Skip to main content
Rare Diseases logoLink to Rare Diseases
. 2013 Sep 5;1:e26314. doi: 10.4161/rdis.26314

Mutation in SNAP25 as a novel genetic cause of epilepsy and intellectual disability

Luis Rohena 1, Julie Neidich 2, Megan Truitt Cho 1, Kelly DF Gonzalez 2, Sha Tang 2, Orrin Devinsky 3, Wendy K Chung 4,*
PMCID: PMC3932847  PMID: 25003006

Abstract

Whole exome sequencing using a parent-child trio design to identify de novo mutations provides an efficient method to identify novel genes for rare diseases with low reproductive fitness that are difficult to study by more classical genetic methods of linkage analysis. We describe a 15 y old female with severe static encephalopathy, intellectual disability, and generalized epilepsy. After extensive metabolic and genetic testing, whole exome sequencing identified a novel de novo variant in Synaptosomal-associated protein-25 (SNAP25), c.142G > T p.Phe48Val alteration. This variant is predicted to be damaging by all prediction algorithms. SNAP25 is part of the soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) protein complex which is involved in exocytotic release of neurotransmitters. Genetic alterations in Snap25 in animal models can cause anxiety-related behavior, ataxia and seizures. We suggest that SNAP25 mutations in humans are a novel genetic cause of intellectual disability and epilepsy.

Keywords: SNAP25, intellectual disability, epilepsy, whole exome sequencing, novel mutation

Introduction

Many rare genetic conditions with low reproductive fitness have been difficult to genetically define using methods of linkage and association. Genetic conditions with strong negative selection and reduced reproductive fitness can in part be explained by genes with a high new mutation rate.1 Whole exome sequencing now offers the opportunity to define many of these rare genetic conditions, even within single families. Common, serious neuropsychiatric disorders like intellectual disability, schizophrenia, and autism are genetically heterogeneous and frequently caused by rare de novo mutations.1-4

Over 340 genes are associated with epilepsy, some of which are associated with other specific phenotypic features.5 Neuronal migration disorders causing lissencephaly and heterotopias have been linked to mutations in LIS1, DCX, ARX, TUBA1A, RELN, FLNA, and ARFGEF2.6 TSC1 and TSC2 mutations impair regulation of the mTOR pathway and cause tuberous sclerosis.5 Rett and atypical Rett syndromes have been linked to mutations in CDKL5, FOXG1 and MECP2.7,8 Early onset epileptic encephalopathy has been associated with mutations in ALDH7A1, ATP6AP2, PCDH19, POLG, PNPO, SLC2A1, SLC25A22, SPTAN1, and STXBP1.5 Mutations in KCNQ2 and KCNQ3, which control voltage gated potassium channels, have been identified in patients with benign familial neonatal seizures.9 Myoclonic epilepsy has been linked to mutations in CACNB4, EFHC1, GABRA1, CSTB, EPM2A, EPM2B, and PRICKLE1.5,10 The most common familial epilepsies result from mutations in the voltage gated sodium channels genes SCN1A, SCN1B, and SCN2A.6

Whole exome sequencing was initiated on a patient with intellectual disability and epilepsy who had evaded a specific diagnosis despite significant laboratory investigations into the cause of her disorder. A mutation in a gene previously not associated with a specific human disease was identified. This analysis demonstrates the strength of whole exome sequencing as a means of molecular diagnosis for patients who have non-specific neuropsychiatric presentations.

Results

Case presentation

The proband is a 15 y old female, delivered at 41 weeks of gestation. Early prenatal ultrasounds showed bilateral choroid plexus cysts in the brain which were no longer observed by 21 weeks of gestation. APGAR scores were 8 and 9 at 1 and 5 min, respectively. Birth weight was appropriate at 3360 g. The newborn physical exam identified hip dysplasia requiring a Pavlik harness for 4 mo.

Developmentally, she was always delayed in reaching milestones. At 6 weeks of age, the proband’s mother was concerned that she was not making eye contact. At 2.5 mo she was unable to lift her head when prone. Generalized hypotonia was noted at 4 mo. She first sat unsupported at 3 y of age. She can now ambulate with assistance, but does so infrequently. She is non-verbal. She gained weight well from 0–5 mo, maintaining her weight between the 50th–75th centiles but dropped to the 5th centile by 8 mo. Head circumference was also maintained at the 50th centile from 0–5 mo but dropped to the 5th centile by 9 mo. There was no history of developmental regression, but rather a severe delay in development from early life. To optimize nutrition and increase her caloric intake, nasogastric feeds were started at 1 y of age followed shortly thereafter with gastrostomy tube placement.

Seizures began at 5 mo of age with episodes of repetitive blinking, upward eye deviation and impaired awareness, and were later associated with bilateral kicking and arm abduction accompanied by eye deviation to either side. Video EEG monitoring revealed mild generalized slowing, 2–2.5 Hz generalized spike-and-slow wave complexes. Subsequent video EEG studies revealed (1) mild generalized slowing, (2) interictal partial and symptomatic generalized discharges, and (3) ictal partial and generalized seizures with left (95%) or right-sided (~5%) hemiclonic seizures and lateralized frontocentral discharges (~90% left-sided, ~10% right sided) as well as seizures with bilateral motor features at onset, including tonic-clonic seizures, with generalized discharges. She currently averages 3–10 focal clonic seizures per hour, with an average duration of 15 s. Tonic-clonic seizures occur once every two weeks. Her most recent video EEG showed frequent epileptiform discharges but did not comprise more than 30% of her waking or sleep background. Seizures remain refractory to more than eight antiepileptic drugs in up to three drug combinations, as well as a ketogenic diet and intravenous methylprednisolone trials.

At 5 y of age, she required bilateral varus rotation osteotomies of the proximal femurs. She required spinal fusion at 11 y of age for scoliosis.

Her current neurological examination reveals that she is nonverbal, with global developmental delays. She can intermittently follow simple commands and make intermittent, but fleeting eye contact. Eye tracking is impaired. She is microcephalic with diminished oralmotor tone, excessive drooling and spastic quadriparesis.

The proband is an only child. There is no family history of birth defects, seizures, intellectual disability or consanguinity.

Brain MRI at 8 mo showed delayed myelination, but no structural abnormalities. MR spectroscopy showed increased lactate, raising concern for a mitochondrial disorder but given normal cerebrospinal fluid lactate levels it was thought that the MR spectroscopy lactate peaks were secondary to frequent seizure activity.

Metabolic screening including quantitative plasma amino acids, acylcarnitine profile, carbohydrate deficient transferrin electrophoresis, urine organic acid analysis, and cerebrospinal fluid neurotransmitters, amino acids, lactate and glucose were all normal. Sulfite oxidase testing for molybdenum cofactor deficiency was normal. Muscle biopsy pathology and electron microscopy, and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation enzyme activity in muscle were normal. Electromyogram was normal. Karyotype, subtelomeric FISH, and chromosome microarray were normal. Molecular genetic testing for MECP2, CDKL5, Angelman syndrome methylation, ACAT1, FOXG1, Mitochondrial DNA 3243 allele was negative, MERRF testing on muscle, 101 nuclear encoded mitochondrial genes, 53 epilepsy genes, and 64 genes associated with X linked intellectual disabilities were all normal.

Whole exome sequencing

Exome sequencing of the family trio (proband, mother and father) resulted in an average of ~16 Gb of sequence per sample (Fig. 1A). Mean coverage of captured regions was 119x per sample, with > 90% covered with at least 10x coverage, an average of >91% base call quality of Q30 or greater, and an overall average mean quality score of <Q35. Stepwise filtering removal of common SNPs, intergenic and 3′/5′ UTR variants, non-splice-related intronic variants, and synonymous variants resulted in ~12 000 variants per sample. Family history inheritance model filtering based on de novo autosomal and X-linked dominant and recessive inheritance models of the proband, mother and father revealed 37 genes (55 unique alterations) (Table 1). Manual review of each alteration to rule out sequencing artifacts and polymorphisms along with medical interpretation to rule out genes lacking clinical overlap with the patient's evaluated phenotype resulted in 7 genes (10 unique alterations) (Tables 1 and 2). Review of the individuals genes demonstrated that heterozygous and homozygous loss of function mutations in FAM90A1 and SGK223 were common in normal individuals in the ESP database, suggesting these are not responsible for the phenotype. PCMTD1 has pseudogenes with the same 9 bp insertion suggesting this is a mapping error. Among the three possible recessive genes ABCC10 and CAPRIN2, and IGSF3, at least one of the alleles was predicted to be benign by either PolyPhen-2 or SIFT and none of the three are highly expressed within the brain, making them less likely candidates. Among these, the most likely gene with one alteration with potential clinical relevance underwent confirmation and co-segregation analysis using automated fluorescence dideoxy sequencing: SNAP25 c.142G > T (p.V48F) (Fig. 1B).

graphic file with name rdis-1-e26314-g1.jpg

Figure 1. (A) Family pedigree. Shaded shapes indicate affected individuals. (B) Next-gen sequence alignment of the SNAP25: c.142G > T (p.V48F alteration in the proband, mother, and father. (C) Sequence conservation plots at the mutated site amino acid position across different species.

Table 1. Variant filtering based on inheritance model and interpretation.

  Post-Inheritance Model Filtering Manual Reviewa Notable Candidate Genesb
Autosomal Dominant Genes (Alterations)
22 (24)
4 (4)
1 (1)
Autosomal Recessive Genes (Alterations)
14 (30)
3 (6)
0 (0)
X-linked Recessive Genes (Alterations)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
X-linked Dominant Genes (Alterations)
1 (1)
0 (0)
0 (0)
Y-linked Genes (Alterations)
N/A
N/A
N/A
Total Genes (Alterations) 37 (55) 7 (10) 1 (1)

a Manual filtering involves the removal of genes unrelated to the patient's evaluated phenotype and alterations considered benign. bNotable Candidate Genes: Genes with disease phenotype association overlapping that of the proband.

Table 2. Summary of variants remaining after manual filtering.

Autosomal Dominant
Gene Symbol/Model Novel/Characterized Gene Variant Genotype
PolyPhen-2 SIFT dbSNP Allele Frequency
Comments
Proband Mother Father ESP 1000 Genomes
SNAP25
Novel
c.142G>T p.V48F
+/-
-/-
-/-
damaging
damaging
N/A
N/A
N/A
No LoF variants in ESP; few variants in ESP
FAM90A1
Novel
c.10del p.R4VfsX12
+/-
-/-
-/-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Many LoF variants in ESP, up to 144 alleles, homozygous fs changes
PCMTD1
Novel
c.921_922ins9 p.K307delins4
+/-
-/-
-/-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Pseudogenes, some pseudogenes with this 9 bp ins
SGK223 Novel c.1029_1030ins8 p.C343WfsX28 +/- -/- -/- N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Many LoF variants in ESP, up to 999 alleles, homozygous fs changes
Autosomal Recessive
Gene Symbol/Model Novel/Characterized Gene Variant Genotype
PolyPhen-2 SIFT dbSNP Allele Frequency
Comments
Proband Mother Father ESP 1000 Genomes
ABCC10
Novel
c.1472G>A p.R491Q
+/-
+/-
-/-
benign
tolerated
rs141254177
0.02%
N/A
 
c.2696G>A p.R899Q
+/-
-/-
+/-
benign
damaging
rs142010618
0.02%
N/A
 
CAPRIN2
Novel
c.1649A>G p.N550S
+/-
+/-
-/-
benign
tolerated
N/A
N/A
N/A
 
c.1118G>A p.R373H
+/-
-/-
+/-
benign
tolerated
rs146283389
0.05%
0.09%
 
IGSF3 Novel c.1945C>T p.R649C
+/-
-/-
-/-
damaging
damaging
rs139816559
N/A
N/A
 
c.1379C>A p.P460Q +/- +/- -/- benign damaging rs147792935 0.06% N/A  

N/A, not available; blank boxes indicate not applicable

The c.142G > T (p.V48F) alteration is located in exon 4 (3rd coding exon) of the SNAP25 gene. The V48 amino acid is highly conserved throughout vertebrates (Fig. 1C). The amino acid substitution results in changing a non-polar, neutral amino acid to a larger, non-polar, neutral amino acid and is predicted to be probably damaging by PolyPhen16 and deleterious by SIFT17 in silico analysis. Based on data from the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (ESP),14 no alterations were observed among 6,503 individuals tested (0.0%). Allele frequency data for this nucleotide position not currently available from the 1000 Genomes Project14 and the alteration is not currently listed in the Database of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (dbSNP). Confirmatory sequencing and co-segregation analysis using automated fluorescence dideoxy sequencing revealed that the alteration was absent in the mother and father, establishing a de novo origin of the alteration.

Discussion

We suggest that the novel variant, c.142G > T in SNAP25, identified via whole exome sequencing is the likely cause of the proband’s epilepsy and intellectual disabilities. SNAP25 is one of the best characterized components of the SNARE protein complex which is involved in the exocytotic release of neurotransmitters during synaptic transmission by mediating synaptic vesicle fusion.19 SNAP25 assembles with syntaxin-1 and synaptobrevin to form the exocytotic fusion complex in neurons.20 Electroretinogram recordings of Snap25 null drosophila show a complete loss of synaptic transmission.21

SNAP25 has not previously been associated with any Mendelian human disease. It was discovered that blind-drunk mice (Bdr), which display ataxia and impaired gait, harbor a heterozygous single amino acid substitution (I67T) in Snap25.22 Substituting serine at position 187 with alanine in Snap25 induced anxiety related behavior in the mouse.23 The Coloboma mouse, which is heterozygous for 4.6Mb deletion of chromosome 2 which encompasses 12 genes including Snap25, have shown seizure predisposition.24

Snap25 exists as two isoforms.25 Mice with only Snap25a develop seizures and show learning deficits and anxiety. Snap25b knockout/ Snap25a knock-in mouse mutants that only express Snap25a showed frequent episodes of tremors and seizure activity.25 This experiment demonstrated that small changes in the regulation of Snap25 caused neurological problems including epilepsy.

Synapsin 1 (Syn1) and Synapsin II (SynII) knock out mice exhibit seizure activity.26SYN1 mutations are associated with seizure activity in humans.27 Synapsins are presynaptic proteins implicated in the regulation of neurotransmitter release.6 This was an important model confirming the role of neurotransmitter release machinery in epilepsy.9

Syntaxin binding protein-1 (STXBP1) is another component of the SNARE complex, and it is implicated in regulating synaptic vesicle docking and fusion similar to SNAP25.22 Mutations in STXBP1 cause early infantile epilepsy.28-30 Paciorkowski et al. review of cases of infantile spasms associated with copy number variants and demonstrated that many components of the SNARE complex are implicated in epilepsy.31

Review of the DECIPHER database32 revealed 10 patients who had deletions of chromosome 20 including SNAP25. Four patients had no description of their phenotype. Three patients had seizures, and one had intellectual disability. This is a small number of patients but it further supports the association of SNAP25 mutations and seizures and intellectual disability.

We hypothesize that the novel p.Phe48Val de novo variant in SNAP25 disturbs neurotransmitter release at the synapse leading to seizures and generalized central nervous system dysfunction leading to intellectual disability. A major limitation of this study is that there is only a single patient identified with a de novo novel variant in SNAP25. Functional in vitro analysis to further define the impact of the altered gene would also substantiate these findings. We encourage others engaged in the genetic study of children with epilepsy and/or intellectual disabilities to include SNAP25 as a candidate gene in genetic studies to find additional similarly affected patients in order to better define this novel neurological disorder.

Methods

DNA from the parents and proband were prepared using the SureSelect Target Enrichment System (Agilent Technologies).11 The exome libraries were then applied to the solid surface flow cell for clonal amplification and sequencing using paired-end, 100-cycle chemistry on the Illumina HiSeq 2000 (Illumina). Sequence quality filtering script was executed with the Illumina CASAVA software (ver 1.8.2, Illumina). Data yield (Mbases), %PF (pass-filter), # of reads, % of raw clusters per lane, and quality scores were examined in Demultiplex_Stats.htm file. The sequence data were aligned to the reference human genome (GRCh37) and variant calls were generated using CASAVA. Exons plus at least 2 bases into the 5′ and 3′ ends of all the introns were analyzed. The Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD),12 the Single Nucleotide Polymorphism database (dbSNP),13 1000 genomes,14 HapMap data,15 and online search engines (e.g., PubMed) were used to search for previously described gene mutations and polymorphisms. Stepwise filtering removed common SNPs, intergenic and 3′/5′ UTR variants, non-splice-related intronic variants, and synonymous variants. Variants were then filtered further based on possible recessive, X linked or de novo mutations. Data were annotated with the Ambry Variant Analyzer tool (AVA), including nucleotide and amino acid conservation, biochemical nature of amino acid substitutions, population frequency (ESP and 1000 genomes,14 and predicted functional impact (including PolyPhen16 and SIFT17 in silico prediction tools). Multiple sequence alignments were viewed using IGV (integrative genomics Viewer software).18 Identified candidate alterations were confirmed using automated fluorescence dideoxy sequencing in the proband and parents on an ABI3730 (Life Technologies) using standard procedures.

Acknowledgments

We thank the patient and her family for their contribution.

Glossary

Abbreviations:

ADHD

attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

DICIPHER

Database of Chromosomal Imbalance and Phenotype in Humans Using Ensembl Resources

EEG

electroencephalogram

FISH

fluorescent in Situ hybridization

MERRF

myoclonic epilepsy ragged red fibers

SNAP25

synaptosomal associated protein-25kDa

SNARE

soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor

SNP

single nucleotide polymorphisms

10.4161/rdis.26314

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflict of interest was disclosed.

References

  • 1.Julie G, Hamdan FF, Rouleau GA. A strategy to identify de novo mutations in common disorders such as autism and schizophrenia. J Vis Exp. 2011 doi: 10.3791/2534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gilissen C, Hoischen A, Brunner HG, Veltman JA. Unlocking Mendelian disease using exome sequencing. Genome Biol. 2011;12:228. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-9-228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Vissers LE, de Ligt J, Gilissen C, Janssen I, Steehouwer M, de Vries P, van Lier B, Arts P, Wieskamp N, del Rosario M, et al. A de novo paradigm for mental retardation. Nat Genet. 2010;42:1109–12. doi: 10.1038/ng.712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.O’Roak BJ, Deriziotis P, Lee C, Vives L, Schwartz JJ, Girirajan S, Karakoc E, Mackenzie AP, Ng SB, Baker C, et al. Exome sequencing in sporadic autism spectrum disorders identifies severe de novo mutations. Nat Genet. 2011;43:585–9. doi: 10.1038/ng.835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Garofalo S, Cornacchione M, Di Costanzo A. From genetics to genomics of epilepsy. Neurol Res Int. 2012;2012:876234. doi: 10.1155/2012/876234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bozzi Y, Casarosa S, Caleo M. Epilepsy as a neurodevelopmental disorder. Front Psychiatry. 2012;3:19. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ariani F, Hayek G, Rondinella D, Artuso R, Mencarelli MA, Spanhol-Rosseto A, Pollazzon M, Buoni S, Spiga O, Ricciardi S, et al. FOXG1 is responsible for the congenital variant of Rett syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2008;83:89–93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.05.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tao J, Van Esch H, Hagedorn-Greiwe M, Hoffmann K, Moser B, Raynaud M, Sperner J, Fryns JP, Schwinger E, Gécz J, et al. Mutations in the X-linked cyclin-dependent kinase-like 5 (CDKL5/STK9) gene are associated with severe neurodevelopmental retardation. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;75:1149–54. doi: 10.1086/426460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Noebels JL. The biology of epilepsy genes. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2003;26:599–625. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.010302.081210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bassuk AG, Wallace RH, Buhr A, Buller AR, Afawi Z, Shimojo M, Miyata S, Chen S, Gonzalez-Alegre P, Griesbach HL, et al. A homozygous mutation in human PRICKLE1 causes an autosomal-recessive progressive myoclonus epilepsy-ataxia syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2008;83:572–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gnirke A, Melnikov A, Maguire J, Rogov P, LeProust EM, Brockman W, Fennell T, Giannoukos G, Fisher S, Russ C, et al. Solution hybrid selection with ultra-long oligonucleotides for massively parallel targeted sequencing. Nat Biotechnol. 2009;27:182–9. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Stenson PD, Mort M, Ball EV, Howells K, Phillips AD, Thomas NS, Cooper DN. The Human Gene Mutation Database: 2008 update. Genome Med. 2009;1:13. doi: 10.1186/gm13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sherry ST, Ward MH, Kholodov M, Baker J, Phan L, Smigielski EM, Sirotkin K. dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:308–11. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.1.308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Abecasis GR, Altshuler D, Auton A, Brooks LD, Durbin RM, Gibbs RA, Hurles ME, McVean GA, 1000 Genomes Project Consortium A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing. Nature. 2010;467:1061–73. doi: 10.1038/nature09534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.International HapMap Consortium The International HapMap Project. Nature. 2003;426:789–96. doi: 10.1038/nature02168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, Bork P, Kondrashov AS, Sunyaev SR. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods. 2010;7:248–9. doi: 10.1038/nmeth0410-248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kumar P, Henikoff S, Ng PC. Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:1073–81. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2009.86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Robinson JT, Thorvaldsdóttir H, Winckler W, Guttman M, Lander ES, Getz G, Mesirov JP. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29:24–6. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Südhof TC, Rizo J. Synaptic vesicle exocytosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011;3:1–14. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a005637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hodel A. SNAP-25. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 1998;30:1069–73. doi: 10.1016/S1357-2725(98)00079-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Vilinsky I, Stewart BA, Drummond J, Robinson I, Deitcher DL. A Drosophila SNAP-25 null mutant reveals context-dependent redundancy with SNAP-24 in neurotransmission. Genetics. 2002;162:259–71. doi: 10.1093/genetics/162.1.259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jeans AF, Oliver PL, Johnson R, Capogna M, Vikman J, Molnár Z, Babbs A, Partridge CJ, Salehi A, Bengtsson M, et al. A dominant mutation in Snap25 causes impaired vesicle trafficking, sensorimotor gating, and ataxia in the blind-drunk mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:2431–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0610222104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kataoka M, Yamamori S, Suzuki E, Watanabe S, Sato T, Miyaoka H, Azuma S, Ikegami S, Kuwahara R, Suzuki-Migishima R, et al. A single amino acid mutation in SNAP-25 induces anxiety-related behavior in mouse. PLoS One. 2011;6:e25158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Corradini I, Donzelli A, Antonucci F, Welzl H, Loos M, Martucci R, De Astis S, Pattini L, Inverardi F, Wolfer D, et al. Epileptiform Activity and Cognitive Deficits in SNAP-25+/- Mice are Normalized by Antiepileptic Drugs. Cereb Cortex. 2012 doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Johansson JU, Ericsson J, Janson J, Beraki S, Stanić D, Mandic SA, Wikström MA, Hökfelt T, Ogren SO, Rozell B, et al. An ancient duplication of exon 5 in the Snap25 gene is required for complex neuronal development/function. PLoS Genet. 2008;4:e1000278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rosahl TW, Spillane D, Missler M, Herz J, Selig DK, Wolff JR, Hammer RE, Malenka RC, Südhof TC. Essential functions of synapsins I and II in synaptic vesicle regulation. Nature. 1995;375:488–93. doi: 10.1038/375488a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Garcia CC, Blair HJ, Seager M, Coulthard A, Tennant S, Buddles M, Curtis A, Goodship JA. Identification of a mutation in synapsin I, a synaptic vesicle protein, in a family with epilepsy. J Med Genet. 2004;41:183–6. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2003.013680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hamdan FF, Piton A, Gauthier J, Lortie A, Dubeau F, Dobrzeniecka S, Spiegelman D, Noreau A, Pellerin S, Côté M, et al. De novo STXBP1 mutations in mental retardation and nonsyndromic epilepsy. Ann Neurol. 2009;65:748–53. doi: 10.1002/ana.21625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Saitsu H, Kato M, Mizuguchi T, Hamada K, Osaka H, Tohyama J, Uruno K, Kumada S, Nishiyama K, Nishimura A, et al. De novo mutations in the gene encoding STXBP1 (MUNC18-1) cause early infantile epileptic encephalopathy. Nat Genet. 2008;40:782–8. doi: 10.1038/ng.150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Otsuka M, Oguni H, Liang JS, Ikeda H, Imai K, Hirasawa K, Imai K, Tachikawa E, Shimojima K, Osawa M, et al. STXBP1 mutations cause not only Ohtahara syndrome but also West syndrome--result of Japanese cohort study. Epilepsia. 2010;51:2449–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02767.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Paciorkowski AR, Thio LL, Rosenfeld JA, Gajecka M, Gurnett CA, Kulkarni S, Chung WK, Marsh ED, Gentile M, Reggin JD, et al. Copy number variants and infantile spasms: evidence for abnormalities in ventral forebrain development and pathways of synaptic function. Eur J Hum Genet. 2011;19:1238–45. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. http://decipher.sanger.ac.uk

Articles from Rare Diseases are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES