Skip to main content
Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research logoLink to Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research
. 2012 May 3;2(1):10–14. doi: 10.1016/S2212-4268(12)60004-9

Two wound-covering materials in the surgical treatment of oral submucous fibrosis: a clinical comparison

Harsha Pradhan a,*, Hemant Gupta b, VP Sinha c, Sumit Gupta d, MC Shashikanth e
PMCID: PMC3941626  PMID: 25756025

Abstract

Introduction

Oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF), a chronic debilitating condition of the mouth, has been treated both surgically and non-surgically, but non-surgical methods yield inconsistent results. The surgical methods essentially comprise of bilateral sectioning of fibrous bands with or without coronoidectomy followed by covering of the surgical defect with a graft or a wound dressing material such as collagen sheet.

Materials and Methods

This study comprised 30 clinically diagnosed cases of OSMF. This study compared transposition of buccal pad fat graft with collagen sheet to cover the defect within the following parameters: pain, swelling, mouth opening, color of mucosa, palpability of fibrous bands, and suppleness of mucosa.

Results

We found significant difference in the postoperative mouth opening, an insignificant difference for post surgical morbidity and higher grades of surgical convenience in using collagen sheet as a wound dressing material.

Conclusion

Collagen membrane is a superior method compared to transposition of the buccal pad of fat as a graft to cover the surgical wound in the treatment of OSMF of grade III and above.

Keywords: Buccal fat pad, collagen sheet, oral precancer, oral submucous fibrosis

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (744.5 KB).

References

  • 1.Mukherjee AL. Oral submucous fibrosis. A search for aetiology. Ind J Otolaryngol. 1972;24:11–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kavarana NM, Bhathena HM. Surgery for severe trismus in submucous fibrosis. Br J Plast Surg. 1987;40:407–409. doi: 10.1016/0007-1226(87)90045-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Borle RM, Nimonkar PV, Rajan R. Extended nasolabial flaps in the management of oral submucous fibrosis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;47:382–385. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2008.08.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Canniff JP, Harvey W, Harris M. Oral submucous fibrosis: its pathogenesis and management. Br Dent J. 1986;160:429–434. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4805876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Neder A. Use of buccal fat pad for grafts. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1983;55:349–350. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(83)90187-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Egyedi P. Utilization of the buccal fat pad for closure of oroantral and/or oro-nasal communications. J Maxillofac Surg. 1977;5:241–244. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0503(77)80117-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tideman H, Boanquet A, Scott J. Use of the buccal fat pad as a pedicled graft. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986;44:435–440. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(86)80007-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pradhan R. Use of buccal fat pad for reconstruction in maxillofacial surgery. Ind J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;16:7–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mehrotra D, Pradhan R, Gupta S. Retrospective comparison of surgical treatment modalities in 100 patients with oral submucous fibrosis. J Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Oral Surg Endod. 2009;107:e1–e10. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Paramhans D, Mathur RK, Newaskar V, Shukla S, Sudrania MM. Role of collagen membrane for reconstruction of buccal defects following fibrotic band excision and coronoidectomy in oral submucous fibrosis 2010.
  • 11.Paramhans D, Mathur RK, Newaskar V, Shukla S, Sudrania MK. Role of collagen membrane for reconstruction of buccal defects following fibrotic band excision and coronoidectomy in oral submucous fibrosis. MP Soc Otolaryngol Waent. 2010:3. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lee JT, Cheng LF, Chen PR. Bipaddled radial forearm flap for the reconstruction of bilateral buccal defects in oral submucous fibrosis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;36:615–619. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2007.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pruitt BA, Jr, Levine NS. Characteristics and uses of biologic dressings and skin substitutes. Arch Surg. 1984;119:312–322. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1984.01390150050013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Peer LA. The neglected ‘free fat graft’, its behavior and clinical use. Am J Surg. 1956;92:40. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(56)80009-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Peer LA. The neglected free fat graft. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1956;18:233–250. doi: 10.1097/00006534-195610000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Le PV, Gornitsky M. Oral stent as treatment adjunct for oral submucous fibrosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1996;81:148–150. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(96)80404-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES