Abstract
Communication between individuals of a species is likely to increase the capacity to acquire skills useful for survival and propagation and thus may confer important selective advantages. Since interaction occurs between two or more individuals, the selective process is frequency dependent, and the analysis shows that communication cannot initially increase at a reasonable rate when it is limited to random unrelated individuals, so that it is likely to abort for stochastic reasons. However, this bottleneck is removed if the communication process takes place in the nuclear family or among close relatives or if aggregation of communicators occurs because of assortative mating or meeting. Use of the individual conditional fitnesses we have introduced earlier permits an exact analysis. We show that, in general, the initial rate of increase can be geometric if and only if, in the class of selective models considered, the conditional probability of a communicator interacting with another contains a positive constant term. In our discussion of communication, cost factors for the act of communication have been omitted. However, the model has been generalized to include cooperativeness, and also altruism, or competition, by introducing costs. There is a close relationship among these situations, and the same considerations about the initial bottleneck and its resolution also extend to them. The models given here are for haploids but they extend to diploids and the conclusions are similar.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Axelrod R., Hamilton W. D. The evolution of cooperation. Science. 1981 Mar 27;211(4489):1390–1396. doi: 10.1126/science.7466396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boorman S. A., Levitt P. R. Group selection on the boundary of a stable population. Theor Popul Biol. 1973 Mar;4(1):85–128. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(73)90007-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cohen D., Eshel I. On the founder effect and the evolution of altruistic traits. Theor Popul Biol. 1976 Dec;10(3):276–302. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(76)90020-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eshel I., Cavalli-Sforza L. L. Assortment of encounters and evolution of cooperativeness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Feb;79(4):1331–1335. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.4.1331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feldman M. W., Cavalli-Sforza L. L. Aspects of variance and covariance analysis with cultural inheritance. Theor Popul Biol. 1979 Jun;15(3):276–307. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(79)90043-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lewontin R., Kirk D., Crow J. Selective mating, assortative mating, and inbreeding: definitions and implications. Eugen Q. 1968 Jun;15(2):141–143. doi: 10.1080/19485565.1968.9987764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wright S. Systems of Mating. III. Assortative Mating Based on Somatic Resemblance. Genetics. 1921 Mar;6(2):144–161. doi: 10.1093/genetics/6.2.144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]