Skip to main content
BMJ Open logoLink to BMJ Open
. 2014 Feb 6;4(2):e003734. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003734

Current smoking and secondhand smoke exposure and depression among Korean adolescents: analysis of a national cross-sectional survey

Kyung-Jae Lee 1
PMCID: PMC3918992  PMID: 24503297

Abstract

Objectives

To examine the association between cigarette smoke exposure and depression among Korean adolescents using the seventh Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-based Survey (KYRBWS).

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting

A nationally representative sample of middle and high school students across South Korea.

Participants

75 643 eligible participants across the country.

Primary outcome measures

Current smoking, secondhand smoke exposure and depression.

Methodology

Data were analysed from a nationally representative survey of 75 643 participants (37 873 men and 37 770 women). Data were gathered on extensive information including current smoking, secondhand smoke exposure and depression in adolescence. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the association between current smoking, secondhand smoke exposure and depression in Korean adolescents.

Results

Among those who had never smoked, secondhand smoke exposure was positively associated with depression in male and female adolescents in a dose–response relation (OR 1.27, OR 1.52 in males; OR 1.25, OR 1.72 in females). Similar associations were observed among currently smoking men and women in a dose–response manner (OR 1.29, OR 1.55 in males; OR 1.22, OR 1.41 in females). These significant trends were consistently observed even after adjustments.

Conclusions

We suggested that current smoking and secondhand smoke exposure were positively associated with depression in male and female adolescents. Efforts to encourage no smoking and no secondhand smoke exposure will be established for adolescents.

Keywords: Epidemiology, Public Health, Preventive Medicine, Mental Health


Strengths and limitations of this study.

  • The main strength of this study is that data from a nationally representative sample in South Korea was used; response rate to this survey was high.

  • The main limitations are a cross-sectional study design and its use of self-reports.

  • Unmeasured confounding variables cannot be analysed in this study.

Background

Smoking continues to be the leading preventable cause of death and disease in the world; nearly six million die annually from cigarette smoking, and more than 600 000 deaths occur each year due to secondhand smoke exposure, according to the WHO.1 2 Smoking was reported to have caused more than 46 000 deaths a year in Korea, 18.7% of total deaths.3 In total, 88% of adult cigarette smokers who smoke daily reported that they started smoking by the age of 18, indicating that smoking was initiated and established primarily during adolescence.4–6 The Korean smoking rate remains significantly high in comparison with the average rate among the Organisation for Economic Co-operation Development countries. Korea had the second highest smoking rate among the Organisation for Economic Co-operation Development countries in 2009, recording 44.3% among adults.7 8

Tobacco use has been associated with serious diseases, including cancer, cardiovascular and respiratory diseases.9 Epidemiological studies have reported that current smokers are at greater risk for mental health problems,10 11 although the exact nature of this association is still unclear. There has been some speculation since 1975 that secondhand smoke exposure may somehow be linked to mental illness, but until recently there has not been sufficient evidence.12–16 Secondhand smoke may be a proxy for stressful living conditions, and stress has been associated with poor mental health.17 Moreover, smoking was presented as a gateway to drug and alcohol consumption among adolescents. The principle of antismoking in adolescents must be addressed to prevent many of the long-term diseases associated with smoking and other substance use in the future.4 5 Unfortunately, the risk of psychiatric illness such as depression are of great vulnerability to youth who are experiencing remarkable growth physically, mentally and socially. Depression can be significant sources of morbidity; adolescent suicide was reported to be the most common cause of death among Korean adolescents in 2009 and 2010.18 However, there has not yet been enough research in Korea examining adolescent smoking including secondhand smoke exposure and depression.

Here, the objective was to examine the possible association between smoke exposure and depression among Korean adolescents. In order to assess current smoking and secondhand smoke exposure among Korean adolescents and their relation to depression, data from the seventh Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-Based Survey (KYRBWS) were analysed in this study.

Methods

Study sample and procedures

The basis for this investigation lies with the seventh KYRBWS, which was established in 2011.19 This study is a government-approved statistical survey that has been performed annually since 2005 to monitor priority health risk behaviours among Korean adolescents by the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A stratified multistage cluster-sampling design was used to obtain a nationally representative sample of middle and high school students for the survey. Students voluntarily completed the anonymous, self-administered web-based survey during a regular class period. This study comprised 134 questions assessing demographic characteristics and 14 areas of health-related behaviours, including cigarette smoking and mental health. Details of the study design are provided elsewhere.19–21

A total of 79 202 students from 400 middle schools and 400 high schools were engaged in the survey and the response rate was 95.5%. Finally, 75 643 eligible participants (37 873 male and 37 770 female) were included in the analysis.

This study used deidentified data on the seventh KYRBWS as a government-approved statistical survey and informed consent was obtained from all persons who participated in this survey.

Assessment of exposure

The outcome variable ‘depression’ was assessed through responses to the question, ‘During the recent 12 months, have you ever felt sad or hopeless almost every day for 2 weeks in a row that you stopped doing some usual activities?’ Current smoking and drinking behaviours were determined based on the responses to the following questions: ‘During the recent 30 days, how many cigarettes did you smoke per day on average?’ and ‘During the past 30 days, how many cups did you drink on average?’ Current smoking was measured using a graded categorical variable coded from 0 to 3: 0 (never smoked), 1 (smoked 1 cigarette or less), 2 (smoked 2–9 cigarettes) and 3 (smoked 10 or more cigarettes). Current drinking behaviour was classified using a dichotomous categorical variable coded as 0 (no) or 1 (yes). Secondhand smoke exposure was assessed through the question, ‘During the past 7 days, how many days did you stay either with your families or visitors when they smoked within your home?’ Secondhand smoke exposure was measured using a graded categorical variable coded from 0 to 2: 0 (no exposure), 1 (exposed 1–4 days) and 2 (exposed 5 or more days). Sociodemographic variables included age, sex, height, weight, region of residence, school type and grade, socioeconomic status, perceived stress and whether the family lives together. A measure of socioeconomic status was obtained through a five-point scale measuring family economic level ranging from 1 (high) to 5 (low).

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to examine the distribution of demographic and social characteristics. A χ2 test was used to estimate the difference in the existence of depression by current smoke and secondhand smoke exposure. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the association between smoke exposure and depression. Age, sex, sociodemographic and depression variables that showed a significant difference in a χ2 test and t test were adjusted for the analysis. The adjusted OR and corresponding 95% CIs were calculated. All p values were considered to be statistically significant at less than 0.05. All estimates were calculated based on sample weights, which were evaluated by taking into consideration the sampling rate, response rate, sex, school type and grade proportions of the reference population. Of whom 4.5% were missing, and hence missing data were already reflected to response rate when calculating weight. The analysis was adjusted for the complex sample design of the survey.20 21 All analyses were conducted using SPSS V.14.0.

Results

Characteristics of the eligible subjects

A total of 75 643 participants were analysed in this study, of whom 32.8% were classified as feeling depressed. A significantly higher prevalence of depression was observed in female patients compared with male adolescents (p<0.001). The social and demographic characteristics of the study participants are provided in table 1. No significant differences were seen in city size, school type or grade proportions between men and women, while there was significant difference in socioeconomic status (p<0.001). The proportion of those who perceived stress was higher in men than in women (p<0.001). A significantly higher proportion of men did not live with their families compared with women (p=0.008).

Table 1.

Background characteristics of the study participants

Characteristics Total Male Female p Value†
Age (years) 15.15±0.019 15.18±0.039 15.12±0.040 0.443
Height (cm) 165.42±0.140 170.23±0.113 160.08±0.045 <0.001***
Weight (kg) 56.51±0.137 60.77±0.136 51.79±0.071 <0.001***
City size
 Large 39 177 (53.5) 19 830 (53.6) 19 347 (53.4)
 Medium 29 365 (42.5) 14 488 (42.4) 14 877 (42.6)
 Small 7101 (4.0) 3555 (4.0) 3546 (4.0) 0.469
Grade in school
 Middle first 12 728 (16.0) 6548 (15.8) 6180 (16.1)
 Middle second 12 903 (16.7) 6413 (16.4) 6490 (17.0)
 Middle third 12 843 (16.9) 6589 (16.9) 6254 (16.9)
 High first 12 569 (17.2) 6386 (17.3) 6183 (17.1)
 High second 12 508 (16.7) 5954 (16.8) 6554 (16.5)
 High third 12 092 (16.6) 5983 (16.7) 6109 (16.4) 0.941
School type
 Middle school 38 474 (49.5) 19 550 (49.1) 18 924 (50.0)
 General high school 27 303 (38.8) 13 971 (38.8) 13 332 (38.7)
 Vocational high school 9866 (11.7) 4352 (12.1) 5514 (11.3) 0.853
Family economic level
 High 4777 (6.7) 3165 (8.6) 1612 (4.5)
 Middle high 17 654 (24.1) 9401 (25.1) 8253 (22.9)
 Average 35 762 (46.8) 16 929 (44.4) 18 833 (49.6)
 Middle low 13 549 (17.5) 6336 (16.6) 7213 (18.4)
 Low 3901 (5.0) 2042 (5.3) 1859 (4.6) <0.001***
Stress
 No 32 117 (42.0) 13 547 (35.8) 18 570 (49.0)
 Yes 43 526 (58.0) 24 326 (64.2) 19 200 (51.0) <0.001***
Family live together
 Yes 71 859 (95.7) 35 886 (95.3) 35 973 (96.1)
 No 3784 (4.3) 1987 (4.7) 1797 (3.9) 0.008**
Depression (recent 12 month)
 No 50 482 (67.2) 27 266 (72.0) 23 216 (61.8)
 Yes 25 161 (32.8) 10 607 (28.0) 14 554 (38.2) <0.001***
Total 75 643 (100.0) 37 873 (50.1) 37 770 (49.9)

**p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

†By unpaired t test and χ2 test.

Table 2 shows the proportions of current smoking and secondhand smoke exposure by depression. The proportion of those who had never smoked was lower than that of current smokers in adolescents who felt depressed (p<0.001). Among adolescents who felt depressed, the percentages of no exposure were lower than that of secondhand smoke exposure (p<0.001). Similar significant trends were observed in male and female adolescents (p<0.001).

Table 2.

Current smoking and secondhand smoke exposure according to depression

Depression
Variables No N (%) Yes N (%) χ2 p Value†
Male and female
Current smoking
 Never smoked 45 771 (69.1) 20 884 (30.9)
 1 cigarette or less per day 1266 (57.6) 984 (42.4)
 2–9 cigarettes per day 2543 (54.2) 2233 (45.8)
 10 or more cigarettes per day 902 (46.8) 1060 (53.2) 973.499 <0.001***
Secondhand smoke exposure
 No exposure 31 491 (70.6) 13 425 (29.4)
 1–4 days per week 13 147 (64.9) 7188 (35.1)
 5 or more days per week 5844 (56.7) 4548 (43.3) 791.501 <0.001***
Male
Current smoking
 Never smoked 23 500 (74.7) 8022 (25.3)
 1 cigarette or less per day 969 (66.4) 512 (33.6)
 2–9 cigarettes per day 2043 (59.8) 1371 (40.2)
 10 or more cigarettes per day 754 (51.8) 702 (48.2) 703.657 <0.001***
Secondhand smoke exposure
 No exposure 17 233 (74.9) 5826 (25.1)
 1–4 days per week 7123 (69.5) 3098 (30.5)
 5 or more days per week 2910 (63.2) 1683 (36.8) 302.983 <0.001***
Female
Current smoking
 Never smoked 22 271 (63.7) 12 862 (36.3)
 1 cigarette or less per day 297 (38.0) 472 (62.0)
 2–9 cigarettes per day 500 (36.9) 862 (63.1)
 10 or more cigarettes per day 148 (28.8) 358 (71.2) 780.817 <0.001***
Secondhand smoke exposure
 No exposure 14 258 (65.6) 7599 (34.4)
 1–4 days per week 6024 (59.6) 4090 (40.4)
 5 or more days per week 2934 (51.0) 2865 (49.0) 438.810 <0.001***

***p<0.001.

†By χ2 test.

Associations between firsthand and secondhand smoke exposure and depression

To examine the association between current smoking and depression, a multiple logistic regression analysis was performed (table 3). Currently smoking adolescents were more prone to feeling depressed compared with those who had never smoked. A twofold increase in depression was observed in those smoking 10 or more cigarettes per day versus those who have never smoked (OR 2.27, 95% CI 2.07 to 2.49). The effect was slightly smaller, although still significant association after adjustments (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.51 to 1.88). Secondhand smoke exposure was positively associated with depression compared with no exposure (those exposed 1–4 days, OR 1.27; those exposed 5 or more days, OR 1.68). After adjustment for significant control variables, significant associations remained (those exposed 1–4 days, OR 1.22; those exposed 5 or more days, OR 1.36). In the sex-stratified analyses, these trends were observed consistently in male and female adolescents.

Table 3.

ORs for depression by current smoking and secondhand smoke exposure

Variables OR (95% CI) OR* (95% CI) OR† (95% CI)
Male and female
Current smoking
 (1 cigarette or less per day/no) 1.57 (1.44 to 1.72) 1.54 (1.41 to 1.69)‡ 1.44 (1.31 to 1.59)§
 (2–9 cigarettes per day/no) 1.77 (1.65 to 1.90) 1.58 (1.47 to 1.70)‡ 1.50 (1.40 to 1.62)§
 (10 or more cigarettes per day/no) 2.27 (2.07 to 2.49) 1.89 (1.71 to 2.10)‡ 1.69 (1.51 to 1.88)§
Secondhand smoke exposure
 (1–4 days per week/no) 1.27 (1.22 to 1.32) 1.25 (1.20 to 1.30)‡ 1.22 (1.17 to 1.27)§
 (5 or more days per week/no) 1.68 (1.60 to 1.76) 1.54 (1.47 to 1.61)‡ 1.36 (1.29 to 1.43)§
Male
Current smoking
 (1 cigarette or less per day/no) 1.44 (1.29 to 1.62) 1.30 (1.16 to 1.47) 1.27 (1.12 to 1.43)
 (2–9 cigarettes per day/no) 1.87 (1.73 to 2.03) 1.49 (1.37 to 1.62) 1.43 (1.31 to 1.57)
 (10 or more cigarettes per day/no) 2.51 (2.25 to 2.80) 1.82 (1.61 to 2.05) 1.61 (1.42 to 1.82)
Secondhand smoke exposure
 (1–4 days per week/no) 1.28 (1.21 to 1.34) 1.26 (1.20 to 1.33) 1.24 (1.18 to 1.32)
 (5 or more days per week/no) 1.49 (1.38 to 1.61) 1.44 (1.34 to 1.56) 1.31 (1.21 to 1.42)
Female
Current smoking
 (1 cigarette or less per day/no) 2.65 (2.29 to 3.08) 2.16 (1.85 to 2.52) 1.88 (1.61 to 2.19)
 (2–9 cigarettes per day/no) 2.78 (2.48 to 3.12) 1.97 (1.74 to 2.23) 1.76 (1.55 to 1.99)
 (10 or more cigarettes per day/no) 3.80 (3.11 to 4.65) 2.50 (2.01 to 3.11) 2.17 (1.73 to 2.74)
Secondhand smoke exposure
 (1–4 days per week/no) 1.25 (1.18 to 1.32) 1.23 (1.16 to 1.29) 1.18 (1.12 to 1.25)
 (5 or more days per week/no) 1.68 (1.57 to 1.79) 1.61 (1.51 to 1.72) 1.39 (1.30 to 1.50)

*Adjusted for age and alcohol consumption.

†Additionally adjusted for age, alcohol consumption, socioeconomic status, stress and family live together.

‡Adjusted for age, sex and alcohol consumption.

§Additionally adjusted for age, sex, alcohol consumption, socioeconomic status, stress and family live together.

We performed an additional analysis of the relationship between secondhand smoke exposure and depression with data stratified by current smoking status (table 4). Among those who had never smoked, secondhand smoke exposure was positively related to depression in a dose–response relation with an increasing risk for an increasing frequency (those exposed 1–4 days, OR 1.26; those exposed 5 or more days, OR 1.71). Significant associations were observed between secondhand smoke exposure and depression among current smokers. Compared with no exposure, those exposed to secondhand smoke between 1 and 4 days/week showed a 33% increased risk of depression (95% CI 1.19 to 1.48) while those exposed to secondhand smoke 5 or more days per week exhibited a 62% increased risk (95% CI 1.44 to 1.82). The difference between ORs was smaller when adjusted.

Table 4.

Association between secondhand smoke exposure and depression in those who have never smoked and current smokers

Variables N OR (95% CI) OR* (95% CI) OR† (95% CI)
Never smoked (n=66 655)
Secondhand smoke exposure
 No exposure 40 815 1 (reference) 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
 1–4 days per week 17 778 1.26 (1.21 to 1.31) 1.23 (1.18 to 1.29) 1.20 (1.15 to 1.25)
 5 or more days per week 8062 1.71 (1.63 to 1.81) 1.57 (1.49 to 1.66) 1.38 (1.30 to 1.46)
Current smoker (n=8988)
Secondhand smoke exposure
 No exposure 4101 1 (reference) 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
 1–4 days/week 2557 1.33 (1.19 to 1.48) 1.26 (1.13 to 1.41) 1.26 (1.12 to 1.42)
 5 or more days per week 2330 1.62 (1.44 to 1.82) 1.44 (1.28 to 1.62) 1.33 (1.17 to 1.50)

*Adjusted for age, sex and alcohol consumption.

†Additionally adjusted for age, sex and alcohol consumption, socioeconomic status, stress and family live together.

The sex-specific associations between secondhand smoke exposure and depression in never smokers and current smokers are given in table 5. When exposed between 1 and 4 days/week, a 27% increased risk of feeling depressed was observed compared with no exposure among male adolescents who had never smoked (95% CI 1.20 to 1.35). When exposed 5 or more days per week, the extent of the increase in feeling depressed was greater than when exposed between 1 and 4 days/week (OR 1.52; 95% CI 1.39 to 1.65). Among currently smoking male adolescents, a significant association between secondhand smoke exposure and depression was consistently observed in dose–response relations (OR 1.29 in those exposed 1 to 4 days; OR 1.55 in those exposed 5 or more days). There was a slightly smaller, although still significant association after adjustments. Female adolescents had a significant relationship between secondhand smoke exposure and depression. Among those who had never smoked, secondhand smoke exposure was positively associated with depression in a dose–response relation after adjustments (OR 1.17 in those exposed 1–4 days; OR 1.41 in those exposed 5 or more days). Similar associations were observed among current smokers (OR 1.25 in those exposed 1–4 days; OR 1.30 in those exposed 5 or more days). When exposed to secondhand smoke 5 or more days per week, the extent of increased risk in feeling depressed was more profound in females who had never smoked than in males (ORfemales 1.41; ORmales 1.32).

Table 5.

Sex-specific association between secondhand smoke exposure and depression in those who have never smoked and current smokers

Variables N OR (95% CI) OR* (95% CI) OR† (95% CI)
Male
Never smoked
 Secondhand smoke exposure 31 522
 No exposure 19 995 1 (reference) 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
 1–4 days per week 8444 1.27 (1.20 to 1.35) 1.25 (1.18 to 1.32) 1.23 (1.16 to 1.30)
 5 or more days per week 3083 1.52 (1.39 to 1.65) 1.46 (1.34 to 1.59) 1.32 (1.20 to 1.44)
Current smoker
 Secondhand smoke exposure 6351
 No exposure 3064 1 (reference) 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
 1–4 days per week 1777 1.29 (1.13 to 1.47) 1.28 (1.12 to 1.47) 1.26 (1.09 to 1.46)
 5 or more days per week 1510 1.55 (1.35 to 1.78) 1.46 (1.28 to 1.68) 1.34 (1.16 to 1.54)
Female
Never smoked
 Secondhand smoke exposure 35 133
 No exposure 20 820 1 (reference) 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
 1–4 days per week 9334 1.25 (1.18 to 1.32) 1.22 (1.16 to 1.29) 1.17 (1.11 to 1.24)
 5 or more days per week 4979 1.72 (1.60 to 1.84) 1.64 (1.54 to 1.76) 1.41 (1.30 to 1.52)
Current smoker
 Secondhand smoke exposure 2637
 No exposure 1037 1 (reference) 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
 1–4 days per week 780 1.22 (1.00 to 1.48) 1.21 (0.99 to 1.47) 1.25 (1.02 to 1.54)
 5 or more days per week 820 1.41 (1.15 to 1.73) 1.35 (1.10 to 1.66) 1.30 (1.04 to 1.62)

*Adjusted for age and alcohol consumption.

†Additionally adjusted for age, alcohol consumption, socioeconomic status, stress and family live together.

Discussion

The present results suggested a strong association between depression and cigarette smoke exposure including firsthand and secondhand smoke exposure in Korean adolescents with a dose–response relation. To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the association between secondhand smoke exposure and depression in a nationally representative sample of Korean adolescents. Secondhand smoke exposure was positively associated with depression among the total sample of non-smokers even after adjustments. Furthermore, we found a dose–response relation so that likelihood of depression increased with an increasing number of cigarettes smoked per day for current smokers. Similarly, the increasing frequency of secondhand smoke exposure was associated with increasing risk of depression. The observed association between smoking and depression might reflect a causal influence of smoking on depression. In previous studies with adolescents, changes in early emergence of depression and smoking behaviours are described, although model variation and inconsistent findings make the evidence unclear.22–24 However, we must address the fact that early use of tobacco has substantial health consequences that begin almost immediately in adolescence. Furthermore, tobacco use in adolescence increases the possibility of continuing to smoke as an adult. We further speculate that very few people will begin to smoke if they remain tobacco-free in adolescence.4 Consistent with this study, Nakata et al15 found that the self-report of secondhand smoke exposure was related to depression among Japanese workers, although the study participants were adults, not adolescents. Bandiera et al13 found a significant association between secondhand smoke exposure and depression among 2901 children and adolescents.

Possible explanations for these results are that secondhand smoke exposure may contribute to lowering levels of dopamine and γ-aminobutyric acid, which have been related to an increased risk for depression, similar to those observed in firsthand smokers.25–27 Being exposed to secondhand smoke may be a proxy to stressful living, and stress has been associated with depression.25 In fact, Pahl et al28 found that homes that did not allow smoking had persons having a healthy lifestyle of diet and exercise, which in turn was associated with less risk of depression.

The main limitations of this study were a cross-sectional study design and its use of self-reports. This study design cannot prove a causal or temporal relation between smoking and depression. Similarly, when we considered depression and secondhand exposure, our analyses were based on the use of self-reports and it may result in the possibility of information bias. Finally, unmeasured confounding variables cannot be analysed in this study. The known limitations of cross-sectional studies notwithstanding, the present study has the following strengths: it used a large nationwide representative sample of Korean middle and high school students for the survey; response rate to this survey was high; and finally, firsthand and secondhand smoke exposure were investigated as depression-related risk factors for depression in adolescents.

Conclusion

In conclusion, it is suggested that current smoking and secondhand smoke exposure are positively associated with depression in male and female adolescents. We suggest that secondhand smoke exposure with current smoking might be an important factor associated with depression in Korean adolescents. Therefore, effective strategies to encourage adolescents not to smoke and to reduced their exposure to secondhand smoke will need to be established. Stricter smoking bans will need to be implemented in homes and metropolitan areas, as well as in all enclosed public areas such as schools.

Supplementary Material

Author's manuscript
Reviewer comments

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank all study participants of this national survey for voluntary participation and the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for this investigation of the seventh KYRBWS.

Footnotes

Funding: This work was supported by Soonchunhyang University research fund.

Competing interests: None.

Ethics approval: Institutional Review Board at Soonchunhyang University.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Data sharing statement: No additional data are available.

References

  • 1.World Health Organization The Third WHO Report on the global tobacco epidemic. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2011 [Google Scholar]
  • 2.World Health Organization Implementing smoke-free environments: report on the global tobacco epidemic. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2009 [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jee SH, Lee JK, Kim IS. Smoking-attributable mortality among Korean adults: 1981–2003. Korean J Epidmiol 2006;28:92–9 [Google Scholar]
  • 4.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Preventing tobacco use among youth and young adults: a report of the surgeon general. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2012. http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/sgr/2012/index.htm (assessed 26 Jul 2013). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Preventing tobacco use among young people: a report of the surgeon general. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1994. http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/sgr/1994/index.htm (accessed 26 Jul 2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Campaign for tobacco-free kids The path to smoking addiction starts at very young ages. Washington: Campaign for tobacco-free kids, 2013. http://www.tobaccofreekids.org/facts_issues/fact_sheets/toll/tobacco_kids (accessed 26 Jul 2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Organisation for Economic Co-operation Development/World Health Organization Health at a glance: Asia/Pacific. OECD Publishing, 2012:50–1 http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/HealthAtAGlanceAsiaPacific2012.pdf (accessed 26 Jul 2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Organisation for Economic Co-operation Development OECD Factbook 2011–2012: Economic, Environmental and Social statistics. OECD Publishing, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/factbook-2011-en (accessed 26 Jul 2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ezzati M, Lopez AD, Rodgers A, et al. Selected major risk factors and global and regional burden of disease. Lancet 2002;360:1347–60 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dierker LC, Avenevoli S, Stolar M, et al. Smoking and depression: an examination of mechanisms of comorbidity. Am J Psychiatry 2002;159:947–53 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Klungsoyr O, Nygard JF, Sorensen T, et al. Cigarette smoking and incidence of first depressive episode: an 11-year, population-based follow-up study. Am J Epidemiol 2006;163:421–32 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bandiera FC, Arheart KL, Caban-Martinez AJ, et al. Secondhand smoke exposure and depressive symptoms. Psychosom Med 2010;72:68–72 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bandiera FC, Richardson AK, Lee DJ, et al. Secondhand smoke exposure and mental health among children and adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2011;165:332–8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hamer M, Stamatakis E, Batty GD. Objectively assessed secondhand smoke exposure and mental health in adults: cross-sectional and prospective evidence from the Scottish Health Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2010;67:850–5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nakata A, Takahashi M, Ikeda T, et al. Active and passive smoking and depression among Japanese workers. Prev Med 2008;46:451–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wilson DG. Letter: mental effects of secondhand smoke. N Engl J Med 1975;292:596 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hammen C. Stress and depression. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2005;1:293–319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Korea National Statistical Office Annual Report on Cause of Death Statistics. Deajeon; 2012
  • 19.Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Report on the seventh Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-based Survey Statistics 2011. Cheongwon; 2012 [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guidelines for using the seventh Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-based Survey datasets. Cheongwon, 2012 [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Reliability and validity of the Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-based Survey Questionnaire. Cheongwon, 2009 [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fergusson DM, Goodwin RD, Horwood LJ. Major depression and cigarette smoking: results of a 21-year longitudinal study. Psychol Med 2003;33:1357–67 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Goodman E, Capitman J. Depressive symptoms and cigarette smoking among teens. Pediatrics 2000;106:748–55 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Albers AB, Biener L. The role of smoking and rebelliousness in the development of depressive symptoms among a cohort of Massachusetts adolescents. Prev Med 2002;34:625–31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bandiera FC. What are candidate biobehavioral mechanisms underlying the association between secondhand smoke exposure and mental health? Med Hypotheses 2011;77:1009–10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Li S, Kim KY, Kim JH, et al. Chronic nicotine and smoking treatment increases dopamine transporter mRNA expression in the rat midbrain. Neurosci Lett 2004;363:29–32 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Li SP, Park MS, Kim JH, et al. Chronic nicotine and smoke treatment modulate dopaminergic activities in ventral tegmental area and nucleus accumbens and the gamma-aminobutyric and type B receptor expression of the rat prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci Res 2004;78:868–79 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pahl K, Brook JS, Koppel J, et al. Unexpected benefits: pathways from smoking restrictions in the home to psychological well-being and distress among urban black and Puerto Rican Americans. Nicotine Tob Res 2011;13:706–13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Author's manuscript
Reviewer comments

Articles from BMJ Open are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES