Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1978 Nov;75(11):5471–5474. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.11.5471

Diamagnetic anisotropy and orientation of alpha helix in frog rhodopsin and meta II intermediate.

M Chabre
PMCID: PMC392986  PMID: 310121

Abstract

The diamagnetic anisotropy of retinal rod outer segments, and its variation upon bleaching, have been measured with a rotating field device. A large molar diamagnetic asymmetry is found for rhodopsin. This cannot be explained by an anisotropy of the aromatic side chains of the protein, nor by the orientation of the retinal chromophore. However, it can be accounted for by an orientation perpendicular to the disc membrane of a major proportion of the alpha-helical segments of the protein. Upon bleaching a decrease of 9 +/- 2% of the diamagnetic asymmetry is observed when going to the meta II intermediate. This change is not mainly due to a reorientation of the retinal, since it is practically insensitive to detachment of the chromophore by addition of NH2OH. Comparison with recent UV linear dichroism results indicate that it may be due to the rotation of a trytophan residue in the bleaching sequence.

Full text

PDF
5471

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bownds D., Brodie A. E. Light-sensitive swelling of isolated frog rod outer segments as an in vitro assay for visual transduction and dark adaptation. J Gen Physiol. 1975 Oct;66(4):407–425. doi: 10.1085/jgp.66.4.407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown P. K. Rhodopsin rotates in the visual receptor membrane. Nat New Biol. 1972 Mar 15;236(63):35–38. doi: 10.1038/newbio236035a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chabre M., Cavaggioni A. X-ray diffraction studies of retinal rods. II. Light effect on the osmotic properties. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1975 Mar 25;382(3):336–343. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(75)90275-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chabre M. X-ray diffraction studies of retinal rods. I. Structure of the disc membrane, effect of illumination. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1975 Mar 25;382(3):322–335. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(75)90274-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chagneux R., Chalazonitis N. Evaluation de l'anisotropie magnétique des cellules multimembranaires dans un champ magnétique constant (segments externes des bâtonnets de la rétine de grenouille. C R Acad Sci Hebd Seances Acad Sci D. 1972 Jan 10;274(2):317–320. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chalazonitis N., Chagneux R., Arvanitaki A. Rotation des segments externes des photorécepeurs dans le champ magnétique constant. C R Acad Sci Hebd Seances Acad Sci D. 1970 Jul 6;271(1):130–133. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hong F. T., Mauzerall D., Mauro A. Magnetic anisotropy and the orientation of retinal rods in a homogeneous magnetic field. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Jun;68(6):1283–1285. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.6.1283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hong K., Hubbell W. L. Preparation and properties of phospholipid bilayers containing rhodopsin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Sep;69(9):2617–2621. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.9.2617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. LIEBMAN P. A. In situ microspectrophotometric studies on the pigments of single retinal rods. Biophys J. 1962 Mar;2:161–178. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(62)86847-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Neugebauer D. C., Blaurock A. E. Magnetic orientation of purple membranes demonstrated by optical measurements and neutron scattering. FEBS Lett. 1977;78(1):31–35. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(77)80266-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Poo M., Cone R. A. Lateral diffusion of rhodopsin in the photoreceptor membrane. Nature. 1974 Feb 15;247(5441):438–441. doi: 10.1038/247438a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Saari J. C. The accessibility of bovine rhodopsin in photoreceptor membranes. J Cell Biol. 1974 Nov;63(2 Pt 1):480–491. doi: 10.1083/jcb.63.2.480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Saibil H., Chabre M., Worcester D. Neutron diffraction studies of retinal rod outer segment membranes. Nature. 1976 Jul 22;262(5566):266–270. doi: 10.1038/262266a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Shichi H., Shelton E. Assessment of physiological integrity of sonicated retinal rod membranes. J Supramol Struct. 1974;2(1):7–16. doi: 10.1002/jss.400020103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Verma S. P., Berliner L. J., Smith I. C. Cation-dependent light-induced structural changes in visual receptor membranes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1973 Dec 10;55(3):704–709. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(73)91201-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Worcester D. L. Structural origins of diamagnetic anisotropy in proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Nov;75(11):5475–5477. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.11.5475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES