Abstract
The aim of this prospective study design is to understand the audiological parameters in central and peripheral auditory pathway in organophosphorus compound (OPC) poisoning, within the setting of Tertiary care/Medical College Hospital we studied Distortion Product Oto Acoustic Emission (DPOAE) and brain evoked response audiometry (BERA) in 25 patients with OPC poisoning with respiratory failure and 75 patients without respiratory failure. The results showed that DPOAE was absent in 17 patients with respiratory failure and 51 patients without respiratory failure. BERA showed significant prolongation in wave I, wave III and wave V latencies in both the groups. In conclusion, the current study has demonstrated significant changes in the auditory pathway both in peripheral and central with OPC exposure. The damage induced by these agents has been suggested as a combination of oto- and neurotoxicity with or without respiratory failure. Otolaryngologist should be alert to the toxic properties of OPC and conduct a comprehensive audiological assessment even in the conditions of deliberate poisoning.
Keywords: Organophosphorus compound, Distortion product otoacoustic emission, Brainstem evoked response audiometry, Ototoxicity and neurotoxicity, Sensorineural hearing loss
Introduction
Organophosphorus compound (OPC) poisoning is a grave problem among rural population handling these compounds either by farmers or traders of insecticides. It is a occupational hazard. Especially among farmers it is a social problem. Psychiatric illness and deliberate OPC poisoning has received considerable attention [1]. There has been very few or no studies regarding audiological assessment in patients with OPC poisoning. The present study is a prospective analysis of the auditory functions in patients diagnosed with OPC poisoning.
Aim
The aim is to study the effect of OPC poisoning on the auditory pathway.
Material and Methods
It is a prospective observational study. The study group included 100 patients of OPC poisoning, out of which, 25 cases of OPC poisoning had respiratory failure and the remaining 75 patients were without respiratory failure. The patients were referred from the Department of Medicine after treatment and were later worked up in the Department of Oto laryngology. They were grouped in two groups viz study group and control group.
The study group is as follows:
- Inclusion criteria
Age <45 years.
- Exclusion criteria
H/o hearing loss, previous causes of middle or inner ear disease, chronic medical illness.
The control group consisted of age and gender matched normal healthy subjects.
A detailed medical and otological history and physical, otolaryngological and neuro otological examination was done in all patients.
Each of these cases was then subjected to puretone audiometry, Distortion Product Oto Acoustic Emission (DPOAE) and brain evoked response audiometry (BERA).
Pure tone audiometry was done using MAICO MA 53 audiometer with TDH 39 head phones.
Impedance audiometry was done using MADSEN ZODIAC instrument and DPOAE and BERA were measured using HIS software with a single channel smart USB lite hardware.
Once it was ensured that suitable subjects were selected for the study, the subjects were evaluated by DPOAE testing.
DP-gram stimulus protocol include a frequency range from about 0.5–8 kHz with respect to geometric mean frequency, or 0.55–8 kHz re f2, along with a f2/f1 ratio of 1.22, a level difference of 10 db, and absolute levels of L1 = 65 dB SPL and L2 = 55 dB SPL. The responses were considered as ‘pass’ if 7 out of 9 frequencies were above 6 dB noise level.
Brain Evoked Response Audiometry
Software: HIS, hardware: Smart USB lite single channel.
Using air conducted clicks as stimulus through ER3 insert ear phones at a rate of 19.3 sec.
Testing at 80 db nHL, Absolute and interpeak latencies of I, III, V and I–III, III–V and I–V were considered, respectively.
Results
Among 25 patients with OPC poisoning with respiratory failure, 11 (eleven) patients were male and 14 (fourteen) patients were female.
The age wise distribution is as follows:
Age (years) | No. of patients |
---|---|
15–20 | 04 |
21–25 | 10 |
26–30 | 04 |
31–35 | 04 |
36–40 | 03 |
The days spent on ventilator is as follows;
On ventilator (days) | No. of patients |
---|---|
<5 | 15 |
6–10 | 07 |
11–15 | 03 |
DPOAE: in 17 cases it was absent bilaterally and in 2 (two) cases unilaterally. In 6 (six) cases it was present bilaterally.
BERA: showing abnormality (Tables 1, 2).
Table 1.
Interpeak latency | Right ear | Left ear | Total |
---|---|---|---|
I–III > 2.2 ms | 5 | 3 | 8 |
III–V > 2.2 ms | 4 | 8 | 12 |
I–V > 4.4 ms | 4 | 6 | 10 |
Total | 13 | 17 | 30 |
Table 2.
Prolonged absolute latency | Right | Left | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Wave-I | 9 | 8 | 17 |
Wave-II | 7 | 7 | 14 |
Wave-V | 8 | 9 | 17 |
Total | 24 | 24 | 48 |
In 25 patients having ventilatory support, 16 % of the ears had prolonged interpeak latency between I and III wave, 24 % of the ears had prolonged interpeak latency between III and V wave and 20 % of the ears had prolonged interpeak latency between I and V wave.
56 % of the patients had prolonged interpeak latency in the right ear and 68 % had prolonged interpeak latency in the left ear. Not even a single patient had single lesion. All the 25 patients on ventilator had multiple prolonged interpeak latencies in various segments. Considering individual waves, in wave-I, 34 % of the ears had prolonged absolute latency. In wave-III, 28 % of the ears had prolonged absolute latency. In wave-V, 34 % of the ears had prolonged absolute latency.
98 % of the patients had prolonged absolute latency in the right ear and same percentage of the patients had prolonged absolute latencies in the left ear in either wave-I, III or V. In non ventilatory cases (without respiratory failure):
(a) Sex distribution | |
Male | 48 patients |
Female | 27 patients |
(b) Age distribution | |
15–20 years | 14 patients |
21–25 years | 17 patients |
26–30 years | 30 patients |
31–35 years | 6 patients |
36–40 years | 8 patients |
In patients (75) without respiratory failure in OPC poisoning, DPOAE was absent in 44 patients bilaterally, seven patients unilaterally and it was present in 24 patients (Tables 3, 4).
Table 3.
Prolonged interpeak latency | Right | Left | Total |
---|---|---|---|
I–III > 2.2 ms | 11 | 22 | 33 |
III–V > 2.2 ms | 4 | 9 | 13 |
I–V > 4.4 ms. | 3 | 3 | 6 |
Total | 18 | 34 | 52 |
Table 4.
Prolonged absolute latency | Right | Left | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Wave-I | 19 | 13 | 32 |
Wave-II | 26 | 30 | 56 |
Wave-V | 28 | 30 | 58 |
Total | 73 | 73 | 146 |
22 % of the ears had prolonged interpeak latency in wave I–III, 8.6 % of the ears had prolonged interpeak latency in wave III–V, 4 % of the ears had prolonged interpeak latency in wave I–V.
24 % of the patients had prolonged interpeak latencies in right ear and 45.33 % of the patients had prolonged interpeak latencies in the left ear in various segments.
Absolute latency was prolonged in 21.33 % of the ears in wave-I. 37.33 % of the ears showed prolonged absolute latency in wave-III and 38.66 % of the ears showed prolonged absolute latency in wave-V.
97.33 % of the patients had prolonged absolute latency in right ear and same percentage of the patients had prolonged absolute latency in the left ear in either wave I, III or V.
Discussion
Uses of organophosporus compounds (OPC) ranges from agriculture to warfield [2]. The mechanism of toxicity of OP compounds is the inhibition of acetylcholinesterase (AChE), resulting in an accumulation of acetylcholine and the continued stimulation of acetylcholine receptors. Therefore, they are called anticholinesterase agents.
Their toxicities has been received equal importance and based on these properties the chemical warfare agents are developed [3]. In the last 50 years different OPC has been synthesized and marketed [4, 5]. Presently, more than 100 different OPC are used worldwide as insecticides [6]. The easy availability and innumerable benefits results in quite a number of intoxications [1, 6–10]. Use of pesticides is poorly regulated and often dangerous; their easy availability also makes them a common mode of self poisoning [1, 8, 11].
The toxic manifestations and lethality after nerve agent exposure appear to follow the irreversible phosphorylation of the serine containing active site of AChE.
In respiratory failure there is a need to restore adequate arterial oxygen level for which oxygen therapy is important. The consequences of respiratory failure is systemic hypotension, pulmonary hypertension, polycythaemia, tachycardia and cerebral dysfunction ranging from confusion and coma [12–14].
The Oto- and neuro toxicity of OPC poisoning is something to be concerned of. The early literature was reviewed by Werner (1940), he had clearly described the ototoxic effects of variety of agents including arsenicals [15], ethyl and methyl alcohol, nicotine, bacterial toxins, and heavy metal compounds.
Oto toxic hearing impairment is exclusively sensorineural. Bilateral high frequency loss is the usual finding which corresponds to hair cell loss in the basal turn of the cochlea. Unilateral Cochlear and vestibular dysfunction is not uncommon [16]. The rapidity of onset and degree of hearing loss is usually dose-related and dependent on renal function. The loss is typically permanent.
Ototoxic substances acting on the vestibulocochlear system may damage the outer hair cells (OHC), the eighth cranial nerve, the vestibular system (CNS) [17]. There is evidence that hearing loss may be early manifestation of organophosphorus poisoning [18].
Several authors have described cases of sensorineural hearing loss due to exposure to agro chemical substances, ranging from mild to moderate loss. It has been reported that acute organophosphorus intoxication may cause profound bilateral hearing loss. The literature has reported that higher frequency auditory thresholds are more prone to damage [19].
Conclusion
The most life threatening complication is respiratory failure, which is mainly due to central effect of the nerve agents. Hypoxia is also a major problem in the OPC, which may cause cerebral edema and convulsion and induces histopathologic brain damage.
In our present study, we understand that exposure to OPC poisoning with or without respiratory failure has definitive detrimental effect on the auditory pathway.
Considering all these effects of OPC on the central nervous system and subtle effects on the peripheral and central auditory pathway, it is advisable to keep a tab on the patients during the recovery phase and on follow-up in the due course.
References
- 1.Eddleston M, Gunnell D, Karunaratne A, de Silva D, Sheriff MH, Buckley NA. Epidemiology of intentional self-poisoning in rural Sri Lanka. Br J Psychiatry. 2005;187:583–584. doi: 10.1192/bjp.187.6.583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Balali Mood M, Shariat M. Treatment of organophosphate poisoning. Experience of nerve agents and acute pesticide poisoning on the effects of oximes. J Physiol Paris. 1998;92:375–378. doi: 10.1016/S0928-4257(99)80008-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Minton NA, Murray VS. A review of organophosphate poisoning. Med Toxicol Adverse Drug Exp. 1988;3:350–375. doi: 10.1007/BF03259890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ballantyne B, Marrs T. Overview of the biological and clinical aspects of organophosphates and carbamates. In: Balantyne B, Marrs TC, editors. Clinical and experimental toxicology of organophosphates and carbamates. Oxford: Butterworth and Heinemann; 1992. pp. 3–14. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Eto M. Organophosphorus pesticides: organic and biological chemistry. Cleveland: CRC Press; 1974. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kwong K. Organophosphates pesticides: biochemistry and clinical toxicology. Ther Drug Monit. 2002;24:144–149. doi: 10.1097/00007691-200202000-00022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Forget G. Pesticides and the Third World. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1991;32:11–31. doi: 10.1080/15287399109531462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Amr MM. Pesticide monitoring and its health problems in Egypt, a Third World country. Toxicol Lett. 1999;107:1–13. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4274(99)00026-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cocker J, Mason HJ, Garfitt SJ, Jones K. Biological monitoring of exposure to organophosphates pesticides. Toxicol Lett. 2002;134:97–103. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4274(02)00168-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Brown MA, Brix KA. Review of health consequences from high-, intermediate-, and low level exposure to organophosphorus nerve agents. J Appl Toxicol. 1998;18:393–408. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1263(199811/12)18:6<393::AID-JAT528>3.0.CO;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Eddleston M, Karalliedde L, Buckley N, Fernando R, Hutchinson G, Ishiter G, et al. Pesticide poisoning in the developing world—a minimum pesticides list. Lancet. 2002;360:1163–1167. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11204-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Thiermann H, Szinicz L, Eyer F, Worek F, Eyer P, Felgenhauer N, et al. Modern strategies in therapy of organophosphate poisoning. Toxicol Lett. 1999;107:233–239. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4274(99)00052-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sidell FR. Soman and Sarin: clinical manifestations and treatment of accidental poisoning by organophosphates. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 1974;7:1–17. doi: 10.3109/15563657408987971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rengstorff RH. Accidental exposure to sarin: vision effects. Arch Toxicol. 1985;56:201–203. doi: 10.1007/BF00333427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bencko B. Test of environmental exposure to arsenic and hearing changes in exposed children. Environ Health Perspect. 1977;19:95–101. doi: 10.1289/ehp.771995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lim DJ. Effects of noise and ototoxic drugs at the cellular level in the cochlea: a review. Am J Otolaryngol. 1986;7:73–99. doi: 10.1016/S0196-0709(86)80037-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bernandi APA (2003) Testes utilizados na avaliacao de trabalhadores expostos a niveis de pressao Sonora elevados e solvents. Em: Bernadi APA. Conhecimentos essenciais para atuar bem em empresas: audiologia ocupacional. Colecao CEFAC. Sao Jose dos campos: Pulso, pp 67–80
- 18.Manjabosco CAW, Morato TC, Marques SJM. Perfil audiometrico de trabalhadores agricolas. Arq int otorrinolaringol. 2004;8(4):284–295. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Harell M, Shea JJ, Ernett JT. Bilateral sudden deafness following combined insecticide poisoning. Laryngoscope. 1987;88:1348–1351. doi: 10.1288/00005537-197808000-00018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]