Abstract
It has been shown previously that high rates of methicillin- and mupirocin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus exist in the Caribbean islands of Trinidad and Tobago, as well as a high prevalence of Panton-Valentine leukocidin-positive S. aureus. Beyond these studies, limited typing data have been published. In order to obtain insight into the population structure not only of MRSA but also of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus, 294 clinical isolates collected in 2012/2013 were typed by microarray hybridisation. A total of 15.31% of the tested isolates were MRSA and 50.00% were PVL-positive. The most common MSSA strains were PVL-positive CC8-MSSA (20.41% of all isolates tested), PVL-positive CC152-MSSA (9.52%) and PVL-positive CC30-MSSA (8.84%) while the most common MRSA were ST239-MRSA-III&SCCmer (9.18%) and ST8-MRSA-IV, “USA300” (5.78%). 2.38% of characterised isolates belonged to distinct strains likely to be related to “Staphylococcus argenteus” lineages. The population structure of S. aureus isolates suggests an importation of strains from Africa, endemicity of PVL-positive MSSA (mainly CC8) and of ST239-MRSA-III, and a recent emergence of the PVL-positive CC8-MRSA-IV strain “USA300”.
Introduction
In Trinidad and Tobago, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) poses a public health risk [1], [2], [3], [4]. MRSA prevalence is high and there is no strict isolation of patients with suspected MRSA-infection, as practised in hospitals elsewhere. A limited number of studies have been conducted on S. aureus for which the main focus has generally been MRSA. Swanston [5] performed a study in the Port of Spain General Hospital between June 1995 and May 1996 where the prevalence of MRSA was found to be 4.6%. Akpaka et al. [2] conducted a study of 1912 S. aureus isolates collected from major hospitals in the country between 2000 and 2001 and found that 12.8% of the isolates were methicillin-/oxacillin-resistant. In another study by Orrett [4] isolates were collected from various hospital and communal facilities in Trinidad between January 1, 1999 and December 31, 2004. It was found that the prevalence of MRSA from surgical/burn wounds, urine and pus/abscess were 60.1%, 15.5% and 6.6%, respectively. The major sources of MSSA were surgical/burn wounds, pus/abscess samples and upper respiratory tract specimens with rates of 32.9%, 17.1% and 14.3%, respectively. The vast majority of MRSA isolates from Trinidad and Tobago belong to the hospital-associated strain ST239-MRSA-III. Other strains were rare although the emerging “community-acquired” MRSA (CA-MRSA) strain “USA300” (ST8-MRSA-IV [PVL+/ACME+]) was also found [3]. Of special interest with regard to infection control is a high rate of mupirocin resistance among MRSA isolates [3], [6].
Another issue is the frequent carriage of Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes, lukF-PV and lukS-PV, in S. aureus isolates from Trinidad and Tobago. Following a case of a child who died hours after admission despite being managed in the best intensive care unit of the country [7], further studies [8] revealed a high prevalence of PVL genes in isolates from skin and soft tissue infections, as well as a high proportion of PVL-positive, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) belonging to clonal complex (CC) 8.
In order to obtain an overview not only on MRSA but also on MSSA, clinical isolates from Trinidad and Tobago were collected in 2012/2013 and characterised by microarray hybridisation and, partially, by multi locus sequence typing (MLST).
Materials and Methods
Study sites
There are five main regional hospitals in Trinidad and Tobago, namely, Port of Spain General Hospital, Eric Williams Medical Sciences Complex (EWMSC), San Fernando General Hospital (SFGH), Sangre Grande Hospital and Scarborough General Hospital (SGH). Additionally, there are nine district health facilities and 97 health centres throughout the country besides several privately run hospitals. For the purpose of this study, isolates were collected at three major hospitals. Two of them (EWMSC and SFGH) are located on the island of Trinidad, while the third one (SGH) is situated on Tobago.
The population served by EWMSC is about 600,000 and 19,029 admissions were recorded for the year 2011. Approximately 450 S. aureus strains were isolated, 20% of which were MRSA. The population served by the SFGH is also about 600,000. For 2011, there were 52,137 admissions. Over 700 S. aureus strains were isolated, 35% of which were MRSA.
SGH is Tobago's major health facility, being the only hospital located on the island during the period of the study. Supplemented by 18 health centres it serves a population of 55,000. During the study period, the hospital was still located on Fort Street. SGH was then a 100 bed facility that provided a variety of critical facilities such as Accident and Emergency, Medical and Surgical procedures. It has since been relocated to Signal Hill where a state of the art health care facility has been constructed.
Isolates and origin
S. aureus isolates for this study were recovered from routine clinical samples processed at the hospitals. The isolates were included in the study after being initially identified at the medical microbiological laboratories of the participating hospitals. Prior to shipping the isolates to Dresden, further tests were carried out at the laboratory of the Department of Para-Clinical Sciences to confirm the species of the isolates and determine their antibiotic susceptibilities. Standard laboratory methods (including the automated Microscan walkaway 96 system (Siemens, USA)) were used to identify these bacterial isolates according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines.
Microarray procedures
The Alere StaphyType DNA microarray (Alere Technologies GmbH, Jena, Germany) was used for the characterisation of the isolates. The array allows the detection of 333 genes including species markers, typing markers, resistance genes and exotoxins encoding sequences as well as an assignment to clonal complexes and strains. The protocols and procedures were described in detail in previous work [9], [10].
In short, bacteria were grown on Columbia blood agar and incubated overnight at 37°C. The harvested staphylococci were suspended to enzymatic lysis by lysostaphin, lysozyme and RNAse A and digested using Proteinase K. Then, the extracted DNA was purified using an automated system (EZ1, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).
The purified DNA was used as template for an iterated linear primer elongation using one primer per target. During linear amplification, all targets were labelled by internal incorporation of biotin-16-dUTP. Labelled and amplified single-stranded DNA was hybridised to the array, followed by washing and blocking. Horseradish-peroxidase-streptavidin was added which bound to biotin-labelled DNA. Positive reactions were visualised by the local precipitation of a dye by the peroxidase. An image of the microarray was taken and automatically analysed using dedicated reader and software (ArrayMate and Iconoclust, Alere Technologies).
MLST
Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was performed by amplification and sequencing of housekeeping genes arcC, aroE, glpF, gmk, pta, tpi, and yqiL using primers and reaction conditions that have been described previously [11]. However, alternative primers were used for the aroE gene in order to better fit a formerly published sequence (GenBank FR821777) of “Staphylococcus argenteus”-like strains [12]. These primer sequences were aro_fw_agt: GTCCAATTGAGCATTCTTTATCA and aro_rv_agt: CATACCTGCCGGAGTAGT. Resulting sequences were analysed using the software tools on the MLST website (http://saureus.mlst.net/).
Tree reconstruction
In order to visualise similarities (although not necessarily true phylogenetic relationships) between the hybridisation profiles, a network tree (Figure 1) was constructed using SplitsTree software [13]. Array hybridisation profiles of the tested isolates (see File S1) were converted into a series of ‘sequences’. Each position in this ‘sequence’, i.e., each target gene or allele, could have a value of ‘positive’ (‘C’), ‘negative’ (‘G’) or ‘ambiguous’ (‘A’). These ‘sequences’ were used with SplitsTree version 4.11.3 on default settings (characters transformation: uncorrected P/ignore ambiguous states, distance transformation: Neighbour-Net, and variance: ordinary least squares).
Figure 1. SplitsTree graph visualising strain assignments and similarities between isolates.
Isolates were numbered as in file S1. mecA positives are indicated with squares, PVL-positives with crosses.
Results
294 clinical isolates collected in 2012/2013 were typed by microarray hybridisation. Demographic data as well as full array hybridisation profiles are provided as File S1.
Resistance markers
An overview on abundances of resistance genes is given in Table 1.
Table 1. Genes associated with antimicrobial resistance.
| Gene | Gene product/explanation | All isolates | MSSA only | MRSA only |
| mecA | Alternate penicillin binding protein 2, defining MRSA | 45 (15.31%) | 0 | 45 (100%) |
| SCCmec I | Cassette chromosome elements SCCmec | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| SCCmec II | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| SCCmec III | 25 (8.5%) | 0 | 25 (55.56%) | |
| SCCmec III+ccrA/B-4 | 2 (0.68%) | 0 | 2 (4.44%) | |
| SCCmec IV | 15 (5.10%) | 0 | 15 (33.33%) | |
| SCCmec IV (trunc.) | 2 (0.68%) | 0 | 2 (4.44%) | |
| SCCmec V | 1 (0.34%) | 0 | 1 (2.22%) | |
| merA/B | Mercury resistance operon | 31 (10.54%) | 4 (1.61%) | 27 (60%) |
| blaZ/I/R | Beta-lactamase operon | 254 (86.39%) | 211 (84.74%) | 43 (95.56%) |
| erm (A) | Methyltransferases, erythromycin/clindamycin resistance | 29 (9.86%) | 2 (0.80%) | 27 (60%) |
| erm (B) | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| erm (C) | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| lnu (A) | Lincosamid-nucleotidyltransferase | 1 (0.34%) | 1 (0.4%) | 0 |
| mef (A) | Macrolide efflux protein A | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| mph (C) | Probable lysylphosphatidylglycerol synthetase | 21 (7.14%) | 4 (1.61%) | 17 (37.78%) |
| msr (A) | Energy dependent efflux of erythromycin | 24 (8.16%) | 7 (2.81%) | 17 (37.78%) |
| aacA-aphD | Bifunctional enzyme Aac/Aph, gentamicin resistance | 28 (9.52%) | 0 | 28 (62.22%) |
| aadD | Aminoglycoside adenyltransferase, tobramycin resistance | 12 (4.08%) | 7 (2.81%) | 5 (11.11%) |
| aphA3 | Aminoglycoside phosphotransferase, neo-/kanamycin resist. | 45 (15.31%) | 2 (0.80%) | 43 (95.56%) |
| fusB | Fusidic acid resistance gene ( = far1) | 1 (0.34%) | 1 (0.4%) | 0 |
| fusC | Fusidic acid resistance gene from “SCCfus” elements | 2 (0.68%) | 2 (0.8%) | 0 |
| mupA | Mupirocin resistance protein | 17 (5.78%) | 9 (3.61%) | 8 (17.78%) |
| tet (K) | Tetracycline resistance | 29 (9.86%) | 6 (2.41%) | 23 (51.11%) |
| tet (M) | Tetracycline resistance | 30 (10.20%) | 3 (1.20%) | 27 (60%) |
| cat | Chloramphenicol acetyltransferase | 2 (0.68%) | 1 (0.40%) | 1 (2.22%) |
| fexA | Chloramphenicol/florfenicol exporter | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| cfr | Linezolid resistance | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| dfrS1 | Dihydrofolate reductase type 1 | 1 (0.34%) | 1 (0.4%) | 0 |
| qacA | Quaternary ammonium compound resistance protein A | 22 (7.48%) | 3 (1.2%) | 19 (42.22%) |
| qacC | Quaternary ammonium compound resistance protein C | 9 (3.06%) | 6 (2.41%) | 3 (6.67%) |
| sat | Streptothricine-acetyltransferase | 45 (15.31%) | 2 (0.80%) | 43 (95.56%) |
| vanA | Vancomycin resistance gene | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A total of 15.31% of the tested isolates proved to be mecA-positive. The occurrence of mecA across the different lineages is shown in Figure 1. SCCmec III was the most common type of SCCmec element, found in 27 isolates (all belonging to ST239). All these isolates were also positive for merA/B, indicating the presence of a composite SCCmec III/SCCmer element as previously described [14]. Two of these isolates harboured additional ccrA/B-4 genes. SCCmec IV was detected in 15 isolates that were assigned to the “USA300” strain. Two additional isolates were identical except for a lack of ccr genes. SCCmec V was found only once in a CC5 strain.
Other common resistance markers were the beta-lactamase operon (blaZ/I/R; in 86.39% of isolates), erm(A) (in 9.86%, mostly ST239-MRSA-III), msr(A)/mph(C) (in 8.16% and 7.14%, respectively; mostly associated with “USA300”) and aphA3/sat (in 15.31%, largely associated with ST239-MRSA-III and “USA300”). The gentamicin/tobramycin resistance gene aacA-aphD occurred in 9.52% of isolates that all belonged to ST239-MRSA-III or “USA300”. A gene associated with mupirocin resistance, mupA, was detected in 5.78% of isolates. Among MSSA, the rate of mupA-positives was 3.61% (9 out of 249 isolates), while for MRSA it was 17.78% (8 out of 45). Other resistance markers were rare; vanA (vancomycin resistance) and cfr (linezolid resistance) were not found.
Virulence genes
An overview on abundances of virulence-associated genes is given in Table 2. Most notably, half (50.00%) of the tested isolates were PVL-positive (Figure 1).
Table 2. Genes associated with virulence.
| Gene | Gene product/explanation | All isolates | MSSA only | MRSA only |
| agrI | Accessory gene regulator allele I | 206 (70.07%) | 162 (65.06%) | 44 (97.78%) |
| agrII | Accessory gene regulator allele II | 36 (12.24%) | 35 (14.06%) | 1 (2.22%) |
| agrIII | Accessory gene regulator allele III | 33 (11.22%) | 33 (13.25%) | 0 |
| agrIV | Accessory gene regulator allele IV | 12 (4.08%) | 12 (4.82%) | 0 |
| agr - | Unidentified agr allele or negatives | 7 (2.38%) | 7 (2.81%) | 0 |
| tst1 | Toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 | 5 (1.70%) | 5 (2.01%) | 0 |
| sea | Enterotoxin A | 36 (12.24%) | 15 (6.02%) | 21 (46.67%) |
| sea (N315)/sep | Enterotoxin A ( = P), allele from N315 | 14 (4.76%) | 14 (5.62%) | 0 |
| seb | Enterotoxin B | 24 (8.16%) | 24 (9.64%) | 0 |
| sec/l | Enterotoxin C and L | 20 (6.80%) | 20 (8.03%) | 0 |
| sed | Enterotoxin D | 63 (21.43%) | 63 (25.30%) | 0 (0%) |
| see | Enterotoxin E | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| seh | Enterotoxin H | 5 (1.70%) | 5 (2.01%) | 0 |
| sej | Enterotoxin J | 64 (21.77%) | 64 (25.70%) | 0 |
| sek/q | Enterotoxin K and Q | 110 (37.41%) | 67 (26.91%) | 43 (95.56%) |
| ser | Enterotoxin R | 63 (21.43%) | 63 (25.30%) | 0 |
| egc | egc cluster (seg, sei, selm, seln, selo, selu) | 90 (30.61%) | 89 (35.74%) | 1 (2.22%) |
| ORF CM14 | Enterotoxin homologue | 15 (5.10%) | 15 (6.02%) | 0 |
| lukF/S -PV | Panton-Valentine leukocidin | 147 (50%) | 130 (52.21%) | 17 (37.78%) |
| sak | Staphylokinase | 255 (86.73%) | 218 (87.55%) | 37 (82.22%) |
| chp | Chemotaxis inhibiting protein (CHIPS) | 158 (53.74%) | 142 (57.03%) | 16 (35.56%) |
| scn | Staphyl. complement inhibitor | 266 (90.48%) | 229 (91.97%) | 37 (82.22%) |
| etA | Exfoliative toxin serotype A | 11 (3.74%) | 11 (4.42%) | 0 |
| etB | Exfoliative toxin serotype B | 5 (1.70%) | 5 (2.01%) | 0 |
| etD | Exfoliative toxin D | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| edinA | Epidermal cell differentiation inhibitor | 13 (4.42%) | 13 (5.22%) | 0 |
| edinB | Epidermal cell differentiation inhibitor B | 27 (9.18%) | 27 (10.84%) | 0 |
| edinC | Epidermal cell differentiation inhibitor C | 4 (1.36%) | 4 (1.61%) | 0 |
| ACME | ACME locus | 18 (6.12%) | 0 | 18 (40%) |
| cna | Collagen adhesin | 136 (46.26%) | 109 (43.78%) | 27 (60%) |
| sasG | Staphylococcal protein G | 198 (67.35%) | 153 (61.45%) | 45 (100%) |
| cap5 | Capsule type 8 alleles | 166 (56.46%) | 148 (59.44%) | 18 (40%) |
| cap8 | Capsule type 5 alleles | 122 (41.50%) | 95 (38.15%) | 27 (60%) |
| cap - | Unidentified capsule type or negatives | 6 (2.04%) | 6 (2.41%) | 0 |
Typing data
An overview on typing data is provided in Table 3 and in Figure 1. Therefore, clonal complexes and strains as well as their abundances are only discussed shortly here.
Table 3. Typing data.
| CC | Strain | N (%) |
| CC1 | CC1-MSSA | 5 (1.70%) |
| CC5 | CC5-MSSA | 8 (2.72%) |
| CC5-MSSA [PVL+] | 14 (4.76%) | |
| CC5-MRSA-V [ACME+] | 1 (0.34%) | |
| CC6 | CC6-MSSA | 12 (4.08%) |
| CC6-MSSA [PVL+] | 2 (0.68%) | |
| CC7 | CC7-MSSA | 4 (1.36%) |
| CC8 | CC8-MSSA | 13 (4.42%) |
| CC8-MSSA [PVL+] | 60 (20.41%) | |
| ST8-MRSA-IV [PVL+/ACME+] | 15 (5.10%) | |
| ST8-MRSA-IV [PVL+/ACME+, truncated SCCmec] | 2 (0.68%) | |
| ST72-MSSA | 14 (4.76%) | |
| ST72-MSSA-SCCfus | 1 (0.34%) | |
| ST72-MSSA-SCCfus/kdp | 1 (0.34%) | |
| ST239-MRSA-III&SCCmer | 25 (8.50%) | |
| ST239-MRSA-III+ccrA/B4 | 2 (0.68%) | |
| CC9 | ST834-MSSA | 1 (0.34%) |
| CC12 | CC12-MSSA | 3 (1.02%) |
| CC15 | CC15-MSSA | 10 (3.40%) |
| CC20 | CC20-MSSA | 1 (0.34%) |
| CC30 | CC30-MSSA | 1 (0.34%) |
| CC30-MSSA [PVL+] | 26 (8.84%) | |
| CC45 | CC45-MSSA | 10 (3.40%) |
| CC97 | CC97-MSSA | 5 (1.70%) |
| CC101 | CC101-MSSA | 3 (1.02%) |
| CC121 | CC121-MSSA | 12 (4.08%) |
| CC152 | CC152-MSSA [PVL+] | 28 (9.52%) |
| CC188 | CC188-MSSA | 5 (1.70%) |
| CC398 | CC398-MSSA | 2 (0.68%) |
| ST1852 | ST1852-MSSA | 1 (0.34%) |
| “Alien”/ | CC1223/1594-MSSA | 1 (0.34%) |
| CC75-like strains | ST2250/2277-MSSA | 5 (1.70%) |
| ST2596dlv-MSSA | 1 (0.34%) |
Clonal Complex 5 Strains
Twenty-three isolates belonged to CC5. Most (n = 14) were PVL-positive MSSA; one was an ACME-positive MRSA harbouring a SCCmec V element.
Clonal Complex 8 Strains
CC8 was the most common lineage and it largely contributed to the high prevalence of PVL in the study group. 133 (45.24%; ST72 and ST239 included) of tested isolates belonged to this clonal complex and 20.41% of all isolates tested were PVL-positive CC8-MSSA. These isolates were virtually identical to each other. Out of the 60 isolates, 44 were indistinguishable using the current array, others differed only in some genes known to be localised on mobile elements (e.g., sed/j/r, beta-lactamase operon and other resistance markers, genes associated with haemolysin beta-converting phages). Another 15 isolates (5.10%) were assigned to the “USA300” strain (ST8-MRSA-IV [PVL+/ACME+]). Two isolates (0.68%) were closely related to this strain but lacked ccrA/B-2 genes. 9.18% of isolates belonged to ST239-MRSA-III, or, respectively, to a variant that additionally carried ccrA/B-4 recombinase genes. The remaining CC8 isolates were either PVL-negative CC8 MSSA sensu strictu, or belonged to ST72. ST72 is a distinct lineage that differs from other CC8 strains in several traits such as in the presence of the egc enterotoxin gene cluster. All ST72 strains were MSSA although one harboured genes associated with a “SCCfus” element (ccrA/B-1, fusC), whilst another contained these genes plus the SCC-associated kdp (potassium translocating) locus.
Clonal complex 152
Roughly one-tenth of the collection, 28 isolates, was assigned to this CC. All were PVL-positive, and all were MSSA. Three of them carried enterotoxin genes sek and seq, which seems to be an unusual feature in CC152 that has not been noted in previously characterised isolates [8], [9], [15], [16].
“Alien”, “Staphylococcus argenteus”-like strains
Seven isolates with deviant hybridisation profiles clustered into three distinct groups that were also confirmed by MLST. One group comprising five isolates yielded MLST sequences as well as hybridisation profiles similar to ST2250/2277. Capsule genes, agr genes and the coagulase gene coA were not detected. Other species-specific genes such as spa, sbi or nuc1 were present as well as some adhesion factors including sasG. PVL or enterotoxin genes were absent. All isolates were mecA-negative although blaZ and tet(K) were found occasionally. A further alternate pattern was demonstrated for one isolate that yielded a hybridisation signal with one agrB III probe and with probes for egc enterotoxin cluster genes. It lacked sasG and its hybridisation profile was identical to a previously characterised single locus variant of ST1223 [8]. A third group comprised one isolate displaying hybridisations with probes for agrB III and capsule type 5 associated genes. It apparently lacked coA, nuc1, enterotoxin genes and sasG. Its MLST profile was a double locus variant of ST2596 (151-269-20-34-256-261-49).
Discussion
Typing of pathogenic bacteria is a prerequisite to understanding their population structure and dynamics, and thus to controlling them. This study gives a first insight in the population structure not only of MRSA but also of MSSA for a country for which only few typing data are currently available. Limitations are mainly caused by the need to retrospectively use isolates from diagnostic procedures. It was unfortunately not yet possible to collect prospectively and to obtain a collection of isolates from healthy carriers that could serve as a control group in order to analyse the frequencies of certain virulence markers with regard to clinical presentations. It was also not possible to retrieve full clinical and supporting epidemiological information; this was due to the lack of an electronic system to manage laboratory information in this area.
Generally, the population of S. aureus on Trinidad and Tobago might fall into four epidemiological categories that likely originate from different epidemic waves in the past.
First, there are MSSA strains that are related to Western African strains. These include ST72, CC152, and possibly others for which not few data are currently available (such as ST1852), as well as the “alien” or “S. argenteus”-like lineages. ST72 has been already found in West Africa [17] and, as MRSA, in the Caribbean [18] and in Latin America [9]. CC152 is known to exist in Gabon [19], Mali [20] and Nigeria [21]. ST1852 has been found in Gabon according to the MLST database (http://saureus.mlst.net/sql/fulldetails.asp?id=3702&send=240). The group of “alien” or “S. argenteus”-like lineages were most similar to a cluster of strains observed mainly in Australia that were assigned to MLST lineages ST75, ST883, ST1303 and ST1304. It has been proposed to merge the Australian strains to a new species “S. argenteus” [12] based on their lack of the “golden” pigment, or at least to a distinct subspecies. Other notable differences of this lineage compared to “normal” S. aureus include the lack of signals for the agr regulatory locus used on the array caused by an unknown sequence related to agr I and IV alleles [22], although some of the Trinidad isolates yielded agrB III signals. Other “alien” or “S. argenteus”-like strains have been found in Cambodia, in sporadic (possibly, travel associated) cases from Europe, in French Guayana and, in animals (Straw-Coloured Fruit Bat, Eidolon helvum) from Western Africa [23]. Historically, an importation of Western African strains appears plausible given that a large proportion of the population of Trinidad and Tobago has African roots, and that the forced transportation of Africans into the New World during previous centuries also resulted in a transfer of pathogens and diseases, such as malaria, leprosy, smallpox, measles or yellow fever virus [24] into the Americas.
The second group are lineages that are globally spread, i.e., that could have been imported at anytime and from anywhere. Their geographic background and routes of dissemination might in future be elucidated by massive genome sequencing. CC5-, CC8-, CC30- and CC121-MSSA fall in this category; and these lineages have already been observed at Caribbean islands [18]. Most notable is the high prevalence of PVL-positive CC8-MSSA on Trinidad and Tobago. PVL-positive CC8-MSSA were very common on the islands, as noted previously [8], such that the causative agent from a recently reported fatal case of PVL-associated disease [7] was a rather typical specimen. As previously observed, the high prevalence of this strain in the Caribbean and its rarity in other parts of the world might indicate that the pandemic CC8 CA-MRSA strain “USA300” emerged in this region [8], [25]. However, it is not yet clear whether the abundance of PVL-positive CC8-MSSA in Trinidad and Tobago is paralleled on other West Indian/Caribbean islands and in Latin America or if it indicates a local outbreak situation. The extremely high homogeneity of all isolates described in this study (see above) as well as in two previous studies [7], [8] might support the latter theory.
A third group comprises ST239-MRSA-III and its variants. This is a globally spread healthcare-associated strain. It is very common in Trinidad and Tobago and is, or used to be, common in many other countries. Overall, it appears the MRSA rate has been rather constant in Trinidad and Tobago for the last decade, being 12.8% for isolates collected in 2001/2002 [2] and 15.2% in this study. The abundance of one single strain and its remarkable homogeneity suggests an outbreak scenario, i.e., transmission is sustained following an importation event that may have occurred several years ago. This was, for the same strain, observed also in Ireland where ST239-MRSA-III became the predominant strain in the 1980s [26], after repatriation of a single infected patient [27]. Since this strain is strictly hospital-associated, the implementation of stringent hospital infection control measures could substantially reduce the burden of MRSA to the healthcare systems on Trinidad and Tobago [3].
Finally, a forth group consists of recently emerging, possibly community-acquired, MRSA. In Trinidad and Tobago this is almost exclusively the PVL/ACME-positive ST8-MRSA-IV strain “USA300”. Interestingly, on other Caribbean islands, other strains might fulfil this role. A recent study shows the presence of typical “French” CA-MRSA clones on French West Indian islands [28]. This emphasises the importance of travel in the intercontinental transfer of epidemic clones. As mentioned above, it has been suspected that “USA300” emerged in this part of the world. However it is not yet clear where and when the SCCmec and the ACME elements were acquired. While ACME-negative PVL-positive ST8-MRSA-IV are often associated with Spain or Latin America, all isolates from Trinidad and Tobago were ACME-positives, i.e., more likely to be linked to the U.S. or other regions of origin. In order to assess the significance of ACME as an epidemiological marker and its possible correlation with geographic background, more data are still needed, especially from other Caribbean countries.
Open questions for further studies are whether CA-MRSA, i.e., “USA300”, can replace the related PVL-positive CC8-MSSA in direct competition under community conditions. This could be of high relevance for public health because such a development could render standard treatments ineffective. Another issue for future study is if “USA300” can compete with hospital-associated MRSA strains in hospitals and if it can spread in healthcare settings. In Northern America this was apparently the case, while in Germany or the U.K. one predominant strain (CC22-MRSA-IV, “Barnim Epidemic Strain/UK-EMRSA-15”) is by now so firmly rooted in healthcare facilities that it apparently hinders the spread of other strains including “USA300”. Currently, the rate of “USA300” in Trinidad and Tobago appears to be increasing. In a previous study, only three out of 80 MRSA isolates (3.75%) belonged to that strain [3]. In the present study, 17 out of the 45 MRSA isolates (37.78%) belonged to “USA300” (or to a ccrA/B-2-negative variant thereof). This warrants further studies and on-going surveillance. Future epidemiological studies should also focus on the population outside of healthcare facilities because a high burden of infections with both, MSSA and MRSA, can be expected in community settings in Trinidad and Tobago.
Supporting Information
Full demographic data and hybridisation profiles.
(PDF)
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge A. Ruppelt (Dresden), E. Müller, I. Engelmann, A. Reissig and J. Sachtschal (Jena) for excellent technical assistance and the hospital and laboratory staff of the facilities in Trinidad and Tobago for collecting isolates and gathering information. We thank Prof. E. Jacobs (Technical University of Dresden) and E. Ermantraut (Alere Technologies, Jena) for supporting this work as well as C. Scott for proof-reading the manuscript. R. Roberts wishes to thank the University of the West Indies St. Augustine for supporting this study.
Funding Statement
The authors have no support or funding to report.
References
- 1. Akpaka PE, Kissoon S, Rutherford C, Swanston WH, Jayaratne P (2007) Molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from regional hospitals in Trinidad and Tobago. Int J Infect Dis 11: 544–548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Akpaka PE, Kissoon S, Swanston WH, Monteil M (2006) Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from Trinidad & Tobago. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 5: 16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Monecke S, Nitschke H, Slickers P, Ehricht R, Swanston W, et al. (2012) Molecular epidemiology and characterisation of MRSA isolates from Trinidad and Tobago. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 31: 1497–1500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Orrett FA, Land M (2006) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus prevalence: current susceptibility patterns in Trinidad. BMC Infect Dis 6: 83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Swanston WH (1999) Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus . West Indian Med J 48: 20–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Orrett FA (2008) The emergence of mupirocin resistance among clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Trinidad: a first report. Jpn J Infect Dis 61: 107–110. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Akpaka PE, Monecke S, Swanston WH, Rao AC, Schulz R, et al. (2011) Methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus producing Panton-Valentine leukocidin toxin in Trinidad & Tobago: a case report. J Med Case Reports 5: 157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Monecke S, Müller E, Buechler J, Rejman J, Stieber B, et al. (2013) Rapid detection of Panton-Valentine leukocidin in Staphylococcus aureus cultures by monoclonal antibodies using a lateral flow assay. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 51: 487–495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Monecke S, Coombs G, Shore AC, Coleman DC, Akpaka P, et al. (2011) A Field Guide to Pandemic, Epidemic and Sporadic Clones of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus . PLoS One 6: e17936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Monecke S, Slickers P, Ehricht R (2008) Assignment of Staphylococcus aureus isolates to clonal complexes based on microarray analysis and pattern recognition. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 53: 237–251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Enright M, Day N, Davies C, Peacock S, Spratt B (2000) Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus . J Clin Microbiol 38: 1008–1015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Holt DC, Holden MTG, Tong SYC, Castillo-Ramirez S, Clarke L, et al. (2011) A Very Early-Branching Staphylococcus aureus Lineage Lacking the Carotenoid Pigment Staphyloxanthin. Genome Biology and Evolution 3: 881–895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Huson DH, Bryant D (2006) Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol 23: 254–267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Ito T, Katayama Y, Asada K, Mori N, Tsutsumimoto K, et al. (2001) Structural comparison of three types of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec integrated in the chromosome in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus . Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45: 1323–1336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Ditzen A, Ehricht R, Monecke S (2008) Disseminated cutaneous and pulmonary abscesses in an injecting drug user caused by a Panton-Valentine leucocidin-positive, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strain. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Monecke S, Slickers P, Ellington M, Kearns A, Ehricht R (2007) High diversity of Panton-Valentine leucocidin-positive, methicillin-susceptible isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and implications for the evolution of community-associated MRSA. Clin Microbiol Infect 13: 1157–1164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Schaumburg F, Köck R, Friedrich AW, Soulanoudjingar S, Ngoa UA, et al. (2011) Population Structure of Staphylococcus aureus from Remote African Babongo Pygmies. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 5: e1150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Uhlemann AC, Dumortier C, Hafer C, Taylor BS, Sánchez E J, et al. (2012) Molecular characterization of Staphylococcus aureus from outpatients in the Caribbean reveals the presence of pandemic clones. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 31: 505–511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Schaumburg F, Ngoa UA, Kosters K, Kock R, Adegnika AA, et al. (2011) Virulence factors and genotypes of Staphylococcus aureus from infection and carriage in Gabon. Clin Microbiol Infect [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Ruimy R, Maiga A, Armand-Lefevre L, Maiga I, Diallo A, et al. (2008) The carriage population of Staphylococcus aureus from Mali is composed of a combination of pandemic clones and the divergent Panton-Valentine leukocidin-positive genotype ST152. J Bacteriol 190: 3962–3968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Shittu AO, Okon K, Adesida S, Oyedara O, Witte W, et al. (2011) Antibiotic resistance and molecular epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus in Nigeria. BMC Microbiol 11: 92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Monecke S, Kanig H, Rudolph W, Muller E, Coombs G, et al. (2010) Characterisation of Australian MRSA strains ST75- and ST883-MRSA-IV and analysis of their accessory gene regulator locus. PLoS One 5: e14025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Akobi B, Aboderin O, Sasaki T, Shittu A (2012) Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from faecal samples of the Straw-Coloured Fruit Bat (Eidolon helvum) in Obafemi Awolowo University (OAU), Nigeria. BMC Microbiol 12: 279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.McNeill WH (1998) Plagues and Peoples. New York: Anchor. [Google Scholar]
- 25. Arias CA, Rincon S, Chowdhury S, Martinez E, Coronell W, et al. (2008) MRSA USA300 Clone and VREF – A U.S.-Colombian Connection? N Engl J Med 359: 2177–2179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Shore A, Rossney AS, Keane CT, Enright MC, Coleman DC (2005) Seven novel variants of the staphylococcal chromosomal cassette mec in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from Ireland. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49: 2070–2083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Humphreys H, Carroll JD, Keane CT, Cafferkey MT, Pomeroy HM, et al. (1990) Importation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Baghdad to Dublin and subsequent nosocomial spread. J Hosp Infect 15: 127–135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Chroboczek T, Boisset S, Rasigade JP, Meugnier H, Akpaka PE, et al. (2013) Major West Indies MRSA Clones in Human Beings: Do They Travel With Their Hosts? Journal of Travel Medicine 1195–1982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Full demographic data and hybridisation profiles.
(PDF)