Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1978 Dec;75(12):6332–6336. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.12.6332

Classifications and comparisons of multilocus recombination distributions

Samuel Karlin 1, Uri Liberman 1
PMCID: PMC393176  PMID: 16592601

Abstract

Various classifications and representations of multilocus recombination structures are delineated based on generalized notions of linkage values and recombination rates. An important class of recombination distributions (called the count-location chiasma process) is parameterized by a distribution of the number of crossover events and, for each such crossover count, by a conditional distribution of crossover locations. A number of properties of this recombination structure are developed. A multilocus definition of a “natural” recombination range is set forth. Orderings among recombination distributions in the multilocus setting are also discussed. Comparisons are made in terms of complete linkage, free assortment and noninterference schemes serving as standards.

Keywords: linkage values, recombination-segregation distribution, nodule count-location processes, natural and more recombination

Full text

PDF
6332

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Carpenter A. T. Electron microscopy of meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster females: II. The recombination nodule--a recombination-associated structure at pachytene? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Aug;72(8):3186–3189. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.8.3186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Karlin S. General two-locus selection models: some objectives, results and interpretations. Theor Popul Biol. 1975 Jun;7(3):364–398. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(75)90025-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. OWEN A. R. G. The theory of genetical recombination. Adv Genet. 1950;3:117–157. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2660(08)60084-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. SCHNELL F. W. Some general formulations of linkage effects in inbreeding. Genetics. 1961 Aug;46:947–957. doi: 10.1093/genetics/46.8.947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. White R. L., Fox M. S. On the molecular basis of high negative interference. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Apr;71(4):1544–1548. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.4.1544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. White R., Fox M. S. Genetic heterozygosity in unreplicated bacteriophage lambda recombinants. Genetics. 1975 Sep;81(1):33–50. doi: 10.1093/genetics/81.1.33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Zickler D. Development of the synaptonemal complex and the "recombination nodules" during meiotic prophase in the seven bivalents of the fungus Sordaria macrospora Auersw. Chromosoma. 1977 Jun 23;61(4):289–316. doi: 10.1007/BF00288615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES