Abstract
Background
Paspalum dilatatum Poir. (common name dallisgrass) is a native grass species of South America, with special relevance to dairy and red meat production. P. dilatatum exhibits higher forage quality than other C4 forage grasses and is tolerant to frost and water stress. This species is predominantly cultivated in an apomictic monoculture, with an inherent high risk that biotic and abiotic stresses could potentially devastate productivity. Therefore, advanced breeding strategies that characterise and use available genetic diversity, or assess germplasm collections effectively are required to deliver advanced cultivars for production systems. However, there are limited genomic resources available for this forage grass species.
Results
Transcriptome sequencing using second-generation sequencing platforms has been employed using pooled RNA from different tissues (stems, roots, leaves and inflorescences) at the final reproductive stage of P. dilatatum cultivar Primo. A total of 324,695 sequence reads were obtained, corresponding to c. 102 Mbp. The sequences were assembled, generating 20,169 contigs of a combined length of 9,336,138 nucleotides. The contigs were BLAST analysed against the fully sequenced grass species of Oryza sativa subsp. japonica, Brachypodium distachyon, the closely related Sorghum bicolor and foxtail millet (Setaria italica) genomes as well as against the UniRef 90 protein database allowing a comprehensive gene ontology analysis to be performed. The contigs generated from the transcript sequencing were also analysed for the presence of simple sequence repeats (SSRs). A total of 2,339 SSR motifs were identified within 1,989 contigs and corresponding primer pairs were designed. Empirical validation of a cohort of 96 SSRs was performed, with 34% being polymorphic between sexual and apomictic biotypes.
Conclusions
The development of genetic and genomic resources for P. dilatatum will contribute to gene discovery and expression studies. Association of gene function with agronomic traits will significantly enable molecular breeding and advance germplasm enhancement.
Introduction
Paspalum dilatatum Poir. (common name dallisgrass) is a highly productive C4 grass with a wide distribution within temperate-warm regions and a growing season from late spring to late summer. P. dilatatum belongs to the Panicoideae subfamily within the PACMAD clade (Panicoideae, Arundinoideae, Chloridoideae, Micrairoideae, Aristidoideae and Danthonioideae), which contains all C4 grasses. It is believed that the PACMAD clade separated from the lineage that generated the more widely studied Pooideae and Bambusoideae grasses some 40–50 million years ago (Mya) [1]. Recently the C4 grasses have attracted considerable interest for bioenergy production and several of the key species under investigation (Miscanthus giganteus; Panicum virgatum; Pennisetum purpuretum) belong to the Paniceae clade and have probably diverged from the P. dilatatum clade by only c. 20 Mya. P. dilatatum is native to South America with special relevance to dairy and beef production [2], [3] as its forage quality is higher than that of other C4 forage grasses [4], [5], [6], and it exhibits tolerance of frost [7], [8] and water stress [9], [10].
There are several sexual and apomictic cytotypes (4×, 5×, 6×, 7×) and also biotypes of P. dilatatum that have been identified due to their morphological and distributional differences [11]. The predominant biotype found has purple anthers and apomictic reproduction (2n = 50), which is widespread in South America and naturalised in other parts of the world including China, USA, India, Japan, New Zealand and South Africa [12]. The sexual biotypes are typically characterised by yellow anthers. The genome constitution of the different ploidy levels has been described as IIJJ for tetraploids and IIJJX for the more common pentaploid biotype [13], [14]. The I genome has been identified in the diploid P. intermedium [15], which is believed to be the progenitor of the original genome donor. Cytogenic and phylogenic studies suggest that the donor of the J genome is believed to be P. juergensii [16]. The donor of the X genome is unknown, though the apomictic character is thought to have originated from this genome. The genome size has been estimated in different biotypes of P. dilatatum, with the tetraploid and pentaploid genome contents being 2.43 pg/2C and 2.96 pg/2C per nucleus, respectively [11].
P. dilatatum is likely to have more widespread use in livestock grazing systems under predicted climate change scenarios due to its superior drought tolerance and water use efficiency, in comparison to commonly-used C3 grasses. However, conventional breeding methods for improvement of P. dilatatum are commonly limited by its asexual reproduction system [17]. In apomictic reproduction, seeds are produced without fertilisation, generating uniform progeny that are genetically identical to their parents, restricting the genetic variation available for conventional breeding programs. As a result of this apomictic character, large clonal monocultures are often maintained in production zones, potentially jeopardising the feed-base of the grazing industries if adverse biotic or abiotic pressures emerge. The common type of P. dilatatum (apomictic and pentaploid) has a documented susceptibility to Claviceps paspali, an ergot fungus, which is the causal agent of “Paspalum staggers” in cattle that graze infected pasture [18]. To address these issues, advanced novel breeding strategies that employ genetic diversity must be developed and enabled to ensure the production of advanced cultivars to generate options for production systems.
Previous efforts to improve dallisgrass through breeding include the use of somaclonal variation [19], [20], [21] and interspecific hybridisation [22], [23]. Advanced molecular breeding techniques may be applied to the sexual cytotype or potentially to hybrids produced with the apomictic biotypes as pollen donors or with other closely related Paspalum species. Molecular markers are a valuable tool to identify and quantify genetic diversity within and between species, populations and available germplasm. These genetic resources can also link genotypes with economically important traits and assist breeders with germplasm selection and potential crossing schemes [24].
Genomic and transcriptomic resources for P. dilatatum are limited to only 77 nucleotide and 37 protein sequences. More broadly in the genus Paspalum the number of nucleotide sequences that are available is only 3,472 (NCBI 05/11/2013). Therefore, there is a significant need to increase the genomic resources for this species. Recently, second generation sequencing technology has been applied in a wide variety of areas including whole genome resequencing and de novo sequencing; as well as transcriptome analysis [25]. The Roche 454 Life Sciences GS FLX sequencing platform has been widely used for transcriptomic studies in non-model organisms (a full list of publications is directly available from http://454.com/publications/index.asp) [26], [27], [28]. Complete genome sequences have been generated for only a few grasses, as despite the advances made, undertaking to produce a whole genome sequence of a higher plant is still a significant task that requires considerable resources. The genome sequences of particular interest when studying Paspalum species are Sorghum bicolor L. [29] and foxtail millet, Setaria italica [30]. Both of these species are likely to have diverged from the Paspalum clade c. 10 Mya and represent two highly relevant genomes for enhancing any generated data. These two related reference genomes could assist in sequence annotation of P. dilatatum. Due to the complexities of undertaking complete sequencing of genomes from higher plants, transcriptomic sequencing of P. dilatatum would generate an initial resource of gene sequences as well as identifying valuable molecular markers such as EST-Simple Sequence Repeats (SSRs) for molecular breeding to improve the productivity and quality of this forage species.
The use of the second-generation sequencing technology is a cost-effective method to obtain large-scale EST sequences of non-model species. For the generation of a resource of largely full length sequences derived from transcriptomics, the longer read length of the GS FLX Titanium chemistry is ideally suited to generate such a data set. The GS FLX platform is the most widely used technology for the identification of SSR motifs and the development of molecular markers in plants [31]. EST-derived simple sequence repeat (SSR) molecular markers have the advantage that by definition they are genic and therefore can be potentially associated with functional regions, avoiding the non-coding and repetitive DNA in species with large genomes. EST-based molecular markers might also be linked to genes controlling important agronomic traits that could assist breeding programs and have been used to improve crop species [32], [33], [34]. Furthermore, due to their conserved location, EST-SSR can be transferable between related species [34]. A recent study has developed a cohort of 17 genomic SSR markers for Paspalum atratum Swallen and Paspalum notatum Flüggé. These SSRs were evaluated broadly across the Paspalum genus allowing species variability to be distinguished [35].
This study provides the first de novo assembly and annotation of a cDNA transcriptome dataset for P. dilatatum, derived from multiple tissues of a single plant at the reproductive stage of its life cycle. An extensive collection of EST-SSR molecular markers have subsequently been identified and a subset validated. This has generated a valuable resource of gene sequences and molecular markers for future breeding programs for this important forage species.
Materials and Methods
Plant material and growth conditions
P. dilatatum cv. Primo, a tetraploid sexually-reproductive cultivar and P. dilatatum cv. Relincho, a pentaploid apomictic cultivar, were kindly provided by Gustavo Schrauf (University of Buenos Aires, Argentina) and used as source plant material for all experiments. Individual plants were grown under glasshouse conditions (21°C, 14 h photoperiod/14°C, 10 h dark period). Plant tissues were harvested for RNA isolation from a single clone of P. dilatatum cv. Primo at the late reproductive stage, from leaves, stems, roots and mature inflorescences.
RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis
Total RNA was isolated using RNeasy® Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following manufacturer's instructions. RNA integrity was visually assessed on a 1% (w/v) agarose gel stained with SYBR® Safe DNA gel stain (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, USA), before proceeding with cDNA synthesis. A total of 250 ng of total RNA from each RNA extraction was combined to provide a total of 1 µg for use in cDNA synthesis using the SMART™ cDNA Synthesis kit (Clontech Laboratories, Mountain View, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Messenger RNA (mRNA) was reverse-transcribed using SMARTScribe™ Reverse Transcriptase and SMART IV™ oligonucleotides. A modified poly-T primer sequence (5′-AAGCAGTGGTATCAACGCAGAGTCGCAGTCGGTACTTTTTTCTTTTTTV-3′) was used instead of the CDS-II primer to reduce sequencing problems associated with the poly-A tails [36].
EST sequence generation
Approximately 5 µg of the amplified cDNA library was sheared by nebulisation at 200 kPa for 2 min. The concentration and integrity of the nebulised cDNA sample was determined using a Bioanalyzer 2100, with a DNA 12000 Labchip (Agilent, Santa Clara, USA) according to manufacturer's instructions. The GS-FLX titanium shotgun sequence library was then prepared following the manufacturer's instructions (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland). The quality of sequencing library was then assessed using a Bioanalyzer 2100, fitted with an RNA 6000 Pico Lab Chip (Agilent) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Quantification of the sequence library was performed using quantitative real-time PCR. Emulsions were prepared using the Large Volume Emulsion PCR Kit (Roche Diagnostics). Finally, enriched beads were loaded onto one half of a picotitre plate for sequencing following the manufacturer's protocol.
Assembly and annotation
Primary sequence output has been deposited in the sequence read archive of GenBank (accession number SRR1012849). Adapter and poly A sequences were trimmed from all sequence reads and the sequences were then de novo assembled, both procedures were performed using Newbler v 2.0.01.14 software (Roche Diagnostics). The coding sequences (CDS) from Oryza sativa japonica v6.1, Sorghum bicolour v1.0, Brachypodium distachyon v1.0 and Setaria italica v2.1 were downloaded from the GenBank and Phytozome websites (www.phytozome.net) and converted into a local custom BLAST database. The P. dilatatum sequence contigs were then used as the query sequences in a BLASTn analysis with a threshold E-value of 10−10. Only the most significant match was recorded for each sequence contig.
The UniRef 90 (www.ebi.ac.uk/uniref/) protein database was downloaded and converted into a custom BLAST database. The P. dilatatum sequence contigs were used as queries using BLASTx analysis with a threshold E-value of 10−10 and the most significant matches were recorded. Gene Ontology (GO) classification was assigned for each contig that matched the Oryza sativa protein database.This was performed by selecting the rice gene IDs that were identified from the initial BLASTn analysis and extracting the GO terms for that subset of genes.
EST-SSR Identification and validation
Identification of di-, tri-, tetra-, penta- and hexanucleotide SSR loci, with minimum repeat numbers of 6, 4, 3, 3, and 3, respectively, and design of corresponding primers was performed using Batch Primer 3 software (http://probes.pw.usda.gov/batchprimer3/). The parameters for primer design were as follows: primer length range = 18 to 23 nucleotides (21 optimum); optimum annealing temperature = 55°C; GC content 30–70% (50% optimum).
A collection of 96 primer pairs were synthesized for empirical testing. Forward primers were synthesised with the addition of the M13 sequence to the 5′ end, to enable fluorescent tail addition through the PCR amplification process [37]. Genomic DNA was extracted from fresh leaf tissue from a collection of 49 genotypes from P. diltatum cv. Primo and one sample from P. dilatatum cv. Relincho using the DNeasy® 96 Plant Kit (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturers' instructions. PCR reactions were performed in a 12 µL volume containing Immolase PCR buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 200 µM dNTPs, 0.016 µM of M13 FAM universal primer, 0.041 µM of M13 tailed forward primer and 0.16 µM of reverse primer, 0.25 units of Immolase DNA polymerase (Bioline, London, UK) and approximately 10 ng of P. dilatatum genomic DNA. Cycling conditions were as follows: 95°C for 10 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 sec, 55°C for 30 sec and 72°C for 30 sec and a final elongation step of 72°C for 10 min, performed using an Applied Biosystems Geneamp 9700 thermal cycler (Life Technologies). Amplification products were diluted 40-fold with the addition of water, and 2 µL of product was then combined with 8.95 µL of Hi-Di™ formamide (Life Technologies) and 0.05 µL of GeneScan™ 500 LIZ® Size Standard (Life Technologies). PCR products were processed using an ABI3730xl DNA analyser and amplification product sizes were determined using GeneMapper® v 3.7 software (Life Technologies).
Results
EST sequencing and de novo assembly
After initial sequence base calling and quality assessment had been performed, a total of 324,695 sequence reads, generating a total of 102,539,862 nucleotides were obtained. The average and modal sequence lengths were 338 and 430 nucleotides, respectively.
After further quality filtering by removing adapter and primer sequences, reads were de novo assembled resulting in 20,169 contigs of a combined length of 9,336,138 bp and 32,751 singletons (Fasta Files S1, S2). The contig length varied from 104 to 7,877 bp. The majority of the contigs varied in length from 200–499 bp (60.9%) with the largest proportion being 300–399 bp (25%; Figure 1A). A total of 5,580 contigs (25%) were identified with a length greater than 500 nucleotides. The majority of the contigs (72.8%) were derived from less than 10 reads (Figure 1B).
The minimum accepted sequence length from the unassembled singletons was 50 bp. The average sequence length of the singletons was 374 bp and the largest proportion of the singletons (26.7%) were between 300–399 bp in length and only 25.6% were longer than 400 bp. There were a total of 17 singleton reads (1.8%) that were longer than 600 bp and represent sequences with long repeats of single nucleotides (Figure 1C).
Gene annotation
The P. dilatatum sequence contig dataset was reciprocally analysed, using the BLASTn algorithm against the CDS data sets of the relevant grass species with whole genome sequences. These data sets were Oryza sativa subsp. japonica (v6.1), Brachypodium distachyon (v1 assembly), Sorghum bicolor (v1.0 release, Sbi1.4 gene set) and foxtail millet (Setaria italica v2.1). This analysis revealed that 45.4% of the P. dilatatum cDNA contigs matched O. sativa genes; 43.7% matched B. distachyon genes, 56.2% matched S. bicolor genes and 62.5% matched CDS sequences from the foxtail millet assembly (Figure 2 and Table S1). A total of 7,994 (39.6%) of the P. dilatatum contigs had significant BLASTn matches to sequences from all of the reference genomes, while 7,229 (35.8%) failed to find a significant match sequences from any of the reference genomes.
The contigs were compared against the UniRef 90 protein database using the BLASTx algorithm with an E-value cutoff of 10−10 to assign putative functional roles and annotations to the P. dilatatum trascriptome data set (Table S1). A total of 11,417 contigs (56.6%) identified a protein from the uniref data base. Gene ontology (GO) terms were also assigned for the subset of contigs that matched the rice genome. Unigenes were classified into three GO terms: biological process, molecular function and cellular component. A total of 76,093 gene counts and 104,741 annotation counts were assigned. The majority of assignments belonged to the biological process ontology (41.4%) followed by molecular function (34.1%) and cellular components (24.5%). Among the biological process category, response to stress (12%) was the most highly represented category, followed by response to endogenous stimulus (7%), nucleotide binding (7%), cellular process (7%) and signal transduction (7%). Other functional classifications were represented at proportions less than 5% of the total (Figure 3A). In the molecular function classification class, catalytic activity (12%), protein binding (12%), hydrolase activity (11%), kinase activity (9%) and transferase activity (8%) constituted the major categories (Figure 3B). The mitochondrion (14%), plasma membrane (14%) and membrane (15%) categories of the cellular component ontology contributed to the largest proportion of annotations followed by nucleus (12%), cytoplasm (8%) and plastid (7%) (Figure 3C).
EST-SSR discovery and validation
The assembled contigs from the EST transcript data were chosen for SSR discovery and validation. Moderate length of sequence is required for SSR motif identification and reliable amplification following primer design. In addition to this, unique locus status for each SSR is desirable, which is best served through analysis of the assembled contigs to avoid partial sequences of ESTs. The 20,169 contigs were processed through batch Primer 3 software for motif identification and design. A total of 2,339 EST-simple sequence repeats (SSR) motifs (di-, tri-, tetra-, penta- or hexa-nucleotide) were identified from a total of 1,989 contigs (11.6%). The most frequent SSRs motifs in P. dilatatum transcriptome data set were tri-nucleotide repeats (Figure 4).
High quality primers were designed using BatchPrimer 3 software and a sub-set of 96 primer pairs were synthesised and used for empirical validation. All identified SSRs along with the designed primers are provided in table S2. Initial testing of the SSRs was performed on a single DNA sample from a distinct plant of the sexual tetraploid cultivar Primo and a DNA sample from the asexual apomictic cv. Relincho. Acceptable performance, defined as generation of distinct amplification products when resolved through capillary electrophoresis, was obtained for 64% of the SSRs that underwent initial validation. An additional collection of 48 plants from cv. Primo were screened with the selected SSR markers. The data from both rounds of SSR marker analysis was combined. A total of 32 SSR markers were able to identify variation between the sexual and apomictic cultivars, whilst the remaining markers only generated monomorphic marker profiles across all of the samples tested. Within these 32 SSR markers, a subset of eight identified polymorphic features within the samples from the cultivar Primo. The SSR markers typically generated fewer products from samples from cv. Primo than Relincho with median values of 2 and 3 respectively (Table 1).
Table 1. Details of SSR molecular markers from P. dilatatum validated as polymorphic within the current study.
SSR Id | Contig | Predicted Product size | SSR Motif | Motif Lenght | Forward Primer | Reverse Primer | Allele size range | Polymorphic in cv. Primo | Number of alleles in cv.Primo | Number of alleles in cv. Relincho |
Pd0061 | contig00359 | 128 | AGGAGC | 6 | GCAGCTTCATCTCTATGTTTC | CTACATCAGGAGTAAGCGATG | 139–149 | No | 1 | 4 |
Pd0228 | contig01406 | 177 | GGT | 3 | CTTCATTCCTTCAGATCCACT | TACACTGCATACACCGAAGA | 153–205 | No | 4 | 5 |
Pd0240 | contig01488 | 227 | CCGA | 4 | AAACTGATGCTCCTCAACC | GTACAGCGGGTTGTTCTG | 333–377 | No | 2 | 3 |
Pd0297 | contig01864 | 157 | CTGTGG | 6 | GTCCTCCTAGCTGTTGAAGAT | AGAAAAGACCTAAGCATGGAC | 169–175 | No | 2 | 3 |
Pd0298 | contig01883 | 126 | CGC | 3 | CAAGATCCCTCCCTACTCC | ACATAGTCCTCCCCAACC | 143–181 | No | 1 | 2 |
Pd0410 | contig02637 | 165 | TCG | 3 | GTCACCTCCTTATAGCCCTTA | CAAATCCAAAGACGATGC | 180–187 | No | 1 | 2 |
Pd0630 | contig04101 | 170 | GCGA | 4 | AAGAGCTTCCCAACATCC | GATATTTCGGAGGAAGAAGAG | 440–465 | No | 2 | 3 |
Pd0741 | contig04909 | 181 | TCT | 3 | GTGGATGGATGGATGGAT | TTCAGACACACTGCATCAAC | 182–204 | Yes | 4 | 3 |
Pd0778 | contig05150 | 184 | GCGGAG | 6 | CTGAAGCAAGGGTAGGAGAT | ATCTCCTCCTGAGTTTGTACC | 196–202 | Yes | 2 | 2 |
Pd0806 | contig05407 | 157 | GGA | 3 | AGGAGTGAGAGGAAGAACAAC | GATGACACAAGCAGTAGCAG | 175–189 | No | 1 | 2 |
Pd1298 | contig09623 | 154 | GAG | 3 | TCCACCAAGAGCTCACAT | GCATCTGTCGTAGACTCGTAG | 118–225 | No | 3 | 5 |
Pd1302 | contig09667 | 183 | CCTGTG | 6 | CAAGGTCATGTTCAACCTCTA | ACAGCACAAGAGCTAAAACC | 175–236 | No | 2 | 3 |
Pd1357 | contig10112 | 176 | AGC | 3 | ATCATTTTTGCTGCTCTCTC | AGTATGGGAGGACGTTGTT | 186–194 | Yes | 2 | 3 |
Pd1389 | contig10385 | 159 | CGG | 3 | CTCAGCTCCTAGTCGTCCTA | ACATTGCGGATAAATCTGAC | 170–177 | Yes | 2 | 1 |
Pd1437 | contig10830 | 150 | GCA | 3 | CAACTTCACCAACAGCAAC | TGCTTATTCTTTCTGCGTTC | 135–174 | No | 2 | 3 |
Pd1480 | contig11038 | 167 | CGG | 3 | ATCAGAAAGAGGGATTTTGC | AAATCAGGGCAAAGAGGTAG | 182–185 | No | 1 | 2 |
Pd1488 | contig11123 | 157 | AAGAGG | 6 | CTCCTGGCTTCCTAGATTTAC | CAATTGAAACATGGTCTGC | 173–189 | Yes | 2 | 2 |
Pd1505 | contig11302 | 149 | CGAGCA | 6 | ATCTTGCTCCATCACCATTA | CTTGTCTCCTACCTCACCAC | 150–166 | No | 1 | 3 |
Pd1515 | contig11456 | 160 | CCG | 3 | AGTCCACTTTCACTTCCACTC | CTCTCCATCCTGCACCTC | 171–179 | No | 2 | 4 |
Pd1533 | contig11692 | 153 | GGC | 3 | GGTCTTGAGGAGTGAGAGC | GAGAGAAAGCTAGGGTTTTGA | 248–267 | No | 3 | 4 |
Pd1594 | contig12224 | 160 | GCA | 3 | TCAGTAGGACACACAACATCA | TAGTAGTTGGACGGATTTGAG | 165–174 | Yes | 4 | 2 |
Pd1602 | contig12343 | 122 | GCG | 3 | ACTTCCGCTTCTTGTTGAT | ATCCAAGTCTAGGGTTCCAC | 121–138 | No | 1 | 3 |
Pd1740 | contig13647 | 148 | AGCC | 4 | GGGATTATACAAATGGAGGAG | TGTTCGATTCTCATCAGTAGG | 156–163 | No | 1 | 2 |
Pd1838 | contig14705 | 162 | TTTGTG | 6 | GAGATGTAATAGCGGTGTTTG | CTCAGCTCCACAGTCACAC | 176–183 | No | 1 | 1 |
Pd1887 | contig15149 | 140 | TCA | 3 | GGACCAGCAGACACAAAC | CCACATCTTCACCTCTCTCTC | 269–271 | No | 1 | 2 |
Pd1907 | contig15377 | 139 | CCG | 3 | ACAAGGCCAGAAGGGTTT | CAAAAGCAGTGGCAAGAG | 150–153 | No | 1 | 1 |
Pd2162 | contig18221 | 176 | GCG | 3 | GTTGTACCTGATGGTGTTGTC | CCGATCAAGGGTTTCCTC | 289–298 | Yes | 2 | 2 |
Pd2239 | contig18901 | 148 | CAT | 3 | GCTGCTGTTATTCTGTACCTG | CCTTCTCTTTCTCTCCAAGAC | 160–166 | Yes | 2 | 2 |
Pd2251 | contig19078 | 150 | CGG | 3 | CTTCTGGTCGTAGGTGTAGTC | CTCCCCCTTCTTCACTCC | 248–264 | No | 2 | 4 |
Pd2273 | contig19311 | 155 | GTCCCC | 6 | ACCGCCAAAAACCAAGAG | CTTCTTCTCCGCCTTCTC | 166–177 | No | 1 | 4 |
Pd2337 | contig20145 | 116 | GCG | 3 | GGAAGGATTCTCTCCCTAGA | CTTCTTGTTGCCGAAGAAT | 128–131 | No | 1 | 2 |
Pd2338 | contig20158 | 153 | GTG | 3 | GTCTGCGGCTCTTCTATTC | AAATGGACTAGAACCTCGAAC | 168–203 | No | 2 | 4 |
Discussion
Efforts to sequence grass genomes have increased considerably in recent years. The first crop species with a complete genome sequence was rice [38], followed by several other species within the Poaceae: sorghum [29], maize [39], brachypodium [40], and most recently foxtail millet [30]. In addition, there are large collections of EST sequences available from species within the Poaceae family (7,180,207 nucleotides ESTs, 20/07/2013) along with collections of next generation RNA sequence based data (1,791 entries in the SRA database 20/07/2013). However, the majority of these studies in recent times have focused on maize (>1,000 of the RNA based SRA entries for the Poaceae). An EST sequencing approach can provide a valuable collection of cDNA sequences and has been widely used for gene discovery and development of molecular markers, as it is a rapid, cost effective approach that can avoid well known problems associated with repetitive regions and large genome sizes in many non-model organisms where no prior data is available. Even though complete genome sequences have now been generated for some grasses, there are >11,000 recognised species within the Poaceae [41] so it is not surprising that genomic resources have been limited for most grass species, including P. dilatatum, prior to this study.
Next generation sequencing has been widely used within many crop species due to its low cost and greater sequence yield [42]. The availability of next generation sequencing technology enables large sequence data sets to be generated at modest costs. However, de novo sequencing of complex, often repetitive genomes, which are common in the Poaceae family, is not trivial. The characterization of genes with low expression levels or genes induced by specific environmental cues, or with spatially-restricted expression patterns can be challenging. Sequencing technologies that generate short reads (35–150 bp) such as the Illumina HiSeq systems are ideally suited to model organisms where reads can be mapped to reference genomes or transcriptome sequences. However, as the GS FLX platform can generate reads of >400 bp, it has been used for de novo annotation in non-model plants such as olive [42], [43], chestnut [44], ginseng [45],strawberry [46], bracken fern [47] and recently, in switchgrass [48].
This study reports the generation of genetic resources for P. dilatatum using the GS FLX Titanium platform. The EST-dataset generated in the current study provides a significant contribution towards the development of a resource in P. dilatatum that facilitates gene discovery and molecular marker development, for breeding programs. The study also provides a basis for future studies into gene expression under specific conditions with biotic or abiotic stresses. The GS FLX platform has a high error rate in homopolymeric regions (i.e., three or more consecutive identical DNA bases) caused by accumulated light intensity variance [49]. Therefore, a modified primer with an interrupted poly d(T) tail was used to avoid the limitations in sequence quality caused by the poly(A) tails of messenger RNA molecules. Similar approaches have been used in other transcriptome studies with significant benefits [45], [50].
The data generated was of high quality as the majority of the generated sequence reads assembled into contigs (74%) with an average contig length of 463 bp; which is also comparable to the average contig length obtained in previous studies (454 bp [51], 334 bp [49], 440 bp [45]. There were still however a significant proportion of sequence reads that were not assembled into contigs and indicate that further transcriptomic studies could benefit the sequence assembly and provide a comprehensive catalogue of full length cDNA sequences, and also unequivocally identify low quality uninformative reads. A small proportion of singleton reads were longer than 600 bp, a length that is outside of the standard read length of the GS FLX 454 platform using Titanium chemistry. These sequences contain long repeats of single nucleotides, which increases the defined length of the read passed the expected output size. It is likely that these sequence reads are an artefact of the sequencing process and are not derived from P. dilatatum, even though they have passed through the standard pipeline approach to sequence quality filtering.
Results of comparative sequence analysis reflects taxonomic relationships, with a high proportion of P. dilatatum reads matching sequences from other members of the Panicoideae subfamily within the PACMAD clade, (Sorghum bicolor L. and Setaria italica). From the recent comprehensive and robust assessment of molecular phylogeny for the grass species [41], it would appear that the closest taxonomic relationship is between P. dilatatum and Sorghum bicolor L. However, this taxonomic relationship is not mirrored by the comparative sequence analysis performed in this study, where the highest number of matching sequence reads was obtained from comparisons to Setaria italica. This could indicate gene specific evolution that S. bicolour has undergone in isolation or potentially some differences in genome assembly and annotation between the two reference genomes. By undertaking the comparative genetic analysis within this study a significant description of the generated cDNA sequences has been attempted. Whilst this study has not focussed on single genes, it is anticipated that the resources generated, the gene ontology, protein as well as the reference genome analysis, will provide assistance to trait specific studies in the future.
Despite being described in plant species since 1992 [52], SSR markers are still widely used for many applications, including population genetics and marker assisted breeding due to their codominant and highly polymorphic nature [53]. EST-SSRs have previously been associated with agronomically important traits in many species including cotton and maize [54], [55]. De novo development of a large cohort of SSRs was previously a costly and time-consuming process [56], [57]. However, SSRs can now be rapidly identified in EST databases generated by sequencing of transcriptomes. EST-SSRs have an enhanced cross-species transferability and efficiency of amplification in comparison with SSRs located in non-transcribed regions [58], [59], which could derive significant benefits for the c. 400 other Paspalum species [60]. A small cohort of genomic derived SSR markers were recently developed for P. atratum Swallen and P. notatum Flüggé and successfully transferred in 35 Paspalum species [35]. The use of SSRs across related species has been previously demonstrated in the Poaceae family: wheat EST-derived SSRs were transferable to eight related species [61] and to important crops including maize, barley and rice [62]. Barley (Hordeum vulgare) EST-derived SSRs were transferable to H. chilense lines and showed polymorphism [63]. The amplification of multiple products from tetraploid genotypes of P. dilatatum and amplification of even more products from pentaploid genotype in this study indicates that SSR markers are able to detect loci within the I, J and X genomes of P. dilatatum.
The frequency of EST- SSRs detected is typically influenced by the DNA template used, the criteria for defining SSRs, and the software and parameters used for identifying SSRs [64], [65], [66]. In this study, the frequency of trinucleotide repeat units was predominant, followed by tetra-, penta-, di- and hexanucleotide repeat units. The high frequency of trinucleotide repeat units is consistent with results previously reported in numerous plant species [67], [68], [69], [70], [71], [72]. Polymorphism in trinucleotide repeats in coding regions of a transcript would be more tolerated as they would not cause shift in the amino acid translation [73].
Conventional plant breeding is a costly and time consuming approach that could be enhanced with molecular marker based system to facilitate the selection of desirable agronomic traits. In apomictic plants, novel approaches for interspecies hybridization must be employed to increase variation and effectively use available germplasm resources. Critically, the selection of germplasm for breeding would benefit from prior genomic characterisation to make informed decisions for cultivar development. As an example the cultivar Primo, used in this study, is characterized with high potential forage production, but was developed based on an interspecific hybridisation and backcross strategy to incorporate C. paspali resistance from P. urvillei (also a sexual tetraploid Paspalum species with a genomic constitution of IIJJ) into P. dilatatum [74]. The application and screening of a modest subset of the discovered SSR markers across the germplasm detailed in this study, has already demonstrated that these SSR are functional across both the sexual and apomictic biotypes of P. dilatatum. However, the low level of SSR marker variance that was identified in this study from multiple samples of Primo could potentially be accounted for by the breeding history of the cultivar, which suggests that the value of the markers may be more accurately assessed by screening a more diverse collection of Paspalum germplasm.
Conclusions
This study generated a substantial genomic EST-derived resource for the forage grass Paspalum dilatatum represented by 20,167 contigs, of which 12,940 have been sequence annotated. Furthermore, a collection of 2,339 SSR primer pairs have been designed and a subset validated for molecular breeding within the cultivated germplasm and can be assessed for efficiency across the genus Paspalum, dramatically advancing the available resources for this important forage grass species.
Supporting Information
Funding Statement
This work was supported by funding from the Victorian Department of Primary Industries, the Dairy Futures Cooperative Research Centre and the Molecular Plant Breeding Cooperative Research Centre. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Christin PA, Samaritani E, Petitpierre B, Salamin N, Besnard G (2009) Evolutionary insights on C4 photosynthetic subtypes in grasses from genomics and phylogenetics. Genome Biol Evol 1: 221–230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Clayton WD (1983) Tropical grasses. In: McIvor JG, Bray RA, editors. Genetic Resources of Forage Plants. Melbourne: CSIRO. pp 39–46. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Harlan JR (1983) The scope for collection and improvement if forage plants. In: McIvor JG, Bray RA, editors. Genetic Resources of Forage Plants. Melbourne: CSIRO.pp3–14. [Google Scholar]
- 4. Holt EC (1956) Dallisgrass. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station EUA Bulletin 829: 14. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hutton EM, Nelson CJ (1968) Plant breeding and genetics. In: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, editors. Some concepts and methods in sub-tropical pasture research. Brisbane: CSIRO. pp 79–92 [Google Scholar]
- 6. Robinson DL, Wheat KG, Hubbert NL, Henderson M, Savoy HJ (1988) Dallisgrass yield, quality and nitrogen recovery responses to nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers. Commun in soil Sci Plant Anal 19: 529–542. [Google Scholar]
- 7. Hacker JB, B.J F, Gow JM (1974) Simulated frosting of tropical grasses. Austr J of Agric Res 25: 45–57. [Google Scholar]
- 8. Davies LJ, Forde BJ (1991) Comparative responses of three subtropical grasses to combined frost and prolonged chilling treatments simulating a New Zealand winter. New Zealand J Agr Res 34: 249–256. [Google Scholar]
- 9. Blom CW, Voesenek LA (1996) Flooding the survival strategies of plants. Trends Ecol Evol 11: 290–295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Jackson MB, Armstrong W (1999) Formation of aerenchyma and the processes of plant ventilation in relation to soil flooding and submergence. Plant Biol 1: 274–287. [Google Scholar]
- 11. Vaio M, Mazzella C, Porro V, Speranza P, Lopez-Carro B, et al. (2007) Nuclear DNA content in allopolyploid species and synthetic hybrids in the grass genus Paspalum . Pl Syst Evol 265: 109–121. [Google Scholar]
- 12. Hayman DL (1956) Cytological evidence for apomixis in Australiam Paspalum dilatatum . Inst Agric Sci J 22: 292–3. [Google Scholar]
- 13. Souza-Chies TT, Essi L, Rua GH, Valls JF, Miz RB (2006) A preliminary approach to the phylogeny of the genus Paspalum (Poaceae). Genetica 126: 15–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Miz BR, TT dS-C (2006) Genetic relationships and variation among biotypes of dallisgrass (Paspalum dilatatum Poir.) and related species using random amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 53: 541–552. [Google Scholar]
- 15. Burson BL (1978) Genome relations between Paspalum conspersum and two diploid Paspalum species. Can J Genet Cytol 20: 365–372. [Google Scholar]
- 16. Burson BL, Lee H, Benett HW (1973) Genome relations between tetraploid Paspalum dilatatum and four diploid Paspalum species. Crop Sci 13: 739–743. [Google Scholar]
- 17. Burton GW, Jackson JE (1962) Radiation breeding of apomictic postrate Dallisgrass, Paspalum dilatatum var. pauciciliatum. Crop Sci 2: 495–497. [Google Scholar]
- 18. Cole RJ, Dorner JW, Lansden JA, Cox RH, Pape C, et al. (1977) Paspalum staggers: isolation and identification of tremorgenic metabolites from sclerotia of Claviceps paspali . J Agric Food Chem 25: 1197–1201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Davies LJ, Cohen D (1992) Phenotipic variation in somaclones of Paspalum dilatatum and their seedling offspring. Can J Plant Science 72: 773–784. [Google Scholar]
- 20. Akashi R, Adachi T (1992) Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from cultured immature inflorescences of apomictic dallisgrass (Paspalum dilatatum Poir.). Plant Sci 82: 219–225. [Google Scholar]
- 21. Burson BL, Tischler CR (1993) Regeneration and somaclonal variation in apomictic Paspalum dilatatum Poir. Euphytica 67: 71–78. [Google Scholar]
- 22. Burton GW (1943) Interspecific hybrids in the genus Paspalum . J Hered 34: 14–23. [Google Scholar]
- 23. Benett HW, Bashaw EC (1966) Interspecific hybridization with Paspalum spp. Crop Sci 6: 52–54. [Google Scholar]
- 24. Gupta PK, Varshney RK (2000) The development and use of microsatellite markers for genetic analysis and plant breeding with emphasis on bread wheat. Euphytica 113: 163–185. [Google Scholar]
- 25. Zhou X, Ren L, Meng Q, Li Y, Yu Y, et al. (2010) The next-generation sequencing technology and application. Prot Cell 1: 520–536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Vera JC, Wheat CW, Fescemyer HW, Frilander MJ, Crawford DL, et al. (2008) Rapid transcriptome characterization for a non model organism using 454 pyrosequencing. Mol Ecol 17: 1636–1647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Garg R, Patel RK, Jhanwar S, Priya P, Bhattacharjee A, et al. (2011) Gene discovery and tissue-specific transcriptome analysis in chickpea with massively parallel pyrosequencing and web resource development. Plant Physiol 156: 1661–1678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Kaur S, Pembleton LW, Cogan NO, Savin KW, Leonforte T, et al. (2012) Transcriptome sequencing of field pea and faba bean for discovery and validation of SSR genetic markers. BMC Genomics 13: 104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Paterson AH, Bowers JE, Bruggmann R, Dubchak I, Grimwood J, et al. (2009) The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses. Nature 457: 551–556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Zhang G, Liu X, Quan Z, Cheng S, Xu X, et al. (2012) Genome sequence of foxtail millet (Setaria italica) provides insights into grass evolution and biofuel potential. Nat Biotechnol 30: 549–554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Zalapa JE, Cuevas H, Zhu H, Steffan S, Senalik D, et al. (2012) Using next-generation sequencing approaches to isolate simple sequence repeat (SSR) loci in the plant sciences. Am J Bot 99: 193–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Park YJ, Lee JK, Kim NS (2009) Simple sequence repeat polymorphisms (SSRPs) for evaluation of molecular diversity and germplasm classification of minor crops. Molecules 14: 4546–4569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Hougaard BK, Madsen LH, Sandal N, de Carvalho Moretzsohn M, Fredslund J, et al. (2008) Legume anchor markers link syntenic regions between Phaseolus vulgaris, Lotus japonicus, Medicago truncatula and Arachis. Genetics 179: 2299–2312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Zeng S, Xiao G, Guo J, Fei Z, Xu Y, et al. (2010) Development of a EST dataset and characterization of EST-SSRs in a traditional Chinese medicinal plant, Epimedium sagittatum (Sieb. Et Zucc.) Maxim. BMC Genomics 11: 94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Cidade FW, Vigna BB, de Souza FH, Valls JF, Dall'agnol M, et al. (2013) Genetic variation in polyploid forage grass: Assessing the molecular genetic variability in the Paspalum genus. BMC Genet 14: 50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Meyer E, Aglyamova GV, Wang S, Buchanan-Carter J, Abrego D, et al. (2009) Sequencing and de novo analysis of a coral larval transcriptome using 454 GSFlx. BMC Genomics 10: 219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Schuelke M (2000) An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nat Biotechnol 18: 233–234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Goff SA, Ricke D, Lan TH, Presting G, Wang R, et al. (2002) A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica). Sci 296: 92–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Schnable PS, Ware D, Fulton RS, Stein JC, Wei F, et al. (2009) The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Sci 326: 1112–1115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Initiative IB (2010) Genome sequencing and analysis of the model grass Brachypodium distachyon . Nature 463: 763–768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Grass Phylogeny Working Group II (2012) New grass phylogeny resolves deep evolutionary relationships and discovers C4 origins. New Phytol 193: 304–312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Wall PK, Leebens-Mack J, Chanderbali AS, Barakat A, Wolcott E, et al. (2009) Comparison of next generation sequencing technologies for transcriptome characterization. BMC Genomics 10: 347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Alagna F, D'Agostino N, Torchia L, Servili M, Rao R, et al. (2009) Comparative 454 pyrosequencing of transcripts from two olive genotypes during fruit development. BMC Genomics 10: 399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Barakat A, DiLoreto DS, Zhang Y, Smith C, Baier K, et al. (2009) Comparison of the transcriptomes of American chestnut (Castanea dentata) and Chinese chestnut (Castanea mollissima) in response to the chestnut blight infection. BMC Plant Biol 9: 51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Sun C, Li Y, Wu Q, Luo H, Sun Y, et al. (2010) De novo sequencing and analysis of the American ginseng root transcriptome using a GS FLX Titanium platform to discover putative genes involved in ginsenoside biosynthesis. BMC Genomics 11: 262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Shulaev V, Sargent DJ, Crowhurst RN, Mockler TC, Folkerts O, et al. (2011) The genome of woodland strawberry (Fragaria vesca). Nat Genet 43: 109–116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Der JP, Barker MS, Wickett NJ, dePamphilis CW, Wolf PG (2011) De novo characterization of the gametophyte transcriptome in bracken fern, Pteridium aquilinum . BMC Genomics 12: 99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Wang Y, Zeng X, Iyer NJ, Bryant DW, Mockler TC, et al. (2012) Exploring the switchgrass transcriptome using second-generation sequencing technology. PLoS One 7: e34225 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034225 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, Attiya S, Bader JS, et al. (2005) Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 437: 376–380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Beldade P, Rudd S, Gruber JD, Long AD (2006) A wing expressed sequence tag resource for Bicyclus anynana butterflies, an evo-devo model. BMC Genomics 7: 130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Franssen SU, Shrestha RP, Brautigam A, Bornberg-Bauer E, Weber AP (2011) Comprehensive transcriptome analysis of the highly complex Pisum sativum genome using next generation sequencing. BMC Genomics 12: 227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Akkaya MS, Bhagwat AA, Cregan PB (1992) Length polymorphisms of simple sequence repeat DNA in soybean. Genetics 132: 1131–1139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Luikart G, England PR, Tallmon D, Jordan S, Taberlet P (2003) The power and promise of population genomics: from genotyping to genome typing. Nat Rev Genet 4: 981–994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Abdurakhmonov IY, Abdullaev AA, Saha S, Buriev ZT, Arslanov D, et al. (2005) Simple sequence repeat marker associated with a natural leaf defoliation trait in tetraploid cotton. J Hered 96: 644–653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Li X, Yang H, Buirchell B, Yan G (2011) Development of a DNA marker tightly linkedto low-alkaloid gene iucundus in narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.) for marker-assisted selection. Crop and Pasture Sci 62: 218–224. [Google Scholar]
- 56. Squirrell J, Hollingsworth PM, Woodhead M, Russell J, Lowe AJ, et al. (2003) How much effort is required to isolate nuclear microsatellites from plants? Mol Ecol 12: 1339–1348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Zane L, Bargelloni L, Patarnello T (2002) Strategies for microsatellite isolation: a review. Mol Ecol 14: 1–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Barbara T, Palma-Silva C, Paggi GM, Bered F, Fay MF, et al. (2007) Cross-species transfer of nuclear microsatellite markers: potential and limitations. Mol Ecol 16: 3759–3767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Kumpatla SP, Mukhopadhyay S (2005) Mining and survey of simple sequence repeats in expressed sequence tags of dicotyledonous species. Genome 48: 985–998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Chase A (1929) The North American species of Paspalum . Contrib US Natl Herbarium 28: 1–310. [Google Scholar]
- 61. Zhang LY, Bernard M, Leroy P, Feuillet C, Sourdille P (2005) High transferability of bread wheat EST-derived SSRs to other cereals. Theor Appl Genet 111: 677–687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Tang J, Gao L, Cao Y, Jia J (2006) Homologous analysis of SSR-ESTs and transferability of wheat SSR-EST markers across barley, rice and maize. Euphytica 151: 87–93. [Google Scholar]
- 63. Castillo A, Budak H, Varshney RK, Dorado G, Graner A, et al. (2008) Transferability and polymorphism of barley EST-SSR markers used for phylogenetic analysis in Hordeum chilense . BMC Plant Biol 8: 97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Parchman TL, Geist KS, Grahnen JA, Benkman CW, Buerkle CA (2010) Transcriptome sequencing in an ecologically important tree species: assembly, annotation, and marker discovery. BMC Genomics 11: 180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Castoe TA, Poole AW, Gu W, Jason de Koning AP, Daza JM, et al. (2010) Rapid identification of thousands of copperhead snake (Agkistrodon contortrix) microsatellite loci from modest amounts of 454 shotgun genome sequence. Mol Ecol Resour 10: 341–347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Tangphatsornruang S, Somta P, Uthaipaisanwong P, Chanprasert J, Sangsrakru D, et al. (2009) Characterization of microsatellites and gene contents from genome shotgun sequences of mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). BMC Plant Biol 9: 137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Eujayl I, Sledge MK, Wang L, May GD, Chekhovskiy K, et al. (2004) Medicago truncatula EST-SSRs reveal cross-species genetic markers for Medicago spp. Theor Appl Genet 108: 414–422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Varshney RK, Thiel T, Stein N, Langridge P, Graner A (2002) In silico analysis on frequency and distribution of microsatellites in ESTs of some cereal species. Cell Mol Biol Lett 7: 537–546. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. La Rota M, Kantety RV, Yu JK, Sorrells ME (2005) Non random distribution and frequencies of genomic and EST-derived microsatellite markers in rice, wheat, and barley. BMC Genomics 6: 23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Gao L, Tang J, Li H, Jia J (2003) Analysis of microsatellites in major crops assessed by computational and experimental approaches. Mol Breeding 12: 245–261. [Google Scholar]
- 71. Thiel T, Michalek W, Varshney RK, Graner A (2003) Exploiting EST databases for the development and characterization of gene-derived SSR-markers in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theor Appl Genet 106: 411–422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Cardle L, Ramsay L, Milbourne D, Macaulay M, Marshall D, et al. (2000) Computational and experimental characterization of physically clustered simple sequence repeats in plants. Genetics 156: 847–854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Metzgar D, Bytof J, Wills C (2000) Selection against frameshift mutations limits microsatellite expansion in coding DNA. Genome Res 10: 72–80. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Schrauf GE, Blanco MA, Cornaglia PS, Deregibus VA, Madia M, et al. (2003) Ergot resistance in plants of Paspalum dilatatum incorporated by hybridisation with Paspalum urvillei . Trop Grasslands 37: 182–186. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.