Abstract
A number of germ cell-specific transcription factors essential for ovarian formation and folliculogenesis have been identified and studied. However, the role of these factors during early embryonic development has been poorly explored. In the present study, we investigated the role of SEBOX, a maternal homeobox transcription factor, during early embryonic development in porcine parthenotes. mRNA for SEBOX is preferentially expressed in oocytes, and expression persists until embryonic genome activation (EGA). Knockdown of SEBOX by siRNA disrupted early embryonic development, but not oocyte maturation. Many maternal genes essential for early embryonic development were upregulated in SEBOX-depleted embryos. Moreover, some pluripotency-associated genes, including SOX2 and NANOG, were upregulated when SEBOX was knocked down. Therefore, our data demonstrate that SEBOX is required for early embryonic development in pigs and appears to regulate the degradation of maternal transcripts and the expression of pluripotency genes.
Keywords: Homeobox, Maternal Factor, Porcine oocyte, SEBOX, Transcription factor
In most organisms, including mammals, early embryonic development relies primarily on maternal factors that are encoded by maternal effect genes that accumulate during oogenesis [1, 2]. These maternal factors play crucial roles in successful embryo development before, and also after, embryonic genome activation (EGA) [3]. Although several maternal factors, including Mater, Stella, Zar1, Npm2 and Brg1, have been reported in the mouse [4,5,6,7,8], there is still limited data regarding the maternal factors involved in early embryo development in mammals.
Homeobox genes are a large family of genes that direct the formation of many body structures during early embryonic development. The homeobox genes share a highly conserved DNA-binding domain, known as a homeodomain [9], that recognizes and binds to specific DNA sequences in the regulatory regions of genes. Therefore, most proteins containing a homeodomain act as transcription factors that control the expression of other genes.
Recently, several homeodomain-containing maternal factors were shown to play crucial roles during oocyte development. For example, a deficiency in either newborn ovary homeobox (Nobox) or LIM-homeobox protein 8 (Lhx8) affects the expression of numerous germ cell-specific genes essential for germ cell development and, consequently, accelerates postnatal oocyte loss, causing female infertility [10,11,12]. More recently, skin-embryo-brain-oocyte homeobox (Sebox), a paired-like homeobox gene, was found to be essential for early oogenesis by regulating the expression of genes that are required during germ cell development in the mouse [13]. Despite extensive studies on the function of homeobox transcription factors during oogenesis, the role of these factors during early embryonic development is poorly understood. It is now becoming evident that these transcription factors are crucial for EGA and thereby regulate early embryo development. For example, knockdown of NOBOX in bovine zygotes impaired early embryo development and altered the expression profile of EGA-related genes at the 8-cell stage, as well as pluripotency genes at the blastocyst stage [14]. In addition, downregulation of Sebox in the mouse zygote blocked embryonic development [15].
Although these data clearly indicate that maternal transcription factors are involved in early embryonic development, as well as oogenesis, the molecular mechanics underlying the functions of these factors in early embryonic development have not been well defined. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the role of the maternal transcription factor SEBOX during early embryonic development in porcine parthenotes. We characterized the expression profile of SEBOX and its downstream target genes to understand the mechanisms that regulate early embryonic gene expression. Our data demonstrate that SEBOX is an essential maternal transcription factor that regulates both the degradation of mRNAs encoding many maternal factors and the expression of pluripotency genes.
Materials and Methods
Isolation of denuded oocytes, cumulus cells and mural granulosa cells
Prepubertal porcine ovaries were collected from a local slaughterhouse and transported to the laboratory at 25 C in Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS) supplemented with 75 μg/l penicillin G and 50 μg/l streptomycin sulfate. Cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) were aspirated from follicles 2–8 mm in diameter with an 18-gauge needle and a disposable 10 ml syringe. Clumps of mural granulosa cells were picked from the aspirate. Cumulus cells were obtained by repeated pipetting of COCs through a fine-bore pipette. Denuded oocytes were exposed to a 0.1% trypsin solution in DPBS to ensure complete removal of the cumulus cells. Samples were lysed in lysis buffer and stored frozen at –80 C.
In vitro maturation and parthenogenetic activation
The COCs were washed three times with Hepes-buffered Tyrode’s medium containing 0.1% (w/v) PVP (Hepes-TL-PVA). Each group of 50 COCs was matured in 500 μl of tissue culture medium (TCM)-199 (with Earle’s salts; Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) supplemented with 0.57 mM cysteine (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), 10 ng/ml EGF (Sigma), 10 IU/ml PMSG (Sigma) and 10 IU/ml hCG (Sigma) under paraffin oil at 39 C for 44 h. Following maturation, cumulus cells were removed by pipetting in the presence of 1 mg/ml hyaluronidase for 2–3 min. Oocytes were activated for parthenogenesis in 0.3 M mannitol (Sigma) supplemented with 1.0 mM Ca2+, 0.1 mM MgCl2 and 0.5 mM Hepes with two 110 kV/cm DC pulses of 50 μs in duration separated by 100 ms. After 3 h of culture in porcine zygote medium 3 (PZM3) containing 7.5 μg/ml cytochalasin B (Sigma), embryos were washed several times in PZM3 containing 0.4% (w/v) BSA and cultured in the same medium at 38.5 C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air.
siRNA injection and embryo culture
Knockdown of endogenous SEBOX in porcine oocyte and embryos was performed via microinjection of SEBOX small interfering RNA (siRNA) at the GV stage and 6–8 h post activation, respectively. The siRNAs were designed by and purchased from a local company (Bioneer, Daejon, Korea, Table 2). The siRNA in medium was added to an injection pipette with a tip diameter of less than 1 μm using a micro-loader (5242 956.003, Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). The siRNA injections were performed using an inverted microscope (Nikon TE2000U) equipped with a micromanipulation system (Narishige, Tokyo, Japan). Fifty oocytes/embryos per group were transferred to 10 μl drops of manipulation medium (TCM-199 supplemented with 0.6 mM NaCO3, 3 mM Hepes, 30 mM NaCl, and 0.1% BSA). The embryos were held in place using a holding pipette, and the plasma membrane was penetrated by the injection pipette with constant siRNA medium flow until obvious swelling was observed. To assess injection damage, oocytes/embryos were injected with elution buffer alone as a sham control. Oocytes after injection were cultured in maturation medium, while embryos were cultured in PZM3 droplets until collection. Germinal vesicle (GV) and metaphase II (MII) oocytes were collected before parthenogenetic activation, and embryo at the 1-cell (1C), 2-cell (2C), 4-cell (4C), 8-cell (8C), morula (MO), and blastocyst (BL) stages were collected at 6, 24, 48, 120, 124, and 168 h after parthenogenetic activation, respectively.
Table 2. Porcine SEBOX siRNAs used in the current study.
No. | Sequence (5’→ 3’) |
1 | F: CUCUUCAGAGCGAGCUACUTT R: AGUAGCUCGCUCUGAAGAGTT |
2 | F: CAGCCUCCAUUCUCCAACATT R: UGUUGGAUAAUGGAGGCUGTT |
3 | F: CUCUCUUCAGAGCGAGCUATT R: UAGCUCGCUCUGAAGAGAGTT |
Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)
The numbers of embryos used for qPCR at the GV, MII, 1C, 2C, 4C, MO, and BL stages were 20, 20, 20, 20, 15, 10, and 10, respectively. Extraction of mRNA and cDNA synthesis were performed with a Dynabeads mRNA Direct Kit (61012, Invitrogen) and SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis Kit (18080-051, Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. qPCR was conducted using a DyNAmo HS SYBR Green qPCR Kit (F-410L, Thermo Scientific, Vantaa, Finland) according to the manufacturer’s instructions on a CFX96 Touch Real-time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad). The PCR protocol was as follows: 95 C for 15 min, 40 cycles of 95 C for 20 sec, primer annealing temperature for 20 sec, 72 C for 30 sec, and finally 95 C for 10 sec. Gene-specific primers were designed with Primer Premier 6 (PREMIER Biosoft, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and the specificity for the target genes was confirmed using primer BLAST (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/). GAPDH was used as an internal reference (Table 1). To visualize qPCR products, samples were separated by electrophoresis in 2% agarose gels.
Table 1. Primers used in the current study.
Genes | GenBank accession no. |
Primer sequence (5’→ 3’) |
Annealing temperature (C) |
Product size |
GAPDH | AF017079 | F:GGGCATGAACCATGAGAAGT R: AGCAGGGATGATGTTCTGG |
60 | 230 |
SEBOX | XM_003358176.1 | F: CCTATCCCGACATTGGCACC R: ATTCTCTTGGCTCTGCGGTT |
60 | 100 |
ZAR1 | NM_001129956.1 | F: CCATAAACCCTGGTCCTACTGA R: TCAAATACAGCCTTTCGTGAAG |
55 | 118 |
GDF9 | NM_001001909.1 | F: CTACAACACTGTCCGGCTCTT R: CACCAGGCTGCACTCACATT |
60 | 208 |
BMP15 | NM_001005155 | F: CCCTCGGGTACTACACTATG R: GGCTGGGCAATCATATCCT |
60 | 192 |
MOS | NM_001113219.1 | F: CGGCAACGTCACCTTACA R: CCAGGGAATACTTGAGACACTT |
57 | 119 |
H1FOO | NM_001205063.1 | F: AGTGGATGTCTTTCGGCTCA R: CGTCTTCCTGGACTGGATTT |
60 | 248 |
POU5F1 | NM_001113060.1 | F: GTTCAGCCAAACGACCATCT R: TCTCGATACTTGTCCGCTTTC |
58 | 182 |
NANOG | NM_001129971.1 | F: GGGGTGGTTAGCTCCTGTTC R: CGCTGGAAATGGATGCTTCG |
60 | 241 |
SOX2 | NM_001123197.1 | F: CCCGTGGTTACCTCTTCTTCC R: TACCGTTGATGGCCGTGCC |
60 | 175 |
CDX2 | XM_003130908.2 | F: CAGGACAGGGCCTTGTTTAG R: CAGGTTGGCTCTGGCATTT |
58 | 88 |
FSHR | NM_214386.1 | F: CCAAGAACTTCCGCAGGGAT R: TGGAGGGCAGTGACCATTTC |
60 | 134 |
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis of qPCR and preimplantation developmental data was evaluated using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and a log-liner model with the IBM SPSS Statistics 19 software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM derived from at least three independent experiments. A value of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Expression of porcine SEBOX mRNA
To determine the expression pattern of porcine SEBOX, we performed an RT-PCR analysis with normalized cDNAs derived from various porcine tissues (Fig. 1A). Expression was observed predominantly in the ovary and liver. Low level expression was also observed in the testis and lung. Moreover, RT-PCR analysis of oocytes, granulosa cells and cumulus cells revealed that porcine SEBOX is expressed exclusively in oocytes and not in other follicular somatic cells (Fig. 1B).
Fig. 1.
SEBOX mRNA expression in porcine tissues, oocytes and parthenogenetic embryos. (A) Semiquantitative RT-PCR analysis was performed on various porcine tissues to evaluate the relative expression of SEBOX. (B) SEBOX expression in porcine denuded oocytes (OO), granulosa cells (GC) and cumulus cells (CC). GDF9 and BMP15 were used as markers for oocytes, while FSHR was used as a marker for GC and CC. (C) SEBOX expression in porcine oocytes and different preimplantation development stages of parthenogenetically-activated embryos. GV, germinal vesicle; MII, meiosis II; 1C, 1 cell; 2C, 2 cells; 4C, 4 cells; 8C, 8 cells; MO, morula; BL, blastocyst. Expression was normalized to the expression level in GV oocytes. The data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Different letters indicate significant differences (P<0.05). GAPDH was used as an internal standard in all experiments.
Next, we investigated the expression of porcine SEBOX during oocyte and early embryo development (Fig. 1C). Porcine SEBOX was highly expressed in GV and MII oocytes, as well as in 1-cell to 4-cell embryos, with the highest expression at the 2-cell stage. SEBOX mRNA expression was dramatically reduced in the 8-cell and morula stages, and was barely detectable by the blastocyst stage in porcine embryos. Considering that EGA occurs at the 4-cell stage in porcine embryos [16], these results suggest that porcine SEBOX is a maternally expressed gene.
The functions of porcine SEBOX during meiotic maturation
To investigate the functions of SEBOX during porcine meiotic maturation, siRNAs specifically targeting porcine SEBOX mRNA were designed and microinjected into GV oocytes. Knockdown of SEBOX mRNA was confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR (Fig. 2A). Interestingly, oocytes depleted of SEBOX developed to the MII stage with normal polar body extrusion, and no morphological defects were observed (Fig. 2C). However, early embryonic development was significantly impaired when these oocytes were parthenogenetically activated (Fig. 2B). Collectively, these results suggest that SEBOX may play a role in embryonic development rather than in oocyte maturation.
Fig. 2.
The function of porcine SEBOX during meiotic maturation. DEPC water (sham-injected group) or SEBOX siRNA was injected into porcine oocytes at the GV stage. Non-injected oocytes were used as the control group. A: After 44 h of in vitro maturation, SEBOX mRNA levels of the control, sham-injected, and SEBOX RNAi groups were compared by qPCR. Expression was normalized to the expression level in the control group. GAPDH was used as an internal standard. The SEBOX mRNA level was greatly reduced in the RNAi group. B: Maturation and preimplantation developmental rates were compared among the control, sham-injected, and SEBOX RNAi groups. Cleavage, 4-cell and blastocyst rates were checked at 24 h, 48 h, and 7 days, respectively. C: Morphology of porcine MII oocytes and blastocysts in the control, sham-injected, and SEBOX RNAi groups. The numbers of oocytes used in this experiment are provided beside each group name, respectively. The data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Different letters indicate significant differences (P<0.05).
The roles of porcine SEBOX during early embryo development
To further investigate the role of SEBOX during early embryo development, SEBOX was knocked down at the pronuclear stage of porcine embryos (6–8 h after parthenogenetic activation). Efficient knockdown of SEBOX mRNA in embryos was confirmed by PCR (Fig. 3A). Consistent with our data showing that parthenogenetically activated oocytes with SEBOX knocked downed of SEBOX during meiotic maturation exhibited impaired embryonic development, SEBOX knockdown in the zygote significantly disrupted embryonic development, further confirming an essential role for SEBOX during early embryonic development (Fig. 3B, C).
Fig. 3.
The role of SEBOX during early development of porcine parthenogenetic embryos. DEPC water (sham-injected group) or SEBOX siRNA was injected into parthenogenetic embryos 6−8 h post activation (pronuclear stage). Non-injected embryos were used as controls. A: SEBOX mRNA levels were compared at the 2-cell stage. Expression was normalized to the level in the non-injected control group. GAPDH was used as an internal standard. SEBOX mRNA expression was suppressed in the RNAi group. B: Preimplantation developmental rates were compared among the control, sham-injected, and SEBOX RNAi groups. Cleavage, 4-cell and blastocyst rates were checked at 24 h, 48 h, and 7 days, respectively. C: Morphology of the parthenogenetic blastocysts in the control, sham-injected, and SEBOX RNAi groups. The numbers of embryos used in this experiment are provided beside each group name, respectively. The data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Different letters indicate significant differences (P<0.05).
SEBOX target genes during early embryo development
To dissect the molecular mechanisms underlying SEBOX function during embryonic development, we examined the expression levels of several maternally expressed genes that are essential for embryonic development. Surprisingly, all mRNA levels of maternally expressed genes examined (GDF9, BMP15, ZAR1, MOS and H1FOO) were higher than those in the control group (Fig. 4A). Furthermore, some genes involved in pluripotency, such as NANOG and SOX2, were also upregulated. By contrast, the expression of POU5F1 (also known as Oct4) and CDX2 was not affected by SEBOX knockdown (Fig. 4B). Given that no transcriptional activity is detected before the 4-cell stage in porcine embryos [16], it is likely that maternal mRNAs are not properly degraded in porcine embryos in which SEBOX has been knocked down.
Fig. 4.
Effect of SEBOX on expression of maternally expressed genes and pluripotent genes in porcine parthenogenetic embryos. DEPC water (sham-injected group) or SEBOX siRNA was injected into parthenogenetic embryos at the 1-cell stage. Non-injected embryos were used as controls. A: Expression levels of the maternally expressed genes ZAR1, GDF9, BMP15, MOS, and H1FOO were compared at the 4-cell stage. B: Expression levels of pluripotent-related genes were compared at the blastocyst stage. Expression was normalized to the level in the non-injected control group. GAPDH was used as an internal standard. The data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Different letters indicate significant differences (P<0.05).
Discussion
SEBOX is a maternally derived transcription factor that plays an important role in oogenesis, as well as in early embryo development [15, 17]. However, depletion of SEBOX in GV oocytes did not affect meiotic maturation of porcine oocytes, consistent with results from mouse oocytes [15], indicating that SEBOX is not required for transcription during meiotic maturation. Instead, SEBOX may be important in the activation of zygotic gene expression after fertilization. In this regard, it is not surprising that some transcripts are actively translated at the MII stage, although their transcript levels decrease during meiotic maturation. Indeed, genome-wide analysis of transcripts in mouse oocytes revealed that a number of transcripts dormant in the GV stage are actively recruited to polysomes to be translated at the MII stage [18]. These proteins are more likely to be required for embryonic development than for meiotic maturation. Therefore, it is of interest to determine whether SEBOX protein accumulates during meiotic maturation, even though Sebox transcript levels decrease by the MII stage in mouse oocytes [15].
The control of early development is dependent upon tight regulation of gene activity. At the time of EGA, transcription is under the control of maternally inherited factors. To prevent aberrant expression of genes normally transcribed at, or soon after EGA, the activity of these maternal transcription factors must be tightly regulated. In most cases, maternally-derived mRNAs are degraded as embryonic transcripts begin to be transcribed [19]. This prepares the embryo for later developmental events and is essential for embryo survival. However, knockdown of SEBOX led to the upregulation of many transcripts encoding maternal factors. Because there is no transcriptional activity before the 4-cell stage of porcine embryos [16], maternal mRNAs derived from oocytes may remain intact when SEBOX is knocked down. Although SEBOX has been identified as a transcription factor, the protein seems to have an additional role in stabilizing certain mRNAs. It is also possible that SEBOX regulates the expression of miRNAs that target maternal transcripts. Indeed, when Ago2, one of the major components of miRNA-mediated RNA silencing, is knocked down at the pronuclear stage, embryos arrest at the 2-cell stage, primarily as the result of a failure to degrade maternal mRNAs [20]. Moreover, miRNA-196a is highly expressed at the time of EGA in bovine embryos, and binds and thereby degrades maternal transcripts encoding NOBOX [21]. Moreover, we could not exclude the possibility that the length of poly(A) may be affected by SEBOX knockdown. In SEBOX-depleted embryos, the prolonged expression of maternal genes that are normally degraded or replaced by embryonic genes upon EGA may either interfere with the timing of activation of embryonic genes or may compete with embryonic genes that have been expressed. Disruption of the balance in expression between maternal and embryonic genes delays or inhibits the normal development of pig embryos. In the Xenopus, persistent expression of maternal c-mos, which is normally degraded soon after fertilization, delayed the onset of embryonic cell cycles [22]. In addition, some maternal factors may play a role in switching on embryonic gene expression, including genes involved in pluripotency. Thus, the excessive levels of maternal factors induced by SEBOX depletion may induce overexpression of pluripotency genes, such as SOX2 and NANOG. POU5F1 and NANOG are indeed downregulated when NOBOX is downregulated during early embryonic development as well as oogenesis [12, 14].
In conclusion, our data demonstrate that porcine SEBOX is an essential maternal factor that regulates early embryonic development. Maternal factors may activate certain genes in embryos during EGA. These genes may have a specific role within the embryo, perhaps as activators for transcription of genes essential for subsequent development. Considering the role of SEBOX in the induction of downstream transcription factors, SEBOX is a logical candidate to participate in EGA. It is important to identify genes involved in EGA to clarify the basic mechanisms controlling cell proliferation and differentiation during early embryo development. This knowledge could lead to improvements in embryo culture systems, transgenics and cloning, and would potentially provide a marker for viable embryos for transfer or freezing.
Acknowledgment
This study was supported by grants from the Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program (No. PJ009594 and PJ00956302), Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.
References
- 1.Li L, Zheng P, Dean J. Maternal control of early mouse development. Development 2010; 137: 859–870 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Schultz RM. The molecular foundations of the maternal to zygotic transition in the preimplantation embryo. Hum Reprod Update 2002; 8: 323–331 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hamatani T, Carter MG, Sharov AA, Ko MS. Dynamics of global gene expression changes during mouse preimplantation development. Dev Cell 2004; 6: 117–131 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bultman SJ, Gebuhr TC, Pan H, Svoboda P, Schultz RM, Magnuson T. Maternal BRG1 regulates zygotic genome activation in the mouse. Genes Dev 2006; 20: 1744–1754 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Burns KH, Viveiros MM, Ren Y, Wang P, DeMayo FJ, Frail DE, Eppig JJ, Matzuk MM. Roles of NPM2 in chromatin and nucleolar organization in oocytes and embryos. Science 2003; 300: 633–636 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Payer B, Saitou M, Barton SC, Thresher R, Dixon JP, Zahn D, Colledge WH, Carlton MB, Nakano T, Surani MA. Stella is a maternal effect gene required for normal early development in mice. Curr Biol 2003; 13: 2110–2117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tong ZB, Gold L, Pfeifer KE, Dorward H, Lee E, Bondy CA, Dean J, Nelson LM. Mater, a maternal effect gene required for early embryonic development in mice. Nat Genet 2000; 26: 267–268 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wu X, Viveiros MM, Eppig JJ, Bai Y, Fitzpatrick SL, Matzuk MM. Zygote arrest 1 (Zar1) is a novel maternal-effect gene critical for the oocyte-to-embryo transition. Nat Genet 2003; 33: 187–191 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.McGinnis W, Krumlauf R. Homeobox genes and axial patterning. Cell 1992; 68: 283–302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Choi Y, Ballow DJ, Xin Y, Rajkovic A. Lim homeobox gene, lhx8, is essential for mouse oocyte differentiation and survival. Biol Reprod 2008; 79: 442–449 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pangas SA, Choi Y, Ballow DJ, Zhao Y, Westphal H, Matzuk MM, Rajkovic A. Oogenesis requires germ cell-specific transcriptional regulators Sohlh1 and Lhx8. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103: 8090–8095 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rajkovic A, Pangas SA, Ballow D, Suzumori N, Matzuk MM. NOBOX deficiency disrupts early folliculogenesis and oocyte-specific gene expression. Science 2004; 305: 1157–1159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Moreno DL, Salazar Z, Betancourt M, Casas E, Ducolomb Y, Gonzalez C, Bonilla E. Sebox plays an important role during the early mouse oogenesis in vitro. Zygote 2012; 18: 1–5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tripurani SK, Lee KB, Wang L, Wee G, Smith GW, Lee YS, Latham KE, Yao J. A novel functional role for the oocyte-specific transcription factor newborn ovary homeobox (NOBOX) during early embryonic development in cattle. Endocrinology 2011; 152: 1013–1023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kim KH, Kim EY, Lee KA. SEBOX is essential for early embryogenesis at the two-cell stage in the mouse. Biol Reprod 2008; 79: 1192–1201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jarrell VL, Day BN, Prather RS. The transition from maternal to zygotic control of development occurs during the 4-cell stage in the domestic pig, Sus scrofa: quantitative and qualitative aspects of protein synthesis. Biol Reprod 1991; 44: 62–68 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cinquanta M, Rovescalli AC, Kozak CA, Nirenberg M. Mouse Sebox homeobox gene expression in skin, brain, oocytes, and two-cell embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97: 8904–8909 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chen J, Melton C, Suh N, Oh JS, Horner K, Xie F, Sette C, Blelloch R, Conti M. Genome-wide analysis of translation reveals a critical role for deleted in azoospermia-like (Dazl) at the oocyte-to-zygote transition. Genes Dev 2011; 25: 755–766 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tadros W, Lipshitz HD. The maternal-to-zygotic transition: a play in two acts. Development 2009; 136: 3033–3042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lykke-Andersen K, Gilchrist MJ, Grabarek JB, Das P, Miska E, Zernicka-Goetz M. Maternal Argonaute 2 is essential for early mouse development at the maternal-zygotic transition. Mol Biol Cell 2008; 19: 4383–4392 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tripurani SK, Lee KB, Wee G, Smith GW, Yao J. MicroRNA-196a regulates bovine newborn ovary homeobox gene (NOBOX) expression during early embryogenesis. BMC Dev Biol 2011; 11: 25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Murakami MS, Vande WG. Analysis of the early embryonic cell cycles of Xenopus; regulation of cell cycle length by Xe-wee1 and Mos. Development 1998; 125: 237–248 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]