Skip to main content
Journal of Neurotrauma logoLink to Journal of Neurotrauma
. 2013 May 1;30(9):775–788. doi: 10.1089/neu.2012.2391

Detection of Structural and Metabolic Changes in Traumatically Injured Hippocampus by Quantitative Differential Proteomics

Ping Wu 1, Yingxin Zhao 2,6,7,8, Sigmund J Haidacher 2,5,6, Enyin Wang 1, Margaret O Parsley 3, Junling Gao 1, Rovshan G Sadygov 4,7,8, Jonathan M Starkey 4, Bruce A Luxon 4,7,8, Heidi Spratt 4,7,8, Douglas S DeWitt 3, Donald S Prough 3, Larry Denner 2,5,6,7,8,
PMCID: PMC3941921  PMID: 22757692

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a complex and common problem resulting in the loss of cognitive function. In order to build a comprehensive knowledge base of the proteins that underlie these cognitive deficits, we employed unbiased quantitative mass spectrometry, proteomics, and bioinformatics to identify and quantify dysregulated proteins in the CA3 subregion of the hippocampus in the fluid percussion model of TBI in rats. Using stable isotope 18O-water differential labeling and multidimensional tandem liquid chromatography (LC)-MS/MS with high stringency statistical analyses and filtering, we identified and quantified 1002 common proteins, with 124 increased and 76 decreased. The Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) bioinformatics tool identified that TBI had profound effects on downregulating global energy metabolism, including glycolysis, the Krebs cycle, and oxidative phosphorylation, as well as cellular structure and function. Widespread upregulation of actin-related cytoskeletal dynamics was also found. IPA indicated a common integrative signaling node, calcineurin B1 (CANB1, CaNBα, or PPP3R1), which was downregulated by TBI. Western blotting confirmed that the calcineurin regulatory subunit, CANB1, and its catalytic binding partner PP2BA, were decreased without changes in other calcineurin subunits. CANB1 plays a critical role in downregulated networks of calcium signaling and homeostasis through calmodulin and calmodulin-dependent kinase II to highly interconnected structural networks dominated by tubulins. This large-scale knowledge base lays the foundation for the identification of novel therapeutic targets for cognitive rescue in TBI.

Key words: animal models, bioinformatics, mass spectrometry, proteomics, traumatic brain injury

Introduction

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an important problem due to the serious pathophysiological processes that contribute tremendous health burdens to millions of patients, their relatives, and caregivers.12,61,71,79 Clearly TBI also causes a broader spectrum of symptoms and permanent disabilities, including impaired motor, sensory, cognitive, mood, sleep, and other functions. Primary injury and secondary damages contribute to the loss of neurons and oligodendrocytes, degeneration of dendrites and axons, loss of synaptic connections, destruction of the vasculature and blood–brain barrier, and infiltration of immune cells. Since little can be done once the initial injury has occurred, efforts have been focused on finding ways to prevent or minimize secondary damage. The field now has a rich description of the events and processes that have been implicated in TBI, including inflammation, edema/ischemia, oxidative stress, excitotoxicity, neurogenesis, angiogenesis, synaptogenesis, endogenous stem cells, and glial scar formation using traditional reductionistic experimental approaches.8,9,22,25,40,43,52,58,63,74,75

Comprehensive and integrative approaches to investigate these diverse mechanisms have only been described recently and to a limited extent. The value of an unbiased, global, systems biology analysis of dysregulated protein expression is well-documented and often provides novel insights into information processing that occurs at a higher level of emergent principles than can be appreciated from the analysis of a handful of signaling molecules in isolation.62,70 Mass spectrometry and 2D gel electrophoresis have been successfully employed to discover biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid or serum from adult and pediatric TBI patients.7,11,13,19,23,24,26,37,53,77,83 While the identification of biomarkers is important to bring novel tools to the diagnosis and management of recovery after TBI, these markers rarely provide insight into the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of TBI.

The learning and memory deficits consequent to TBI are well established.6,14,15,45 The detailed mechanisms that subserve learning and memory include proper regulation and integration of synaptic structure and function to maintain efficacious information processing. Several integrative inter- and intracellular processes contribute to this complex phenomenon. The hippocampus is an essential region required for the acquisition and consolidation of learning before more permanent storage in other cortical brain structures. The molecular processes underlying these early events in memory formation are diverse and distributive, including metabolic sequelae, structural maintenance and reorganization, nuclear gene transcription, and protein synthesis, processing, and post-translational modification, as well as directed transport of cargo molecules into or out of the soma, axons, dendrites, and spines. Information processing, ultimately occurring through synaptic transmission between neurons, is finely regulated by other important cells in the central nervous system. These complex events are reflected in convergent regulation of signaling pathways and networks that determine how information is received, processed, and propagated, while ultimately affecting subsequent responses to additional information.

Among the key debilitating aspects of TBI are the learning and memory deficits due to the injury. Because the hippocampus has an essential role in learning and memory, proteomics studies in this area using gel-based analyses provide additional insights.33,38 Previously, we reported that grafting human neural stem cells (hNSCs) into the injured hippocampus acutely improved cognitive function of TBI rats.18 However, the underling mechanisms remain elusive, and require a basic knowledge of how TBI changes the overall systems biology of protein expression in the host hippocampus. Because of the varied signaling pathways, unique cellular architecture, and electrophysiological properties within each of the subregions of the hippocampus, in this study we focused particularly on the CA3 region, which is the gateway for information flow into and processing within the hippocampus. Our unbiased approach to delineate higher level signaling networks dysregulated by TBI in the CA3 region of the hippocampus has provided novel, previously unappreciated insights to the systemic level of dysfunction, and their underlying reductionistic mechanisms, in a brain region important for the initial stage of learning and memory that contribute to such challenging outcomes in TBI.70

Methodologically, stable isotope labeling combined with mass spectrometry provides a quantitative, sensitive, and accurate tool for the quantitative measurement of changes resulting from a targeted perturbation of a biological system,49 and is becoming the gold standard for quantitative proteomics.20,51,65 A variety of metabolic, chemical, and enzymatic methods have been developed for stable isotope labeling.21,50 Here, we used stable isotope 18O-water differential labeling,27,78 2D liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (2D-LC-MS/MS), and bioinformatics tools to identify proteins that are unaffected, upregulated, and downregulated in the CA3 region of the hippocampus by TBI in a rat fluid percussion model. This systems biology approach provides a higher-level knowledge base of the integrative molecular mechanisms of TBI, insights into key regulatory networks and their regulatory nodes, and lays the groundwork for the discovery of novel therapeutic strategies.

Methods

Animals and fluid percussion traumatic brain injury

Fluid percussion was used to create TBI in rats according to our previous description with minor modifications.18 All procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Texas Medical Branch, and were performed under aseptic conditions in compliance with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Ten male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats (300 g; Charles River Laboratories International, Inc., Wilmington, MA) were randomly divided into two groups: sham and TBI, five rats per group.

Briefly, isoflurane-anesthetized rats were subjected to parasagittal fluid percussion TBI according to our previous descriptions.4,16,18 Rectal and temporalis muscle temperatures were monitored throughout the surgery. Sham-injured rats were connected to the fluid percussion trauma device without injury. TBI rats were subjected to injury (2.0–2.1 atm) by a rapid injection of saline driven by the descent of a pendulum from a controlled height. The average time to recover the righting reflex in these injured rats was 17 min. To make a comparison of the current proteomics analysis with our previous transplantation studies, all animals received 1 μL vehicle injection into the hippocampal region on the injury side 1 day after TBI, and received cyclosporine in the drinking water as previously described.18

Tissue processing, protein extraction, tryptic digestion and 18O-labeling

Four days after TBI the hippocampus ipsilateral to the injury was removed and the CA3 dissected from the remainder of the hippocampus under magnification with a dissecting microscope and processed as previously described.57,62,67,70,81 The 4-day time point was chosen because: (1) it is between the peaks of injury-induced inflammation60 and of reactive astrogliosis,55 (2) there are metabolic changes during this time,31,34 and (3) it allows settlement of grafted and host cells after surgery for future studies aimed to compare TBI-injured animals with and without cell transplantation. Given that fluid percussion injury affects both the ipsilateral and contralateral sides of an injured brain,42 we focused on comparing the proteomic profile of the injury side to that of a sham control.

Briefly, Trizol-extracted and precipitated proteins were dissolved in guanidinium HCl. In each experimental group, 300 μg of protein from each of 5 sham rats and 5 TBI rats were pooled. The two pools, containing 1.5 mg of protein each, were separately reduced and alkylated followed by digestion with trypsin.

The 18O-labeling was performed as previously described57,62 with slight modifications. Briefly, the paired experimental peptide samples were resuspended in normal water (H216O) for sham, or heavy water (H218O) for TBI, containing ammonium bicarbonate and immobilized trypsin. The corresponding 18O-labeled and 16O-unlabeled samples were pooled, dried, and desalted.

Two-dimensional liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry

Pooled differentially-labeled peptides were separated and analyzed as previously described.57,62 Briefly, the pools were resolved into 60 fractions by strong cation exchange chromatography. Each fraction was then analyzed in triplicate using LC-MS/MS performed with an LTQ linear ion trap mass spectrometer (ThermoFinnigan, San Jose, CA) equipped with a nanospray source with an on-line ProteomX® nano-HPLC system (ThermoFinnigan). The mass spectrometer was operated in the data-dependent triple play mode. The three most intense ions in each MS survey scan were automatically selected for Zoomscan and MS/MS.

Data processing

The acquired MS/MS spectra were processed as previously described using MassXplorer developed in our laboratory.57 Briefly, spectra were searched against a composite target-decoy rat protein database consisting of the target and decoy (reversed) protein sequences downloaded from the SWISSPROT Protein Database with the SEQUEST algorithm using the Bioworks 3.2 platform (ThermoFinnigan).

The zoom scan data were used to calculate the relative abundance ratios of 18O-labeled peptide/16O-unlabeled peptide pairs using MassXplorer.57 We used power spectrum transformation to remove high-frequency noise and contributions from co-eluting species, to determine the elemental composition of the sequences to compute theoretical isotopic distributions for determination of peak positions, and for curve fitting to calculate the ratios.

Statistical analysis

Peptides with charge>3, false-discovery rate>3%, 18O:16O ratios<0.1 or>10, and reversed sequences, were removed from further analysis. Calculated peptide ratios were log2 transformed and mean centered prior to statistical analysis. Significance was determined by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test (due to concerns regarding data distribution), with Benjamini-Hochberg false-discovery rate correction for multiple testing comparisons as indicated.5 Finally, the data were analyzed through the use of Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA®; Ingenuity Systems, Redwood City, CA), with a significance cutoff of p≤0.05 and 20% change in protein expression. The lines between proteins in Figures 2, 3, and 5 represent relationships derived from IPA Network Explorer and Canonical Pathways in the Ingenuity Knowledge Base, with further definitions available at www.ingenuity.com.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Highest scoring upregulated network: Cellular Assembly. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis of upregulated proteins shows extensive dysregulation of cytoskeletal proteins in traumatic brain injury (TBI). All listed proteins are significantly changed by TBI compared to sham controls (p≤0.05 by Benjamini-Hochberg rank-sum statistical analysis). Lines between proteins represent relationships derived from the IPA Network Explorer and Canonical Pathways in the Ingenuity Knowledge Base (ERMA, ermin; INA, alpha internexin; LMNA, lamin-A; MAP2, microtubule associated protein 2; MYH9, myosin-9; MYH10, myosin-10; NEFH, NEFM, NEFL, neurofilaments heavy, medium, and light; PLEC, plektin-1; PRPH, peripherin; SPTAN1, spectrin alpha chain, brain; SYN1, synapsin-1; VIM, vimentin);

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Highest-scoring downregulated network: Energy Production, Metabolism and Cell Structure. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis of downregulated proteins shows substantial dysregulation of ATP-related enzymes, the 14-3-3 (YWHA proteins), signaling intermediates, and tubulins, in traumatic brain injury (TBI). All listed proteins are significantly changed by TBI compared to sham controls (p≤0.05 by Benjamini-Hochberg rank-sum statistical analysis). Lines between proteins represent relationships derived from IPA Network Explorer and Canonical Pathways in the Ingenuity Knowledge Base (ATP1A1 and ATP1A3, sodium/potassium-transporting ATPase subunits alpha-1 and alpha-3; ATP5A1, ATP5B, ATP5F1, ATP5O, ATP synthase subunits alpha, beta, b, and O; CAMK2D, calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II delta chain; PFN1, profilin-1; SLC-8A1, sodium/calcium exchanger 1; SLC25A4, ADP/ATP translocase 1; TUBA1A, TUBA1B, TUBB2A, TUBB2C, TUBB3, tubulin alpha-1A, alpha-1B, beta-2A, beta-2C, and beta-3; YWHAB, YWHAE, YWHAZ, 14-3-3 β, ɛ, and ζ; NF-κB, nuclear factor-κB).

FIG. 5.

FIG. 5.

Downregulated network of CANB1 in traumatic brain injury (TBI). Network analysis indicating coordinate dysregulation of calcineurins, calcium, and structural proteins. Lines between proteins represent relationships derived from Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) Network Explorer and Canonical Pathways in the Ingenuity Knowledge Base (CANB1, PPP3R1, calcineurin subunit B type 1; PPP3CA, PP2BA, serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit alpha; PPP3CB, PP2BB, serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B catalytic subunit beta; PPP3R2, CANB2, calcineurin subunit B type 2; TUB-A1A, TUB-A1B, TUB-BB1, TUB-BB2A, TUB-BB2C, TUB-BB3, tubulins A1A, A1B, BB1, BB2A, BB2C, BB3; CaMKII, calcium calmodulin-dependent protein kinase 2 delta).

These studies were performed to identify the most robust, consistent changes that emerge in a population of animals (TBI or sham) without the idiosyncratic differences of individual animals. Thus we used five biological replicates per group to generate results that are reflective of the populations of animals with and without TBI. Further, the small amount of material in the CA3 of an individual animal, in conjunction with the extensive sample handling and mass spectrometry analyses, prevented the comparison of individual animals. To minimize the false-positive identification of differential expression, we required high-stringency filtering limits of mass spectrometry data, multiple peptide hits per protein with multiple measures, and highly rigorous statistical treatment of peptide and protein expression, as well as differential expression values. Similar rigorous approaches have been successfully used in several other valuable and important neuroproteomics studies.37,53

Western blot analysis

Further validation was carried out to quantitatively detect the protein expression levels of four calcineurin subunits and isoforms. Western blot analysis was performed as previously described.66 Briefly, 5 or 50 μg of protein samples were probed with isoform and subunit specific primary antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA), including polyclonal goat anti-PP2B-Aα (PP2BA; 1:200), anti-PP2B-Aβ (PP2BB; 1:200), anti-PP2B-B1 (CaNB1; 1:200), and anti-PP2B-B2 (CaNB2; 1:200). Blots were probed simultaneously with β-actin (1:20,000; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) as a loading control. Following stripping (Restore™; Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL), the blots were reprobed for a second control, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH, 1:1,000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies were used at dilutions of 1:5000–1:10,000 (GE Healthcare, Hertfordshire, U.K.). ECL hyperfilms (Amersham Biosciences, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, U.K.) were subsequently scanned, and densitometry analyses were performed with AlphaEase FC Software (Alpha Innotech, Santa Clara, CA). All data were normalized against β-actin or GAPDH and compared among blots. Statistical significance between groups was determined using Student's t-test.

Results

Quantitative proteomics strategy

In these studies, hippocampal CA3 tissue was extracted from TBI rats at ∼ 5 months of age. Differential stable isotope labeling was performed on tryptic peptides from TBI samples labeled with 18O-water, while peptides from control samples contained normal 16O. Using our recently developed spectral analysis program for quantification of 18O:16O peptide ratios, MassXplorer,57 we quantified expression of 38,135 peptide ratios (Supplemental Table S1; see online supplementary material at http://www.liebertonline.com). After filtering, 33,303 peptides were used for calculation of relative protein expression. To increase the quality of the proteins subjected to further analysis, we used the additional criteria of at least 2 distinct peptides and 3 total measurements to identify and quantify 1002 proteins common to the sham and TBI samples, the majority of which were unchanged by TBI (Supplemental Table S2; see online supplementary material at http://www.liebertonline.com). Determination of significance yielded 200 proteins dysregulated by TBI. The 124 upregulated proteins (Table 1) were clustered into groups of the actin-related cytoskeleton, neuronal structure and development/reorganization, neuronal transport and neurotransmitter action, and other. Of the 76 proteins significantly downregulated by TBI (Table 2), many were related to energy metabolism (Fig. 1). Nearly all the enzymes of the glycolytic pathway were downregulated. Enzymes regulating flux to and within the Krebs cycle were downregulated, as were many key intermediates of oxidative phosphorylation in the electron transport chain. Large-scale disruption of ATP synthesis and transport was also evident. Finally, key enzymes in calcium signaling and homeostasis were downregulated (Table 2).

Table 1.

Proteins Upregulated by Traumatic Brain Injury

IPA name Ratio Accession no. Uniprot name Protein name
Actin-related
 CAPG 4.01 Q6AYC4 CAPG Macrophage-capping protein
 HLA-C 3.49 P16391 HA12 RT1 class I histocompatibility antigen; AA alpha chain precursor
 TPM4 3.23 P09495 TPM4 Tropomyosin alpha-4 chain
 HSPB1 2.27 P42930 HSPB1 Heat shock protein beta-1
 EVL 2.08 O08719 EVL Ena/VASP-like protein
 CNN3 1.73 P37397 CNN3 Calponin-3
 MARCKS 1.73 P30009 MARCS Myristoylated alanine-rich C-kinase substrate
 SEPT5 1.51 Q9JJM9 SEPT5 Septin-5
 PPP1R9A 1.42 O35867 NEB1 Neurabin-1
 PPP1R9B 1.40 O35274 NEB2 Neurabin-2
 MYH9 1.37 Q62812 MYH9 Myosin-9
 ACTN4 1.26 Q9QXQ0 ACTN4 Alpha-actinin-4
 ACTA2 1.26 P62738 ACTA Actin; aortic smooth muscle
 ACTR2 1.24 Q5M7U6 ARP2 Actin-related protein 2
 MYH10 1.15 Q9JLT0 MYH10 Myosin-10
 ACTB 1.10 P60711 ACTB Actin; cytoplasmic 1
Neuronal structure and development/reorganization
 BCAS1 2.39 Q3ZB98 BCAS1 Breast carcinoma-amplified sequence 1 homolog
 PRPH 2.22 P21807 PERI Peripherin
 VIM 1.93 P31000 VIME Vimentin
 ODF4 1.74 Q6AXT9 ODFP4 Outer dense fiber protein 4
 MAG 1.66 P07722 MAG Myelin-associated glycoprotein precursor
 APP 1.61 P08592 A4 Amyloid beta A4 protein precursor
 GAP43 1.56 P07936 NEUM Neuromodulin
 ERMN 1.54 Q5RJL0 ERMIN Ermin
 DPYSL3 1.47 Q62952 DPYL3 Dihydropyrimidinase-related protein 3
 BCAN 1.44 P55068 PGCB Brevican core protein precursor
 NEFL 1.42 P19527 NFL Neurofilament light polypeptide
 CADM2 1.41 Q1WIM2 CADM2 Cell adhesion molecule 2 precursor
 NEFH 1.41 P16884 NFH Neurofilament heavy polypeptide
 NRCAM 1.39 P97686 NRCAM Neuronal cell adhesion molecule precursor
 BASP1 1.33 Q05175 BASP Brain acid soluble protein 1
 NEFM 1.29 P12839 NFM Neurofilament medium polypeptide
 MBP 1.27 P02688 MBP Myelin basic protein S
 INA 1.24 P23565 AINX Alpha-internexin
 MAP1A 1.24 P34926 MAP1A Microtubule-associated protein 1A
 CNTN1 1.23 Q63198 CNTN1 Contactin-1 precursor
 MAP1B 1.17 P15205 MAP1B Microtubule-associated protein 1B
 MAP2 1.15 P15146 MAP2 Microtubule-associated protein 2
 PLEC 1.11 P30427 PLEC1 Plectin-1
Neuronal transport and neurotransmitter action
 CHGB 3.11 O35314 SCG1 Secretogranin-1 precursor
 TMED10 2.46 Q63584 TMEDA Transmembrane emp24 domain-containing protein 10 precursor
 DYNC1I2 1.98 Q62871 DC1I2 Cytoplasmic dynein 1 intermediate chain 2
 CPNE9 1.83 Q5BJS7 CPNE9 Copine-9
 USO1 1.77 P41542 USO1 General vesicular transport factor p115
 HOMER3 1.49 Q9Z2X5 HOME3 Homer protein homolog 3
 PACSIN1 1.20 Q9Z0W5 PACN1 Protein kinase C and casein kinase substrate in neurons protein
 BSN 1.20 O88778 BSN Protein bassoon
 HSPA5 1.18 P06761 GRP78 78 kDa glucose-regulated protein precursor
 NSF 1.15 Q9QUL6 NSF Vesicle-fusing ATPase
 SYN1 1.08 P09951 SYN1 Synapsin-1
Other
 LONP2 4.67 Q3MIB4 LONP2 Peroxisomal Lon protease homolog 2
 NPTXR 3.54 O35764 NPTXR Neuronal pentraxin receptor
 HBB 3.19 P02091 HBB1 Hemoglobin subunit beta-1
 SLC6A6 3.06 P31643 SC6A6 Sodium- and chloride-dependent taurine transporter
unmapped 2.86 P01836 KACA Ig kappa chain C region; A allele
 PRSS2 2.65 P00763 TRY2 Anionic trypsin-2 precursor
 PZP 2.24 Q63041 A1M Alpha-1-macroglobulin precursor
 C3 2.21 P01026 CO3 Complement C3 precursor
 CST3 2.18 P14841 CYTC Cystatin-C precursor
 LXN 2.10 Q64361 LXN Latexin
 DDX46 1.96 Q62780 DDX46 Probable ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX46
 EIF3B 1.95 Q4G061 EIF3B Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit B
 DUSP4 1.95 Q62767 DUS4 Dual specificity protein phosphatase 4
 RAP1B 1.93 Q62636 RAP1B Ras-related protein Rap-1b precursor
 ATP4A 1.92 P09626 ATP4A Potassium-transporting ATPase alpha chain 1
 SOX10 1.88 O55170 SOX10 Transcription factor SOX-10
 HIST1H1D 1.85 P15865 H12 Histone H1.2
 LMNA 1.81 P48679 LMNA Lamin-A
 RPS20 1.80 P60868 RS20 40S ribosomal protein S20
 PTGES3 1.78 P83868 TEBP Prostaglandin E synthase 3
 GFAP 1.75 P47819 GFAP Glial fibrillary acidic protein
 LRRC8E 1.74 Q3KRC6 LRC8E Leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 8E
 ADCY8 1.73 P40146 ADCY8 Adenylate cyclase type 8
 CLU 1.73 P05371 CLUS Clusterin precursor
 ALB 1.69 P02770 ALBU Serum albumin precursor
 NDUFS4 1.68 Q5XIF3 NDUS4 NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] iron-sulfur protein 4; mitochondrial
 ITM2B 1.67 Q5XIE8 ITM2B Integral membrane protein 2B
 SSRP1 1.66 Q04931 SSRP1 FACT complex subunit SSRP1
 PPP5C 1.64 P53042 PPP5 Serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 5
 GSK3B 1.61 P18266 GSK3B Glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta
 RPL17 1.59 P24049 RL17 60S ribosomal protein L17
 PGRMC1 1.59 P70580 PGRC1 Membrane-associated progesterone receptor component 1
 PDIA4 1.55 P38659 PDIA4 Protein disulfide-isomerase A4 precursor
 GM10117 1.55 P17077 RL9 60S ribosomal protein L9
 NME2 1.54 P19804 NDKB Nucleoside diphosphate kinase B
 HBA1 1.52 P01946 HBA Hemoglobin subunit alpha-1/2
 KHSRP 1.52 Q99PF5 FUBP2 Far upstream element-binding protein 2
 PTK2B 1.51 P70600 FAK2 Protein tyrosine kinase 2 beta
 RPLP2 1.51 P02401 RLA2 60S acidic ribosomal protein P2
 PDIA6 1.50 Q63081 PDIA6 Protein disulfide-isomerase A6 precursor
 PIP4K2B 1.49 O88377 PI42B Phosphatidylinositol-5-phosphate 4-kinase type-2 beta
 STIP1 1.49 O35814 STIP1 Stress-induced-phosphoprotein 1
 GPD1 1.46 O35077 GPDA Glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase [NAD+]; cytoplasmic
 AKAP12 1.45 Q5QD51 AKA12 A-kinase anchor protein 12
 RNPEP 1.41 O09175 AMPB Aminopeptidase B
 DBI 1.40 P11030 ACBP Acyl-CoA-binding protein
 ANXA3 1.40 P14669 ANXA3 Annexin A3
 HCG 25371 1.39 Q5M9I5 QCR6 Cytochrome b-c1 complex subunit 6; mitochondrial precursor
 HNRNPH1 1.39 Q8VHV7 HNRH1 Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein H
 ABI1 1.39 Q9QZM5 ABI1 Abl interactor 1
 ACSBG1 1.39 Q924N5 ACBG1 Long-chain-fatty-acid CoA ligase ACSBG1
 APOE 1.38 P02650 APOE Apolipoprotein E precursor
 PLCB1 1.37 P10687 PLCB1 1-phosphatidylinositol-4;5-bisphosphate phosphodiesterase beta
 CA2 1.36 P27139 CAH2 Carbonic anhydrase 2
 THY1 1.35 P01830 THY1 Thy-1 membrane glycoprotein precursor
 HSP90AB1 1.33 P34058 HS90B Heat shock protein HSP 90-beta
 IDH3B 1.32 Q68FX0 IDH3B Isocitrate dehydrogenase [NAD] subunit beta; mitochondrial precursor
 PPIA 1.30 P10111 PPIA Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase A
 ENO3 1.30 P15429 ENOB Beta-enolase
 ATP5C1 1.29 P35435 ATPG ATP synthase subunit gamma; mitochondrial
 ATP6V1E1 1.29 Q6PCU2 VATE1 Vacuolar proton pump subunit E 1
 GOT1 1.29 P13221 AATC Aspartate aminotransferase; cytoplasmic
 NDUFV2 1.28 P19234 NDUV2 NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] flavoprotein 2; mitochondrial
 HSPA2 1.27 P14659 HSP72 Heat shock-related 70 kDa protein 2
 UCHL1 1.26 Q00981 UCHL1 Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase isozyme L1
 YWHAH 1.25 P68511 1433F 14-3-3 protein eta
 PRKCA 1.25 P05696 KPCA Protein kinase C alpha type
 TKT 1.24 P50137 TKT Transketolase
 HYOU1 1.24 Q63617 HYOU1 Hypoxia up-regulated protein 1 precursor
 CCT5 1.22 Q68FQ0 TCPE T-complex protein 1 subunit epsilon
 PRDX6 1.21 O35244 PRDX6 Peroxiredoxin-6
 SPTAN1 1.21 P16086 SPTA2 Spectrin alpha chain; brain
 CCDC92 1.17 P09606 GLNA Glutamine synthetase
 PEA15 1.12 Q5U318 PEA15 Astrocytic phosphoprotein PEA-15

Table 2.

Proteins Downregulated by Traumatic Brain Injury

IPA name Ratio Accession no. Uniprot name Protein name
Glycolysis
 HK1 0.88 P05708 HXK1 Hexokinase-1
 ALDOC 0.68 P09117 ALDOC Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase C
 TPI1 0.89 P48500 TPIS Triosephosphate isomerase
 PGAM1 0.82 P25113 PGAM1 Phosphoglycerate mutase 1
 ENO1 0.85 P04764 ENOA Alpha-enolase
 PKM2 0.93 P11980 KPYM Pyruvate kinase isozymes M1/M2
Krebs cycle
 LDHA 0.89 P04642 LDHA L-lactate dehydrogenase A chain
 PDHB 0.62 P49432 ODPB Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component subunit beta; mitochondrial
 ACO2 0.93 Q9ER34 ACON Aconitate hydratase; mitochondrial precursor
Oxidative phosphorylation/electron transport chain
 NDUFA10 0.76 Q561S0 NDUAA NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] 1 alpha subcomplex subunit 10
 NDUFA9 0.89 Q5BK63 NDUA9 NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] 1 alpha subcomplex subunit 9
 SDHA 0.88 Q920L2 DHSA Succinate dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] flavoprotein subunit; mitochondrial
 UQCRC2 0.84 P32551 QCR2 Cytochrome b-c1 complex subunit 2; mitochondrial precursor
ATP synthesis and transport
 SLC25A4 0.67 Q05962 ADT1 ADP/ATP translocase 1
 ATP5O 0.39 Q06647 ATPO ATP synthase subunit O; mitochondrial precursor
 ATP5F1 0.67 P19511 AT5F1 ATP synthase subunit b; mitochondrial precursor
 ATP5A1 0.85 P15999 ATPA ATP synthase subunit alpha; mitochondrial precursor
 ATP5B 0.89 P10719 ATPB ATP synthase subunit beta; mitochondrial precursor
 ATP1A1 0.66 P06685 AT1A1 Sodium/potassium-transporting ATPase subunit alpha-1 precursor
 ATP1A3 0.85 P06687 AT1A3 Sodium/potassium-transporting ATPase subunit alpha-3
Calcium signaling and homeostasis
 PPP3R1 0.58 P63100 CANB1 Calcineurin subunit B isoform 1
 CAMK2D 0.49 P15791 KCC2D Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II delta chain
 CALM1 0.56 P62161 CALM Calmodulin
 ATP2B2 0.73 P11506 AT2B2 Plasma membrane calcium-transporting ATPase 2
 ATP2B3 0.74 Q64568 AT2B3 Plasma membrane calcium-transporting ATPase 3
 SLC8A1 0.67 Q01728 NAC1 Sodium/calcium exchanger 1 precursor
Other
 ZNF22 0.21 Q9ERU2 ZNF22 Zinc finger protein 22
 MAPRE1 0.26 Q66HR2 MARE1 Microtubule-associated protein RP/EB family member 1
 DYNC2H1 0.27 Q9JJ79 DYHC2 Cytoplasmic dynein 2 heavy chain 1
 RAB1B 0.31 P10536 RAB1B Ras-related protein Rab-1B
 RPL23 0.34 P62832 RL23 60S ribosomal protein L23
 RALA 0.43 P63322 RALA Ras-related protein Ral-A precursor
 RPL22 0.48 P47198 RL22 60S ribosomal protein L22
 DPYSL4 0.48 Q62951 DPYL4 Dihydropyrimidinase-related protein 4
 SLC1A2 0.50 P31596 EAA2 Excitatory amino acid transporter 2
 SFXN5 0.51 Q8CFD0 SFXN5 Sideroflexin-5
 PLS3 0.52 Q63598 PLST Plastin-3
 CKMT1B 0.53 P25809 KCRU Creatine kinase; ubiquitous mitochondrial precursor
 SFXN1 0.55 Q63965 SFXN1 Sideroflexin-1
 DSTN 0.56 Q7M0E3 DEST Destrin
 PRDX2 0.57 P35704 PRDX2 Peroxiredoxin-2
 ANXA5 0.58 P14668 ANXA5 Annexin A5
 VDAC3 0.58 Q9R1Z0 VDAC3 Voltage-dependent anion-selective channel protein 3
 ALDH5A1 0.59 P51650 SSDH Succinate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase
 ASRGL1 0.59 Q8VI04 ASGL1 L-asparaginase
 HDHD2 0.62 Q6AYR6 HDHD2 Haloacid dehalogenase-like hydrolase domain-containing protein
 VAMP2 0.63 P63045 VAMP2 Vesicle-associated membrane protein 2
 TUBB3 0.65 Q4QRB4 TBB3 Tubulin beta-3 chain
 EEF1A2 0.66 P62632 EF1A2 Elongation factor 1-alpha 2
 ACAT1 0.67 P17764 THIL Acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase; mitochondrial precursor
 RHOB 0.67 P62747 RHOB Rho-related GTP-binding protein RhoB precursor
 PHB2 0.74 Q5XIH7 PHB2 Prohibitin-2
 SYN2 0.74 Q63537 SYN2 Synapsin-2
 AK1 0.75 P39069 KAD1 Adenylate kinase isoenzyme 1
 TUBB2C 0.77 Q6P9T8 TBB2C Tubulin beta-2C chain
 RAB3C 0.78 P62824 RAB3C Ras-related protein Rab-3C
 PFN1 0.78 P62963 PROF1 Profilin-1
 AP2A2 0.78 P18484 AP2A2 AP-2 complex subunit alpha-2
 S100A1 0.79 P35467 S10A1 Protein S100-A1
 HCG 2023776 0.80 P04256 ROA1 Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1
 YWHAZ 0.80 P63102 1433Z 14-3-3 protein zeta/delta
 EIF5A 0.81 Q3T1J1 IF5A1 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A-1
 GDA 0.81 Q9WTT6 GUAD Guanine deaminase
 TNR 0.81 Q05546 TNR Tenascin-R precursor
 HSPD1 0.84 P63039 CH60 60 kDa heat shock protein; mitochondrial precursor
 TUBA1B 0.85 Q6P9V9 TBA1B Tubulin alpha-1B chain
 RAB3A 0.86 P63012 RAB3A Ras-related protein Rab-3A
 GNB1 0.86 P54311 GBB1 Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G(S)/G(T) subunit beta
 YWHAE 0.87 P62260 1433E 14-3-3 protein epsilon
 GNAI1 0.89 P10824 GNAI1 Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(i); alpha-1 subunit
 TUBB2A 0.89 P85108 TBB2A Tubulin beta-2A chain
 YWHAB 0.89 P35213 1433B 14-3-3 protein beta/alpha
 CNP 0.90 P13233 CN37 2′;3′-cyclic-nucleotide 3′-phosphodiesterase
 ENO2 0.92 P07323 ENOG Gamma-enolase
 TUBA1A 0.94 P68370 TBA1A Tubulin alpha-1A chain
 STXBP1 0.95 P61765 STXB1 Syntaxin-binding protein 1

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Global metabolic dysfunction induced by traumatic brain injury (TBI). Differential stable isotope mass spectrometry led to the determination that many enzymes related to energy metabolism were coordinately downregulated by TBI compared to sham controls (Modified from Lehninger, 197041).

Bioinformatics studies

IPA was used to analyze the literature-based interconnectivity relationships among the 1002 identified and quantified proteins.

Associated network functions

The top associated network functions for all 1002 proteins were Cell Morphology, Cellular Assembly and Organization, and Genetic Disorder, with a score of 41, as well as those of Protein Synthesis, Cancer, and Gastrointestinal Disease, also with a score of 41, where score=–log(p) value (Table 3). For the subset of 124 upregulated proteins, the top associated network functions were Cellular Assembly, Organization, and Function; and Nervous System Development and Function; with a score of 41. For the 76 downregulated proteins, the top scoring networks were for Energy Production, Nucleic Acid Metabolism, and Small Molecule Biochemistry, with an extremely high score of 64.

Table 3.

Associated Network Functions

All 1002 identified and quantified proteins Scorea
Cell morphology, cellular assembly and organization, genetic disorder 41
Protein synthesis, cancer, gastrointestinal disease 41
Molecular transport, small molecule biochemistry, cellular assembly/organization 38
Cell signaling, cellular assembly and organization, cellular function/maintenance 38
Cellular assembly and organization, genetic disorder, metabolic disease 38
124 Upregulated proteins
Cellular assembly, organization, function; nervous system development 41
Cardiovascular disease, neurological disease, amino acid metabolism 40
Cellular assembly, organization, function; neurological disease 37
Nervous system development and function, cell death, cellular development 30
Nucleic acid metabolism, small molecule biochemistry, molecular transport 29
76 Downregulated proteins
Energy production, nucleic acid metabolism, small molecule biochemistry 64
Cell death, energy production, molecular transport 46
Carbohydrate metabolism, infectious disease, inflammatory disease 37
Cell death, cell signaling, molecular transport 21
a

Rank of networks according to their degree of relevance to the total network eligible molecules in the dataset of proteins taking into account the total number of molecules in the Ingenuity Knowledge Base that could potentially be included in networks.

Biological functions

Analysis of the molecular and cellular functions (Table 4, upper portion) showed that the highest probability upregulated proteins were all related to cells, particularly those related to cell structure and function. These were led by the functional groups of Cellular Assembly and Organization (50 proteins) and Cell Morphology (43 proteins). The highest-scoring individual network of Cellular Assembly (Fig. 2) was predominated by connectivity with actin, neurofilament heavy, medium, and light (NEFH, NEFM, and NEFL), and vimentin (VIM).

Table 4.

Top Biological Functions of Differentially-Regulated Proteins

Name p Valuea No. proteinsb
Molecular and cellular function Upregulated
Cellular assembly and organization 1.16E-13–7.95E-03 50
Cell morphology 6.58E-11–7.95E-03 43
Cellular function and maintenance 1.88E-08–7.95E-03 31
Cellular compromise 1.70E-07–7.95E-03 23
Cell-to-cell signaling and interaction 4.89E-07–7.95E-03 29
Downregulated
Carbohydrate metabolism 7.34E-08–3.90E-02 11
Energy production 2.83E-07–3.90E-02 13
Nucleic acid metabolism 2.83E-07–4.85E-02 19
Small molecule biochemistry 2.83E-07–4.96E-02 37
DNA replication, recombination, and repair 2.04E-06–3.68E-02 7
Physiological system development and function
Upregulated
Nervous system development and function 1.45E-13–7.95E-03 46
Behavior 2.84E-04–3.21E-04 8
Organismal survival 3.65E-04–1.98E-03 7
Cardiovascular system development and function 3.72E-04–7.95E-03 9
Tissue development 3.72E-04–7.95E-03 18
Downregulated
Nervous system development and function 2.20E-04–4.85E-02 15
Cardiovascular system development and function 5.01E-04–3.90E-02 6
Organ morphology 5.01E-04–3.42E-02 4
Hematological system development and function 4.96E-03–3.90E-02 4
Skeletal, muscular system development, function 4.96E-03–3.90E-02 8
a

Likelihood that the association between the proteins in our entire dataset and a related function is due to random association.

b

Number of proteins within each subcategory of functions.

The molecular and cellular functions (Table 4, upper portion) of the highest-probability downregulated proteins were centered on metabolic dysfunction, including Carbohydrate Metabolism (11 proteins), Energy Production (13 proteins), and Small Molecule Biochemistry (37 proteins). The individual network that illustrated these properties included proteins important for ATP synthesis and transport (Fig. 3, lower portion), which are largely connected through the 14-3-3 adaptor proteins (YWHAZ, YWHAE, and YWHAB) to structural proteins, predominantly tubulins (Fig. 3, upper portion).

Analysis of physiological system development and function (Table 4, lower portion) indicated that the highest probabilities were in Nervous System Development and Function for both upregulated proteins (46 proteins) and downregulated proteins (15 proteins).

Canonical pathways

The highest-ranked canonical pathways (Table 5) for upregulated proteins were signaling by protein kinase A and RhoA, in addition to endocytosis. All five top downregulated canonical pathways had very high p values, and were focused on metabolic control, including those for Glycolysis and Gluconeogenesis, Oxidative Phosphorylation, 14-3-3-Mediated Signaling, and Pyruvate Metabolism.

Table 5.

Canonical Pathways of Differentially-Regulated Proteins

Name p Valuea Ratiob
Upregulated
Protein kinase A signaling 1.35E-04 10/319 (0.031)
RhoA signaling 2.09E-04 6/110 (0.055)
Caveolar-mediated endocytosis 3.03E-04 5/85 (0.059)
Downregulated
Glycolysis/gluconeogenesis 4.70E-11 10/142 (0.07)
Oxidative phosphorylation 7.40E-07 8/165 (0.048)
14-3-3-Mediated signaling 1.17E-06 7/114 (0.061)
Pyruvate metabolism 4.70E-05 5/149 (0.034)
a

Measure of the likelihood that the association between the functional analysis proteins in this experiment and a given pathway is due to random chance.

b

Number of proteins that participate in a canonical pathway divided by the total number of proteins in the IPA Knowledge Base of Canonical Pathways.

Downregulation of calcineurin B1 (CANB1 or PPP3R1) in TBI

Using an unbiased, quantitative, differential stable isotope labeling approach, we found the ratio of the CANB1 in TBI animals compared to sham animals was 0.58, with a p value of<1E-14, corresponding to a 42% decrease (Table 2, UniProt Name CANB1, Accession no. P63100, calcineurin subunit B isoform 1; see Supplemental Table S3 for additional calcineurin nomenclature; see online supplementary material at http://www.liebertonline.com). CANB1 was identified by five peptides (Table 6 and Supplemental Table S1; see online supplementary material at http://www.liebertonline.com), that were entirely unique to CANB1, thus allowing unambiguous assignment to this subunit of the calcineurin subunits. Each of these five peptides, whose positions within the protein are indicated (Table 6), was identified multiple times with a total of 197 quantifications. PP2BA, the catalytic subunit that binds the CANB1 regulatory subunit to form a functional calcineurin enzyme, was slightly reduced by TBI to a ratio of 0.88 (12% decrease), but with a p value of 0.052, which was slightly below significance (Supplemental Table S2, UniProt Name PP2BA, Accession no. P63329).

Table 6.

Mass Spectrometry Identification of Calcineurin B1

Peptide sequence Position No. hits
LDLDNSGSLSVEEFMSLPELQQNPLVQR 29–57 130
VIDIFDTDGNGEVDFK 58–73 50
DGYISNGELFQVLK DTQLQQIVDK 104–117 11
DTQLQQIVDK 126–135 2
ISFEEFCAVVGGLDIHK 138–164 4

Western blot analysis confirmed a 55.2% downregulation of CANB1 in TBI (Fig. 4A). Since Western blots are more sensitive to small changes than mass spectrometry, we were able to determine that the CANB1 catalytic partner, PP2BA (Fig. 4B), was downregulated by 23.8%. Finally, the regulatory subunit CANB2 and its catalytic partner PP2BB were unaffected by TBI (Fig. 4C and D).

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

Expression of calcineurin family members in traumatic brain injury (TBI). Calcineurin expression was validated using GAPDH as an internal control in injured hippocampi by quantitative Western blot analysis. (A) CANB1. (B) PP2BA. (C) CANB2. (D) PP2BB. Gel images show five individual samples from sham (S1–S5) and five from TBI (T1–T5) animals. Graphs show the quantitative densitometry analyses of specific signals, with data expressed as mean±standard error of the mean; *p<0.05 and **p<0.01 significantly different from sham animals by Student's t test; n=5; see Supplemental Table S3 for additional calcineurin nomenclature; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase).

Numerous lines of evidence indicate that these effects are specific and unrelated to the administration of FK506 and cyclosporine (CsA) to the animals. First, the half-life of FK506 is far shorter than the 4 days that passed between administration and sacrifice.69 Second, CsA does not directly affect PP2BA levels in CA3.82 Our recent publication also supports the hypothesis that changes in calcineurin are independent of FK506 or CsA.70 Third, transplantation of neural stem cells into rats treated with these two agents rescued the TBI-induced decrease. Fourth, in an in vitro model of traumatic axonal injury that emulates many of the characteristics of TBI, similar injury-dependent decreases in calcineurin protein and catalytic activity were found in the absence of FK506 or CsA.70 Fifth, the decrease is subunit-specific, since only CANB1 and PP2BA, but not CANB2 and PP2BB, were affected by TBI. Taken together, these data suggest that TBI-dependent changes in calcineurins are specific and unrelated to the exposure of animals to FK506 or CsA.

To further understand the role of CANB1 downregulation in TBI, IPA of downregulated proteins was performed. CANB1 was a central node in a network of downregulated calcineurin and protein phosphatases identified by mass spectrometry (Fig. 5, top). This network was connected through downregulated calmodulin and calcium calmodulin-dependent protein kinase 2 delta (CAMKII) with the highly interconnected structural networks predominated by tubulins (Fig. 5, bottom).

Discussion

Using a rigorous quantitative systems biology approach to understand the complex pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury in the CA3 subregion of the rat hippocampus, we revealed extensively interrelated proteins and networks that reflect widespread downregulation of metabolism, and calcium signaling and homeostasis, with upregulation of proteins related to synaptic and neuronal structure and function. In contrast to previous global hippocampal proteomics studies, we focused on CA3 because of its central role in information flow through the hippocampus, where acquisition and consolidation of memories occur, and disruption of these processes underlies cognitive dysfunction in TBI. While many of the dysregulated proteins reported here have previously been identified in larger areas of the brain,33,38 focusing on a small region like CA3 allows more confidence that the observed dysregulated proteins are closely related in controlling information processing. Our results also revealed key features of the importance of independent validation studies, since several differences from previous reports33 could be accounted for by different models of TBI, ages, time post-injury, subregional analysis, and proteomics techniques. Nonetheless, unbiased large-scale proteomics studies require confirmation of our results with reductionist studies. We have shown here with calcineurin, and in another recent report,70 that several of the novel observations in the present proteomics study revealed by pathway analysis have indeed been confirmed by traditional reductionist strategies, thus exhibiting the validity and value of our approach. The agreement of these independent observations also attests to the credibility of stringent statistical rigor to generate high-confidence, unbiased mass spectrometry data.

Based on this comprehensive study, we propose the following sequelae outlined in Figure 6. The metabolic consequences of TBI we found in the CA3 are widespread and far-reaching, including glycolysis, the Krebs acid cycle, and oxidative phosphorylation. The reduction of several key regulatory glycolytic enzymes would severely compromise flux through this pathway, resulting in low levels of the end product, pyruvate. But with decreased pyruvate dehydrogenase (ODPB), combined with decreased lactate dehydrogenase-mediated (LDHA) production of pyruvate from lactate, the amount of pyruvate available for conversion to acetyl-CoA to enter the Krebs cycle would be very limited. Low aconitase (ACON) would further compromise Krebs cycle production of reducing equivalents in the form of NADH, and the important product from this cycle, succinate.

FIG. 6.

FIG. 6.

Calcineurin compensation model. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) induces alterations in many intracellular functions regulated by calcineurins. Downregulation of calcineurins, potentially through dysregulation of intracellular calcium, leads to mitochondrial dysfunction and metabolic disturbances. These actions are coupled with alterations in synaptic structure and function that disrupt normal neuronal activity.

Oxidative phosphorylation through the electron transport chain requires succinate to generate electrons to transport protons across the inner mitochondrial membrane. This process creates potential energy in the form of an electrochemical gradient, which allows protons to flow back across the membrane through ATP synthase, which converts ADP into ATP to produce energy. Any reduction in the NADH dehydrogenases (NDUAA and NDUA9), part of complex 1 or the entry enzymes into oxidative phosphorylation, would compromise the production of electrons to drive the electrochemical gradient, and ultimately ATP production. In addition to the low production of succinate from the Krebs cycle, low levels of succinate dehydrogenase (DHSA) would further compromise the function of complex II, which converts succinate to fumarate. Downregulation of cytochrome b-c1 (QCR2) causes a reduction of flux through complex III of the electron transport chain. Finally, on top of all these steps reducing the production of ATP even if it is produced, diminished ADP/ATP translocase 1 (ADT1) decreases the ability to export the lower levels of ATP that are produced from the mitochondria to the cytoplasm. To exacerbate the metabolic imbalance even further, reduced levels of creatine kinase (KCRU; Table 2) lower the levels of the important energy store phosphocreatine, which is particularly important for organs with high energy consumption, such as the brain. In addition to these metabolic pathways producing less energy, dysregulated flux through the electron transport chain causes a premature release of electrons, which then increases the production of oxygen free radicals and the generation of reactive oxygen species, and also decreases the mitochondrial membrane potential that regulates ion transport. The widespread coordinated dysregulation of these many proteins would have profound effects on mitochondrial function and overall cellular metabolism, producing the reactive oxygen species and oxidative stress that are well-established hallmarks of TBI pathophysiology.39

From the standpoint of synaptic structure and function, multiple mechanisms reflect dysregulated ATP metabolism and calcium responses. Decreased plasma membrane sodium/potassium-ATPase activity (AT1A1 and 3) would reduce the functional activity of the excitatory amino acid transporter (EAA2), the protein levels of which are also decreased (Table 2). This would lead to sustained glutamate-mediated excitotoxicity, since glutamate removal from the synaptic cleft would be diminished. The decreased mitochondrial membrane potential would reduce the ability of the uniporters to mobilize calcium from the cytoplasm to the mitochondria. In combination with decreased ability of the plasma membrane calcium transporting ATPases 2 and 3 (AT2B2 and 3), and the sodium/calcium exchanger (NAC1) to diminish intracellular calcium, all of these mechanisms contribute to sustained intracellular calcium, protracting the associated damage.

The calcineurins, also known as protein phosphatase 2B, are phosphatases with well-established roles in regulating synaptic structure and function.36 They respond to TBI through a wide variety of mechanisms, including mitochondrial dysfunction, actin-mediated synaptic reorganization, oxidative stress, and apoptosis.1,30,32,56,59,68,76 The calcineurin family is composed of several isoforms, with the active form composed of two subunits each, one regulatory and one catalytic. We found statistically significant downregulation of both the regulatory subunit CANB1 (CaNBα), and its catalytic partner PP2BA (CaNAα), 4 days after injury with no changes in CANB2 (CaNBβ) or PP2BB (CaNAβ). These results reciprocally confirmed our unbiased quantitative mass spectrometry approach. Suggestions from a controlled cortical impact (CCI) model imply that calcineurin subunit expression shows additional temporal changes.2,3 In particular, CCI results in a reduction of CANB1, similarly to our observations, in the CA3 region 2 h after injury, which returns to normal at 2 weeks post-injury. Further findings of regional and synaptic subfield-specific changes in the expression of calcineurin subunits also indicate the need for future mass spectrometry studies to identify specific fields and subcellular compartments within CA3.

Calcineurins dephosphorylate cytoskeletal and synaptic vesicle proteins to regulate synaptic structure and function both pre- and post-synaptically, and several of these processes are dysregulated in TBI. It is of particular note that CANB1 and PP2BA downregulation occurs with elevated calcium in response to injury, which on the surface appears paradoxical, since calcium prototypically leads to activation of calcineurins. Under normal circumstances transient elevations in calcium are important for the maintenance of synaptic transmission and structure. But excessive sustained calcium would drive these processes abnormally into a state of neuronal hyperexcitability.54

On one hand, the inhibition of calcineurins may be neuroprotective in TBI.44 The coordinate downregulation of CANB1, calmodulin (CALM), and CaMKII (KCC2D), may be a compensatory response to diminish further damage mediated by calcium (Fig. 6). Reduced calcineurin would reduce dephosphorylation of cofilin,56,72 resulting in net increased phosphorylation (inactivation), and shifting of the actin equilibrium from depolymerization toward actin filament polymerization, elongation, and spine synapse growth and reorganization.73 At the same time, since elevated calcineurins lead to mitochondrial dysfunction,1 downregulation would provide an additional compensatory mechanism to attempt to help protect mitochondria from further damage in light of the extensive dysregulation already occurring with respect to energy metabolism, ATP synthesis and transport, and the generation of oxygen free radicals and reactive oxygen species. Finally, downregulation of calcineurin would (1) maintain elevated phosphorylation and activation of myristoylated alanine-rich C-kinase substrate (MARCS), which we showed is elevated in TBI and is important for supporting neurotransmitter release;46 (2) increase NMDA receptor phosphorylation to moderate glutamate-mediated excitatory synaptic transmission;47 (3) increase AMPA receptor phosphorylation to reduce synaptic depression;64 and (4) diminish dispersal of GABA receptors from the synapse.17 This calcineurin compensatory model is consistent with the lack of progression of our TBI model to apoptotic neuronal death, in spite of the massive homeostatic disturbances. It is further supported by the role of cyclosporine A and FK506, which inhibit calcineurins to provide neuroprotection and improve outcomes after TBI.44,48

On the other hand, TBI-induced downregulation of calcineurins may be destructive. Previously we reported that fluid percussion TBI significantly decreased the expression of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) in rat hippocampi, whereas grafted human neural stem cells produced GDNF and rescued the cognitive deficit.18 This protective effect of GDNF was also reported by others.35 Interestingly, GDNF protected neurons and promoted neurite outgrowth by increasing calcineurins in cultured embryonic midbrain neurons,10 and increasing phosphorylation of cofilin,80 which are precisely opposite to the effects of TBI. In this regard it is striking that several of the dysregulated proteins identified here have been reported to comprise part of the GDNF-responsive proteome in rat striatal progenitor cells,28 and mouse striatal cells,29 but had opposite effects from those seen after TBI. Furthermore, our recent study showed that grafted neural stem cells and GDNF reduced axonal injury by normalizing the level of CANB1 in both an in vivo fluid percussion injury model, and an in vitro stretch injury model, respectively.70 It remains to be determined how grafted neural stem cells affect calcineurins and other proteins that are disturbed by TBI.

In summary, using an unbiased mass spectrometry and bioinformatics approach with confirmatory targeted reductionist analyses, we have shown that a coordinated, integrative dysregulation of proteins occurs in response to TBI. We thus propose a calcineurin compensatory model, mediated by CANB1 and PP2BA, that protects from the extensive downregulation of energy metabolism and upregulation of proteins responsible for synaptic structure, function, and reorganization, that normally occur during development, but are reinitiated in the response to injury.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental data
supp_data.zip (5.9MB, zip)

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Department of the Army (W81XWH-08-2-0137 to P.W.), via the U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity, Fort Detrick, Maryland. The content of this work does not necessarily reflect the position or the policy of the U.S. government, and no official endorsement should be inferred. Other support for this study came from the Miriam and Emmett McCoy Foundation (L.D.), the Coalition for Brain Injury Research (P.W.), the Moody Foundation (P.W.), the TIRR Foundation (P.W.), and the John S. Dunn Research Foundation (P.W.).

Author Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interests exist.

References

  • 1.Asai A. Qiu J. Narita Y. Chi S. Saito N. Shinoura N. Hamada H. Kuchino Y. Kirino T. High level calcineurin activity predisposes neuronal cells to apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274:34450–34458. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.48.34450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bales J.W. Ma X. Yan H.Q. Jenkins L.W. Dixon C.E. Expression of protein phosphatase 2B (calcineurin) subunit A isoforms in rat hippocampus after traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma. 2010a;27:109–120. doi: 10.1089/neu.2009.1072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bales J.W. Ma X. Yan H.Q. Jenkins L.W. Dixon C.E. Regional calcineurin subunit B isoform expression in rat hippocampus following a traumatic brain injury. Brain Res. 2010b;1358:211–220. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.08.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bedell E.A. DeWitt D.S. Uchida T. Prough D.S. Cerebral pressure autoregulation is intact and is not influenced by hypothermia after traumatic brain injury in rats. J. Neurotrauma. 2004;21:1212–1222. doi: 10.1089/neu.2004.21.1212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Benjamini Y. Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. Royal Statistical Soc. Series B (Methodological) 1995;57:289–300. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Blanchet S. Paradis-Giroux A.A. Pepin M. McKerral M. Impact of divided attention during verbal learning in young adults following mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2009;23:111–122. doi: 10.1080/02699050802649688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Burgess J.A. Lescuyer P. Hainard A. Burkhard P.R. Turck N. Michel P. Rossier J.S. Reymond F. Hochstrasser D.F. Sanchez J.C. Identification of brain cell death associated proteins in human post-mortem cerebrospinal fluid. J. Proteome Res. 2006;5:1674–1681. doi: 10.1021/pr060160v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chaichana K.L. Pradilla G. Huang J. Tamargo R.J. Role of inflammation (leukocyte-endothelial cell interactions) in vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage. World Neurosurg. 2010;73:22–41. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2009.05.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chew E. Zafonte R.D. Pharmacological management of neurobehavioral disorders following traumatic brain injury—a state-of-the-art review. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 2009;46:851–879. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2008.09.0120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Consales C. Volpicelli F. Greco D. Leone L. Colucci-D'Amato L. Perrone-Capano C. di Porzio U. GDNF signaling in embryonic midbrain neurons in vitro. Brain Res. 2007;1159:28–39. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.04.071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Conti A. Sanchez-Ruiz Y. Bachi A. Beretta L. Grandi E. Beltramo M. Alessio M. Proteome study of human cerebrospinal fluid following traumatic brain injury indicates fibrin(ogen) degradation products as trauma-associated markers. J. Neurotrauma. 2004;21:854–863. doi: 10.1089/0897715041526212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Corso P. Finkelstein E. Miller T. Fiebelkorn I. Zaloshnja E. Incidence and lifetime costs of injuries in the United States. Inj. Prev. 2006;12:212–218. doi: 10.1136/ip.2005.010983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dayon L. Hainard A. Licker V. Turck N. Kuhn K. Hochstrasser D.F. Burkhard P.R. Sanchez J.C. Relative quantification of proteins in human cerebrospinal fluids by MS/MS using 6-plex isobaric tags. Anal. Chem. 2008;80:2921–2931. doi: 10.1021/ac702422x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.De Beaumont L. Theoret H. Mongeon D. Messier J. Leclerc S. Tremblay S. Ellemberg D. Lassonde M. Brain function decline in healthy retired athletes who sustained their last sports concussion in early adulthood. Brain. 2009;132:695–708. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.De Monte V.E. Geffen G.M. Massavelli B.M. The effects of post-traumatic amnesia on information processing following mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2006;20:1345–1354. doi: 10.1080/02699050601082073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.DeWitt D.S. Smith T.G. Deyo D.J. Miller K.R. Uchida T. Prough D.S. L-arginine and superoxide dismutase prevent or reverse cerebral hypoperfusion after fluid-percussion traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma. 1997;14:223–233. doi: 10.1089/neu.1997.14.223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fukura H. Komiya Y. Igarashi M. Signaling pathway downstream of GABAA receptor in the growth cone. J. Neurochem. 1996;67:1426–1434. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1996.67041426.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gao J. Prough D.S. McAdoo D.J. Grady J.J. Parsley M.O. Ma L. Tarensenko Y.I. Wu P. Transplantation of primed human fetal neural stem cells improves cognitive function in rats after traumatic brain injury. Exp. Neurol. 2006;201:281–292. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2006.04.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gao W.M. Chadha M.S. Berger R.P. Omenn G.S. Allen D.L. Pisano M. Adelson P.D. Clark R.S. Jenkins L.W. Kochanek P.M. A gel-based proteomic comparison of human cerebrospinal fluid between inflicted and non-inflicted pediatric traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma. 2007;24:43–53. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.0061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Goshe M.B. Smith R.D. Stable isotope-coded proteomic mass spectrometry. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2003;14:101–109. doi: 10.1016/s0958-1669(02)00014-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gygi S.P. Rist B. Gerber S.A. Turecek F. Gelb M.H. Aebersold R. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat. Biotechnol. 1999;17:994–999. doi: 10.1038/13690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hall E.D. Vaishnav R.A. Mustafa A.G. Antioxidant therapies for traumatic brain injury. Neurotherapeutics. 2010;7:51–61. doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2009.10.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hanrieder J. Wetterhall M. Enblad P. Hillered L. Bergquist J. Temporally resolved differential proteomic analysis of human ventricular CSF for monitoring traumatic brain injury biomarker candidates. J. Neurosci. Methods. 2009;177:469–478. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.10.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Haqqani A.S. Hutchison J.S. Ward R. Stanimirovic D.B. Biomarkers and diagnosis; protein biomarkers in serum of pediatric patients with severe traumatic brain injury identified by ICAT-LC-MS/MS. J. Neurotrauma. 2007;24:54–74. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.0079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hardingham G.E. Coupling of the NMDA receptor to neuroprotective and neurodestructive events. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2009;37:1147–1160. doi: 10.1042/BST0371147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Haskins W.E. Kobeissy F.H. Wolper R.A. Ottens A.K. Kitlen J.W. McClung S.H. O'Steen B.E. Chow M.M. Pineda J.A. Denslow N.D. Hayes R.L. Wang K.K. Rapid discovery of putative protein biomarkers of traumatic brain injury by SDS-PAGE-capillary liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J. Neurotrauma. 2005;22:629–644. doi: 10.1089/neu.2005.22.629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Heller M. Mattou H. Menzel C. Yao X. Trypsin catalyzed 16O-to-18O exchange for comparative proteomics: tandem mass spectrometry comparison using MALDI-TOF, ESI-QTOF, and ESI-ion trap mass spectrometers. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2003;14:704–718. doi: 10.1016/S1044-0305(03)00207-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hoffrogge R. Beyer S. Hubner R. Mikkat S. Mix E. Scharf C. Schmitz U. Pauleweit S. Berth M. Zubrzycki I.Z. Christoph H. Pahnke J. Wolkenhauer O. Uhrmacher A. Volker U. Rolfs A. 2-DE profiling of GDNF overexpression-related proteome changes in differentiating ST14A rat progenitor cells. Proteomics. 2007;7:33–46. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200600614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hong Z. Liu J. Xia L. Pan J. Xiao Q. Lu G. Liang L. Chen S.D. Identification of glial-cell-line-derived neurotrophic factor-regulated proteins of striatum in mouse model of Parkinson disease. Proteomics Clin. Appl. 2009;3:1072–1083. doi: 10.1002/prca.200800234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hovda D.A. Becker D.P. Katayama Y. Secondary injury and acidosis. J. Neurotrauma. 1992;9(Suppl. 1):S47–S60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hovda D.A. Yoshino A. Kawamata T. Katayama Y. Becker D.P. Diffuse prolonged depression of cerebral oxidative metabolism following concussive brain injury in the rat: a cytochrome oxidase histochemistry study. Brain Res. 1991;567:1–10. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(91)91429-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Huang R.Q. Dillon G.H. Maintenance of recombinant type A gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor function: role of protein tyrosine phosphorylation and calcineurin. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1998;286:243–255. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jenkins L.W. Peters G.W. Dixon C.E. Zhang X. Clark R.S. Skinner J.C. Marion D.W. Adelson P.D. Kochanek P.M. Conventional and functional proteomics using large format two-dimensional gel electrophoresis 24 hours after controlled cortical impact in postnatal day 17 rats. J. Neurotrauma. 2002;19:715–740. doi: 10.1089/08977150260139101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Jiang X.B. Ohno K. Qian L. Tominaga B. Kuroiwa T. Nariai T. Hirakawa K. Changes in local cerebral blood flow, glucose utilization, and mitochondrial function following traumatic brain injury in rats. Neurol. Med. Chir. (Tokyo) 2000;40:16–28. doi: 10.2176/nmc.40.16. ; discussion 28–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kim B.T. Rao V.L. Sailor K.A. Bowen K.K. Dempsey R.J. Protective effects of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor on hippocampal neurons after traumatic brain injury in rats. J. Neurosurg. 2001;95:674–679. doi: 10.3171/jns.2001.95.4.0674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Klee C.B. Crouch T.H. Krinks M.H. Calcineurin: a calcium- and calmodulin-binding protein of the nervous system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1979;76:6270–6273. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.12.6270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kobeissy F.H. Ottens A.K. Zhang Z. Liu M.C. Denslow N.D. Dave J.R. Tortella F.C. Hayes R.L. Wang K.K. Novel differential neuroproteomics analysis of traumatic brain injury in rats. Mol. Cell Proteomics. 2006;5:1887–1898. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M600157-MCP200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kochanek A.R. Kline A.E. Gao W.M. Chadha M. Lai Y. Clark R.S. Dixon C.E. Jenkins L.W. Gel-based hippocampal proteomic analysis 2 weeks following traumatic brain injury to immature rats using controlled cortical impact. Dev. Neurosci. 2006;28:410–419. doi: 10.1159/000094167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kochanek P.M. Ischemic and traumatic brain injury: pathobiology and cellular mechanisms. Crit. Care Med. 1993;21:S333–S335. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199309001-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Laird M.D. Vender J.R. Dhandapani K.M. Opposing roles for reactive astrocytes following traumatic brain injury. Neurosignals. 2008;16:154–164. doi: 10.1159/000111560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lehninger A.L. Biochemistry: The Molecular Basis of Cell Structure and Function. Worth Publishers; New York: 1970. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lowenstein D.H. Thomas M.J. Smith D.H. McIntosh T.K. Selective vulnerability of dentate hilar neurons following traumatic brain injury: a potential mechanistic link between head trauma and disorders of the hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 1992;12:4846–4853. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-12-04846.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lu D. Goussev A. Chen J. Pannu P. Li Y. Mahmood A. Chopp M. Atorvastatin reduces neurological deficit and increases synaptogenesis, angiogenesis, and neuronal survival in rats subjected to traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma. 2004;21:21–32. doi: 10.1089/089771504772695913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Marmarou C.R. Povlishock J.T. Administration of the immunophilin ligand FK506 differentially attenuates neurofilament compaction and impaired axonal transport in injured axons following diffuse traumatic brain injury. Exp. Neurol. 2006;197:353–362. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2005.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Matser E.J. Kessels A.G. Lezak M.D. Jordan B.D. Troost J. Neuropsychological impairment in amateur soccer players. JAMA. 1999;282:971–973. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.10.971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.McNamara R.K. Hussain R.J. Simon E.J. Stumpo D.J. Blackshear P.J. Abel T. Lenox R.H. Effect of myristoylated alanine-rich C kinase substrate (MARCKS) overexpression on hippocampus-dependent learning and hippocampal synaptic plasticity in MARCKS transgenic mice. Hippocampus. 2005;15:675–683. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ohmitsu M. Fukunaga K. Yamamoto H. Miyamoto E. Phosphorylation of myristoylated alanine-rich protein kinase C substrate by mitogen-activated protein kinase in cultured rat hippocampal neurons following stimulation of glutamate receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274:408–417. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.1.408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Okonkwo D.O. Melon D.E. Pellicane A.J. Mutlu L.K. Rubin D.G. Stone J.R. Helm G.A. Dose-response of cyclosporin A in attenuating traumatic axonal injury in rat. Neuroreport. 2003;14:463–466. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200303030-00033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ong S.E. Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics turns quantitative. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2005;1:252–262. doi: 10.1038/nchembio736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ong S.E. Blagoev B. Kratchmarova I. Kristensen D.B. Steen H. Pandey A. Mann M. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol. Cell Proteomics. 2002;1:376–386. doi: 10.1074/mcp.m200025-mcp200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ong S.E. Foster L.J. Mann M. Mass spectrometric-based approaches in quantitative proteomics. Methods. 2003;29:124–130. doi: 10.1016/s1046-2023(02)00303-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Oshima T. Lee S. Sato A. Oda S. Hirasawa H. Yamashita T. TNF-alpha contributes to axonal sprouting and functional recovery following traumatic brain injury. Brain Res. 2009;1290:102–110. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.07.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ottens A.K. Kobeissy F.H. Fuller B.F. Liu M.C. Oli M.W. Hayes R.L. Wang K.K. Novel neuroproteomic approaches to studying traumatic brain injury. Prog. Brain Res. 2007;161:401–418. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)61029-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Palop J.J. Mucke L. Roberson E.D. Quantifying biomarkers of cognitive dysfunction and neuronal network hyperexcitability in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease: depletion of calcium-dependent proteins and inhibitory hippocampal remodeling. Methods Mol. Biol. 2011;670:245–262. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-744-0_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Robel S. Berninger B. Gotz M. The stem cell potential of glia: lessons from reactive gliosis. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2011;12:88–104. doi: 10.1038/nrn2978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Rusnak F. Mertz P. Calcineurin: form and function. Physiol. Rev. 2000;80:1483–1521. doi: 10.1152/physrev.2000.80.4.1483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Sadygov R.G. Zhao Y. Haidacher S.J. Starkey J.M. Tilton R.G. Denner L. Using power spectrum analysis to evaluate (18)O-water labeling data acquired from low resolution mass spectrometers. J. Proteome Res. 2010;9:4306–4312. doi: 10.1021/pr100642q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Scheff S.W. Price D.A. Hicks R.R. Baldwin S.A. Robinson S. Brackney C. Synaptogenesis in the hippocampal CA1 field following traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma. 2005;22:719–732. doi: 10.1089/neu.2005.22.719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Shapira Y. Yadid G. Cotev S. Shohami E. Accumulation of calcium in the brain following head trauma. Neurol. Res. 1989;11:169–172. doi: 10.1080/01616412.1989.11739885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Soares H.D. Hicks R.R. Smith D. McIntosh T.K. Inflammatory leukocytic recruitment and diffuse neuronal degeneration are separate pathological processes resulting from traumatic brain injury. J. Neurosci. 1995;15:8223–8233. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-12-08223.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Sosin D.M. Sniezek J.E. Waxweiler R.J. Trends in death associated with traumatic brain injury, 1979 through 1992. Success and failure. JAMA. 1995;273:1778–1780. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Starkey J.M. Zhao Y. Sadygov R.G. Haidacher S.J. Lejeune W.S. Dey N. Luxon B.A. Kane M.A. Napoli J.L. Denner L. Tilton R.G. Altered retinoic acid metabolism in diabetic mouse kidney identified by O isotopic labeling and 2D mass spectrometry. PLoS One. 2010;5:e11095. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Stoica B.A. Faden A.I. Cell death mechanisms and modulation in traumatic brain injury. Neurotherapeutics. 2010;7:3–12. doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2009.10.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Tan S.E. Wenthold R.J. Soderling T.R. Phosphorylation of AMPA-type glutamate receptors by calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II and protein kinase C in cultured hippocampal neurons. J. Neurosci. 1994;14:1123–1129. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-03-01123.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Tao W.A. Aebersold R. Advances in quantitative proteomics via stable isotope tagging and mass spectrometry. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2003;14:110–118. doi: 10.1016/s0958-1669(02)00018-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Tarasenko Y.I. Yu Y. Jordan P.M. Bottenstein J. Wu P. Effect of growth factors on proliferation and phenotypic differentiation of human fetal neural stem cells. J. Neurosci. Res. 2004;78:625–636. doi: 10.1002/jnr.20316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Tilton R.G. Haidacher S.J. Lejeune W.S. Zhang X. Zhao Y. Kurosky A. Brasier A.R. Denner L. Diabetes-induced changes in the renal cortical proteome assessed with two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. Proteomics. 2007;7:1729–1742. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200700017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Tong G. Shepherd D. Jahr C.E. Synaptic desensitization of NMDA receptors by calcineurin. Science. 1995;267:1510–1512. doi: 10.1126/science.7878472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Venkataramanan R. Warty V.S. Zemaitis M.A. Sanghvi A.T. Burckart G.J. Seltman H. Todo S. Makowka L. Starzl T.E. Biopharmaceutical aspects of FK-506. Transplant. Proc. 1987;19:30–35. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Wang E. Gao J. Yang Q. Parsley M. Dunn T. Zhang L. Dewitt D. Denner L. Prough D.S. Wu P. Molecular mechanisms underlying effects of neural stem cells against traumatic axonal injury. J. Neurotrauma. 2011;29:295–312. doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.2043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Wang K.K. Ottens A. Haskins W. Liu M.C. Kobeissy F. Denslow N. Chen S. Hayes R.L. Proteomics studies of traumatic brain injury. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 2004;61:215–240. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7742(04)61009-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Wang Y. Shibasaki F. Mizuno K. Calcium signal-induced cofilin dephosphorylation is mediated by Slingshot via calcineurin. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:12683–12689. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M411494200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Whiteman I.T. Gervasio O.L. Cullen K.M. Guillemin G.J. Jeong E.V. Witting P.K. Antao S.T. Minamide L.S. Bamburg J.R. Goldsbury C. Activated actin-depolymerizing factor/cofilin sequesters phosphorylated microtubule-associated protein during the assembly of alzheimer-like neuritic cytoskeletal striations. J. Neurosci. 2009;29:12994–13005. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3531-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Xiong Y. Mahmood A. Chopp M. Angiogenesis, neurogenesis and brain recovery of function following injury. Curr. Opin. Investig. Drugs. 2010a;11:298–308. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Xiong Y. Mahmood A. Chopp M. Neurorestorative treatments for traumatic brain injury. Discov. Med. 2010b;10:434–442. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Yang S.A. Klee C.B. Low affinity Ca2+binding sites of calcineurin B mediate conformational changes in calcineurin A. Biochemistry (Mosc.) 2000;39:16147–16154. doi: 10.1021/bi001321q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Yang X. Yang S. Wang J. Zhang X. Wang C. Hong G. Expressive proteomics profile changes of injured human brain cortex due to acute brain trauma. Brain Inj. 2009;23:830–840. doi: 10.1080/02699050903196670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Yao X. Freas A. Ramirez J. Demirev P.A. Fenselau C. Proteolytic 18O labeling for comparative proteomics: model studies with two serotypes of adenovirus. Anal. Chem. 2001;73:2836–2842. doi: 10.1021/ac001404c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Yi J.H. Hazell A.S. Excitotoxic mechanisms and the role of astrocytic glutamate transporters in traumatic brain injury. Neurochem. Int. 2006;48:394–403. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2005.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Yoong L.F. Wan G. Too H.P. GDNF-induced cell signaling and neurite outgrowths are differentially mediated by GFRalpha1 isoforms. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2009;41:464–473. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2009.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Zhao Y. Denner L. Haidacher S.J. LeJeune W.S. Tilton R.G. Comprehensive analysis of the mouse renal cortex using two-dimensional HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry. Proteome Sci. 2008;6:15. doi: 10.1186/1477-5956-6-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Zhu W.L. Shi H.S. Wang S.J. Wu P. Ding Z.B. Lu L. Hippocampal CA3 calcineurin activity participates in depressive-like behavior in rats. J. Neurochem. 2011;117:1075–1086. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07285.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Zuberovic A. Wetterhall M. Hanrieder J. Bergquist J. CE MALDI-TOF/TOF MS for multiplexed quantification of proteins in human ventricular cerebrospinal fluid. Electrophoresis. 2009;30:1836–1843. doi: 10.1002/elps.200800714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental data
supp_data.zip (5.9MB, zip)

Articles from Journal of Neurotrauma are provided here courtesy of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

RESOURCES