Chlorinated compounds are among the most common and versatile building blocks in organic synthesis. Among these, α-chlorocarbonyl derivatives are of synthetic value owing to the variety of functional groups that can be introduced both at the chlorinated α-carbon atom and at the carbonyl functionality.[1] For instance, they readily undergo substitution/addition reactions[1, 2] and cross-coupling reactions[3] and are useful precursors to heterocycles.[4]
While a number of methods have been reported for the electrophilic halogenation of aldehydes or ketones containing only one enolizable position, the same reaction for unsymmetrical aliphatic ketones is challenging.[1] Here, most methods rely on steric or electronic differentiation for regioselective functionalization of carbonyl compounds (Scheme 1a).[1, 5] However, many ketones lack the bias to enolize with complete regioselectivity, and the enolization cannot always be directed to the desired position. Importantly, the formation of mixtures of halocarbonyl compounds limits both the yield and the overall synthetic utility owing to the challenge of separating constitutional isomers.
We envisaged that α-chloroketones could be synthesized with complete regiocontrol from allylic alcohols through a 1,3-hydrogen shift/chlorination catalyzed by transition metals. A considerable advantage of using allylic alcohols as enol equivalents[6, 7] is that the new bond (to the electrophile) is formed exclusively at the alkenylic carbon atom of the allylic alcohol [RCH(OH)–CH=CHR; Scheme 1b]. This type of transformation has almost exclusively been investigated using carbon electrophiles (e.g. aldehydes or imines).[8, 9a,9b] A drawback with all these procedures has always been the undesired formation of unfunctionalized ketone by-products (Scheme 1b). Recently, we reported the first example of 1,3-hydrogen shift/halogenation for the preparation of α-fluoroketones.[9c,9d] While this represented a success in terms of merging a transition-metal-catalyzed isomerization with an electrophilic halogenation, the formation of nonfluorinated ketones (5–20 %) could not be avoided and led to challenging separations. Herein, we describe the first chlorination of allylic alcohols, which affords single constitutional isomers of α-chloroketones in up to>99 % yield, and for the first time the formation of ketone by-products is completely suppressed (Scheme 1c).
We first investigated the isomerization/chlorination of phenylpent-1-en-3-ol (2 a) catalyzed by [{Cp*IrCl2}2] in the presence of N-chlorosuccinimide (NCS). In THF and at room temperature, only traces of the desired monochlorinated carbonyl compound 3 a were formed together with a complicated mixture of by-products (Table 1, entry 1). However, introducing water as a cosolvent had a strong influence on the reaction outcome, and the yield of 3 a gradually increased (entries 2, 3). Notably, in THF/H2O=1:2, a quantitative yield of 3 a was obtained in 6 h with only 0.25 mol % of [{Cp*IrCl2}2] (entry 4). Under these conditions, 3 a was formed with complete regiocontrol and nonchlorinated ketone 4 a or enone 5 a were not detected. Furthermore, the reactions do not require inert conditions. In the absence of THF, a low yield of 3 a was obtained (entry 5). Chloramine-T or 1,3-dichloro-5,5-dimethylhydantoin afforded poor yields of 3 a (entries 6–7).
Table 1.
Entry | THF/H2O (v/v) | Cl source | Conv. of2 a[%][b] | 3 a/4 a/5 a[%][b] |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 100:0 | NCS | 58 | 1:–:– |
2[c] | 20:1 | NCS | 90 | 3:2:1 |
3 | 5:1 | NCS | 85 | 50:4:– |
4[d,e] | 1:2 | NCS | >99 | >99:–:– |
5 | 0:100 | NCS | 34 | 30:–:4 |
6 | 1:2 | 1,3-dichloro-5,5-dimethylhydantoin | >99 | 8:2:2 |
7 | 1:2 | chloramine-T | 30 | 2:2:– |
2 a (0.4 mmol, 0.2 M).
Determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy with respect to an internal standard (1,2,4,5-tetrachloro-3-nitrobenzene).
16 h.
0.25 mol % of [{Cp*IrCl2}2] (0.5 mol % Ir).
THF/H2O (v/v 1:1) afforded also >99 % yield of 3 a.
To evaluate the reaction scope, a variety of aliphatic and α-aryl allylic alcohols (2 a–2 o), including cyclic and functionalized substrates, were subjected to the optimized reaction conditions (Scheme 2). The corresponding α-chloroketones (3 a–3 o) were obtained as single constitutional isomers in excellent yields. Unfunctionalized ketones (4) or side products derived from overchlorination or from chlorination of benzylic positions were not detected for any of the substrates. The enantiopure allylic alcohol 2 k underwent the chlorination reaction without epimerization of the stereogenic center. Allylic alcohols with trisubstituted or 1,1-disubstituted olefins did not give satisfactory yields (see the Supporting Information). The methodology is suitable for multigram-scale reactions, and the chlorination of 2 e and 2 o gave the same yields on a 10 g scale (52–78 mmol) as on a smaller scale (1 mmol).
The corresponding transformation of primary allylic alcohols into α-functionalized aldehydes is extremely rare.[8g, 10] Often, transition metal catalysts fail to promote the tandem processes from these substrates, and side reactions such as decarbonylation[11] and self-condensation[8g, 12] can occur with the aldehyde products. However, with the mild reaction conditions reported herein, various α-chloroaldehydes (7 a–f) were prepared in good yields from primary allylic alcohols 6 a–f (Scheme 3). In some cases, yields were slightly lower owing to the volatility of the product (7 a), formation of enones (7 b, 7 d–e), or incomplete conversion (7 f).
The varied results obtained in different mixtures of THF and H2O (Table 1) indicate the need for a highly polar solvent and may be related to catalyst activation through dissociation of a chloride ligand from 1. A comparison of the catalytic activity of 1 with that of cationic [Cp*Ir(H2O)3]SO4 (8)[13] in the chlorination of 2 a (THF/H2O=1:2) resulted in identical reaction profiles. This result suggests that 1 and 8 are equally capable of forming an active catalyst at this THF/H2O ratio (Figure 1 and Figure S1 in the Supporting Information). However, by progressively decreasing the amount of water in the solvent, significant differences between 1 and 8 were observed. Thus, while severely diminished yields were obtained with 1 (Figure 1, middle row), the yields with aqua complex 8 were unaffected even at a THF/H2O ratio of 20:1 (back row). Furthermore, addition of NaCl to 8 gave results comparable to those obtained with 1 (front vs. middle row). The requirement for an aqueous solvent (Table 1) is therefore likely associated with chloride dissociation from 1. Still, water cannot be fully excluded from the solvent even with the chloride-free complex 8; in pure THF 8 afforded 3 a in only 40 % yield together with 22 % of the nonchlorinated ketone 4 a (back row).[14]
Previous studies support that the formation of α-functionalized carbonyl compounds from allylic alcohols occurs through: 1) a transition-metal-catalyzed 1,3-hydrogen shift forming an enolate or an enol intermediate, and 2) subsequent nucleophilic attack on the electrophile (Scheme 4).[6–9] In a cross-over experiment using deuterium-labeled [D1]-2 f, we have confirmed that the isomerization follows an intramolecular 1,3-hydrogen shift (Scheme 5 and the Supporting Information).[7b, 8] Although this result is consistent with the intermediacy of enol(ate)s, the details of the mechanism, and in particular of the C–Cl bond formation step, remain to be elucidated.
To demonstrate the potential of the present methodology, the procedure was used as a key step in the synthesis of 2-aminothiazoles. These are privileged structures that have found pharmaceutical applications such as in antibiotics[15] and anti-inflammatory drugs.[16] Despite their straightforward synthesis by condensation of thiourea with the corresponding α-chlorocarbonyl compounds, only a few 4,5-disubstituted 2-aminothiazoles have been reported.[17] We reasoned that the substitution pattern of these compounds could easily be varied by using a synthetic route from allylic alcohols that gives access to the appropriate chloroketone precursor. We show here a short synthesis of 2-aminothiazoles (9–12) from allylic alcohols (2 f, 2 c, 2 o, and 2 e, respectively, Scheme 6). The straightforward and high-yielding reactions illustrate the usefulness of this procedure in the preparation of target compounds that rely on α-chlorocarbonyl compounds as intermediates.
In conclusion, we report the first synthesis of α-chlorinated carbonyl compounds from secondary and primary allylic alcohols. A wide range of substrates were chlorinated in high yields and as single constitutional isomers. For the first time, the formation of nonfunctionalized ketone by-products has been suppressed. The reactions are air-tolerant, run in water/organic solvent mixtures at room temperature, and require low loadings of iridium. The methodology is operationally very simple and can be scaled up. On-going mechanistic investigations should also contribute to the future development of Ir-catalyzed reactions for the formation of carbon–heteroatom bonds, and will be reported in due course.
Experimental Section
[{Cp*IrCl2}2] (1, 0.25–0.5 mol %) was dissolved in THF/H2O (4.8 mL; 1:1 or 1:2). The allylic alcohol (1 mmol, 1 equiv) and NCS (1.2 equiv) were added, and the reaction was stirred at room temperature until full conversion. The mixture was extracted with Et2O (3×1 mL) and the organic layers dried over MgSO4 and evaporated. Purification by silica column chromatography (pentane/Et2O) afforded the α-chlorinated ketone/aldehyde.
References
- [1].Kimpe NDe, Verhé R. The Chemistry of α-Haloketones, α-Haloaldehydes and α-Haloimines. New York: Wiley; 1990. [Google Scholar]
- [2]. For example, see:
- [2a].Yasuda M, Tsuchida M, Baba A. Chem. Commun. 1998:563. [Google Scholar]
- [2b].Malkov AV, Stončius S, Kočovský P. Angew. Chem. 2007;119:3796. doi: 10.1002/anie.200700165. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 3722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2c].Shibatomi K, Yamamoto H. Angew. Chem. 2008;120:5880. doi: 10.1002/anie.200801682. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 5796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2d].Lai P-S, Dubland JA, Sarwar MG, Chudzinski MG, Taylor MS. Tetrahedron. 2011;67:7586. [Google Scholar]
- [3]. .
- [3a].Malosh CF, Ready JM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:10240. doi: 10.1021/ja0467768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3b].Liu C, He C, Shi W, Chen M, Lei A. Org. Lett. 2007;9:5601. doi: 10.1021/ol702456z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3c].Liu C, Deng Y, Wang J, Yang Y, Tang S, Lei A. Angew. Chem. 2011;123:7475. doi: 10.1002/anie.201101638. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 7337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Erian A, Sherif S, Gaber H. Molecules. 2003;8:793. [Google Scholar]
- [5]. For reviews on enantioselective α-chlorination with organocatalysts, see:
- [5a].Marigo M, Jorgensen KA. Chem. Commun. 2006:2001. doi: 10.1039/b517090g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5b].Smith AMR, Hii KK. Chem. Rev. 2011;111:1637. doi: 10.1021/cr100197z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6]. .
- [6a].van der Drift RC, Bouwman E, Drent E. J. Organomet. Chem. 2002;650:1. [Google Scholar]
- [6b].Uma R, Crévisy C, Grée R. Chem. Rev. 2003;103:27. doi: 10.1021/cr0103165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6c].Mantilli L, Mazet C. Chem. Lett. 2011;40:341. [Google Scholar]
- [6d].Lorenzo-Luis P, Romerosa A, Serrano-Ruiz M. ACS Catal. 2012;2:1079. [Google Scholar]
- [6e].Bizet V, Pannecoucke X, Renaud J-L, Cahard D. enantiospecific isomerization of allylic alcohols. Angew. Chem. 2012;124:6573. doi: 10.1002/anie.201200827. For a recent example of see Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 6467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7]. .
- [7a].Sheppard TD. Synlett. 2011:1340. [Google Scholar]
- [7b].Ahlsten N, Bartoszewicz A, Martín-Matute B. Dalton Trans. 2012;41:1660. doi: 10.1039/c1dt11678a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8]. For selected examples, see:
- [8a].Mizuno A, Kusama H, Iwasawa N. Chem. Eur. J. 2010;16:8248. doi: 10.1002/chem.201001068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8b].Yang X-F, Wang M, Varma RS, Li C-J. Org. Lett. 2003;5:657. doi: 10.1021/ol0273102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8c].Cuperly D, Petrignet J, Crévisy C, Grée R. Chem. Eur. J. 2006;12:3261. doi: 10.1002/chem.200501555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8d].Branchadell V, Crévisy C, Grée R. Chem. Eur. J. 2004;10:5795. doi: 10.1002/chem.200400466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8e].Petrignet J, Prathap I, Chandrasekhar S, Yadav JS, Grée R. Angew. Chem. 2007;119:6413. doi: 10.1002/anie.200701663. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 6297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8f].Cao HT, Roisnel T, Valleix A, Grée R. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011:3430. [Google Scholar]
- [8g].Lin L, Yamamoto K, Matsunaga S, Kanai M. Angew. Chem. 2012;124:10421. doi: 10.1002/anie.201205680. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 10275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9]. .
- [9a].Bartoszewicz A, Livendahl M, Martín-Matute B. Chem. Eur. J. 2008;14:10547. doi: 10.1002/chem.200801690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9b].Ahlsten N, Martín-Matute B. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009;351:2657. [Google Scholar]
- [9c].Ahlsten N, Martín-Matute B. Chem. Commun. 2011;47:8331. doi: 10.1039/c1cc12653a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9d].Ahlsten N, Bartoszewicz A, Agrawal S, Martín-Matute B. Synthesis. 2011:2600. [Google Scholar]
- [10].Quintard A, Alexakis A, Mazet C. Angew. Chem. 2011;123:2402. doi: 10.1002/anie.201007001. For a one-pot consecutive iridium/enamine isomerization halogenation, see: Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2011 50 2354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11]. .
- [11a].Esteruelas MA, Hernández YA, López AM, Oliván M, Rubio L. Organometallics. 2008;27:799. [Google Scholar]
- [11b].Garralda MA. Dalton Trans. 2009:3635. doi: 10.1039/b817263c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Batuecas M, Esteruelas MA, García-Yebra C, Oñate E. Organometallics. 2010;29:2166. [Google Scholar]
- [13]. .
- [13a].Ogo S, Makihara N, Watanabe Y. Organometallics. 1999;18:5470. Ogo et al. studied the equilibrium of [Cp*Ir(H2O)3]2+ in water, and found it to be reversibly deprotonated to form [(Cp*Ir)2(µOH)3]+ around pH 2.8. [Google Scholar]
- [13b].Nutton A, Bailey PM, Maitlis PM. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1981:1997. [Google Scholar]
- [14]. Gimeno used Ru chlorides to isomerize allylic alcohols in water and proposed that water is a participating ligand in the reaction mechanism. See: [Google Scholar]
- [14a].Bellarosa L, Díez J, Gimeno J, Lledós A, Suárez FJ, Ujaque G, Vicent C. Chem. Eur. J. 2012;18:7749. doi: 10.1002/chem.201103374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14b].Díez J, Gimeno J, Lledós A, Suárezy FJ, Vicent C. ACS Catal. 2012;2:2087. [Google Scholar]
- [15].Tsuji K, Ishikawa H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1994;4:1601. [Google Scholar]
- [16].Haviv F, Ratajczyk JD, DeNet RW, Kerdesky FA, Walters RL, Schmidt SP, Holms JH, Young PR, Carter GW. J. Med. Chem. 1988;31:1719. doi: 10.1021/jm00117a010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17]. .
- [17a].Donohoe TJ, Kabeshov MA, Rathi AH, Smith IED. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012;10:1093. doi: 10.1039/c1ob06587d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17b].Donohoe TJ, Kabeshov MA, Rathi AH, Smith IED. Synlett. 2010:2956. [Google Scholar]
- [17c].Aoyama T, Murata S, Arai I, Araki N, Takido T, Suzuki Y, Kodomari M. Tetrahedron. 2006;62:3201. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.