Abstract
Amyloid fibrils playing a critical role in disease expression, have recently been found to exhibit the excellent mechanical properties such as elastic modulus in the order of 10 GPa, which is comparable to that of other mechanical proteins such as microtubule, actin filament, and spider silk. These remarkable mechanical properties of amyloid fibrils are correlated with their functional role in disease expression. This suggests the importance in understanding how these excellent mechanical properties are originated through self-assembly process that may depend on the amino acid sequence. However, the sequence-structure-property relationship of amyloid fibrils has not been fully understood yet. In this work, we characterize the mechanical properties of human islet amyloid polypeptide (hIAPP) fibrils with respect to their molecular structures as well as their amino acid sequence by using all-atom explicit water molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. The simulation result suggests that the remarkable bending rigidity of amyloid fibrils can be achieved through a specific self-aggregation pattern such as antiparallel stacking of β strands (peptide chain). Moreover, we have shown that a single point mutation of hIAPP chain constituting a hIAPP fibril significantly affects the thermodynamic stability of hIAPP fibril formed by parallel stacking of peptide chain, and that a single point mutation results in a significant change in the bending rigidity of hIAPP fibrils formed by antiparallel stacking of β strands. This clearly elucidates the role of amino acid sequence on not only the equilibrium conformations of amyloid fibrils but also their mechanical properties. Our study sheds light on sequence-structure-property relationships of amyloid fibrils, which suggests that the mechanical properties of amyloid fibrils are encoded in their sequence-dependent molecular architecture.
Introduction
For last decades, it has been observed that denatured proteins are prone to form a self-assembled structure [1], particularly fibril structure referred to as “amyloid fibril” [2]–[4], which is ubiquitously found in patients suffering from various diseases ranging from neurodegenerative disease [5] to cardiovascular disease [6] and type II diabetes [7], [8]. For instance, islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP) chains are aggregated to form an one-dimensional fibril structure, and such IAPP fibril has been found in patients suffering from type II diabetes [7]. This amyloid fibril in human pancreas is able to replace the β cell performing the insulin secretion in pancreas, which results in amyloid fibril-driven inhibition of insulin secretion leading to diabetes. In particular, amyloid fibril is able to disrupt the cell membrane leading to cellular apoptosis, which is attributed to the bending rigidity of amyloid fibril being higher than that of cell membrane [9].
Recently, it has been suggested that the mechanical behavior of amyloid fibrils has played a vital role on their biological functions such as disease expression [10]. For example, a recent study [11] has reported that the infectivity of prion disease is closely related to the fracture toughness of prion fibrils, since a fragmented prion fibril serves as an amyloid seed that results in the infectivity of prion disease [12]. Moreover, we have recently found that the disease-specific prion fibril exhibits higher elastic modulus than prion fibril that does not have the disease specificity [13]. Moreover, the size-dependent elastic modulus of disease-specific prion fibril provides an insight into the length scale of prion fibril that can act as a seed leading to prion infectivity [13]. These observations clearly demonstrate that the functional role of amyloid fibril on the disease expression may be highly correlated with the mechanical properties of amyloid fibrils.
In order to understand the mechanical properties of amyloid fibrils, experimental techniques such as atomic force microscope (AFM) experiment and computational simulations such as atomistic simulations have been widely utilized. Specifically, a recent study by Knowles, et al. [14] reports that amyloid fibrils, which are formed by self-aggregation of mechanically weak proteins, bear excellent mechanical properties such as elastic modulus of ∼10 GPa, which is comparable to that of other mechanical proteins such as actin filament [15], microtubule [16]–[18], and spider silk [19]–[21]. In recent studies [22], [23], it has been found that the mechanical properties of β-lactoglobulin amyloid fibrils are closely related to their molecular structural hierarchies, particularly the helical pitch of amyloid fibrils, their length, and thickness. This indicates that the mechanical properties of amyloid fibrils in a physiological condition may be encoded in their molecular architecture. Based on a coarse-grained model, Knowles and coworkers [14] suggested that the remarkable mechanical properties of amyloid fibrils are attributed to intermolecular forces between cross-β structures (i.e. β sheet layers). In particular, the mechanical properties of protein materials are determined from the intermolecular interactions between the building blocks (e.g. β sheet layer) of protein materials [24], [25]. Moreover, Buehler and colleagues [26] have also provided that, by using atomistic simulation, the geometric confinement of hydrogen bonds between β sheet layers results in the enhancement of the mechanical properties of β sheet-rich crystal, which is responsible for the remarkable mechanical strength of a spider silk. This suggests that intermolecular interactions (e.g. hydrogen bonds) between β sheet layers play a role as a chemical glue in the mechanical behavior of β sheet-rich protein materials. Furthermore, a recent study [27] has interestingly found that the mechanical properties (e.g. persistent length) of amyloid fibrils are dependent on their β sheet-richness. In particular, when β strands are replaced with α helices in amyloid fibril, the mechanical properties (persistent length) of amyloid fibril are degraded. This may imply that the remarkable mechanical properties of amyloid fibril are due to intermolecular interactions between β sheet layers. These observations suggest that the mechanical properties of amyloid fibrils may be encoded in their molecular architecture, which sheds light on the structure-property relationship of amyloid fibril.
Even though there have been a lot of recent attempts to characterize the mechanical properties of amyloid fibrils as described earlier, structure-property relationship of amyloid fibrils has not been fully understood. Nevertheless, there are recent efforts [28]–[31] that have been made to gain insight into how the polymorphic structures of amyloid fibrils are formed in a physiological condition. A recent study by Sawaya, et al. [28] has reported that the polymorphic structures of amyloid fibrils are ascribed to the patterns of chemical interactions between β sheet layers; this chemical interaction pattern is named as “steric zipper” pattern. In recent studies, it has been found that the thermodynamic stability of amyloid fibrils is determined from their steric zipper patterns [31] as well as their amino acid sequence [29], [30]. This indicates that the molecular architecture of amyloid fibrils is encoded in not only their steric zipper patterns but also their amino acid sequence. Moreover, in our previous study [32], we have provided that the mechanical properties of amyloid fibrils are related to their steric zipper patterns such that antiparallel stacking of β strands improves the bending rigidity of amyloid fibril. In addition, a recent study by Buehler and coworkers [26] has suggested that the mechanical properties of β sheet-rich protein materials are determined from stacking pattern of β strands. These studies indicate that the mechanical properties of β sheet-rich protein materials are highly correlated with intermolecular interaction patterns between β sheet layers. In other words, it is implied that the mechanical properties of β sheet-rich protein materials are determined from their detailed molecular architecture, which sheds light on structure-property relationship of amyloid fibrils. However, the sequence-structure-property relationship of amyloid fibrils has still remained elusive despite recent efforts [26], [32] that partially reveal the structure-property relationship of β sheet-rich protein materials such as amyloid fibril [32].
The characterization of sequence-structure-property relationships of protein materials such as amyloid fibrils may be made possible due to computational simulation techniques such as molecular dynamics (MD) simulation [33]–[35] and coarse-grained (CG) simulation [36]–[38], which enable the detailed insight into the mechanical deformation behavior of protein materials. For example, CG models such as elastic network model (ENM) [39]–[43] have recently been utilized to characterize the mechanical properties of supramolecular structures such as cytoskeleton crosslinker such as α-actinin rod domain [44], microtubule [45], Aβ1–40 amyloid fibril [46], hIAPP amyloid fibril [32], prion amyloid fibril [13], and protein crystal [47]. However, CG model may be inappropriate in order to depict sequence-structure-property relationships of protein materials due to the inability of CG model to capture the atomistic details of the mechanical deformation of protein materials. On the other hand, MD simulations are able to probe the mechanical behaviors of protein materials at atomic scales and enable the fundamental understanding of a relationship between the mechanical properties of protein materials and their molecular architecture as well as amino acid sequence [48], [49]. For instance, researchers have successfully revealed structure-property relationships of various protein materials such as titin domain [24], β sheet crystal [26], spider silk [21], collagen fibril [50], and so forth by using MD simulations.
In this work, we study the mechanical properties of hIAPP amyloid fibrils with respect to their amino acid sequence and their molecular architecture (i.e. steric zipper patterns) by using all-atom explicit water MD simulation. We consider the eight possible steric zipper patterns of hIAPP fibrils. Here, the nomenclature of steric zipper patterns is provided in a previous study by Eisenberg and coworkers [28] (see also Table 1). Our consideration of different steric zipper patterns is due to recent finding [51], [52] of two different molecular structures of hIAPP20–29 fibrils, which are formed based on antiparallel or parallel stacking of β strands. We have found the dependence of the mechanical properties of hIAPP fibrils on their steric zipper patterns. Moreover, we take into account the effect of genetic mutation on not only the equilibrium conformations of amyloid fibrils but also their mechanical properties. In a recent study [53], it is found that rat islet amyloid polypeptide (rIAPP) fibril does not induce the expression of type II diabetes despite the similarity between amino acid sequences of hIAPP and rIAPP except a single amino acid difference. The details of amino acid sequence for both hIAPP and rIAPP are described in Supporting Information. It has not been fully understood how single amino acid sequence difference between hIAPP and rIAPP plays a role in the mechanical properties of IAPP fibrils related to their functional role in the expression of type II diabetes. A recent study by Middleton, et al. [54] reports that genetic mutation critically affects the molecular structure of amyloid fibril, which highlights sequence-structure relationship of amyloid fibrils. However, to our best knowledge, sequence-structure-property relationship of amyloid fibrils has not been fully understood. We believe that our study may provide the milestone for understanding the design principles of amyloid fibrils by revealing their sequence-structure-property relationship.
Table 1. Classifications of polymorphic structures for hIAPP amyloid fibrils.
Class | Abbreviation | Ladder alignment | Hydrogen bond type in ladder | Zipper type |
1 | co-pho | co-aligned | parallel | homo |
2 | co-phe | co-aligned | parallel | hetero |
3 | aa-pho | anti-aligned | parallel | homo |
4 | aa-phe | anti-aligned | parallel | hetero |
5 | co-apho | co-aligned | anti-parallel | homo |
6 | co-aphe | co-aligned | anti-parallel | hetero |
7 | aa-apho | anti-aligned | anti-parallel | homo |
8 | aa-aphe | anti-aligned | anti-parallel | hetero |
Methods
Equilibrium Dynamics Simulation
We carried out all-atom explicit water MD simulation in order to simulate the thermal fluctuation behavior of hIAPP fibril, whose structure is constructed based on the building block reported in protein data bank (pdb) with pdb code of 2KIB (for details, see Methods S1), by using NAMD package [55] along with CHARMM27 force field [56]. In particular, the equilibrium dynamics simulation of hIAPP fibril was conducted under explicit solvent condition using TIP3P water box. For the simulation of fluctuating fibril, we have performed energy minimization based on conjugate gradient method and, consequently, conducted equilibrium dynamics simulation based on NVT ensemble (for details, see Methods S1). The molecular structure of amyloid fibril was visualized by VMD software.
Analysis of Intermolecular Interactions in Amyloid Fibril
In order to understand the thermodynamic stability of amyloid fibril, we analyze the intermolecular interaction energies in amyloid fibrils based on molecular mechanics–Poisson-Boltzmann surface area (MM-PBSA) free energy calculations [57]. Specifically, molecular mechanics energy was computed using NAMD package (energy plugin) in VMD package. The nonpolar solvation energy (ΔGnp) is given by
(1) |
where SASA is solvent-accessible surface area that was calculated from VMD package with using a water probe of 1.4 Å, γ, and β are parameters given as γ = 0.00542 kcal/mol⋅ Å2 and β = 0.92 kcl/mol. The electrostatic solvation energy (ΔGPB) was estimated by solving the linear Poisson-Boltzmann equation using Delphi v.4 software, which accounts for electrostatic interaction between solute and polarizable solvent. In PBSA calculation, partial charges were modeled using OPLSAA force field. In this work, MM-PBSA calculations were based on MD trajectories that were saved every 125 ps from the last 5 ns period in MD simulation in order to exclude unequilibrated samplings.
Principal Component Analysis
To characterize the vibrational behavior of amyloid fibril, we employ the principal component analysis (PCA) that allows for measurement of the natural frequency of fluctuating protein structure [58]–[60]. The fluctuation matrix Q of amyloid fibril is defined as
(1) |
where r is the coordinates of Cα atoms constituting an amyloid fibril, an angle bracket indicates the ensemble average, and a symbol represents tensor product. Note that the fluctuation matrix Q is the 3N ×3N matrix, where N is the total number of Cα atoms. The stiffness matrix K of amyloid fibril can be obtained from statistical mechanics theory such as
(2) |
Here, ξj and v j represent the j-th eigenvalue and its corresponding normal mode vector, respectively, of fluctuation matrix Q, kB is the Boltzmann’s constant, and T is the absolute temperature. Here, the eigenvalues and their corresponding normal modes of fluctuation matrix Q were obtained using spectral decomposition based on component mode synthesis as described in our previous work [61]. Based on quasi-harmonic analysis, the natural frequency of amyloid fibril can be computed as follows.
(3) |
where ωj is the natural frequency of amyloid fibril at the j-th mode, and MC is the molecular weight of Cα atom. The details of the method are presented in Supporting Information. Here, PCA calculations were based on MD trajectories that were recorded at every 6 ps from the last 5 ns period in MD simulation in order to include only equilibrated samples.
Analysis on Thermal Fluctuation of Amyloid Fibril
To understand the thermal fluctuation behavior of an amyloid fibril, we consider the root-mean-square fluctuation (RMSF), bending angle, and dihedral angle, which are described in Methods S1.
In order to quantitatively depict the contribution of k-th normal mode to the thermal fluctuation of a fibril, we introduce a dimensionless parameter αk, which is defined as
(4) |
where RMSF is a root-mean-square fluctuation for vibrating amyloid fibril (see Methods S1), and RMSF(k) represents the contribution of k-th normal mode to the root-mean-square fluctuation. Here, RMSF is given by
(5) |
The contribution of k-th normal mode to the root-mean-square fluctuation is given as
(6) |
As a consequence, the dimensionless parameter αk is represented in the form
(7) |
For validating the thermodynamic stability of amyloid fibril, we take into account order parameter (OP) defined as [30]
(8) |
where n is the total number of β sheet layers constituting an amyloid fibril, and φj is the dihedral angle of the j-th β sheet layer. The structural stability of amyloid fibril is checked based on OP such that a fibril structure with its OP larger than 0.07 is regarded as an unstable and disordered structure [30].
Continuum Elastic Model
In order to relate the natural frequencies of amyloid fibril computed from atomistic simulations to the mechanical properties (e.g. bending rigidity, axial elastic modulus, and torsional shear modulus) of amyloid fibril, we consider a continuum elastic beam model, particularly the Euler-Bernoulli beam model [62], which is useful in describing the mechanical behavior of one-dimensional nanostructures [63]. The equation of motion for vibrating amyloid fibril modeled as an Euler-Bernoulli beam model is represented in the form of
(4.a) |
(4.b) |
(4.c) |
where EB, I, ρ, A, J, GT, and EX represent the bending elastic modulus, cross-sectional moment of inertia, mass density, cross-sectional area, cross-sectional polar moment of inertia, torsional shear modulus, and axial elastic modulus, respectively, of an amyloid fibril, w(x, t), φ(x, t), and u(x, t) indicate the transverse deflection, twist angle, and axial displacement, respectively, as a function of coordinate x (along the longitudinal direction of fibril) and time t. Note that the persistent length (lp) of amyloid fibril is given as lp = EBI/kBT, where kB and T are Boltzmann’s constant and absolute temperature, respectively. Based on Eq. (4), the natural frequencies of amyloid fibril are given by
(5.a) |
(5.b) |
(5.c) |
Eq. (5) clearly demonstrates that the elastic moduli of amyloid fibril can be obtained from its natural frequencies that can be computed from all-atom explicit water MD simulation.
Results
Equilibrium Conformation of Amyloid Fibril
In order to gain insight into the energetically favorable configurations of hIAPP amyloid fibrils among their eight possible steric zipper patterns, we consider the thermodynamic stability of hIAPP fibrils with their eight possible polymorphic structures. To check the thermodynamic stability, we performed equilibrium dynamics simulations of hIAPP fibrils (with their 8 polymorphic structures) for a period of 60 ns. Here, it should be noted that MD simulation with timescale of 60 ns may be sufficient to obtain the equilibrated molecular structures of amyloid fibrils. In previous studies [30], [31], [64], the simulation timescale of 20 ns was used to acquire the equilibrated molecular structures of amyloid fibrils. Figure 1a shows the conformations of polymorphic hIAPP fibrils at the time of 60 ns. As shown in Figure 1a , all polymorphic structures for hIAPP fibril seem to be thermodynamically stable. In order to quantitatively characterize the stability of such polymorphic structures, we take into account the RMSDs of polymorphic hIAPP fibrils. Figure 1b provides that after the time of ∼10 ns, the most of RMSDs reach a steady-state value, which indicates that polymorphic structures for hIAPP fibril may be thermodynamically stable after 10 ns. Remarkably, it is shown that the steady-state value of RMSD for anti-aligned parallel homo (aa-pho) structure is different from that of other polymorphic structures. This may imply that this structure exhibits the different equilibrium conformation from that of other polymorphic structures.
Moreover, we consider a twist angle (dihedral angel) between β sheet layers constituting a hIAPP fibril as a function of time ( Figure 1c ). It is found that after the time of ∼5 ns, the dihedral angles of polymorphic structures except aa-pho and co-apho2 structures approach to steady-state values, indicating that these polymorphic structures are energetically favorable. For aa-pho and co-apho2 structures, the dihedral angles reach steady-state values after time of 30 ns. This is consistent with our previous finding based on RMSDs as described above. It is interestingly found that aa-pho structure exhibits the equilibrium dihedral angle of ∼25°, whereas the equilibrium dihedral angle of other polymorphic structures is given by ≤15°. This clearly suggests that hIAPP fibrils can possess the two different equilibrium conformations based on steric zipper patterns. In particular, the equilibrium dihedral angle (i.e. ∼10°) of co-aphe, co-apho, and aa-aphe structures suggests that 72 β strands form a helical pitch of these fibril structures, which is consistent with the molecular structure of hIAPP fibril observed by solid-state NMR [51]. On the other hand, based on equilibrium dihedral angle, the helical pitch of aa-pho structure is formed by 28 β strands. Our finding suggests that the equilibrium structures of hIAPP fibrils are determined by their steric zipper patterns, that is, chemical interaction pattern between β sheet layers. In other words, the thermodynamically favorable structure of amyloid fibril is inherently encoded in the steric zipper patterns. Moreover, we investigate the OPs of all polymorphic structures in order to check the thermodynamic stability of such polymorphic structures. As shown in Figure 1d , it is found that the OPs of all polymorphic structures are estimated as ≤0.04, which suggests that all polymorphic hIAPP fibrils are thermodynamically stable. In addition, we scrutinize the bending angle of all polymorphic structures for hIAPP fibrils as a function of time, since the thermal fluctuation of a one-dimensional biological fiber such as amyloid fibrils is significantly attributed to the bending motion (see below). Figure 1e depicts that after ∼10 ns, the bending angles of all polymorphic amyloid fibrils fluctuate around the equilibrium value of ≤10° depending on the polymorphic structures.
For gaining insight into the thermodynamic stability of amyloid polymorphic structures, we take into account the MM-PBSA calculations. As shown in Table 2, the electrostatic solvation energy (ΔGPB) mostly contributes to solvation free energy in amyloid fibril. It is shown that the free energies of amyloid fibrils formed based on parallel stacking are higher than those of fibrils constructed based on antiparallel stacking, which suggests that anti-parallel stacking to form a fibril is thermodynamically favorable. This is consistent with finding that OPs of fibrils made based on parallel stacking are larger than those of fibrils formed based on antiparallel stacking. In particular, aa-pho structure exhibits the highest solvation free energy (−47273.6 kcal/mol) and highest OP (0.035) among all polymorphic structures. This suggests that the fibril formed based on anti-aligned parallel homo (aa-pho) structure is thermodynamically unstable when compared with other fibril structures.
Table 2. MM-PBSA free energy calculations.
Polymorphic structure | Molecular mechanics (MM) energy (kcal/mol) | Nonpolar solvation energy (kcal/mol) | Electrostatic solvation energy (kcal/mol) | Total energy (kcal/mol) |
co-pho | −3062.66±619.54 | −182.84±33.89 | −45230.2±63.39 | −48475.7 |
co-phe | −1709.18±684.00 | −184.47±35.06 | −45860.3±34.43 | −47754.0 |
aa-pho | −970.42±684.11 | −181.71±34.54 | −46121.5±60.56 | −47273.6 |
aa-phe | −2100.02±662.25 | −186.57±35.28 | −45150.3±5.17 | −47436.9 |
co-apho | −5021.42±655.05 | −188.28±34.35 | −44564.3±66.37 | −49774.0 |
co-aphe | −5338.77±687.69 | −185.47±35.11 | −44913.9±48.48 | −50438.1 |
aa-apho | −5376.54±682.24 | −185.65±35.44 | −44290.4±20.62 | −49852.6 |
aa-aphe | −5508.94±770.62 | −180.718±35.83 | −45048.5±16.79 | −50738.2 |
Vibrational Characteristics of Polymorphic hIAPP Fibrils
As elucidated in Section 2.1, the estimation of the vibrational characteristics of a material is a useful route to characterizing the mechanical properties (particularly, elastic moduli) of the material. For instance, in a recent study [65], the mechanical properties (e.g. persistent length) of microtubule have been measured using spectral decomposition method along with continuum elastic model. A previous study by Wang, et al. [66] has also utilized the spectral decomposition theory with wormlike chain (WLC) model in order to characterize the mechanical properties of hemoglobin fiber. This spectral decomposition theory with WLC model has recently been extended for studying the mechanical properties (e.g. persistent length) of amyloid fibrils based on their structures acquired from cryo-electron microscopy [67]. Moreover, a recent study by Zewail and coworkers [9] reports the elastic moduli of Aβ amyloid fibrils based on measurement of their vibrational properties using 4D electron microscopy. These previous studies [9], [65]–[67] suggest that characterization of the vibrational properties of biological materials allows for extracting their mechanical properties.
In order to verify the ability of continuum elastic model (i.e. Euler-Bernoulli beam model) to dictate the vibrational behavior of amyloid fibrils, we consider the deformation modes of hIAPP fibrils obtained from all-atom explicit water MD simulation. It is shown that the vibrational modes of hIAPP fibrils are able to depict bending modes, stretching mode, and torsional mode, respectively (see Figure S1). Here, we found two bending modes for hIAPP fibril, which are attributed to anisotropic cross-sectional moments of inertia for hIAPP fibril. In particular, there are two principal cross-sectional moments of inertia for hIAPP fibril. These two bending modes are well fitted to the mode shape of Euler-Bernoulli beam model given as φn(x) = An[(coshβnx+cosβnx) – σn(sinhβnx+sinβnx)] (for details, see refs. [32], [68]), which suggests that the vibrational characteristics of hIAPP fibril obtained from all-atom explicit water MD simulation are well dictated by a continuum elastic beam model.
Figure 2a shows the mode indices of all polymorphic hIAPP fibrils for their specific deformation modes such as bending, stretching, and torsional modes. Here, it should be noted that first six zero modes correspond to the rigid body motions of hIAPP fibrils. It is found that two bending deformation modes for all polymorphic hIAPP fibrils correspond to low-frequency normal modes (i.e. 7th∼10th normal mode) regardless of the steric zipper patterns of hIAPP fibrils. On the other hand, other deformation modes such as stretching and torsional modes for hIAPP fibrils are high-frequency normal modes. This indicates that the thermal fluctuation behavior of polymorphic hIAPP fibrils is attributed to their bending motion, since low-frequency motion determines the thermal fluctuation behavior of proteins (for more details, see below and Figure 2c ). This is consistent with theoretical model, e.g. WLC model [69], which delineates that the deformation behavior of biological fibers such as DNA [70]–[72], protein [73], [74], and microtubule [16] can be described by their bending motion rather than any other deformation modes such as stretching and torsion. Moreover, we found that the high-frequency deformation modes (i.e. stretching and torsional modes) are dependent on the steric zipper patterns of hIAPP fibrils. This indicates that the torsional and stretching deformations of amyloid fibril are attributed to its high-frequency mode that depends on the steric zipper pattern, whereas the bending motion of amyloid fibril is due to its low-frequency mode independent of chemical interaction patterns between β sheet layers. Figure 2b provides the natural frequencies of hIAPP fibrils corresponding to their deformation modes such as bending, stretching, and torsional modes, respectively. It is shown that the natural frequencies of hIAPP fibrils for their soft bending mode are estimated in a range of 0.1 THz to 0.2 THz, and that the natural frequencies for soft bending mode are highly dependent on the steric zipper pattern of hIAPP fibrils. It is shown that hIAPP fibrils formed by antiparallel stacking of β strands exhibit the natural frequency of ∼0.2 THz, which is larger than that (i.e. ∼0.1 THz) of fibrils formed by parallel stacking of β strands, for soft bending mode. This implies that antiparallel stacking of β strands enhances the bending rigidity of amyloid fibril, since the natural frequency is linearly proportional to the square root of elastic modulus. This provides that the steric zipper pattern is a key design parameter that determines the mechanical properties of amyloid fibrils.
In order to gain more insight into a relationship between the deformation modes and the thermal fluctuation behavior of hIAPP fibrils, we introduce the dimensionless parameter αk, which measures the contribution of k-th normal mode to the thermal fluctuation of amyloid fibril. As shown in Figure 2c , it is found that the contribution of soft bending mode to the thermal fluctuation of hIAPP fibrils is estimated in a range of 20% to 60% depending on their steric zipper patterns. This clearly elucidates the role of the steric zipper pattern on the thermal fluctuation behavior of amyloid fibrils. In a similar manner, the contribution of stiff bending mode to the thermal fluctuation of hIAPP fibrils is measured in a range between 15% and 45% depending on the steric zipper pattern. It is found that two bending modes contribute to more than 60% of thermal fluctuation for hIAPP fibrils, which is consistent with previous findings [41], [75], [76] that low-frequency motion determines the thermal fluctuation behavior of protein molecule. On the other hand, it is remarkably shown that the contribution of torsional mode and stretching mode to the thermal fluctuation of hIAPP fibrils is estimated as ∼15% and ∼10%, respectively, regardless of the steric zipper pattern of hIAPP fibril. This suggests that the contribution of high-frequency motion to the thermal fluctuation behavior of amyloid fibrils is almost independent of their steric zipper pattern, which is a key design parameter that determines the vibrational (mechanical) behavior of amyloid fibrils.
Polymorphism-Dependent Mechanical Properties
Based on continuum mechanics theory that relates the natural frequency of amyloid fibrils obtained from all-atom explicit water MD simulation to their mechanical properties, we measure the mechanical properties (i.e. bending rigidity, axial elastic modulus, and torsional shear modulus) of hIAPP fibrils as a function of their steric zipper patterns ( Figure 3 ). The elastic moduli of amyloid fibrils corresponding to their bending modes are estimated in a range of ∼1 GPa to ∼10 GPa depending on the steric zipper patterns of hIAPP fibrils. These bending elastic moduli are comparable to those of Aβ1–40 amyloid fibrils measured by AFM imaging-based experiment [14] and normal mode analysis (NMA) based on coarse-grained model [46]. Here, it should be noted that the bending elastic modulus of hIAPP fibril, whose length is ∼12 nm in this work, is much less than that of hIAPP fibrils, whose length is >50 nm considered in our previous work [32]. This is ascribed to the shear effect that plays a critical role on the bending deformation of short amyloid fibrils. The torsional shear moduli of hIAPP fibrils are measured in a range of ∼0.1 to ∼0.3 GPa, which is smaller than the shear modulus of Aβ1–40 amyloid fibril computed from coarse-grained model [46]. The axial elastic moduli of hIAPP fibrils are evaluated as ∼0.4 to ∼0.7 GPa, which is one order of magnitude smaller than the elastic modulus of Aβ1–40 amyloid fibril measured from MD simulation [77]. More remarkably, as shown in Figure 3 , the steric zipper pattern is a key design parameter that controls the mechanical properties of amyloid fibrils. Specifically, the bending elastic moduli of hIAPP fibrils are highly dependent on their steric zipper pattern such that the soft bending rigidities of hIAPP fibrils formed by parallel stacking of β strands are measured as ∼10–28 N⋅m2, while hIAPP fibrils made based on antiparallel stacking of β strands exhibit soft bending rigidity of ∼2×10–28 N⋅m2 ( Figure 3a ). This indicates that the optimal bending rigidity of amyloid fibrils can be achieved through antiparallel stacking of β strands. This finding is consistent with previous studies [26], [32] reporting that antiparallel stacking of β strands to construct β sheet-rich protein materials enhances their bending rigidity, which is attributed to the effect of geometric confinement of chemical bonds (e.g. hydrogen bonds) between β strands on the mechanical properties of β sheet-rich protein materials. However, the torsional shear moduli of hIAPP fibrils are not significantly dependent on the steric zipper patterns. This suggests that antiparallel stacking of β strands is only effective to increase the bending rigidity of amyloid fibrils but is ineffective to maximize their torsional rigidity. This implies that structure-property relationships of amyloid fibrils are governed by the deformation mode (i.e. loading mode).
In order to fully understand the role of the steric zipper pattern on the mechanical properties of hIAPP fibrils, we measure the hydrogen (H) bond per donor (residue) for all polymorphic structures as a function of time (Figure S2). Our consideration of H-bond per residue is attributed to recent finding [24], [25], [78] that the mechanical strength of a protein molecule is determined from H-bonds and their configuration. It is shown that the magnitude of fluctuation for H-bond per residue is much smaller than the ensemble average of H-bond per donor, which implies that during the thermal fluctuation of polymorphic hIAPP fibrils, the significant rupture or formation of H-bonds is not likely to occur; in general, the rupture of H-bonds critically affects the mechanical response (e.g. stiffness) of a protein molecule [24]. It is shown that the ensemble average of H-bond per residue for co-apho2 structure is measured as ∼0.4, which is larger than that (i.e. ∼0.25) of co-pho structure. This suggests that antiparallel stacking allows amyloid fibril to exhibit the optimal density of H-bonds between β strands. Moreover, based on the H-bond networks of all polymorphic structures (i.e. 8 steric zipper patterns) as shown in Figure S4, it is found that the directions of all H-bonds for polymorphic amyloid fibrils are parallel to the fibril axis, which suggests that the dependence of the mechanical properties of amyloid fibrils on their polymorphic structures is attributed to the density of H-bonds rather than the configuration of H-bond network. In addition, we have also shown that the H-bonds of amyloid fibril are likely to be conserved during the thermal fluctuation (Figure S6). This suggests that the steric zipper patterns determines the density of H-bonds between β strands, and consequently, the mechanical behavior of amyloid fibrils.
Effect of Genetic Mutation on the Equilibrium Conformation of hIAPP Fibrils
We study the effect of single point mutation of hIAPP20–29 constituting a hIAPP fibril on its molecular structure, since rat islet amyloid polypeptide (rIAPP) fibril does not induce any type II diabetes in a rat despite similarity between amino acid sequences of hIAPP20–29 and rIAPP [53]. In particular, the sequence of hIAPP20–29 is given as “SNNFGAILS”, while the amino acid sequence of rIAPP is suggested as “SNNLGAILS”. In a recent decade, a rIAPP chain was regarded as an inhibitor [53], which inhibits the formation of hIAPP fibrils. However, a recent study [54] reports that rIAPP can be also reacted with hIAPP chains to form an amyloid fibril, while the reaction rate between rIAPP and hIAPP chains is slower than that between hIAPP chains. In other words, rIAPP chain is also able to form an amyloid fibril but the aggregation process to form a fibril is very slow. Moreover, it is shown that an amyloid fibril synthesized with rIAPP chains exhibits a different molecular structure from that of fibril made of hIAPP chains [54]. This observation has led us to study the equilibrium conformations of both hIAPP and rIAPP fibrils, which can provide an insight into the effect of genetic mutation on the molecular structure of amyloid fibril.
Figure 4a illustrates the conformations of polymorphic rIAPP fibrils that were obtained from all-atom explicit water MD simulation at time of 60 ns. It is shown that co-phe and aa-pho structures for mutated fibril might be thermodynamically unstable, since the rIAPP chains at the end of these fibrils are severely distorted ( Figure 4a ), which may be a signature of unstable structure. It is also found that these two polymorphic structures exhibit the distorted neutral axis, indicating that these two polymorphic structures are not straightly formed along the fibril axis. This also suggests that these two polymorphic structures are thermodynamically unfavorable. Figure 4b depicts the RMSDs of polymorphic rIAPP fibrils as a function of time. It is found that for co-phe and aa-pho structures, the mutation increases RMSDs by the amount of ∼2 Å, even though RMSDs approach to a steady-state value after 30 ns. This suggests that RMSD alone is not sufficient to verify the thermodynamic stability of amyloid fibrils. As shown in Figure 4c , it is remarkably found that the dihedral angles of these two polymorphic structures are increasing with time even up to 30°, which indicates the instability of these polymorphic structures. Here, it should be noted that the maximum dihedral angle of wild type fibril is less than 30°. It is shown that the equilibrium dihedral angle of these polymorphic mutated fibrils (except co-phe and aa-pho structures) is slightly different from ∼10° that is the equilibrium dihedral angle of wild type (WT) fibrils (i.e. hIAPP fibrils). This implies that a single point mutation of hIAPP20–29 affects the equilibrium conformations of amyloid fibrils, which sheds light on sequence-structure relationship of amyloid fibrils. Furthermore, we investigate the OPs of polymorphic mutated fibrils. It is shown in Figure 4d that for co-phe structure, the single point mutation significantly increases OP from ∼0.15 to ∼0.6. For aa-pho structure, the mutation increases OP from ∼0.35 to ∼0.4, which is much larger than ∼0.07, an indicative of thermodynamic instability [30]. In addition, the genetic mutation increases the OP of co-pho structures by the amount of ∼0.2. This suggests that the genetic mutations increases the instability of co-pho, co-phe, and aa-pho fibril structures.
Effect of Genetic Mutation on the Mechanical Properties of Polymorphic Fibrils
Since the genetic mutation critically affects the equilibrium structures of IAPP fibrils, we study the mechanical properties of mutated fibrils for gaining insight into the role of genetic mutation on the mechanical properties of amyloid fibrils. Figure 5a shows the bending rigidities of both WT and mutated fibrils with respect to their steric zipper patterns. It is shown that a single point mutation does not significantly affect the soft bending rigidities of amyloid fibrils formed by parallel stacking of β strands, whereas the soft bending rigidities of co-apho, co-aphe, and aa-aphe fibril structures formed by antiparallel stacking of β strands are critically reduced by a single point mutation. This suggests that the alteration of the bending rigidity of amyloid fibrils due to genetic mutation is dependent on their steric zipper patterns. In other words, the mutation-driven change of amyloid mechanics may be inherently encoded in the molecular architecture (i.e. steric zipper pattern) of amyloid fibril. In addition, the F2L mutation critically decreases the stiff bending rigidities of co-apho, co-aphe, and co-apho2 fibril structures. Except aa-pho and aa-aphe structures, the genetic mutation significantly decreases the stiff bending rigidities of fibrils. Here, for aa-pho and aa-aphe structures, the mutation slightly increases the stiff bending rigidities of fibrils. This suggests that genetic mutation mostly degrades the bending rigidity of amyloid fibril. It is found that the genetic mutation decreases the torsional shear moduli of fibrils except aa-pho, aa-phe, co-apho2, and aa-aphe structures ( Figure 5c ). It is shown in Figure 5d that the genetic mutation reduces the axial elastic moduli of IAPP fibrils regardless of their steric zipper patterns. This suggests that the genetic mutation is a useful route to degrading the axial elastic properties of amyloid fibrils. In summary, the genetic mutation affects the mechanical properties of amyloid fibrils depending on their steric zipper patterns. Specifically, the alteration of bending and torsional elastic properties of amyloid fibrils due to genetic mutation depends on their steric zipper patterns, while the genetic mutation reduces the axial elastic moduli of amyloid fibrils regardless of their steric zipper patterns.
In order to understand the effect of mutation on the mechanical properties of amyloid fibrils, we investigate chemical interaction between β sheet layers constituting an amyloid fibril. First, we scrutinized the role of genetic mutation on H-bond per residue as a function of time, since H-bond interaction between β sheet layers is a key design parameter that determines the mechanical behavior of a protein molecule as described above. It is found that the genetic mutation does not significantly alter the H-bond per residue for polymorphic hIAPP fibrils regardless of their steric zipper patterns (Figure S3). In particular, as shown in Figure S5, the F2L mutation does not critically change the number of H-bonds and H-bond network. Moreover, during the thermal fluctuation, the H-bond network is conserved (Figure S7). This suggests that H-bond is not a key factor that governs the mutation-driven change of the mechanical behavior of amyloid fibrils. On the other hand, as shown in Figure 5e , the genetic mutation results in significant alteration of aromatic interactions between β sheet layers constituting a hIAPP fibril. In particular, the aromatic rings of a side chain for β sheet layer are present in WT amyloid fibrils, while the genetic mutation eliminates aromatic interactions between β sheet layers. This indicates that aromatic interaction depending on the amino acid sequence of fibril is a key factor that determines the mechanical properties of hIAPP fibrils. In other words, sequence-dependent side chain interaction plays a role in both the equilibrium conformations of polymorphic hIAPP fibrils and their mechanical properties. Our finding is qualitatively consistent with recent studies [79]–[81] reporting that the equilibrium conformations of hIAPP fibrils are significantly dependent on aromatic interactions between β sheet layers. In summary, the F2L mutation reduces the mechanical properties of hIAPP amyloid fibril, which is attributed to the mutation-driven elimination of aromatic interaction. It should be noted that the genetic mutation does not always decrease the mechanical properties of amyloid fibrils. For instance, genetic mutation leading to formation of salt bridge can result in increasing the elastic moduli of amyloid fibrils [82]. Specifically, an Aβ amyloid fibril without salt bridges twists dramatically, whereas that with salt bridges is mechanically rigid. This suggests that genetic mutation is a useful route in tuning the mechanical properties of amyloid fibril. Our study highlights sequence-structure-property relationship of amyloid fibrils, which may provide key design principles showing that the properties of amyloid fibrils can be tuned based on sequence-structure-property relationships necessary for enabling the development of not only molecular therapeutics but also biomimetic materials.
Discussion
In this work, we have studied the mechanical properties of amyloid fibrils using all-atom explicit water MD simulation along with continuum mechanics theory. Our study shows that the mechanical properties of amyloid fibrils are closely related to their molecular architectures, particularly the steric zipper patterns, and that the structure-dependent mechanical properties of amyloid fibrils are critically affected by genetic mutation. Specifically, amino acid sequence determines chemical interaction between β sheet layers constituting an amyloid fibril, and consequently, its mechanical properties. Our study sheds light on sequence-structure-property relationship of amyloid fibril, which highlights the design principles that provide an insight into how to tune the mechanical properties of an amyloid fibril based on its molecular structure and sequence.
In order to further understand the thermal fluctuation behavior of amyloid fibrils, which can be observed by AFM experiment, e.g. see refs. [14], [22], it is essential to study the mechanical (e.g. fluctuation) behavior of amyloid fibrils in the physiological condition. In our all-atom MD simulation, we excluded the effect of pH, ion, and temperature on the mechanical behavior of amyloid fibrils. It should be noted that physiological conditions (e.g. pH, ion concentration, temperature, etc.) may play a key role in not only the equilibrium conformations of amyloid fibrils but also their mechanical properties. In particular, in our recent study [83], it is found that a chemical condition (e.g. pH) of a solvent determines electrostatic interaction between amyloidogenic core and amyloid oligomer, which leads to the dependence of the equilibrium structures of amyloid fibrils on a physiological condition such as pH. Moreover, in a recent study [5], it has been reported that the metal ion is a key factor that affects an aggregation mechanism to form an Aβ amyloid fibrils as well as their neurotoxicity. In particular, the high concentration of Al3+ ions has been observed in patients who suffer from Alzheimer’s diseases [84], [85], even though the role of Al3+ ion on pathogenesis is still controversial [86]. Moreover, it has recently been provided that Cu2+ ions makes the polymorphic Cu2+ complexes with Aβ amyloids, which is attributed to the fact that there are several possible binding sites for Cu2+ ions in the Aβ amyloid fibrils [87]. These observations indicate the role of metal ions on the polymorphic structures of amyloid fibrils as well as their mechanical properties in a physiological condition. In summary, the effect of physiological condition on the mechanical properties of amyloid fibrils has not been thoroughly studied yet; it is necessary to understand the mechanical behavior of pathological amyloids in a physiological condition, which can provide an insight into how to effectively treat the pathological amyloids for future therapeutics by chemically changing the mechanical properties of an amyloid fibril. The role of physiological condition on the polymorphic structures of amyloid fibrils and their mechanical behaviors will be taken into account for our future study.
In conclusion, we provide sequence-structure-property relationships of amyloid fibrils, which allow us to understand how the mechanical properties of amyloid fibrils are encoded in their molecular structures and their amino acid sequences. Specifically, as suggested in our work, the bending rigidity of an amyloid fibril can be tuned by changing the molecular structure (i.e. steric zipper pattern); the remarkable bending rigidity of amyloid fibril can be achieved through antiparallel β strands that maximize the density of H-bond per residue, which is a key factor determining the mechanical properties of a protein molecule. Moreover, our simulation results show that genetic mutation critically affects the equilibrium conformations of polymorphic amyloid fibrils and their mechanical properties. This sheds light on the role of amino acid sequence on the molecular structure of amyloid fibrils and their mechanical properties. Our study unveils the design principle of amyloid fibril, which shows that chemical interaction between β strands depending on the amino acid sequence of amyloid fibril governs the mechanical properties of amyloid fibril.
Supporting Information
Funding Statement
K.E. appreciates the financial support from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) under Grant No. 2012R1A1A2008616 and NRF-2010-0026223. S.N. gratefully acknowledges the financial support from NRF under Grant No. 2011-0007272, 2011-0029477, and 2012-0000785. G.Y. and S.N. are grateful to Korea University Grant for the financial support. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Chiti F, Dobson CM (2006) Protein Misfolding, Functional Amyloid, and Human Disease. Annu Rev Biochem 75: 333–366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Pepys MB (2006) Amyloidosis. Annu Rev Med 57: 223–241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Rochet J-C, Lansbury Jr PT (2000) Amyloid fibrillogenesis: themes and variations. Curr Opin Struct Biol 10: 60–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Merlini G, Bellotti V (2003) Molecular Mechanisms of Amyloidosis. N Eng J Med 349: 583–596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Miller Y, Ma B, Nussinov R (2010) Polymorphism in Alzheimer Aβ Amyloid Organization Reflects Conformational Selection in a Rugged Energy Landscape. Chem Rev 110: 4820–4838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Rapezzi C, Quarta CC, Riva L, Longhi S, Gallelli I, et al. (2010) Transthyretin-related amyloidoses and the heart: a clinical overview. Nat Rev Cardiol 7: 398–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Hoppener JWM, Ahren B, Lips CJM (2000) Islet Amyloid and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. N Eng J Med 343: 411–419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Clark A, Moffitt J (2007) Pancreatic Islet Amyloid and Diabetes. In: Uversky VN, Fink A, editors. Protein Misfolding, Aggregation, and Conformational Diseases. New York: Springer.
- 9. Fitzpatrick AWP, Park ST, Zewail AH (2013) Exceptional rigidity and biomechanics of amyloid revealed by 4D electron microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110: 10976–10981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Knowles TPJ, Buehler MJ (2011) Nanomechanics of functional and pathological amyloid materials. Nat Nanotechnol 6: 469–479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Tanaka M, Collins SR, Toyama BH, Weissman JS (2006) The physical basis of how prion conformations determine strain phenotypes. Nature 442: 585–589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Colby DW, Prusiner SB (2011) De novo generation of prion strains. Nat Rev Microbiol 9: 771–777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Yoon G, Kim YK, Eom K, Na S (2013) Relationship between disease-specific structures of amyloid fibrils and their mechanical properties. Appl Phys Lett 102: 011914. [Google Scholar]
- 14. Knowles TP, Fitzpatrick AW, Meehan S, Mott HR, Vendruscolo M, et al. (2007) Role of Intermolecular Forces in Defining Material Properties of Protein Nanofibrils. Science 318: 1900–1903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Classens MMAE, Bathe M, Frey E, Bausch AR (2006) Actin-binding proteins sensitively mediate F-actin bundle stiffness. Nat Mater 5: 748–753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Pampaloni F, Lattanzi G, Jonas A, Surrey T, Frey E, et al. (2006) Thermal fluctuations of grafted microtubules provide evidence of a length-dependent persistence length. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 10248–10253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Wells DB, Aksimentiev A (2010) Mechanical Properties of a Complete Microtubule Revealed through Molecular Dynamics Simulation. Biophys J 99: 629–637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Liu X, Zhou Y, Gao H, Wang J (2012) Anomalous Flexural Behaviors of Microtubules. Biophys J 102: 1793–1803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Gosline J, Guerette P, Ortlepp C, Savage K (1999) The mechanical design of spider silks: from fibroin sequence to mechanical function. J Exp Biol 202: 3295–3303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Termonia Y (1994) Molecular Modeling of Spider Silk Elasticity. Macromolecules 27: 7378–7381. [Google Scholar]
- 21. Giesa T, Arslan M, Pugno NM, Buehler MJ (2011) Nanoconfinement of Spider Silk Fibrils Begets Superior Strength, Extensibility, and Toughness. Nano Lett 11: 5038–5046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Adamcik J, Jung J-M, Flakowski J, De Los Rios P, Dietler G, et al. (2010) Understanding amyloid aggregation by statistical analysis of atomic force microscopy images. Nat Nanotechnol 5: 423–428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Lara C, Usov I, Adamcik J, Mezzenga R (2011) Sub-Persistence-Length Complex Scaling Behavior in Lysozyme Amyloid Fibrils. Phys Rev Lett 107: 238101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Eom K, Li PC, Makarov DE, Rodin GJ (2003) Relationship between the Mechanical Properties and Topology of Cross-Linked Polymer Molecules: Parallel Strands Maximize the Strength of Model Polymers and Protein Domains. J Phys Chem B 107: 8730–8733. [Google Scholar]
- 25. Ackbarow T, Chen X, Keten S, Buehler MJ (2007) Hierarchies, multiple energy barriers, and robustness govern the fracture mechanics of α-helical and β-sheet protein domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 16410–16415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Keten S, Xu Z, Ihle B, Buehler MJ (2010) Nanoconfinement controls stiffness, strength and mechanical toughness of β-sheet crystals in silk. Nat Mater 9: 359–367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. vandenAkker CC, Engel MFM, Velikov KP, Bonn M, Koenderink GH (2011) Morphology and Persistence Length of Amyloid Fibrils Are Correlated to Peptide Molecular Structure. J Am Chem Soc 133: 18030–18033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Sawaya MR, Sambashivan S, Nelson R, Ivanova MI, Sievers SA, et al. (2007) Atomic structures of amyloid cross-β spines reveal varied steric zippers. Nature 447: 453–457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Berryman JT, Radford SE, Harris SA (2009) Thermodynamic Description of Polymorphism in Q- and N-Rich Peptide Aggregates Revealed by Atomistic Simulation. Biophys J 97: 1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Berryman JT, Radford SE, Harris SA (2011) Systematic Examination of Polymorphism in Amyloid Fibrils by Molecular-Dynamics Simulation. Biophys J 100: 2234–2242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Park J, Kahng B, Hwang W (2009) Thermodynamic Selection of Steric Zipper Patterns in the Amyloid Cross-β Spine. PLoS Comput Biol 5: e1000492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Yoon G, Kwak J, Kim JI, Na S, Eom K (2011) Mechanical Characterization of Amyloid Fibrils Using Coarse-Grained Normal Mode Analysis. Adv Funct Mater 21: 3454–3463. [Google Scholar]
- 33. Karplus M, Petsko GA (1990) Molecular dynamics simulations in biology. Nature 347: 631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Karplus M, McCammon JA (2002) Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules. Nat Struct Mol Biol 9: 646–652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Sotomayor M, Schulten K (2007) Single-Molecule Experiments in Vitro and in Silico. Science 316: 1144–1148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Voth GA (2009) Coarse-Graining of Condensed Phase and Biomolecular Systems: CRC Press.
- 37. Tozzini V (2005) Coarse-grained models for proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 15: 144–150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Sherwood P, Brooks BR, Sansom MSP (2008) Multiscale methods for macromolecular simulations. Curr Opin Struct Biol 18: 630–640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Tirion MM (1996) Large amplitude elastic motions in proteins from a single-parameter, atomic analysis. Phys Rev Lett 77: 1905–1908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Atilgan AR, Durell SR, Jernigan RL, Demirel MC, Keskin O, et al. (2001) Anisotropy of fluctuation dynamics of proteins with an elastic network model. Biophys J 80: 505–515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Eom K, Yoon G, Kim J-I, Na S (2010) Coarse-Grained Elastic Models of Protein Structures for Understanding Their Mechanics and Dynamics. J Comput Theor Nanosci 7: 1210–1226. [Google Scholar]
- 42. Eom K, Baek S-C, Ahn J-H, Na S (2007) Coarse-graining of protein structures for normal mode studies. J Comput Chem 28: 1400–1410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Jang H, Na S, Eom K (2009) Multiscale network model for large protein dynamics. J Chem Phys 131: 245106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Golji J, Collins R, Mofrad MRK (2009) Molecular Mechanics of the α-Actinin Rod Domain: Bending, Torsional, and Extensional Behavior. PLoS Comput Biol 5: e1000389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Deriu MA, Soncini M, Orsi M, Patel M, Essex JW, et al. (2010) Anisotropic Elastic Network Modeling of Entire Microtubule. Biophys J 99: 2190–2199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Xu ZP, Paparcone R, Buehler MJ (2010) Alzheimer’s Aβ(1–40) Amyloid Fibrils Feature Size-Dependent Mechanical Properties. Biophys J 98: 2053–2062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Yoon G, Park H-J, Na S, Eom K (2009) Mesoscopic model for mechanical characterization of biological protein materials. J Comput Chem 30: 873–880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Buehler MJ, Keten S, Ackbarow T (2008) Theoretical and computational hierarchical nanomechanics of protein materials: Deformation and fracture. Prog Mater Sci 53: 1101–1241. [Google Scholar]
- 49. Buehler MJ, Keten S (2010) Colloquium: Failure of molecules, bones, and the Earth itself. Rev Mod Phys 82: 1459–1487. [Google Scholar]
- 50. Buehler MJ (2006) Nature designs tough collagen: Explaining the nanostructure of collagen fibrils. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 12285–12290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Nielsen JT, Bjerring M, Jeppesen MD, Pedersen RO, Pedersen JM, et al. (2009) Unique identification of supramolecular structures in amyloid fibrils by solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Angew Chem Int Ed 48: 2118–2121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Madine J, Jack E, Stockley PG, Radford SE, Serpell LC, et al. (2008) Structural Insights into the Polymorphism of Amyloid-Like Fibrils Formed by Region 20–29 of Amylin Revealed by Solid-State NMR and X-ray Fiber Diffraction. J Am Chem Soc 130: 14990–15001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Hollander PA, Levy P, Fineman MS, Maggs DG, Shen LZ, et al. (2003) Pramlintide as an adjunct to insulin therapy improves long-term glycemic and weight control in patients with type 2 diabetes: a 1-year randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 26: 784–790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Middleton CT, Marek P, Cao P, Chiu C-c, Singh S, et al. (2012) Two-dimensional infrared spectroscopy reveals the complex behaviour of an amyloid fibril inhibitor. Nat Chem 4: 355–360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Phillips JC, Braun R, Wang W, Gumbart J, Tajkhorshid E, et al. (2005) Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem 26: 1781–1802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. MacKerell AD, Banavali N, Foloppe N (2000) Development and current status of the CHARMM force field for nucleic acids. Biopolymers 56: 257–265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Liu F-F, Liu Z, Bai S, Dong X-Y, Sun Y (2012) Exploring the inter-molecular interactions in amyloid-β protofibril with molecular dynamics simulations and molecular mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann surface area free energy calculations. J Chem Phys 136: 145101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Amadei A, Linssen ABM, Berendsen HJC (1993) Essential Dynamics of Proteins. Proteins: Struct Funct Genet 17: 412–425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Kitao A, Go N (1999) Investigating protein dynamics in collective coordinate space. Curr Opin Struct Biol 9: 164–169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Hayward S, Go N (1995) Collective Variable Description of Native Protein Dynamics. Annu Rev Phys Chem 46: 223–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Kim J-I, Na S, Eom K (2009) Large Protein Dynamics Described by Hierarchical Component Mode Synthesis. J Chem Theor Comput 5: 1931–1939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Landau LD, Lifshitz EM (1986) Theory of Elasticity. St. Louis: Butterworth-Heinemann.
- 63. Eom K, Park HS, Yoon DS, Kwon T (2011) Nanomechanical Resonators and Their Applications in Biological/Chemical Detection: Nanomechanics Principles. Phys Rep 503: 115–163. [Google Scholar]
- 64. Ndlovu H, Ashcroft AE, Radford SE, Harris SA (2012) Effect of Sequence Variation on the Mechanical Response of Amyloid Fibrils Probed by Steered Molecular Dynamics Simulation. Biophys J 102: 587–596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Valdman D, Atzberger PJ, Yu D, Kuei S, Valentine MT (2012) Spectral Analysis Methods for the Robust Measurement of the Flexural Rigidity of Biopolymers. Biophys J 102: 1144–1153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Wang JC, Turner MS, Agarwal G, Kwong S, Josephs R, et al. (2002) Micromechanics of isolated sickle cell hemoglobin fibers: bending moduli and persistence lengths. J Mol Biol 315: 601–612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Sachse C, Grigorieff N, Fändrich M (2010) Nanoscale Flexibility Parameters of Alzheimer Amyloid Fibrils Determined by Electron Cryo-Microscopy. Angew Chem Int Ed 49: 1321–1323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Meirovitch L (1967) Analytical methods in vibrations. New York: Macmillan.
- 69. Kumar S, Li MS (2010) Biomolecules under mechanical force. Phys Rep 486: 1–74. [Google Scholar]
- 70. Bustamante C, Marko JF, Siggia ED, Smith S (1994) Entropic elasticity of λ-phage DNA. Science 265: 1599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Wiggins PA, van der Heijden T, Moreno-Herrero F, Spakowitz A, Phillips R, et al. (2006) High flexibility of DNA on short length scales probed by atomic force microscopy. Nat Nanotechnol 1: 137–141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Wilhelm J, Frey E (1996) Radial Distribution Function of Semiflexible Polymers. Phys Rev Lett 77: 2581–2584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Rief M, Fernandez JM, Gaub HE (1998) Elastically Coupled Two-Level Systems as a Model for Biopolymer Extensibility. Phys Rev Lett 81: 4764. [Google Scholar]
- 74. Staple DB, Payne SH, Reddin ALC, Kreuzer HJ (2008) Model for Stretching and Unfolding the Giant Multidomain Muscle Protein Using Single-Molecule Force Spectroscopy. Phys Rev Lett 101: 248301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Cui Q, Bahar I (2005) Normal Mode Analysis: Theory and Applications to Biological and Chemical Systems: CRC Press.
- 76. Bahar I, Lezon TR, Bakan A, Shrivastava IH (2010) Normal Mode Analysis of Biomolecular Structures: Functional Mechanisms of Membrane Proteins. Chem Rev 110: 1463–1497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Paparcone R, Keten S, Buehler MJ (2010) Atomistic simulation of nanomechanical properties of Alzheimer’s Aβ(1–40) amyloid fibrils under compressive and tensile loading. J Biomech 43: 1196–1201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Eom K, Makarov DE, Rodin GJ (2005) Theoretical studies of the kinetics of mechanical unfolding of cross-linked polymer chains and their implications for single-molecule pulling experiments. Phys Rev E 71: 021904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Tracz SM, Abedini A, Driscoll M, Raleigh DP (2004) Role of Aromatic Interactions in Amyloid Formation by Peptides Derived from Human Amylin. Biochemistry 43: 15901–15908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Marek P, Abedini A, Song B, Kanungo M, Johnson ME, et al. (2007) Aromatic Interactions Are Not Required for Amyloid Fibril Formation by Islet Amyloid Polypeptide but Do Influence the Rate of Fibril Formation and Fibril Morphology. Biochemistry 46: 3255–3261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Marshall KE, Morris KL, Charlton D, O’Reilly N, Lewis L, et al. (2011) Hydrophobic, Aromatic, and Electrostatic Interactions Play a Central Role in Amyloid Fibril Formation and Stability. Biochemistry 50: 2061–2071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Paparcone R, Pires MA, Buehler MJ (2010) Mutations Alter the Geometry and Mechanical Properties of Alzheimer’s Aβ(1–40) Amyloid Fibrils. Biochemistry 49: 8967–8977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Lee G, Lee W, Lee H, Lee SW, Yoon DS, et al. (2012) Mapping the surface charge distribution of amyloid fibril. Appl Phys Lett 101: 043703. [Google Scholar]
- 84. Kawahara M, Kato M, Kuroda Y (2001) Effects of aluminum on the neurotoxicity of primary cultured neurons and on the aggregation of β-amyloid protein. Brain Research Bulletin 55: 211–217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Drago D, Folin M, Baiguera S, Tognon G, Ricchelli F, et al. (2007) Comparative effects of Aβ(1–42) complex: from rat and human amyloid on rat endothelial cell culture. J Alzheimers Dis 11: 33–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Zatta P (2003) Metal Ions and Neurodegenerative Disorders. Sinapore: World Scientific.
- 87. Parthasarathy S, Long F, Miller Y, Xiao Y, McElheny D, et al. (2011) Molecular-Level Examination of Cu2+ Binding Structure for Amyloid Fibrils of 40-Residue Alzheimer’s beta by Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 133: 3390–3400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.