Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 26.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Res. 2012 Oct 26;111(10):1253–1255. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.112.278721

A Twist on Quantification: Measuring the Site Occupancy of S-nitrosylation

Christopher I Murray 1, Jennifer E Van Eyk 1,2
PMCID: PMC3936246  NIHMSID: NIHMS418273  PMID: 23104874

The use of mass spectrometry (MS) as a tool to study proteins and their post-translational modifications (PTMs) is gaining wider acceptance by the cardiovascular research community. A unique advantage of MS is the potential for large-scale quantitative analysis of protein abundance between biological samples. Several techniques have been developed for this purpose (see Supplement Table 1), some of which have been adapted for PTMs. The MS analysis of any PTM can be significantly enhanced if it is preceded by a chemical or immune-affinity enrichment strategy targeting a PTMs’ unique physical property. For example, phosphorylation can be enriched by exploiting its negative charge, classically using a positive charged metal affinity column, while acetylation can be enriched using antibodies against it’s acetyl group. A number of strategies have also been developed to examine Cys modifications, including S-nitrosylation (SNO, also known as S-nitrosation).1-6 The most widely used of these techniques is the biotin switch assay.7 This assay was initially presented as a method for the enrichment and identification of SNO-modified proteins but has evolved into a powerful and flexible technique to identify and quantify many different oxidative (ox)-PTMs. Advances in the configuration of this assay have allowed researchers to progress from straightforward protein level identifications to the individual modified amino acid and then, to site-specific quantification (Figure 1).8-12 A key factor in the improvement of this approach has been the introduction of isotopic labeled thiol-reactive affinity tags (see Supplement Table 1). These reagents have permitted the simultaneous MS analysis of 2 or more samples to measure differences in Cys-modification at individual residues.

Figure 1. Options for the analysis of oxidative posttranslational modifications using variations of the biotin switch assay.

Figure 1

The current state of redox-proteomics has an array of options to evaluate a biological sample’s redox-state. Basic analysis can determine the modified proteins8,32 more refined approaches provide the modified proteins and the position of each effected amino acid residue,9,33 while the most advanced techniques determine the modified residue and provide relative quantification.10-13,23,34 For SNO-modified proteins, quantification protocols have been applied to compare the redox-state of residues between biological samples, determine individual thiol-reactivity and now, individual thiol-occupancy. The development of these tools, and others, is invaluable to understanding the mechanisms of cellular redox-regulation.

In the elegant study by Murphy et al, this group combined the classic biotin switch assay with the isotopic cysteine-reactive tandem mass tag (CysTMT) reagent to not only identify specific Cys residues that were SNO-modified in the heart but also determine the occupancy of SNO-modification for each site.13 The use of thiol-reactive isotopic mass tags is not new. The earliest isotope-coded affinity tags (ICAT), were developed by Aebersold’s group14 and reacted with free thiol groups; however, these were conceived of for general protein quantification, rather than the targeted analysis of Cys PTMs. Richard Cohen’s group first pursued a Cys specific application of ICAT in cardiac muscle in order to investigate the extent of oxidative Cys modifications upon peroxide treatment.15 CysTMT tags are the most recent development in thiol-targeted isotopic mass tags and can be multiplexed with up to 6 different samples in a single MS analysis.12 More recently our group, in collaboration with Thermo-Fisher, were the first to combine CysTMT with the biotin switch approach and successfully quantified individual thiol-reactivity to SNO-modifications.12 Measurement of thiol-reactivity to SNO-modification provided a unique look into the hierarchy of which Cys become modified under increasing oxidative stimuli. What is novel in the current paper is the Murphy group’s use of the CysTMT reagent (a light and heavy isotopic version) to determine the extent of SNO-modification at each Cys.13 This exciting twist allowed them to determine each site’s SNO-occupancy - the ratio (or percentage) of the SNO modified and unmodified form. Site occupancy is an extremely important aspect of quantification that is often overlooked, in part because there are few tools available that allow this type of information to be gathered. Yet, knowing the occupancy of SNO for each modifiable Cys residue is, in our opinion, key to understanding the role of these modifications and should be part of all future studies involving SNO. In fact, site occupancy should be a goal for all PTM studies, not just for SNO.

Why is site occupancy so critical? It is clear that many amino acid residues can undergo post-translational modification – 100 to 1000s of sites being modified at any given time (e.g. phosphorylation16-18 and acetylation19-21). The extent of site occupancy will vary at each modified residue and many will be present in a sample at a very low percentage. In these cases, when investigating changes in PTM status following a stimulation or treatment, the current method of quantifying fold changes can be misleading. For example, a low occupancy site (< 1%) may increase 5-fold upon I/RP to <5% occupancy, while the same 5-fold increase to a site with moderate occupancy (20%) would result in 100% occupancy. Conversely, a site already 50% occupied cannot increase by more than 2-fold. Fold change analysis without assessing site occupancy, may not reveal the most biologically important modifications sites.

Determination of site occupancy is also advantageous when multiple PTMs occur to the same amino acid residue. Thus, the extent of site occupancy for each PTM is critical for determining the contribution of the various competing PTMs at a given Cys residue. It is already clear from the literature that there are specific Cys residues that can have a plural modification status.22,23 To date, this type of analysis has not yet to be performed but quantitative information dissecting the extent of each Cys PTM will be key, particularly to support the emerging concept that SNO is protective against other more damaging Cys oxPTMs. One of the current limitations in the field is that relative quantitation does not allow to compare the levels of PTM at multiple Cys residues in different proteins. The different ionization efficiency of peptides requires absolute quantification of the unmodified and modified residue (mole:mole) to compare the extent of modification at different sites. Absolute quantification using MS is achieved using multiple reaction monitoring (also termed selective reaction monitoring), where a known quantity of an isotopic labeled peptide is spiked into a sample and quantified based on a standard curve.24-27 This method has already been applied to quantify phosphorylated proteins (including mitochondria28 and cardiac TnI29) but its application to Cys-PTMs has been limited to semi-quantitative analysis rather than absolute quantification.30,31 We believe that with time and further development this approach will ultimately be the future of PTM quantitative analysis.

Until that time, the application of the CysTMT reagent to determine site occupancy for Cys PTMs is a very significant step in the right direction. Although there are still a number of technical and feasibility issues remaining (as outlined in their paper), Murphy and colleagues’ work demonstrates this approach is possible and has opened the door to a host of interesting insights into the biochemical effects of nitric oxide production, ischemia reperfusion injury in the heart and beyond.13

Supplementary Material

2

Acknowledgments

Sources of funding

This was funded by the American Heart Association Pre-Doctoral Fellowship 0815145E (CIM) and National Heart, Lung and Blood Institution: proteomic initiative contract NHLBI-HV-10-05(2)(JVE); PO1HL77189-01 (JVE).

Footnotes

Disclosures

Authors have no disclosures.

References

  • 1.Murray CI, Van Eyk JE. Chasing Cysteine Oxidative Modifications: Proteomic Tools for Characterizing Cysteine Redox-Status. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2012 doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.111.961425. In Press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bechtold E, King SB. Chemical methods for the direct detection and labeling of s-nitrosothiols. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2012;7:981–91. doi: 10.1089/ars.2012.4570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jacob C, Battaglia E, Burkholz T, Peng D, Bagrel D, Montenarh M. Control of oxidative posttranslational cysteine modifications: from intricate chemistry to widespread biological and medical applications. Chem Res Toxicol. 2012;3:588–604. doi: 10.1021/tx200342b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wang H, Xian M. Chemical methods to detect S-nitrosation. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2011;1:32–7. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2010.10.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chouchani ET, James AM, Fearnley IM, Lilley KS, Murphy MP. Proteomic approaches to the characterization of protein thiol modification. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2010;1:120–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2010.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Forrester MT, Foster MW, Benhar M, Stamler JS. Detection of protein S-nitrosylation with the biotin-switch technique. Free Radic Biol Med. 2009;2:119–26. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.09.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jaffrey SR, Snyder SH. The biotin switch method for the detection of S-nitrosylated proteins. Sci STKE. 2001;86:pl1. doi: 10.1126/stke.2001.86.pl1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jaffrey SR, Erdjument-Bromage H, Ferris CD, Tempst P, Snyder SH. Protein S-nitrosylation: a physiological signal for neuronal nitric oxide. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;2:193–7. doi: 10.1038/35055104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hao G, Derakhshan B, Shi L, Campagne F, Gross SS. SNOSID, a proteomic method for identification of cysteine S-nitrosylation sites in complex protein mixtures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;4:1012–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0508412103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Forrester MT, Thompson JW, Foster MW, Nogueira L, Moseley MA, Stamler JS. Proteomic analysis of S-nitrosylation and denitrosylation by resin-assisted capture. Nat Biotechnol. 2009;6:557–9. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Paige JS, Xu G, Stancevic B, Jaffrey SR. Nitrosothiol reactivity profiling identifies S-nitrosylated proteins with unexpected stability. Chem Biol. 2008;12:1307–16. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2008.10.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Murray CI, Uhrigshardt H, O'Meally RN, Cole RN, Van Eyk JE. Identification and quantification of S-nitrosylation by cysteine reactive tandem mass tag switch assay. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012;2 doi: 10.1074/mcp.M111.013441. M111 013441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kohr MJ, Aponte A, Sun J, Gucek M, Steenbergen C, Murphy E. Measurement of S-nitrosylation Occupancy in the Myocardium with Cysteine-reactive Tandem Mass Tags. Circ Res. 2012;111 doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.112.271320. xxx-xxx [in this issue] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gygi SP, Rist B, Gerber SA, Turecek F, Gelb MH, Aebersold R. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat Biotechnol. 1999;10:994–9. doi: 10.1038/13690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sethuraman M, McComb ME, Huang H, Huang S, Heibeck T, Costello CE, Cohen RA. Isotope-coded affinity tag (ICAT) approach to redox proteomics: identification and quantitation of oxidant-sensitive cysteine thiols in complex protein mixtures. J Proteome Res. 2004;6:1228–33. doi: 10.1021/pr049887e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lundby A, Secher A, Lage K, Nordsborg NB, Dmytriyev A, Lundby C, Olsen JV. Quantitative maps of protein phosphorylation sites across 14 different rat organs and tissues. Nat Commun. 2012:876. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Olsen JV, Blagoev B, Gnad F, Macek B, Kumar C, Mortensen P, Mann M. Global, in vivo, and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks. Cell. 2006;3:635–48. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Deng N, Zhang J, Zong C, Wang Y, Lu H, Yang P, Wang W, Young GW, Wang Y, Korge P, Lotz C, Doran P, Liem DA, Apweiler R, Weiss JN, Duan H, Ping P. Phosphoproteome analysis reveals regulatory sites in major pathways of cardiac mitochondria. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2011;2 doi: 10.1074/mcp.M110.000117. M110 000117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Choudhary C, Kumar C, Gnad F, Nielsen ML, Rehman M, Walther TC, Olsen JV, Mann M. Lysine acetylation targets protein complexes and co-regulates major cellular functions. Science. 2009;5942:834–40. doi: 10.1126/science.1175371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lundby A, Lage K, Weinert BT, Bekker-Jensen DB, Secher A, Skovgaard T, Kelstrup CD, Dmytriyev A, Choudhary C, Lundby C, Olsen JV. Proteomic analysis of lysine acetylation sites in rat tissues reveals organ specificity and subcellular patterns. Cell Rep. 2012;2:419–31. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.07.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mischerikow N, Heck AJ. Targeted large-scale analysis of protein acetylation. Proteomics. 2011;4:571–89. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201000397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wang SB, Murray CI, Chung HS, Van Eyk JE. Redox-regulation of mitochondrial ATP synthase. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2012 doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2012.08.005. In Press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kohr MJ, Sun J, Aponte A, Wang G, Gucek M, Murphy E, Steenbergen C. Simultaneous measurement of protein oxidation and S-nitrosylation during preconditioning and ischemia/reperfusion injury with resin-assisted capture. Circ Res. 2011;4:418–26. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.232173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Picotti P, Aebersold R. Selected reaction monitoring-based proteomics: workflows, potential, pitfalls and future directions. Nat Methods. 2012;6:555–66. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Shi T, Su D, Liu T, Tang K, Camp DG, 2nd, Qian WJ, Smith RD. Advancing the sensitivity of selected reaction monitoring-based targeted quantitative proteomics. Proteomics. 2012;8:1074–92. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201100436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Calvo E, Camafeita E, Fernandez-Gutierrez B, Lopez JA. Applying selected reaction monitoring to targeted proteomics. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2011;2:165–73. doi: 10.1586/epr.11.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fu Q, Schoenhoff FS, Savage WJ, Zhang P, Van Eyk JE. Multiplex assays for biomarker research and clinical application: translational science coming of age. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2010;3:271–84. doi: 10.1002/prca.200900217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lam MP, Scruggs SB, Kim TY, Zong C, Lau E, Wang D, Ryan CM, Faull KF, Ping P. An MRM-based workflow for quantifying cardiac mitochondrial protein phosphorylation in murine and human tissue. J Proteomics. 2012;15:4602–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.02.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhang P, Kirk JA, Ji W, dos Remedios CG, Kass DA, Van Eyk JE, Murphy AM. Multiple Reaction Monitoring to Identify Site-Specific Troponin I Phosphorylated Residues in the Failing Human Heart. Circulation. 2012 doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.096388. In Press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chen HJ, Chen YC. Reactive nitrogen oxide species-induced post-translational modifications in human hemoglobin and the association with cigarette smoking. Anal Chem. 2012;18:7881–90. doi: 10.1021/ac301597r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Held JM, Danielson SR, Behring JB, Atsriku C, Britton DJ, Puckett RL, Schilling B, Campisi J, Benz CC, Gibson BW. Targeted quantitation of site-specific cysteine oxidation in endogenous proteins using a differential alkylation and multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry approach. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2010;7:1400–10. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M900643-MCP200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Santhanam L, Gucek M, Brown TR, Mansharamani M, Ryoo S, Lemmon CA, Romer L, Shoukas AA, Berkowitz DE, Cole RN. Selective fluorescent labeling of S-nitrosothiols (S-FLOS): a novel method for studying S-nitrosation. Nitric Oxide. 2008;3:295–302. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2008.07.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Huang B, Chen C. Detection of protein S-nitrosation using irreversible biotinylation procedures (IBP) Free Radic Biol Med. 2010;3:447–56. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhang X, Huang B, Zhou X, Chen C. Quantitative proteomic analysis of S-nitrosated proteins in diabetic mouse liver with ICAT switch method. Protein Cell. 2010;7:675–87. doi: 10.1007/s13238-010-0087-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

2

RESOURCES