Abstract
Traumatic brain injury in children commonly involves the frontal lobes, and is associated with distinct structural and behavioral changes. Despite the clinical significance of injuries localized to this region during brain development, the mechanisms underlying secondary damage and long-term recovery are poorly understood. Here we have characterized the first model of unilateral focal traumatic injury to the developing frontal lobe. Male C57Bl/6J mice at postnatal day (p) 21, an age approximating a toddler-aged child, received a controlled cortical impact or sham surgery to the left frontal lobe and were euthanized 1 and 7 d later. A necrotic cavity and local inflammatory response were largely confined to the unilateral frontal lobe, dorsal corpus callosum and striatum anterior to Bregma. While cell death and accumulated beta-amyloid precursor protein were characteristic features of the peri-contusional motor cortex, corpus callosum, cingulum and dorsal striatum, underlying structures including the hippocampus showed no overt pathology. To determine the long-term functional consequences of injury at p21, two additional cohorts were subjected to a battery of behavioral tests in adolescence (p35-45) or adulthood (p70-80). In both cohorts, brain-injured mice showed normal levels of anxiety, sociability, spatial learning and memory. The signature phenotypic features were deficits in motor function and motor learning, coincident with a reduction in ipsilateral cortical brain volumes. Together, these findings demonstrate classic morphological features of a focal traumatic injury, including early cell death and axonal injury, and long-term volumetric loss of cortical volumes. The presence of deficits in sensorimotor function and coordination in the absence of abnormal findings related to anxiety, sociability and memory, likely reflect several variables including the unique location of the injury and the emergence of favorable compensatory mechanisms during subsequent brain development.
Keywords: Traumatic brain injury, frontal lobe, behavior, pathology, development, motor deficit
INTRODUCTION
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of long-term disability in children, especially in males under four years of age. [1]. Young children also show increased vulnerability to injury and the poorest outcomes after TBI, likely due to inherent developmental differences in the immature brain compared to the adult, including reduced anti-oxidant reserves and a prolonged, exacerbated inflammatory response [2-4]. Importantly, neurocognitive deficits often emerge over time in parallel with ongoing brain maturation, potentially interfering with the acquisition of new skills [5]. Lesions to the frontal lobes, frequently seen in young children[6], contribute to impaired executive function, learning, and psychosocial disturbances [6-8]. Supporting these findings is evidence that more extensive fronto-temporal atrophy, as identified by magnetic resonance imaging, is associated with greater disability in children approximately two years after moderate-to-severe TBI [9].
The use of animal models of frontal brain injury has been considerably scarce to date, and limited to the adult or aged brain. Traditionally, the most commonly employed TBI models involve impact to the parietal lobes, either unilaterally or bilaterally, although a limited number of studies have applied bilateral controlled cortical impact (CCI) to the frontal lobes of adult and aged rats [10,11]. Others are investigating injury mechanisms following a unilateral frontal lobe lobotomy by surgical resection or aspiration in adult mice [12,13]. More clinically relevant is a recent modification of the Marmarou impact-acceleration model where an impact is delivered to the anterior cranium of the adult rat. Such an insult produces a characteristic diffuse neuropathology and a reduction in spontaneous exploration for at least one week [14].
To the best of our knowledge, there are currently no rodent models of frontal traumatic injury (i.e. controlled cortical impact (CCI), impact-acceleration or fluid-percussion) to the developing brain. Thus, the aim of this study was to establish a new model of traumatic injury to the frontal lobe of the developing mouse brain. Here we characterize acute and chronic neuropathology and conduct an extensive battery of behavioral assays that collectively profile sensorimotor, cognitive and psychosocial behaviors after CCI to the left frontal lobe at p21. Our findings reveal a characteristic early necrotic and inflammatory response, and a unique signature of motor dysfunction which persists to adulthood, in the absence of cognitive or psychosocial deficits.
METHODS
Animals
All experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF). All histological and behavioral tasks and analyses were conducted randomized and blinded. Male C57BL/6J mice at post-natal day (p) 17 were purchased with an accompanying lactating mother from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME), and housed in institutional standard cages on a 12-h light/12-h dark cycle with ad libitum access to water and food. A total of 66 mice were used in this study. One animal from the adult (3 month) sham-operated cohort was excluded from the study due to the presence of abnormal ventriculomegaly upon sectioning.
Controlled cortical impact model [15]
At p21, pups were weaned and anesthetized by intra-peritoneal injection of 1.25% 2, 2, 2-tribromoethanol (Avertin) diluted in isotonic saline to 0.02 ml/g body weight. Animals from each litter were randomly allocated for either TBI or sham-operation. Each mouse was secured in a stereotaxic frame (David Kopf Instruments, Tujunga, CA) and maintained on a circulating water heating pad during surgery. After a midline skin incision, a 3.5 mm diameter circular craniotomy was performed with a dental drill, positioned left of the midline and 0.5 mm anterior to Bregma. TBI mice were then positioned beneath the injury device (eCCI-6.3, Custom Design and Fabrication, Richmond, VA) and subjected to a CCI injury using a 3.0 mm convex impactor tip at the following parameters: 2.5 m/s velocity, 1.7 mm depth, for 150 ms. The impactor was angled 5° lateral from vertical. Following impact, the scalp was sutured and each mouse administered ~1.0 ml of isotonic saline subcutaneously to prevent post-operative dehydration. Sham-operated mice underwent identical surgical procedures, including craniotomy, without the cortical impact. Following surgery, mice were group-housed (4-5 per cage), and weights were monitored weekly.
Tissue collection and preparation
Brains were collected at either 24 h or 7 d after injury for immunohistochemistry and histology (n=8/TBI, n=5/sham per time point). Brains from two additional cohorts were collected at 1 and 3 months post-injury (n=10/group), upon completion of behavioral assessments. Anesthetized mice were perfused transcardially with ice-cold saline followed by 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Brains were then removed, post-fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde, and transferred into 30% sucrose for 72 h before embedding. Serial coronal sections, spanning the entire frontal and parietal lobes, were collected at either 20 μm (24 h and 7 d) or 40 μm (1 and 3 month cohorts).
Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemistry was performed on 20 μm coronal sections (n=5-7 per brain, 800 μm apart). Sections were thawed and immersed in hydrogen peroxide (either 3% in methanol or 0.3% in PBS), followed by incubation in blocking solution containing 10% species-appropriate serum, 0.2% Triton-X100 and 0.1% bovine serum albumin in PBS. Sections were then incubated overnight at 4 °C in serum-containing blocking solution with the following antibodies: polyclonal rabbit anti-β-amyloid precursor protein (β-APP at 1:500, Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY), goat anti-Iba-1 (1:500, Abcam, Cambridge, MA), rabbit polyclonal anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP at 1:1000, DAKO, Carpinteria, CA) or rabbit polyclonal anti-cleaved caspase-3 (1:1000, Millipore, Billerica, MA). Biotinylated goat anti-rabbit (1:500; Vector Laboratories Inc., Burlingame, CA) or horse anti-goat IgG (1:200) antibodies were subsequently applied, for detection using the Vectastain ABC kit (Vector Laboratories Inc.) and nickel-enhanced 3, 3’-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride. Staining was visualized using a Nikon Optiphot light microscope with Spot™ Imaging Solutions software (Sterling Heights, MI).
Detection of acute cell death
Fluoro-Jade C (FJC) was used to identify acute cell death. Thawed sections were briefly pretreated with 1% sodium hydroxide in ethanol, and then incubated in 0.06% potassium permanganate for 10 min, followed by 0.0001% FJC in 0.1% acetic acid for 10 min. Staining was visualized using a Nikon fluorescent microscope for qualitative assessments. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick 3’-end labeling (TUNEL) was performed on adjacent sections to quantify dying/dead cells, using the in situ Cell Death Detection kit, POD (Roche Applied Science, Indianopolis, IN), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All TUNEL-positive cells at 24 h post-injury were counted on 5 sections per brain and summed, within defined anatomical regions including the dorsal cortex, hippocampus, striatum and corpus callosum, to evaluate the peri-contusional spread of cell death.
Cortical volume measurements
An estimation of intact cortical volumes was performed on 40 μm sections stained with cresyl violet at 1 and 3 months post-injury (12-14 sections per brain, spanning ~3.0 to 0.0 mm Bregma). The unbiased Cavalieri method was employed using StereoInvestigator software (MicroBrightField, Williston, VT, USA), with a grid size of 150 μm and a sampling interval of 6. Measurements were confined to the dorsal ipsilateral and dorsal contralateral cortices, with the inferior boundary defined by a horizontal delineating the most ventromedial point of the corpus callosum. The Gundersen mean coefficient of error for individual estimates was maintained at <0.05. Group means are expressed as estimated volume (mm3).
Behavioral tasks
An extensive battery of behavioral assessments was performed in the below order, for two separate cohorts after sham and TBI: adolescence (p35-45) and adult (p70-80; n=10/group/time point), time points corresponding to brain development milestones and in line with our previously-characterized model of parietal lobe injury. Mice were singly housed and habituated to the testing room 24 h prior to commencement of testing. ‘Stimulus’ animals were naïve male C57Bl/6J mice, purchased at the same time and housed under identical conditions. Each ‘test’ mouse (TBI or sham) encountered a novel stimulus mouse once only.
Rotarod
The accelerating rotarod was performed to assess general motor function and motor learning [16]. The latency to fall was recorded in sec, and mice were tested across three consecutive days, three times per session with an inter-session interval of approximately 1 h.
Open field test
Exploratory behaviors were assessed over a 10 min session in an automated open field arena (Kinder Scientific, Poway, CA), as previously described [16]. Interfaced Motor Monitor software calculated parameters including distance traveled, rearing events, and percentage time spent in the central zone compared to the periphery.
Elevated plus maze and zero mazes
The elevated plus and zero mazes (Kinder Scientific) assess anxiety based upon the natural tendency of rodents to avoid the open arms in preference for enclosed areas [16]. For both tasks, mice were placed individually on the apparatus and allowed free access for 10 min. Total distance moved, and time spent in the open arms, was assessed as previously described [16].
Partition test
The test and stimulus mice were separated by a perforated platform, and investigative time spent by the test mouse at the partition was quantified over a 5 min period as previously described [17,18].
Tube dominance
In this task, test and stimulus mice were released simultaneously into opposite ends of a clear plexiglass tube. Typically, one mouse will exert dominance and force the other to back out of the tube, which is thought to reflect a tendency for aggression [17]. This test was performed as previously described, using a 3.2 cm diameter tube for adult mice and a 2.5 cm tube for adolescents [18]. A win or loss and the trial duration were evaluated, averaged across 3 trials.
Resident-intruder task
To further assess social investigative behaviors, a stimulus mouse was presented into the established home cage of the test mouse, and investigative behaviors were quantified from video recordings as previously described [18,19].
Three-chamber task
The three-chamber paradigm allows for the evaluation of social affiliation and social recognition in mice [18,20]. In brief, 3 × 10 min stages are conducted sequentially: stage 1 involves habituation in the apparatus; stage 2 is the addition of a stimulus mouse, as a test for sociability preferences; and stage 3 involves addition of a second novel stimulus mouse, as a test for social recognition based upon a preference for social novelty. Data were expressed as time spent in each chamber (% of total time).
Morris water maze
The Morris water maze (MWM) was used to assess spatial learning and memory as previously described [16]. Mice underwent two daily sessions, consisting of 3 × 60 sec trials, for 5 consecutive days. During days 1 and 2, the platform was raised above the water surface and clearly labeled with a flag (‘visible platform’). Mice that failed to reach the platform within 60 sec were guided there by the investigator. During days 3, 4 and 5, the platform was submerged below the water surface (‘hidden platform’), such that mice were required to use spatial cues from the room to locate it. The starting location was rotated for each trial. Movements were traced with an overhead mounted video camera interfaced with Noldus EthoVision software, for quantification of distance, latency and velocity. At the conclusion of days 3, 4 and 5, the platform was removed from the pool and a 60 sec ‘probe trial’ was conducted. A fourth probe trial, for long-term memory retention, was also performed one week later. The time spent in the target quadrant (where the platform was previously located) compared to the other quadrants was quantified.
Buried food task
As social behaviors in mice are predominantly mediated by olfactory cues [21], we lastly performed a buried food task to assess the ability of mice to detect a hidden volatile odor, as previously described [18,22].
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using Prism GraphPad v.5.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA), with a significance level of p<0.05. Estimation of cortical volume was analyzed by 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bonferonni’s post-hoc tests as appropriate. Unpaired t-tests or 2-way ANOVA’s were used to compare sham and TBI mice in behavioral tasks, with repeated measures (RM) as appropriate, and factors of injury (TBI or sham) and either session or chamber. Results from post-hoc analyses are stated as p<0.05, p<0.01 or p<0.001 and annotated graphically. All data are expressed as means ± SEM.
RESULTS
Frontal TBI at p21 results in focal hemorrhage and the emergence of a cortical cavity
Apnea was either absent or very short-lived (< 3 sec) following impact to the frontal lobe. Both injured (n= 36) and sham-operated (n= 30) mice recovered from anesthesia without any mortality. Herniation of the brain through the craniotomy was evident immediately after impact. Prominent cortical hemorrhage was apparent at the site of impact at 24 h post-injury, which corresponded to a distinct cortical cavity by 7 days (Fig. 1a, b). No macroscopic damage or hemorrhage was observed in the olfactory bulbs, contralateral hemisphere, brainstem, cerebellum or posterior fossa of either TBI or sham-operated mice. Body weight gains were similar between TBI and sham mice to at least 3 months post-surgery (2-way RM ANOVA effect of injury F1, 18=0.6537, p=0.4293; effect of time, T19, 252=1247, p<0.0001).
Traumatic injury results in acute cortical and subcortical cell injury
FJC and TUNEL were used to evaluate cortical and subcortical patterns of cell injury (Fig. 2a-c). FJC positive cells were most prominent throughout the ipsilateral cortex and dorsal striatum at 24 h after injury, as well as the ipsilateral corpus callosum (Fig. 2a). Although decreased, modest labeling was still evident in the corpus callosum at 7 d (data not shown). TUNEL, which labels fragmented DNA of dead and dying cells, was also widespread at 24 h post-injury, with a distribution similar to FJC (Fig. 2b). Abundant TUNEL-positive cells were evident in the ipsilateral cortex adjacent to site of damage (Fig. 2b), within the underlying corpus callosum, and in the dorsal striatum. Quantification in the ipsilateral hemisphere at 24 h supported these observations of region-dependent vulnerability (Fig. 2c). We also examined the presence of activated (cleaved) caspase-3, a hallmark of apoptotic cell death, at both 24 h and 7 d post-injury, but found very few positive cells in the injured frontal cortex (< 10/brain; data not shown), suggesting a predominance of necrotic cell death at these times.
Injury results in glial changes that persist into adulthood
Sham-operated brains contained widespread GFAP-positive astrocytes and low Iba-1 immuno-reactivity (Fig. 3a-h). At 24 h post-injury, GFAP reactivity was more intense in the peri-contusional area, and prominent cell processes were noted. By 7 d post-injury, staining was robustly elevated over sham levels, particularly in the peri-contusional parenchyma, and associated with a glial scar. GFAP-positive astrocytes persisted in the injured cortex until at least 3 months post-injury. In contrast to the delayed astrocytic response that appeared to peak at 7 d, activated microglia and macrophages showed a robust increase in Iba-1 reactivity by 24 h post-injury (Fig. 3i-p). Iba-1-positive cells were most prominent in the dorsal cortex, corpus callosum and striatum by 7 d post-injury, and intensely labeled Iba-1-positive cells were still evident at 3 months post-injury, although appeared to be fewer in number.
Traumatic axonal injury is a signature feature of the injured brain
Traumatic axonal injury is a distinct pathological consequence of TBI, which can be identified by the accumulation of β-APP in swollen axons [23]. There was no evidence of β-APP accumulation in sham animals (data not shown). At 24 h post-injury, abundant β-APP-positive cells and swollen axons were found in the peri-contusional dorsal cortex and corpus callosum (Fig. 4a-c). Filamentous staining with beaded appearance was evident in the ipsilateral corpus callosum beneath the lesion site, extending across the midline into the contralateral corpus callosum. At 7 d the intensity of β-APP staining was considerably reduced (Fig. 4d, e), and mostly granular or globular in appearance. Minimal, localized immuno-reactivity remained at 1 month post-injury, and no evidence of β-APP staining was found by 3 months (data not shown).
Volumetric reduction in the injured frontal lobe peaks at 1 month post injury
Cresyl violet staining of brains collected 1 and 3 months post-injury revealed the formation of a pronounced cortical cavity, ventricular enlargement and deformation of the ipsilateral corpus callosum (Fig. 5a-c). At 1 month post-injury, the ipsilateral dorsal cortex was significantly reduced compared to sham mice. In contrast, the contralateral cortex volume of sham and TBI mice was comparable (post-hoc, n.s.). Ipsilateral tissue loss was similar at 3 months, with a significant volume reduction in TBI mice compared to sham in the dorsal cortex. The volume of the remaining ipsilateral dorsal cortex was strikingly comparable in brain-injured mice at adolescence and adulthood (7.67 ± 0.47 mm3 at 1 m; 8.18 ± 0.49 mm3 at 3 m; t-test t18=0.7482, p=0.4640). No differences were found between cortical volumes in either hemisphere of sham-operated mice at 1 or 3 months after surgery.
Injury results in impairments in motor function at adulthood
The accelerating rotarod task was employed to evaluate motor function after frontal lobe injury (Fig. 6a). Overall, the latency to fall increased over three consecutive days with a significant effect of time at both adolescence (2-way RM ANOVA, F2,36=19.98, p<0.0001) and adulthood (F2,34=11.18, p=0.0002), indicating motor learning over time. At adolescence, TBI mice showed poorer performance across the testing period compared to sham (2-way RM ANOVA, effect of injury F1,36=20.77, p=0.0002). Post-hoc analyses found that sham and TBI mice performed similarly on day 1, suggesting a comparable initial ability. However, while sham mice showed an increased mean latency on days 2 and 3, TBI mice failed to show this improvement (post-hoc, p<0.001 and 0.05, on days 2 and 3, respectively). A similar pattern was evident in the adult cohort, which also showed a significant overall effect of injury (2-way RM ANOVA, F2,34=11.24, p=0.0275). Again, TBI mice showed the greatest impairment on day 2 (post-hoc, p<0.05) following comparable performance to sham animals at day 1, suggestive of a deficit in motor learning.
Reduced rearing behavior emerges as brain-injured mice reach adulthood
Rearing behavior was evaluated in the open field arena, as a measurement of forelimb motor function. At adolescence, sham and TBI mice spent an equivalent amount of time in an upright posture (t1,18=0.3942, p=0.6980; Fig. 6b), and reared a comparable number of times (t1,18=0.1678, p=0.8686, data not shown). In contrast, adult TBI mice showed a significant deficit in rearing behavior, with a reduction in both the time spent rearing (t1,17=3.560, p=0.0024) as well as the number of occurrences (t1,17=3.093, p=0.0066, data not shown). These findings indicate long-term motor impairment after frontal injury at a young age.
Assessments of anxiety in adolescent and adult mice after frontal TBI
The open field test, elevated plus and elevated zero mazes were used to assess anxiety levels. The distance travelled was comparable between sham and TBI mice in all three tasks (data not shown). In the plus and zero mazes, anxiolytic behavior (measured as the time spent in the open area) was comparable between sham and TBI mice at both adolescence and adulthood. In the open field task only, TBI mice showed an increase in anxiety at adulthood but not adolescence (Suppl. Fig. 1).
Frontal injury to the immature brain does not alter social investigation
Social investigation was first assessed by the partition test (Fig. 7a). There was no significant difference in the total investigative time spent at the partition between sham and TBI mice at either adolescence (t-test; t1,18=1.450, p=0.1644) or adulthood (t1,17=0.9280, p=0.3664). Similarly, in the complementary resident-intruder task (Fig. 7b), sham and TBI mice showed comparable interest in the stimulus mouse (no effect of injury, p=0.6934 at adolescence, p=0.1988 at adulthood). In addition, injury did not affect engagement in other investigative behaviors at adolescence, including grooming (t1,18=0.8884, p=0.3861), following (t1,18=1.018, p=0.3222), or circling behaviors (t1,18=1.5559, p=0.1364). At adulthood, TBI and sham mice also spent comparable time grooming (t1,17=0.5099, p=0.6167), following (t1,17=1.199, p =0.2471), and circling the stimulus mouse (t1,17=0.3784, p =0.7098). Overall, both sham and TBI test mice spent significantly more time sniffing the ano-genital region of the stimulus mouse compared to the head and torso (2-way ANOVA effect of region, F1,36=59.60, p<0.0001 at adolescence; F1,34=35.75, p<0.0001 at adulthood).
Injury does not alter social dominance, sociability or social recognition
The tube dominance task was used to determine social dominance between the test mouse and a novel stimulus mouse, hypothesizing that tendencies towards social dominance or aggression may be altered after injury. However, the likelihood of the test mouse winning its encounter was similar in both sham and TBI mice in the adolescent cohort (Fig. 7c, t1,18=0.3408, p=0.7372). Adult mice also exhibited a comparable chance to winning their encounters, regardless of injury (t1,17=0.4270, p=0.6747).
We next evaluated preferences for sociability and social novelty using the three-chamber task, as described previously (Fig. 7d) [18,20,24]. Adolescent mice showed a normal preference for sociability, as evident by significantly more time spent in the chamber containing stimulus mouse 1 compared to the empty chamber (2-way ANOVA effect of chamber, F1,36=50.81, p<0.0001). This was comparable in both sham and TBI mice (no effect of injury, F1,36=0.0306, p=0.8633). When tested during adulthood, there was also a strong differential response to the stimulus mouse (F1,34=274.6, p<0.0001), again, consistent regardless of injury (F1,34=0.3455, p=0.5606). In the subsequent test stage, which evaluates a preference for social novelty, adolescent mice tended to spent more time in the chamber containing the new stimulus mouse 2 compared to stimulus 1, however this effect did not reach significance (effect of chamber, F1,36=3.347, p=0.0756). When tested during adulthood, however, all mice showed a strong preference for social novelty (effect of chamber, F1,34=33.96, p<0.0001). There was no effect of injury at either adolescence (F1,36=0.007, p=0.9339) or adulthood (F1,34=0.008, p=0.9281).
Olfactory function is normal after injury to the frontal lobe
Since olfactory cues are essential for social behaviors in mice [21], and frontal lobe injury in rodents may cause damage to the adjacent olfactory bulbs, we assessed olfactory function using a buried food task. We found no significant difference in the latency to find a buried food source in TBI mice compared to sham at either adolescence (sham 55.8 ± 18.5 s, TBI 98.0 ± 30.8 s; t1,18=1.174, p=0.2555) or adulthood (sham 175.1 ± 36.6 s, TBI 195.9 ± 50.5 s; t1,17=0.3269, p=0.7477), indicating comparable olfactory function regardless of injury.
Brain-injured mice retain normal spatial learning and memory in the MWM
The MWM was used to assess cognitive function after frontal TBI. Firstly, the average velocity was quantified during sessions 1-4 as a measure of swimming speed and ability (Fig. 8a). At adolescence, while there was an overall increase in velocity (2-way RM ANOVA effect of time, F3,18=4.064, p=0.0112), TBI mice showed a lower velocity across the testing period (effect of injury, F1,18=4.554, p=0.0469). This was also evident in the adult cohort (effect of injury, F1,17=6.939, p=0.0174; effect of time, F3,17=12.020, p<0.0001), indicating that brain-injured mice show a swimming deficit in this task. As such differences may confound the latency to reach the platform, a commonly-used outcome measure, we instead examined the distance travelled by mice to reach the platform [25].
At adolescence, all mice showed a steep learning curve in sessions 1-4 (Fig. 8b), with a considerable reduction over time in the distance travelled to find the visible platform (2-way RM ANOVA effect of time, F3,18=19.92, p<0.0001). However, there was no overall difference in performance between sham and TBI mice (effect of injury, F1,18=0.019, p=0.8933). In the adult cohort, we expected to see a similar pattern of improvement in performance across visible sessions; this is indeed the case (2-way RM ANOVA effect of time, F3,17=12.50, p<0.0001), however, mice in session 1 showed an unusually short distance travelled, suggesting an artifact in the paradigm setup. Distinct from the adolescent cohort, at adulthood we saw an injury effect in this learning task (effect of injury, F1,17=10.62, p=0.0046), with TBI mice actually travelling a shorter distance to find the platform compared to sham mice in sessions 2 and 3 (post-hoc, p<0.01 and p<0.05, respectively).
The hidden platform sessions (6-10) challenge mice to locate a submerged platform using external spatial cues. All mice showed an improvement in this task over time in the adolescent (2-way RM ANOVA effect of time F5,18=9.873, p<0.0001) and adult cohorts (F5,17=4.729, p<0.0001). However, performance was similar between TBI and sham groups at both ages (effect of injury, F5,18=3.899, p=0.1935 at adolescence; F5,17=0.019, p=0.1468 at adulthood).
Probe trials provide a measure of memory retention by quantifying the time spent in the target quadrant (with the platform now removed) compared to the other quadrants. In the adolescent cohort, both sham and TBI mice spent equivalent time in all four quadrants during the first probe trial, with a preference for the target quadrant emerging by probe trial 2 (Suppl. Fig. 2). By probe trial 3 (Fig. 8c), both sham and TBI adolescent mice show a strong preference for the target quadrant compared to other quadrants (F3,36=6.776, p=0.0001 and F3,36=16.66, p<0.0001, respectively; post-hoc as annotated on graph). Interestingly, this preference was lost by probe trial 4 (one week later; Fig. 8d), suggesting that adolescent mice fail to retain this spatial memory long-term. In the adult cohort, all mice demonstrated improvements in this task between probe trials 1 and 2 (Suppl. Fig. 2). By probe trial 3 (Fig. 8c), both sham and TBI adult mice showed a strong preference for the target quadrant (F3,32=9.813, p<0.0001 for sham; F3,36=16.99, p<0.0001 for TBI). In contrast to the adolescence cohort, sham animals showed a similar preference for the target quadrant one week later in probe trial 4 (Fig. 8d, F3,32=8.056, p=0.0004), which was also comparable in TBI mice (F3,36=12.86, p<0.0001).
Age-dependent behavioral phenotypes in locomotor activity and social investigation
The aforementioned analyses were all performed comparing sham and TBI mice at each age separately, as per the study design to gauge the impact of brain injury within each cohort. During data analysis, however, it became apparent that age-dependent phenotypes existed, independent of injury. Thus we asked, by 2-way ANOVA’s with factors of age and injury, whether adolescent and adult mice exhibit different behavioral phenotypes. In the open field paradigm, we found a significant effect of age on the distance moved (F1,35 =29.67, p<0.0001), reflecting an increase in general locomotion by adult mice compared to adolescents (Suppl. Fig. 1a). In the elevated plus and zero mazes (Suppl. Fig. 1b), we also saw a greater distance traveled by adult mice compared to adolescent (F1,35 =179.9, p<0.0001 and F1,35 =29.03, p<0.0001, respectively). There was no effect of injury on distance moved in any of these tasks (p=0.1917, 0.239 and 0.3878, for open field, plus and zero mazes, respectively). We also saw that adult mice reared more often than adolescent mice in the open field (F1,36=72.16, p<0.0001), and spent more time upright (F1,36=146.6, p<0.0001; Fig. 5b). Thus, adult mice showed an overall higher level of activity and locomotion compared to adolescent mice.
In contrast, an age-dependent reduction in social behaviors was consistently detected with increasing age. Independent of injury or sham, the adult cohort showed reduced investigative time in the partition test (Fig. 6a; F1,35 =16.43, p=0.0003), as well as in the resident-intruder test (Fig. 6b; F1,36=19.74; p<0.0001) compared to adolescent mice. The tube-dominance task also revealed an unexpected effect of age, where adult mice had a lower chance of winning their encounter (Figure 6c; F1,35 =7.408, p=0.0101), compared to at adolescence. Together, these observations are consistent with previous observations that juvenile animals show high sociability.
Lastly, we unveiled an interesting age-dependent finding in the final probe trial of the MWM (Figure 7d). Independent of injury, adult mice showed a strong preference for the target quadrant compared to the opposite and adjacent quadrant, indicating long-term memory retention. In contrast, adolescent mice did not favor the target quadrant over any other at this time, suggesting that they were unable to retain spatial memory long-term.
DISCUSSION
This is the first comprehensive anatomical and behavioral assessment of traumatic injury to the developing frontal cortex. We describe patterns of cortical and subcortical cell loss and axonal degeneration, determine the extent to which injury at an early age influences long-term volumetric changes in the cortex, and profile specific changes in the behavioral repertoire that are unique to this model. Lastly, we identify age-dependent behavioral phenotypes that are independent of injury.
Injury to the frontal lobe: From early necrosis to long-term volumetric loss
This model produces acute intracranial bleeding and swelling of the impacted cortex, as well as robust cell death in the peri-contusional cortex and underlying subcortical structures, as indicated by abundant FJC and TUNEL staining at 24 h and 7 d post-injury. The accumulation of β-APP within peri-contusional and contralateral white matter tracts is consistent with traumatic axonal degeneration, another hallmark of brain injury [23]. A prominent glial response was also evident across the first week post-injury, with an earlier increase in Iba-1 immuno-reactivity compared to GFAP-positive astrocytes. By 1 and 3 months after frontal TBI, a pronounced cavity was observed in the ipsilateral dorsal cortex which merged with an enlarged lateral ventricle anteriorly. Interestingly, the extent of tissue loss by volumetric analysis was strikingly similar at both 1 and 3 months post-injury, suggesting that the lesion was stabilized by 1 month. This is in contrast to our previously characterized model of parietal lobe CCI in p21 mice, in which the cortical lesion expands in parallel with brain maturation from day 7 to 14 [26], and from adolescence to adulthood [16], suggestive of ongoing neurodegeneration over a longer time period.
Frontal contusions, encephalomalacia and thinning of the frontal cortices are particularly common after TBI in children [6,27,28]. Upon autopsy, axonal injury as evident by β-APP accumulation is characteristic of brain-injured infants and young children [23], consistent with evidence of wide-spread damage to white matter tracts detected by diffusion tensor imaging [27,29]. The clinical importance of such damage is emphasized by findings that extensive fronto-temporal atrophy 2-3 years after moderate-severe TBI in children is associated with poorer functional recovery [9]. Our new model, which features acute traumatic axonal damage and pronounced volumetric loss of the frontal lobe, thus replicates many of the pathological findings associated with TBI to the frontal lobes in children.
Persistent motor impairment after unilateral frontal TBI
Functional outcomes were assessed at adolescence and early adulthood, based upon previous studies in both rodents and monkeys demonstrating that significant impairments may not emerge until later in life [16,30,31]. Here we find cortical damage and overt tissue loss in the M1, M2 and supplementary motor cortex, regions which are essential for the planning, coordination and execution of movements [32]. Not surprisingly, the presence of distinct deficits in motor function/learning, evident as poor rotarod performance as well as a slower swimming speed and reduced rearing, was a salient functional outcome of this injury model. Importantly, these deficits persist into adulthood, suggesting that any compensatory mechanisms are inadequate in the developing brain to overcome region-specific cortical damage. Impairments in gait, reaching, and grasping movements, balance, fine motor skills and coordination are reported after brain injury in school-aged children [33-35] and adults [36-38]. However, there is still a scarcity of data regarding motor function in younger, toddler-aged children after TBI, and whether such functional impairments persist or improve over time. Our new model has great potential for the exploration of the underlying mechanisms and potential interventions for injury-dependent motor dysfunction. Future studies utilizing forelimb-specific tasks or detailed gait analyses may be useful to delineate laterality and fine motor components of these impairments, particularly in the context of testing novel therapeutics or interventions which may have a functional benefit in the injured developing brain.
Regional specificity of functional outcomes
In contrast to significant motor impairment, there was no evidence that injury to the frontal cortex altered anxiety levels, social behavior or spatial memory performance. Moreover, there was preservation of normal spatial learning and memory in the hippocampal-mediated MWM task at both adolescence and adulthood, consistent with a lack of pathology in the hippocampus. Such findings are in contrast to our previously characterized model of unilateral injury to the parietal cortex, in which social behaviors, spatial learning and memory and impaired but motor function is unaffected [15,16]. Comparison of these two models provides insight into the mechanisms and consequences of early-life TBI to different neuroanatomical regions (Table 1).
Table 1.
Pathology/behavior | Parietal injury | Frontal injury |
---|---|---|
Cell death and neuronal loss | + | + |
- frontal cortex | - | + |
- parietal cortex | + | - |
- hippocampus | + | - |
- dorsal striatum | - | + |
- dorsal thalamus | + | - |
- anterior corpus callosum | - | + |
- posterior corpus callosum | + | - |
Reactive gliosis | + | + |
Axonal injury | + | + |
Hyperactivity | + | - |
Memory deficits | + | - |
Social deficits | + | - |
Anxiety | +/- | - |
Motor deficits | - | + |
It is important to place our behavior findings in the broader context of other studies that have addressed controlled cortical impact to the developing rodent brain. Rats with injury to the unilateral parietal lobe at p7, p17 and p28 show spatial learning and memory deficits in the MWM [39-41], which persist up to 3 months [42] and coincide with transient sensorimotor symptoms. Injury to the unilateral somatosensory cortex in p17 rats results in deficits on the rotarod task which persisted to 2 months post-injury, as well as changes in anxiety which emerged at adulthood [43]. In contrast, the phenotype described herein, of pronounced and persistent motor deficits coexisting with normal cognitive function, is distinct from all existing rodent models of TBI at a young age. This model provides a unique opportunity to understand mechanisms underlying these deficits, as well as investigate functional recovery and potential compensation at both the brain and spinal cord level.
Does early frontal TBI affect anxiety at adulthood?
Exploratory and anxiety-related behaviors were assessed in mice after frontal TBI. Here we report a test-specific response, were adult TBI mice spent reduced time in the center of the open field compared to sham controls (suggestive of increased anxiety - Suppl. Fig. 1a), in contrast to no differences in the elevated plus and zero mazes. While such a battery of tests may provide a more comprehensive understanding the extent to which these tasks relate remains contentious [44,45]. Use of the open field paradigm as the sole measure of anxiety has been questioned, as performance in this task may be influenced by numerous factors including motor output, motivation, fear-related freezing, sickness and stress [44]. Given our findings, we conclude that frontal TBI at this injury magnitude does not overtly alter anxiety. Future studies may incorporate measures of autonomic nervous system function, such as changes in heart rate, to correlate with findings from behavioral measures of anxiety [46].
Normal psychosocial function after unilateral frontal TBI to the immature brain
Based upon the clinical literature indicating an adverse association between frontal lobe injury and psychosocial outcomes in brain-injured children [6], as well as our recent work identifying social deficits in adult mice after parietal lobe TBI at p21 [18], we hypothesized that unilateral frontal TBI at p21 would also result in notable social dysfunction. Contrary to expectations, however, brain-injured mice in this study were indistinguishable from sham controls in a battery of social behavior tests. One possible explanation for this finding is that the functional consequences of frontal injury are impacted by the age-at-insult. Developmental age is a strong predictor of outcome after early-life brain injury, as determined by both lesion experiments in rodents [47] and studies of young brain-injured patients [48,49]. It is widely accepted that the developing brain is less functionally-specific compared to the mature brain, such that the establishment of regional localization of function is not yet complete. As a result, injury to the immature brain may trigger a more generalized dysfunction; or, inversely, may allow for the adaption of new neuronal networks to compensate for damage [50]. Developmentally-regulated processes such as myelination and synaptic pruning are likely to contribute to and potentially modify injury mechanisms and functional consequences after TBI [51].
Evidence from other rodent studies supports this hypothesis of age-dependent vulnerability to frontal injury. Aspiration of the entire frontal lobe in rodents prior to p6 has been associated with poorer behavioral outcome compared to a similar injury during the second or third week of life, when significant recovery was observed despite pronounced tissue loss [47,52]. It is possible that, at p21, the frontal lobe shows robustness to focal injury compared to TBI at earlier or later ages, such that there is functional recovery or compensation in terms of psychosocial behaviors. Investigation of unilateral frontal TBI at a range of different developmental ages will thus help to further elucidate regional and age-dependent specificity of social behaviors.
Secondly, the lack of psychosocial dysfunction in this model may be a consequence of lesion laterality. Here, we establish a unilateral injury to allow for direct comparison to our well-characterized unilateral parietal lobe injury model, also performed at p21 [15,16] (Table 1). Specific lesions to the anterior cingulate cortex reduces social interactions and social memory in rodents [53], and frontal lesions that alter social behavior in patients tends to extend from the orbitofrontal cortex medially into the anterior cingulate cortex [54]. In our current unilateral injury model, medial neuroanatomical structures are somewhat spared primary injury which may explain preservation of social function in these mice. It is worth noting that the detailed assessment of social behaviors is not common after experimental TBI, such that the social consequences of bilateral frontal TBI to either the immature or adult brain are unknown.
Lastly, it is possible that functional consequences persist in this model of frontal TBI to the developing brain which have not yet been exposed. Problems with attention and orientation have been reported after bilateral frontal injury in adult rats [10], while a recent study demonstrated decision-making deficits using a new scent discrimination task which was specific to frontal injury [55]. Future studies are required to challenge young brain-injured mice with tasks that directly require frontal lobe input, to examine additional behaviors which are often impaired in young patients such as executive function, impulsivity, attention and inhibitory control [48,56,57].
Age-dependent behaviors
In line with several previous studies reporting the emergence of injury-induced impairments over the course of brain development [16,30,31], we saw an age-dependent emergence of rearing deficits, which were absent at adolescence but pronounced in adult brain-injured mice. We also uncovered a distinct effect of age on normal behavioral phenotypes, independent of injury. Adolescent mice demonstrated heightened social investigation compared to adult mice, consistent with adolescence being a time characterized by increased sociability [58,59]. This age-dependent behavior continues to decline with increasing age, as 30 month old rats reportedly spend approximately 75% less time interacting socially compared to young adults [60]. On the contrary, the distance traveled in the open field, plus and zero mazes showed an increase with age from adolescence to adulthood, suggestive of increasing exploratory behavior with maturation. Further, adolescent mice were unable to remember the location of the MWM platform during the final probe trial, suggesting that spatial memory retention is not fully developed at this age compared to in adult animals, consistent with a developmentally-regulated improvement in spatial memory as reported in rats [61] and children [62]. Together, these data highlight the importance of using age-matched control animals in experiments across developmental time. Further characterization of the emergence of age-dependent behaviors may improve our understanding of the functional consequences of injury at different ages.
CONCLUSIONS
Brain injury during early life disrupts brain development and results in regionally specific consequences that persist to adulthood. Injury to the frontal lobes is particularly common in young brain-injured patients and associated with adverse outcomes. We have here developed a new model of unilateral frontal TBI to the immature mouse brain. Based on consistent findings of region-specific cellular vulnerability, coupled with evidence of a clinically relevant motor impairment, this model provides a unique opportunity to explore a phenotype of injury-induced motor dysfunction which persists to adulthood in the absence of detectable psychosocial or cognitive deficits. This model has applications both in the investigation of underlying mechanisms of functional deficits, as well as the elucidation of age and region-specific consequences of TBI. The development of interventions which target these motor deficits either acutely or chronically after injury have clinical applicability to young brain-injured patients in whom sensorimotor dysfunction persists.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the use of the UCSF Neurobehavioral Core and would like to thank the manager of this core, Sandra Canchola, for her assistance.
FUNDING
Funding was provided by National Institutes of Health/NINDS grants R01 NS050159 and NS077767 (L.N-H.), a Sir Keith Murdoch Postdoctoral Fellowship from the American Australian Association (B.D.S.) and a CJ Martin Overseas Biomedical Postdoctoral Fellowship from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (B.D.S.).
References
- 1.Langlois JA. Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States: Assessing outcomes in children. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2000. http://www.cdc.gov/traumaticbraininjury/pdf/TBI_assessing.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Claus CP, Tsuru-Aoyagi K, Adwanikar H, Walker B, Manvelyan H, Whetstone W, Noble-Haeusslein LJ. Age is a determinant of leukocyte infiltration and loss of cortical volume after traumatic brain injury. Dev Neurosci. 2010;32:454–465. doi: 10.1159/000316805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Potts MB, Koh SE, Whetstone WD, Walker BA, Yoneyama T, Claus CP, Manvelyan HM, Noble-Haeusslein LJ. Traumatic injury to the immature brain: inflammation, oxidative injury, and iron-mediated damage as potential therapeutic targets. NeuroReport. 2006;3:143–153. doi: 10.1016/j.nurx.2006.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tsuru-Aoyagi K, Potts MB, Trivedi A, Pfankuch T, Raber J, Wendland M, Claus CP, Koh SE, Ferriero D, Noble-Haeusslein LJ. Glutathione peroxidase activity modulates recovery in the injured immature brain. Ann Neurol. 2009;65:540–549. doi: 10.1002/ana.21600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Anderson V, Godfrey C, Rosenfeld JV, Catroppa C. 10 years outcome from childhood traumatic brain injury. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2012;30:217–224. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2011.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Levin HS, Zhang L, Dennis M, Ewing-Cobbs L, Schachar R, Max J, Landis JA, Roberson G, Scheibel RS, Miller DL, Hunter JV. Psychosocial outcome of TBI in children with unilateral frontal lesions. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2004;10:305–316. doi: 10.1017/S1355617704102129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Anderson V, Jacobs R, Harvey AS. Prefrontal lesions and attentional skills in childhood. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2005;11:817–831. doi: 10.1017/s1355617705051052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Eslinger PJ, Biddle KR. Adolescent neuropsychological development after early right prefrontal cortex damage. Dev Neuropsychol. 2000;18:297–329. doi: 10.1207/S1532694203Eslinger. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wilde EA, Hunter JV, Newsome MR, Scheibel RS, Bigler ED, Johnson JL, Fearing MA, Cleavinger HB, Li X, Swank PR, Pedroza C, Roberson GS, Bachevalier J, Levin HS. Frontal and temporal morphometric findings on MRI in children after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2005;22:333–344. doi: 10.1089/neu.2005.22.333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lindner MD, Plone MA, Cain CK, Frydel B, Francis JM, Emerich DF, Sutton RL. Dissociable long-term cognitive deficits after frontal versus sensorimotor cortical contusions. J Neurotrauma. 1998;15:199–216. doi: 10.1089/neu.1998.15.199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hoane MR, Lasley LA, Akstulewicz SL. Middle age increases tissue vulnerability and impairs sensorimotor and cognitive recovery following traumatic brain injury in the rat. Behav Brain Res. 2004;153:189–197. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2003.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bravo TP, Matchett GA, Jadhav V, Martin RD, Jourdain A, Colohan A, Zhang JH, Tang J. Role of histamine in brain protection in surgical brain injury in mice. Brain Res. 2008;1205:100–107. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.01.102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jadhav V, Matchett G, Hsu FP, Zhang JH. Inhibition of Src tyrosine kinase and effect on outcomes in a new in vivo model of surgically induced brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2007;106:680–686. doi: 10.3171/jns.2007.106.4.680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kilbourne M, Kuehn R, Tosun C, Caridi J, Keledjian K, Bochicchio G, Scalea T, Gerzanich V, Simard JM. Novel model of frontal impact closed head injury in the rat. J Neurotrauma. 2009;26:2233–2243. doi: 10.1089/neu.2009.0968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tong W, Igarashi T, Ferriero DM, Noble LJ. Traumatic brain injury in the immature mouse brain: characterization of regional vulnerability. Exp Neurol. 2002;176:105–116. doi: 10.1006/exnr.2002.7941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pullela R, Raber J, Pfankuch T, Ferriero DM, Claus CP, Koh SE, Yamauchi T, Rola R, Fike JR, Noble-Haeusslein LJ. Traumatic injury to the immature brain results in progressive neuronal loss, hyperactivity and delayed cognitive impairments. Dev Neurosci. 2006;28:396–409. doi: 10.1159/000094166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Spencer CM, Alekseyenko O, Serysheva E, Yuva-Paylor LA, Paylor R. Altered anxiety-related and social behaviors in the Fmr1 knockout mouse model of fragile X syndrome. Genes Brain Behav. 2005;4:420–430. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2005.00123.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Semple BD, Canchola SA, Noble-Haeusslein LJ. Deficits in social behavior emerge during development after pediatric traumatic brain injury in mice. J Neurotrauma. 2012;29:2672–2683. doi: 10.1089/neu.2012.2595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Duvoisin RM, Villasana L, Davis MJ, Winder DG, Raber J. Opposing roles of mGluR8 in measures of anxiety involving non-social and social challenges. Behav Brain Res. 2011;221:50–54. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.02.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yang M, Silverman JL, Crawley JN. Automated three-chambered social approach task for mice. Curr Protoc Neurosci. 2011;Chapter 8(Unit 8 26) doi: 10.1002/0471142301.ns0826s56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ryan BC, Young NB, Moy SS, Crawley JN. Olfactory cues are sufficient to elicit social approach behaviors but not social transmission of food preference in C57BL/6J mice. Behav Brain Res. 2008;193:235–242. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yang M, Crawley JN. Simple behavioral assessment of mouse olfaction. Curr Protoc Neurosci. 2009;Chapter 8(Unit 8 24) doi: 10.1002/0471142301.ns0824s48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Johnson VE, Stewart W, Smith DH. Axonal pathology in traumatic brain injury. Exp Neurol. 2012;246:35–43. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2012.01.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Moy SS, Nadler JJ, Perez A, Barbaro RP, Johns JM, Magnuson TR, Piven J, Crawley JN. Sociability and preference for social novelty in five inbred strains: an approach to assess autistic-like behavior in mice. Genes Brain Behav. 2004;3:287–302. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-1848.2004.00076.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gerlai R. Behavioral tests of hippocampal function: simple paradigms, complex problems. Behav Brain Res. 2001;125:269–277. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00296-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yoneyama-Sarnecky T, Olivas AD, Azari S, Ferriero DM, Manvelyan HM, Noble-Haeusslein LJ. Heme oxygenase-2 modulates early pathogenesis after traumatic injury to the immature brain. Dev Neurosci. 2010;32:81–90. doi: 10.1159/000258700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Oni MB, Wilde EA, Bigler ED, McCauley SR, Wu TC, Yallampalli R, Chu Z, Li X, Hunter JV, Vasquez AC, Levin HS. Diffusion tensor imaging analysis of frontal lobes in pediatric traumatic brain injury. J Child Neurol. 2010;25:976–984. doi: 10.1177/0883073809356034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wilde EA, Merkley TL, Bigler ED, Max JE, Schmidt AT, Ayoub KW, McCauley SR, Hunter JV, Hanten G, Li X, Chu ZD, Levin HS. Longitudinal changes in cortical thickness in children after traumatic brain injury and their relation to behavioral regulation and emotional control. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2012;30:267–276. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2012.01.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wilde EA, Ayoub KW, Bigler ED, Chu ZD, Hunter JV, Wu TC, McCauley SR, Levin HS. Diffusion tensor imaging in moderate-to-severe pediatric traumatic brain injury: changes within an 18 month post-injury interval. Brain Imaging and Behavior. 2012 doi: 10.1007/s11682-012-9150-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kolb B, Whishaw IQ. Neonatal frontal lesions in hamsters impair species-typical behaviors and reduce brain weight and neocortical thickness. Behav Neurosci. 1985;99:691–706. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.99.4.691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Goldman PS. Functional recovery after lesions of the nervous systems. 3. Developmental processes in neural plasticity. Recovery of function after CNS lesions in infant monkeys. Neurosciences Research Program Bulletin. 1974;12:217–222. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lemon RN, Griffiths J. Comparing the function of the corticospinal system in different species: organizational differences for motor specialization? Muscle Nerve. 2005;32:261–279. doi: 10.1002/mus.20333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP, Hoppe B, Golge M, Dreesmann M, Damm-Stunitz U, Ritz A. Sensorimotor recovery in children after traumatic brain injury: analyses of gait, gross motor, and fine motor skills. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2003;45:821–828. doi: 10.1017/s001216220300152x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP, Stolze H, Golge M, Ritz A. Analyses of gait, reaching, and grasping in children after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:424–430. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2003.50017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Katz-Leurer M, Rotem H, Lewitus H, Keren O, Meyer S. Relationship between balance abilities and gait characteristics in children with post-traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2008;22:153–159. doi: 10.1080/02699050801895399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Basford JR, Chou LS, Kaufman KR, Brey RH, Walker A, Malec JF, Moessner AM, Brown AW. An assessment of gait and balance deficits after traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2003;84:343–349. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2003.50034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Williams G, Galna B, Morris ME, Olver J. Spatiotemporal deficits and kinematic classification of gait following a traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2010;25:366–374. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181cd3600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Walker WC, Pickett TC. Motor impairment after severe traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal multicenter study. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007;44:975–982. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2006.12.0158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Adelson PD, Fellows-Mayle W, Kochanek PM, Dixon CE. Morris water maze function and histologic characterization of two age-at-injury experimental models of controlled cortical impact in the immature rat. Childs Nerv Syst. 2013;29:43–53. doi: 10.1007/s00381-012-1932-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Adelson PD, Dixon CE, Robichaud P, Kochanek PM. Motor and cognitive functional deficits following diffuse traumatic brain injury in the immature rat. J Neurotrauma. 1997;14:99–108. doi: 10.1089/neu.1997.14.99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Prins ML, Hovda DA. Traumatic brain injury in the developing rat: effects of maturation on Morris water maze acquisition. J Neurotrauma. 1998;15:799–811. doi: 10.1089/neu.1998.15.799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Adelson PD, Dixon CE, Kochanek PM. Long-term dysfunction following diffuse traumatic brain injury in the immature rat. J Neurotrauma. 2000;17:273–282. doi: 10.1089/neu.2000.17.273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ajao DO, Pop V, Kamper JE, Adami A, Rudobeck E, Huang L, Vlkolinsky R, Hartman RE, Ashwal S, Obenaus A, Badaut J. Traumatic Brain Injury in Young Rats Leads to Progressive Behavioral Deficits Coincident with Altered Tissue Properties in Adulthood. Journal of Neurotrauma. 2012;29:2060–2074. doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.1883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.File SE. Factors controlling measures of anxiety and responses to novelty in the mouse. Behav Brain Res. 2001;125:151–157. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00292-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lalonde R, Strazielle C. Relations between open-field, elevated plus-maze, and emergence tests as displayed by C57/BL6J and BALB/c mice. J Neurosci Methods. 2008;171:48–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Depino AM, Gross C. Simultaneous assessment of autonomic function and anxiety-related behavior in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice. Behavioral Brain Research. 2007;177:254–260. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.11.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kolb B, Gibb R, Gorny G. Cortical plasticity and the development of behavior after early frontal cortical injury. Dev Neuropsychol. 2000;18:423–444. doi: 10.1207/S1532694208Kolb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Jacobs R, Harvey AS, Anderson V. Executive function following focal frontal lobe lesions: impact of timing of lesion on outcome. Cortex. 2007;43:792–805. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70507-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Karver CL, Wade SL, Cassedy A, Taylor HG, Stancin T, Yeates KO, Walz NC. Age at injury and long-term behavior problems after traumatic brain injury in young children. Rehabil Psychol. 2012;57:256–265. doi: 10.1037/a0029522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Spencer-Smith M, Anderson V. Healthy and abnormal development of the prefrontal cortex. Dev Neurorehabil. 2009;12:279–297. doi: 10.3109/17518420903090701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Semple BD, Blomgren K, Gimlin K, Ferriero DM, Noble-Haeusslein LJ. Brain development in rodents and humans: Identifying benchmarks of maturation and vulnerability to injury across species. Prog Neurobiol. 2013;106-107:1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kolb B, Holmes C, Whishaw IQ. Recovery from early cortical lesions in rats. III. Neonatal removal of posterior parietal cortex has greater behavioral and anatomical effects than similar removals in adulthood. Behav Brain Res. 1987;26:119–137. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(87)90161-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Rudebeck PH, Walton ME, Millette BH, Shirley E, Rushworth MF, Bannerman DM. Distinct contributions of frontal areas to emotion and social behaviour in the rat. Eur J Neurosci. 2007;26:2315–2326. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05844.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Rudebeck PH, Buckley MJ, Walton ME, Rushworth MF. A role for the macaque anterior cingulate gyrus in social valuation. Science. 2006;313:1310–1312. doi: 10.1126/science.1128197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Martens KM, Vonder Haar C, Hutsell BA, Hoane MR. A discrimination task used as a novel method of testing decision-making behavior following traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2012;29:2505–2512. doi: 10.1089/neu.2012.2388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Levin HS, Hanten G. Executive functions after traumatic brain injury in children. Pediatr Neurol. 2005;33:79–93. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2005.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Hu P, Fan J, Xu P, Zhou S, Zhang L, Tian Y, Wang K. Attention network impairments in patients with focal frontal or parietal lesions. Neurosci Lett. 2013;534:177–181. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.12.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Laviola G, Macri S, Morley-Fletcher S, Adriani W. Risk-taking behavior in adolescent mice: psychobiological determinants and early epigenetic influence. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2003;27:19–31. doi: 10.1016/s0149-7634(03)00006-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Spear L. Modeling adolescent development and alcohol use in animals. Alcohol Res Health. 2000;24:115–123. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Salchner P, Lubec G, Singewald N. Decreased social interaction in aged rats may not reflect changes in anxiety-related behaviour. Behav Brain Res. 2004;151:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2003.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Spreng M, Rossier J, Schenk F. Spaced training facilitates long-term retention of place navigation in adult but not in adolescent rats. Behav Brain Res. 2002;128:103–108. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00266-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Cestari V, Lucidi A, Pieroni L, Rossi-Arnaud C. Memory for object location: a span study in children. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2007;61:13–20. doi: 10.1037/cjep2007002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.