Abstract
Tropical fevers were defined as infections that are prevalent in, or are unique to tropical and subtropical regions. Some of these occur throughout the year and some especially in rainy and post-rainy season. Concerned about high prevalence and morbidity and mortality caused by these infections, and overlapping clinical presentations, difficulties in arriving at specific diagnoses and need for early empiric treatment, Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine (ISCCM) constituted an expert committee to develop a consensus statement and guidelines for management of these diseases in the emergency and critical care. The committee decided to focus on most common infections on the basis of available epidemiologic data from India and overall experience of the group. These included dengue hemorrhagic fever, rickettsial infections/scrub typhus, malaria (usually falciparum), typhoid, and leptospira bacterial sepsis and common viral infections like influenza. The committee recommends a ‘syndromic approach’ to diagnosis and treatment of critical tropical infections and has identified five major clinical syndromes: undifferentiated fever, fever with rash / thrombocytopenia, fever with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), fever with encephalopathy and fever with multi organ dysfunction syndrome. Evidence based algorithms are presented to guide critical care specialists to choose reliable rapid diagnostic modalities and early empiric therapy based on clinical syndromes.
Keywords: Tropical fever, Dengue, Malaria, Typhoid, Leptospirosis, Scrub typhus, Sepsis, Influenza, Guidelines
Introduction
Every year different parts of India are hit by seasonal fevers in the post monsoon period. These fevers include Dengue, Malaria, Scrub Typhus, Leptospirosis, Typhoid fever and some other fevers leading to very high morbidity and mortality. A large number of these patients require intensive care unit (ICU) care like mechanical ventilation, renal replacements therapy, vasopressor support, blood and blood component therapy due to single or multiorgan failure. The clinical picture of these diseases is so overlapping that it is almost impossible to achieve differential diagnosis of these diseases in emergency and ICU settings when the time available for intervention is limited. Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine (ISCCM) was seized of the matter for several years. Given this background, ISCCM decided to develop a consensus statement and guidelines for management of these diseases in ICU.
Methods
An expert committee consisting of scientists, teachers and researchers from India was constituted to discuss this topic, track the literature, share the experience and brainstorm to develop guidelines. The committee included experts from Critical care, Emergency Medicine, Infectious diseases, Internal Medicine, Pediatrics, Microbiology [Appendix 1].
The group of experts after exchanging notes on E-mails established a literature bank, which was shared by all the members. Each one shared his inputs on E-mail with all. Thus, a thorough review of literature was done using available resources including PubMed. The scope of review covered both, adults and children, presenting in ICU. This resulted in background resource. Then each expert was allotted a specific topic for discussion from the reviewed literature and preparing a PowerPoint presentation on the same. All experts got together for 2 days for a face to face meeting and had extensive brainstorming, discussion based on literature and PowerPoint presentations prepared by each expert. Inferences were drawn based on the available evidence and expert opinion. Then each expert was further requested to compile recommendations on the topic allotted to him based on the discussions. The recommendations were again shared and discussed on e-meetings. Finally after full 1 year's search, work, brainstorming and coordination, a consensus statement has been arrived which is strongly evidence based.
The levels of evidence used in this guideline are given in Table 1. It is to be noted that the hierarchy of evidence relate to the strength of literature and not to clinical importance.
Table 1.
Tropical diseases were defined as diseases that are prevalent in, or unique to tropical and subtropical regions. The diseases are less prevalent in temperate climates, due in part to the occurrence of a cold season, which controls the insect population by forcing hibernation.[1] Most often disease is transmitted by an insect “bite”, which causes transmission of the infectious agent. The Indian subcontinent by its very location represents one of the largest tropical and subtropical regions with many of these infections being prevalent. Some of these occur throughout the year and some are greatly influenced by the seasons (especially rainy season) and geography.[2] On the basis of limited epidemiologic data from the north (Rohtak) and South (Vellore) and overall experience of the group, it was decided to focus on seven most common infections, with reference to other infections wherever appropriate.[3,4,5] These are dengue, rickettsial infections especially scrub typhus, malaria (usually due to Plasmodium falciparum), typhoid and leptospirosis; bacterial sepsis and common viral infections like influenza. It was recognized that occasionally the patients may have concomitant infections and can present with atypical manifestations.[6,7,8]
The group accepted that management of sick patients with tropical infections must begin as soon as the patient reports to the emergency department/ICU in a hospital. These infections must be suspected in all febrile patients as delay in the institution of specific therapy may lead to increased morbidity and mortality. Since the symptoms of many infections may overlap with one another and with severe bacterial sepsis, it may be very difficult to identify these infections at the time of presentation. Yet, most of the time, empiric therapy needs to be initiated at the outset. There can be no uniform guideline for empiric therapy but trends of tropical infections should guide the treating physician. In a sick patient, the idea is to hit wide and hit early with the intention to deescalate once the definitive diagnosis is established.[9]
Results and Recommendations
The group agreed that a “syndromic approach” to tropical infections can guide the intensivists regarding the commonest etiologies, investigative modalities and help them to choose early empiric therapy. For ease of diagnosis these infections were divided into five major syndromes: undifferentiated fever, fever with rash/thrombocytopenia, fever with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), fever with encephalopathy and fever with multi organ dysfunction syndrome.[10] Common infections that are likely to cause these syndromes are as follows [Table 2]:
Table 2.
Undifferentiated fever
Malaria (P. falciparum), scrub typhus, leptospirosis, typhoid, dengue and other common viral illness.
Fever with rash/thrombocytopenia
Dengue, rickettsial infections, meningococcal infection, malaria (usually falciparum), leptospirosis, measles, rubella and other viral exantem.
Fever with ARDS
Scrub typhus, falciparum malaria, influenza including H1N1, leptospirosis, hantavirus infection, meliodosis, severe community acquired pneumonias due to Legionella spp. and Streptococcus pneumoniae and diffuse alveolar hemorrhage due to collagen vascular diseases.
Febrile encephalopathy
Encephalitis (Herpes simplex virus encephalitis, Japanese B and other viral encephalitis), meningitis (S. pneumoniae, Neisseria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenzae, enteroviruses), scrub typhus, cerebral malaria and typhoid encephalopathy.
Fever with multiorgan dysfunction
Bacterial sepsis, falciparum malaria, leptospirosis, scrub typhus, dengue, hepatitis A or E with fulminant hepatic failure and hepato-renal syndrome, Hanta virus infection, hemophagocytosis and macrophage activation syndrome.
An algorithmic approach for the diagnosis and management of critical tropical infections is given in Flow Chart 1 and 2.
Following are the syndrome-based management principles for critical tropical infections.
Specific infections
Salient features of common tropical infections are given below.
Scrub typhus
Causative organism: Orientia tsutsugamushi
Vector: chiggers (larva of Trombiculid mite).
Outbreaks are reported from all over India starting from the sub-Himalayan belt to more eastern and southern Indian regions.[11,12,13]
Pathophysiology: The organism infects vascular endothelium with subsequent vascular injury in organs like the skin, liver, kidneys, meninges and brain resulting in multi organ manifestations.
Clinical Features: Incubation period: 1-3 weeks:
Fever, headache and myalgia, breathing difficulty, delirium, vomiting, cough, jaundice
Eschar.
Complications: Overwhelming pneumonia with ARDS – like presentation, hepatitis, aseptic meningitis, myocarditis and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC).
Lab Diagnosis (Serology):[14]
Weil-Felix: poor sensitivity and specificity
Indirect fluorescent antibody: “Gold standard” (Level IIA)
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM antibodies: sensitivity and specificity > 90%.
First line: Doxycycline 100 mg BD for 7 days (Level IA)
Azithromycin or Rifampicin or chloramphenicol as alternatives in children and pregnant women.(Level IIB).
Leptospirosis
Causative organism: Leptospira interrogans
Source of infection: Direct contact of skin or mucosa with water contaminated with urine or body fluid of an infected animal.
Peak incidence during the rainy season. Rampant in southern, western and eastern India. Increasing incidence in “non-endemic” northern India.[17,18]
Pathophysiology: Leptospires multiply in the small blood vessel endothelium, resulting in damage and vasculitis and clinical manifestations.
Clinical features: Incubation period: usually 5-14 days but can be 72 h to a month or more.
Biphasic clinical presentation:
-
Anicteric leptospirosis
Abrupt onset of fever, chills, headache, myalgia, abdominal pain, conjunctival suffusion, transient skin rash.
Icteric leptospirosis (Weil's disease) occurs in 5-15% – Jaundice, proteinuria, hematuria, oliguria and/or anuria, pulmonary hemorrhages, ARDS, myocarditis.
Raised creatine phosphokinase levels, Culture (blood, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), urine)
Positive serology
Microscopic agglutination test (Sensitivity 30-63%, specificity > 97%)
IgM ELISA (Sensitivity 52-89%, specificity > 94%).
First line: Penicillin G 1.5 MU 6 hourly for 7 days (Level IA)
Alternative: Third generation cephalosporins. Oral Doxycycline in uncomplicated infections.
Plasma exchange, corticosteroids and intravenous (i.v.) Ig in selected patients (Level III) in whom conventional therapy does not elicit a response.
Dengue
Causative organism: Dengue virus (Flavivirus) serotypes 1-4.
Vector: Aedes mosquitoes:
Dengue is endemic throughout India with a recent resurgence of epidemics over the past two decades.[23]
Pathogenesis:
Cross-reactive (but non-neutralizing) anti-dengue antibodies from previous infection enhance newly infecting strain with viral uptake of monocytes and macrophages
Amplified cascade of cytokines and complement activation
Endothelial dysfunction, platelet destruction and consumption of coagulation factors, Plasma leakage and hemorrhagic manifestations.
Clinical features: Incubation period 4-10 days:[24]
Dengue fever
Headache, retro-orbital pain, myalgia, arthralgia, rash
Dengue Hemorrhagic fever
Thrombocytopenia (<100,000), skin, mucosal and gastrointestinal bleeds, third spacing, rise in hematocrit
-
Dengue shock syndrome
Weak pulse, cold clammy extremities, pulse pressure < 20 mmHg, hypotension
Expanded dengue syndrome
Encephalitis, myocarditis, hepatitis, renal failure, ARDS, hemophagocytosis.
Diagnosis:
Nonstructural protein 1 antigen detection (Rapid card test) – Sensitivity 76-93%, Specificity >98%.[25]
IgM, IgG serology (IgG titer > 1:1280 is 90% sensitive and 98% specific).
Treatment:[26]
Isotonic fluid infusion just sufficient to maintain effective circulation during the period of plasma leakage; guided by serial hematocrit determinations. (Level IA)
Blood transfusion is done only with overt bleeding/rapid fall in hematocrit.
Malaria
Causative organism: Plasmodium protozoa (P. falciparum, Plasmodium vivax, Plasmodium malariae [Odisha]).
Vector: Anopheles mosquito.
Plasmodium species are unevenly distributed across India. Orissa, Chhattisgarh, West Bengal, Jharkhand and Karnataka contribute the most to the endemicity.[27]
Pathophysiology:
Mechanical microcirculatory obstruction caused by cytoadherence to the vascular endothelium of parasitized RBC and sequestration
Intra-vascular hemolysis.
Clinical features:
Paroxysm of fever, shaking chills and sweats occur every 48 or 72 h, depending on species. Hepatosplenomegaly may be present.
Manifestations of severe malaria:[28]
Cerebral malaria (sometimes with coma)
Severe anemia
Hypoglycemia
Metabolic acidosis
Acute renal failure (serum creatinine > 3 mg/dl)
ARDS
Shock (“algid malaria”)
DIC
Hemoglobinuria
10. Hyperparasitemia (>5%).
Diagnosis:
Microscopy: Thick smears – parasite detection; Thin smears- species identification
Quantitative buffy coat test
Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) – histidine rich protein, lactate dehydrogenase antigen based immune-chromatography (Level IA)
-
Sensitivity and specificity > 95%
Malaria ruled out if two negative RDTs.[29]
Treatment:[28]
Drug of choice: Artesunate (Level IA)
Dose: 2.4 mg/kg i.v. bolus at admission, 12 h and 24 h; followed by once a day for 7 days + Doxycycline 100 mg p.o. 12 hourly.
Alternative: Quinine 20 mg/kg loading dose, followed by 10 mg/kg i.v. infusion 8 hourly + Doxycycline 100 mg p.o. 12 hourly.
Clindamycin is recommended in place of doxycycline in pregnant women and children.(Level IA) Exchange transfusion is a treatment option for parasitemia > 10%.(it is not recommended with Artesunate, Level IIA).
Enteric fever
Causative organism: Salmonella typhi, serovar paratyphi A, B or C
Transmission: focally contaminated food and water
Most prevalent in urban areas, with high incidence in children 15 years of age and younger.[30]
Pathophysiology: Bacteria spread throughout the reticulo-endothelial system and in areas of greatest macrophage concentration such as the Peyer's patches.
Clinical features: Incubation period 1-14 days.
Manifestations:
1st week - fever, headache, relative bradycardia
2nd week - Abdominal pain, diarrhea, constipation, hepatoslenomegaly, encephalopathy
3rd week - Intestinal bleeding, perforation, MODS.
Diagnosis:[31]
Typhidot (RDT) – Sensitivity 95-97%, Specificity > 89%, Level III
Widal test-non-specific
Blood culture – Gold standard, positive in 40-80% of patients
Bone marrow cultures – sensitivity 80-95%; may remain positive even after 5 days of pre-treatment.
Treatment:[32]
First line: Ceftriaxone i.v. 50-75 mg/kg/day for 10-14 days (Level IA) to cover MDR S. typhi.
Azithromycin and Ciprofloxacin are alternatives
Consider dexamethasone 3 mg/kg followed by 1 mg/kg 6 hourly for 48 h in selected cases with encephalopathy, hypotension or DIC (Level IB).
Japanese encephalitis
Causative organism: Japanese encephalitis virus,
Vector: Culex tritaeniorhynchus.
Prevalent in Southern, central and North-Eastern Indian states such as Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, Bihar, Maharastra, Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu.[33]
Pathophysiology: Virus reaches the central nervous system through leukocytes and affects various parts of the brain to cause vascular congestion, microglial proliferation, formation of gliomesenchymal nodules, focal or confluent areas of cystic necrosis and cerebral edema.
Clinical features: Incubation period averages 6-8 days, with a range of 4-15 days.
Prodromal period-fever, headache, vomiting and myalgia.
Neurological features[34] - range from mild confusion to agitation to overt coma. Parkinson like extrapyramidal signs are common, including masklike facies, tremor, rigidity and choreoathetoid movements.
Diagnosis:
IgM capture ELISA Serum: sensitivity 85-93%, Specificity 96-98%, CSF: Sensitivity 65-80%, Specificity 89-100%.
Treatment:
Supportive-Airway management, seizure control and management of raised intracranial pressure.
Appendix 1
ISCCM tropical fever Expert Committee
Chairperson: Dr Narendra Rungta, Chief, Critical Care Medicine, Jeevanrekha Critical Care and Trauma Hospital, Jaipur.
Members
Dr. T D Chugh, Professor Emeritus Pathology, PGIMS, Rohtak.
Professor Sunit Singhi, Head, Department of Pediatrics and In-charge PICU and Emergency Services, PGIMER, Chandigarh.
Professor S P Kalantri, Dept of Internal Medicine, JLN Medical College Wardha.
Professor, Dhruva Chaudhary, Head, Pulmonology and Critical Care PGIMS, Rohtak.
Professor George Verghese, Head, Infectious disease, Christian Medical College, Vellore.
Professor J V Peter, Head, Critical Care Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore.
Dr. Ashish Bhalla, Associate Professor, PGIMER, Chandigarh.
Dr Rajesh Mishra, Consultant Physician and Intensivist, Ahmedabad.
Dr Rajesh Bhagchandani, Intensivist Apex Hospital, Bhopal.
Footnotes
Source of Support: Nil
Conflict of Interest: None declared.
References
- 1.Diamon J. New York: W.W Norton and Company; 1997. Guns, Germs and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Patz JA, Graczyk TK, Geller N, Vittor AY. Effects of environmental change on emerging parasitic diseases. Int J Parasitol. 2000;30:1395–405. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(00)00141-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Abrahamsen SK, Haugen CN, Rupali P, Mathai D, Langeland N, Eide GE, et al. Fever in the tropics: Aetiology and case-fatality-A prospective observational study in a tertiary care hospital in South India. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:355. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chrispal A, Boorugu H, Gopinath KG, Chandy S, Prakash JA, Thomas EM, et al. Acute undifferentiated febrile illness in adult hospitalized patients: The disease spectrum and diagnostic predictors-An experience from a tertiary care hospital in South India. Trop Doct. 2010;40:230–4. doi: 10.1258/td.2010.100132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.John TJ, Dandona L, Sharma VP, Kakkar M. Continuing challenge of infectious diseases in India. Lancet. 2011;377:252–69. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61265-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Myers RM, Carey DE. Concurrent isolation from patient of two arboviruses, Chikungunya and dengue type 2. Science. 1967;157:1307–8. doi: 10.1126/science.157.3794.1307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bhalla A, Sharma N, Sharma A, Suri V. Concurrent infection with dengue and malaria. Indian J Med Sci. 2006;60:330–1. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kaur H, John M. Mixed infection due to leptospira and dengue. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2002;21:206. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Committee to Advice on Tropical Medicine and Travel. Canadian recommendations for fever in the returning international travellers. CCDR. 2011;37:1–15. doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v37i00a03. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Frean J, Blumberg L. Ch 5A. Brisbane: ACTM Publication; 2005. [Last accessed on 2013 Dec 23]. Tropical fevers part A. Viral, bacterial and fungal infections Primer of Tropical Medicine; pp. 1–18. Available from: HYPERLINK “http://www.tropmed.org/primer/chapter%2005a.pdf” http://www.tropmed.org/primer/chapter 05a.pdf . [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chaudhry D, Goyal S. Scrub typhus-resurgence of a forgotten killer. Indian J Anaesth. 2013;57:135–6. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.111836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pandey D, Sharma B, Chauhan V, Mokta J, Verma BS, Thakur S. ARDS complicating scrub typhus in Sub-Himalayan region. J Assoc Physicians India. 2006;54:812–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chrispal A, Boorugu H, Gopinath KG, Prakash JA, Chandy S, Abraham OC, et al. Scrub typhus: An unrecognized threat in South India-clinical profile and predictors of mortality. Trop Doct. 2010;40:129–33. doi: 10.1258/td.2010.090452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Koh GC, Maude RJ, Paris DH, Newton PN, Blacksell SD. Diagnosis of scrub typhus. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010;82:368–70. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rajapakse S, Rodrigo C, Fernando SD. Drug treatment of scrub typhus. Trop Doct. 2011;41:1–4. doi: 10.1258/td.2010.100311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fang Y, Huang Z, Tu C, Zhang L, Ye D, Zhu BP. Meta-analysis of drug treatment for scrub typhus in Asia. Intern Med. 2012;51:2313–20. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.51.7816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sethi S, Sharma N, Kakkar N, Taneja J, Chatterjee SS, Banga SS, et al. Increasing trends of leptospirosis in northern India: A clinico-epidemiological study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4:e579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kalita JB, Rahman H. Leptospirosis among patients with pyrexia of unknown origin in a hospital in Guwahati, Assam. Indian J Public Health. 2008;52:107–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chirathaworn C, Kaewopas Y, Poovorawan Y, Suwancharoen D. Comparison of a slide agglutination test, LeptoTek Dri-Dot, and IgM-ELISA with microscopic agglutination test for Leptospira antibody detection. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2007;38:1111–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Toyokawa T, Ohnishi M, Koizumi N. Diagnosis of acute leptospirosis. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2011;9:111–21. doi: 10.1586/eri.10.151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Brett-Major DM, Coldren R. Antibiotics for leptospirosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;2:CD008264. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008264.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Charan J, Saxena D, Mulla S, Yadav P. Antibiotics for the treatment of leptospirosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. Int J Prev Med. 2013;4:501–10. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chakravarti A, Arora R, Luxemburger C. Fifty years of dengue in India. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2012;106:273–82. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2011.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012. [Last accessed on 2013 Dec 23]. Handbook for Clinical Management of Dengue. WHO and Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR) Report. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/76887/1/9789241504713_eng.pdf?ua=1 . [Google Scholar]
- 25.Singh MP, Majumdar M, Singh G, Goyal K, Preet K, Sarwal A, et al. NS1 antigen as an early diagnostic marker in dengue: Report from India. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010;68:50–4. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Singhi S, Kissoon N, Bansal A. Dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever: Management issues in an intensive care unit. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2007;83:S22–35. doi: 10.2223/JPED.1622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hay SI, Gething PW, Snow RW. India's invisible malaria burden. Lancet. 2010;376:1716–7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61084-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010. [Last accessed on 2013 Dec 23]. Guidelines for the Treatment of Malaria. Available from: http://www.whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241547925_eng.pdf . [Google Scholar]
- 29.Maltha J, Gillet P, Jacobs J. Malaria rapid diagnostic tests in endemic settings. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19:399–407. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kanungo S, Dutta S, Sur D. Epidemiology of typhoid and paratyphoid fever in India. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2008;2:454–60. doi: 10.3855/jidc.161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Parry CM, Wijedoru L, Arjyal A, Baker S. The utility of diagnostic tests for enteric fever in endemic locations. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2011;9:711–25. doi: 10.1586/eri.11.47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Trivedi NA, Shah PC. A meta-analysis comparing the safety and efficacy of azithromycin over the alternate drugs used for treatment of uncomplicated enteric fever. J Postgrad Med. 2012;58:112–8. doi: 10.4103/0022-3859.97172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Joshi R, Kalantri SP, Reingold A, Colford JM., Jr Changing landscape of acute encephalitis syndrome in India: A systematic review. Natl Med J India. 2012;25:212–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sarkari NB, Thacker AK, Barthwal SP, Mishra VK, Prapann S, Srivastava D, et al. Japanese encephalitis (JE). Part I: Clinical profile of 1,282 adult acute cases of four epidemics. J Neurol. 2012;259:47–57. doi: 10.1007/s00415-011-6118-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]