Significance
Dengue virus (DENV) infects almost 400 million people annually and some of these infections result in life threatening disease. An incomplete understanding of pathogenesis, particularly on how non- or subneutralizing levels of antibody augments DENV infection of cells expressing Fc-gamma receptors (FcγRs), has hampered vaccine development. Here, we show that, to overcome the activating FcγR-dependent expression of type-I interferon stimulated genes (ISGs), DENV binds and activates the inhibitory receptor, leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor-B1 (LILRB1). LILRB1 signals through its immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif cytoplasmic tail to inhibit the expression of ISGs required for successful antibody-dependent DENV infection. Inhibition of DENV activation of LILRB1 could hence be a strategy for vaccine or therapeutic design.
Keywords: early innate immune response, innate immune signaling, immune evasion
Abstract
Viruses must evade the host innate defenses for replication and dengue is no exception. During secondary infection with a heterologous dengue virus (DENV) serotype, DENV is opsonized with sub- or nonneutralizing antibodies that enhance infection of monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells via the Fc-gamma receptor (FcγR), a process termed antibody-dependent enhancement of DENV infection. However, this enhancement of DENV infection is curious as cross-linking of activating FcγRs signals an early antiviral response by inducing the type-I IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs). Entry through activating FcγR would thus place DENV in an intracellular environment unfavorable for enhanced replication. Here we demonstrate that, to escape this antiviral response, antibody-opsonized DENV coligates leukocyte Ig-like receptor-B1 (LILRB1) to inhibit FcγR signaling for ISG expression. This immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif-bearing receptor recruits Src homology phosphatase-1 to dephosphorylate spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk). As Syk is a key intermediate of FcγR signaling, LILRB1 coligation resulted in reduced ISG expression for enhanced DENV replication. Our findings suggest a unique mechanism for DENV to evade an early antiviral response for enhanced infection.
Despite long-lived serotype-specific immunity upon initial infection, predicted global prevalence of dengue now surpasses World Health Organization estimates by more than threefold with 390 million cases annually (1). Furthermore, the risk of severe disease is augmented by cross-reactive or subneutralizing levels of antibody (2, 3), which opsonize dengue virus (DENV) to ligate Fc-gamma receptor (FcγR) for entry into monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells, a phenomenon known as antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of DENV infection (4, 5). The resultant greater viral burden leads to increased systemic inflammation that precipitates plasma leakage, a hallmark of dengue hemorrhagic fever (6). However, ligation of the activating FcγRs by immune complexes has been shown to induce type-I IFN stimulated genes (ISGs), independent of autocrine or paracrine IFN activity, unless the inhibitory FcγRIIB is coligated (7). We and others reported recently that coligation of FcγRIIB by DENV immune complexes requires high antibody concentration, and such coligation inhibited the entry of DENV immune complexes into monocytes (8, 9). At low antibody concentrations where ADE occurs, the inhibitory FcγRIIB is not coligated (9). Ligation of the activating FcγRs by DENV opsonized with subneutralizing levels of antibody would thus induce the expression of ISGs and hinder DENV replication (10). Here, we demonstrate that DENV employs a unique evasive mechanism by coligating LILRB1 to down-regulate the early antiviral responses triggered by activating FcγRs for ADE.
Results
ADE Differs in THP-1 Subclones.
Our work was enabled by the isolation of subclones of THP-1 cells with different phenotypes to ADE. The low rate of FcγR-mediated phagocytosis in THP-1 cells (∼5%) (9) had led us to reason that this cell line is genetically heterogeneous, either through the method in which it was derived (11) or through genetic instability resulting from aneuploidy (12). Screening of our newly isolated subclones with DiD (1, 1’-dioctadecyl-3, 3, 3′, 3′ – tetramethylindodicarbocyanine, 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate salt) labeled DENV-2 alone or opsonized with subneutralizing concentrations of humanized 3H5 monoclonal antibody (h3H5) identified two clones (labeled as THP-1.2R and THP-1.2S) that showed increased uptake of DENV immune complexes compared with parental THP-1 (Fig. 1A). Monocyte surface marker analysis indicated no significant difference in the expression of FcγRs (FcγRI, FcγRII, FcγRIII) in these subclones (SI Appendix, Fig. S1A). Expression of FcγRIIA, FcγRIIB, and FcγRIIC were similar in these subclones (SI Appendix, Fig. S1 B and C). Both subclones were also heterozygous for 131 H/R FcγRIIA polymorphism (SI Appendix, Fig. S1E). Identical HLA haplotyping confirmed that both subclones were derived from THP-1 and not the result of a contamination with another cell line (SI Appendix, Table S1).
Despite no significant differences in uptake and production of plaque titers when infected with DENV-2 only, infection under ADE conditions resulted in significantly different DENV-2 titers in THP-1.2R and THP-1.2S (Fig. 1B). Similar observations were also made with enhancing titers of convalescent serum (SI Appendix, Fig. S2A) or other DENV serotypes (SI Appendix, Fig. S2B). Furthermore, early DENV RNA replication diverged in these two subclones, where a significant difference was observed as early as 6 h postinfection (Fig. 1C). Analysis of early gene expression indicated significant up-regulation of ISGs in THP-1.2R but not THP-1.2S (Fig. 1 D and F–I). These included MX1, MX2, and viperin, which are potent inhibitors of DENV replication (10). The up-regulation of ISGs in THP-1.2R, however, was not due to h3H5 (SI Appendix, Fig. S3) and is independent of IFN-α, -β, and -γ signaling as both subclones expressed similar IFN transcript levels (Fig. 1E). As expected, addition of antibodies that blocked IFNα receptor (IFNαR) signaling (SI Appendix, Fig. S4A) did not reduce this early ISG induction in THP-1.2R following infection (SI Appendix, Fig. S4B). The possibility that THP-1.2S had impaired IFNαR-mediated signaling was also excluded, as ISGs were significantly up-regulated in response to exogenous IFN (SI Appendix, Fig. S4C). These subclones thus serve as exquisite tools to decipher the signaling requirement to overcome the early antiviral responses for successful ADE.
Early ISG Expression During ADE Is Independent of RIG-I/MDA5 Signaling.
Differences in viral entry through ADE and DENV-2–only conditions could have resulted in different intracellular antigenic load and hence resulted in differential ISG expression in the subclones. To identify the specific signaling pathway responsible for early ISG induction in THP-1.2R during ADE infection, we titrated the multiplicity of infection (MOI) for DENV-2 only that resulted in equivalent level of infection as ADE (MOI 10) to serve as an antigenically equivalent control (Fig. 2 A and B). Interestingly, lower and higher plaque titers were observed in THP-1.2R and THP-1.2S, respectively, during ADE relative to DENV-2–only (MOI 60) conditions (Fig. 2C), which corroborates the notion that THP-1.2R has reduced susceptibility to ADE. Immunofluorescence imaging showed nuclear translocation of pSTAT-1 at 3 h post ADE in THP-1.2R but not in THP-1.2S or during antigenically equivalent DENV-only infection (Fig. 2D). This early nuclear translocation of pSTAT-1 is transient as little colocalization could be observed at 6 h postinfection.
With similar intracellular antigenic load in ADE and DENV-2–only conditions, we determined whether trafficking of DENV containing-phagosomes to cellular compartments enriched with pattern recognition receptors was an explanation for ISG induction in THP-1.2R. This was not the case as reduced expression of adaptor molecules [mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein (MAVS) and IFN regulatory factor 3 (IRF3)] of retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I)/melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (MDA5) resulted in significantly increased early DENV replication under DENV-2–only but not ADE conditions (Fig. 2E). Reduced TIR-domain containing adapter-inducing IFN β (TRIF) did not result in significant change in DENV replication under either condition (Fig. 2E). Collectively, these results indicate that the early induction of ISG in THP-1.2R is unique to infection under ADE condition and is not mediated by RIG-I/MDA5–dependent type-I IFN expression.
Early ISG Induction Is Mediated by Activating FcγR.
The independence of ISG expression from RIG-I/MDA5–mediated signaling thus suggests that activating FcγR signaling (7) through spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk) activation (13) is critical in THP-1.2R. We thus quantified Syk activation by Western blot with densitometric measurements. Significant difference in Syk phosphorylation was observed as early as 10 min postinfection under ADE but not DENV-2–only conditions in THP-1.2R (Fig. 3A). In contrast, no significant difference in Syk phosphorylation was observed under DENV-2–only and ADE conditions in THP-1.2S. Pretreatment of THP-1.2R with piceatannol, a Syk-selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor resulted in greater reduction of ISG expression under ADE conditions (Fig. 3B) and a correspondingly greater increase in DENV replication (Fig. 3C) compared with DENV-2 only. Increase in DENV replication was also greater in THP-1.2R than THP-1.2S. These findings suggest that early ISG expression in THP-1.2R is conditioned upon activating FcγR signaling through phosphorylated Syk (7).
Coligation of LILRB1 Inhibits ISG Induction.
As activating FcγR signals through immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM), we postulated that DENV coligates an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif (ITIM)-bearing receptor to inhibit Syk activation (14) in THP-1.2S. Examination of the gene expression data identified two such possible receptors. LILRB1 (also known as CD85j or Ig-like transcript-2) and LILRB4 were up-regulated preinfection in THP-1.2S relative to THP-1.2R (SI Appendix, Fig. S5A). Flow cytometry analysis, however, showed that only LILRB1 (Fig. 3D and SI Appendix, Fig. S5B) displayed higher surface expression on THP-1.2S. Because one of the effects of ITIM phosphorylation is the recruitment and phosphorylation of SHP-1 (15, 16), we measured phosphorylated SHP-1 in the two subclones. Higher pSHP-1 levels were found in THP-1.2S than THP-1.2R under ADE conditions (Fig. 3 E and F), suggesting that pSHP-1 dephosphorylated Syk in THP-1.2S.
If LILRB1 is necessary for ADE, then antibody-opsonized dengue should coligate LILRB1. Indeed, all four DENV serotypes bind to LILRB1, more strongly with whole virus than with E protein ectodomain (Fig. 4A and SI Appendix, Fig. S6A), suggesting that LILRB1 binds to a quaternary structure-dependent epitope. Furthermore, the addition of soluble extracellular domain of LILRB1 (SI Appendix, Fig. S6B) successfully competed with native LILRB1 on THP-1.2S to reduce ADE but not DENV-2–only infection in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4B). As expected, soluble LILRB1 ectodomain did not alter the rate of viral entry as this receptor functions by modulating the antiviral state of the cell rather than increasing DENV entry (SI Appendix, Fig. S6 C and D). Likewise, reduced LILRB1 expression in THP-1.2S resulted in reduced DENV replication under ADE conditions (Fig. 4C), without altering the rate of viral entry (SI Appendix, Fig. S6E). The lack of any change in DENV replication with FcγRIIB expression also reinforces the notion that subneutralizing levels of antibody are insufficient to aggregate DENV to coligate FcγRIIB (9). Similar observations were made with knockdown of LILRB1 expression in another unrelated human myelogenous leukemia cell line, K562 (SI Appendix, Fig. S7).
Conversely, overexpression of LILRB1 in THP-1.2R resulted in increased DENV replication under ADE conditions (Fig. 4D). As a control, we also overexpressed LILRB4, but this did not result in increased DENV replication. Critically, mutation of the four tyrosine residues in the ITIM tail to phenylalanine (SI Appendix, Fig. S8) abrogated the increased DENV replication (Fig. 4D). Taken collectively, these findings indicate that DENV coligates LILRB1 to inhibit FcγR-activated early ISG expression for ADE.
The mechanistic requirement for LILRB1 in ADE suggests that interfering with this pathway would abrogate ADE in primary monocytes. We studied CD14hiCD16− inflammatory monocytes that express both FcγRs and LILRB1 (SI Appendix, Fig. S9 A and B), which form the majority of the circulating monocytes (17). Indeed, pretreatment with sodium stibogluconate, a SHP-1 inhibitor resulted in a dose-dependent reduction in DENV-2 replication under ADE conditions (Fig. 4E), with no significant reduction in primary monocyte cytotoxicity (SI Appendix, Fig. S9C). Likewise, plaque titers following ADE infection of the other 3 DENV serotypes on primary monocytes obtained from different healthy donors were significantly lower in sodium stibogluconate treated cells compared with untreated cells (Fig. 4F). Pretreatment of primary monocytes derived from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from 12 different healthy human volunteers with anti-LILRB1 antibodies also resulted in significantly reduced DENV replication compared with isotype antibodies (Fig. 4G).
Discussion
The ADE hypothesis has been widely used to explain the epidemiological association between secondary DENV infection and severe dengue (18, 19). However, entry through the activating FcγR pathway would pose no replicative benefit to DENV unless it is able to overcome the ITAM–Syk–STAT-1 signaling axis that leads to ISG induction (7, 13). The findings here thus indicate that coligation of LILRB1 is a critical first step for successful antibody-dependent DENV infection (SI Appendix, Fig. S10).
LILRB1 is expressed on monocytes, dendritic cells, and subsets of T and NK cells. Its natural function is to activate negative feedback mechanisms upon binding to major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) molecules (20). Consequently, it is conceivable that viruses exploit this pathway to create an intracellular environment more favorable for replication. Besides dengue, human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) also binds LILRB1 through the glycoprotein UL-18 to trigger an inhibitory signaling pathway that limits antiviral effector functions (21, 22). Furthermore, increased LILRB1 expression in CD8+ effector T-cells is associated with reduced cytokine secretion and cytotoxicity in persistent HCMV and Epstein–Barr virus infections (22, 23). It would be interesting to test if LILRB1-mediated suppression of immune signaling is also exploited by other viruses.
Coligation of LILRB1 by DENV during antibody-dependent infection suggests that LILRB1 polymorphism may influence outcome of infection. Previous studies have shown that this gene is highly polymorphic (24) and can be alternatively spliced (25). However, a recent genome-wide association study did not reveal a significant association between LILRB1 and dengue shock syndrome (26); this is not surprising because, although LILRB1 activation is critical for initial replication with FcγR-mediated entry, multiple other host and viral factors contribute to eventual disease outcome.
Our findings also suggest that generation of antibodies to quaternary structure-dependent epitopes on DENV that block LILRB1 interaction can reduce ADE. That heterotypic antibodies can enhance dengue infection in FcγR-bearing cells represents a safety concern in the development of a dengue vaccine. Hence, a vaccine that can generate high-titer antibody that binds the quaternary structure-dependent epitopes on DENV to prevent LILRB1 ligation could reduce the risk of vaccine-induced ADE. Further studies would be needed to clarify this, although care must be taken in selecting a suitable in vivo model as the LILRB1 gene is deleted in laboratory strains of mice (27).
In conclusion, DENV coligates LILRB1 to down-regulate the activating FcγR-mediated early ISG expression for successful antibody-dependent infection.
Materials and Methods
Cells.
THP-1.2R and THP-1.2S were subcloned from THP-1 by limiting dilution. Primary monocytes were isolated from healthy donors and cultured as described (9).
Viruses.
DENV-1 (06K2402DK1), DENV-3 (05K863DK1), and DENV-4 (06K2270DK1) are clinical isolates from the EDEN study (28). DENV-2 (ST) is a clinical isolate from the Singapore General Hospital.
Virus Infection.
Endotoxin-free (LAL Chromogenic Endotoxin Quantitation kit, Pierce) 3H5 and 4G2 chimeric human/mouse IgG1 antibodies were constructed as described (29). DENV was incubated with media, antibodies, or serum for 1h at 37 °C before adding to cells at indicated MOI. Uptake was assessed using DiD and Alexa 488-labeled DENV as described (9, 30). For drug assays, cells were pretreated with piceatannol (Sigma-Aldrich) or sodium stibogluconate (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) 6 h before infection. Cell viability was assessed using CellTiter 96 AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay (MTS, Promega) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Subsequently, virus replication was assessed using quantitative PCR at indicated time points and plaque assay at 72 h postinfection. Protein and protein phosphorylation levels were assessed using Western blots and analyzed with ImageJ.
Microarray Analysis.
Following RNA extraction, microarray was performed at the Duke-NUS Genome Biology Core Facility. cRNAs were hybridized to Illumina Human HT-12 v4 Beadchips, according to manufacturer’s instructions. Data analysis was performed using Partek software and normalized against GAPDH.
Competition with Soluble LILRB1 Ectodomain.
The extracellular portion of LILRB1 was cloned into pCMV-XL5 (Origene) and transfected into HEK293T cells for protein expression. The expressed proteins were then purified and incubated with DENV-2 or h3H5-opsonized DENV-2 for 1 h at 37 °C before adding to THP-1.2S.
siRNA Transfection and Overexpression.
siRNA transfections and overexpression were performed as described (9). siRNA targeting FcγRIIB (Qiagen), LILRB1, MAVS, IRF3, and TRIF (SABio) were used, and overexpression studies were performed with either empty plasmid, plasmid encoding LILRB1 or tyrosine mutant LILRB1, or LILRB4.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Soman Abraham for his constructive review of this work and Mei Fong Chan and Kenneth Goh for their technical assistance. This work was supported by the Singapore National Research Foundation under its Clinician-Scientist Award administered by the National Medical Research Council.
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
See Commentary on page 2404.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1317454111/-/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.Bhatt S, et al. The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature. 2013;496(7446):504–507. doi: 10.1038/nature12060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Halstead SB, O’Rourke EJ. Dengue viruses and mononuclear phagocytes. I. Infection enhancement by non-neutralizing antibody. J Exp Med. 1977;146(1):201–217. doi: 10.1084/jem.146.1.201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Simmons CP, et al. Maternal antibody and viral factors in the pathogenesis of dengue virus in infants. J Infect Dis. 2007;196(3):416–424. doi: 10.1086/519170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Halstead SB. Pathogenesis of dengue: Challenges to molecular biology. Science. 1988;239(4839):476–481. doi: 10.1126/science.3277268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Halstead SB, O’Rourke EJ. Antibody-enhanced dengue virus infection in primate leukocytes. Nature. 1977;265(5596):739–741. doi: 10.1038/265739a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Libraty DH, et al. Differing influences of virus burden and immune activation on disease severity in secondary dengue-3 virus infections. J Infect Dis. 2002;185(9):1213–1221. doi: 10.1086/340365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dhodapkar KM, et al. Selective blockade of the inhibitory Fcgamma receptor (FcgammaRIIB) in human dendritic cells and monocytes induces a type I interferon response program. J Exp Med. 2007;204(6):1359–1369. doi: 10.1084/jem.20062545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Boonnak K, Slike BM, Donofrio GC, Marovich MA. Human FcγRII cytoplasmic domains differentially influence antibody-mediated dengue virus infection. J Immunol. 2013;190(11):5659–5665. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1203052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chan KR, et al. Ligation of Fc gamma receptor IIB inhibits antibody-dependent enhancement of dengue virus infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(30):12479–12484. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1106568108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jiang D, et al. Identification of five interferon-induced cellular proteins that inhibit west nile virus and dengue virus infections. J Virol. 2010;84(16):8332–8341. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02199-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tsuchiya S, et al. Establishment and characterization of a human acute monocytic leukemia cell line (THP-1) Int J Cancer. 1980;26(2):171–176. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910260208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sheltzer JM, et al. Aneuploidy drives genomic instability in yeast. Science. 2011;333(6045):1026–1030. doi: 10.1126/science.1206412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tassiulas I, et al. Amplification of IFN-alpha-induced STAT1 activation and inflammatory function by Syk and ITAM-containing adaptors. Nat Immunol. 2004;5(11):1181–1189. doi: 10.1038/ni1126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Steevels TA, Meyaard L. Immune inhibitory receptors: Essential regulators of phagocyte function. Eur J Immunol. 2011;41(3):575–587. doi: 10.1002/eji.201041179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Fanger NA, et al. The MHC class I binding proteins LIR-1 and LIR-2 inhibit Fc receptor-mediated signaling in monocytes. Eur J Immunol. 1998;28(11):3423–3434. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199811)28:11<3423::AID-IMMU3423>3.0.CO;2-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Scharenberg AM, Kinet JP. The emerging field of receptor-mediated inhibitory signaling: SHP or SHIP? Cell. 1996;87(6):961–964. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81790-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Passlick B, Flieger D, Ziegler-Heitbrock HW. Identification and characterization of a novel monocyte subpopulation in human peripheral blood. Blood. 1989;74(7):2527–2534. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Halstead SB, Mahalingam S, Marovich MA, Ubol S, Mosser DM. Intrinsic antibody-dependent enhancement of microbial infection in macrophages: Disease regulation by immune complexes. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10(10):712–722. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70166-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Simmons CP, Farrar JJ, Nguyen V, Wills B. Dengue. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(15):1423–1432. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1110265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Colonna M, et al. A common inhibitory receptor for major histocompatibility complex class I molecules on human lymphoid and myelomonocytic cells. J Exp Med. 1997;186(11):1809–1818. doi: 10.1084/jem.186.11.1809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yang Z, Bjorkman PJ. Structure of UL18, a peptide-binding viral MHC mimic, bound to a host inhibitory receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(29):10095–10100. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804551105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cosman D, et al. A novel immunoglobulin superfamily receptor for cellular and viral MHC class I molecules. Immunity. 1997;7(2):273–282. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80529-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Poon K, Montamat-Sicotte D, Cumberbatch N, McMichael AJ, Callan MF. Expression of leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptors and natural killer receptors on virus-specific CD8+ T cells during the evolution of Epstein-Barr virus-specific immune responses in vivo. Viral Immunol. 2005;18(3):513–522. doi: 10.1089/vim.2005.18.513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kuroki K, et al. Extensive polymorphisms of LILRB1 (ILT2, LIR1) and their association with HLA-DRB1 shared epitope negative rheumatoid arthritis. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14(16):2469–2480. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Jones DC, et al. Alternative mRNA splicing creates transcripts encoding soluble proteins from most LILR genes. Eur J Immunol. 2009;39(11):3195–3206. doi: 10.1002/eji.200839080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Khor CC, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies susceptibility loci for dengue shock syndrome at MICB and PLCE1. Nat Genet. 2011;43(11):1139–1141. doi: 10.1038/ng.960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kubagawa H, Burrows PD, Cooper MD. A novel pair of immunoglobulin-like receptors expressed by B cells and myeloid cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94(10):5261–5266. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.10.5261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Low JG, et al. Early Dengue infection and outcome study (EDEN) - study design and preliminary findings. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2006;35(11):783–789. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hanson BJ, et al. Passive immunoprophylaxis and therapy with humanized monoclonal antibody specific for influenza A H5 hemagglutinin in mice. Respir Res. 2006;7:126. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-7-126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zhang SL, Tan HC, Hanson BJ, Ooi EE. A simple method for Alexa Fluor dye labelling of dengue virus. J Virol Methods. 2010;167(2):172–177. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2010.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.