Abstract
Many proteins use Asx and Glx (x = n, p, or u) side chains as key functional groups in enzymatic catalysis and molecular recognition. In this study, NMR spin relaxation experiments and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are used to measure the dynamics of the side chain amide and carboxyl groups, 13Cγ/δ, in Escherichia coli ribonuclease HI (RNase H). Model-free analysis shows that the catalytic residues in RNase H are pre-organized on ps-ns timescales via a network of electrostatic interactions. However, chemical exchange line broadening shows that these residues display significant conformational dynamics on μs – ms timescales upon binding of Mg2+ ions. Two groups of catalytic residues exhibit differential linebroadening, implicating distinct reorganizational processes upon binding of metal ions. These results support the “mobile metal ion” hypothesis, which was inferred from structural studies of RNase H.
Understanding protein dynamics is critical for elucidating the molecular mechanisms of many biological processes, including enzyme catalysis and protein - protein interactions.1–3 Recent developments in nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spin relaxation methods have enabled the investigation of biomolecular dynamics in atomic detail.4–7 Nonetheless, despite the importance of Asx and Glx residues in enzyme catalysis and substrate binding processes, surprisingly few studies on the side chain dynamics of these residues have been reported.8–10 Here, we present a 13Cγ/δ relaxation investigation of the side chain amide and carboxyl groups in Asx/Glx residues of E. coli RNase H, by using recently developed NMR relaxation methods.8 To gain more mechanistic insights, we have compared our experimental findings with the results of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. RNase H cleaves the RNA strand of a RNA/DNA hybrid (Figure 1).11 The active site includes four acidic residues (D10, E48, D70, and D134) that require Mg2+ ions for catalytic activity.12–14 Experimental and simulated side chain generalized order parameters, S2, which represents the mobility of the C-C′ bond vector in the side chain amide and carboxyl groups of Asx/Glx residues, including the catalytic residues, provide direct evidence of pre-organization of the catalytic residues on ps – ns timescales. However, these pre-organized catalytic residues show significant conformational dynamics on μs – ms timescales, which might be required for reorganizing the catalytic groups upon sequential binding of metal ions.
Figure 1.
(A) Ribbon representation of RNase H (PDB ID 2RN2). All Asx/Glx residues are shown as stick models and color coded based on the value of S2MD. Key catalytic residues are labeled. (B) Structure of RNA/DNA hybrid substrate from the human RNase H complex (PDB ID 2KQ9) is superimposed onto E. coli protein (PDB ID 2RN2). The most rigid side chains are shown as space-filling models. DNA and RNA strands are shown in green and cyan, respectively.
Residue-specific values of S2 were determined using the model-free formalism applied to longitudinal (R1) and cross-correlated transverse (ηxy) relaxation rate constants of the 13Cγ/δ nuclei.8 The chemical shift anisotropy (CSA) tensors for carbonyl and carboxyl 13Cγ/δ are highly asymmetric and depend upon the local environment.15 For carbonyl 13C, we used the average backbone carbonyl 13C′ CSA values determined for GB1 using solid state NMR spectroscopy: δxx = 240.87 ppm, δyy = 196.62 ppm, and δzz = 93.5 ppm.15 For carboxyl 13C, δxx = 242 ppm, δyy = 191 ppm, and δzz = 105 ppm were assumed.16 The model-free analysis was also repeated with extreme CSA values of the carbonyl and carboxyl 13C′ to test the stability of the results (see Supporting Information, SI). We were able to analyze relaxation rates for 22 of the 34 Asx/Glx residues. Many of the excluded residues from the analysis are well-exposed to the solvent in the structure and showed very slow development of the cross peaks through cross-correlated relaxation; additional details of experiments and the model-free analysis are described in SI.
To complement experimental studies with direct observations of side chain dynamics, we performed MD simulations of E. coli RNase H initiated from the crystal structure (PDB ID 2RN2) protonated in accordance with experimental pKa measurements13 to reflect pH values of 5.5 and 8.0. The protein was described with the Amber99SB force field,17 solvated in TIP3P water, and neutralized with Cl− ions. Simulations of 100 ns duration were performed using Desmond Academic release 3 or source release 2.4.2.1.18 Experimental (S2NMR) and MD-derived (S2MD) side chain order parameters showed significant correlation (R2 = 0.72 and r.m.s.d. = 0.11) (Figure 2A), allowing us to use S2MD to infer the mechanistic details of dynamics in the ps-ns timescale.
Figure 2.
(A) Comparison of order parameters between the experiment (S2NMR) and simulation (S2MD). (B) Correlation plot between S2MD and crystallographic B-factor for side chains (PDB ID 2RN2). The B-factors are the sum of side chain heavy atoms (C, N, and O). (C) S2MD vs. relative solvent accessibility (RSA) of the side chain calculated from the crystal structure of RNase H (2RN2). RSA was calculated using GetArea.25 (D) Correlation plot between RSA and ΔpKa. The ΔpKa for D148 and D102 were estimated by assuming pKa = 2.0.13 Corresponding graphs with S2NMR are shown in SI.
Order parameters of Asx/Glx side chains showed a broad spectrum of dynamics and were uncorrelated with backbone N-H bond mobility (see SI). Values of S2MD correlate reasonably well with crystallographic B-factors of the side chains, despite the differences in the nature and timescale of the motions detected by each parameter (Figure 2B). On the contrary, S2MD are poorly correlated with relative solvent accessibility (RSA) of the side chains (Figure 2C). Recent analysis of order parameters for K side chain amino groups showed strong correlations with both crystallography B-factors and RSA of side chain amino groups.19 This difference suggests that the side chains of Asx/Glx interact more strongly with other parts of the protein because of a shorter side chain length relative to K. Notably, perturbations of pKa, relative to intrinsic values, do not linearly correlate with solvent accessibility of side chains for Asp or Glu (Figure 2D). With the exception of residue D70, pKa’s are close to intrinsic values for residues with RSA > 50%, but become highly heterogeneous for larger degrees of burial. The unusual perturbations of pKa for D10 and D70 reflect coupling arising from close spatial proximity in the active site.13
Overall, MD simulations showed that the side chains of D (S2MD,ave = 0.87 ± 0.08) and N (S2MD,ave = 0.85 ± 0.08) residues are the most rigid, followed by E (S2MD,ave = 0.64 ± 0.21) and Q (S2MD,ave = 0.46 ± 0.21) residues. S2MD values were used to obtain non-biased statistics because experimental data did not include S2NMR values of highly flexible residues. Nonetheless, the same pattern was observed with the experimental S2NMR values. A previous study on the side chain dynamics of calbindin D9k showed similar statistics for each amino acid type.8 It is possible that this effect is primarily due to side chain length; however, functional group rigidity is not necessary correlated to overall side chain entropy.20 Our data provide additional experimental evidence that the side chain of D is usually more rigid than that of E and support the hypothesis that the higher rigidity of the D side chain favors this residue in enzyme active sites.21
Rigid side chains are mainly located in the active site of RNase H, which binds to the RNA strand, and the interface with the DNA strand of the RNA/DNA hybrid substrate (Figure 1B). Experimental (simulation) S2 values of 13Cγ/δ for D10, E48, D70 and D134 are 0.67 ± 0.08 (0.85 ± 0.01), 0.72 ± 0.11 (0.76 ± 0.01), 0.75 ± 0.09 (0.78 ± 0.03), and 0.64 ± 0.04 (0.81 ± 0.01), respectively. Our NMR experiments were performed at pD = 6.2, which is close to the pKa of D10 (6.1).13 Therefore, experimental S2 values of the catalytic residues represent the average mobility of D10 in protonated and deprotonated states. High rigidity of the catalytic residues is also suggested by low crystallographic B-factors determined under conditions where D10 would be depro-tonated (pH > 8.8; PDB ID 2RN2).22 Because we calculated S2MD values with D10 in the protonated state and other acidic residues in the deprotonated state, we further tested if D10 remains rigid at high pH by running another simulation with deprotonated D10. During the simulation, we observed that deprotonated D10 forms a water-mediated hydrogen bond with D134 and remains highly rigid (S2MD = 0.847 ± 0.002). Discrepancies in S2 values for active site residues may reflect inability of standard molecular mechanics forces fields to model changes in protonation state and not incomplete conformational sampling alone. The crystal structure of Mg2+-bound RNaseH (PDB ID, 1RDD) shows relatively minor conformational change of the catalytic residues, relative to the apo state (PDB ID 2RN2)23(see SI). Therefore, our data indicate that the catalytic residues in RNaseH are pre-organized to minimize entropy penalties upon coordinating Mg2+ for catalysis.24
The net free energy change, ΔG, from electrostatic interactions of the acidic residues, D and E, can be calculated from the pKa shift relative to intrinsic pKa (Figure 3A). The free energy is the sum of three terms: ΔG = ΔHbind − T(ΔSsol + ΔSconf), in which ΔHbind is the enthalpy change, and ΔSsol and ΔSconf are the entropy changes associated with solvent and protein conformational changes, respectively. The contribution of −TΔSconf to the free energy can be estimated from ΔS2.26,27 Figure 3B presents – TΔSconf, which was calculated as shown by Yang and Kay.26 The horizontal distance between each data point and the calculated −TΔSconf line is an estimate of ΔHbind − TΔSsol provided by salt bridge formation (Figure 3B). This plot shows that the magnitudes of the local electrostatic interactions are highly heterogeneous.28,29 One group of residues has −0.5 kcal/mol ≤ ΔG ≤ 0 kcal/mol and the entropic penalty −TΔSconf nearly offsets the favorable contributions from ΔHbind − TΔSsol. A second set of residues has ΔG ≤ − 1 kcal/mol with large favorable contributions from ΔHbind − TΔSsol that offset the entropic penalty, despite the high rigidity of side chains in this group. Residue D10 is the only residue in the third group, having a positive value of ΔG, again reflecting interactions with D70 in the active site. These data indicate that the measurement of the side chain entropy of acidic residues can be critical for understanding the role of electrostatic interactions in biological processes. Although not considered in this analysis, −TΔSconf of the interacting partner molecule should also be determined for better estimation of ΔHbind − TΔSsol. We tested whether the differential burial of charged residues generates the heterogeneity in ΔHbind − TΔSsol. Interestingly, solvent accessibility of salt bridges only weakly correlates with ΔHbind − TΔSsol (R2 = 0.12) (Figure 3B), indicating that the geometry of the salt bridge may be more critical for its stability.29 Similar approaches using backbone and methyl-bearing side chains highlighted the role of conformational entropy in ligand binding.6,26,27,30 Because individual free energy changes upon salt bridge formation can be directly measured using ΔpKa, acidic side chain order parameters enable the site-specific analysis of energetic contribution of conformational dynamics. This is an additional benefit compared to the analysis using order parameters for backbone or methyl-bearing side chains.
Figure 3.

(A) Plot of S2MD vs. ΔG associated with the changes in pKa of each acidic residue. Solid line represents −TΔSconf.26 For calculation of −TΔSconf, the order parameter was assumed to change from 0.05 to each S2MD value (i.e. ΔS2MD = S2MD – 0.05). (B) Calculated ΔHbind − TΔSsol (bars) and relative solvent accessibility (closed circles) for each acidic residue. Uncertainties for the reported pKa values are not available so the calculated ΔHbind − TΔSsol do not include uncertainties. Plots with the experimental order parameters are shown in SI.
The 13Cγ/δ order parameters become extremely heterogeneous as side chains becomes more exposed to the solvent (RSA > 35%). Although buried residues (RSA < 20 %) tend to have high S2 values, many partially or fully solvent-exposed residues also have high S2 values (Figure 2D). For example, E57 and R106 form a solvent-exposed salt bridge, which results in high rigidity for the side chains of both residues. By contrast, D102 and R46 form a completely buried salt bridge and also showed high rigidity for both interacting side chains. This indicates that solvent-exposed salt-bridges and hydrogen bonds can restrict the motion of the C-C′ bond as effectively as completely buried salt-bridges. The partially solvent-exposed D134 (RSA = 44.5 %) forms a salt-bridge with R138, resulting in high order parameters for both residues. The D134-R138 salt bridge is strong enough to offset 1.13 kcal mol−1 entropic penalty from −TΔSconf, giving ΔG ≈ 0. When the enzyme-substrate (ES) complex is formed, this salt bridge breaks and D134 coordinates a metal ion for catalysis and R138 interacts with the phosphodiester bond of the RNA/DNA substrate to stabilize the ES complex. Therefore, the entropic cost of forming the ES complex may be minimized by preordering these two side chains. This example illustrates the insights provided by side chain order parameters into the molecular origins of the specificity and binding affinity of proteins.
The RNase H family is found in nearly all organisms, from viruses to human. We investigated if side chains with high S2 values are evolutionary conserved (see SI). Interestingly, the most conserved Asx/Glx residues are D10, N16, N45, E48, D70, N130, E131, and D134, all of which have high S2 values (> 0.8). The rigidity of N45 and N130 is particularly notable because these residues interact with the substrate in the H. sapiens complex and are located within 4Å of the active-site catalytic residues. However, not all residues with high values of S2 are well conserved. For example, E6 forms a partially buried salt bridge with R27 in E. coli RNase H. Replacement of E6 by a hydrophobic residue, V in human RNase H, is accompanied by replacement of R27 by a hydrophobic residue, also V in human RNase H (see SI). Diverse functional roles of buried salt bridges have been described in other contexts.31–33 Waldburger et al. reported that replacement of a salt bridge network by hydrophobic residues increases the stability of the Arc repressor, but changes binding cooperativity.32 RNase H exists as a separate entity in E. coli, whereas it is part of multi-domain protein in many other organisms including human. Thus, dissection of the role of buried electrostatic interactions should be considered in the context of full-length proteins, and not just isolated domains.
Despite many structural and biochemical studies, the details of Mg2+ binding and coordination in the active site of RNase H are not completely understood.12,34,35 Figure 4A shows the effects on 13Cγ/δ line widths from chemical exchange on the μs – ms time-scale associated with Mg2+ binding processes determined from R1ρ data acquired with and without Mg2+. Catalytic residuesin the active site, except E48, showed significant Rex = R1ρMg − R1ρapo. To determine if the observed 13Cγ/δ dynamics represent the same motional process, we plotted Rex versus squared chemical shift differences, Δω2, between apo and Mg2+-bound RNase H. Assuming a fast exchange process, residues with non-zero Rex are expected to belong to a single correlation line between Rex and Δω2 if the residues experience the same conformational exchange process. The pKa of some residues are changed upon binding of Mg2+; however, the pKa shifts do not affect Rex (see SI). Interestingly, we found two distinct groups of residues showing differential dynamics in response to Mg2+ binding (Figure 4B and 4C). Group-1 consists of N44, E57, and D102, and group-2 consists of D10, E48, D70 and D134. E48 has large uncertainty because of low signal-to-noise ratio in Mg2+-bound state. We included D10 in group-2 because Rex was too large to be measured and this residue has the largest chemical shift difference (Δω2 = 45.0 × 105 s−2) between apo and Mg-bound RNase H, consistent with the proposed role of D10 as a major metal ion-coordinating residue.
Figure 4.
(A) Contribution of μs − ms timescale dynamics, Rex (= R1ρMg − R1ρapo, upon binding of Mg2+ to the active site. The D10 peak was too broadened to measure. The spin-lock RF amplitude was ωSL/2π = 1.1 kHz (see SI). (B) Correlation plot between Rex and the squared chemical shift differences, Δω2, between apo and Mg2+-bound states. The residues belong to group-1 and -2 are labeled in blue and red, respectively. (C) Ribbon representation of the active site of RNase H (PDB ID 1RDD). Group-1 and -2 residues are color coded according to panel B. Only active site residues are shown for clarity. The Mg2+ ion is shown as a cyan sphere.
RNase H has been proposed to coordinate two Mg2+ ions for catalysis,14,34 although only a single Mg2+ ion was found in the active site in the absence of substrate.23 According to the substrate-bound structure of human RNase H (the two Mg2+ ion model), the A-site consists of D10 and D134, while the B-site consists of D10, D70, and E48.14 Proper binding of the substrate is essential for promoting the coordination of two Mg2+ ions in the active site.14 Moreover, the position of metal ion in the active site may be is highly heterogeneous (see SI) and mobile depending on the catalytic step.12,14,35 The difference in μs - ms timescale dynamics between group-1 and -2 may indicate that the binding of the first Mg2+ can trigger conformational dynamics of the residues required for coordinating the second Mg2+ ion and substrate. Complex interplay among active site residues upon binding of metal ions was also proposed based on structural analysis of Mn2+-bound RNase H.12 However, our current data do not distinguish whether the observed μ – ms timescale dynamics of the group-1 residues is induced by the binding of the first Mg2+ ion to the group-2, or whether metal ion binding changes the chemical environment in a way that hidden, but already present, dynamics become observable. In summary, although the catalytic residues of RNase H are highly rigid in the ps – ns timescale, they undergo significant conformational dynamics in the μs – ms timescale upon metal ion binding, which may reflect reorganization of the active site.24,36
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by an NSF graduate research fellowship (K.A.S.) and NIH grant GM50291 (A.G.P.). We thank the Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (C2B2) for computational resources.
Footnotes
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Experimental and simulation details; correlation plots shown in Figure 2 and 3 with S2NMR; sequence alignment of multiple RNase H; a figure illustrating heterogeneous metal binding; a figure illustrating Rex vs. papb. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
- 1.Smock RG, Gierasch LM. Science. 2009;324:198. doi: 10.1126/science.1169377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Nashine VC, Hammes-Schiffer S, Benkovic SJ. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2010;14:644. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2010.07.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Boehr DD, Nussinov R, Wright PE. Nat Chem Biol. 2009;5:789. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Boehr DD, McElheny D, Dyson JJ, Wright PE. Science. 2006;15:1638. doi: 10.1126/science.1130258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mittermaier A, Kay LE. Science. 2006;312:224. doi: 10.1126/science.1124964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wand AJ. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2013;23:75. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2012.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Palmer AG. Chem Rev. 2004;104:3623. doi: 10.1021/cr030413t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Paquin R, Ferrage F, Mulder FA, Akke M, Bodenhausen G. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:15805. doi: 10.1021/ja803794g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hansen AL, Kay LE. J Biomol NMR. 2011;50:347. doi: 10.1007/s10858-011-9520-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pasat G, Zintsmaster JS, Peng JW. J Magn Reson. 2008;193:226. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2008.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Crouch RJ, Dirksen ML. Nuclease. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; Cold Spring Harbor: 1982. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Goedken ER, Marqusee S. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:7266. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M009626200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Oda Y, Yamazaki T, Nagayama K, Kanaya S, Kuroda Y, Nakamura H. Biochemistry. 1994;33:5275. doi: 10.1021/bi00183a034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nowotny M, Gaidamakov SA, Ghirlando R, Cerritelli SM, Crouch RJ, Yang W. Mol Cell. 2007;28:264. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wylie BJ, Sperling LJ, Frericks HL, Shah GJ, Franks WT, Rienstra CM. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:5318. doi: 10.1021/ja0701199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gardiennet-Doucet C, Henry B, Tekely P. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc. 2006;49:129. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hornak V, Abel R, Okur A, Strockbine B, Roiterg A, Simmering C. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinf. 2006;65:712. doi: 10.1002/prot.21123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bowers KJ, Chow E, Xu H, Dror RO, Eastwood MP, Gregersen BA, Klepeis JL, Kolossvary I, Moraes MA, Sacerdoti FD, Salmon JK, Shan Y, Shaw DE. Proceedings of the 2006 ACM/IEEE conference on Supercomputing. Vol. 84 ACM; Tampa, Florida: 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Esadze A, Li DW, Wang T, Brüschweiler R, Iwahara J. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:909. doi: 10.1021/ja107847d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Trbovic N, Cho JH, Abel R, Friesner RA, Rance M, Palmer AGr. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:615. doi: 10.1021/ja806475k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bartlett GJ, Porter CT, Borkakoti N, Thornton JM. J Mol Biol. 2002;324:105. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(02)01036-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Katayanagi K, Miyagawa M, Matsushima M, Ishikawa M, Kanaya S, Nakamura H, Ikehara M, Matsuzaki T, Morikawa K. J Mol Biol. 1992;223:1029. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90260-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Katayanagi K, Okumura M, Morikawa K. Proteins. 1993;17:337. doi: 10.1002/prot.340170402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Warshel A. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:27035. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.42.27035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Fraczkiewics R, Braun W. J Comp Chem. 1998;19:319. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yang D, Kay LE. J Mol Biol. 1996;263:369. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Akke M, Bruschweiler R, Palmer AG. J Am Chem Soc. 1993;115:9832. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Isom DG, Castañeda CA, Cannon BR, Velu PD, García-Moreno EB. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:16096. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1004213107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kumar S, Nussinov R. J Mol Biol. 1999;293:1241. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tzeng SR, Kalodimos CG. Nature. 2012;488:236. doi: 10.1038/nature11271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dong F, Zhou H-X. Biophys J. 2002;83:1341. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)73904-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Waldburger CD, Schildbach JF, Sauer RT. Nat Struct Biol. 1995;2:122. doi: 10.1038/nsb0295-122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Xu D, Tsai CJ, Nussinov R. Protein Eng. 1997;10:999. doi: 10.1093/protein/10.9.999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yang W. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2008;15:1228. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tsunaka Y, Takano K, Matsumura H, Yamagata Y, Kanaya S. J Mol Biol. 2004;324:1171. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hammes-Schiffer S. Biochemistry. 2013;52:2012. doi: 10.1021/bi301515j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



