Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1983 Apr;80(7):2081–2085. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.7.2081

Acute transsynaptic regulation of tyrosine 3-monooxygenase activity in the rat superior cervical ganglion: evidence for both cholinergic and noncholinergic mechanisms.

N Y Ip, R L Perlman, R E Zigmond
PMCID: PMC393757  PMID: 6132384

Abstract

The rate of dopa synthesis in the rat superior cervical ganglion was increased 4- to 6-fold during continuous electrical stimulation of the cervical sympathetic trunk at 10 Hz for 30 min. This increase was only partially blocked by 3 mM hexamethonium and was not significantly affected by 6 microM atropine. In the presence of both hexamethonium and atropine, nerve stimulation still produced a 2- to 4-fold increase in dopa synthesis. Physostigmine increased dopa synthesis in both control and stimulated ganglia. This effect of physostigmine was completely blocked by hexamethonium and atropine. Dopa synthesis was also significantly increased when ganglia were incubated in a medium containing an elevated concentration of K+ (55 mM). This stimulatory effect of high K+ was totally dependent on the presence of Ca2+ in the medium, was decreased by 60% by prior decentralization of the ganglion, and was unaffected by hexamethonium and atropine. The data demonstrate that tyrosine hydroxylase activity is rapidly increased after preganglionic nerve stimulation and suggest that this increase is mediated in part by acetylcholine and in part by a second (noncholinergic) transmitter. The effects of an elevated K+ concentration may be mediated both by the release of a noncholinergic transmitter from the preganglionic nerve terminals and by direct depolarization of the ganglionic neurons.

Full text

PDF
2081

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chalfie M., Settipani L., Perlman R. L. The role of cyclic adenosine 3':5'-monophosphate in the regulation of tyrosine 3-monooxygenase activity. Mol Pharmacol. 1979 Mar;15(2):263–270. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Collier B. The preferential release of newly synthesized transmitter by a sympathetic ganglion. J Physiol. 1969 Nov;205(2):341–352. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Erny R. E., Berezo M. W., Perlman R. L. Activation of tyrosine 3-monooxygenase in pheochromocytoma cells by adenosine. J Biol Chem. 1981 Feb 10;256(3):1335–1339. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ikeno T., Dickens G., Lloyd T., Guroff G. The receptor-mediated activation of tyrosine hydroxylation in the superior cervical ganglion of the rat. J Neurochem. 1981 May;36(5):1632–1640. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1981.tb00413.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ip N. Y., Ho C. K., Zigmond R. E. Secretin and vasoactive intestinal peptide acutely increase tyrosine 3-monooxygenase in the rat superior cervical ganglion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Dec;79(23):7566–7569. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.23.7566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ip N. Y., Perlman R. L., Zigmond R. E. Both nicotinic and muscarinic agonists acutely increase tyrosine 3-monooxygenase activity in the superior cervical ganglion. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1982 Nov;223(2):280–283. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jan Y. N., Jan L. Y., Kuffler S. W. A peptide as a possible transmitter in sympathetic ganglia of the frog. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Mar;76(3):1501–1505. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.3.1501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jan Y. N., Jan L. Y., Kuffler S. W. Further evidence for peptidergic transmission in sympathetic ganglia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Aug;77(8):5008–5012. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.8.5008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kalix P., Roch P. Evidence of depolarization-induced cAMP increase in the superior cervical ganglion of several mammalian species. Gen Pharmacol. 1976 Sep;7(4):267–270. doi: 10.1016/0306-3623(76)90087-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. LARRABEE M. G., BRONK D. W. [Metabolic requirements of sympathetic neurons]. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1952;17:245–266. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1952.017.01.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Libet B. Generation of slow inhibitory and excitatory postsynaptic potentials. Fed Proc. 1970 Nov-Dec;29(6):1945–1956. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McIsaac R. J. Afterdischarge on postganglionic sympathetic nerves following repetitive stimulation of the preganglionic nerve to the rat superior cervical ganglion in vitro. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1977 Jan;200(1):107–116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nishi S., Koketsu K. Early and late after discharges of amphibian sympathetic ganglion cells. J Neurophysiol. 1968 Jan;31(1):109–121. doi: 10.1152/jn.1968.31.1.109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Quenzer L. F., Patterson B. A., Volle R. L. The cyclic nucleotide content of the rat superior cervical ganglion. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1980 Nov;215(2):297–303. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Quenzer L., Yahn D., Alkadhi K., Volle R. L. Transmission blockade and stimulation of ganglionic adenylate cyclase by catecholamines. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1979 Jan;208(1):31–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Raisman G., Field P. M., Ostberg A. J., Iversen L. L., Zigmond R. E. A quantitative ultrastructural and biochemical analysis of the process of reinnervation of the superior cervical ganglion in the adult rat. Brain Res. 1974 May 10;71(1):1–16. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(74)90187-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Steinberg M. I., Keller C. E. Enhanced catecholamine synthesis in isolated rat superior cervical ganglia caused by nerve stimulation: dissociation between ganglionic transmission and catecholamine synthesis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1978 Feb;204(2):384–399. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Volle R. L., Patterson B. A. Regulation of cyclic AMP accumulation in a rat sympathetic ganglion: effects of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide. J Neurochem. 1982 Oct;39(4):1195–1197. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1982.tb11516.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES