Abstract
Vascularization of the placenta is a critical developmental process that ensures fetal viability. Although the vascular health of the placenta affects both maternal and fetal well being, relatively little is known about the early stages of placental vascular development. The ubiquitin ligase Ankyrin repeat, SOCS box-containing 4 (ASB4) promotes embryonic stem cell differentiation to vascular lineages and is highly expressed early in placental development. The transcriptional regulator Inhibitor of DNA binding 2 (ID2) negatively regulates vascular differentiation during development and is a target of many ubiquitin ligases. Due to their overlapping spatiotemporal expression pattern in the placenta and contrasting effects on vascular differentiation, we investigated whether ASB4 regulates ID2 through its ligase activity in the placenta and whether this activity mediates vascular differentiation. In mouse placentas, ASB4 expression is restricted to a subset of cells that express both stem cell and endothelial markers. Placentas that lack Asb4 display immature vascular patterning and retain expression of placental progenitor markers, including ID2 expression. Using JAR placental cells, we determined that ASB4 ubiquitinates and represses ID2 expression in a proteasome-dependent fashion. Expression of ASB4 in JAR cells and primary isolated trophoblast stem cells promotes the expression of differentiation markers. In functional endothelial co-culture assays, JAR cells ectopically expressing ASB4 increased endothelial cell turnover and stabilized endothelial tube formation, both of which are hallmarks of vascular differentiation within the placenta. Co-transfection of a degradation-resistant Id2 mutant with Asb4 inhibits both differentiation and functional responses. Lastly, deletion of Asb4 in mice induces a pathology that phenocopies human pre-eclampsia, including hypertension and proteinuria in late-stage pregnant females. These results indicate that ASB4 mediates vascular differentiation in the placenta via its degradation of ID2.
Introduction
Vasculogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels from the de novo production of endothelial cells, is divided into two categories: extraembryonic (occurring in the yolk sac and allantois) and embryonic (restricted to the embryo itself) [1]. Extraembryonic blood vessel formation precedes embryonic vasculogenesis and provides communication between the fetal circulation and the yolk sac to facilitate the transfer of nutrients and blood gases to the developing embryo [2]. Extraembryonic vasculogenesis supplies the allantois with primitive vessels in preparation for chorion fusion and is responsible for placental development and umbilical vessel formation, thus initiating the vascular connection between the fetal and maternal placental tissues [3]. This vascularization of the early placenta is crucial for the health and viability of not only the fetus, but also the mother [4]–[6]. However, little is known about the key mediators of early placental vascular development.
During human pregnancy, a population of undifferentiated multipotent placental cells, termed cytotrophoblasts (CTBs), differentiate into villous and extravillous trophoblasts that form and remodel the placental vasculature [7]. Villous trophoblasts have endothelial cell functions in the chorionic villi and also fuse into syncytiotrophoblasts [8]. Extravillous trophoblasts invade and migrate through the junctional zone of the placenta into the maternal decidua, where they replace the endothelial cells that line the spiral arteries [5]. These differentiated endothelial-like CTBs cells form tight junctions in the arteries, creating high capacity, low resistance blood vessels that allow for the exchange of blood gasses and nutrients from the mother to the developing fetus [9]. Though not entirely analogous, many of these same processes are conserved in mice [10]. That is, cells originating from a trophoblast (TB) stem cell progenitor migrate and invade the maternal arteries, but are thought to derive from trophoblast giant cell intermediaries, rather than cytotrophoblast lineages [11]. Disruption of the migration and invasion of differentiating TB cells can result in poorly formed vessels that lead to vascular insufficiency of the placenta and fetus, which in turn may result in pre-eclampsia [6]. Pre-eclampsia is characterized as the sudden onset of maternal hypertension, proteinuria, and edema [12]. The underlying pathophysiology of pre-eclampsia is thought to be rooted in vascular dysfunction [13], which may be due to aberrant early TB differentiation [14], though the precise genesis of this disease remains unknown.
Previous work in this laboratory demonstrated that Ankyrin repeat, SOCS box-containing 4 (ASB4) is an oxygen-sensitive E3 ligase that is abundantly expressed in the developing placenta and is highly upregulated during the differentiation of embryonic stem (ES) cells into endothelial cell lineages [15]. In addition, Asb4 transcription decreases when challenged by laminar shear stress in endothelial cells [16] highlighting the importance of ASB4 in the vasculature. ASB4 is one of 18 proteins in the ASB family, which are part of the suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS) super-family. ASB4 contains nine ankyrin repeats, seven of which are highly conserved, and a C-terminal SOCS box [17]. Ankyrin repeats are common 33-residue motifs that mediate protein-protein interactions and are found in proteins with functions ranging from development to transcription and cell cycle control [18]. Like other members of the ASB family [19], ASB4 associates with cullin, elongin, and ROC/Rbx RING-finger proteins (possibly because ASB4 lacks a RING-finger domain), which are all part of the ubiquitin ligase complex [15]. There is little evidence indicating a central function of ASB4. However, areas of high energy consumption (e.g., testes, heart, and brain) in adult mice have ASB4 ligase activity [20]–[22], reinforcing our hypothesis that ASB4 regulates vascular development and differentiation [23], [24]. Taken together, these findings suggest that ASB4 may mediate vascular differentiation through its ligase activity. However, few putative ASB4 substrates or in vivo functions are known.
Based on the high expression levels of Asb4 in the developing placenta, coinciding with the role of ASB4 in vascular differentiation [15], we reasoned that any putative substrates would share expression patterns and function within in the developing vasculature. Inhibitor of DNA binding 2 (ID2) is a tightly regulated mediator of placental development and vascular differentiation [25]–[27]. Further, ID2 is involved in other vascular events, including angiogenesis [26] and tumor cell migration and invasion [28]. ID2 is part of the anti-differentiation ID protein family, which shares significant structural similarity to the basic-helix-loop-helix (bHLH) family of proteins but lacks the basic domain [29]. ID proteins block the transcription of pro-differentiation elements by preventing bHLH dimerization and consequent translocation into the nucleus [30]. Due to the spatial and temporal overlap and the functional contrast between these two proteins, we hypothesized that ASB4 negatively regulates placental endothelial differentiation via and degradation of ID2. We also hypothesized that ASB4’s inhibition of ID2 would have a net pro-differentiation effect, and that loss of Asb4 would impair vascular differentiation within the developing placenta.
In this report, we investigated the role of ASB4 in TB cell differentiation and function and identified ID2 as a substrate of ASB4s ubiquitin ligase activity. Placentas isolated from Asb4−/− mice exhibited vascular differentiation defects, dysmorphic placental vessels, vascular dysfunction, and spontaneous abortion in a subset of fetuses. Using cell culture models, we found that ASB4 directly interacted with ID2, leading to ID2’s ubiquitination and subsequent degradation in JAR cells. Further, ASB4 promoted aspects of placental cell differentiation and endothelial cell replacement and vessel stability. Co-transfecting Asb4 with Id2 mutants that are resistant to proteasomal degradation abolished these effects. Lastly, pregnant Asb4−/− mice exhibited symptoms consistent with pre-eclampsia, including proteinuria and hypertension. Together, these findings indicate that ASB4 regulates TB cell differentiation into placental vasculature through the degradation of ID2 and that loss of Asb4 in the developing placenta contributes to placental disease.
Methods
Mouse Generation, Blood Pressure, and Proteinuria
The Asb4−/− mouse generation is described by Ferguson [31]. Briefly, exon 1 of Asb4 was flanked by loxP excision sites in the pAMC vector. Positive recombinants were electroporated into 129 SvEv ES cells and cultured with appropriate selection enzymes. ES cells were then injected into C57Bl/6 blastocysts and implanted into pseudopregnant females. The resultant chimera (Asb4flox/+) was then mated with EIIa-cre mice to excise the loxP sites. These mice were further bred to 129 SvEv wild-type mice to ensure germ-line transmission of the deletion and to outbreed the cre allele, generating Asb4+/− mice on the 129 SvEv background.
Maternal blood pressure was measured in conscious, pregnant mice at the gestational stage indicated using a CODA 8 tail-cuff monitor (Kent Scientific, Torrington, CT, USA). Mice were habituated to the machine for one day prior to data collection and assayed for five consecutive days. Urinary creatinine and albumin protein levels were measured using the Creatinine Companion and Albuwell M Test kits, respectively (Exocell, Philadelphia, PA, USA). Urine collection consisted of placing isolated mice in metabolic cages (a generous gift from Dr. Nobuyo Maeda [University of North Carolina]) for 24 hours. Food and water were provided ad libitum, and urine was collected in a microcentrifuge tube placed below the mesh flooring. Particulate matters and solids were removed from the samples by benchtop centrifugation, and urine was stored at −20°C until assayed. Placental disc invasion was assessed in E17.5 placentas as described in Dokras et al. [32]. All experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
In situ Hybridization, Immunofluorescence, and Immunohistochemistry
In situ hybridization for Asb4 was performed by the UNC In Situ Hybridization Core Facility on 16-µm thick cryosections of placental tissue harvested under RNase-free conditions from E11.5 wild-type mice. To generate the Asb4 probe, a ∼900 bp fragment of Asb4 was TA-cloned into pCRII-TOPO using the primers 5′-CTCCGAGGATGGACGGCATCACTGCCCCTATC-3′ and 5′-CTCAGGCTGTGCAGCAGGACGC-3′. The fragment was excised using NotI and BamHI restriction enzymes. Sense and anti-sense probes were generated by transcription with T7 and Sp6 polymerase, respectively. Probes were digoxigenin-labeled prior to hybridization.
Immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry were performed as described in Waldo et al. [33] on placental tissue sections at the indicated embryonic day. Briefly, tissue was harvested and either flash frozen or fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight with subsequent cryoprotection in 30% sucrose. Samples were embedded in OTC Compound (Sakura Finetek, Torrance, CA, USA) and sectioned into 6-µm thick slices by the UNC Histology Research Core Facility. Primary antibodies are as follows: antibody recognizing mouse ASB4 was generated as in Ferguson [31]; c-kit (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA); PECAM (Becton-Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA); cytokeratin-17, integrin alpha V, and integrin beta 4 (Abcam); ID2 (Cell Signalling Technology); Von Willebrand factor (Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA); FITC-conjugated Dolichos biflorus agglutinin (DBA) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA); and phospho-histone 3 (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Alexa Fluor antibodies (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA) and ABC Elite kits and diaminobenzidine (Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA, USA) were used to detect primary antibodies. Apoptosis was quantified using the ApopTag In Situ Apoptosis detection kit (Millipore). Hematoxylin and eosin staining was performed on fixed frozen sections by the UNC Histology Core Facility. Tissues and cells were imaged on a Nikon E800 upright fluorescent microscope, and ImageJ (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/) was used for quantification and intensity measurements.
Cell Culture and Immunoblotting
JAR choriocarcinoma cells were obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA) and maintained in MEM supplemented with 10% FBS. HEK-293T/17 cells and 2H-11 endothelial cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. 2H-11 cells were conditioned to constitutively ectopically express ASB4 by transfecting cells with p3xFLAG-CMV10-Asb4, and stable clones were selected with G418 for 12 days. Transgene expression was confirmed by anti-FLAG immunoblotting. A stable Asb4 knockdown cell line was created in 2H-11 cells using mouse Asb4 shRNA lentiviral particles. Endogenous Asb4 expression was screened by reverse transcription-PCR. Transfection reactions were performed using LTX and Plus reagent (Invitrogen) according to Wolfe [34]. pCMV2B-Asb4 and p3xFLAG-CMV10-Asb4 were generated and used as described in Ferguson [31]. Id2-Sport6 and pCS2-Id2 mutants were generous gifts from Dr. Aaron Ciechanover (Technion-Israel Institute of Technology). siRNA transfections were performed using X-tremeGENE siRNA transfection reagent (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The siAsb4 duplex sequence is as follows: 5′-CCACAAUGCUACCAUCAA-3′ and 5′-AGUUGAUGGUAGCAUUG-3′, and siRNA was synthesized and duplexed by Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA, USA). Cell lysis reactions were performed in cell lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA) containing 1% Triton (immunoblots) or 0.5% NP-40 (immunoprecipitations). Cell fractionation assays were performed using NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic extraction kit (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Cycloheximide was used at 50 µM in DMSO. Immunoprecipitation reactions were lysed as described above and crosslinked with 2 mM DSP (dithiobis[succinimidylpropionate]) (Thermo Scientific) for 2 hours at 4°C. Lysates were pre-cleared with the appropriate species IgG and Protein A/G beads (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 1 hour at 4°C and then incubated with either anti-c-myc or anti-FLAG affinity gel (Sigma-Aldrich). Primary antibodies include ID2 (Cell Signaling Technology); FLAG-HRP, myc-HRP, and GAPDH (Sigma-Aldrich); KDM1 and MEK1 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA); and HA-HRP (Roche). Proteins were detected using HRP-conjugated, species-appropriate secondary antibodies (Sigma-Aldrich) and developed using TMA-6 reagents (Lumigen, Southfield, MA, USA).
In vitro Ubiquitination Assay
Recombinant ID2 was generated using an ID2-GST fusion construct (pGEX-2T-Id2) graciously supplied by Dr. Antonio Iavarone (Columbia University) in BL21(DE3)pLysS chemicompetent cells (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Recombinant ASB4 was generated by ectopically expressing p3xFLAG-CMV10-Asb4 in HEK-293T/17 cells. E1 (Ube1), E2 (UbcH5a), ATP, and ubiquitin were purchased from Boston Biochem (Cambridge, MA, USA). The reaction buffer was as follows: 50 nM E1, 2.5 µM E2, 2.5 µM ASB4, 5 µM ID2, 2.5 mM ATP, 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 50 mM KCl, 0.2 mM DTT, and 250 µM ubiquitin. Reactions were performed at 37°C for 1 hour.
Placental Cell Differentiation Assays
Trophoblast stem cells (TBSCs) were isolated as previously described [35] from E7.5 embryos. Cells were grown for 6–8 weeks under normal culture conditions to minimize spontaneous differentiation. Cells were cultured for 72 hours without serum and then visualized for the presence of trophoblast giant cells, a hallmark of TBSC differentiation in culture. JAR cells were induced to secrete human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) using N(6),2'-O-dibutyryladenosine 3′:5′ cyclic monophosphate (dbcAMP, Sigma-Aldrich) at 1 mM for 24 hours as described in Hohn et al. [36]. hCG was measured using an ELISA (DRG International, Mountainside, NJ, USA), and concentrations were normalized to cell number. The JAR cell-mediated apoptosis of 2H-11 endothelial cells was evaluated based on Chen et al. [37], using the TUNEL-based ApopTag staining kit (Millipore) as an index of apoptosis. To assay endothelial network stability mediated by placental cells, we adapted the JAR cell/endothelial tube association assay from Aldo et al. [38], using 2H-11 endothelial cells as our vascular network substrate. JAR cells were transfected as indicated, then plated upon 2H-11 cells that had formed tube-like networks. Total area of the JAR/2H-11 network was measured using ImageJ and quantified.
Unless otherwise noted, statistical analysis for all quantification was performed using a two-tailed, unpaired Student’s t-Test. p values are reported in the respective figure legends.
Results
ASB4 is Expressed in Undifferentiated TB Cells and is Required for Placental Differentiation
Asb4 is localized to areas of high vascular activity and is highly expressed in the developing placenta [15], [31]. ID2 is also critical in the early development of the placenta, including the maturation of the placental vasculature [26]. Therefore, we hypothesized that ASB4 would be an important modulator of differentiation in the placental vasculature. As shown in Figure 1A (4x magnification) and 1A’ (20x magnification), Asb4 mRNA was only expressed in the labyrinth zone of E11.5 placentas. This zone exhibits high vascular activity [39] and contains the reservoir of TB cells that cross the junctional zone into the maternal decidua as they mature into functional endothelial-like cells [40], [41]. This observation supports our hypothesis that ASB4 is involved in early vascular differentiation events in the placenta.
To test whether ASB4 is expressed in differentiating cells committing to a vascular lineage, we examined placentas at E11.5, when stem cells undergo both self-renewal and differentiation and the cells adopting a vascular lineage migrate from the stem cell niche [42]. Wild-type placental tissue sections were co-labeled for ASB4 and markers of various stages of TB-to-endothelial differentiation. ASB4 co-localized with markers of pluripotent, cells, specifically in a subset of cells expressing the general stem cell marker c-kit (Figure 1B) [43]. At this stage in mouse placental development, invading and differentiating trophoblasts express c-kit, but terminally differentiated trophoblast giant cells and spongiotrohoplasts do not. Further, c-kit and its ligand SCF are implicated have been implicated as being required for trophoblast spreading and implantation, due to their role in trophoblast differentiation [44]. In addition, ASB4 also co-localized with a subset of PECAM-positive cells (Figure 1B’), suggesting that ASB4 is involved with cells that are differentiating into vascular lineages at this time point. Further supporting a specific role in early vascularization, ASB4 did not co-localize with cytokeratin 17, which is a marker of mature placental endothelial-like cells (Figure 1B”).
Because ASB4 co-localized with early markers of the endothelium, we hypothesized that Asb4 deletion would lead to functional consequences later in development. Specifically, if ASB4 promoted TB-to-endothelial cell differentiation, then placentas of Asb4−/− mice should have less mature endothelium than those of wild-type mice. Placentas from wild-type and Asb4−/− mice were examined at E17.5 and labeled for cytokeratin 17 (Cyto17) to visualize differentiated, mature endothelial-like cells. In wild-type mice, there abundant Cyto17 expression in the lining of the vessels, while in Asb4−/− mouse placentas there were fewer mature Cyto17-positive cells (Figure 2A), and this decrease was not due to impaired proliferation or increased apoptosis (Figure S1). During normal gestation, placental cells undergoing TB-to-endothelial differentiation undergo integrin “switching” [45], in which undifferentiated TB cells that adopt a vascular phenotype express beta 4 integrins. Later in gestation, when blood vessels have differentiated, beta 4 integrins are turned off, and alpha V integrin is highly expressed [42], [46], consistent with what we see in our wild-type mice (Figure 2B, top panels). Asb4−/− placentas failed to express integrin alpha V, but maintained beta 4 integrin expression late in gestation (Figure 2B, bottom panels), consistent with a failure of the placenta to undergo integrin switching, indicating an immature and undifferentiated placenta. Placental disc invasion, during which the fetal components of the placenta extend and expand into the maternal decidual layers, was more shallow in Asb4−/− placentas compared with wild-type mice (Figure 2C) further confirming that placental development is compromised in Asb4−/− mice in a manner that is consistent with abnormal differentiation [32]. Additional observations indicate that the vasculature expressed markers of injury and dysfunction in near-term (E17.5) Asb4−/− placentas (Figure S2A) and were mislocalized within the junctional zone rather than the stage-appropriate outer deciduas (Figures S2B and S2C). These results indicate that differentiation defects in Asb4−/− placentas may have deleterious effects that are observed into late gestation.
Because Asb4−/− placentas showed signs of early differentiation defects and impaired vascularization (Figures 2A, B), we examined ID2 expression due to its anti-differentiation role in the placenta [25]. We hypothesized that ID2 expression would be increased in the Asb4−/− placenta due to ID2’s anti-differentiation role in the placenta, and thus might underlie the observed differentiation defects in Asb4−/− placentas. In wild-type mice, ID2 expression is downregulated as TB cells differentiate. However, in whole placental cell lysates at E12.5, placentas from Asb4−/− mice have a ∼2 fold increase in ID2 expression compared with placentas from wild-type mice (Figure 3A), and this finding is confirmed by immunofluorescence in E13.5 placentas (Figure 3B). These data indicate that a subset of TB cell remain undifferentiated in Asb4−/− placentas, and provide evidence that ASB4 may mediate ID2 expression in the placenta.
ASB4 Negatively Regulates ID2 Expression through Polyubiquitination and Proteasome Dependant Degradation
Given our observation that ID2 was significantly upregulated in Asb4−/− placentas, we hypothesized that ID2 may be a substrate of ASB4s ubiquitin ligase activity. To test this hypothesis, wild-type Id2 was co-transfected with Asb4 in JAR cells, and ID2 expression was examined. JAR cells are a desirable cell type because they do not express endogenous ID2 or ASB4, allowing us to modulate both proteins without endogenous protein interference. Because ID2 is rapidly turned over by myriad other proteins, resulting in a very short half-life (Figure S4B and [47]), we added a low dose of MG-132 to experiments in Figure 4A-E to slow proteasomal degradation events and visualize ID2 protein expression. ASB4 degraded ID2 in a dose-dependent manner in Asb4 and Id2 co-transfected JAR cells (Figure 4A). To test whether ID2 expression increased in the absence of ASB4, we transfected Id2 into 2H-11 endothelial cells that stably overexpressed Asb4. ID2 expression increased when co-transfected with increasing amounts of an siRNA duplex targeting Asb4 (siAsb4) (Figure 4B). To determine whether ASB4 binds directly to ID2, we performed co-immunoprecipitation assays using co-transfected 3x-FLAG-tagged Asb4 and 6x-myc-tagged Id2 in JAR cells. As shown in Figure 4C, ASB4 was detected when ID2 was immunoprecipitated and, conversely, ID2 was detected when ASB4 was immunoprecipitated (Figure 4D). Further, we observed a dose response of the ID2-ASB4 interaction in 2H-11 cells that had increasing amounts of Id2 transfected in (Figure 4E). Together, these data show that in placental cells, ASB4 can mediate ID2 expression and that ASB4 and ID2 interact with each other.
Because ASB4 is an E3 ligase, we hypothesized that ASB4 regulates ID2 protein levels by polyubiquitinating ID2 and targeting it for proteasomal degradation. To test this hypothesis, we first co-transfected HA-tagged ubiquitin and myc-tagged Id2 in 2H-11 cells that either express endogenous Asb4 or have constitutively knocked down Asb4 expression to levels undetectable at either the transcript or protein level. We immunoprecipitated ID2 and blotted for HA, expecting a ubiquitin “smear” if ID2 was modified by polyubiquitination. As shown in Figure 4F, ID2 ubiquitination increased dramatically in cells that expressed Asb4, compared to cells that do not express Asb4. We then tested whether ASB4 could directly ubiquitinate ID2 by performing an in vitro ubiquitination assay. We combined recombinant ID2 with ASB4 and the minimal components required for ubiquitination and saw that ASB4 ubiquitinated ID2 four-fold more than the reaction absent of ASB4 (Figure 4G, lane 6 versus lane 3). Importantly, these reactions were performed in the absence of Roc1/Rbx1, the RING-finger protein that associates with ASB4, indicating that ASB4 does not require a RING-finger protein for ubiquitination. Previous reports into the mechanism of ID2 ubiquitination have demonstrated that ID2 is only susceptible to N-terminal ubiquitination [47]. To determine whether ID2’s N-terminus is sensitive to ASB4-mediated degradation, we co-expressed ASB4 with ID2 mutants that lack all lysine residues (LL-ID2) or have 6x-myc tags on either the N-terminus (degradation resistant, DR-ID2) or C-terminus (degradation sensitive, DS-ID2) in JAR cells. Only the N-terminally tagged ID2 (DR-ID2) expression level remained unchanged in the presence of ASB4 (Figure S3), indicating that ASB4 mediates ID2 degradation via N-terminal ubiquitination.
To confirm our hypothesis that ASB4 degrades ID2 in a proteasome-dependent manner, we completely abolished proteasomal activity with a high dose of MG-132 to cells ectopically expressing ID2 and either ASB4 or vector control and compared ID2 expression to cells that were not treated with MG-132. In cells treated with DMSO, ASB4 expression led to reduced expression of ID2 as in Figure 4A. While a high dose of MG-132 slightly increased total ID2 expression in the absence of ASB4, this increase was not diminished by the co-expression of ASB4 in the presence of MG-132 indicating that ID2 is degraded via the proteasome (Figure S4A). Further, when cells ectopically expressing ASB4 and ID2 were treated with cycloheximide to block protein translation, the half-life of ID2 decreased in the presence of ASB4 (Figure S4B). To ensure that the reduction in ID2 expression in the soluble fraction assayed above was not caused by ASB4 inducing ID2 translocation to an insoluble part of the cell, we performed a cell fractionation assay (Figure S4C). There was no observable accumulation of ID2 in any of the cell fractions when co-expressed with ASB4, suggesting that ID2 is not translocated to other insoluble fractions of the cell upon treatment with ASB4.
ASB4 Mediates Placental Cell Differentiation and Function in vitro
In culture, TB cells can induce endothelial turnover [37] and increase the stability of endothelial cell networks [38], recapitulating the in vivo events that occur when TB cells are differentiating into endothelial-like cells. Because Asb4−/− placentas express markers of undifferentiated TB cells (Figure 2), we hypothesized that ASB4 would increase the JAR cell-meditated apoptosis of 2H-11 endothelial cells as well as the vascular stability of vessel-like networks formed by 2H-11 cells in culture. We observed that JAR cells transfected with ASB4 induced 2H-11 endothelial cells to apoptose 3-fold more than vector control cells. Co-expression of wild-type ID2 did not attenuate apoptosis, but JAR cells co-expressing DR-ID2 and ASB4 resulted in significantly fewer TUNEL-positive 2H-11 cells compared with JAR cells that were only transfected with ASB4. Of note, DR-ID2 and ASB4 co-expression elevated apoptosis compared with vector control cells, but this was significantly less than cells that did express ASB4 alone (Figure 5A, B). These data demonstrate that ASB4 promotes a functional vascular phenotype that recapitulates in vivo endothelial replacement with differentiating TB cells and that ID2 represses this effect.
Previous reports demonstrated that endothelial cells induce TB migration in culture and that TB cells stabilize these endothelial vascular networks [38], representing a model of the in vivo events that occur during TB differentiation [41]. To examine whether ASB4 could promote TB cell stabilization of endothelial cell networks, we measured the ability of JAR cells transfected with Asb4 and Id2 to form stable vascular networks over time, using branching 2H-11 tube-like structures as the strata upon which JAR cells could migrate to and stabilize. In isolation, 2H-11 cells plated on Matrigel consistently form branching tube-like structures within approximately four hours [48] but devolve into spheroid cluster of cells within 16 hours (data not shown). However, the addition of trophoblast cells can stabilize these networks for days and even weeks in culture [38]. Therefore, we hypothesized that Asb4-transfected JAR cells would stabilize these 2H-11 cell networks for significantly longer than vector-transfected JAR control cells. JAR cells expressing ASB4, either alone or co-transfected with wild-type Id2, were able to maintain and stabilize the 2H-11 vascular networks well past 16 hours, when vector control cell networks had destabilized (Figure 5C, D). Cells co-transfected with Asb4 and DR-Id2 quickly and significantly destabilized 2H-11 networks at 16 hours and were indistinguishable from control networks after 48 hours. These results indicate that ASB4 promotes TB endothelial-like cell function in vitro and that ASB4 mediates these effects by degrading ID2, since DR-ID2 attenuates this ASB4-mediated effect in placental cells.
Because ASB4 mediates vascular differentiation in ES cells [15] and we have demonstrated that ASB4 negatively regulated the anti-differentiation protein ID2 (Figure 4A, B), we hypothesized that ASB4 would mediate placental cell differentiation through the regulation of ID2 and tested this hypothesis in vitro. First, TBSCs were isolated from the extraembryonic ectoderm of early post-implantation (E7.5) wild-type and Asb4−/− embryos and cultured on a feeder layer of mitotically inactivated MEFs, which promote the long-term maintenance and proliferation of undifferentiated stem cells [15]. Large-scale multipotent differentiation is expected for the first several passages, so cultures were grown 6–8 weeks prior to serum-withdrawal. Terminally differentiated cells were sub-cultured out, leaving only the undifferentiated embryoid bodies of TBSCs. Although the factors required for TBSC-to-endothelial transformation are not yet know, TBSCs readily differentiate into trophoblast giant cells (TGCs) [35]. Based on previous work from this laboratory [49], we used serum withdrawal to promote TBSC differentiation. Thus, we used the appearance of TGCs as an index of TBSC differentiation. After serum withdrawal for 72 hours, we visualized the isolated cells with bright-field microscopy. As shown in Figure 6A, wild-type TBSCs largely differentiated into large, multinucleated TGCs, which were morphologically very different from the small, clustered, undifferentiated TBSCs that form embryoid bodies as seen in Asb4−/− cells (right panel). Further, differentiated TGCs laid flat on the culture dish, while undifferentiated embryoid bodies had raised edges and appeared more convex on the culture dish, allowing for easy identification.
To determine whether ASB4’s influence on TB cell differentiation involves ID2, we examined human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) secretion, a well-established marker of trophoblast differentiation [36], in JAR cells that ectopically express ASB4 and ID2. hCG secretion was stimulated via the addition of dbcAMP to the growth medium following the indicated transfection for 48 hours and was subsequently measured in the medium by ELISA. ASB4 stimulated hCG production approximately 2 fold compared with the vector control. Co-transfecting wild-type Id2 with ASB4 did not abolish hCG production, but co-transfection of Asb4 and DR-Id2 prevented hCG stimulation (Figure 6B). Together with data in Figure 5, these results illustrate that ASB4 promotes placental cell differentiation and function in vitro, and that ID2 mutants resistant to ASB4-mediated degradation can inhibit the differentiation and function of TB cells in vitro.
Asb4−/− Mice Phenocopy Human Patients with Pre-eclampsia
Because our data indicate that ASB4 mediates placental cell differentiation and function (Figures 4 and 5), and that Asb4 deletion has negative consequences in the placental vasculature throughout development (Figure 2 and Figure S2), we investigated whether the placental abnormalities found in Asb4−/− mouse placentas contributed to the placenta-specific disease pre-eclampsia, whose pathogenesis may stem from abnormal placental vascular development [6]. Asb4−/− female mice produced significantly smaller litter sizes compared with wild-type female mice (Figure 7B) due to spontaneous abortion mid-gestation (Figure 7A). Similarly, Asb4+/− breeding pairs produced non-Mendelian ratios of pups that were significantly skewed toward higher numbers of wild-type animals at the expense of Asb4−/− pups (Figure 7C). When investigating the source of lethality in the Asb4−/− pregnancies, we observed that fetal growth halted at approximately E10.5 to E11.5 in a subset of Asb4−/− embryos. These embryos lacked functioning placental vascularization (Figure 7A, and data not shown), which may contribute to the abortion and fetal reabsorption seen in Asb4−/− embryos [4].
Because ID2 expression is elevated in trophoblast cells placentas of women with pre-eclampsia [25] and Asb4−/− mouse placentas (Figure 2D, E), combined with the vascular defects observed in Asb4−/− placentas (Figure 2A, Figure S2), we investigated whether our Asb4−/− mice shared traits with human patients with pre-eclampsia, which is widely believed to be a disease of the placental vasculature [14]. Two hallmarks of pre-eclampsia are maternal hypertension and proteinuria during late-stage pregnancy. Pregnant Asb4−/− female mice had increased blood pressure during late gestation (E14-term), as compared to both gestationally age-matched wild-type mice and Asb4−/− mice during the first week of gestation (Figure 7D). Further, pregnant Asb4−/− female mice had higher ratios of albumin:creatinine protein in their urine during late stage pregnancy than wild-type mice (Figure 7E). Together, these results suggest that Asb4−/− mice phenocopy human pre-eclampsia and may serve as a model for both early placental vascularization and human placental disease.
Discussion
Strict control over the vascular patterning of the placenta is critical for both maternal and fetal survival [50]. Aberrant differentiation events early in development negatively affect the later formation of the vasculature [41], but relatively little is known what drives early differentiation events. Although none of the limited data that identify putative substrates or functions of ASB4 support a central function for ASB4 in vivo [15], [16], [22], [51], [52], prior work from this laboratory has shown that ASB4 is involved in early vascular differentiation and is highly expressed in the developing placenta [15]. Therefore, we utilized Asb4−/− mice, in conjunction with placenta-derived cells, to determine the function of ASB4 during placental vascular differentiation. Consistent with our previous work [15], we found that ASB4 is largely localized to the early endothelium in the placenta. We also found that Asb4 deletion induces the expression of markers of undifferentiation in the placenta, including the anti-differentiation protein ID2. Based on this data, along with the expression pattern of various markers of TB cells and endothelial differentiation in Asb4−/− placentas, we determined that ASB4 is involved in the earlier stages of differentiation events, and the consequences of Asb4 deletion persist into later stages of gestation resulting in insufficient placental vascularization.
Due to the limited information found in the literature, identifying a substrate of ASB4s ligase activity was central to this investigation. Taking a candidate approach, we reasoned that any ASB4 substrate would have to share its narrow spatiotemporal expression pattern, contribute to vascular phenotypes, and be involved in differentiation. We determined that the ID family of proteins would fulfill these criteria [53]. The ID proteins (ID1 to ID4) are known to mediate differentiation and cell cycle control, which impact cell functions such as metastasis, angiogenesis, apoptosis, and maintaining stemness [30], [53]–[55]. Within these processes, there is significant, but not ubiquitous redundancy between the individual ID proteins [56]–[59]. Further, ID proteins, and ID2 specifically, are known to be tightly regulated by E3 ligases [47], [60], [61]. Therefore, ID2 was chosen for investigation in this study due to its involvement in differentiation [54], vascular development [62], and placental maturation [25]. Using cell culture and biochemical techniques, we determined that ASB4 can directly negatively regulate ID2 expression.
Placental remodeling requires three unique vascular events for proper function: TBSC differentiation, replacement of endothelium with trophoblast cells, and vascular stabilization to form high capacity vessels [41]. Possibly because the JAR cell line was isolated from CTB cells in choriocarcinomas, these cells can be induced to mimic in vivo cells under certain conditions. We adapted several methods to assess cell differentiation and function in culture, and whether ASB4 promoted these events through the inhibition of ID2. Although these methods do not completely recapitulate in vivo events, they collectively indicate that ASB4 has a pro-vascular differentiation function in placental cells. By ectopically expressing ASB4 in the JAR cells, we were able to determine that ASB4 promotes all three aspects of placental vascular remodeling. In addition, using isolated TBSCs, we were able to observe primary TB cell differentiation in culture. TBSCs that lack Asb4 remained in undifferentiated embryoid bodies, in contrast to wild-type TBSCs which differentiated into TGCs upon serum withdrawal. Because exact markers of TBSC and endothelial differentiation are not well defined in the placenta, future studies will be needed to more precisely address these differentiation events.
Using Asb4−/− mice as a model for ASB4 function in vivo, we explored the phenotypic consequences of Asb4 deletion, focusing particularly on the early placenta. Although the majority of Asb4−/− embryos survived to term, all had placentas with varying degrees of vascular dysfunction. Further, embryonic lethality occurred in a subset of Asb4−/− embryos at approximately E10.5 due to gross endothelial disruption in the placenta. Furthermore, placental vascular dysfunction in Asb4−/− placentas also had deleterious effects on pregnant mice, phenocopying women with pre-eclampsia. Though extremely common, little is known about the pathogenesis of pre-eclampsia [63] and to date there is no cure other than delivery of the placenta. Both third trimester hypertension and proteinuria, hallmarks of pre-eclampsia, were recapitulated in Asb4−/− mothers. This disease state, in conjunction with the differentiation defects in the placenta of Asb4−/− mice, provides a unique model of early vascular development. Ultimately, this model of pre-eclampsia and vascular dysfunction may be used to investigate therapeutic strategies for treating pre-eclampsia and other diseases of the placenta.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Laura Dyer and Dr. Andrea Portbury for their critical review of the manuscript. We thank Dr. Sarah Ronnebaum, Dr. Jonathan Schisler, and Pamela Lockyer for their technical help.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by NIH grant 5R01HL061656 to CP. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Ferguson JE 3rd, Kelley RW, Patterson C (2005) Mechanisms of endothelial differentiation in embryonic vasculogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 25: 2246–2254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Drake CJ, Fleming PA (2000) Vasculogenesis in the day 6.5 to 9.5 mouse embryo. Blood 95: 1671–1679. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Downs KM (1998) The murine allantois. Curr Top Dev Biol 39: 1–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Conway SJ, Kruzynska-Frejtag A, Kneer PL, Machnicki M, Koushik SV (2003) What cardiovascular defect does my prenatal mouse mutant have, and why? Genesis 35: 1–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Kam EP, Gardner L, Loke YW, King A (1999) The role of trophoblast in the physiological change in decidual spiral arteries. Hum Reprod 14: 2131–2138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Myatt L, Webster RP (2009) Vascular biology of preeclampsia. J Thromb Haemost 7: 375–384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. James JL, Stone PR, Chamley LW (2005) Cytotrophoblast differentiation in the first trimester of pregnancy: evidence for separate progenitors of extravillous trophoblasts and syncytiotrophoblast. Reproduction 130: 95–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Mayhew TM (2001) Villous trophoblast of human placenta: a coherent view of its turnover, repair and contributions to villous development and maturation. Histol Histopathol 16: 1213–1224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Fisher SJ, Damsky CH (1993) Human cytotrophoblast invasion. Semin Cell Biol 4: 183–188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Adamson SL, Lu Y, Whiteley KJ, Holmyard D, Hemberger M, et al. (2002) Interactions between trophoblast cells and the maternal and fetal circulation in the mouse placenta. Dev Biol 250: 358–373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Red-Horse K, Zhou Y, Genbacev O, Prakobphol A, Foulk R, et al. (2004) Trophoblast differentiation during embryo implantation and formation of the maternal-fetal interface. J Clin Invest 114: 744–754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Maynard SE, Min JY, Merchan J, Lim KH, Li J, et al. (2003) Excess placental soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt1) may contribute to endothelial dysfunction, hypertension, and proteinuria in preeclampsia. J Clin Invest 111: 649–658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Roberts JM, Taylor RN, Musci TJ, Rodgers GM, Hubel CA, et al. (1989) Preeclampsia: an endothelial cell disorder. Am J Obstet Gynecol 161: 1200–1204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Fisher SJ (2004) The placental problem: linking abnormal cytotrophoblast differentiation to the maternal symptoms of preeclampsia. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2: 53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Ferguson JE 3rd, Wu Y, Smith K, Charles P, Powers K, et al. (2007) ASB4 is a hydroxylation substrate of FIH and promotes vascular differentiation via an oxygen-dependent mechanism. Mol Cell Biol 27: 6407–6419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Bode M, Wu Y, Pi X, Lockyer P, Dechyapirom W, et al. (2011) Regulation of ankyrin repeat and suppressor of cytokine signalling box protein 4 expression in the immortalized murine endothelial cell lines MS1 and SVR: a role for tumour necrosis factor alpha and oxygen. Cell Biochem Funct 29: 334–341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Kile BT, Viney EM, Willson TA, Brodnicki TC, Cancilla MR, et al. (2000) Cloning and characterization of the genes encoding the ankyrin repeat and SOCS box-containing proteins Asb-1, Asb-2, Asb-3 and Asb-4. Gene 258: 31–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Mosavi LK, Cammett TJ, Desrosiers DC, Peng ZY (2004) The ankyrin repeat as molecular architecture for protein recognition. Protein Sci 13: 1435–1448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Kohroki J, Nishiyama T, Nakamura T, Masuho Y (2005) ASB proteins interact with Cullin5 and Rbx2 to form E3 ubiquitin ligase complexes. FEBS Lett 579: 6796–6802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Li JY, Chai B, Zhang W, Wu X, Zhang C, et al. (2011) Ankyrin repeat and SOCS box containing protein 4 (Asb-4) colocalizes with insulin receptor substrate 4 (IRS4) in the hypothalamic neurons and mediates IRS4 degradation. BMC Neurosci 12: 95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Li JY, Chai BX, Zhang W, Wang H, Mulholland MW (2010) Expression of ankyrin repeat and suppressor of cytokine signaling box protein 4 (Asb-4) in proopiomelanocortin neurons of the arcuate nucleus of mice produces a hyperphagic, lean phenotype. Endocrinology 151: 134–142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Kim SK, Rhim SY, Lee MR, Kim JS, Kim HJ, et al. (2008) Stage-specific expression of ankyrin and SOCS box protein-4 (Asb-4) during spermatogenesis. Mol Cells 25: 317–321. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. De Val S (2011) Key transcriptional regulators of early vascular development. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 31: 1469–1475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Luttun A, Carmeliet P (2003) De novo vasculogenesis in the heart. Cardiovasc Res 58: 378–389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Janatpour MJ, McMaster MT, Genbacev O, Zhou Y, Dong J, et al. (2000) Id-2 regulates critical aspects of human cytotrophoblast differentiation, invasion and migration. Development 127: 549–558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Lasorella A, Rothschild G, Yokota Y, Russell RG, Iavarone A (2005) Id2 mediates tumor initiation, proliferation, and angiogenesis in Rb mutant mice. Mol Cell Biol 25: 3563–3574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Liu YP, Burleigh D, Durning M, Hudson L, Chiu IM, et al. (2004) Id2 is a primary partner for the E2–2 basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor in the human placenta. Mol Cell Endocrinol 222: 83–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Coma S, Amin DN, Shimizu A, Lasorella A, Iavarone A, et al. (2010) Id2 promotes tumor cell migration and invasion through transcriptional repression of semaphorin 3F. Cancer Res 70: 3823–3832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Wong MV, Palasingam P, Kolatkar PR (2012) Cloning, purification and preliminary X-ray data analysis of the human ID2 homodimer. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun 68: 1354–1358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Zebedee Z, Hara E (2001) Id proteins in cell cycle control and cellular senescence. Oncogene 20: 8317–8325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ferguson JE (2007) Investigating the Role of Ankyrin Repeat and SOCS Box Protein 4 (ASB4) During Vascular Development: The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
- 32. Dokras A, Hoffmann DS, Eastvold JS, Kienzle MF, Gruman LM, et al. (2006) Severe feto-placental abnormalities precede the onset of hypertension and proteinuria in a mouse model of preeclampsia. Biol Reprod 75: 899–907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Waldo KL, Kumiski D, Kirby ML (1996) Cardiac neural crest is essential for the persistence rather than the formation of an arch artery. Dev Dyn 205: 281–292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wolfe M (2006) Culture and Transfection of Human Choriocarcinoma Cells. In: Soares M, Hunt J, editors. Placenta and Trophoblast: Humana Press. 229–239. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 35.Himeno E, Tanaka S, Kunath T (2008) Isolation and manipulation of mouse trophoblast stem cells. Curr Protoc Stem Cell Biol Chapter 1: Unit 1E 4. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 36. Hohn HP, Linke M, Ugele B, Denker HW (1998) Differentiation markers and invasiveness: discordant regulation in normal trophoblast and choriocarcinoma cells. Exp Cell Res 244: 249–258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Chen Q, Stone PR, McCowan LM, Chamley LW (2005) Interaction of Jar choriocarcinoma cells with endothelial cell monolayers. Placenta 26: 617–625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Aldo PB, Krikun G, Visintin I, Lockwood C, Romero R, et al. (2007) A novel three-dimensional in vitro system to study trophoblast-endothelium cell interactions. Am J Reprod Immunol 58: 98–110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Muntener M, Hsu YC (1977) Development of trophoblast and placenta of the mouse. A reinvestigation with regard to the in vitro culture of mouse trophoblast and placenta. Acta Anat (Basel) 98: 241–252. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Uy GD, Downs KM, Gardner RL (2002) Inhibition of trophoblast stem cell potential in chorionic ectoderm coincides with occlusion of the ectoplacental cavity in the mouse. Development 129: 3913–3924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Zhou Y, Fisher SJ, Janatpour M, Genbacev O, Dejana E, et al. (1997) Human cytotrophoblasts adopt a vascular phenotype as they differentiate. A strategy for successful endovascular invasion? J Clin Invest 99: 2139–2151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Damsky CH, Fitzgerald ML, Fisher SJ (1992) Distribution patterns of extracellular matrix components and adhesion receptors are intricately modulated during first trimester cytotrophoblast differentiation along the invasive pathway, in vivo. J Clin Invest 89: 210–222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Horie K, Fujita J, Takakura K, Kanzaki H, Kaneko Y, et al. (1992) Expression of c-kit protein during placental development. Biol Reprod 47: 614–620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Mitsunari M, Harada T, Tanikawa M, Iwabe T, Taniguchi F, et al. (1999) The potential role of stem cell factor and its receptor c-kit in the mouse blastocyst implantation. Mol Hum Reprod 5: 874–879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Merviel P, Challier JC, Carbillon L, Foidart JM, Uzan S (2001) The role of integrins in human embryo implantation. Fetal Diagn Ther 16: 364–371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Vatansever HS, Inan VS, Lacin S, Koyuncu F (2003) Immunolocalization of alphaV, alpha3 and beta1 integrins in the human placenta with pre-eclampsia. Acta Histochem 105: 253–260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Fajerman I, Schwartz AL, Ciechanover A (2004) Degradation of the Id2 developmental regulator: targeting via N-terminal ubiquitination. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 314: 505–512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Walter-Yohrling J, Morgenbesser S, Rouleau C, Bagley R, Callahan M, et al. (2004) Murine endothelial cell lines as models of tumor endothelial cells. Clin Cancer Res 10: 2179–2189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Moser M, Binder O, Wu Y, Aitsebaomo J, Ren R, et al. (2003) BMPER, a novel endothelial cell precursor-derived protein, antagonizes bone morphogenetic protein signaling and endothelial cell differentiation. Mol Cell Biol 23: 5664–5679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Rossant J, Cross JC (2001) Placental development: lessons from mouse mutants. Nat Rev Genet 2: 538–548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Li JY, Chai BX, Zhang W, Liu YQ, Ammori JB, et al. (2007) Ankyrin repeat and SOCS box containing protein 4 (Asb-4) interacts with GPS1 (CSN1) and inhibits c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase activity. Cell Signal 19: 1185–1192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Mizuno Y, Sotomaru Y, Katsuzawa Y, Kono T, Meguro M, et al. (2002) Asb4, Ata3, and Dcn are novel imprinted genes identified by high-throughput screening using RIKEN cDNA microarray. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 290: 1499–1505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Norton JD (2000) ID helix-loop-helix proteins in cell growth, differentiation and tumorigenesis. J Cell Sci 113 (Pt 22): 3897–3905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Lasorella A, Uo T, Iavarone A (2001) Id proteins at the cross-road of development and cancer. Oncogene 20: 8326–8333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Niola F, Zhao X, Singh D, Castano A, Sullivan R, et al. (2012) Id proteins synchronize stemness and anchorage to the niche of neural stem cells. Nat Cell Biol 14: 477–487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Langlands K, Yin X, Anand G, Prochownik EV (1997) Differential interactions of Id proteins with basic-helix-loop-helix transcription factors. J Biol Chem 272: 19785–19793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Carmeliet P (1999) Developmental biology. Controlling the cellular brakes. Nature 401: 657–658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Miyazono K, Miyazawa K (2002) Id: a target of BMP signaling. Sci STKE 2002: pe40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Samanta J, Kessler JA (2004) Interactions between ID and OLIG proteins mediate the inhibitory effects of BMP4 on oligodendroglial differentiation. Development 131: 4131–4142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Bounpheng MA, Dimas JJ, Dodds SG, Christy BA (1999) Degradation of Id proteins by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. FASEB J 13: 2257–2264. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Lasorella A, Stegmuller J, Guardavaccaro D, Liu G, Carro MS, et al. (2006) Degradation of Id2 by the anaphase-promoting complex couples cell cycle exit and axonal growth. Nature 442: 471–474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Benezra R, Rafii S, Lyden D (2001) The Id proteins and angiogenesis. Oncogene 20: 8334–8341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Mutter WP, Karumanchi SA (2008) Molecular mechanisms of preeclampsia. Microvasc Res 75: 1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.