Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology Communications
. 2014 Jan 21;70(Pt 2):190–192. doi: 10.1107/S2053230X13033906

Crystallization and preliminary X-ray characterization of MutT2, MSMEG_5148 from Mycobacterium smegmatis

S M Arif a, P B Sang b, U Varshney b, M Vijayan a,*
PMCID: PMC3936434  PMID: 24637753

MutT2, MSMEG_5148 from M. smegmatis, has been crystallized and the crystals have been characterized using X-ray diffraction.

Keywords: MutT2, Mycobacterium smegmatis

Abstract

Crystallization of MutT2, MSMEG_5148 from Mycobacterium smegmatis, has been carried out and the crystals have been characterized using X-ray diffraction. Matthews coefficient calculation suggests the possibility of one protein molecule in the asymmetric unit of the orthorhombic unit cell, space group P21212 or P2122. Solution of the structure of the protein by molecular replacement using the known three-dimensional structure of a bacterial Nudix hydrolase is envisaged.

1. Introduction  

Excessive accumulation of non-canonical nucleotides such as oxidatively damaged nucleoside triphosphates (NTPs) and deoxynucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs) in the nucleotide pool impairs the fidelity of DNA replication and RNA transcription (Nakabeppu et al., 2010). These non-canonical nucleotides are generated by the reactive oxygen species and reactive nitrogen intermediates produced during cellular metabolism (Wink et al., 1991; Cooke et al., 2003; Kurthkoti et al., 2008). If not sanitized, they may be incorporated into DNA during replication, resulting in ambiguous base pairing, leading to the subsequent accumulation of mutations.

In addition to DNA-repair mechanisms, cells have also developed an elaborate enzymatic system that sanitizes non-canonical nucleoside triphosphates from the nucleotide pool by hydrolyzing them to the corresponding diphosphates or monophosphates and hence avoiding their misincorporation into DNA or RNA (Zhang et al., 2013). MutT-like proteins which perform this function have been extensively studied (Bessman et al., 1996). They belong to the Nudix hydrolases, a superfamily of Mg2+-requiring enzymes that are ubiquitous in nature and are found in all classes of organisms and catalyze the hydrolysis of nucleoside diphosphate linked to other moieties, X (Mildvan et al., 2005; McLennan, 2006). It has been reported that the genome of Mycobacterium smegmatis encodes four putative Nudix hydrolases, MutT1, MutT2, MutT3 and MutT4, that correspond to Escherichia coli MutT (Cole et al., 1998; Dos Vultos et al., 2006; Davis & Forse, 2009). Previous studies have shown that MutT1 and MutT2 have 8-oxo-guanosine triphosphatase activity (Dos Vultos et al., 2006; Patil et al., 2013). However, recent studies indicate that M. smegmatis MutT2 (MsMutT2) hydrolyzes dCTP more efficiently than 8-oxo-dGTP and 8-oxo-GTP (Sang & Varshney, 2013). It also hydrolyzes 5-methyl-dCTP (Sang & Varshney, 2013). Thus, inside mycobacteria MsMutT2 plays a role in hydrolyzing non-canonical nucleotides such as 8-oxo-dGTP, 8-oxo-GTP and 5-methyl dCTP and may have a regulatory role in maintaining the physiological levels of canonical dCTP. This dual functionality of the enzyme is still unexplained and the regulation of the two enzymatic activities has yet to be explored. Here, we report the crystallization and preliminary X-ray studies of MutT2 from M. smegmatis (MsMutT2) in a continuation of our ongoing structural studies of various mycobacterial proteins (Vijayan, 2005; Krishna et al., 2007; Selvaraj et al., 2007; Roy et al., 2008; Kaushal et al., 2008; Prabu et al., 2009; Chetnani et al., 2010; Arif et al., 2012; Abhinav et al., 2013).

2. Materials and methods  

2.1. Crystallization  

MsMutT2 was cloned, overproduced and purified as reported previously (Sang & Varshney, 2013). Crystallization conditions were explored using kits commercially available from Hampton Research employing the microbatch-under-oil method. Diffraction-quality thin rectangular crystals (Fig. 1) of the protein grew in about 5 d in a drop consisting of 2 µl of 25 mg ml−1 protein solution in 0.020 M Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 0.150 M NaCl, 10%(v/v) glycerol, 0.002 M β-mercaptoethanol and 2 µl crystallant solution consisting of 0.1 M MES monohydrate pH 6.0, 20%(v/v) Jeffamine M-600 pH 7.0.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Crystals of MsMutT2.

2.2. X-ray data collection and processing  

Initially, intensity data were collected at a home source to a resolution of 1.76 Å using a MAR345 detector mounted on a Bruker MICROSTAR ULTRA II Cu Kα rotating-anode X-ray generator. Subsequently, high-resolution diffraction data were collected from a single crystal with dimensions of around 0.7 × 0.05 × 0.01 mm on synchrotron X-ray beamline BM14 (tuned for maximum flux at 0.8266 Å with a 150 µm beam aperture and equipped with a CCD detector) at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, France. No cryoprotectant was required for data collection at 100 K. The intensity data were processed and merged using iMosflm (Battye et al., 2011) and SCALA (Evans, 1993) in the CCP4 program suite (Winn et al., 2011). Structure-factor amplitudes were obtained from intensities using TRUNCATE (French & Wilson, 1978) from the CCP4 program suite. The crystal parameters, data-collection parameters and processing statistics are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Data-collection and processing statistics.

Values in parentheses are for the outermost resolution shell.

No. of crystals 1
X-ray source BM14, ESRF
Wavelength (Å) 0.8266
Detector MAR 225 CCD
Crystal-to-detector distance (mm) 101.7
Rotation range per image (°) 1
Total rotation range (°) 240
Exposure time per image (s) 3
Resolution range (Å) 16.46–1.10 (1.16–1.10)
Space group P21212 or P2122
Unit-cell parameters (Å) a = 65.84, b = 59.87, c = 31.50
Average mosaicity (°) 0.70
Total No. of measured intensities 443305 (60456)
Total No. of unique reflections 49097 (6891)
Multiplicity 9.0 (8.8)
Mean I/σ(I) 16.0 (3.0)
Completeness (%) 95.9 (93.4)
R merge (%) 6.2 (77.0)
R meas (%) 6.6 (81.7)

R merge = Inline graphic Inline graphic.

R meas = Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic, where Ii(hkl) is the ith intensity measurement of reflection with indices hkl and 〈I (hkl)〉 is the weighted average intensity of all i intensity measurements of reflection with indices hkl.

3. Results and discussion  

MutT2 from M. smegmatis has been crystallized and the crystals were characterized using X-ray diffraction. The crystals belonged to space group P21212 or P2122 as indicated by symmetry and systematic absences, with unit-cell parameters a = 65.84, b = 59.87, c = 31.50 Å. A value of 1.94 Å3 Da−1 for the Matthews coefficient suggests the possibility of one protein molecule in the asymmetric unit of the orthorhombic unit cell (Matthews, 1968).

Among proteins of known three-dimensional structure, the E. coli Orf135 protein (PDB entry 2rrk; K. Kawasaki & M. Mishima, unpublished work) exhibits the maximum sequence identity to the sequence of MsMutT2. The values of identity and similarity are 37.5% and 51.4%, respectively. Structure solution of MsMutT2 using molecular replacement with the known solution structure of E. coli Orf135 protein, a CTP diphosphatase (PDB entry 2rrk), as the search model is envisaged.

Acknowledgments

Intensity data were collected at the X-ray Facility for Protein Crystal Structure Determination and Protein Design at the Indian Institute of Science, supported by the Department of Science and Technology (DST), and on beamline (BM14) of the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility at Grenoble, France, access to which was arranged by the Department of Biotechnology (DBT). SMA and PBS are Senior Research Fellows of the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research and MV is Albert Einstein Professor of the Indian National Science Academy (INSA). The financial support of the DBT is acknowledged.

References

  1. Abhinav, K. V., Sharma, A. & Vijayan, M. (2013). Proteins, 81, 644–657. [DOI] [PubMed]
  2. Arif, S. M., Patil, A. G., Varshney, U. & Vijayan, M. (2012). Acta Cryst. F68, 1214–1216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  3. Battye, T. G. G., Kontogiannis, L., Johnson, O., Powell, H. R. & Leslie, A. G. W. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 271–281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  4. Bessman, M. J., Frick, D. N. & O’Handley, S. F. (1996). J. Biol. Chem. 271, 25059–25062. [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Chetnani, B., Kumar, P., Surolia, A. & Vijayan, M. (2010). J. Mol. Biol. 400, 171–185. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Cole, S. T. et al. (1998). Nature (London), 393, 537–544.
  7. Cooke, M. S., Evans, M. D., Dizdaroglu, M. & Lunec, J. (2003). FASEB J. 17, 1195–1214. [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. Davis, E. O. & Forse, L. N. (2009). Mycobacterium: Genomics and Molecular Biology, edited by T. Parish & A. Brown, pp. 79–119. Poole: Caister Academic Press.
  9. Dos Vultos, T., Blázquez, J., Rauzier, J., Matic, I. & Gicquel, B. (2006). J. Bacteriol. 188, 3159–3161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  10. Evans, P. R. (1993). Proceedings of the CCP4 Study Weekend. Data Collection and Processing, edited by L. Sawyer, N. Isaacs & S. Bailey, pp. 114–122. Warrington: Daresbury Laboratory.
  11. French, S. & Wilson, K. (1978). Acta Cryst. A34, 517–525.
  12. Kaushal, P. S., Talawar, R. K., Krishna, P. D. V., Varshney, U. & Vijayan, M. (2008). Acta Cryst. D64, 551–560. [DOI] [PubMed]
  13. Krishna, R., Prabu, J. R., Manjunath, G. P., Datta, S., Chandra, N. R., Muniyappa, K. & Vijayan, M. (2007). J. Mol. Biol. 367, 1130–1144. [DOI] [PubMed]
  14. Kurthkoti, K., Kumar, P., Jain, R. & Varshney, U. (2008). Microbiology, 154, 2776–2785. [DOI] [PubMed]
  15. Matthews, B. W. (1968). J. Mol. Biol. 33, 491–497. [DOI] [PubMed]
  16. McLennan, A. G. (2006). Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 63, 123–143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  17. Mildvan, A. S., Xia, Z., Azurmendi, H. F., Saraswat, V., Legler, P. M., Massiah, M. A., Gabelli, S. B., Bianchet, M. A., Kang, L.-W. & Amzel, L. M. (2005). Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 433, 129–143. [DOI] [PubMed]
  18. Nakabeppu, Y., Oka, S., Sheng, Z., Tsuchimoto, D. & Sakumi, K. (2010). Mutat. Res. 703, 51–58. [DOI] [PubMed]
  19. Patil, A. G. G., Sang, P. B., Govindan, A. & Varshney, U. (2013). J. Biol. Chem. 288, 11252–11262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  20. Prabu, J. R., Thamotharan, S., Khanduja, J. S., Chandra, N. R., Muniyappa, K. & Vijayan, M. (2009). Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1794, 1001–1009. [DOI] [PubMed]
  21. Roy, S., Saraswathi, R., Chatterji, D. & Vijayan, M. (2008). J. Mol. Biol. 375, 948–959. [DOI] [PubMed]
  22. Sang, P. B. & Varshney, U. (2013). J. Bacteriol. 195, 1552–1560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  23. Selvaraj, M., Roy, S., Singh, N. S., Sangeetha, R., Varshney, U. & Vijayan, M. (2007). J. Mol. Biol. 372, 186–193. [DOI] [PubMed]
  24. Vijayan, M. (2005). Tuberculosis, 85, 357–366. [DOI] [PubMed]
  25. Wink, D. A., Kasprzak, K. S., Maragos, C. M., Elespuru, R. K., Misra, M., Dunams, T. M., Cebula, T. A., Koch, W. H., Andrews, A. W., Allen, J. S. & Keefer, L. J. (1991). Science, 254, 1001–1003. [DOI] [PubMed]
  26. Winn, M. D. et al. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 235–242.
  27. Zhang, Y., Ye, W. Y., Wang, J. Q., Wang, S. J., Ji, P., Zhou, G. Y., Zhao, G. P., Ge, H. L. & Wang, Y. (2013). Eur. J. Histochem. 57, e29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Acta Crystallographica. Section F, Structural Biology Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES