Abstract
Degradation of the M phase cyclins triggers the exit from M phase. Cdc14 is the major phosphatase required for the exit from the M phase. One of the functions of Cdc14 is to dephosphorylate and activate the Cdh1/APC/C complex, resulting in the degradation of the M phase cyclins. However, other crucial targets of Cdc14 for mitosis and cytokinesis remain to be elucidated. Here we systematically analyzed the positions of dephosphorylation sites for Cdc14 in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Quantitative mass spectrometry identified a total of 835 dephosphorylation sites on 455 potential Cdc14 substrates in vivo. We validated two events, and through functional studies we discovered that Cdc14-mediated dephosphorylation of Smc4 and Bud3 is essential for proper mitosis and cytokinesis, respectively. These results provide insight into the Cdc14-mediated pathways for exiting the M phase.
All cells proliferate following a fixed, highly coordinated cycle. Mitosis especially requires elaborate coordination for proper chromosome segregation, mitotic spindle disassembly, and cytokinesis. Much of this activity is facilitated by numerous, diverse phosphorylation and dephosphorylation signals that orchestrate the precise progression of M phase.
Prior to mitosis, sister chromatids resulting from DNA replication during S phase are held together by the cohesion complex. Then, during prophase, chromosomes are condensed by the condensin (Smc2/4) complex (1) and microtubules are remodeled to form the mitotic spindle (2). Subsequently, in metaphase, the microtubules of the spindle apparatus attach to the chromosome kinetochores (3) and dissolution of the sister chromatids is triggered by the separase-mediated cleavage of cohesin (4, 5). Finally, Cdc14, Cdh1, and APC/C work together in telophase to degrade the M phase cyclins (6), promote decondensation of chromosomes (7), and finish cytokinesis (8, 9).
Cdc14, a dual-specificity phosphatase that removes the phosphate group on both phosphotyrosine and phosphoserine/threonine residues (10), is required for mitosis (11, 12). Specifically, Cdc14 function is essential in late M phase: cells carrying a defective mutation arrest in telophase (13), whereas overexpression of Cdc14 results in G1 arrest (12). Cdc14 triggers mitotic cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)1 inactivation, enabling cells to exit mitosis through dephosphorylation and activation of the inhibitors of CDKs. At interphase, Cdc14 is a subunit of the mitotic exit network (14–17), which usually localizes to the nucleolus. However, the Cdc14 early anaphase release network initiates the release of Cdc14 from its inhibitor, Net1/Cfi1 (18), and the mitotic exit network promotes further release of Cdc14 from its inhibitor, allowing it to spread into the nucleus and cytoplasm, where it dephosphorylates its major targets (8, 9), leading to exit from mitosis. In addition to this essential role in late M phrase, Cdc14 substrates have also been identified in other stages of the cell cycle (19).
Cdc14 putatively regulates 27 proteins (19–22). Some studies have documented the substrates of Cdc14 via in vitro phosphatase assay, whereas others have provided in vivo evidence. However, dephosphorylation sites have been identified for only five of the target proteins (17, 22–25), suggesting that spurious relationships cannot be ruled out. Also, experiments have not been carried out to demonstrate whether these modifications entail direct or indirect regulation. Therefore, our understanding of Cdc14 function and regulation during mitosis in metazoans is incomplete. Conceivably, Cdc14 may regulate many more substrates involved in aspects of chromosome condensation and cytokinesis. To examine this possibility we performed a systematic phosphoproteomic screen to identify new in vivo pathways regulated by Cdc14. Using this approach, we identified both known and potentially novel substrates of Cdc14, as well as their dephosphorylation sites. Many potentially novel substrates are physically associated with Cdc14 in public databases. We also provide biochemical evidence for direct dephosphorylation of the substrates, characterize the specificity of dephosphorylation in two substrates, Smc4 and Bud3, and further study their regulation and critical role in mitosis and cytokinesis.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Yeast Strains and Plasmids
All yeast operations were performed using standard methods. Strains used in this study are listed in supplemental Table S1. Strains were constructed and analyzed via standard genetic methods. Cells were grown in rich medium (YEPD: 1% yeast extract, 2% bacto-peptone, 2% dextrose) or, for plasmid selection, in synthetic complete medium (0.67% yeast nitrogen base; 2% glucose, raffinose, or galactose). S288C and cdc28-4 (26) strains were used to detect phosphorylation and Y300 and cdc14-1 strains were used to detect dephosphorylation in vivo. CDC14, BUD3, and SMC4 were PCR-amplified and cloned into pRS306. Point mutations were introduced into plasmids using QuickChange site-directed mutagenesis (Stratagene, Santa Clara, CA). The cdc14-1 strain was constructed by insertion of pRS306-cdc14-D323G following 5-FOA-resistant selection. To generate chromosomal mutations of BUD3 and SMC4, pRS306-bud3 and pRS306-smc4 were linearized by EcoRI and HpaI, respectively, and transformed into the wild-type cells. The URA3 pop-out mutants were selected from the 5-FOA-resistant transformants. The mutations were checked by PCR and sequencing. pGH-bud3Cter (1534–1636) was constructed by ligating the BamHI/XhoI-treated fragment containing amino acids 1534–1636 of Bud3 into the BamHI/XhoI-digested pGH. Details of plasmid constructions are available upon request. Chromosomal tagging was constructed as previously described (27, 28).
Gel-assisted Digestion
Protein samples from yeast were subjected to gel-assisted digestion (29, 30). Samples were fixed into a gel directly in the Eppendorf vial with acrylamide/bisacrylamide solution (40%, v/v, 29:1), 10% (w/v) ammonium persulfate, 100% N,N,N′,N′-tetramethylenediamine in a 14:5:0.7:0.3 ratio (v/v). The gel was cut into small pieces, washed several times with 25 mm triethylammonium bicarbonate containing 50% (v/v) ceric ammonium nitrate (CAN), further dehydrated with 100% CAN, and completely dried by vacuum centrifugation. Trypsin was then added into gels for proteolytic digestion (protein:trypsin = 50:1, g/g) in 25 mm triethylammonium bicarbonate with overnight incubation at 37 °C. Digested peptides were extracted three times with 5% (v/v) formic acid in 50% (v/v) acetonitrile for 30 min and completely dried by vacuum centrifugation at room temperature.
Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography Procedure
Phosphopeptide purification was performed using an immobilized metal affinity chromatography protocol (31). First, the column was capped at one end with a 0.5-μm frit disk enclosed in a stainless steel column-end fitting. The nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid resin from the spin column (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) was packed into a 10-cm microcolumn (500-μm inner diameter PEEK column, Upchurch Scientific/Rheodyne, Oak Harbor, WA). Automated purification of phosphopeptides was performed using an Ultra-Performance LCTM system (Waters Corp., Milford, MA) with the flow rate at 13 μl/min. First, the Ni2+ ions were removed with 100 μl 50 mm EDTA in 1 m NaCl. The nitrilotriacetic acid resin was activated by 100 μl 0.2 m FeCl3 and equilibrated with loading buffer for 15 min before sample loading. The loading/condition buffer was 6% (v/v) acetic acid (pH 3.0). The peptide samples from trypsin digestion were reconstituted in loading buffer and loaded into an activated immobilized metal affinity chromatography column pre-equilibrated with the same loading buffer for 12 min. The unbound peptides were then removed with 100 μl washing solution consisting of 75% (v/v) loading buffer and 25% (v/v) acetonitrile, followed by equilibration with loading buffer for 15 min. Finally, the bound peptides were eluted with 100 μl of 200 mm NH4H2PO4 (pH 4.4). Eluted peptide samples were dried and reconstituted in 0.1% (v/v) TFA (40 μl) for further desalting and concentration using ZipTipsTM (Millipore, Bedford, CA).
LC-MS/MS Analysis
Purified phosphopeptides were reconstituted in buffer A (0.1% formic acid in H2O) and analyzed on an LTQ-Orbitrap (Thermo Electron, Bremen, Germany) in triplicate. For LTQ-Orbitrap analysis, LC-MS/MS was performed on an Agilent 1100 series HPLC (Agilent, Waldbronn, Germany) with a micro-T for flow splitting connected to an LTQ-Orbitrap XL hybrid mass spectrometer. Peptides were loaded onto a 25 cm × 75 μm fused-silica capillary column packed in-house with C18 gel (5 μm, Nucleosil 120–5 C18, Macherey-Nagel, GmbH & Co. KG, Düren, Germany) and separated using a segmented gradient over 100 min from 2% to 80% buffer B. Survey full-scan MS spectra were acquired in the Orbitrap (m/z 350–1600) with the resolution set to 60,000 at m/z 400 and the automatic gain control target at 106. The 10 most intense ions were sequentially isolated for collision-induced dissociation MS/MS fragmentation and detection in the linear ion trap (automatic gain control target at 7000) with previously selected ions dynamically excluded for 90 s. To improve the fragmentation spectra of the phosphopeptides, “multistage activation” at 97.97, 48.99, and 32.66 Thompson (Th) relative to the precursor ion was enabled in all MS/MS events. All the measurements in the Orbitrap were performed with the lock mass option for internal calibration.
Database Search
Raw MS/MS data from the LTQ-Orbitrap were transformed to msm files using the software RAW2MSM (version 1.1) (32). The msm files were searched using Mascot (version 2.2.1) against the Swiss-Prot Saccharomyces cerevisiae (baker's yeast) database (version 54.2, 6493 sequences) with the following exceptions: only tryptic peptides with up to two missed cleavage sites were allowed, the fragment ion mass tolerance was set at 10 ppm, and the parent ion tolerance was set at 0.6 Da. Phosphorylation (STY) and oxidation (M) were specified as variable modifications. Peptides were considered identified if their Mascot individual ion score was greater than 20 (p < 0.05). The false discovery rates for Orbitrap data were determined with a Mascot score greater than 20 (p < 0.05) in this study. All of the raw datasets, peak lists, spectra of identified phosphopeptides, and identification results have been deposited in the ProteomeXchange Consortium (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org) via the PRIDE partner repository (33) with the dataset identifier PXD000375 and DOI 10.6019/PXD000375.
Quantitative Analysis by IDEAL-Q
The quantitative analysis of phosphopeptides was performed with the SEMI label-free algorithm (34) and IDEAL-Q software (35). The raw data files acquired from the LTQ-Orbitrap were converted into files of mzXML format by the program ReAdW (XCalibur, Thermo Finnigan), and the search results in MASCOT were exported in Extensible Markup Language data (.xml) format. After data conversion, the confident peptide identification results (p < 0.05) from each LC-MS/MS run were loaded and merged to establish a global peptide information list (sequence, elution time, and mass-to-charge ratio). Alignment of elution time was then performed based on the peptide information list using linear regression in different LC-MS/MS runs followed by correction of aberrational chromatographic shifts across fragmental elution-time domains. To increase correct assignment, the detected peptide peaks were validated by means of SCI validation using three criteria: (i) signal-to-noise ratio > 3, (ii) accurate charge state, and (iii) correct isotope pattern. To calculate the relative peptide abundance, the tool performs reconstruction of extracted ion chromatography and calculates the area of the extracted ion chromatograph. The fold-change of a given peptide was calculated based on the ratio of relative peptide abundance between different samples. Finally, the quantitation result for each phosphopeptide was manually checked. The analysis of identified peptides is presented in supplemental Tables S2 and S3.
Gene Ontology Analysis
Gene Ontology analysis was conducted using an online tool available at the Saccharomyces Genome Database website (version 8.03) (36). The default parameter settings were used and analyzed on October 3, 2013, using the “calculate false discovery rate” option for multiple hypothesis correction. The Bonferroni correction value was calculated using Generic GO Term Finder (with default options).
Generation of Phospho-specific Antibodies
Peptides were designed as indicated: RRLELLQLSPPVKNSR for phosphorylation of Smc4 residue S128; epiwvsppskidfad and qkdepiwvsppskid for phosphorylation of Bud3 residue S1549; and rtkaltpperntvpl and lsrrtkaltppernt for phosphorylation of Bud3 residue T1566. A cysteine residue was added to the C terminus to facilitate conjugation with a carrier protein for greater immunogenicity. To generate antibodies, rabbits were boosted with carrier-conjugated phosphopeptides once per month. Pre-immune serums were collected before boost. Injection was conducted every 4 weeks, and blood samples were collected every 2 weeks. Blood samples were incubated at 37 °C for 30 min, and serum and blood cells were separated via high-speed centrifugation. Clarified serum was incubated at 56 °C for 30 min to remove complements. The specificity of antibodies was verified by means of peptide dot blot analysis.
Protein Analysis
Whole cell proteins were extracted via trichloroacetic acid precipitation and resolved via sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Smc4 was detected with a Myc antibody (Roche) and the phospho-antibody, and Bud3 was detected with an HA antibody (Covance, Princeton, NJ, monoclonal antibody, HA.11) and the phospho-antibody. Cells were also stained with propidium iodide, and the cell cycle analysis was performed using a flow cytometer (FACSCalibur 200, BD Biosciences). Recombinant proteins were overexpressed in E. coli BL21 pLys strains and purified using glutathione Sepharose beads. Proteins were eluted by elution buffer (50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 20 mm reduced glutathione, and 10% glycerol). The bound GST-fusion proteins were detected by means of Coomassie Blue staining.
In Vitro Kinase and Phosphatase Assays
Log phase cells were lysed and immunoprecipitated via incubation with an HA antibody (Covance, monoclonal antibody, HA.11) and protein G beads (Thermo). The immunoprecipitation-kinase assay was performed as described elsewhere (37). Cdc28-HA or the kinase-dead Cdc28K40L-HA were purified from a protease-deficient strain, BJ2168, carrying plasmid pKB174 (CDC28-HA) or pKB173 (cdc28K40L-HA), kindly provided by Dr. Katsunori Sugimoto. After immunoprecipitation-kinase assay, phosphorylated Bud3 and Smc4 were desalted and changed to phosphatase buffer by Microcon 10K (Millipore) for further phosphatase assay as described elsewhere (22).
Yeast Two-hybrid
β-galactosidase assays were performed as modified from Miller's protocol (38, 39). pEG202-LexA-CLB2, pJG4–5-bud3Cter, and their derivatives were transformed into strain EGY191. The final A600 of the cell cultures was measured before cells were collected for β-galactosidase assays. Cells were suspended in 1 ml of Z buffer with 50 μl of chloroform and 20 μl of 0.1% SDS. 200 μl of o-nitrophenyl-β-d-galactoside (4 mg/ml in Z buffer) were added, and the solution was mixed and kept at 28 °C. Once the reaction mixture turned yellow, 400 μl of 1 m Na2CO3 was added to stop the reaction. The reaction mixture was microfuged, and the A420 of the supernatant was measured. β-galactosidase units were calculated as follows:
![]() |
where t is the reaction time in minutes and V is the volume of culture assayed in milliliters.
Quantitative Fluorescence Microscopy
Cells were cultured in YEPD medium for 20 h, washed by sterilized water, and stained with Calcofluor (Sigma-Aldrich) as described elsewhere (40). Calcofluor binds the chitin ring at the bud scar, which is retained on the mother cells after budding. Cells with three or more bud scars were scored for budding pattern under microscopy with UV excitation. At least 300 cells were scored for each strain. Induction and detection of GFP–Clb2 fusion protein were performed as described elsewhere (41).
Immunoprecipitation
Immunoprecipitation was performed as described (42) using EBX buffer (100 mm KCl, 50 mm HEPES-KOH (pH 7.5), 2.5 mm MgCl2, 50 mm NaF, 5 mm Na4P2O7, 0.1 mm NaVO3, 0.25% Triton X-100) containing Complete protease inhibitors (Roche). Cell lysates were incubated for 2 h at 4 °C with anti-HA antibodies (Covance, monoclonal antibody, HA.11) and protein G beads (Thermo). The beads were washed three times with 1 ml of EBX. Proteins bound to antibodies were eluted in 50 μl of SDS-PAGE loading buffer.
Chromatin Fractionation
Cell lysates were fractionated into chromatin fractions according to Bilsland's protocol (43). Cells from 100 ml of logarithmically growing cultures were harvested via centrifugation, resuspended in buffer A (100 mm HEPES pH 8, 25 mm DTT), and incubated at 30 °C for 10 min. Cells were centrifuged and resuspended in buffer B (0.6 m sorbitol, 25 mm Tris pH 7.4, 4 mg/ml Zymolyase 20T, in yeast extract–peptone–dextrose medium plus adenine). Suspensions were incubated for a further 40 min at 30 °C. Spheroplasts were centrifuged at 2000 × g for 3 min and gently resuspended in buffer C (0.7 m sorbitol, 25 mm Tris pH 7.4, in yeast extract–peptone–dextrose medium plus adenine). Spheroplasts were allowed to recover at 30 °C for 15 min. Spheroplasts were centrifuged at 2000 × g for 3 min and washed in lysis buffer (0.4 m sorbitol, 150 mm KAc, 2 mm MgAc, 20 mm HEPES pH 6.8, protease inhibitors). Spheroplasts were chilled, washed in lysis buffer, and resuspended in 400 μl of lysis buffer. Triton X-100 was added to a final concentration of 1% to lyse the spheroplasts. The lysates were centrifuged at 4 °C and 20,000 × g for 15 min. Pellets (chromatin fraction) were washed three times in 1 ml of lysis buffer and resuspended in SDS-PAGE loading buffer.
RESULTS
Large-scale Identification of Potential Substrates of Cdc14 and Their Dephosphorylation Sites
To identify Cdc14-mediated dephosphorylation sites globally, we cultured G2/M arrested wild-type and cdc14-1 temperature-sensitive mutant yeast cells at a permissive temperature (23 °C) and then shifted them to a nonpermissive temperature (37 °C). We collected whole cell extracts that we proteolytically digested with trypsin and passed through a homemade immobilized metal affinity column (31) for phosphopeptide purification. The purified phosphopeptide samples were reconstituted in buffer and analyzed via liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for quantitative phosphoproteomics.
We collected 8484 MS/MS spectra, of which 5062 were successfully matched to phosphopeptide sequences (p < 0.05). In total, 3641 different phosphorylation sites were confidently assigned to 1243 proteins. The log2 cdc14-1/CDC14 ratios (i.e. fold-change of expression in response to mutation) for phosphopeptides and phosphoproteins were broadly distributed (Fig. 1A). A rightward shift in the cdc14-1/CDC14 ratio of phosphopeptides indicated that the abundance of phosphopeptides increased when Cdc14 activity was inhibited, which is in agreement with the property of a phosphatase. It also demonstrated that Cdc14 is a major phosphatase in the cell cycle. To identify potential Cdc14 substrates, we filtered the cdc14-1/CDC14 ratio with a threshold of 2-fold determined from the technical replicate (34). A total of 835 dephosphorylation sites on 455 potential Cdc14 substrates showed a >2-fold increase in cdc14-1 cells in vivo (Fig. 1B). A gene ontology analysis of the candidate substrates revealed a strong enrichment for cell-cycle-related functional categories (such as GO:0007049, Cell Cycle; hypergeometric p value < 10−14) (supplemental Table S4 and supplemental Fig. S1). At the stage of mitotic exit, Cdc14 tends to trigger mitotic exit by reversal of M phase kinase-mediated phosphorylation (12). We therefore compared the phosphorylation motifs of these phosphopeptides to find consensus sequences of Cdk1, Ipl1 (aurora), and Cdc5 (polo-like) (three major M phase kinases) consensus sequences (Fig. 1B), and many phosphopeptides indeed displayed the consensus of these kinases. Consistently, an enhancement of subunits in several pathways (especially the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways) containing Cdc14 co-purified proteins (44) was observed (Fig. 2), suggesting that these phosphoproteins may be the direct in vivo substrates of Cdc14.
Fig. 1.
Large-scale identification of Cdc14 substrates in vivo. A, distributions of log2 cdc14-1/CDC14 ratios for phosphopeptides (blue) and phosphoproteins (red). B, Venn diagrams represent the number of proteins and unique phosphorylation sites identified in this experiment. The black square indicates the total number of phosphorylation sites and proteins. The red rectangle indicates phosphopeptides and proteins that increased in abundance by over 50% (log2 > 1), and the blue rectangle indicates phosphopeptides and proteins that decreased in abundance by over 50% (log2 < −1). The green oval indicates phosphopeptides and proteins containing a consensus motif of Cdk1 (65), the orange oval indicates phosphopeptides and proteins containing a consensus motif of Ipl1 (66), and the gray oval indicates phosphopeptides and proteins containing a consensus motif of Cdc5 (67).
Fig. 2.
Cdc14-dephosphorylated candidates overlap with factors co-purified with Cdc14 in four MAPK pathways. Blue stars indicate previously reported proteins that co-purified with Cdc14 (44). Red and green colors indicate enriched (log2 (cdc14-1/CDC14) > 1) and reduced (log2 (cdc14-1/CDC14) < −1) phospho-proteins in this study, respectively.
Smc4 Is Dephosphorylated by Cdc14
To validate our approach, two candidates important for mitosis and cytokinesis were chosen for further study. Chromosome condensation, which is facilitated by the condensin complex, Smc2/4, begins at the start of M phase, and chromosome decondensation is evident by telophase (45). Mass spectrometry analysis identified Smc4 as a potential Cdc14 substrate (supplemental Fig. S2 and supplemental Table S3). The condensin complex is required for the compaction of the long interphase DNA fibers into smaller units, which in turn facilitates segregation of the chromosomes during anaphase. In fission yeast, Cdk1-mediated Smc4 phosphorylation is required for nuclear localization of the condensin complex (46). We conducted an in vitro kinase assay and found that the budding yeast Smc4 was directly phosphorylated by Cdk1 (Fig. 3A). According to our mass data, serine 128 (over 3-fold increase in cdc14-1) is a potential phosphorylation site (supplemental Fig. S2 and supplemental Table S3). Indeed, replacement of the serine 128 with alanine prevented phosphorylation in an in vitro kinase assay (Fig. 3A). We conducted an in vitro phosphatase assay (10) to demonstrate that phosphorylated Smc4 is dephosphorylated in a Cdc14-concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 3B). These results suggest that Smc4 is phosphorylated by Cdk1 and dephosphorylated by Cdc14 at S128. We next generated phospho-specific antibodies against S128 of Smc4 (Fig. 3C). The signal of phosphorylation of Smc4 was decreased in the cdk1 temperature-sensitive strain and elevated in the cdc14 temperature-sensitive strain (Figs. 3D and 3E), suggesting that Cdk1 and Cdc14 modify Smc4 in vivo. The expression of Smc4 began at S phase and decreased at late M phase, and the signal of phosphorylation of S128 of Smc4 approached the maximum at G2/M phase (Fig. 3F and supplemental Fig. S3). Together these results indicate that Smc4 is phosphorylated by Cdk1 during early mitosis and then dephosphorylated by Cdc14 at late M phase.
Fig. 3.
Smc4 is regulated by Cdk1 and Cdc14 in vitro and in vivo. A, Cdk1-mediated phosphorylation of Smc4 in vitro. Cdk1-HA and the kinase-dead cdk1K40L-HA were purified via immunoprecipitation with an HA antibody. Immunoprecipitated kinases were analyzed via SDS-PAGE and Western blot with an HA antibody. GST-Smc4 and GST alone were subjected to the immunoprecipitation-kinase assay as described (68). The gel was also stained by Coomassie Blue (CB). S128 is phosphorylated by Cdk1 in vitro. GST-Smc4 and mutants were subjected to the immunoprecipitation-kinase assay. B, Cdc14-mediated dephosphorylation of Smc4 in vitro. GST-Cdc14 and Cdc14-phosphatase dead were purified. Smc4 was phosphorylated by Cdk1 as described in A, followed by phosphatase treatment with or without the phosphatase inhibitor (22). λ Phosphatase was used as a control. The relative intensities after normalization are shown below. C, phospho-specific antibody against S128. Phospho- and nonphospho-peptides (left) and lysates (right) were subjected to dot blot and Western blot analyses, respectively, using phospho-specific antibodies from immunized rabbits. D, Cdk1-dependent phosphorylation of Smc4 in vivo. Wild-type (+) and cdk1(cdc28-4) (−) strains were synchronized by nocodazole at 23 °C and shifted to 37 °C for 3 h. Lysates were subjected to Western blot analysis. E, Cdc14-dependent dephosphorylation of Smc4 in vivo. Wild-type (+) and cdc14-1 (−) strains were synchronized by nocodazole at 23 °C and shifted to 37 °C for 3 h. Lysates were subjected to Western blot analysis. F, the phosphorylation of Smc4 is cell cycle dependent. Overnight culture was grown to early log phase in yeast peptone dextrose, arrested at G1 by α-factor, and released into cell cycle. A second cell cycle was prevented by the addition of α-factor at 75 min. Cells were collected at 15-min intervals for 135 min, and Smc4 phosphorylation was analyzed via Western blot analysis.
Phosphorylation of Smc4 at S128 Is Required for Chromosome Condensation and Chromosome Segregation
Gross defects in chromosome segregation and condensation were observed in S. cerevisiae condensin mutants (7, 47–50). In an attempt to understand the role of phosphorylation of Smc4 at S128, we asynchronously grew smc4 mutants including smc4 S128A and smc4 S128D and then microscopically monitored their DNA morphology. As anticipated, we observed an increase in unsegregated and missegregated nuclei in smc4 S128A mutants (Fig. 4A). Next, we assessed condensin function in smc4 S128A and smc4 S128D cells using the LacO/LacR-GFP system, which has been developed to determine the functionality of the chromosome condensation pathway (51). Using two sets of LacO repeats spaced 450 kb apart on the right arm of chromosome IV, this system directly detects chromosome condensation at M phase. Condensin participates in the maintenance of cohesion, and inappropriate chromosome condensation and cohesion lead to multiple green dots (51). We synchronized wild-type, smc4 S128A, and smc4 S128D strains at G1 and released them into the cell cycle. Sixty minutes after release, when most cells enter the G2/M phase (supplemental Fig. S3A), 43.7% of wild-type cells contained a single dot indicating cells with condensed chromosomes, and 1.3% contained multiple dots. In contrast, smc4 S128A cells showed a decreased proportion of large-budded cells containing one dot (16.7%) and a dramatic increase in cells containing multiple dots (22.3%) (Figs. 4B and 4C). These data revealed that phosphorylation of Smc4 at S128 is required for adequate chromosome condensation.
Fig. 4.
Smc4 S128 phosphorylation influences nucleus segregation and chromosome condensation. A, cell cycle stage (200 cells scored) of phospho-(D) and dephospho-(A)-mimicking mutants compared with wild-type cells. Asynchronous cultures were stained with DAPI, and the cell cycle stage was scored under the microscope. A total of 200 cells were scored for each strain. B, images of wild-type and mutant cells with LacO repeats integrated at TRP1 and LYS4 and expressing LacR-GFP (51) were captured at 60 min after release from α-factor at 30 °C (bar, 5 μm). C, large-budded G2/M-phase cells were calculated and a total of 200 cells were scored for each strain. D, extracts from indicated strains were precipitated by an anti-HA antibody. Immunoprecipitated Brn1 was probed with an anti-HA antibody and co-immunoprecipitated. Smc4 was probed with an anti-Myc antibody. E, cultures were grown to log phase and fractionated into chromatin associated proteins. Fractions were analyzed via Western blot analysis using antibodies against Myc (Smc4) and HA (Brn1). Histone H2A was used as a loading control.
Given that S128 is located near the potential non-Smc subunit interaction domain of Smc4 (47), we asked whether the phosphorylation on S128 of Smc4 modulates the Smc4–Brn1 interaction. Co-immunoprecipitation assay did not detect any obvious difference between wild-type and mutant smc4 cells in the Smc4–Brn1 interaction (Fig. 4D). Instead, the loading of Smc4 and Brn1 to chromatin was reduced in the smc4 S128A mutant (Fig. 4E). These results suggest that phosphorylation of Smc4 at S128 is required for the loading of condensin to chromatin.
Bud3 Is Dephosphorylated by Cdc14
In the budding yeast S. cerevisiae, the site of cytokinesis is marked at the time of budding. Our mass spectrometry analysis identified Bud3 as another potential substrate of Cdc14 (supplemental Fig. S4 and supplemental Table S3). Cdc14 localizes to the bud neck at late mitosis (52). In agreement with this, Bud3 moves to the bud neck at the G2/M phase (53). Bud3 is required for cells to mark the site for axial budding in the next cell cycle (53) and is critical to target M phase cyclin Clb2 to the bud neck to modulate the timing of cytokinesis (41, 54). We therefore examined whether Bud3 is directly phosphorylated by Cdk1 using an in vitro kinase assay (Fig. 5A). Both serine 1549 (over 3-fold increase in cdc14-1) and threonine 1566 (over 16-fold increase in cdc14-1) were identified as phosphorylation sites of Bud3 in our mass data (supplemental Fig. S4 and supplemental Table S3). Accordingly, double mutations at S1549 and T1566A caused a reduction of phosphorylation in vitro (Fig. 5B). An in vitro phosphatase assay (10) demonstrated a Cdc14-dependent dephosphorylation in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 5C). Our data suggest that Cdk1 phosphorylates Bud3 at amino acids 1549 and 1566 and Cdc14 dephosphorylates these two sites. We further generated phospho-specific antibodies against S1549 and T1566 of Bud3 (Fig. 5D). Phospho-antibodies indeed detected a defect in Bud3 phosphorylation/dephosphorylation in cdk1 and cdc14 temperature-sensitive strains, respectively (Figs. 5E and 5F), suggesting that Cdk1 and Cdc14 modulate Bud3 function in vivo. The phosphorylation of S1549 and T1566 was observed at M phase (Fig. 5G and supplemental Fig. S5). Together these results indicate that direct phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of Bud3 by Cdk1/Cdc14 regulates the functions of Bud3.
Fig. 5.
Bud3 is regulated by Cdk1 and Cdc14 in vitro and in vivo. A, Cdk1-mediated phosphorylation of Bud3 in vitro. Cdk1-HA and the kinase-dead cdk1K40L-HA were purified by immunoprecipitation with an HA antibody. Immunoprecipitated kinases were analyzed via SDS-PAGE and Western blot with the HA antibody. GST-Bud3 and GST alone were subjected to the immunoprecipitation-kinase assay as described (68). The kinase reactions were also Coomassie stained (CB). B, S1549 and T1566 are phosphorylated by Cdk1 in vitro. GST-Bud3 and mutants were subjected to the immunoprecipitation-kinase assay. The relative intensities after being normalized are shown below. C, Cdc14-mediated dephosphorylation of Bud3 in vitro. GST-Cdc14 and Cdc14-phosphatase dead were purified. Bud3 was phosphorylated by Cdk1 as described in A, followed by phosphatase treatment with or without the phosphatase inhibitor (22). λ Phosphatase was used as a control. The relative intensities after normalization are shown below. D, phospho-specific antibodies against S1549 and T1566. Phospho-peptides pretreated with or without λ phosphatase (top) and lysates (bottom) were subjected to dot blot and Western blot analyses, respectively, using phospho-specific antibodies. E, Cdk1-dependent phosphorylation of Bud3 in vivo. Wild-type (+) and cdk1 (cdc28-4) (−) strains were synchronized by nocodazole at 23 °C and shifted to 37 °C for 3 h. Lysates were subjected to Western blot analysis. 3HA-tagged Bud3 was detected by an HA antibody. F, Cdc14-dependent dephosphorylation of Bud3 in vivo. Wild-type (+) and cdc14-1 (−) strains were synchronized by nocodazole at 23 °C and shifted to 37 °C for 3 h. Lysates were subjected to Western blot analysis. G, the phosphorylation of Bud3 is cell cycle dependent. Overnight culture was grown to early log phase in yeast peptone dextrose, arrested at G1 by α-factor, and released into cell cycle. A second cell cycle was prevented by the addition of α-factor at 75 min. Cells were collected at 15-min intervals for 135 min, and Bud3 was analyzed via Western blot analysis.
Phosphorylation of Bud3 at S1549 and T1566 Is Required for Clb2 Recruitment and Swe1 Degradation
The haploid budding yeast exhibits bud scars clustered around one pole on the surface of mother cells (55). However, bud3 or bud4 mutations cause a bipolar budding phenotype (53, 56). Importantly, a single mutation at residue 1549 or 1566 to alanine caused a defect in bud scar clustering, and this phenotype was partially recovered by phospho-mimicking aspartic acid (Figs. 6A and 6B). Another mutation (S354A) at a predicted Cdk1-dependent consensus site was applied as a negative control and did not cause any defect (Fig. 6B). According to a previous report (41), the C terminus of Bud3 is critical for its interaction with Clb2 and the recruitment of Clb2 to the bud neck. A mutation at residue 1549 or 1566 to alanine caused a defect in the interaction with Clb2 in the yeast two-hybrid assay (Fig. 6C). Western blot analysis indicated that the reduction in the Bud3–Clb2 interaction was not due to different expression levels of Bud3 or Clb2 in the two-hybrid system (Fig. 6D). This reduced interaction further impeded the recruitment of GFP-Clb2 (Fig. 6E). Conversely, the Bud3–Clb2 interaction and bud neck localization of GFP-Clb2 were recovered with the phospho-mimicking aspartic acid mutation (Figs. 6C and 6E).
Fig. 6.
Bud3 phosphorylation regulates Clb2 localization and Swe1 degradation. A, cell walls of indicated yeast strains were stained with Calcofluor white and observed under a microscope. The percentage of abnormal bipolar cells is scored in B. bud3- and bud4-deleted strains were used as positive controls. C, two-hybrid assay was used to detect the Bud3–Clb2 interaction. D, Western blot analysis was conducted to examine the expression levels using antibodies against HA (Bud3) and LexA (Clb2). Pgk1 is a loading control. E, localization of the GFP-Clb2 fusion protein in indicted strains. Bud neck staining of Bud3 in large budded cells was observed under a microscope and counted. At least 200 cells were counted for each strain. F, BUD3 SWE1–3HA, bud3 S1549T1566A SWE1–3HA, and bud3 S1549T1566D SWE1–3HA cells were arrested in G1 by α-factor and released. Cells were taken at the indicated time points to determine Swe1 expression using anti-HA and anti-Pgk1 (loading control) antibodies.
Swe1 (Saccharomyces wee1 homologue) inhibits mitotic Cdk1 activity by phosphorylating tyrosine 19 of Cdk1 (57). Thus, timely mitotic entry requires the inactivation of Swe1. Swe1 is localized to the bud neck (58). The Cdk1–Clb2 complex directly phosphorylates Swe1, and this modification serves as a priming step to promote subsequent Swe1 hyperphosphorylation and degradation (59). Because Bud3 controls the bud neck recruitment of Clb2, which may lead to Swe1 phosphorylation and degradation, we next examined whether Cdk1/Cdc14-mediated modification of Bud3 influences the Swe1 degradation. As shown in Fig. 6F, mutations at residues 1549 and 1566 to alanine caused a defect in Swe1 degradation, suggesting that reduced phosphorylation on Bud3 compromises Clb2 recruitment and further inhibits Swe1 degradation.
DISCUSSION
Within a cell cycle, multiple events need to be well coordinated. At the M phase, chromosome condensation, mitosis, and cytokinesis occur sequentially to guarantee precise entry and exit of the M phase. A few master regulators may control numerous signals, and Cdc14 seems to play such a role. Pinpointing the dephosphorylated residues for Cdc14 is essential for understanding its functions and detailed mechanisms. The identification of dephosphorylation sites provides the ultimate proof that the putative substrate is indeed dephosphorylated. In this study, we identified 455 potential Cdc14 substrates, and the majority of them are critical for M phase progression, confirming the master role of Cdc14 at M phase. Additionally, Cdc14 displays connections with many MAPK pathways. Cdc14 interacts with the pheromone and filamentous growth pathway MAPK Ste7 and the PKC pathway MAPKKK Bck1, and increases in the phosphorylation of Ste7 and Bck1 were observed in cdc14-1 cells (44). These results indicate that Ste7 and Bck1 may be direct targets of Cdc14 and that Cdc14 may serve as a hub for multiple environmental response signals.
To validate this broad screen, we demonstrated that two candidates, Smc4 and Bud3, are indeed Cdc14 direct substrates. Smc4 is the major component of condensin and is required for chromosome condensation. Our study demonstrated that the phosphorylation status of Smc4 S128 is critical for condensin function (Fig. 7). This phosphorylation does not control the interaction between Smc4 and the non-Smc subunit, but it regulates the loading ability of condensin to chromatin. Bud3 is important for the budding site selection at the early M phase. Not only is Bud3 required for budding site selection, but it also recruits Clb2 to the bud neck for Cdk1-mediated Swe1 degradation and cytokinesis. Elimination of Cdk1/Cdc14-controlled regulation of Bud3 impedes Clb2 recruitment and Swe1 degradation (Fig. 7). The C terminus of Bud3 was previously shown to be critical for cytokinesis (41). In agreement with this, exit from M phase was delayed in bud3 S1549T1566A cells (supplemental Figs. S5A and S5B). The regulation of both Smc4 and Bud3 is mediated by Cdk1 and Cdc14. Abolishing either modification deregulated normal M phase progression (Fig. 4A and supplemental Fig. S5). These results indicate that a single Cdc14-mediated regulation is critical for precise cell cycle movement.
Fig. 7.
Cdk1/Cdc14-mediated stepwise mechanisms may facilitate multiple signal transmission at distinct locations in the cell. Cdc14 is thought to dephosphorylate many substrates. Gradual increase of the Cdc14 concentration at M phase instructs sequential dephosphorylation, and reversal of phosphorylation by Cdc14 regulates the temporal ordering of mitotic exit events. At S phase Cdk1 may phosphorylate Smc4 to promote the chromatin loading ability of condensin. During chromosome decondensation at telophase, dissociation between SMC complex and chromatin may be achieved by Cdc14. Cdk1 phosphorylates Bud3 to promote Clb2 localization to the bud neck. Localization of Clb2 to the bud neck induces proteolytical degradation of Swe1, a Cdk1 inhibitor, which further fully activates the Cdk1/Clb2 complex. Activated Cdk1 finally facilitates septin ring formation at the neck, and cytokinesis then should be the ultimate event that completes the exit from M phase (69, 70).
Cdc14 is thought to dephosphorylate many substrates, and indeed many potential substrates were identified in our study (supplemental Table S5). Cdh1 is the best-known substrate of Cdc14 and is activated through Cdc14-dependent dephosphorylation (23, 60). In our screen, we did not identify Cdh1. The exact Cdc14 dephosphorylation site on Cdh1 has not been mapped yet. Our approach was based on mass spectrometry analysis of trypsin-digested fragments. It is possible that the Cdc14 dephosphorylated site is located on a trypsin-digested fragment of Cdh1 greater than 35 amino acids, which is beyond the detection ability of the mass instrument (61, 62).
Our study globally identified Cdc14 substrates. Among all these potential substrates, many are well conserved in higher organisms. For example, minichromosome maintenance 2–7 proteins play a pivotal helicase role in DNA replication in eukaryotic organisms. Upon entry into S-phase, several subunits of the MCM hexameric complex are phosphorylated by CDK (63, 64). The MCM complex is highly conserved from yeast to human, and our study also identified Mcm2, Mcm3, and Mcm7 as potential Cdc14 substrates. Moreover, fine control of individual Cdc14-mediated regulation may be important in order for yeast to adapt to environmental challenges during the cell cycle in the wild and further help them to evolve. Future investigation will be required in order to understand this process.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We greatly appreciate Dr. Marie-Noëlle Simon for her suggestions and comments on the manuscript. We also thank Drs. Marie-Noëlle Simon, Duncan Clarke, Katsunori Sugimoto, and Steven Reed for the gifts of yeast strains and plasmids. The proteomics analysis was performed by the Academia Sinica Common Mass Spectrometry Facilities located at the Institute of Biological Chemistry.
Footnotes
Author contributions: S.C.T., Y.J.C., and L.K. conceived and designed the experiments; L.K., Y.T.W., and Y.C.C. performed the experiments with the assistance of J.C.C. and S.F.T.; S.C.T., Y.J.C., and L.K. analyzed the data; S.C.T. wrote the paper with the assistance of Y.J.C. and L.K.
* This work was supported by grants from the National Science Council (101-2311-B-002-018-MY3), National Taiwan University (NTU CESRP-101R7602A1), and the National Health Research Institute (NHRI-EX10242BI) to S.C.T.
This article contains supplemental material.
1 The abbreviations used are:
- CDK
- cyclin-dependent kinase
- SDS-PAGE
- sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
REFERENCES
- 1. Hirano T., Mitchison T. J. (1994) A heterodimeric coiled-coil protein required for mitotic chromosome condensation in vitro. Cell 79, 449–458 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Haase S. B., Winey M., Reed S. I. (2001) Multi-step control of spindle pole body duplication by cyclin-dependent kinase. Nat. Cell Biol. 3, 38–42 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Tanaka T. U., Stark M. J., Tanaka K. (2005) Kinetochore capture and bi-orientation on the mitotic spindle. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 929–942 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Uhlmann F., Lottspeich F., Nasmyth K. (1999) Sister-chromatid separation at anaphase onset is promoted by cleavage of the cohesin subunit Scc1. Nature 400, 37–42 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Uhlmann F., Wernic D., Poupart M. A., Koonin E. V., Nasmyth K. (2000) Cleavage of cohesin by the CD clan protease separin triggers anaphase in yeast. Cell 103, 375–386 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Peters J. M. (2002) The anaphase-promoting complex: proteolysis in mitosis and beyond. Mol. Cell 9, 931–943 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Strunnikov A. V., Hogan E., Koshland D. (1995) SMC2, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene essential for chromosome segregation and condensation, defines a subgroup within the SMC family. Genes Dev. 9, 587–599 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Shou W., Seol J. H., Shevchenko A., Baskerville C., Moazed D., Chen Z. W., Jang J., Charbonneau H., Deshaies R. J. (1999) Exit from mitosis is triggered by Tem1-dependent release of the protein phosphatase Cdc14 from nucleolar RENT complex. Cell 97, 233–244 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Visintin R., Hwang E. S., Amon A. (1999) Cfi1 prevents premature exit from mitosis by anchoring Cdc14 phosphatase in the nucleolus. Nature 398, 818–823 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Taylor G. S., Liu Y., Baskerville C., Charbonneau H. (1997) The activity of Cdc14p, an oligomeric dual specificity protein phosphatase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is required for cell cycle progression. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 24054–24063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Bardin A. J., Amon A. (2001) Men and sin: what's the difference? Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 815–826 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Visintin R., Craig K., Hwang E. S., Prinz S., Tyers M., Amon A. (1998) The phosphatase Cdc14 triggers mitotic exit by reversal of Cdk-dependent phosphorylation. Mol Cell 2, 709–718 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Fitzpatrick P. J., Toyn J. H., Millar J. B., Johnston L. H. (1998) DNA replication is completed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells that lack functional Cdc14, a dual-specificity protein phosphatase. Mol. Gen. Genet. 258, 437–441 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Bardin A. J., Visintin R., Amon A. (2000) A mechanism for coupling exit from mitosis to partitioning of the nucleus. Cell 102, 21–31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Guacci V., Hogan E., Koshland D. (1994) Chromosome condensation and sister chromatid pairing in budding yeast. J. Cell Biol. 125, 517–530 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Jaspersen S. L., Charles J. F., Tinker-Kulberg R. L., Morgan D. O. (1998) A late mitotic regulatory network controlling cyclin destruction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 2803–2817 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Jaspersen S. L., Morgan D. O. (2000) Cdc14 activates cdc15 to promote mitotic exit in budding yeast. Curr. Biol. 10, 615–618 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Stegmeier F., Visintin R., Amon A. (2002) Separase, polo kinase, the kinetochore protein Slk19, and Spo12 function in a network that controls Cdc14 localization during early anaphase. Cell 108, 207–220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Akiyoshi B., Biggins S. (2010) Cdc14-dependent dephosphorylation of a kinetochore protein prior to anaphase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 186, 1487–1491 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Mocciaro A., Schiebel E. (2010) Cdc14: a highly conserved family of phosphatases with non-conserved functions? J. Cell Sci. 123, 2867–2876 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Bloom J., Cristea I. M., Procko A. L., Lubkov V., Chait B. T., Snyder M., Cross F. R. (2011) Global analysis of Cdc14 phosphatase reveals diverse roles in mitotic processes. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 5434–5445 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Zhai Y., Yung P. Y., Huo L., Liang C. (2010) Cdc14p resets the competency of replication licensing by dephosphorylating multiple initiation proteins during mitotic exit in budding yeast. J. Cell Sci. 123, 3933–3943 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Hall M. C., Jeong D. E., Henderson J. T., Choi E., Bremmer S. C., Iliuk A. B., Charbonneau H. (2008) Cdc28 and Cdc14 control stability of the anaphase-promoting complex inhibitor Acm1. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 10396–10407 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Geymonat M., Spanos A., Wells G. P., Smerdon S. J., Sedgwick S. G. (2004) Clb6/Cdc28 and Cdc14 regulate phosphorylation status and cellular localization of Swi6. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 2277–2285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Khmelinskii A., Lawrence C., Roostalu J., Schiebel E. (2007) Cdc14-regulated midzone assembly controls anaphase B. J. Cell Biol. 177, 981–993 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Lorincz A. T., Reed S. I. (1986) Sequence analysis of temperature-sensitive mutations in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene CDC28. Mol. Cell. Biol. 6, 4099–4103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Schneider B. L., Seufert W., Steiner B., Yang Q. H., Futcher A. B. (1995) Use of polymerase chain reaction epitope tagging for protein tagging in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 11, 1265–1274 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Knop M., Siegers K., Pereira G., Zachariae W., Winsor B., Nasmyth K., Schiebel E. (1999) Epitope tagging of yeast genes using a PCR-based strategy: more tags and improved practical routines. Yeast 15, 963–972 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Lu X., Zhu H. (2005) Tube-gel digestion: a novel proteomic approach for high throughput analysis of membrane proteins. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4, 1948–1958 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Han C. L., Chien C. W., Chen W. C., Chen Y. R., Wu C. P., Li H., Chen Y. J. (2008) A multiplexed quantitative strategy for membrane proteomics: opportunities for mining therapeutic targets for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 7, 1983–1997 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Tsai C. F., Wang Y. T., Chen Y. R., Lai C. Y., Lin P. Y., Pan K. T., Chen J. Y., Khoo K. H., Chen Y. J. (2008) Immobilized metal affinity chromatography revisited: pH/acid control toward high selectivity in phosphoproteomics. J. Proteome Res. 7, 4058–4069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Olsen J. V., de Godoy L. M., Li G., Macek B., Mortensen P., Pesch R., Makarov A., Lange O., Horning S., Mann M. (2005) Parts per million mass accuracy on an Orbitrap mass spectrometer via lock mass injection into a C-trap. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4, 2010–2021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Vizcaino J. A., Cote R. G., Csordas A., Dianes J. A., Fabregat A., Foster J. M., Griss J., Alpi E., Birim M., Contell J., O'Kelly G., Schoenegger A., Ovelleiro D., Perez-Riverol Y., Reisinger F., Rios D., Wang R., Hermjakob H. (2013) The PRoteomics IDEntifications (PRIDE) database and associated tools: status in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D1063–D1069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Wang Y. T., Tsai C. F., Hong T. C., Tsou C. C., Lin P. Y., Pan S. H., Hong T. M., Yang P. C., Sung T. Y., Hsu W. L., Chen Y. J. (2010) An informatics-assisted label-free quantitation strategy that depicts phosphoproteomic profiles in lung cancer cell invasion. J. Proteome Res. 9, 5582–5597 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Tsou C. C., Tsai C. F., Tsui Y. H., Sudhir P. R., Wang Y. T., Chen Y. J., Chen J. Y., Sung T. Y., Hsu W. L. (2010) IDEAL-Q, an automated tool for label-free quantitation analysis using an efficient peptide alignment approach and spectral data validation. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 9, 131–144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Boyle E. I., Weng S., Gollub J., Jin H., Botstein D., Cherry J. M., Sherlock G. (2004) GO::TermFinder—open source software for accessing Gene Ontology information and finding significantly enriched Gene Ontology terms associated with a list of genes. Bioinformatics 20, 3710–3715 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Tseng S. F., Shen Z. J., Tsai H. J., Lin Y. H., Teng S. C. (2009) Rapid Cdc13 turnover and telomere length homeostasis are controlled by Cdk1-mediated phosphorylation of Cdc13. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 3602–3611 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Guarente L. (1983) Yeast promoters and lacZ fusions designed to study expression of cloned genes in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 101, 181–191 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Miller J. H. (1972) Experiments in Molecular Genetics, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY [Google Scholar]
- 40. Pringle J. R. (1991) Staining of bud scars and other cell wall chitin with calcofluor. Methods Enzymol. 194, 732–735 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Bailly E., Cabantous S., Sondaz D., Bernadac A., Simon M. N. (2003) Differential cellular localization among mitotic cyclins from Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a new role for the axial budding protein Bud3 in targeting Clb2 to the mother-bud neck. J. Cell Sci. 116, 4119–4130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Liang C., Stillman B. (1997) Persistent initiation of DNA replication and chromatin-bound MCM proteins during the cell cycle in cdc6 mutants. Genes Dev. 11, 3375–3386 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Bilsland E., Hult M., Bell S. D., Sunnerhagen P., Downs J. A. (2007) The Bre5/Ubp3 ubiquitin protease complex from budding yeast contributes to the cellular response to DNA damage. DNA Repair 6, 1471–1484 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Breitkreutz A., Choi H., Sharom J. R., Boucher L., Neduva V., Larsen B., Lin Z. Y., Breitkreutz B. J., Stark C., Liu G., Ahn J., Dewar-Darch D., Reguly T., Tang X., Almeida R., Qin Z. S., Pawson T., Gingras A. C., Nesvizhskii A. I., Tyers M. (2010) A global protein kinase and phosphatase interaction network in yeast. Science 328, 1043–1046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Varela E., Shimada K., Laroche T., Leroy D., Gasser S. M. (2009) Lte1, Cdc14 and MEN-controlled Cdk inactivation in yeast coordinate rDNA decompaction with late telophase progression. EMBO J. 28, 1562–1575 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Sutani T., Yuasa T., Tomonaga T., Dohmae N., Takio K., Yanagida M. (1999) Fission yeast condensin complex: essential roles of non-SMC subunits for condensation and Cdc2 phosphorylation of Cut3/SMC4. Genes Dev. 13, 2271–2283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Freeman L., Aragon-Alcaide L., Strunnikov A. (2000) The condensin complex governs chromosome condensation and mitotic transmission of rDNA. J. Cell Biol. 149, 811–824 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Lavoie B. D., Hogan E., Koshland D. (2002) In vivo dissection of the chromosome condensation machinery: reversibility of condensation distinguishes contributions of condensin and cohesin. J. Cell Biol. 156, 805–815 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Lavoie B. D., Tuffo K. M., Oh S., Koshland D., Holm C. (2000) Mitotic chromosome condensation requires Brn1p, the yeast homologue of Barren. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 1293–1304 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Ouspenski I. I., Cabello O. A., Brinkley B. R. (2000) Chromosome condensation factor Brn1p is required for chromatid separation in mitosis. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 1305–1313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Vas A. C., Andrews C. A., Kirkland Matesky K., Clarke D. J. (2007) In vivo analysis of chromosome condensation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 557–568 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Bembenek J., Kang J., Kurischko C., Li B., Raab J. R., Belanger K. D., Luca F. C., Yu H. (2005) Crm1-mediated nuclear export of Cdc14 is required for the completion of cytokinesis in budding yeast. Cell Cycle 4, 961–971 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Chant J., Mischke M., Mitchell E., Herskowitz I., Pringle J. R. (1995) Role of Bud3p in producing the axial budding pattern of yeast. J. Cell Biol. 129, 767–778 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Eluere R., Offner N., Varlet I., Motteux O., Signon L., Picard A., Bailly E., Simon M. N. (2007) Compartmentalization of the functions and regulation of the mitotic cyclin Clb2 in S. cerevisiae. J. Cell Sci. 120, 702–711 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Chant J., Herskowitz I. (1991) Genetic control of bud site selection in yeast by a set of gene products that constitute a morphogenetic pathway. Cell 65, 1203–1212 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Sanders S. L., Herskowitz I. (1996) The BUD4 protein of yeast, required for axial budding, is localized to the mother/BUD neck in a cell cycle-dependent manner. J. Cell Biol. 134, 413–427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Booher R. N., Deshaies R. J., Kirschner M. W. (1993) Properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae wee1 and its differential regulation of p34CDC28 in response to G1 and G2 cyclins. EMBO J. 12, 3417–3426 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Longtine M. S., Theesfeld C. L., McMillan J. N., Weaver E., Pringle J. R., Lew D. J. (2000) Septin-dependent assembly of a cell cycle-regulatory module in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 4049–4061 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Asano S., Park J. E., Sakchaisri K., Yu L. R., Song S., Supavilai P., Veenstra T. D., Lee K. S. (2005) Concerted mechanism of Swe1/Wee1 regulation by multiple kinases in budding yeast. EMBO J. 24, 2194–2204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Jaspersen S. L., Charles J. F., Morgan D. O. (1999) Inhibitory phosphorylation of the APC regulator Hct1 is controlled by the kinase Cdc28 and the phosphatase Cdc14. Curr. Biol. 9, 227–236 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Xu H., Freitas M. A. (2009) MassMatrix: a database search program for rapid characterization of proteins and peptides from tandem mass spectrometry data. Proteomics 9, 1548–1555 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Xu H., Hsu P. H., Zhang L., Tsai M. D., Freitas M. A. (2010) Database search algorithm for identification of intact cross-links in proteins and peptides using tandem mass spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 9, 3384–3393 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Montagnoli A., Valsasina B., Brotherton D., Troiani S., Rainoldi S., Tenca P., Molinari A., Santocanale C. (2006) Identification of Mcm2 phosphorylation sites by S-phase-regulating kinases. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 10281–10290 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Moritani M., Ishimi Y. (2013) Inhibition of DNA binding of MCM2–7 complex by phosphorylation with cyclin-dependent kinases. J. Biochem. 154, 363–372 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Ubersax J. A., Woodbury E. L., Quang P. N., Paraz M., Blethrow J. D., Shah K., Shokat K. M., Morgan D. O. (2003) Targets of the cyclin-dependent kinase Cdk1. Nature 425, 859–864 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Cheeseman I. M., Anderson S., Jwa M., Green E. M., Kang J., Yates J. R., 3rd, Chan C. S., Drubin D. G., Barnes G. (2002) Phospho-regulation of kinetochore-microtubule attachments by the Aurora kinase Ipl1p. Cell 111, 163–172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Yoshida S., Kono K., Lowery D. M., Bartolini S., Yaffe M. B., Ohya Y., Pellman D. (2006) Polo-like kinase Cdc5 controls the local activation of Rho1 to promote cytokinesis. Science 313, 108–111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Tseng S. F., Lin J. J., Teng S. C. (2006) The telomerase-recruitment domain of the telomere binding protein Cdc13 is regulated by Mec1p/Tel1p-dependent phosphorylation. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, 6327–6336 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Altman R., Kellogg D. (1997) Control of mitotic events by Nap1 and the Gin4 kinase. J. Cell Biol. 138, 119–130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Li C. R., Yong J. Y., Wang Y. M., Wang Y. (2012) CDK regulates septin organization through cell-cycle-dependent phosphorylation of the Nim1-related kinase Gin4. J. Cell Sci. 125, 2533–2543 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.








