded from analysis.
All participants completed the Fertility Problem Inventory (FPI) and BDI at the beginning and end of the study. FPI used was a reliable instrument to assess the infertility stress. This instrument contains 46 items and 5 subscales that cover infertile couple’s stress such as social concern, sexual concern, marital relationships, rejection of child-free lifestyle, and need for parenthood. Participants indicated their degree of agreement with each item on a sixpoint Likert scale ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree". Newton et al. (27), Cousineau and Domar (1) reported the internal consistency reliability was 0.22-0.66, testretest reliability was 83%, and its correlation with Beck Inventory was 60%. Also, Persian version of FPI is reported with high reliability (α=0.91) (28). There was a meaningful positive correlation (p<0.01) between Beck Depression Inventory and infertility stress test (0.75) (29). In this sample, the internal consistency reliability of FPI was 0.8. Also, its correlation with BDI was 63%. The mean score of FPI for infertile women was obtained after calculating the scores in every subgroup. The least mean score based on Likret index was 0, "strongly disagree", and the highest one was 6, "strongly agree". All aspects of this protocol were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Babol University of Medical Sciences.
All analyses were performed using SPSS software. Paired t-tests were used to compare the mean scores of FPI and depression tests in each study group, separately, before and after interventions. Analysis of variance was performed to compare the mean scores of the tests in the three study groups at the beginning, and also, at the end of the study. If there was meaning difference among three groups, Posthoc (Turkey’s test) test was used to compare the mean differences. It should be noted that results of this articles has been a part of extend project implemented for Fatemeh Alzahra Fertility and Infertility Health Research Center of the Babol University of Medical Sciences (2007). Comparison pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy in improvement depression, anxiety, and general health reported in previous publications (11, 21). This article focuses on comparison of two types treatment in reducing of infertility problems in dimensions of the social concerns, sexual concerns, marital concerns, rejection of child-free lifestyle, and need for parenthood.
Results
The findings of research showed that there were no statistically significant differences among the three groups in age, education level, and the duration of infertility. The demographic characteristics of the study sample are summarized in table 1.
Table 1.
Criteria | CBTa mean (SD) | Fluoxetine mean (SD) | Control mean (SD) | Fb | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age (Y) | 28.3 (3.8) | 29.8 (5.3) | 28.4 (5.3) | 0.8 | 0.4 |
Education (Y) | 9.2 (2.4) | 9.4 (4.2) | 9.8 (3.9) | 0.4 | 0.2 |
Duration of infertility (Y) | 5.4 (3.9) | 6.3 (3.4) | 5.7 (4.4) | 0.3 | 0.6 |
a; Cognitive behavior therapy and b; ANOVA was performed to compare the mean scores of groups.
Evaluating the mean of FPI scores in infertile women showed that rejection of child-free lifestyle had the highest score in all three groups among five main fertility problems (social, sexual, marital concerns, rejection of child-free lifestyle, and need for parenthood). Although fluoxetine decreased the overall mean scores of FPI, it could only decrease the mean score of sexual concerns among five main fertility problems. Also, mean scores of all five main fertility problems decreased significantly in CBT group in comparison to before starting the therapy. After CBT sessions, overall mean scores of FPI decreased significantly in comparison to before starting the therapy. There were no significant differences in mean scours of control group (Table 2). The results had showed an improvement in depression level in CBT (79.3%) and fluoxetine (50%) groups (p<0.001) compared to previously reported analysis (11).
Table 2.
Groups | CBTa mean (SD) | Fluoxetine mean (SD) | Control mean (SD) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scales | Before | After | P | Before | After | P | Before | After | P |
Social concerns | 2.9 ± 0.72 | *2.1 ± 0.76 | 0.0001 | 2.9 ± 0.59 | 2.8 ± 0.55 | 0.709 | 2.9 ± 0.78 | 3.1 ± 0.96 | 0.066 |
Sexual concerns | 3 ± 0.71 | *2.6 ± 0.68 | 0.007 | 3.1 ± 0.67 | *2.7 ± 0.67 | 0.041 | 2.9 ± 0.75 | 2.9 ± 0.60 | 0.425 |
Marital concerns | 4 ± 0.89 | *3.1 ± 0.97 | 0.020 | 3.8 ± 0.89 | 3.5 ± 0.70 | 0.144 | 3.7 ± 0.75 | 3.8 ± 0.59 | 0.388 |
Rejection of childfree lifestyle | 4.1 ± 0.91 | *3.4 ± 0.94 | 0.002 | 4.3 ± 0.77 | 4.2 ± 0.79 | 0.432 | 4.3 ± 0.78 | 4.2 ± 0.66 | 0.688 |
Need for parenthood | 3 ± 0.73 | *2.3 ± 0.76 | 0.0001 | 3.2 ± 0.99 | 3.2 ± 0.72 | 0.925 | 3.1 ± 0.74 | 3.2 ± 0.74 | 0.580 |
Total score | 3.5 ± 0.62 | *2.7 ± 0.64 | 0.0001 | 3.5 ± 0.53 | *3.2 ± 0.44 | 0.045 | 3.4 ± 0.55 | 3.5 ± 0.48 | 0.373 |
a; Cognitive behavior therapy and Paired t test was used to compare the mean scores, before and after inventions.
Discussion
The results of this study showed that the infertile women’s mean scores for all infertility stress dimensions (social, sexual, marital concerns, rejection of child-free lifestyle, and need for parenthood) were very high. The highest scores were related to inability to accept the life style without a child and marital relationships, which is in concordance to the similar study (4). Basically, for a woman, the need to have child is a fundamental issue, and is considered to be the normal process of life. It is also the symbol of reaching evolution, adulthood and womanish personality (30-32). The role of being a mother is the most important role, and playing this role is suitable for women (33). In different cultures, becoming a parent is a turning point, and is also assumed to be an important occurrence in couple’s life (34). Inability to have a child is a stressful condition for infertile couple (1) because both man and woman are frustrated, damaged and under too much pressure. They may also pay less attention to each other’s needs, so that their relationship will be cold and damaged (35). Alizadeh et al. (28) declared, "Infertile women tolerate too much pressure and this pressure could affect the couple’s interpersonal relationships, and also, can disrupt their marital and sexual relationship which finally leads to a critic condition". They also suggested that CBT psychotherapy is significantly effective on infertility stress. Domar et al. (36) in a controlled clinical trial showed "the impact of group psychological intervention on distress in infertile women".
It evaluated CBT group and supportive psychotherapy group with control group. The results showed that the different stressful subjects relating to psychological indexes of intervention group, especially the CBT group, decreased in comparison to that of control group (36). Cousineau and Domar (1) believed that psychological interventions, especially proper training for adapting different skills in order to assess and mange the stress, had beneficial effects on infertile women. In a similar study by Gharaie et al. (37) the CBT trainings decreased stress and anxiety of infertile women undergoing the infertility therapy. Wallace also showed that stress and anxiety of patient decreased after counseling supports (38), while women in the CBT sessions reached a better mood, and their stress and anxiety decreased compared to control group (36).
Our results revealed a significant decrease in all infertility stress dimensions (social, sexual, marital concerns, rejection of childfree lifestyle, and need for parenthood) in CBT group, whereas in fluoxetine group, there was only a significant decrease in sexual concern dimension. Faramarzi et al. (11) and Antonuccio et al. (39) reported that CBT is not only a reliable alternative to pharmacotherapy, but also superior to fluoxetine in the resolving or reducing of depression and anxiety of infertile women. The other investigations also showed that using CBT could decrease all physical and psychological symptoms such as anxiety, depression, frustration, insomnia, etc (40). In addition, they declared that high level of distress is observed in infertile women who had the least emotional supports from families and spouses (30). So, the infertility centers should provide different therapy programs through which infertile women receive proper support and necessary trainings in order to learn how to manage the stress (41-43).
Our finding confirmed the management of depression in the both fluoxetine and CBT groups that complete description was previously reported by Faramarzi et al. (11). Some similar studies know CBT as the effective therapy for depression (44). Doing psychological interventions through CBT and supportive counseling could not only improve the depression, but also increase reproduction fertility in CBT group by 55%, supportive group by 54%, and control group by 20% (35, 45).
Studies by Thorn reported that infertility counseling decreases the emotional burden of infertility during treatment, while psychological counseling not only supplies the vital emotional support, but also diminishes the drop-out rate in infertility treatment (46, 47). Also, there are results showing that psychological programs decrease negative feelings through group interventions by training necessary skills in order to decrease the depression (48, 49). There were a number of limitations in the current study. The first limitation was that 40 mild to moderate depressed women did not agree to enter treatment protocol. The second limitation was the number of dropouts from experimental and control groups. Fortunately, demographic characteristics of women were the same before and after dropouts. We determined that the number of dropouts did not bias the data in favor of the interventions. Third limitation was cultured band difference in north of IRAN that was a variable response to CBT or compliance for treatment. Forth limitation referred to the nature of two types of treatment. CBT group received more treatment than drug group, so the obtained positive results may be due to more effective counseling programs rather than anything specific about CBT.
Conclusion
CBT was effective on decreasing fertility stress in dimensions of the social concerns, sexual concerns, marital concerns, rejection of child-free lifestyle, and need for parenthood. Also, CBT was superior to fluoxetine for resolving infertility stress. Of course, more studies are needed to investigate the effect of CBT on rate of reproduction fertility in infertile women. This project proposed that it is necessary to investigate the effectiveness of routine CBT to prevent infertility stress in infertile couples.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the Vice Chancellery for Research and Technology Committee of Babol University of Medical Sciences for financial support of the project. Also, the authors thank all participants who attended this study and the following midwives of Fatemeh Alzahra Hospital who invited and encouraged women to participate in this study: Ghofrani, Asef, Mahoti, Firozpour, Golsorkhtabar, Rastegar and Rabian. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest in this article.
References
- 1.Cousineau TM, Domar AD. Psychological impact of infertility. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;21(2):293–308. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Guerra D, Llobera A, Veiga A, Barri PN. Psychiatric morbidity in couples attending a fertility service. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(6):1733–1736. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.6.1733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gallinelli A, Roncaglia R, Matteo ML, Ciaccio I, Volpe A, Facchinetti F. Immunological changes and stress are associated with different implantation rates in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(1):85–91. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)01826-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gourounti K, Anagnostopoulos F, Vaslamatzis G. Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Fertility Problem Inventory in a sample of infertile women undergoing fertility treatment. Midwifery. 2011;27(5):660–667. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lancastle D, Boivin J. Dispositional optimism, trait anxiety, and coping: unique or shared effects on biological response to fertility treatment? Health Psychol. 2005;24(2):171–178. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.24.2.171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cooper BC, Gerber JR, McGettrick AL, Johnson JV. Perceived infertility-related stress correlates with in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(3):714–717. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Karlidere T, Bozkurt A, Ozmenler KN, Ozsahin A, Kucuk T, Yetkin S. The influence of emotional distress on the outcome of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and/or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment among infertile Turkish women. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2008;45(1):55–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Edelmann RJ, Connolly KJ. Psychological aspects of infertility. Br J Med Psychol. 1986;59(Pt 3):209–219. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1986.tb02686.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Greil AL. Infertility and psychological distress: a critical review of the literature. Soc Sci Med. 1997;45(11):1679–1704. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(97)00102-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Najmi B, Ahmadi SS, Ghasemi Gh. Psychological characteristics of infertile couples referring to Isfahan Infertility center. Med Quart J Fertile Infertile. 2001;2:8–8. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Faramarzi M, Alipor A, Esmaelzadeh S, Kheirkhah F, Poladi K, Pash H. Treatment of depression and anxiety in infertile women: cognitive behavioral therapy versus fluoxetine. J Affect Disord. 2008;108(1-2):159–164. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gibson FL, Ungerer JA, Tennant CC, Saunders DM. Parental adjustment and attitudes to parenting after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(3):565–574. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00583-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pasch LA, Dunkel-Schetter C, Christensen A. Differences between husbands’ and wives’ approach to infertility affect marital communication and adjustment. Fertil Steril. 2002;77(6):1241–1247. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03097-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Shahbazi L, Salimi T. Prevalence depression of infertile couple referred to research center of infertility Yazd. JSSU. 2000;8(3):98–105. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pasha H. Evaluation of depression in infertile women using Beck and Hamilton. Int J Fertil Steril. 2011;5(Suppl 1):Pnm–22. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Strauss B. Involuntary Childlessness. Psychological assessment, counseling, and therapy. Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers; 2002. pp. 127–150. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kainz K. The role of the psychologist in the evaluation and treatment of infertility. Women’s Health Issues. 2001;11(6):481–485. doi: 10.1016/s1049-3867(01)00129-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Podolska MZ, Bidzan M. Infertility as a psychological problem. Ginekol Pol. 2011;82(1):44–49. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Terzioglu F. Investigation into effectiveness of counseling on assisted reproductive techniques in Turkey. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;22(3):133–141. doi: 10.3109/01674820109049965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bents H. Behavioral couple therapy for patients with infertility. Jahrb Med Psychol. 1991;5:144–155. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Faramarzi M, Kheirkhah F, Esmaelzadeh S, Alipour A, Hjiahmadi M, Rahnama J. Is psychotherapy a reliable alternative to pharmacotherapy to promote the mental health of infertile women? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;141(1):49–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gloaguen V, Cottraux J, Cucherat M, Blackburn IM. A meta-analysis of the effects of cognitive therapy in depressed patients. J Affect Disord. 1998;49(1):59–72. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(97)00199-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Oei TP, Sullivan LM. Cognitive changes following recovery from depression in a group cognitive-behaviour therapy program. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1999;33(3):407–415. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1614.1999.00562.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Vickers A, Zollman C. ABC of complementary medicine.Hypnosis and relaxation therapies. BMJ. 1999;319(7221):1346–1349. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7221.1346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Beck AT, Rush AJ, Shaw BF, Emery G. Cognitive Therapy of Depression. NewYork: Guilford press; 1976. 128 [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jacobson E. Electrical measurements concerning muscular contraction (tonus) and the cultivation of relaxation in man: relaxation times of individuals. Am J Physiol. 1934;108:573–580. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Newton CR, Sherrard W, Glavac I. The fertility problem inventory: measuring perceived infertility-related stress. Fertil Steril. 1999;72(1):54–62. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00164-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Alizadeh T, Farahani MN, Shahraray M, Alizadegan Sh. The relationship between self- esteem and locus of control with infertility related stress of no related infertile men and women. JRI. 2005;6(2):194–204. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Alice DD, Alan P, Jeffery AD, Amora M, Dalia M, Barbara N, et al. The stress and distress of infertility: Does religion help women cope? SRM. 2005;3(2):45–51. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Benyamini Y, Gozlan M, Kokia E. Women’s and men’s perceptions of infertility and their associations with psychological adjustment: a dyadic approach. Br J Health Psycol. 2009;14(Pt 1):1–16. doi: 10.1348/135910708X279288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Jedrzejczak P, Luczak-Wawrzyniak J, Szyfter J, Przewoźna J, Taszarek-Hauke G, Pawelczyk L. Feelings and emotions in women treated for infertility. Przegl Lek. 2004;61(12):1334–1337. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gourounti K, Anagnostopoulos F, Potamianos G, Lykeridou K, Schmidt L, Vaslamatzis G. Perception of control, coping and psychological stress of infertile women undergoing IVF. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2012;24:670–679. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Abbey F, Andrews M, Hallmant L. Infertillity and subjective well-being: The mediating roles of self-esteem, internal control and interpersonal conflict. J Marriage Fam. 1992;54:408–417. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Erica MT. The stress of infertility. Hum Ecol. 2009;95(1):12–12. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Seible MM, Taymor ML. Emontional aspects of infertility. Fertil Steril. 1982;37(2):137–145. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)46029-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Domar AD, Clapp D, Slawsby E, Kessel B, Orav J, Freizinger M. The impact of group psychological interventions on distress in infertile women. Health Psychol. 2000;19(6):568–575. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.19.6.568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gharaie V, Mazaheri MA, Sahebi A, Peivandi S, Agha Hossinei M. Effect of behavioral-cognitive education on reduction of anxiety in women with primary infertility who undergo GIFT and ZIFT. J Reprod Infertil. 2004;5(2):170–180. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wallace LM. Psychological adjustment to and recovery from laparoscopic sterilization and infertility investigation. J Psychosom Res. 1985;29(5):507–518. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(85)90084-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Antonuccio DO, Thomas M, Danton WG. A cost-effectiveness analysis of cognitive behavior therapy and fluoxetine (Prozac) in the treatment of depression. Behav Ther. 1997;28(2):187–210. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Domar AD, Seibel MM, Benson H. The mind/body program for infertility: a new behavioral treatment approach for women with infertility. Fertil Steril. 1990;53(2):246–249. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)53275-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Klonoff-Cohen H, Chu E, Natarajan L, Sieber W. A prospective study of stress among women undergoing in vitro fertilization or gamete intrafallopian transfer. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(4):675–687. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)02008-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Klonoff-Cohen H, Natarajan L. The concerns during assisted reproductive technologies (CART) scale and pregnancy outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(4):982–988. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.08.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Cousineau TM, Lord SE, Seibring AR, Corsini EA, Viders JC, Lakhani SR. A multimedia psychosocial support program for couples receiving infertility treatment: a feasibility study. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(3):532–538. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.08.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hansson M, Bodlund O, Chotai J. Patient education and group counselling to improve the treatment of depression in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. J Affect Disord. 2008;105(1-3):235–240. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Emery M, Beran MD, Darwish J, Oppizzi L, Joris V, Capel R, et al. Does counselling prior to IVF affect anxiety and depression scores.Preliminary results of randomised control trial? Hum Reprod. 2001;16(Suppl 1):201–201. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Thorn P. Infertility counselling: alleviating the emotional burden of infertility and infertility treatment. Int J Fertil Steril. 2009;3(1):1–4. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Thorn P. Understanding infertility: psychological and social considerations from a counselling perspective. Int J Fertil Steril. 2009;3(2):48–51. [Google Scholar]
- 48.de Liz TM, Strauss B. Differential efficacy of group and individual/couple psychotherapy with infertile patients. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(5):1324–1332. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Terzioglu F. Investigation into effectiveness of counseling on assisted reproductive techniques in Turkey. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;22(3):133–141. doi: 10.3109/01674820109049965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]