Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1996 Apr 30;93(9):3732–3739. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.9.3732

Intermediate- and long-term earthquake prediction.

L R Sykes 1
PMCID: PMC39430  PMID: 11607658

Abstract

Progress in long- and intermediate-term earthquake prediction is reviewed emphasizing results from California. Earthquake prediction as a scientific discipline is still in its infancy. Probabilistic estimates that segments of several faults in California will be the sites of large shocks in the next 30 years are now generally accepted and widely used. Several examples are presented of changes in rates of moderate-size earthquakes and seismic moment release on time scales of a few to 30 years that occurred prior to large shocks. A distinction is made between large earthquakes that rupture the entire downdip width of the outer brittle part of the earth's crust and small shocks that do not. Large events occur quasi-periodically in time along a fault segment and happen much more often than predicted from the rates of small shocks along that segment. I am moderately optimistic about improving predictions of large events for time scales of a few to 30 years although little work of that type is currently underway in the United States. Precursory effects, like the changes in stress they reflect, should be examined from a tensorial rather than a scalar perspective. A broad pattern of increased numbers of moderate-size shocks in southern California since 1986 resembles the pattern in the 25 years before the great 1906 earthquake. Since it may be a long-term precursor to a great event on the southern San Andreas fault, that area deserves detailed intensified study.

Full text

PDF
3732

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Jaumé S. C., Sykes L. R. Changes in state of stress on the southern san andreas fault resulting from the california earthquake sequence of april to june 1992. Science. 1992 Nov 20;258(5086):1325–1328. doi: 10.1126/science.258.5086.1325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Reasenberg P. A., Simpson R. W. Response of regional seismicity to the static stress change produced by the loma prieta earthquake. Science. 1992 Mar 27;255(5052):1687–1690. doi: 10.1126/science.255.5052.1687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Rosendahl J, Vekic M, Rutledge JE. Predictability of large avalanches on a sandpile. Phys Rev Lett. 1994 Jul 25;73(4):537–540. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Segall P., Lisowski M. Surface displacements in the 1906 san francisco and 1989 loma prieta earthquakes. Science. 1990 Nov 30;250(4985):1241–1244. doi: 10.1126/science.250.4985.1241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES