Abstract
Background
A double-blind retrospective study was carried out at our oral and maxillofacial surgery department to assess speech and esthetics of primary cheiloplasty in patients operated for unilateral complete cleft lip, alveolus and palate.
Materials and Methods
Total sample size was 60. All were operated for unilateral complete cleft lip, alveolus and palate. Age range was between 1 and 21 years. Results of surgeries performed by two surgeons were assessed. The speech of all these patients was judged by a single speech therapist who was unaware of the operating surgeon. All patients were assessed for articulatory errors, namely, omission, distortion, substitution, addition and intelligibility. Sixty-eight words in local language (Kannada) were selected by the speech pathologist. All patients were subdivided into three age groups: ≤5 years, 6-10 years and ≥11 years. The cheiloplasty was assessed using VLS (V: vermilion, L: lip, S: scar) scale for vermilion, lip and scar patterns.
Results and Conclusion
Patients undergoing palatoplasty in ≤1 year showed good articulation between the age of 5 and 10 years. Articulation and intelligibility was maximum in patients ≥11 years. Patients at this age try various compensatory mechanisms to overcome communication disabilities. Based on the VLS scale, scarring was the least in all patients. Vermilion and lip patterns showed satisfactory results in most of the patients.
Key Words: Esthetics, lip, scar, speech, vermilion
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (117.7 KB).
References
- 1.Van Lierde KM, Luyten A, Van Borsel J. Speech intelligibility of children with unilateral cleft lip and palate (Dutch cleft) following a one-stage Wardill-Kilner palatoplasty, as judged by their parents. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;39:641–646. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.02.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Assuncao AGA. The VLS classification for secondary deformities in the unilateral cleft lip. Br J Plast Surg. 1992;45:288–292. doi: 10.1016/0007-1226(92)90054-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fonseca RJ. Textbook of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Cleft, Craniofacial, Cosmetic Surgery. WB Saunders; Philadelphia: 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; New York: 1990. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Markus AF, Delaire J, Smith WP. Facial balance in cleft lip and palate. II. Cleft lip and palate and secondary deformities. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992;30:296–298. doi: 10.1016/0266-4356(92)90179-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Robinson DW, Ketchum LD, Masters FW. Double V-Y procedure for whistling deformity in repaired cleft lips. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1970;46:241–244. doi: 10.1097/00006534-197009000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Braithwaite F, David G, Maurice MB. The importance of the levator palati muscle in cleft palate closure. Br J Plast Surg. 1968;21:60–62. doi: 10.1016/s0007-1226(68)80087-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kriens OB. Fundamental anatomic findings for an intravelar veloplasty. Cleft Palate J. 1970;7:27–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Schneiderman CR, Harding JB. Social ratings of children with cleft lip by school peers. Cleft Palate J. 1984;21:219–223. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]