Skip to main content
Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association logoLink to Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association
. 2011 Dec 1;12(4):259–262. doi: 10.5152/jtgga.2011.60

Prenatal early diagnosis of dacryocystocele, a case report and review of literature

Dakriyosistoselin prenatal erken tanısı, vaka sunumu ve literatür taraması

Banu Bingöl 1,, Alin Başgül 1, Nilgün Güdücü 1, Herman İşci 1, İlkkan Dünder 1
PMCID: PMC3939260  PMID: 24592005

Abstract

Dacryocystocele (mucocele, amniocele) is a relatively rare variant of nasolacrimal duct obstruction which refers to the cystic dilatation of lacrimal pathway above and below the lacrimal sac. It is a benign pathology and can be treated successfully after birth, but its prenatal detection is important, because it may be seen in numerous syndromes and may serve as their marker. Bilateral cysts have the possibility for intranasal extension and an obstruction to the nasal passages may result in neonatal respiratory distress requiring surgical intervention Unilateral cases are important for the differential diagnosis with serious facial abnormalities. We present a case of early prenatal detection of a 28 year-old G: 1 P: 0 pregnant woman with bilateral dacryocystocele. She presented a live, normally developed singleton fetus on sonographic examination at 12, 16 and 22 weeks. At 25th weeks, we diagnosed a hypoechogenic mass, that was situated inferomedially to the eyes in the fetal face with 2 and 3-D ultrasound. A 3850-g live female infant was delivered by Cesarean section due to breech presentation at 39 weeks following preterm rupture of membranes. We report the case with intranasal components studied during fetal life by 2 and 3-D ultrasound and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.

Keywords: Dacryocystocele, mucocele, amniocele, magnetic resonance imaging, nasolacrimal duct cyst

Introduction

Dacryocystocele is the occlusion of lacrimal drainage system distally and proximally during the fetal life; it dilates accumulating mucus and amniotic fluid (1). The causes of dacryocystocele include congenital deformities, trauma, primary and recurrent tumors affecting the nasolacrimal duct, idiopathic blockage of the nasolacrimal duct and iatrogenic causes including treatment of head and neck cancer in the sinonasal region (2, 3). Prenatal diagnosis is nevertheless important, because bilateral dacryocystocele, extending intranasally is one of the possible causes of neonatal nasal obstruction (4, 5). Moreover unilateral cases make the prenatal differential diagnosis of serious facial anomalies more difficult. Besides, it may be part of some syndromes, which makes the prenatal early diagnosis more important (68).

Case Report

A 28 year-old G:1 P:0 pregnant woman admitted to our clinic for antenatal follow up. A first trimester nuchal translucency measurement of 1.7 mm was associated with an adjusted risk for trisomy 21 of 1 in 730. Normal anatomy of the fetus including face and central nervous system were demonstrated at the 22-week examination. In 25th week, she admitted for a control and oral glucose loading test. The ultrasound examination demonstrated a breech presentation. We noticed bilateral cystic lesions measuring 0.5×0.6 mm and 0.5×0.4 mm inferomedial to the orbits. The facial profile seemed normal and the intraocular anatomy was also normal with synchronous movement of the eyes. The detailed examination of the brain appeared normal. The genetic sonogram revealed no evidence of any other associated abnormality. We referred the patient for a fetal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging examination. The abnormality was shown with 2D–3D ultrasound and MR as shown in Figure 13. A repeat scan 2 weeks later revealed the cyst volumes to be slightly increased (0.7×0.8 mm and 0.8×0.9) with no additional findings. We examined the patient every 2 weeks and followed the dimensions of the cysts and other possible abnormal findings. We diagnosed the case as bilateral dacryocystocele and the parents were counseled about the pathology. It is explained that dacryocystocele is usually an isolated pathology however rarely; it might be part of a syndrome that may not be identified antenatally. A 3850-g live female infant was delivered by Cesarean section due to breech presentation at 39 weeks following preterm rupture of membranes. The dimension of cysts at right and left sides were 1.2×1.3 and 1.1×1.4 respectively. There were no clinical signs of respiratory compromise and the infant revealed a blue swelling on the medial borders of both orbits confirming the diagnosis of dacryocystocele. Postnatally, the infant was consulted with Ophthalmology Department and the dacryocystocele was treated with gentle massage in 2 weeks. The infant seemed normal after the treatment and no further treatment was necessary. She completed 6 months of life and there is no evidence of any recurrence.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

2-D view of dacryosystocele

Figure 3.

Figure 3

MRI view of dacryosystocele

Discussion

Dacryocystocele or lacrimal duct cyst is a very rare condition caused by obstruction of the lacrimal duct, usually due to a thin membrane remaining at its distal end. Rupture of the cyst is normally spontaneous during the first month of life (9). Prenatal of congenital dacryocystocele has been described but there are a few reports in the literature, and the earliest diagnosis was made in 27th gestational weeks (10).

The diagnosis is potentially important because bilateral cysts have the possibility for intranasal extension and an obstruction to the nasal passages may result in neonatal respiratory distress requiring surgical intervention (11). Because neonates obligate nasal breathers, the risk of acute respiratory distress in the early neonatal period should be considered and a pediatrician should be present for delivery (6).

The differential diagnosis of perinatal masses includes dacryocystocele, cystic teratomas, dermoid cysts, hemangiomas, encephalocele, nasal glioma and rhabdomyosarcoma (7). The differential diagnosis between dacryocystocele and other less benign periorbital masses is often not possible only with ultrasound, especially when the lesion is unilateral. Prenatal MR imaging better defines the location of the various components of lacrimal system dilatation and their relation to the nasal cavity. This information may provide the possible postnatal respiratory distress (12).

The lacrimal drainage system begins to develop around the 6th week of pregnancy. As the surface ectoderm in the naso-optic fissure thickens, an epithelial cord detaches from it and buries itself between the lateral nasal and maxillary processes. Cephalic and caudal growth of this epithelial cord will give rise to the lacrimal canaliculi, sac and duct (8). Canalization of the nasolacrimal pathway begins at about 12 weeks of gestation and is complete from as early as 24 weeks. However, the nasal (distal) end may perforate only at birth or even later (10). In our case, the first antenatal diagnosis was made at 25th gestational week. To our knowledge, it is the earliest case diagnosed prenatally in the literature.

Atresia of the Hasner valve, at the distal end of the nasolacrimal duct, is the main cause of simple congenital dacryostenosis (13). Dacryocystocele is a much less common disorder, is already symptomatic at birth. In this condition, additional functional obstruction at the orbital end of the lacrimal sac is present together with the atresia of the distal end of the nasolacrimal duct. The sac fills with amniotic fluid and intrinsic mukoid secretion and becomes distended, causing the canaliculi to kink. These then act as a one-way valve, permitting fluid only to enter into the sac (14).

There are a few numbers of prenatal diagnoses of dacryocystocele reported in the literature. In two reports of Rand and Walsh, the diagnoses were made at 30–36 weeks of gestation (15, 16). Sharony et al. who reported the earliest diagnosis was at 27th gestational weeks; desribed 6 cases of dacryocystocele; accompanying some syndromes and other pathologies as Canavan disease, pyelectasis, dysplastic kidney and maternal diabetes (10). Westbrook et al., reported recurrent bilateral dacryocystoceles in Wegener’s granulomatosis which is defined as a chronic disease with peak onset between the ages of 20–40 years (17). The classic Wegener’s triad includes; necrotizing granulomas of the upper and lower respiratory tract, vasculitis, and glomerulonephritis (18). In our case there was no other pathology neither defined on prenatal scan nor after birth.

Dacryocystocele is seen as a hypoechogenic mass locating inferiomedially to the orbit that may be seen in the coronal or parasagittal plane including the nose and medial angle of the orbits. Hemangioma is cutaneous in origin and it is located in the head or neck, septated or solid (19). It is differentiated form the dacryocystocele with its typical Doppler patterns (20). A dermoid cyst has a complex appearance and hyperechogenic situated superolaterally to the globe on ultrasound with areas of calcification usually present. Anterior cephalocele is a mid-line defect accompanied by a calvarial defect and usually hydrocephalus. The other orbital masses are neurofibromatosis, lymphangioma and rhabdomyosarcoma, but these are solid in origin and extremely rare. Nasolacrimal mucocele is also very rare and difficult to be diagnosed prenatally (21).

The sonographic appearance of dacryocystocele allows the differential diagnosis of this pathology, revealing the location, size, time of appearance, echogenicity and Doppler flow characteristics (22). MRI is helpful in ruling out a potential intracranial connection (23).

The treatment of dacryocystocele is controversial (2426). Most of the physicians have advocated conservative treatment with antibiotics and massage (27, 28). Lucarelli et al. reported a case of corneal ectasia associated with massage of dacryocystocele (29). In our patient, we used gentle massage and treated the pathology successfully with no complication. Some physicians have recommended early surgical intervention if there is not a rapid response to conservative therapy or recommended prompt surgical therapy (21, 23).

In conclusion, when the diagnosis is contemplated prenatally, it is important to be aware of the risk of acute respiratory distress in the early neonatal period especially if the pathology is bilateral (30). Besides, other possible causes of duct obstruction or cystic dilatation must be excluded. The possibility of associations with syndromes must be kept in mind and other structural abnormalities should be controlled carefully.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

3-D view of dacryosystocele

Footnotes

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

References

  • 1.Ogawa GS, Gonnering RS. Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. J Pediatr. 1991;119:12–7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)81031-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Shashy RG, Durairaj VD, Holmes JM, Hohberger GG, Thompson DM, Kasperbauer JL. Congenital dacryocystocele associated with intranasal cysts: diagnosis and management. Laryngoscope. 2003;113:37–40. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200301000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bhaya M, Meehan R, Har-El G. Dacryocystocele in an adult: endoscopic management. Am J Otolaryngol. 1997;18:131–4. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0709(97)90102-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Castillo M, Merten DF, Weissler MC. Bilateral nasolacrimal duct mucocele, a rare cause of respiratory distress: CT findings in two newborns. Am J Neuroradiol. 1993;14:1011–3. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hepler KM, Woodson GE, Kearns DB. Respiratory distress in the neonate. Sequela of a congenital dacryocystocele. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;121:1423–5. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1995.01890120079016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Alper CM, Chan KH, Hill LM, Chenevey P. Antenatal diagnosis of a congenital nasolacrimal duct cyst by ultrasonography: a case report. Prenat Diagn. 1994;14:623–6. doi: 10.1002/pd.1970140719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Shipp TD, Bromley B, Benacerraf B. The ultrasonographic appearance and outcome for fetuses with masses distorting the fetal face. J Ultrasound Med. 1995;14:673–8. doi: 10.7863/jum.1995.14.9.673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sevel D. Development and congenital abnormalities of the nasolacrimal apparatus. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1981;18:13–9. doi: 10.3928/0191-3913-19810901-06. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Salvetat ML, D’Ottavio G, Pensiero S, Vinciguerra A, Perissutti P. Prenatal sonographic detection of a bilateral dacryocystocele. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1999;36:295–7. doi: 10.3928/0191-3913-19990901-12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sharony R, Raz J, Aviram R, Cohen I, Beyth Y, Tepper R. Prenatal diagnosis of dacryocystocele: a possible marker for syndromes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999;14:71–3. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.14010071.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Right PD, Hubbell RN, Lawrol PP., Jr Respiratory distress associated with bilateral nasolacrimal duct cysts. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1993;26:199–203. doi: 10.1016/0165-5876(93)90028-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bianchini E, Zirpoli S, Righini A, Rustico M, Parazzini C, Triulzi F. Magnetic resonance imaging in prenatal diagnosis of dacryocystocele: report of 3 cases. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2004;28:422–7. doi: 10.1097/00004728-200405000-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cassady JV. Developmental anatomy of nasolacrimal duct. AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1952;47:141–58. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1952.01700030146003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rand PK, Ball WS, Jr, Kulwin DR. Congenital nasolacrimal mucoceles: CT evaluation. Radiology. 1989;173:691–4. doi: 10.1148/radiology.173.3.2813773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Walsh G, Dubbins PA. Antenatal sonographic diagnosis of a dacryocystocele. J Clin Ultrasound. 1994;22:457–60. doi: 10.1002/jcu.1870220710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Davis WK, Mahony BS, Carroll BA, Bowie JD. Antenatal sonographic detection of benign dacrocystoceles (lacrimal duct cysts) J Ultrasound Med. 1987;6:461–5. doi: 10.7863/jum.1987.6.8.461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Westbrook BJ, Scurry WC, Jr, Hudak DT, McGinn J, Stack BC., Jr Recurrent bilateral dacryocystoceles in Wegener’s granulomatosis: a rhinologic perspective. Am J Otolaryngol. 2006;27:409–12. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2006.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gubbels SP, Barkhuizen A, Hwang PH. Head and neck manifestations of Wegener’s granulomatosis. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2003;36:685–705. doi: 10.1016/s0030-6665(03)00023-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Meizner I, Bar-Ziv J, Holcberg G, Katz M. In utero prenatal diagnosis of fetal facial tumor-hemangioma. J Clin Ultrasound. 1985;13:435–7. doi: 10.1002/jcu.1870130615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pennell RG, Baltarowich OH. Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of a fetal facial hemangioma. J Ultrasound Med. 1986;5:525–8. doi: 10.7863/jum.1986.5.9.525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mansour AM, Barber JC, Reinecke RD, Wang FM. Ocular choristomas. Surv Ophthalmol. 1989;33:339–58. doi: 10.1016/0039-6257(89)90011-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sepulveda W, Wojakowski AB, Elias D, Otaño L, Gutierrez J. Congenital dacryocystocele: prenatal 2-and 3-dimensional sonographic findings. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24:225–30. doi: 10.7863/jum.2005.24.2.225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Brugger PC, Weber M, Prayer D. Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal efferent lacrimal pathways. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:1965–73. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-1755-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Harris GJ, DiClementi D. Congenital dacryocystocele. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982;100:1763–5. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1982.01030040743006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Schnall BM, Christian CJ. Conservative treatment of congenital dacryocele. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1996;33:219–22. doi: 10.3928/0191-3913-19960901-04. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Paysse EA, Coats DK, Bernstein JM, Go C, de Jong AL. Management and complications of congenital dacryocele with concurrent intranasal mucocele. J AAPOS. 2000;4:46–53. doi: 10.1016/s1091-8531(00)90011-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Levy NS. Conservative management of congenital amniotocele of the nasolacriminal sac. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1979;16:254–6. doi: 10.3928/0191-3913-19790701-11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Grin TR, Mertz JS, Stass-Isern M. Congenital nasolacrimal duct cysts in dacryocystocele. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:1238–42. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(91)32149-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lucarelli MJ, DeBry P. Corneal ectasia associated with massage of dacryocystoceles. Cornea. 2002;21:419–20. doi: 10.1097/00003226-200205000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tsai YS, Huang JK. Neonatal nasal obstruction caused by bilateral dacryocystoceles. Pediatr Radiol. 2006;36:1221. doi: 10.1007/s00247-006-0284-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association are provided here courtesy of Turkish German Gynecological Association

RESOURCES