Skip to main content
PMC home page
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2014 Mar 3;9(3):e90308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090308

The Wnt Antagonist sFRP1 as a Favorable Prognosticator in Human Biliary Tract Carcinoma

Pengcheng Kang 1, Ming Wan 1, Peng Huang 1, Chunlong Li 1, Zhidong Wang 1, Xiangyu Zhong 1, Zhanliang Hu 1, Sheng Tai 1, Yunfu Cui 1,*
Editor: Surinder K Batra2
PMCID: PMC3940873  PMID: 24594839

Abstract

Inactivation of Secreted Frizzled-Related Protein-1 (SFRP1) and overexpression of β-catenin play important roles in the development and progression of a wide range of malignancies. We sought to determine whether the expression of SFRP1 and β-catenin correlates with clinicopathologic parameters in human biliary tract cancer (BTC) and to evaluate the potential roles of these proteins as prognostic indicators. The expression of SFRP1 and β-catenin in 78 patients with BTC and 36 control patients as investigated by immunohistochemistry. A wide variety of statistical parameters were assessed to determine the association between these proteins and the occurrence, clinical features, and overall survival rate in BTC.SFRP1 and β-catenin had an inverse correlation (r = −0.636, P<0.0001) as assessed by Spearman rank analysis, with 52 (66.7%) of the BTC samples negative for SFRP1 expression and 53 (68.0%) positive for β-catenin expression. Expression of each protein was associated with the histological type and lymph node invasion of BTC. A significantly poorer overall survival rate was observed for patients with low SFRP1 expression (P<0.0001) or high β-catenin expression (P = 0.007). SFRP1 expression (P<0.0001), β-catenin expression (P<0.01) and histological type (P<0.01) were correlated with overall survival rate as assessed by univariate analysis; while multivariate analysis suggested that SFRP1 (hazard ratio, 10.514; 95% confidence intervals, 2.381–39.048; P<0.0001) may serve as an independent prognostic factor for BTC. Collectively, these results demonstrate that SFRP1 is a favorable prognostic factor for human BTC and that its expression inversely correlates with that of β-catenin.

Introduction

Biliary tract cancer (BTC), which is the second most common primary hepatobiliary malignancy, arises from the ductal epithelium of the biliary tree and is characterized by increasing incidence and poor prognosis [1]–[3]. At present, radical surgical resection, chemotherapy or radiation are used as curative treatments for BTC that is diagnosed in early stages. However, this disease is usually fatal, with most patients diagnosed in advanced stages [1], [4], [5]. Therefore, it is imperative to find effective biomarkers for early diagnosis and to elucidate the molecular mechanisms associated with pathogenesis [6]–[7].

The Wnt signaling pathway plays an important role in embryonic development, cell differentiation and cell proliferation [8], and its role in bile duct development has been established [9]. Wnt proteins are secreted molecules that interact with transmembrane receptors of the frizzled family. β-catenin is the most important component of the Wnt signaling pathway, with its altered localization serving as a marker of pathway activation. Once the Wnt ligand binds to its receptor, a complex signaling cascade is activated that leads to stabilization of cytosolic β-catenin. The β-catenin then pools and translocates to the nucleus, where it interacts with LEF/TCF transcription factor, leading to the activation of downstream target genes [10], including several oncogenes, such as c-myc, cyclin D1 and c-jun [11]–[12]. Recently, the aberrant activation of the Wnt signal transduction pathway has been shown to be closely linked to tumorigenesis in adults [13]–[15].

Secreted frizzled-related protein-1 (SFRP1) is an antagonist of the Wnt signaling pathway that maps to chromosome 8p12-p11.1. SFRP1 harbors a domain that is homologous to the frizzled receptors [16] and can bind Wnt proteins in the extracellular compartment, thus inhibiting ligand–receptor interaction and signal transduction[17]. Inactivation of SFRP1 has been reported in a wide range of human malignancies, including ovarian [18], bladder [19], mesothelioma [20], breast [21]–[22], esophageal [23], prostate [24]and gastric cancers [25]. Furthermore the SFRP1 gene displays a high methylation frequency in cholangiocarcinoma, suggesting the possibility of its tumor-specific inactivation [26]. However, to our knowledge, the role of SFRP1 expression in human biliary tract carcinoma has not been directly examined.

The purpose of this study was to examine SFRP1 and β-catenin expression in human BTC by immunohistochemistry. We evaluated the relationship of their expression with clinicopathologic parameters. Our results suggest that SFRP1 may serve as a candidate tumor suppressor gene for BTC.

Patients and Methods

We obtained a total of 114 samples from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang, China from April 2008 to June 2010, including 78 samples from patients with pathologically confirmed BTC and 36 normal bile duct samples. Among the tumor samples, 34 were males and 44 females, with a median age of 57.6 years, ranging from 37 to 78 years.

Normal bile ducts were collected from patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for treatment of pancreatic or duodenal nontumor diseases, while their bile ducts remained diseases-free. The median age of the control group was 52.4 years, ranging from 42 to 73 years. Samples were collected according to the approval of the ethical committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, with written individual consent from each patient for this study. The pathological data of all patients that received curative resection were assessed based on the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer for BTC. All patients were followed up to June 2013.

Immunohistochemistry

Surgical specimens were stained with hematoxylin-eosin to identify a representative paraffin block with typical tumor morphology. We used successive paraffin-embedded sections at 4 µm intervals for assessment. All sections were deparaffinized with xylene and rehydrated with graded ethanol solution. The sections were then incubated in 3% hydrogen peroxide at room temperature for 15 min to inactivate endogenous peroxidases. After washing with phosphate-buffered saline, antigen retrieval was performed in citrate buffer (pH  = 6.0) for 20 min in a microwave oven to enhance the immunoreactivity. Then the sections were incubated in blocking serum for 30 min at 37°C to reduce nonspecific binding, followed by incubation with anti-SFRP1 rabbit polyclonal antibody (Abgent, SanDiego, USA) or anti-β-catenin mouse monoclonal antibody (Santa Cruz, Biotechnology, Inc) at a dilution of 1∶100 overnight at 4°C. As a negative control, tissue sections were incubated with phosphate-buffered saline instead of the primary antibodies. The sections were incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)–streptavidin complex for 30 min. Then, biotinylated antirabbit immunoglobulin or goat antimouse secondary antibody and streptavidin peroxidase complex reagent were applied. All sections were counterstained with hematoxylin after visualization with the diaminobenzidine chromogen.

Positive cases of staining for SFRP-1 exhibited clear cytoplasmic staining that was predominately perinuclear. Positive cases for β-catenin staining exhibited cytomembrane and nuclear staining. Scoring of the staining was according to the following criteria: (−), no cell staining; (+), <25% cell staining; (++), 25–50% cell staining; and (+++), >50% cell staining. For all cases, (−) and (+) were defined as negative expression, and (++) and (+++) as positive expressions. Each stained section was blindly evaluated by two investigators unaware of the clinical information. Samples were observed under high power magnification (200×).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 17.0 software. Chi-square tests were used to clarify the relationship between SFRP1/β-catenin expression and clinicopathologic features. Overall patient survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with patient survival times calculated from the time of surgery to the time of death or the most recent follow-up. Spearman rank correlation was carried out to evaluate the relationship between SFRP1 and β-catenin expression. The significance of clinicopathologic parameters was determined by univariate log-rank testing, and the Cox proportional hazards regression model was applied to analyze independent prognostic factors selected by univariate analysis. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Patient information

A total of 78 BTC patients were registered in this study, including 34 males and 44 females with an average age of 57.5 years (Table 1, first two columns). According to the American Joint Committee on Cancer classification, 10 were stage I patients, 24 stage II patients, 16 stage III patients and 28 stage IV patients. The clinical characteristics of the patients, including TNM staging, histological type, lymph node invasion, differentiation grade, metastasis after surgery and 3-year survival, are shown, as well as serum CEA and CA-19-9 levels and HBV infection status before and after surgery. The follow-up period (the time from the operation date to the day of the last visit) continued until June 2013. The survival time ranged from 1 to 36 months (mean 23.3 months). During this period, 46 patients died of recurrence.

Table 1. Relationships between the expression of SFRP1, β-catenin and clinicopathologic features in human biliary tract cancer.

Clinicopathologic features
n SFRP1 P β-catenin P
Negative n = 52 Positive n = 26 Negative Positive
Gender
Male 34 20 14 0.196 10 24 0.661
Female 44 32 12 15 29
Age (years)
<60 32 22 10 8 24 0.266
≥60 46 30 16 0.745 17 29
TNM stage
I 10 7 3 0.182 4 6 0.039
II 24 18 6 4 20
III 16 7 9 3 13
IVa 28 20 8 14 14
Histological type
Adenocarcinoma 70 44 26 0.01 24 46 0.05
Mcinous adenocarcinoma 5 5 0 1 4
Papillary carcinoma 3 3 0 0 3
Anatomical distribution
Intrahepatic 20 14 6 0.599 5 15 0.233
Perihilar 31 22 9 8 23
Distal 27 16 11 12 15
Lymph node invasion
Present 47 36 11 0.022 5 37 0.012
Absent 31 16 15 12 16
Differentiation grade
Well/moderately 36 20 16 0.054 12 24 0.822
Poorly/undifferentiated 42 32 10 13 29
Metastasis after surgery
+ 44 28 16 0.518 14 30 0.960
− 34 24 10 11 23
Survival rate
>3 years 32 16 16 0.009 15 17 0.019
≤3 years 46 36 10 10 36
Serum CEA level
>5 ng/ml 45 27 18 0.145 14 31 0.835
≤5 ng/ml 33 25 8 11 22
Serum CA19-9 level
>37 U/ml 48 31 17 0.622 15 33 0.848
≤37 U/ml 30 21 9 10 20
HBV infection
+ 40 25 15 0.423 13 27 0.931
− 38 27 11 12 26
Open in a new tab

As a control, we also collected 36 normal bile duct samples from patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for treatment of non-cancerous pancreatic or duodenal disease.

SFRP1 expression is reduced and β-catenin expression is increased in BTC

To determine whether SFRP1 and β-catenin expression may correlate with the occurrence of BTC, immunohistochemistry was performed. SFRP1 expression was detected primarily in the cytoplasm in the perinuclear region, while β-catenin was detected in nucleus and cytomembrane (Fig. 1). According to our rating criteria, 52 (66.7%) of the 78 carcinoma specimens were categorized as negative for SFRP1 expression and 26 (33.3%) were categorized as positive. In the normal bile duct tissue, the expression of SFRP1 was significantly higher with 11 (30.6%) negative and 25 (69.4%) positive. Conversely, for β-catenin expression 25 (32.1%) of the carcinoma specimens were negative and (67.9%) were positive; whereas for the normal biliary tract specimens 28 (77.8%) were negative and 8 (22.2%) were positive (Table 2). These results suggest that SFRP1 expression is reduced and β-catenin expression is increased in BTC.

Figure 1. Immunological staining for SFRP1 and β-catenin in human biliary tract carcinoma.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Table 2. Immunohistochemical Staining of SFRP1 and β-catenin expression in human biliary tract cancer versus normal bile duct tissues.

Biliary tract status n SFRP1 β-catenin
Negative Positive Negative Positive
Cancerous 78 52 (66.7%) 26 (33%) 25 (32.1%) 53 (67.9%)
Non-cancerous 36 11 (30.6%) 25 (69.4%) 28 (77.8%) 8 (22.2%)
Open in a new tab

SFRP1 and β-catenin expression correlates with clinicopathological features of BTC

To determine whether the expression of SFRP1 and β-catenin correlate with clinicopathological tumor parameters among the 78 BTC samples, we performed chi-square tests. Statistically significant differences in histological type, lymph node invasion and overall survival rate (P<0.05) were observed for both genes, while the TNM stage was only statistically different for β-catenin, and the differentiation grade and occurrence of metastasis after surgery showed no statistically significant difference (Table 1). These results suggest that the reduced SFRP1 expression and increased β-catenin expression in BTC correlate with the status of the disease.

SFRP1 and β-catenin expression are inversely correlated in BTC

To determine the relationship between the expression of SFRP1 and β-catenin, the 78 BTC samples were further divided into four groups according to expression levels (-, +, ++, and +++). Based on Spearman rank analysis, an inverse correlation between SFRP1 and β-catenin expression was identified (r = −0.636, P<0.0001, Table 3). These results further verify the inverse association of high SFRP1 expression and low β-catenin expression in BTC.

Table 3. Inverse correlation between SFRP1 expression and β-catenin expression in human biliary tract cancer*.

SFRP1 β-catenin Total
− + ++ +++
− 0 3 14 17 34
+ 0 2 6 10 18
++ 6 4 3 1 14
+++ 8 2 2 0 12
Total 14 11 25 28 78
Open in a new tab

*r = 0.636, P = 0.001.

Univariate and multivariate analyses of survival rates in BTC patients

To further examine whether SFRP1 and β-catenin expression correlates with overall survival in BTC, survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results indicate that patients with negative SFRP1 expression have a significantly poorer overall survival rate than those with positive SFRP1 expression (P<0.0001, Fig. 2A); and conversely, patients with positive β-catenin expression have a poorer overall survival rate than those with negative β-catenin expression (p = 0.007, Fig. 2B).

Figure 2. Meier-Kaplan curves of the correlation of SFRP1 and β-catenin expression with overall survival in patients with BTC.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

To assess the contribution of clinicopathological features as potential prognostic factors, 13 clinicopathologic variables were analyzed in the 78 BTC patients by univariate analysis. The results show that SFRP1 expression, β-catenin expression and histological type are statistically significant factors (Table 4). To further investigate the contribution of these 3 factors we performed multivariate analysis. Only SFRP1 expression could be verified as an independent prognostic marker (Table 5), suggesting that among these variables, high SFRP1 expression may serve as the best prognostic indicator of poor survival in BTC.

Table 4. Univariate analysis of clinicopathologic features for overall survival of 78 patients with biliary tract cancer.

Characteristics n Survival rate (%) P
Gender
Male 34 54.3 0.693
Female 44 53.5
Age(year)
<60 32 41.9 0.984
≥60 46 61.7
TNM stage
I 10 54.5 0.365
II 24 58.3
III 16 43.8
IVa 28 55.6
Histological type
Adenocarcinoma 70 52.9 <0.05
Mcinous adenocarcinoma 5 80.0
Papillary carcinoma 3 33.3
Anatomical distribution
Intrahepatic 20 30.0 0.267
Perihilar 31 46.9
Distal 27 65.4
Lymph node invasion
Present 47 54.7 0.494
Absent 31 52.0
Differentiation
Well/moderately 36 45.9 0.068
Poorly/undifferentiated 42 61.0
Metastasis after surgery
+ 44 52.3 0.191
− 34 55.9
Serum CEA level
>5 ng/ml 45 47.2 0.699
≤5 ng/ml 33 59.5
Serum CA19-9 level
>37 U/ml 48 52.1 0.312
≤37 U/ml 30 56.7
HBV infection
+ 40 50.0 0.249
− 38 57.0
SFRP1 expression
Negative 52 73.1 <0.0001
Positive 26 15.4
β-catenin expression
Negative 25 20 <0.01
Positive 53 69.8
Open in a new tab

Table 5. Multivariate Cox regression analysis of prognostic markers in 78 patients with biliary tract cancer.

Factors Category X2 P HR* 95% CI*
Histological type Adenocarcinoma/Papillary carcinoma 0.004 0.951 0.954 0.209–4.358
Mucoid carcinoma/Papillary carcinoma 0.029 0.866 1.174 0.182–7.558
Lymph node invasion Absent 0.597 0.440 0.755 0.370–1.540
Present
SFRP1 expression Positive 12.351 <0.0001 10.514 2.831–39.048
Negative
β-catenin expression Negative 2.512 0.113 0.416 0.141–1.231
Positive
Open in a new tab

*HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval.

Discussion

BTC is a rapidly progressive disease with a poor prognosis and an emerging trend of increased incidence [27]–[29]. Patients with BTC have no obvious early symptoms due to its anatomical and physiological characteristics and therefore are usually diagnosed at an advanced stage. Though advances have been made in the understanding of BTC, the treatment of this lethal disease is still unsatisfactory. Thus, finding prognostic indicators is important both to improve early diagnosis and to ameliorate the prognosis for BTC.

Aberrant activity of the Wnt signaling pathway has been observed in a variety of human cancers [16]–[24]. Aberrant activation of the Wnt pathway results in the stabilization and/or altered localization of β-catenin, which presumably promotes tumorigenesis by exacerbating the transcription of growth-controlling genes [10]–[12]. Altered localization of β-catenin is a hallmark of Wnt signaling pathway and serves as a marker of pathway activation [14]. In our study, positive β-catenin expression was observed in 67.9% of BTC samples, with only 22.2% positive expression in normal biliary tract specimens. We demonstrate that β-catenin expression in BTC is also markedly related to histological type, lymph node invasion and TNM stage. Patients with positive β-catenin expression have a significantly poorer overall survival rate. These results are consistent with studies of other cancers in which β-catenin expression is associated with unfavourable prognosis [13]–[15] and suggest that the abnormal activation of the Wnt signaling pathway in BTC participates in the progression of the disease.

The putative role of the Wnt signaling pathway in BTC is further supported by immunohistochemical staining of SFRP1, an inhibitor of Wnt signaling [30]. Our study suggested that SFRP1 localization in BTC is predominately cytoplasmic perinuclear, consistent with a previous study of bladder cancer [31]; however, the localization appears uniformly cytoplasmic in immunohistochemical staining of several other tissues in other studies[32]–[33]. The reason for this difference is not known, but could be related to the tissue-specific expression of alternate RP-interacting proteins. Silencing of SFRP1 in cancer has been widely reported [18]–[25], [34], indicating that aberrant inactivation of SFRP1 might be a common mechanism to activate Wnt signaling in solid tumours. We observed that SFRP1expression was reduced in about 70% of BTC specimens, and its expression showed a clear inverse correlation with that of β-catenin expression by Spearman rank correlation analysis. Moreover, SFRP1 expression was significantly associated with histological type and lymph node invasion. Most importantly, patients with negative SFRP1 expression were shown to have a significantly poor overall survival rate as assessed by univariate analysis, and SFRP1 was verified as an independent prognostic factor by multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazard regression model.

The molecular cause of SFRP1 loss has not been elucidated; however, epigenetic silencing of gene regulatory regions may be one of the underlying causes for the dysregulation of the Wnt signaling pathway [34]. Recently, a series of studies have confirmed that promoter hypermethylation mediates SFRP1 gene silencing. Related mechanisms have been described in colon cancer [35]–[37], ovarian cancer [18], bladder cancer [38], human mesothelioma [20], prostate cancer [24], lung cancer [39] and most recently, cholangiocarcinoma [40]–[41]. Interestingly, a direct link exists between the epigenetic inactivation of SFRP1 and the overexpression of microRNA (miR)-31, with exogenous overexpression of miR-31 leading to repression of SFRP1 in lung cancer cells [42]. Several other miRNAs are associated with the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways in cancer development [43], and it will be of interest to determine whether these miRNAs also correlate with SFRP1 expression and whether miR-31 may regulate SFRP1 or vice versa.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 81170426) and Heilongjiang Province Science and Technology Preferred Projects (2011, no. 297). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1. Groen PC, Gores GJ, LaRusso NF, Gunderson LL, Nagorney DM (2000) Biliary tract cancers. N Engl J Med 342: 663–664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Shaib Y, El-Serag HB (2004) The epidemiology of cholangiocarcinoma. Semin Liver Dis 24: 115–125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Khan SA, Thomas HC, Davidson BR, Taylor-Robinson SD (2005) Cholangiocarcinoma. Lancet 366: 1303–1314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Blechacz B, Gores GJ (2008) Cholangiocarcinoma: advances in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. Hepatology 48: 308–321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Malhi H, Gores GJ (2006) Cholangiocarcinoma: modern advances in understanding a deadly old disease. J Hepatol 45: 856–867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Jarnaqin WR, Shoup M (2004) Surgical management of cholangiocarcinoma. Semin. Liver Dis 24: 189–199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Blechacz B, Gores GJ (2008) Cholangiocarcinoma: advances in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. Hepatology 48: 308–321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Cadiqan KM, Nusse R (1997) Wnt signaling: a common theme in animal development. Genes Dev. 11: 3286–3305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Zong Y, Stanger BZ (2011) Molecular mechanisms of bile duct development. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 43: 257–264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Behrens J, von Kries JP, Kuhl M, Bruhn L, Wedlich D, et al. (1996) Functional interaction of β-catenin with the transcription factor LEF-1. Nature 382: 638–642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Mann B, Gelos M, Siedow A, Hanski ML, Gratchev A, et al. (1999) Target genes of β-catenin-T cell-factor/lymphoid-enhancer-factor signaling in human colorectal carcinomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 1603–1608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Tetsu O, McCormick F (1999) β-catenin regulates expression of cyclin D1 in colon carcinoma cells. Nature 398: 422–426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Giles RH, van Es JH, Clevers H (2003) Caught up in a Wnt storm: Wnt signaling in cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta 1653: 1–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Lustig B, Behrens J (2003) The Wnt signaling pathway and its role in tumor development. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 129: 199–221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Wong CM, Fan ST, Ng IO (2001) β-catenin mutation and overexpression in hepatocellular carcinoma: clinicopathologic and prognostic significance. Cancer 92: 136–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Uren A, Reichsman F, Anest V, Taylor WG, Muraiso K, et al. (2000) Secreted frizzled-related protein-1 binds directly to Wingless and is a biphasic modulator of Wnt signaling. J Biol Chem 275: 4374–4382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Bafico A, Gazit A, Pramila T, Finch PW, Yaniv A, et al. (1999) Interaction of frizzled related protein (FRP) with Wnt ligands and the frizzled receptor suggests alternative mechanisms for FRP inhibition of Wnt signaling. J Biol Chem 274: 16180–16187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Takada T, Yagi Y, Maekita T, Imura M, Nakagawa S, et al. (2004) Methylation-associated silencing of the Wnt antagonist SFRP1 gene in human ovarian cancers. Cancer Sci 95: 741–744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Stoehr R, Wissmann C, Suzuki H, Knuechel R, Krieg RC, et al. (2004) Deletions of chromosome 8p and loss of sFRP1 expression are progression markers of papillary bladder cancer. Lab Invest 84: 465–478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Lee AY, He B, You L, Dadfarmay S, Xu Z, et al. (2004) Expression of the secreted frizzled-related protein gene family is downregulated in human mesothelioma. Oncogene 23: 6672–6676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Ugolini F, Charafe-Jauffret E, Bardou VJ, Geneix J, Adelaide J, et al. (2001) WNT pathway and mammary carcinogenesis: loss of expression of candidate tumor suppressor gene SFRP1 in most invasive carcinomas except of the medullary type. Oncogene 20: 5810–5817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Klopocki E, Kristiansen G, Wild PJ, Klaman I, Castanos-Velez E, et al. (2004) Loss of SFRP1 is associated with breast cancer progression and poor prognosis in early stage tumors. Int J Oncol 25: 641–649. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Zou H, Molina JR, Harrington JJ, Osborn NK, Klatt KK, et al. (2005) Aberrant methylation of secreted frizzled-related protein genes in esophageal adenocarcinoma and Barrett's esophagus. Int J Cancer 116: 584–591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Lodygin D, Epanchintsev A, Menssen A, Diebold J, Hermeking H (2005) Functional epigenomics identifies genes frequently silenced in prostate cancer. Cancer Res 65: 4218–4227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Byun T, Karimi M, Marsh JL, Milovanovic T, Lin F, et al. (2005) Expression of secreted Wnt antagonists in gastrointestinal tissues: potential role in stem cell homeostasis. J Clin Pathol 58: 515–519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Andresen K, Boberg KM, Vedeld HM, Honne H, Hektoen M, et al. (2012) Novel target genes and a valid biomarker panel identified for cholangiocarcinoma. Epigenetics 7: 1249–1257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Yan D, Wallingford JB, Sun TQ, Nelson AM, Sakanaka C, et al. (2001) Cell autonomous regulation of multiple disheveled-dependent pathways by mammalian Nkd. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 3802–3807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fraumeni JF Jr, Devesa SS, McLaughlin JK, Stanford JL (1996) Biliary tract cancer. In: D.Schottenfeld and J.F.Fraumeni, Jr(eds.), Cancer epidemiology and prevention (Ed.2) Oxford University Press, New York 794–805. [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Hsing AW, Gao YT, Devesa SS, Jin F, Fraumeni JF Jr (1998) Rising incidence of biliary tract cancer in Shanghai, China. Int. J. Cancer 73: 368–370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Feinberg AP, Tycko B (2004) The history of cancer epigenetics. Nat Rev Cancer 4: 143–153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Stoehr R, Wissmann C, Suzuki H, Knuechel R, Krieg RC, et al. (2004) Deletions of chromosome 8p and loss of sFRP1 expression are progression markers of papillary bladder cancer. Lab Invest 84: 465–478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. You J, Wen L, Roufas A, Madigan MC, Sutton G (2013) Expression of SFRP Family Proteins in Human Keratoconus Corneas. Plos One 18: 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Huang J, Zhang YL, Teng XM, Lin Y, Zheng DL, et al. (2007) Down-regulation of SFRP1 as a putative tumor suppressor gene can contribute to human hepatocellularcarcinoma. BMC Cancer 7: 126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Finch PW, He X, Kelley MJ, Uren A, Schaudies RP, et al. (1997) Purification and molecular cloning of a secreted, Frizzled-related antagonist of Wnt action. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 6770–6775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Suzuki H, Gabrielson E, Chen W, Anbazhagan R, van Engeland M, et al. (2002) A genomic screen for genes upregulated by demethylation and histone deacetylase inhibition in human colorectal cancer. Nat Genet 31: 141–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Caldwell GM, Jones C, Gensberg K, Jan S, Hardy RG, et al. (2004) The Wnt antagonist sFRP1 in colorectal tumorigenesis. Cancer Res 64: 883–888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Suzuki H, Gabrielson E, Chen W, Anbazhagan R, van Engeland M, et al. (2002) A genomic screen for genes upregulated by demethylation and histone deacetylase inhibition in human colorectal cancer. Nat Genet 31: 141–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Marsit CJ, Karagas MR, Andrew A, Liu M, Danaee H, et al. (2005) Epigenetic inactivation of SFRP genes and TP53 alteration act jointly as markers of invasive bladder cancer. Cancer Res 65: 7081–7085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Suzuki M, Shigematsu H, Nakajima T, Kubo R, Motohashi S, et al. (2007) Synchronous alterations of Wnt and epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathways through aberrant methylation and mutation in non small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 13: 6087–6092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Goeppert B, Konermann C, Schmidt CR, Bogatyrova O, Geiselhart L, et al. (2013) Global alterations of DNA methylation in cholangiocarcinoma targets the Wnt signaling pathway. Hepatology 59: 544–548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Andresen K, Boberg KM, Vedeld HM, Honne H, Hektoen M, et al. (2012) Novel target genes and a valid biomarker panel identified for cholangiocarcinoma. Epigenetics 7: 1249–1257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Xi S, Yang M, Tao Y, Xu H, Shan J, et al. (2010) Cigarette Smoke Induces C/EBP-b -Mediated Activation of miR-31 in Normal Human Respiratory Epithelia and Lung Cancer Cell. Plos One 29: 5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Sun X, He Y, Huang C, Ma TT, Li J (2013) Distinctive microRNA signature associated of neoplasms with the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Cell Signal 25: 2805–2811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES