Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1983 Jun;80(11):3284–3286. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.11.3284

Structural and dynamic differences between supercoiled and linear DNA from proton NMR.

P Bendel, T L James
PMCID: PMC394025  PMID: 6574485

Abstract

Proton NMR experiments on an intact plasmid supercoiled DNA molecule are reported. Spectra of the hydrogen-bonded exchangeable imino protons and nonexchangeable aromatic protons of pIns36 (7,200 base pairs; Mr 5 x 10(6)) were examined at 240 and 360 MHz. In contrast to linear DNA of comparable size in which the signals from these protons are broadened almost beyond detection, the supercoiled DNA exhibits a remarkably well-resolved spectrum in the range 12-15 ppm, with linewidths characteristic of linear DNA molecules with molecular weight nearly two orders of magnitude smaller. These results imply an extraordinary degree of mobility in accord with our earlier discovery of unusually long 31P spin-spin relaxation times in the supercoiled molecule. Alterations in the chemical shift of the imino proton resonance positions in supercoiled DNA compared to linear DNA imply that the structure is modified in the A . T base pairs with at least two distinct structures apparent from the spectrum. However, little or no alteration is evident in the resonances due to the G . C base pairs.

Full text

PDF
3284

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arter D. B., Schmidt P. G. Ring current shielding effects in nucleic acid double helices. Nucleic Acids Res. 1976 Jun;3(6):1437–1447. doi: 10.1093/nar/3.6.1437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bauer W. R. Structure and reactions of closed duplex DNA. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1978;7:287–313. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.07.060178.001443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Birnboim H. C., Doly J. A rapid alkaline extraction procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979 Nov 24;7(6):1513–1523. doi: 10.1093/nar/7.6.1513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Early T. A., Kearns D. R. 1H nuclear magnetic resonance investigation of flexibility in DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Sep;76(9):4165–4169. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.9.4165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Early T. A., Kearns D. R., Hillen W., Wells R. D. A 300- and 600-MHz proton nuclear magnetic resonance investigation of a 12 base pair deoxyribonucleic acid restriction fragment: relaxation behavior of the low-field resonances in water. Biochemistry. 1981 Jun 23;20(13):3756–3764. doi: 10.1021/bi00516a014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Early T. A., Kearns D. R., Hillen W., Wells R. D. A 300-MHz proton nuclear magnetic resonance investigation of deoxyribonucleic acid restriction fragments: dynamic properties. Biochemistry. 1981 Jun 23;20(13):3764–3769. doi: 10.1021/bi00516a015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hogan M. E., Jardetzky O. Internal motions in DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Dec;76(12):6341–6345. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.12.6341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kearns D. R. High-resolution nuclear magnetic resonance studies of double helical polynucleotides. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1977;6:477–523. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.06.060177.002401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Keepers J. W., Kollman P. A., Weiner P. K., James T. L. Molecular mechanical studies of DNA flexibility: coupled backbone torsion angles and base-pair openings. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Sep;79(18):5537–5541. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.18.5537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mandal C., Kallenbach N. R., Englander S. W. Base-pair opening and closing reactions in the double helix. A stopped-flow hydrogen exchange study in poly(rA).poly(rU). J Mol Biol. 1979 Dec 5;135(2):391–411. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(79)90443-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Patel D. J., Kozlowski S. A., Marky L. A., Broka C., Rice J. A., Itakura K., Breslauer K. J. Premelting and melting transitions in the d(CGCGAATTCGCG) self-complementary duplex in solution. Biochemistry. 1982 Feb 2;21(3):428–436. doi: 10.1021/bi00532a002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Radloff R., Bauer W., Vinograd J. A dye-buoyant-density method for the detection and isolation of closed circular duplex DNA: the closed circular DNA in HeLa cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1967 May;57(5):1514–1521. doi: 10.1073/pnas.57.5.1514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Vologodskii A. V., Lukashin A. V., Anshelevich V. V., Frank-Kamenetskii M. D. Fluctuations in superhelical DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979 Mar;6(3):967–982. doi: 10.1093/nar/6.3.967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Zuiderweg E. R., Scheek R. M., Veeneman G., van Boom J. H., Kaptein R., Rüterjans H., Beyreuther K. 1H NMR studies of lac-operator DNA fragments. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981 Dec 11;9(23):6553–6569. doi: 10.1093/nar/9.23.6553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES