Abstract
The Frankfort horizontal is a useful compromise for studying skulls but not for orienting the natural head position (NHP) in the living because it is normally distributed around a true extracranial horizontal. Nonetheless, orthodontists dealing with living subjects, rather than inert crania, have used this Frankfort horizontal faithfully in cephalometry. Because the cant or inclination of all intracranial reference lines is subjected to biologic variation, they are unsuitable for meaningful cephalometric analysis. Registration of head posture in its natural position has the advantage that an extracranial vertical or a horizontal perpendicular to that vertical can be used as reference line for cephalometric analysis. Purpose of this paper is to provide an updated review of various methods to reproduce and record the NHP.
Keywords: Natural head position, radiographic cephalometry, true vertical line
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (85.3 KB).
References
- 1.Craniometrische konferenz zu Frankfurt Vestandigung uber ein geneinsames craniometrisches Verfahren (Frankfurter verstandigung) Archiv F Anthropologie. 1884;15:1–8. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Moorrees CFA, Kean MR. Natural head position: a basic consideration in the interpretation of cephalometric radiographs. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1958;16:213–234. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Downs WB. Analysis of dentofacial profile. Angle Orthod. 1956;26:192–212. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bjerin RA. Comparison between the Frankfort horizontal and the sella tursica-nasion as reference planes in cephalometric analysis. Acta Odont Scand. 1957;15:1–12. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Thurow RC. Atlas of Orthodontic Principles. 2nd edn. CV Mosby; St Louis: 1977. pp. 290–299. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bjork A. Some biological aspects of prognathism and occlusion of the teeth. Angle Orthod. 1951;21:3–27. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1951)021<0003:SBAOPA>2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.McNamara JA., Jr Component of class II malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age. Angle Orthod. 1981;51:177–202. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1981)051<0177:COCIMI>2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Molhave A. A Biostatic Investigation: the Standing Posture of Man Theoretically and Statometrically Illustrated. Ejnar Munksgaard; Copenhagen: 1958. pp. 291–300. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cooke MS, Wei SHY. The reproducibility of natural head posture: a methodological study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1988;93:280–288. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(88)90157-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lundstrom F, Lundstrom A. Natural head position as a basis cephalometric analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1992;101:244–247. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(92)70093-P. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dvortsin DP, Ye Q, Pruim GJ, Dijkstra PU, Ren Y. Reliability of the integrated radiograph-photograph method to obtain natural head position in cephalometric diagnosis. Angle Orthod. 2011;81:889–894. doi: 10.2319/010411-2.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Solow B, Tallgren A. Natural head position in standing subjects. Acta Odontol Scand. 1971;29:591–607. doi: 10.3109/00016357109026337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Eliasson S. Postural position of the mandible with ear plug fixation and light cross-orientation. Swedish Dental J. 1977;1:39–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bister D, Edler RJ, Tom DDM. Natural head posture-considerations of reproducibility. Eur J Orthod. 2002;24:457–470. doi: 10.1093/ejo/24.5.457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ahangar-Atashi MH, Kachoei M. Effect of chin position on natural head orientation reproducibility. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011;16:e317–e322. doi: 10.4317/medoral.16.e317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Vig PS, Showfety KJ, Phillips C. Experimental manipulation of head posture. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1980;77:258–268. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(80)90081-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Showfety KJ, Vig PS, Matteson S. A simple method for taking natural head position cephalogram. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1983;83:495–500. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Raju NS, Prashad KG, Jayade VP. A modified approach for obtaining cephalogram in natural head position. J Orthodont. 2001;28:25–28. doi: 10.1093/ortho/28.1.25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bass NM. Measurement of the profile angle and the aesthetic analysis of the facial profile. J Orthodont. 2003;30:3–9. doi: 10.1093/ortho/30.1.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Xia JJ, McGrory JK, Gateno J. A new method to orient 3-dimensional computed tomography models to the natural head position: a clinical feasibility study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69:584–591. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.10.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Huggare JAV. A natural head position technique for radiographic cephalometry. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1993;22:74–77. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.22.2.8375558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Moorrees CFA. Natural head position-a revival. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1994;105:512–513. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70014-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wamalwa P, Amisi SK, Wang Y, Chen S. Angular photogrammetric comparison of the soft-tissue facial profile of Kenyans and Chinese. J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22:1064–1072. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31821075d8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Usumez S, Uysal T, Orhan M, Soganci E. Relationship between static natural head position and head position measured during walking. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006;129:42–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.09.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]