Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1984 Oct;81(19):6115–6119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.19.6115

Topological repression of gene activity by a transposable element.

H W Stokes, B G Hall
PMCID: PMC391870  PMID: 6091136

Abstract

The ebgA (evolved beta-galactosidase) gene of Escherichia coli was isolated as part of a 9.6-kilobase (kb) sequence cloned into plasmid pBR322. The position of the ebgA gene within that 9.6-kilobase sequence was identified by insertional inactivation by means of the transposon gamma-delta. In addition to the gamma-delta insertions that inactivate ebgA by disrupting the coding sequence, seven additional gamma-delta insertions reduce expression of the gene by a factor of greater than 200 by insertions elsewhere into the replicon. One of these insertions is into the pBR322 sequence itself. This action at a distance to reduce expression requires that gamma-delta is cis with respect to the ebgA gene. The effect is independent of the orientation or position of gamma-delta within the replicon, but it does depend both upon the orientation of the ebgA-bearing sequence within the replicon and upon the total size of the replicon. Transcription readthrough (promoter occlusion) does not explain this phenomenon, and we suggest that the presence of gamma-delta may alter the local supercoiling in the region of the ebgA promoter in such a way as to inhibit transcription. This repression by a transposable element appears to represent a novel mechanism for altering gene expression.

Full text

PDF
6115

Images in this article

6117Image
on p.6117

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adhya S., Gottesman M. Promoter occlusion: transcription through a promoter may inhibit its activity. Cell. 1982 Jul;29(3):939–944. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90456-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arraj J. A., Campbell J. H. Isolation and characterization of the newly evolved ebg beta-galactosidase of Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol. 1975 Nov;124(2):849–856. doi: 10.1128/jb.124.2.849-856.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bolivar F., Rodriguez R. L., Greene P. J., Betlach M. C., Heyneker H. L., Boyer H. W., Crosa J. H., Falkow S. Construction and characterization of new cloning vehicles. II. A multipurpose cloning system. Gene. 1977;2(2):95–113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DiNardo S., Voelkel K. A., Sternglanz R., Reynolds A. E., Wright A. Escherichia coli DNA topoisomerase I mutants have compensatory mutations in DNA gyrase genes. Cell. 1982 Nov;31(1):43–51. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90403-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gall B. G., Hartl D. L. Regulation of newly evolved enzymes. II. The ebg repressor. Genetics. 1975 Nov;81(3):427–435. doi: 10.1093/genetics/81.3.427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gamper H. B., Hearst J. E. A topological model for transcription based on unwinding angle analysis of E. coli RNA polymerase binary, initiation and ternary complexes. Cell. 1982 May;29(1):81–90. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90092-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Guyer M. S. The gamma delta sequence of F is an insertion sequence. J Mol Biol. 1978 Dec 15;126(3):347–365. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(78)90045-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hall B. G. Changes in the substrate specificities of an enzyme during directed evolution of new functions. Biochemistry. 1981 Jul 7;20(14):4042–4049. doi: 10.1021/bi00517a015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hall B. G., Clarke N. D. Regulation of newly evolved enzymes. III Evolution of the ebg repressor during selection for enhanced lactase activity. Genetics. 1977 Feb;85(2):193–201. doi: 10.1093/genetics/85.2.193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hall B. G. Evolution of a regulated operon in the laboratory. Genetics. 1982 Jul-Aug;101(3-4):335–344. doi: 10.1093/genetics/101.3-4.335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hall B. G. Experimental evolution of a new enzymatic function. II. Evolution of multiple functions for ebg enzyme in E. coli. Genetics. 1978 Jul;89(3):453–465. doi: 10.1093/genetics/89.3.453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hall B. G. Experimental evolution of a new enzymatic function. Kinetic analysis of the ancestral (ebg) and evolved (ebg) enzymes. J Mol Biol. 1976 Oct 15;107(1):71–84. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(76)80018-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hall B. G., Hartl D. L. Regulation of newly evolved enzymes. I. Selection of a novel lactase regulated by lactose in Escherichia coli. Genetics. 1974 Mar;76(3):391–400. doi: 10.1093/genetics/76.3.391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hall B. G. Number of mutations required to evolve a new lactase function in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1977 Jan;129(1):540–543. doi: 10.1128/jb.129.1.540-543.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hall B. G. On the evolution of new metabolic functions in diploid organisms. Genetics. 1980 Dec;96(4):1007–1017. doi: 10.1093/genetics/96.4.1007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hall B. G. Regulation of newly evolved enzymes. IV. Directed evolution of the Ebg repressor. Genetics. 1978 Dec;90(4):673–681. doi: 10.1093/genetics/90.4.673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hall B. G., Zuzel T. The ebg operon consists of at least two genes. J Bacteriol. 1980 Dec;144(3):1208–1211. doi: 10.1128/jb.144.3.1208-1211.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Menzel R., Gellert M. Regulation of the genes for E. coli DNA gyrase: homeostatic control of DNA supercoiling. Cell. 1983 Aug;34(1):105–113. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90140-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pruss G. J., Manes S. H., Drlica K. Escherichia coli DNA topoisomerase I mutants: increased supercoiling is corrected by mutations near gyrase genes. Cell. 1982 Nov;31(1):35–42. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90402-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sancar A., Clarke N. D., Griswold J., Kennedy W. J., Rupp W. D. Identification of the uvrB gene product. J Mol Biol. 1981 May 5;148(1):63–76. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90235-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sancar A., Rupp W. D. Cloning of uvrA, lexC and ssb genes of Escherichia coli. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1979 Sep 12;90(1):123–129. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(79)91598-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sanzey B. Modulation of gene expression by drugs affecting deoxyribonucleic acid gyrase. J Bacteriol. 1979 Apr;138(1):40–47. doi: 10.1128/jb.138.1.40-47.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Stauffer G. V., Plamann M. D., Stauffer L. T. Construction and expression of hybrid plasmids containing the Escherichia coli glyA genes. Gene. 1981 Jun-Jul;14(1-2):63–72. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(81)90148-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sternglanz R., DiNardo S., Voelkel K. A., Nishimura Y., Hirota Y., Becherer K., Zumstein L., Wang J. C. Mutations in the gene coding for Escherichia coli DNA topoisomerase I affect transcription and transposition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 May;78(5):2747–2751. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.5.2747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Yang H. L., Heller K., Gellert M., Zubay G. Differential sensitivity of gene expression in vitro to inhibitors of DNA gyrase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Jul;76(7):3304–3308. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.7.3304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES