Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 25.
Published in final edited form as: N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 17;368(3):291–293. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1215469

Human Borrelia miyamotoi Infection in the United States

Peter J Krause, Sukanya Narasimhan, Gary P Wormser, Lindsay Rollend, Erol Fikrig, Timothy Lepore, Alan Barbour, Durland Fish
PMCID: PMC3934646  NIHMSID: NIHMS554108  PMID: 23323920

To the Editor:

Borrelia miyamotoi, a spirochete that is genetically related to species of Borrelia that cause relapsing fever, has been detected in all tick species that are vectors of Lyme disease.1,2 It was detected in Ixodes scapularis ticks from Connecticut in 2001 and subsequently has been detected in all areas of the United States where Lyme disease is endemic. The first human cases of B. miyamotoi infection were reported in Russia in 2011.3 We now provide evidence of B. miyamotoi infection and of the prevalence of B. miyamotoi infection among people in the United States.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and confirmatory Western blot assays of archived serum samples obtained from three groups of patients who were living in areas where Lyme disease was endemic between 1990 and 2010 were used to detect antibody against B. miyamotoi GlpQ protein (an antigen that is nonreactive to B. burgdorferi antibody). 4 Group 1 consisted of 584 patients who participated in serologic surveys for tick-borne infections on Block Island and Prudence Island, Rhode Island, and Brimfield, Massachusetts. Patients in the serologic survey were healthy at the time of blood sampling and were enrolled during the spring and autumn of each year. Group 2 included 277 patients from southern New England who were evaluated for suspected Lyme disease. Group 3 consisted of 14 patients from southern New York who were evaluated at a Lyme disease clinic with a viral-like illness in the late spring or summer; these patients did not have symptoms or signs suggestive of an upper respiratory tract infection or gastroenteritis.

The seroprevalence was 1% in group 1, 3.2% in group 2, and 21% in group 3 (P<0.001 for comparison across the 3 groups). In one patient in group 2 and two patients in group 3, the antibody titer was at least four times as high in the convalescent serum samples as in the acute serum samples; these findings suggest that these patients were recently infected with B. miyamotoi (Table 1). All symptomatic patients presented with a viral-like illness and were treated with doxycycline or amoxicillin Unlike the patient with well documented B. miyamotoi infection described by Gugliotta et al. 5 elsewhere in this issue of the Journal, none of the 3 patients with evidence of recent B. miyamotoi infection in our study were immunocompromised. One patient had B. miyamotoi seroconversion and no erythema migrans skin lesion or laboratory evidence of human granulocytic anaplasmosis coinfection (Patient 17). This patient had a temperature of 39.4°C, chills, sweats, a headache, neck stiffness, fatigue, myalgias, arthralgias, abdominal pain, cough, sore throat, and right inguinal lymphadenopathy. He was treated successfully with 14 days of doxycycline. The identification of B. miyamotoi antibody in 18 of our study patients, including seroconversion associated with symptoms in three patients, suggests that B. miyamotoi infection may be prevalent in areas where Lyme disease is endemic in the United States.

Table 1.

Serologic and Clinical Characteristics of Borrelia miyamotoi Infection in Study Patients*

Group, Patient No., and
Serum Phase
Assay method Coinfection No. of
symptoms
ELISA Western blot
IgM IgG
Group 1
 Patient 1 Positive at 1:320 dilution Positive Positive None None
 Patient 2 Positive at 1:320 dilution Positive Negative None None
 Patient 3 Positive at 1:320 dilution Positive Positive None None
 Patient 4 Positive at ≥1:320 dilution§ Not done Positive None None
 Patient 5 Positive at ≥1:320 dilution§ Not done Positive None None
 Patient 6 Positive at 1:320 dilution Positive Positive None None
Group 2
 Patient 7 Positive at ≥1:320 dilution§ Not done Positive None 5
 Patient 8 Positive at 1:320 dilution Negative Positive None 9
 Patient 9 Positive at 1:320 dilution Negative Positive None 8
 Patient 10 Positive at ≥1:320 dilution§ Not done Positive None 6
 Patient 11 Positive at ≥1:320 dilution§ Not done Positive None 3
 Patient 12 Positive at 1:1280 dilution Negative Positive Lyme disease 4
 Patient 13 Positive at 1:320 dilution Negative Positive Lyme disease Uncertain
 Patient 14 Positive at 1:320 dilution Positive Positive Lyme disease Uncertain
 Patient 15
  Acute Negative at 1:160 dilution Negative Negative Babesiosis 12
  Convalescent Positive at 1:1280 dilution Positive Positive
Group 3
 Patient 16 Positive at 1:1280 dilution Positive Positive None 5
 Patient 17
  Acute negative at 1:80 dilution Positive negative None 10
  Convalescent Positive at 1:320 dilution Positive Positive
 Patient 18
  Acute negative at 1:80 dilution Positive Positive Lyme disease 12
  Convalescent Positive at 1:320 dilution Negative Positive
*

ELISA denotes enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

See text for the definition of various groups

The diagnosis of Lyme disease was based on a typical erythema migrans skin lesion in Patients 12, 13, 14, and 18. Patients 8 and 16 had an atypical erythema migrans skin lesion (<5 cm in diameter).

Tests to determine the presence of antibody in serum dilutions greater than 1:320 were not performed.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Grant Number R21AI088079 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases at the National Institutes of Health (PJK, DF). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases or the National Institutes of Health. Additional support was provided by the Gordon and Llura Gund Foundation (PJK), the G. Harold and Leila Y. Mathers Foundation (DF), and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (EF).

References

  • 1.Fukunaga M, Takahashi Y, Tsuruta Y, et al. Genetic and phenotypic analysis of Borrelia miyamotoi sp. nov., isolated from the ixodid tick Ixodes persulcatus, the vector for Lyme disease in Japan. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1995;45:804–10. doi: 10.1099/00207713-45-4-804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Scoles GA, Papero M, Beati L, Fish D. A relapsing fever group spirochete transmitted by Ixodes scapularis ticks. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2001;1:21–34. doi: 10.1089/153036601750137624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Platonov AE, Karan LS, Kolyasnikova NM, et al. Humans infected with the relapsing fever spirochete Borrelia miyamotoi, Russia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:1816–23. doi: 10.3201/eid1710.101474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Schwan TG, Schrumpf ME, Hinnebusch BJ, Anderson DE, Konkel ME. GlpQ: an antigen for serological discrimination between relapsing fever and Lyme borreliosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34:2483–92. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.10.2483-2492.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gugliotta JL, Goethert HK, Berardi VP, Telford SR. Meningoencephalitis due to Borrelia miyamotoi in an elderly immunocompromised patient. N Engl J Med. 2013;368 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209039. xx. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES