Abstract
Two major theories of the evolution of senescence (mutation accumulation and antagonistic pleiotropy) make different predictions about the relationships between age, inbreeding effects, and the magnitude of genetic variance components of life-history components. We show that, under mutation accumulation, inbreeding decline and three major components of genetic variance are expected to increase with age in randomly mating populations. Under the simplest version of the antagonistic pleiotropy model, no changes in the severity of inbreeding decline, dominance variance, or the genetic variance of chromosomal homozygotes are expected, but additive genetic variance may increase with age. Age-specific survival rates and mating success were measured on virgin males, using lines extracted from a population of Drosophila melanogaster. For both traits, inbreeding decline and several components of genetic variance increase with age. The results are consistent with the mutation accumulation model, but can only be explained by antagonistic pleiotropy if there is a general tendency for an increase with age in the size of allelic effects on these life-history traits.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Charlesworth B. Evolution of senescence: Alzheimer's disease and evolution. Curr Biol. 1996 Jan 1;6(1):20–22. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00411-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hamilton W. D. The moulding of senescence by natural selection. J Theor Biol. 1966 Sep;12(1):12–45. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(66)90184-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Houle D., Hughes K. A., Hoffmaster D. K., Ihara J., Assimacopoulos S., Canada D., Charlesworth B. The effects of spontaneous mutation on quantitative traits. I. Variances and covariances of life history traits. Genetics. 1994 Nov;138(3):773–785. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.3.773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hughes K. A., Charlesworth B. A genetic analysis of senescence in Drosophila. Nature. 1994 Jan 6;367(6458):64–66. doi: 10.1038/367064a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hughes K. A. The inbreeding decline and average dominance of genes affecting male life-history characters in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 1995 Feb;65(1):41–52. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300032997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kondrashov A. S., Houle D. Genotype-environment interactions and the estimation of the genomic mutation rate in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Biol Sci. 1994 Dec 22;258(1353):221–227. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1994.0166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kosuda K. The aging effect on male mating activity in Drosophila melanogaster. Behav Genet. 1985 May;15(3):297–303. doi: 10.1007/BF01065984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morton N. E., Crow J. F., Muller H. J. AN ESTIMATE OF THE MUTATIONAL DAMAGE IN MAN FROM DATA ON CONSANGUINEOUS MARRIAGES. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1956 Nov;42(11):855–863. doi: 10.1073/pnas.42.11.855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mukai T., Cardellino R. A., Watanabe T. K., Crow J. F. The genetic variance for viability and its components in a local population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1974 Dec;78(4):1195–1208. doi: 10.1093/genetics/78.4.1195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Partridge L., Barton N. H. Optimality, mutation and the evolution of ageing. Nature. 1993 Mar 25;362(6418):305–311. doi: 10.1038/362305a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rose M. R., Charlesworth B. Genetics of life history in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Sib analysis of adult females. Genetics. 1981 Jan;97(1):173–186. doi: 10.1093/genetics/97.1.173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simmons M. J., Crow J. F. Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations. Annu Rev Genet. 1977;11:49–78. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.11.120177.000405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]