Summary
We recently identified a gene (FTN_0818) required for Francisella virulence that seemed likely involved in biotin metabolism. However, the molecular function of this virulence determinant was unclear. Here we show that this protein named BioJ is the enzyme of the biotin biosynthesis pathway that determines the chain length of the biotin valeryl side chain. Expression of bioJ allows growth of an E. coli bioH strain on biotin-free medium, indicating functional equivalence of BioJ to the paradigm pimeloyl-ACP methyl ester carboxyl-esterase, BioH. BioJ was purified to homogeneity, shown to be monomeric and capable of hydrolysis of its physiological substrate methyl pimeloyl-ACP to pimeloyl-ACP, the precursor required to begin formation of the fused heterocyclic rings of biotin. Phylogenetic analyses confirmed that distinct from BioH, BioJ represents a novel sub-clade of the α/β-hydrolase family. Structure-guided mapping combined with site-directed mutagenesis revealed that the BioJ catalytic triad consists of Ser151, Asp248 and His278, all of which are essential for activity and virulence. The biotin synthesis pathway was reconstituted in vitro and the physiological role of BioJ directly assayed. To the best of our knowledge, these data represent further evidence linking biotin synthesis to bacterial virulence.
Keywords: Francisella, biotin, biotin synthesis, BioJ, nutritional virulence factor
Introduction
Tularemia (also called rabbit fever, http://www.cdc.gov/tularemia) is a serious zoonotic disease that is featured epidemiologically with sporadic/endemic cases in North America and parts of Europe and Asia (Jones et al., 2012a, Celli & Zahrt, 2013). Francisella tularensis (F. tularensis), a Gram-negative intracellular pathogen, has been identified as the causative agent of this plague-like disease (Jones et al., 2012a). Although numerous mammals such as squirrels and rabbits are susceptible to this bacterial pathogen, none of these acts as a reservoir. Instead, it seems likely that freshwater amoebae living therein may be the true reservoir of this bacterium (Jones et al., 2012a, Celli & Zahrt, 2013). Human infection by Francisella is mainly acquired through the arthropod vectors (i.e., tick and deer fly bites) and/or zoonotic transmission (e.g., close contact with diseased animals) (Jones et al., 2012a). No person-to-person transmission has been recorded thus far. The three known subspecies (biovars) of the genus Francisella include F. tularensis, F. novicida, and F. philomiragia, respectively (Weiss et al., 2007, Celli & Zahrt, 2013). F. tularensis is the most virulent of these bacteria and that most frequently isolated from infected humans. Although F. novicida, and F. philomiragia can result in debilitating febrile illness in immunocompromised individuals, they rarely cause illness in immuno-competent persons suggesting that they are much less virulent (Weiss et al., 2007). F. novicida, a BSL-2 pathogen serves as an excellent surrogate model to explore Francisella pathogenesis and host-pathogen interactions (Celli & Zahrt, 2013). The F. novicida genome is >98% identical to that of the BSL- 3 category A pathogen, F. tularensis and thus shares many of the same virulence genes. Moreover, F. novicida can cause lethal infections in mice.
Francisella has evolved multiple strategies to successfully complete its intracellular infection life cycle (Jones et al., 2012a). Before its entry into host cells, it relies on an unusual lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and a protective capsule to resist extra-cellular host defense systems such as complement (Rus et al., 2005), antibodies (Crane et al., 2009, Geier & Celli, 2011) and antibacterial peptides (Cederlund et al., 2011). After uptake by macrophages, Francisella subverts innate immune recognition receptors such as Toll-like receptors (Kawai & Akira, 2010, Wilson et al., 2009) to prevent inflammatory signaling (Jones et al., 2012b, Sampson et al., 2013) (reviewed in (Jones et al., 2012a)). Francisella then rapidly escapes from the Francisella-containing phagosome into the cytosol where it can proliferate (McCaffrey et al., 2010, Ray et al., 2009). The Francisella pathogenicity island plays a critical role in bacterial pathogenesis and encodes a type VI-like secretion system to efficiently deliver virulence determinants into host cells (Nano et al., 2004, Santic et al., 2007, Barker et al., 2009). Another important aspect is the nutritional tug-of-war between Francisella and its host. Bacterial acquisition of the limited nutrients such as iron (Weinberg, 1974, Sen et al., 2010) and cysteine (Alkhuder et al., 2009) inside host cells often determines successful infection. Very recently, the metabolite biotin (vitamin B7 or H) that normally functions as a micronutrient was suggested to be correlated with Francisella virulence (Napier et al., 2012). However, the biochemical/metabolic mechanism used by Francisella to synthesize biotin and thereby facilitate its infectivity remained unknown. A distantly related scenario is seen in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections where de novo biotin synthesis is required for the persistence required to cause chronic infections (Woong Park et al., 2011).
Biotin is an important enzyme cofactor that acts as a covalently-bound prosthetic group) (Beckett, 2007, Beckett, 2009). Biotin is essential in all domains of life because it plays critical roles in central metabolic processes involving carboxylation, decarboxylation and transcarboxylation (Attwood & Wallace, 2002, Knowles, 1989). Although this cofactor was discovered over 70 years ago, our understanding of its diversified biosynthetic routes still remain fragmentary (Lin et al., 2010, Shapiro et al., 2012). The later steps of the pathway BioF, BioA, BioD and BioB are highly conserved and catalyze assembly of the fused heterocyclic rings of biotin (Beckett, 2007, Lin & Cronan, 2010). The earlier steps in which the precursor pimelate moiety is synthesized remained a long-standing puzzle until a recent report by Lin and coworkers (Lin et al., 2010) demonstrated that E. coli synthesizes by use of a modified type II fatty acid synthesis pathway (FAS II) (Cronan & Lin, 2010, Lin & Cronan, 2010, Lin et al., 2010). To the best of our knowledge, the BioC-BioH pathway of E. coli represents the first experimentally-verified paradigm for synthesis of the biotin precursor pimeloyl-acyl carrier protein (ACP) (Lin et al., 2010). The BioC enzyme functions as an O-methyltransferase that catalyzes O-esterification of the free carboxyl group of malonyl-ACP (Fig. 1C) to generate malonyl-ACP methyl ester which is used as a primer for FAS II in place of the usual acetyl-thioester (Lin & Cronan, 2012). After completion of the pimelate chain, the methyl group must be removed to prevent further elongation to physiologically useless products and this “gatekeeper” function is the property of BioH (Fig. 4) (Agarwal et al., 2012, Shapiro et al., 2012). Unlike E. coli (Lin et al., 2010) analyses of the extant bacterial genomes showed that bioH is absent in many bioC-containing bacteria, although bioC genes are widely-distributed (Rodionov et al., 2002). It therefore seems likely that bacteria have evolved diverse mechanisms to make pimelate. Francisella (http://www.francisella.org) (Larsson et al., 2005, Rohmer et al., 2007) encodes BioC in its biotin operon but no gene encoding a bioH homologue is present in the operon or genome raising the possibility that a non-orthologous protein catalyzes cleavage of the methyl group of methyl pimeloyl-ACP. Given that disruption or deletion of the FTN_0818 gene of F. novicida and of the homologous genes of F. tularensis and F. holarctica engenders a biotin requirement for escape of the bacteria from the phagosome (Su et al., 2007, Llewellyn et al., 2011, Napier et al., 2012), we hypothesized that the protein encoded by FTN_0818 might provide the BioH-like activity needed to complete the Francisella biotin synthesis pathway. We report that this is the case and provide the first biochemical mechanism for the synthesis of biotin as a Francisella nutritional virulence factor..
Fig. 1.
Genetic organization of biotin synthesis-related genes and working model for the Francisella biotin biosynthesis pathway
A. Comparison of the Francisella biotin operon genome neighborhood to that of E. coli. Note that the two Francisella genomes are inverted due to opposite ORF numbering systems
B. Scheme of the proposed Francisella biotin synthesis pathway
Fig. 4.
Francisella BioJ is a functional carboxylesterase
A. Schematic diagram of the enzymatic reaction catalyzed by Francisella BioJ
B. Enzymatic assays for Francisella BioJ hydrolysis of pimeloyl-ACP methyl ester to pimeloyl-ACP
The enzymatic reactions (10 μl total volume) were performed at 37°C and contained 150 μM pimeloyl-ACP methyl ester as substrate. The reaction mixtures were analyzed by 20% PAGE containing 2.5 M urea. The BioJ-reaction times (right-hand six lanes of Panel B) were 2, 5, 10, 15, 20 and 30 minutes, respectively. CK denotes a reaction containing all components except BioJ. . The triangle over the right-hand seven lanes of the bottom panel represents BioJ levels in a inverse dilution series (0.034, 0.068, 0.17, 0.34, 0.7, 1.7 and 3.4 pmol).
C. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectroscopic analysis of the BioJ reaction
Upon overexpression of ACP in E. coli three forms of the protein are found due to titration of the deformylase and methionine amino peptidase that process the amino termini of nascent proteins. Form 1 is the form isolated when expression is from the chromosomal acpP gene. Abbreviations: Met, methionine; Me, methyl ester.
D. Substrate specificity of BioJ
The minus signs denote no addition of BioJ enzyme whereas the plus signs denote addition of the protein.
Results
Francisella species lack the paradigm BioH gatekeeper enzyme of biotin biosynthesis
Given the fact that Francisella species have small genomes (1.9~2.1 Mb), less that half that of E. coli (~4.6 Mb), it is reasonable that these bacteria have evolved strategies to efficiently utilize their limited genetic information. One strategy is the organization of the metabolism-related genes into a cluster (Fig. 1A). In the paradigm organism, E. coli, most but not all biotin biosynthetic genes are clustered on the chromosome (Fig. 1A). The bioH gene is encoded at a site far removed from the bioBFCDA bidirectional operon as is the birA gene that encodes the bifunctional biotin protein ligase/biotin operon repressor (Fig. 1A). In contrast, the annotated biotin metabolic loci of all Francisella species are present in a similar bioBFCDA operon adjacent to birA (Fig. 1A). It seems likely that Francisella BirA regulates bioBFCDA by a mode similar to that of E. coli because a putative conserved BirA binding site is located in the intergenic region between bioB and bioA. Intriguingly, the bioH homologue that encodes the gatekeeper enzyme of the biotin synthetic pathway seemed to be missing in all the examined Francisella species (Fig. 1A and B), indicating functional replacement by an unknown novel enzyme. The F. novicida FTN_0818 and F. philomiragia Fphi_1796 genes are located adjacent to the respective bioBFCD/A operons consistent with their implication in biotin metabolism, although the genes are separated from bioA by a small gene unique to Francisella that encodes a protein of unknown function (Fig. 1A). Note that the sequence of the F. philomiragia protein is 86% identical to that of the Francisella tularensis subsp. Tularensis protein (Fig. 2S).
BioJ, a new biotin biosynthesis gatekeeping enzyme
To test if expression of the Fphi_1796 gene of F. philomiragia could provide the missing biotin biosynthesis gatekeeping enzyme we assayed complementation of an E. coli ΔbioH biotin auxotrophic strain. A derivative of arabinose inducible vector pBAD322 carrying Fphi_1796 called pFph was transformed into the ΔbioH strain and the transformants were streaked on biotin-free M9 minimal media that contained either varying levels of arabinose, the inducer of the araBAD promoter or 0.2% glycerol (for basal expression) as sole carbon source. In the presence of 4 nM biotin the strains that carried either pFphi or the empty vector pBAD322 both grew well whereas neither strain grew on plates lacking both biotin and arabinose (Fig. 2A). As expected, plasmid-borne expression of Fphi_1796 allowed good growth of the ΔbioH strain on arabinose containing plates that lacked biotin but Fig. 2A) whereas the empty vector failed to support detectable growth (Fig. 2A). The growth response required induction; no growth was seen with glycerol as sole carbon source. Similar results were obtained in liquid media (Fig. 2B). Consistent with the protein encoded by the Fphi_1796 gene acting as a BioH paralogue, its expression failed to allow growth of an E. coli ΔbioH ΔbioC strain (Fig. S1), Given that Fphi_1796 and E. coli BioH lack sufficient sequence similarity for alignment we have designated Fphi_1796 as bioJ.
Fig. 2.
Expression of Francisella philomiragia bioJ (Fphi_1796) complements growth of an E. coli ΔbioH strain
A. Expression of Francisella philomiragia bioJ (Fphi_1796) allows growth of the E. coli ΔbioH strain on biotin-free medium
B. Growth curves of the ΔbioH strain with various expression levels of plasmid-borne bioJ (Fphi_1796). The growth curves were automatically plotted using a Bioscreen C instrument. The E. coli ΔbioH strain was STL24 (Table S1). Designations: Vec, empty vector pBAD322; Fphi, F. philomiragia bioJ ; Ara, arabinose. Glycerol was the carbon source in the absence of arabinose.
Given its marked divergence from BioH we wished to characterize the enzymatic mechanism of BioJ. A hexahistidine tagged version of BioJ was expressed at high levels in E. coli and purified to homogeneity by Ni2+-chelate chromatography (Fig. 3A). Mass spectrometic analysis of the peptides of a tryptic digest of the purified protein validated the identity of the protein. Size exclusion chromatography showed that BioJ had the elution properties of a monomeric protein and its monomeric nature was confirmed by chemical cross-linking (Fig. 3A). Monomeric structure is typical of α,β hydrolases (Heikinheimo et al., 1999, Jochens et al., 2011) and was previously seen with BioH and BioG (Shapiro et al., 2012).
Fig. 3.
Characterization and verification of Francisella BioJ
A. Size exclusion chromatography profile of purified BioJ
The separation was conducted using a Superdex 75 column eluted at 0.46 ml/min. The insert gel is a gradient SDS-PAGE (4-20%) analysis of BioJ collected from the peak fractions. The molecular weights of the calibration proteins kit (Biorad) are shown by the ruler at the top. The standard proteins were bovine serum albumin (67 kDa), ovalbumin (43 kDa), ribonuclease A (13.7 kDa), aprotinin (6.5 kDa) and vitamin B12 (1.35 kDa), respectively. Chemical cross-linking analyses of fatty acid metabolism FadR, a protein of known dimeric structure (B) and BioJ (C). FadR provides a control for the efficacy of cross-linking. Ethylene glycol bis-succinimidylsuccinate was the cross-linker. M: Molecular weight.
D. MS identification of the purified BioJ protein
The tryptic peptides that match the BioJ sequence are given in bold and underlined type.
We tested the ability of to BioJ convert pimeloyl-ACP methyl ester, the physiological BioH substrate, to pimeloyl-ACP using a conformationally sensitive electrophoretic mobility shift assay (Fig. 4A). Pimeloyl-ACP migrates more slowly than the substrate, pimeloyl-ACP methyl ester because the free carboxyl group destabilzes ACP structure and thereby increases the effective radius of the protein (Lin et al., 2010, Shapiro et al., 2012). BioJ catalyzed hydrolysis of the methyl ester bond of pimeloyl-ACP methyl ester proceeded rapidly and could proceed to completion (Fig. 4B). Mass spectrometry of the reaction mixtures showed conversion of pimeloyl-ACP methyl ester to species smaller by 14-15.7 amu indicating loss of a methyl group and formation of pimeloyl-ACP (Fig. 4C). Hence, BioJ is a member of the carboxylesterase family with BioH-like activity. BioH is a rather promiscuous esterase and BioJ shares this property. BioJ cleaved two non-physiological substrates, adipoyl-ACP methyl ester; and suberyl-ACP methyl ester, having dicarboxylic acid moietes of C6 and C8, respectively (Fig. 4D). However, BioJ was unable to cleave malonyl-ACP methyl ester, the first dedicated intermediate of the biotin synthetic pathway (Fig. 4D).
Functional mapping of a catalytic triad required for BioJ activity
As a representative member of α, β-hydrolases (Sanishvili et al., 2003), E. coli BioH features a conserved catalytic Ser82-Asp207-His235 triad (Fig. 5A), Modeling of the BioJ sequence on the E. coli BioH structure gave a putative catalytic triad (Fig. 5A) that seemed to share an almost identical 3D configuration with BioH (not shown) although the neighboring residues were markedly different (Fig. 5A). The predicted catalytic triad consisted of S151, D248 and H278, (Fig. 5A). To test function of the putative triad we constructed genes encding three mutant BioJ proteins, S151A, D248A and H278A and purified the proteins together with the wild type protein (Fig. S3). In contrast to the wild type BioJ protein (Fig. 5B) all three mutant enzymes failed to cleave pimeloyl-ACP methyl ester (Fig. 5C-E). Some hydrolysis activity was detected when excess BioJ S248A mutant enzyme (>6.8 pmol) was used (not shown). However, we believe that this result is not physiologically relevant given the high concentration of the enzyme required. The significance of the amino acid residues of the predicted catalytic triad was also verified in vivo by construction of a series of ΔbioH strains carrying a plasmid encoding BioJ (either the wild type or one of the three mutant proteins) and tested their abilities to grow on biotin-free plates (Fig. 5F). The strain expressing wild type BioJ gave robust growth even when the arabinose inducer levels was as low as 0.05% whereas no growth was seen for the strain carrying the empty vector (Fig. 5F). Expression of all three mutant BioJ proteins failed to allow growth of the ΔbioH strain indicating that the hydrolysis seen with excess BioJ S248A in vitro was not physiologically relevant.
Fig. 5. Identification of a catalytic Ser-Asp-His triad motif required for BioJ function.
A. Comparison of the putative active site of BioJ with the known catalytic residues of BioH. The key residues are in purple. S. marcescens: Serratia marcescens
Enzymatic assays of BioJ (Panel B) and the single mutant S151A (Panel C), D248A (Panel D) and H278A proteins (Panel E) by the conformationally-sensitive electrophoretic mobility shift assay.
Minus denotes no addition of BioJ (or a mutant protein) whereas the triangle on the right hand represents the protein levels in a inverse dilution series (0.034, 0.068, 0.17, 0.34, 0.7, 1.7, 3.4 pmol). The enzymatic reaction (10 μl total volume) contained 150 μM methyl pimeloyl-ACP. The reaction mixture was separated using 20% PAGE containing 2.5 M urea.
F. In vivo functional analyses of the triad residue BioJ mutant proteins (S151A, D248A & H278A)
The plates of were incubated at 37 °C for ~20 h after streaking. The host strain was the E. coli ΔbioH strain STL24. Designations: Ara, arabinose; Fphi, F. philomiragia bioJ ; Vec, medium copy arabinose-inducible plasmid pBAD322.
The physiological role of BioJ in dethiobiotin synthesis
Although the lines of evidence given above indicated clearly that BioJ activity is required for conversion of the pimeloyl methyl ester moiety to the final product biotin, a further test was its ability to function in the in vitro system previously developed (Lin et al., 2010) to assay the overall biotin synthesis pathway. Note that the penultimate intermediate, dethiobiotin (DTB) is assayed rather than biotin in order to avoid the complication of the extremely labile the BioB enzyme that catalyzes the last step of the pathway. Crude extracts of a ΔbioH strain were used and synthesis of DTB was bioassayed using the strain ER90 (ΔbioF bioC bioD) (Lin et al., 2010, Feng et al., 2013a, Feng et al., 2013b). Growth of the biotin auxotroph strain ER90 is visualized by deposition of a red formazan deposit (del Campillo-Campbell et al., 1979) (Fig. 6). Biotin or DTB addition to the paper disk allowed growth of the indicator strain ER90 and 1-2 pmol could be detected (Fig. 6A). Addition of pimeloyl-ACP methyl ester to crude extracts prepared from the ΔbioH mutant strain (0.2-0.3 mg total protein) gave no detectable growth of the assay strain (Fig. 6B) whereas good growth was seen upon addition of purified BioJ to the reactions (Fig. 6C) which indicated DTB synthesis. In contrast, incubations containing any of the mutant BioJ proteins failed to allow ER90 growth (Fig. 6D). These results clearly illustrated the physiological role of BioJ in bacterial DTB biosynthesis.
Fig. 6.

Bioassay of BioJ function in the overall biotin synthesis pathway
A. Both biotin and dethiobiotin (DTB) support growth of the biotin auxotrophic strain ER90 on biotin-free minimal medium
B. Evidence for the absence of biotin in cell extracts prepared from the E. coli ΔbioH strain
Strain STL24 (ΔbioH) (Lin et al., 2010) was used to prepare cell extracts and the biotin indicator strain was ER90 (ΔbioF bioC bioD). Either biotin or DTB as positive control or the cell extract (10 mg/ml) was spotted on the paper disk as described (Lin et al., 2010). The bioassay was performed using strain ER90. The plates were kept at 30°C for ~20 h.
The red formazan deposit formed by reduction of the tetrazolium indicator denotes growth of the biotin auxotrophic strain ER90 supported by either biotin or DTB.
C. Scheme of the in vitro DTB synthesis system
D. Restoration of DTB synthesis to the ΔbioH extract by addition of pimeloyl-ACP methyl ester and BioJ
Either the purified wild type BioJ protein or the mutant BioJ versions (S151A, D248A and H278A) was added to 20 μg/ml (0.5 μM). The reaction on the upper left quadrant contained nearly all the components required for DTB synthesis with the exception of BioJ (or its mutant) enzyme whereas samples spotted on the upper right quadrant lacked cell extract, only contained both the wild type and mutant BioJ proteins. The reactions of the lower left quadrant contained all the components requied for DTB synthesis. Designations: plus, addition of BioJ protein (or its mutants); minus: no addition of BioJ protein (or its mutants) or cell extracts.
BioJ activity is required for F. novicida viability
The physiological relevance of BioJ was tested using mutants of F. novicida in which an alanine substitution was made for the two putative catalytic triad residues other than the previously tested S151A mutation (Napier et al., 2012). Growth of the new strains was tested in nutrient-limiting CHB and loss of any of the three triad residues clearly resulted in a severe growth defect relative to wild-type F. novicida (Fig. 7) as previously reported for the S151A strain (Napier et al., 2012). Addition of either biotin (Fig. 7A) or pimelate (Fig. 7B) restored growth defect of all three catalytic residue point mutant strains. These results demonstrate the physiological importance of each of the BioJ Ser-Asp-His triad residues.
Fig. 7.
The BioJ Ser-Asp-His catalytic triad is essential for growth of F. novicida in minimal media and for efficient replication in macrophages (and systemic survival in mice
The BioJ catalytic triad is required for growth of F. novicida in minimal medium, and can be alleviated by the addition of biotin (A) or pimelate (B). Wild-type strain U122 of F. novicida and the three catalytic point mutants of BioJ (S151A, D248A and H278A) are grown in Chamberlain’s medium (CHB) with/without biotin or pimelate. The OD600 was measured every hour.
C. The catalytic triad of BioJ is required for replication in macrophages lacking exogenous biotin.
D-G. The BioJ catalytic triad residues are required for systemic survival in mice. Mice were infected sub-cutaneously with a 1:1 mixture of wild-type strain 122 of Francisella with ΔbioJ (D), S151A (E), D248A (F) or H278A (G). At 48 h post infection the, spleens and livers were harvested to quantify bacterial levels, and the competitive index (CI) was calculated. Statistical analysis was described previously (Weiss, et al., 2007). *P<0.05, **P<0.001, ***P<0.0001.
The BioJ catalytic residues are required for replication in macrophages and survival in mice
Given that loss of any of the three BioJ catalytic residues blocked growth in minimal medium, we expected that like the the S151A mutant the D248A, and H278A mutants might exhibit a severe replication defect in macrophages. We infected murine bone marrow-derived macrophages (mBMDM) with wild-type F. novicida, ΔbioJ, and each of the three BioJ catalytic mutant strains (S151A, D248A or H278A) and found that 6 h post-infection, the wild-type strain had replicated almost 10-fold whereas the ΔbioJ and all three catalytic triad mutants replicated only about 2-fold (Fig. 7C). However, when biotin was added to the medium at the time of infection, the ΔbioJ, S151A, D248A, and H278A replication defects were significantly reversed (Fig. 7C) thereby illustrating the importance of biotin availability during infection and the functional importance of BioJ during intracellular replication.
Finally, we set out to determine whether the catalytic triad was required for F. novicida virulence during in vivo infection. We performed competition experiments in which 1:1 mixtures of the wild-type strain with the ΔbioJ, S151A, D248A or H287A strains were used to infect mice. Forty-eight hours post-infection, the levels of the ΔbioJ strain were ~1-2 logs lower than the wild-type F. novicida in both spleen and liver (Fig. 7D). All three catalytic triad mutants displayed similar 1-2 log reductions in the spleen and liver levels (Fig. 7E-G). Taken together, these data demonstrate that BioJ is a novel Francisella-specific biotin gatekeeper enzyme that in the absence of free biotin is functionally required for bacterial replication in nutrient limited media and in macrophages, as well as for systemic survival in mice.
BioJ represents a new carboxyl-esterase subclade
Prior to this study, three enzymes, BioH, BioG and BioK, were known to catalyze the demethylation of pimeloyl-ACP methyl ester. Although the BioJ proteins were predicted to be members of the α, β-hydrolase family, they are evolutionarily distinct from E. coli BioH in that they are 50 aa longer that the E. coli protein and share essentially no sequence identity with BioH. Since, BioH, BioG, and BioK recognize the same physiological substrate (Me pimeloyl-ACP) despite their low sequence identity and share the same catalytic residues (Shapiro et al., 2012), we compared the phylogenetic relationship of these isozymes with BioJ and found that BioJ homologues are restricted to Francisella species (Fig. 8 and Fig. S2). A minimum-likelihood phylogenetic tree was constructed using six BioJs, nine BioHs, four BioKs and seven BioGs. These proteins are categorized into four different sub-clades. Although the BioH, BioG and BioK proteins group into the same clan, CL0028, the BioHs belong to the α,β-hydrolase 6 family whereas BioGs and BioKs are members of the α,β-hydrolase 5 family. All the BioJ homologues group into domain Abhydrolase 3 of Clan CL0028. Based on the structure of E. coli BioH and homology modeling of the other proteins, all five groups of proteins seem structurally distinct (Fig. 8), which is consistent with the diversity observed in their phylogenetic evolution (Fig. 8). Given the fact that BioJ homologues formed a unique subclade and were evolutionary distant from all of the other groups of functionally related proteins (Fig. 8), we therefore propose that it is a new class of biotin synthesis carboxylesterase.
Fig. 8.
Phylogenetic tree and structural modeling of the bacterial biotin synthesis gatekeeper enzymes
The modeled structure of each member except BioH which has a known structure is shown on the right. All BioJ homologues are found in Francisella species are given in red.
Discussion
Although bioH is not integrated into the biotin operon of E. coli, in numerous other bacteria bioH is found within the operon and is located immediately upstream of bioC (Rodionov et al., 2002). Other bacteria lack BioH but have a gene (either bioG or bioK) encoding an α,β-hydrolase that is able to perform the BioH function (Rodionov et al., 2002, Shapiro et al., 2012). An extreme example is Bacillus fragilis which encodes a BioG-BioC fusion protein (Rodionov et al., 2002, Shapiro et al., 2012). Francisella bioJ is the first example of a biotin synthesis α,β-hydrolase encoded next to, but not within, a biotin operon. Our view is that the α,β-hydrolases of biotin synthesis are “wild cards” that can be traded among bacteria or developed de novo within a specific group of bacteria. The gene encoding a given type of α,β-hydrolase can either become domesticated as is the case for those located in a biotin operon or remain completely undomesticated as is the case of E. coli bioH which is neither in the operon nor coregulated with the operon genes. By these criteria Francisella bioJ appears a partly domesticated gene in that it closely neighbors, but is not within, the biotin operon and seems to lack the sequence that putatively regulates the operon in response to biotin supply. BioJ like BioK is restricted to a specific group of bacteria, Francisella species and cyanobacteria, respectively, whereas BioH and BioG are found across a broad diversity of bacteria. The diversity of these α,β-hydrolases is in remarkable contrast to the very strongly conserved proteins responsible for synthesis of the biotin heterocyclic rings. A plausible explanation of this dichotomy is that ester hydrolysis is a simple reaction whereas ring formation requires much more complex chemistry. Indeed, it has been shown that a P. aeruginosa PAO1 esterase of unknown function can attain BioH activity by simple amino acid substitutions (Flores et al., 2012).
The only biotin-modified Francisella protein detected by genome sequence analysis has all of the hallmarks of AccB, the biotinylated subunit of the essential acetyl-CoA carboxylase reaction that initiates fatty acid synthesis (Fig S5). This argues that the lack of biotin engenders an inability to make both membrane phospholipids and the lipid A component of the outer membrane. If so, it might be expected that supplementation with exogenous fatty acids could bypass biotin deficiency. However, in other gram-negative bacteria such as E. coli this strategy fails because the lipid A biosynthetic pathway cannot utilize exogenous fatty acids (Raetz et al., 2007).
Francisella is unusual in that, despite the small genome size, it encodes two biotin protein ligase (BPL) genes whereas a single BPL gene seems the norm across biology (Beckett, 2009, Chapman-Smith & Cronan, 1999, Rodionov et al., 2002). The birA1 gene (FTN_0568) is annotated to encode a BPL lacking DNA binding activity, whereas birA2 (FTN_0811) is a bifunctional regulator retaining BPL function like E. coli BirA (Table S3). The encoded proteins show only about 28% sequence identity and thus the genes seem unlikely to have arisen by gene duplication. Transposon insertions into birA1 showed that the gene was necessary for bacterial replication in vivo and macrophage escape (Weiss et al., 2007, Asare & Abu Kwaik, 2010). However, since ligation of biotin to its cognate proteins is an essential reaction (Chapman-Smith & Cronan, 1999), recovery of these insertions indicates that another enzyme, probably BirA2, provides BPL activity. Indeed, the lack of insertions into the birA2 gene (Weiss et al., 2007, Asare & Abu Kwaik, 2010) argues that it encodes the housekeeping BPL required for growth in the laboratory.
Another unusual feature of Francisella biotin metabolism is that supplementation of biotin-free minimal medium with pimelate allows growth of bioJ strains albeit to a lesser extent than does biotin. Since the BioF reaction requires that one of the pimelate carboxyl groups be in thioester linkage to ACP or CoA, Francisella must contain an enzyme that activates pimelate. E. coli ΔbioH strains can also grow on pimelate, but only when a pimeloyl-CoA synthetase, such as Bacillus subtilis BioW, is expressed (Lin et al., 2010, Agarwal et al., 2012). However, a search for Francisella genes encoding BioW homologues was unsuccessful indicating that these bacteria encode a novel pimeloyl-CoA synthetase.
Experimental procedures
Strains and growth conditions
All E. coli strains (Table S1) were routinely grown at 37°C in liquid LB medium (Luria-Bertani medium containing 10 g of tryptone, 5 g of yeast extract and 10 g of NaCl per liter) or plates of LB agar. The biotin-free M9 minimal media containing 0.1% vitamin-free Casamino Acids and 0.2% glycerol as sole carbon source was used to test for biotin requirements. Antibiotics were supplemented as follows (in μg/ml): sodium ampicillin, 100 and kanamycin sulfate, 50. All F. novicida strains were grown in TSB/0.2% cysteine or Chamberlain’s Medium (CHB) (Teknova) (Chamberlain, 1965). Generation of the kanamycin (kan)-marked FTN_0818 deletion strain, the FTN_0818 clean deletion strain and the FTN_0818 serine point mutant strain (FTN_0818-S151A) were reported previously [Napier, 2012]. The aspartic acid (FTN0818-D248A) and histidine point mutant strains (FTN0818-H278A) were constructed by overlapping PCR using primers encoding a single amino acid substitution and using a kan-cassette for selection. These constructs were transformed into the FTN_0818 clean deletion mutant strain followed by selection on kanamycin plates (30 μg/ml). All strains mentioned above were verified by PCR and sequencing (Eurofins EWG Operon).
Site-directed mutagenesis
Site-directed mutagenesis was performed as described by Zheng et al. (Zheng et al., 2004). The PCR reaction system (25 μl) included the following components: 2.5 μl of 10x pfx buffer (Invitrogen), 0.5 μl of 50 mM MgSO4 (Invitrogen), 0.5 μl of 40 mM dNTP mix (10 mM each), 1.0 μl of forward/reverse primers (Fphi(S151A)-F plus Fphi(S151A)-R, 10 pmol/μl) (Table S2), 1.0 μl of pBAD322-Fphi (or pET28-Fphi) as template (10 ng/μl), 0.5 μl of Platinum pfx (2.5 U/μl, Invitrogen), and 17.0 μl of distilled sterilized H2O. The reaction was done using the program consisting of a denaturing cycle at 95°C for 5 min; 20 cycles comprised of 95°C for 50 s, 55°C for 50 s, and 68°C for 6.5 min and a final step of 8 min at 68°C. To remove the residual template plasmid, the gel purified PCR products were digested for overnight with DpnI (20 U/μl, New England Biolabs) at 37 °C. Subsequently, the processed PCR products were transformed into chemically competent cells of Topo 10 (Invitrogen) and the inserts of purified plasmids were confirmed by direct DNA sequencing. The two mutant plasmids pBAD322-Fphi (S151A) and pET28-Fphi (S151A) were transformed into the ΔbioH strain STL24 (Agarwal et al., 2012, Lin et al., 2010) and strain BL21(DE3), respectively.
Plasmids and DNA manipulations
F. philomiragia (ATCC 25017) genomic DNA was purchased from ATCC for PCR amplification of Fphi_1796 (bioJ). Since F. philomiragia genomic DNA has a very low GC content (32.0%) (Zeytun et al., 2012), Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs) was required. The gel-purified PCR products (QIAGEN) were cloned into the XmaI-SphI digested low copy, arabinose-inducible expression vector pBAD322 and BamHI-XhoI T7 promoter-driven expression vector pET28(a) (Table S2) to give plasmids pBAD322-Fphi and pET28-Fphi (Table S1). All plasmid constructs were verified by direct DNA sequencing.
Protein expression and purification
The N-terminal hexahistidine tagged BioJ protein (wild type version plus three versions of mutants) was expressed in BL21(DE3) carrying pET28-Fphi (Table S1). IPTG was added to 0.3 mM to 500 ml bacterial cultures at an OD600 nmof 1.0 followed by incubation at 30°C for 6 h. The cells were pelleted by centrifugation (4200 g, 20 min), washed three times with ice-cold PBS buffer (101.4 mM Na2HPO4, 1.8 mM KH2PO4, 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 12% glycerol, pH 7.4) and resuspended in PBS buffer containing 25 mM imidazole. Following lysis in a French pressure cell and removal of bacterial debris by centrifugation (16,000×g for 60 min), the clarified supernatant was loaded on a nickel chelate resin (Qiagen) for no less than 2 h. After washing the column with ten column volumes of PBS buffer containing 50 mM imidazole, the BioJ proteins were eluted with 150 mM imidazole, dialyzed against PBS buffer and then concentrated by ultra-filtration (10 kDa cut-off, Amicon Ultra) (Feng & Cronan, 2010). The protein purity was visualized by gradient SDS-PAGE (4-20%), and further confirmed by liquid chromatography quadruple time-of-flight (qTOF) mass spectrometry of tryptic peptides as described previously (Feng & Cronan, 2011a, Feng & Cronan, 2011b).
Size exclusion chromatography and chemical cross-linking assays
The purified recombinant BioJ protein was subjected to gel filtration analyses using a Superdex 75 column (Pharmacia) run on an Äkta fast protein liquid chromatography system (GE Healthcare) as described previously (Feng & Cronan, 2010, Feng & Cronan, 2011b). The column effluent was monitored at a flow rate of 0.46 ml/min in PBS buffer (10 mM Na2HPO4, 2 mM KH2PO4, 20 mM Tris-HCl, 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, pH 7.4). The peak was collected and ana;lyzed by gradient SDS-PAGE (4-20%).
To further test the solution structure of Francisella BioJ, chemical cross-linking with ethylene glycol bis-succinimidylsuccinate (Pierce) was performed (Feng et al., 2013b). In each chemical cross-linking reaction (20 μl in total), the purified BioJ protein (~10 mg/ml) was separately mixed with different concentrations of cross-linker (0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 5.0, 10 and 20 μM), and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. All the reaction products were separated using gradient SDS-PAGE (4-20%).
Enzymatic assays
The in vitro enzymatic activity of BioJ and its derivatives was determined using the protocol established for the E. coli BioH with appropriate modifications (Agarwal et al., 2012, Flores et al., 2012, Shapiro et al., 2012). The enzymatic reaction was reconstituted in the 50 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.0) containing 5% glycerol. In each reaction with the total volume of 10 μl, BioJ (~14 μg/ml, 3.6 μM) was mixed with 150 μM of its physiological substrate pimeloyl-ACP methyl ester (or a shorter or longer homologue) and incubated at 37°C for 1 h. The generated products of these reactions were loaded into 20% PAGE gel containing 2.5 M urea and then run at 130V for 2.5 h.
MALDI TOF/TOF mass spectrometry
The mixture of BioJ-catalyzing reaction (30 μl in total) was subjected to dialysis in buffer of 20 mM ammonium acetate (2L) overnight at 4 °C (Feng et al., 2013b). After ammonium acetate was evaporated under a stream of nitrogen (Feng & Cronan, 2009), the dried protein samples then were dissolved in methanol and mixed with 50 mg/mL 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (DHB) matrix (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) in 50% acetonitrile and 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in a 1:10 ratio and deposited on a standard stainless steel target. The mass spectra were collected in positive ion mode on an UltrafleXtreme MALDI TOF/TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) equipped with a frequency tripled Nd:YAG solid state laser using the FlexControl 1.4 software package (Bruker Daltonics). Following external calibration, 2000 spectra were acquired at 500 Hz using a randomized raster, summed, and saved for analysis. Data processing was done using the FlexAnalysis 3.4 software package (Bruker Daltonics). Spectra were smoothed and a baseline correction was applied using the built-in features of the software package (Feng et al., 2013b).
Reconstitution of the in vitro DTB synthesis system and the DTB bioassay
To test the potential role of BioJ in biotin biosynthesis, we reconstituted an in vitro system that included the crude extract of strain STL24 (E. coli ΔbioH) plus the various BioJ proteins as described by Lin et al. (Lin et al., 2010). The production of biotin was visualized using the biotin auxotrophic strain ER90 (ΔbioF bioC bioD)-based biotin bioassay previously developed (Lin et al., 2010, Feng et al., 2013a, Feng et al., 2013b).
First, the ΔbioH cell-free extracts were prepared as described by Lin and coworkers (Lin et al., 2010) with some modifications. Strain STL24 (E. coli ΔbioH) was cultivated at 37 °C to 0.8 OD600 in 200 ml of M9 minimal medium containing 1 nM biotin. To remove excess of biotin, the bacterial cells were washed twice in M9 media and sub-cultured into 1 liter of M9 minimal medium at 37 °C for 5 hours to derepress expression of the bio operon by starvation for biotin. The pelleted cells were lysed by passage through a French pressure cell in assay buffer at 17,500 p.s.i. and then centrifuged at 20,000g for 30 min to obtain the supernatant. The soluble fraction was further purified through ammonium sulfate precipitation (85% of saturation followed by 1 h of centrifugation at 10,000×g (small molecules and ACP species remain soluble in such ammonium sulfate solutions. To remove ammonium sulfate and any remaining small molecules, the solubilized precipitate was subjected to dialysis using Slide-A-Lyzer Dialysis Cassette G2 of 10 kDa cut-off (Thermo Scientific) against 1x PBS assay buffer at 4°C overnight. Bradford assays were adopted to determine the protein concentration of the crude extracts using the BioRad Protein Assay Dye Reagent (Thermo Scientific).
The in vitro system for biotin synthesis was developed as Lin and coauthors (Lin et al., 2010) reported with minor changes. The components for were () are included as follows: 1 mg of ΔbioH cell-free crude extract protein, 10 mM MgCl2, 5 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1 mM pyridoxal-5′-phosphate (PLP), 1 mM L-alanine, 1 mM KHPO4, 1 mM NADPH, 1 mM ATP, 1 mM glucose-6-phosphate, 1 mM S-adenosy-L-methionine, 60 μM pimeloyl-ACP methyl ester and 0.5 μM (~20 μg/ml) of a purified BioJ protein in 100 μl total volume. The reactions were incubated at 37 °C for ~3 h and quenched by immersion in boiling water for 15 min.
Biotin production was visualized using the reduction of 2,3,5-triphenyl tetrazolium chloride to the insoluble red formazan resulting from bacterial growth (Lin et al., 2010, del Campillo-Campbell et al., 1979, Feng et al., 2013a, Feng et al., 2013b),
Growth curves of Francisella
Bacteria were subcultured to an OD600 of 0.03 in TSB/0.2% cysteine or Chamberlain’s Medium (CHB) (Teknova) (Chamberlain, 1965) for F. novicida, while LVS cultures were grown in modified Mueller-Hinton (MH) broth described previously (Su et al., 2007, Llewellyn et al., 2011, Napier et al., 2012). Subcultures were read hourly using a SynergyMX BioTek plate reader (Applied Biosystems). Biotin (0.25 μM) (Merck KGaA) or pimelate (200 μg/mL) (Sigma-Aldrich) was added when appropriate.
Macrophage preparation and infections
Bone marrow-derived macrophages (mBMDMs) were prepared as described previously (Su et al., 2007, Llewellyn et al., 2011, Napier et al., 2012). Briefly, bone marrow was collected from the femurs of mice. Bone marrow cells were plated into sterile petri dishes and incubated in DMEM supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS and 10% macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF)-conditioned medium (collected from M-CSF-producing NIH3T3 cells). Bone marrow cells were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 and harvested after 6 days. All mBMDMs were incubated before and during infection in 24 well plates at 37°C with 5% CO2. For infection, mBMDMs were seeded at 5 × 105/well and incubated overnight at 37°C with 5% CO2. mBMDMs were infected at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10:1 (Su et al., 2007, Llewellyn et al., 2011, Napier et al., 2012).
Mouse infections
For mouse infections, female C57BL/6 mice (6-8 wk) (Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME) were housed under specific pathogen-free housing at Emory University. Experimental studies were performed in accordance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines. Competitive index [CI = (mut output/WT output)/(mut input/WT input], as described previously (Su et al., 2007, Llewellyn et al., 2011, Napier et al., 2012). Statistical analysis for CI experiments described previously (Weiss et al., 2007).
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant AI15650 to J.E.C. from National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). D.S.W. was supported by NIH/NIAID grant U54-AI057157 from the Southeastern Regional Center of Excellence for Emerging Infections and Biodefense and a Burroughs Wellcome Fund Investigator in the Pathogenesis of Infectious Disease award. We would like thank Dr. Peter Yau (Biotechnology Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) for technical assistance in qTOF, and Dr. Kelvin Tucker (Mass Spectrometry Laboratory, School of Chemical Sciences, UIUC) for help in MALDI TOF.
Footnotes
Competing interests
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Author contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: YF, DSW and JEC. Performed the experiments: YF, BAN and MM. Analyzed the data: YF, BAN, MM, SKH, DSW and JEC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: YF, BAN, MM, SKH, DSW and JEC. Wrote the paper: YF, DSW and JEC.
References
- Agarwal V, Lin S, Lukk T, Nair SK, Cronan JE. Structure of the enzyme-acyl carrier protein (ACP) substrate gatekeeper complex required for biotin synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:17406–17411. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1207028109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alkhuder K, Meibom KL, Dubail I, Dupuis M, Charbit A. Glutathione provides a source of cysteine essential for intracellular multiplication of Francisella tularensis. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000284. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Asare R, Abu Kwaik Y. Molecular complexity orchestrates modulation of phagosome biogenesis and escape to the cytosol of macrophages by Francisella tularensis. Environ Microbiol. 2010;12:2559–2586. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02229.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Attwood PV, Wallace JC. Chemical and catalytic mechanisms of carboxyl transfer reactions in biotin-dependent enzymes. Acc Chem Res. 2002;35:113–120. doi: 10.1021/ar000049+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barker JR, Chong A, Wehrly TD, Yu JJ, Rodriguez SA, Liu J, Celli J, Arulanandam BP, Klose KE. The Francisella tularensis pathogenicity island encodes a secretion system that is required for phagosome escape and virulence. Mol Microbiol. 2009;74:1459–1470. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06947.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beckett D. Biotin sensing: universal influence of biotin status on transcription. Annu Rev Genet. 2007;41:443–464. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.41.042007.170450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beckett D. Biotin sensing at the molecular level. J Nutr. 2009;139:167–170. doi: 10.3945/jn.108.095760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cederlund A, Gudmundsson GH, Agerberth B. Antimicrobial peptides important in innate immunity. FEBS J. 2011;278:3942–3951. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2011.08302.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Celli J, Zahrt TC. Mechanisms of Francisella tularensis intracellular pathogenesis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2013;3:a010314. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a010314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chamberlain RE. Evaluation of live Tularemia vaccine prepared in a chemically defined medium. Appl Microbiol. 1965;13:232–235. doi: 10.1128/am.13.2.232-235.1965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chapman-Smith A, Cronan JE., Jr. The enzymatic biotinylation of proteins: a post-translational modification of exceptional specificity. Trends Biochem Sci. 1999;24:359–363. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(99)01438-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crane DD, Warner SL, Bosio CM. A novel role for plasmin-mediated degradation of opsonizing antibody in the evasion of host immunity by virulent, but not attenuated, Francisella tularensis. J Immunol. 2009;183:4593–4600. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cronan JE, Lin S. Synthesis of the alpha,omega-dicarboxylic acid precursor of biotin by the canonical fatty acid biosynthetic pathway. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2010;15:407–413. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2011.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- del Campillo-Campbell A, Dykhuizen D, Cleary PP. Enzymic reduction of d-biotin d-sulfoxide to d-biotin. Methods Enzymol. 1979;62:379–385. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(79)62244-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feng Y, Cronan JE. Escherichia coli unsaturated fatty acid synthesis: complex transcription of the fabA gene and in vivo identification of the essential reaction catalyzed by FabB. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:29526–29535. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.023440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feng Y, Cronan JE. Overlapping repressor binding sites result in additive regulation of Escherichia coli FadH by FadR and ArcA. J Bacteriol. 2010;192:4289–4299. doi: 10.1128/JB.00516-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feng Y, Cronan JE. Complex binding of the FabR repressor of bacterial unsaturated fatty acid biosynthesis to its cognate promoters. Mol Microbiol. 2011a;80:195–218. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07564.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feng Y, Cronan JE. The Vibrio cholerae fatty acid regulatory protein, FadR, represses transcription of plsB, the gene encoding the first enzyme of membrane phospholipid biosynthesis. Mol Microbiol. 2011b;81:1020–1033. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07748.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feng Y, Xu J, Zhang H, Chen Z, Srinivas S. Brucella BioR regulator defines a complex regulatory mechanism for bacterial biotin metabolism. J Bacteriol. 2013a;195:3451–3467. doi: 10.1128/JB.00378-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feng Y, Zhang H, Cronan JE. Profligate biotin synthesis in alpha-proteobacteria - a developing or degenerating regulatory system? Mol Microbiol. 2013b;88:77–92. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Flores H, Lin S, Contreras-Ferrat G, Cronan JE, Morett E. Evolution of a new function in an esterase: simple amino acid substitutions enable the activity present in the larger paralog, BioH. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2012;25:387–395. doi: 10.1093/protein/gzs035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Geier H, Celli J. Phagocytic receptors dictate phagosomal escape and intracellular proliferation of Francisella tularensis. Infect Immun. 2011;79:2204–2214. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01382-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heikinheimo P, Goldman A, Jeffries C, Ollis DL. Of barn owls and bankers: a lush variety of alpha/beta hydrolases. Structure. 1999;7:R141–146. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(99)80079-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jochens H, Hesseler M, Stiba K, Padhi SK, Kazlauskas RJ, Bornscheuer UT. Protein engineering of alpha/beta-hydrolase fold enzymes. Chembiochem. 2011;12:1508–1517. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201000771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones CL, Napier BA, Sampson TR, Llewellyn AC, Schroeder MR, Weiss DS. Subversion of host recognition and defense systems by Francisella spp. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2012a;76:383–404. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.05027-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones CL, Sampson TR, Nakaya HI, Pulendran B, Weiss DS. Repression of bacterial lipoprotein production by Francisella novicida facilitates evasion of innate immune recognition. Cell Microbiol. 2012b;14:1531–1543. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2012.01816.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kawai T, Akira S. The role of pattern-recognition receptors in innate immunity: update on Toll-like receptors. Nature immunology. 2010;11:373–384. doi: 10.1038/ni.1863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Knowles JR. The mechanism of biotin-dependent enzymes. Annual review of biochemistry. 1989;58:195–221. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.58.070189.001211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Larsson P, Oyston PC, Chain P, Chu MC, Duffield M, Fuxelius HH, Garcia E, Halltorp G, Johansson D, Isherwood KE, Karp PD, Larsson E, Liu Y, Michell S, Prior J, Prior R, Malfatti S, Sjostedt A, Svensson K, Thompson N, Vergez L, Wagg JK, Wren BW, Lindler LE, Andersson SG, Forsman M, Titball RW. The complete genome sequence of Francisella tularensis, the causative agent of tularemia. Nat Genet. 2005;37:153–159. doi: 10.1038/ng1499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lin S, Cronan JE. Closing in on complete pathways of biotin biosynthesis. Mol Biosyst. 2010;7:1811–1821. doi: 10.1039/c1mb05022b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lin S, Cronan JE. The BioC O-methyltransferase catalyzes methyl esterification of malonyl-acyl carrier protein, an essential step in biotin synthesis. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:37010–37020. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.410290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lin S, Hanson RE, Cronan JE. Biotin synthesis begins by hijacking the fatty acid synthetic pathway. Nat Chem Biol. 2010;6:682–688. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Llewellyn AC, Jones CL, Napier BA, Bina JE, Weiss DS. Macrophage replication screen identifies a novel Francisella hydroperoxide resistance protein involved in virulence. PLoS One. 2011;6:e24201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McCaffrey RL, Schwartz JT, Lindemann SR, Moreland JG, Buchan BW, Jones BD, Allen LA. Multiple mechanisms of NADPH oxidase inhibition by type A and type B Francisella tularensis. J Leukoc Biol. 2010;88:791–805. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1209811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nano FE, Zhang N, Cowley SC, Klose KE, Cheung KK, Roberts MJ, Ludu JS, Letendre GW, Meierovics AI, Stephens G, Elkins KL. A Francisella tularensis pathogenicity island required for intramacrophage growth. J Bacteriol. 2004;186:6430–6436. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.19.6430-6436.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Napier BA, Meyer L, Bina JE, Miller MA, Sjostedt A, Weiss DS. Link between intraphagosomal biotin and rapid phagosomal escape in Francisella. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:18084–18089. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1206411109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raetz CR, Reynolds CM, Trent MS, Bishop RE. Lipid A modification systems in gram-negative bacteria. Annu Rev Biochem. 2007;76:295–329. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.76.010307.145803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ray K, Marteyn B, Sansonetti PJ, Tang CM. Life on the inside: the intracellular lifestyle of cytosolic bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7:333–340. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rodionov DA, Mironov AA, Gelfand MS. Conservation of the biotin regulon and the BirA regulatory signal in Eubacteria and Archaea. Genome Res. 2002;12:1507–1516. doi: 10.1101/gr.314502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rohmer L, Fong C, Abmayr S, Wasnick M, Larson Freeman TJ, Radey M, Guina T, Svensson K, Hayden HS, Jacobs M, Gallagher LA, Manoil C, Ernst RK, Drees B, Buckley D, Haugen E, Bovee D, Zhou Y, Chang J, Levy R, Lim R, Gillett W, Guenthener D, Kang A, Shaffer SA, Taylor G, Chen J, Gallis B, D’Argenio DA, Forsman M, Olson MV, Goodlett DR, Kaul R, Miller SI, Brittnacher MJ. Comparison of Francisella tularensis genomes reveals evolutionary events associated with the emergence of human pathogenic strains. Genome Biol. 2007;8:R102. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-6-r102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rus H, Cudrici C, Niculescu F. The role of the complement system in innate immunity. Immunol Res. 2005;33:103–112. doi: 10.1385/IR:33:2:103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sampson TR, Saroj SD, Llewellyn AC, Tzeng YL, Weiss DS. A CRISPR/Cas system mediates bacterial innate immune evasion and virulence. Nature. 2013;497:254–257. doi: 10.1038/nature12048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sanishvili R, Yakunin AF, Laskowski RA, Skarina T, Evdokimova E, Doherty-Kirby A, Lajoie GA, Thornton JM, Arrowsmith CH, Savchenko A, Joachimiak A, Edwards AM. Integrating structure, bioinformatics, and enzymology to discover function: BioH, a new carboxylesterase from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:26039–26045. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M303867200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Santic M, Molmeret M, Barker JR, Klose KE, Dekanic A, Doric M, Abu Kwaik Y. A Francisella tularensis pathogenicity island protein essential for bacterial proliferation within the host cell cytosol. Cell Microbiol. 2007;9:2391–2403. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.00968.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sen B, Meeker A, Ramakrishnan G. The fslE homolog, FTL_0439 (fupA/B), mediates siderophore-dependent iron uptake in Francisella tularensis LVS. Infect Immun. 2010;78:4276–4285. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00503-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shapiro MM, Chakravartty V, Cronan JE. Remarkable diversity in the enzymes catalyzing the last step in synthesis of the pimelate moiety of biotin. PLoS One. 2012;7:e49440. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Su J, Yang J, Zhao D, Kawula TH, Banas JA, Zhang JR. Genome-wide identification of Francisella tularensis virulence determinants. Infect Immun. 2007;75:3089–3101. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01865-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weinberg ED. Iron and susceptibility to infectious disease. Science. 1974;184:952–956. doi: 10.1126/science.184.4140.952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weiss DS, Brotcke A, Henry T, Margolis JJ, Chan K, Monack DM. In vivo negative selection screen identifies genes required for Francisella virulence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:6037–6042. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609675104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilson JE, Katkere B, Drake JR. Francisella tularensis induces ubiquitin-dependent major histocompatibility complex class II degradation in activated macrophages. Infect Immun. 2009;77:4953–4965. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00844-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Woong Park S, Klotzsche M, Wilson DJ, Boshoff HI, Eoh H, Manjunatha U, Blumenthal A, Rhee K, Barry CE, 3rd, Aldrich CC, Ehrt S, Schnappinger D. Evaluating the sensitivity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to biotin deprivation using regulated gene expression. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1002264. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zeytun A, Malfatti SA, Vergez LM, Shin M, Garcia E, Chain PS. Complete genome sequence of Francisella philomiragia ATCC 25017. J Bacteriol. 2012;194:3266. doi: 10.1128/JB.00413-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zheng L, Baumann U, Reymond JL. An efficient one-step site-directed and site-saturation mutagenesis protocol. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:e115. doi: 10.1093/nar/gnh110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.







