Abstract
Protein kinase inhibitors represent a major class of targeted therapeutics that has made a positive impact on treatment of cancer and other disease indications. Among the promising kinase targets for further therapeutic development are members of the Protein Kinase C (PKC) family.The PKCs are central components of many signaling pathways that regulate diverse cellular functions including proliferation, cell cycle, differentiation, survival, cell migration, and polarity. Genetic manipulation of individual PKC isozymes has demonstrated that they often fulfill distinct, nonredundant cellular functions.11 Participation of PKC members in different intracellular signaling pathways reflects responses to varying extracellular stimuli, intracellular localization, tissue distribution, phosphorylation status, and intermolecular interactions. PKC activity, localization, phosphorylation, and/or expression are often altered in human tumors, and PKC isozymes have been implicated in various aspects of transformation, including uncontrolled proliferation, migration, invasion, metastasis, angiogenesis, and resistance to apoptosis. Despite the strong relationship between PKC isozymes and cancer, to date only atypical PKCiota has been shown to function as a bona fide oncogene, and as such is a particularly attractive therapeutic target for cancer treatment. In this review, we discuss the role of PKCiota in transformation and describe mechanism-based approaches to therapeutically target oncogenic PKCiota signaling in cancer.
Keywords: Atypical Protein Kinase Cι, cellular transformation, Phox-Bem1 (PB1) Domain, Mechanism-based therapeutics, oncogenic signaling
Introduction
Protein kinase inhibitors represent a major class of targeted therapeutics that has made a positive impact on treatment of cancer and other disease indications. There are currently 23 FDA-approved kinase inhibitors in use for various cancer and immune indications (see http://www.brimr.org/PKI/PKIs.htm). In addition, there is a rich pipeline of novel agents targeting disease-associated kinase targets in the clinic or at various stages of pre-clinical development (http://www.insightpharmareports.com/uploadedFiles/Executive_Summary%282%29.pdf). Among the promising kinase targets for further therapeutic development are members of the Protein Kinase C (PKC) family.
PKCs are a family of lipid-dependent serine/threonine kinases that represent a branch of the ACG kinase group.1 The PKC family is subdivided into 4 classes based on unique structural and regulatory properties. The conventional PKCs (cPKCs) are comprised of the PKCα, alternatively spliced PKCβI and βII, and PKCγ isozymes. These PKC isozymes bind diacylglycerol (DAG) and are activated by phosphatidylserine (PS) in a Ca2+-dependent manner, properties consistent with the initial description of PKC regulation.2 The novel PKCs (nPKCs) include the PKCδ, ε, η, θ, and μ isozymes. These PKC isozymes require DAG and PS for activation but are insensitive to Ca2+.3 The atypical PKCs (aPKCs), comprised of ζ and ι (also known as λ in rodents), are Ca2+-independent and do not respond to DAG.4, 5 Finally, the three PRK members (PRK 1–3) are also insensitive to Ca2+ and DAG.6, 7
The PKCs are central components of many signaling pathways that regulate diverse cellular functions including proliferation, cell cycle, differentiation, survival, cell migration, and polarity (recently reviewed in8–10). Genetic manipulation of individual PKC isozymes has demonstrated that they often fulfill distinct, non-redundant cellular functions.11 Participation of PKC members in different intracellular signaling pathways reflects responses to varying extracellular stimuli, intracellular localization, tissue distribution, phosphorylation status, and intermolecular interactions (recently reviewed in12). PKC activity, localization, phosphorylation, and/or expression are often altered in human tumors, and PKC isozymes have been implicated in various aspects of transformation, including uncontrolled proliferation, migration, invasion, metastasis, angiogenesis, and resistance to apoptosis (reviewed in10, 13). Despite the strong relationship between PKC isozymes and cancer, to date only atypical PKCι has been shown to function as a bona fide oncogene,14, 15 and as such is a particularly attractive therapeutic target for cancer treatment. In this review, we discuss the role of PKCι in transformation and describe mechanism-based approaches to therapeutically target oncogenic PKCι signaling in cancer.
General PKC Activation Mechanisms
Since Nishizuka's initial report of a proteolytically-activated protein kinase,16 it has been apparent that PKCs are present in cells in an inhibited basal state. Subsequent studies have identified upstream signaling pathways that allow PKCs to assume a fully “primed”, catalytically competent, inhibited basal state, which can be acutely activated to trigger PKC-dependent processes (reviewed in17, 18). These upstream signaling pathways lead to multi-site PKC phosphorylation on three conserved kinase domain serine/threonine phosphorylation sites – the activation loop, C-terminal turn, and hydrophobic motif sites - which in combination act to stabilize a fully active catalytic domain. In aPKC isoforms, the hydrophobic motif phosphorylation site acceptor amino acid is replaced with the partial phospho-mimetic glutamic acid. In the phosphorylated, primed state, the kinase and regulatory domains bind in an auto-inhibited conformation. Auto-inhibition appears to involve both a pseudosubstrate site present in all PKC family members, and other regulatory-kinase domain packing interactions19, 20 creating a `closed' inactive conformation.
Though no structures have been determined for an inactive full length PKC, a structure for a partially activated PKCβ structure has been described.21 A key feature of this structure is the orientation of the “NFD” motif within the kinase domain such that the Phe side chain makes contact with the ATP adenine ring22 to form a structure incompatible with an active, nucleotide-bound kinase domain. This structure likely reflects the fully-inhibited state, which is probably not nucleotide-bound, although the protein substrate binding pocket is expected to be occupied by the pseudosubstrate motif.
From this primed, inhibited state, acute activation involves loss of inhibitory regulatory-catalytic domain interactions and subsequent binding of Mg-ATP and protein substrates in the nucleotide and substrate binding pockets, respectively. For the classical PKC isoforms (cPKCα, β, γ), activation involves Ca2+-dependent recruitment of the kinase to anionic phospholipids, typically at the plasma membrane, through the Ca2+ binding C2 domains. Once at the membrane, the now proximal tandem C1A–C1B domain, is able to sample the membrane for DAG, a process that involves a conformation change exposing the otherwise obscured, intrinsically rather rigid DAG binding sites. The K/R-rich pseudosubstrate site, which is contiguous with the N-terminus of the C1A domain, interacts directly with anionic phospholipids to further stabilize membrane association. The nPKC isoforms are also activated by DAG binding to their C1A–C1B domains, but they do not display Ca2+ dependence for membrane recruitment. The C2 domains of certain nPKCs also have been shown to possess phosphotyrosine binding activity involved in localizing PKCδ to CDCP1, and in activation of PKCθ.23
Following activation, several PKC isoforms can bind to RACKs – receptors for activated C-kinases (reviewed in24). It has been proposed that RACK interactions can lock the kinase in an open conformation thereby contributing to maintenance of the active state. Studies on PKC-RACK interactions have led to the idea that expression of short synthetic forms of the domains responsible for these interactions can disrupt RACK-PKC interactions and serve as isoform-selective PKC inhibitors. Such inhibitors have been reported for many PKC isoforms, but to date not for the aPKC family. Similarly, protein scaffolds that direct localization of PKC isoforms prior to activation have been identified, among which are members of the A-Kinase Activating Proteins (AKAPs) (recently reviewed in25). AKAPs can bind specific PKC isoforms and link them to particular pathway outputs (eg. PKCη>PKD). Inhibitors of AKAP function in the form of short oligopeptides that compete for PKC-AKAP interactions have been described, however there is little evidence for a role of AKAPs in aPKC action.
aPKC Activation Mechanisms
The aPKCs (PKCζ and PKCι) are structurally and functionally distinct from other PKCs. The catalytic activity of the aPKCs does not require DAG, PS, or calcium, and the aPKCs do not serve as cellular receptors for phorbol esters.4, 26 Rather, PKCι can be activated by various acidic phospholipids including phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5 trisphosphate,7, 27 through specific protein–protein interactions mediated by a Phox Bem1 (PB1) domain within the N-terminal regulatory domain of the aPKCs (reviewed in28;discussed in detail below), and potentially through phosphorylation events that can regulate PKCι and its localization.
In addition to the priming phosphorylation events described above, PKCι has been reported to be phosphorylated by Src at tyrosines 256, 271, 325 in response to NGF stimulation.29 Site-directed mutagenesis indicates that Y325 phosphorylation is required for NGF-mediated PKCι activation and subsequent NFκB activation,29 whereas T256 phosphorylation regulates nuclear-cytoplasmic PKCι localization by modulating a canonical nuclear localization sequence (NLS).30 Src-mediated phosphorylation is also necessary for PKCι-dependent recruitment of β-COP to pre-golgi intermediates31 and the movement of PKCι into endosomes where it binds p62.32 Mass spectrometry analysis has revealed several other potential phosphorylation sites on PKCι,33 however, to date, neither the responsible kinase(s), nor the functional importance of these phosphorylation events, have been elucidated.
Protein-protein interactions regulate PKCι localization and activity
The aPKCs possess a region within their regulatory domain that is unique to the atypical PKCs, the Phox-Bem (PB)1 domain. The PB1 domain is a structurally conserved motif found on a family of signaling molecules (reviewed in28) that mediates their homo- and heterotypic interactions through specific interaction codes. The PB1 domain interactions formed between aPKCs and other PB1 domain containing proteins such as ZIP/p62, Par6 and MEK5 [MAPK(mitogen-activated protein kinase)/ ERK(extracellular-signal-regulated kinase)kinase 5] are critical for aPKC activation, localization and function in several contexts, including cell polarity, cell proliferation, cell survival, and more recently cell transformation.14, 34–38
Perhaps the best studied PB1-PB1 domain interaction involving PKCι is that between PKCι and the polarity protein Par6, which is essential for epithelial cell polarity (recently reviewed in39). PKCι interacts with Par6 to form a heterodimeric complex that is activated when Par6 binds to GTP-loaded cdc42/Rac1. Par6 binds PKCι through a characteristic PB1-PB1 interaction, for which a crystal structure has been solved.40 Par3 subsequently binds the PKCι-Par6 complex through a Par3 PDZ domain interaction with the kinase domain of PKCι, and a PDZ:PDZ domain interaction between Par3 and Par6. Par3 functions to localize PKCι/Par6 to the apical compartment of polarized cell membranes through a network of interactions involving nectin-willin-afadin (recently reviewed in39). The isoprenylated small GTPases cdc42/Rac1 are typically membrane-associated in their active GTP-bound states, contributing to the association of the cdc42/Rac-Par6-PKCι-Par3 complex with the apical membrane. Interestingly, a frequent mechanism by which human tumors lose polarity, a hallmark of cancer, is through loss of Par3 and/or other components of tight junctions such as E-cadherin.41, 42 As a consequence, PKCι is frequently mis-localized within the cytoplasm and nucleus of transformed cells and human tumors14, 15, 43, 44 Despite the loss of membrane restricted localization, recent studies have demonstrated that PKCι retains its association with Par6 in tumor cells;35, 36, 45 and this complex, and PKCι activity, is required for maintenance of the transformed phenotype.34–36, 45–47
PKCι is Oncogenic in Human Tumors
The PKCι gene (PRKCI) is frequently amplified in human cancers
The PKCι gene, PRKCI, resides on chromosome 3q26, one of the most frequently amplified genomic regions in human cancers. Compelling evidence across multiple tumor types demonstrate that PRKCI is a relevant target of 3q26 amplification. PRKCI copy number gains are observed in ~80% of human primary lung squamous cell carcinomas (LSCC),14 ~70% of serous epithelial ovarian cancer15 and ~53% of ESCC tumors.48 Consistent with these published findings, analysis of human tumor genomic datasets from the Cancer Genome Atlas, and other large scale sequencing projects (compiled at http://www.cbioportal.org/public-portal/), demonstrates that PRKCI copy number gains are prominent in many major forms of human cancer, being most prevalent in cervical, head and neck, lung squamous and ovarian serous cancers (Figure 1A). Surprisingly however, other major tumor types such as bladder, breast, kidney, lung adenocarcinoma, stomach and uterine cancers also harbor frequent PRKCI copy number gains, albeit less frequently than the tumor types mentioned above. Interestingly, gene expression data from these same tumor datasets reveal a strong positive correlation between PRKCI copy number gains and elevated PKCι mRNA expression across these tumor types (Figure 1B). Thus, tumor-specific gene copy number gain in PRKCI is a major genetic mechanism driving PKCι expression in human tumors. In contrast, PRKCI is rarely mutated with frequencies ranging from 0–3% across tumor types. Of approximately 9,000 human tumor samples derived from different tissues analyzed for PRKCI somatic mutations in the COSMIC database (http://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/cancergenome/projects/cosmic/), only 0.81% of tumors harbor a PRKCI mutation. Although of low frequency, one mutated site (R471), which has been reported on multiple occasions, maps to a substrate docking domain required for PKCι to support cellular polarization, while not influencing catalytic capacity per se.49 Thus, R471 mutation mediates a change of function wherein one aspect of PKCι output potential is selectively compromised.
Figure 1. PRKCI copy number gain is a major genetic mechanism driving PRKCI overexpression in human tumors.
A. The percentage of each listed tumor type harboring copy number gains, somatic mutation or multiple alterations in the indicated tumor types is shown. Data were compiled from the cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics (http://www.cbioportal.org/public-portal/). B. PRKCI copy number gain correlates with PRKCI overexpression across human tumor types indicating that copy number gain is a major causative genetic mechanism driving PKCι expression in these tumors. For each of the tumor types shown in A, the % of tumors harboring PRKCI gene copy number gains was plotted against the % of tumors exhibiting PRKCI overexpression. A direct relationship exists between PRKCI copy number gain and overexpression across tumor types (correlation co-efficient R2=0.7756).
PKCι is over-express and mislocalized in human tumors
PKCι is frequently overexpressed in the majority of tumor types examined (recently reviewed in50 (Figure 1). PKCι is overexpressed at the mRNA and protein level in NSCLC, ovarian, brain, breast, rhabdomyosarcomas,51 melanomas, esophageal, gastric, colon, liver, pancreas, and bile duct tumors. Interestingly, immunohistochemical analyses have reveal PKCι overexpression in tumor cells, with little to no staining in tumor-associated stroma and adjacent matched normal lung epithelium, indicating that PKCι overexpression is largely restricted to tumor cells. PKCι is frequently mislocalized in several tumor types. Whereas PKCι is localized to the apical and not the basal membrane of normal ovarian surface epithelial cells and benign serous and mucinous cysts, apical membrane staining was lost in 85% of serous low malignant samples and in all serous epithelial ovarian cancers analyzed where staining was diffuse throughout the tumor cells.15 NSCLC tumors reveal intense PKCι cytoplasmic and nuclear staining whereas adjacent normal lung epithelial cells exhibited membrane staining.14 Similarly, PKCι localized throughout the cytoplasm of primary breast tumor cells, whereas it localized to the apical membrane of normal breast epithelial cells.44 Cytoplasmic PKCι in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) correlated with reduced cell-cell contact, loss of both adherens and tight junction formation, reduced E-cadherin expression, and an increase in cytoplasmic beta-catenin.43 Taken together, these findings indicate that PKCι overexpression and intracellular mislocalization is a frequent event in cancer cells that is associated with loss of cellular polarity.
Although PRKCI gene copy gain is a major mechanism that drives PKCι overexpression in some human tumor types, alternative mechanisms may also promote PKCι overexpression. PKCι is frequently overexpressed in tumor types that harbor infrequent 3q26 amplification including colon cancer,37 pancreatic cancer,52, 53 and chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML).54 In CML cells, a Bcr-Abl/Mek/Erk signaling axis transcriptionally activates PKCι expression through an Elk1 element within the promoter region of PRKCI.54 Whether this or similar transcriptional mechanisms are relevant in other tumor types remains undetermined. Furthermore, PKCι activity has been shown to be primed by phosphorylation and, at least in the related PKCα it is documented that dephosphorylation at these sites can trigger PKC degradation.55 However, it is presently unclear whether PKCι phosphorylation and other post-translational mechanisms serve to regulate PKCι stability in tumor cells.
PKCι is required for the cancer cell phenotype
PKCι is required for maintenance of the transformed phenotype of cancer cells, regulating transformed growth, survival and chemoresistance of several tumor types including CML, prostate cancer, NSCLC, glioma, and ESCC (reviewed in50). Genetic or pharmacologic inhibition of PKCι blocks transformed growth of NSCLC, ovarian cancer, ESCC,56 colon carcinoma, PDAC,53 and rhabdomyosarcoma51 cells. In addition, PKCι promotes cellular migration and or invasion of NSCLC, ESCC,56 PDAC, and glioma cells. PKCι is also critical for tumorigenesis in vivo. Orthotopic or subcutaneous implantation of NSCLC, ESCC,56 and PDAC cells in which PKCι has been genetically-depleted into immune deficient mice results in impaired tumor initiation, growth and metastatic potential. Transgenic mice expressing constitutively active PKCι (caPKCι) in the colonic epithelium exhibit a higher incidence of colon tumors when compared to transgenic mice expressing kdPKCι or non-transgenic littermates after exposure to the colon-specific carcinogen azoxymethane.37 Furthermore, transgenic caPKCι mice develop mostly malignant carcinomas whereas non-transgenic mice develop mainly benign tubular adenomas.37 Consistent with the requirements of PKCι for cellular invasion, ESCC56 and PDAC53 cells with reduced PKCι expression exhibit a decrease in metastasis. These findings demonstrate that PKCι is functionally required for the transformed behavior of cancer cells and indicate roles for PKCι in tumor initiation, progression and metastatic behavior.
PKCι expression predicts survival and is associated with tumor aggressiveness
Reflecting its functional role in cellular transformation, PKCι expression profiling may be of prognostic value to predict survival in patients with various tumors types (reviewed in50). Elevated PKCι expression is associated with decreased survival in patients with NSCLC, cholangiocarcinoma, ovarian, bile duct, and prostate tumors. In other cancer types such as ESCC and breast, PKCι expression is greater in later stage tumors suggesting a role for PKCι in tumor aggressiveness, progression and metastasis. Thus, PKCι expression may be useful for identifying patients that are more likely to relapse and those who may benefit from more aggressive adjuvant chemotherapeutic treatment. In this regard, patients with high PKCι expressing gastric tumors are more likely to experience relapse,57 and elevated PKCι in early stage NSCLC tumors is associated with poor outcome.14
Oncogenic PKCι Signaling
Upstream activators of PKCι
PKCι participates in a number of oncogenic signaling pathways that promote transformation (reviewed in10, 50, 58). PKCι plays a critical role in oncogenic Ras-mediated transformation. Exogenous over-expression of PKCι increases the size and number of soft agar colonies formed by oncogenic Ras-transformed ovarian surface epithelial cells.59 Likewise, PKCι activity is elevated in Ras-transformed intestinal epithelial cells, and is required for invasion and anchorage independent growth of these cells in vitro. The importance of PKCι as a downstream effector of oncogenic Rasin vivo has been demonstrated in several mouse models of K-Ras-mediated tumorgenesis.37, 60 In a mouse model of K-Ras-mediated colon cancer, K-RasLA2 transgenic mice, which contain a latent oncogenic K-Ras G12D allele that is activated by spontaneous recombination, develop oncogenic K-Ras-dependent aberrant crypt foci (ACF) in the colonic epithelium.37 ACFs are likely precursors to colon cancer61 and harbor many of the same genetic and biochemical alterations found in colon tumors, including activating K-Ras mutations. KrasLA/kdPKCι mice, which express kinase deficient PKCι in the colonic epithelium, develop significantly fewer ACF than KrasLA mice.62 A mouse model in which oncogenic KrasG12D is activated by Cre-mediated recombination in the lung with or without simultaneous genetic loss of the mouse PKCι gene (Prkci) was used to assess whether PKCι is involved in lung tumor development.60 Genetic disruption of Prkci blocked KRas-mediated lung tumor formation in vivo, a phenotype that was traced to a defect in KRas-mediated expansion of bronchioalveolar stem cells (BASCs) in Prkci deficient mice.60 Interestingly, Kras induced uncontrolled proliferation and morphological transformation of BASCs maintained in three dimensional culture.60 Whereas non-transformed BASCs form acinar structures characterized by a single large central lumen and a single layer of polarized epithelial cells, Kras-mediated transformation is characterized by disruption of cellular polarity, loss of the central lumen and uncontrolled growth of BASC cells as an amorphous mass.60 These morphological and proliferative changes induced by oncogenic Kras are strictly dependent upon PKCι expression.60 These data provide direct evidence that PKCι-dependent, Kras-mediated transformation involves both disruption of cellular polarity and stimulation of transformed growth.60 BASCs exhibit stem-like properties and are thought to be the tumor-initiating cells in KRas-mediated lung adenocarcinoma formation.63 Thus, Prkci is required for the earliest identifiable events in KRas mediated lung tumorigenesis in vivo. PKCι is also required for maintenance of the transformed phenotype and in vivo tumorigenic potential of established human cancer cells harboring oncogenic KRAS mutations.36 Expression of kdPKCι or RNAi knockdown of PKCι in NSCLC cells that harbor an oncogenic KRas mutation resulted in reduced formation and growth of xenograft tumors in immune-deficient mice.36 Greater than 90% of pancreatic tumors harbor oncogenic KRas mutation, and orthotopic implantation of KRas mutant pancreatic cancer cells depleted of PKCι into the pancreas of nude mice led to decreased tumor burden, reduced markers of angiogenesis and fewer metastases.53
Several studies have implicated aPKCs in Src-mediated transformation.30, 64 Src is reported to directly bind and phosphorylate aPKCs at multiple sites to promote their activation.30, 64 As noted above, Src-mediated phosphorylation of tyrosine 325 was shown to be functionally required for Src activation of PKCι in response to NGF.29 In NSCLC cells, NNK has been reported to increase c-Src-activated PKCι, which in turn phosphorylates Bad resulting in reduced Bad/Bcl-XL interaction.64 PKCι-mediated phosphorylation abrogates the pro-apoptotic function of Bad, and enhances cell survival and decreased sensitivity of NNK treated NSCLC cells to VP-16 and cisplatin.64 Genetic or pharmacological inhibition of Src led to decreased aPKC activation loop phosphorylation and reduced proliferation of androgen dependent prostate cancer cells.65 Additionally, inhibition of aPKC decreased v-Src-mediated morphological transformation, migration, matrix degradation and invasion of transformed NIH3T3 cells.66
Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) has been implicated in the activation of aPKC. The PI3K lipid metabolite, PIP3, may promote aPKC activation through 3-phosphoinositide dependent protein kinase-1 (PDK-1) T403 loop phosphorylation.67 Consistently, RNAi-mediated knockdown of PDK1 inhibited priming phosphorylation of PKCι at T555 and reduced PKCι expression in glioma cells.68 Recently PI3K/PKCι signaling has been linked to the alternative splicing of Bcl-x pre-mRNA to promote cell survival in NSCLC cells.69 NSCLC, breast, cervical, and esophageal tumors exhibit increased expression of anti-apoptotic Bcl-x(L) when compared to their respective matched normal tissues. Interestingly, treatment of NSCLC cells with PI3K or pan-PKC inhibitors resulted in a reduced ratio of Bcl-x(L)/(s) splice variants as did knockdown of PKCι.69 Furthermore, over-expression of Bcl-x(L) could rescue PKCι knockdown mediated inhibition of NSCLC cell growth in soft agar. Thus, PI3K/PKCι promote an antiapoptotic/prosurvival phenotype in NSCLC cells through modulation of Bcl-x(L)/(s) splice variant ratios.
PKCι is a downstream effector of Brc-Abl-mediated chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) cell survival and resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs.38, 70 In K562 CML cells, Brc-Abl activates a Ras/Mek/Erk signaling pathway that stimulates PKCι expression through an Elk1 transcription site within the PKCι promoter.54 PKCι is activated upon treating K562 cells with taxol,38 and overexpression of PKCι leads to enhanced resistance of K562 cells to taxol-induced apoptosis, whereas inhibition of PKCι expression enhances taxol mediated apoptotic cell death of K562 cells.70 Furthermore, inhibition of Bcr-Abl blocked taxol-induced PKCι activation and sensitized K562 cells to taxol mediated apoptosis. In contrast, expression of caPKCι protects K562 cells from chemotherapeutic drug-mediated apoptosis.70 Interestingly, in Bcr-Abl negative HL60 promyelocytic leukemia cells, taxol did not induce sustained PKCι activation.38 Thus activation of PKCι is an important downstream mediator of Bcr-Abl-induced chemotherapeutic resistance.
Effectors of PKCι signaling
PKCι promotes cell survival in some tumor cells through activation of NFκB signaling. PKCι associates with IKKαβ and IκBα in TNFα -treated DU-145 prostate carcinoma cells where it is thought to phosphorylate IKKαβ, which subsequently phosphorylates IκBα resulting in NFκB/p65 translocation into the nucleus and transcriptional activation of targets.71 Interestingly, PKCι does not associate with IKKαβ and IκBα in transformed non-tumorigenic RWPE-1 prostate cells. Rather, TNFα treatment of RWPE-1 induces association of PKCζ with both IKKαβ and IκBα suggesting that PKCι may be preferentially used to activate NFκB pathways in tumorigenic prostate cancer cells.71 As described above, CML cells expressing Bcr-Abl are resistant to chemotherapy-induced apoptosis as a result of increased PKCι activation.38, 70, 72 Treatment of CML cells with taxol induces IκBα phosphorylation and NFκB nuclear translocation and transcriptional activation and disruption of PKCι function sensitizes K562 cells to taxol-induced apoptosis and inhibits RelA transcriptional activity.72 Overexpression of NFκB in K562 cells with disrupted PKCι function, rescues taxol-induced apoptosis. In addition, overexpression of constitutively active PKCι further upregulates NFκB transcriptional activity. Thus, PKCι induction of NFκB transactivation is important for Bcr-Abl–dependent resistance to taxol-induced apoptosis.70, 72 Glioblastoma multiforme are highly resistant to most standard cancer chemotherapeutics.73 RNAi-mediated depletion of PKCι results in sensitization of U87MG glioblastoma cells to cisplatin.73 Interestingly, unlike CML and prostate cancer cells, activation of the NFκB pathway does not appear to be a major mechanism driving PKCι dependent chemoresistance in glioblastoma. Rather, PKCι-mediated survival appears to result from PKCι-mediated attenuation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling that protects these cells against cytotoxicity to chemotherapeutic agents.73 Thus, PKCι appears to function in several signaling pathways that promote cell survival in different tumor cell types.
Given the crucial role that polarity plays in maintaining the highly organized epithelial architecture, it is perhaps not surprising that several components of the polarity complex, particularly PKCι, Par6, Par3 and Rac1 have been directly implicated in oncogenesis. Aberrant expression of genes associated with cellular transformation such as ErbB2, Ras, NOTCH and TGFβ disrupt cell polarity and cause mislocalization of polarity complex components from the apical-lateral membrane. Activation of ErbB2 disrupts cell polarity through a mechanism in which ErbB2 causes mislocalization of Par6 from the apical-lateral border and disassociates Par3 from the aPKC/Par6 complex.46 Likewise, in rat proximal epithelial cells, TGFβ disrupts cell polarity through downregulation of Par3 and redistribution of aPKC/Par6 complex from the cell membrane to the cytoplasm.74 A recent report demonstrated that loss of Par3 cooperates with the intracellular domain of NOTCH (NICD) or H-Ras to induce breast tumorigenesis, tumor invasion and metastasis.75 A model was proposed in which the loss of Par3 in transformed cells triggers mislocalization and activation of aPKC.75 aPKC in turn activates a JAK/Stat3/MMP signaling cascade that induces changes in the ECM that promote tumor cell invasion and metastasis.75
Rac1 is a key downstream intermediate in oncogenic PKCι signal in multiple tumor types including the colon,37 lung,35, 36 and pancreas.53 In NSCLC cells, the PB1:PB1 interaction between PKCι and Par6 is required for the transformed phenotype and Rac1 activation.34, 36, 53 RNAi mediated depletion of PKCι, Par6 or Rac1 blocks transformation.35 Expression of PB1 domain mutants of PKCι or Par6 that inhibit the PKCι-Par6 interaction fail to restore transformation in PKCι and Par6 knockdown cells respectively,35 and either decreased PKCι or Par6 expression inhibits activation of Rac1, whereas expression of a constitutively active Rac1 allele (RacV12) in either PKCι- or Par6-depleted NSCLC cells restores transformation.35 Thus, Rac1 is a key effector of PKCι-mediated transformation in NSCLC. Proteomics analysis of proteins that associate with the PKCι-Par6 complex in NSCLC cells identified ECT2, a Rho family GTPase guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF), as a component of the PKCι-Par6 complex.34, 47 RNAi-mediated knock down of ECT2 inhibits Rac1 activity and blocks transformed growth, invasion, and tumorigenicity of NSCLC cells.34 Interestingly, the role of ECT2 in NSCLC transformation is distinct from its well established role in cytokinesis.34 In NSCLC cells ECT2 is mislocalized to the cytoplasm where it binds the PKCι-Par6 complex. Knock down of either PKCι or Par6 causes redistribution of ECT2 to the nucleus and loss of transformed growth and invasion.34 PKCι directly phosphorylates ECT2 at a single site, T328, in vitro and modulates T328 phosphorylation in NSCLC cells.47 T328 ECT2 phosphorylation is required for efficient binding of ECT2 to the PKCι-Par6 complex, activation of Rac1, and the transformed phenotype of NSCLC cells.47 Interestingly, the ECT2 gene resides on chromosome 3q26 in close proximity to PRKCI. Expression analysis in primary NSCLC tumors demonstrated that PRKCI and ECT2 are co-amplified and overexpressed in NSCLC.34 Thus, ECT2 and PKCι are genetically linked through coordinate gene amplification in NSCLC tumors, and biochemically and functionally linked in NSCLC transformation through formation of an oncogenic PKCι-Par6- ECT2 complex that drives NSCLC cell transformation.
The PKCι/Par6 complex has also been implicated in transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT).76 TGF-β induces PKCι activation and TβRII and PKCι cooperate to phosphorylate Par6 at S345, a phosphorylation event required for TGF-β EMT and subsequent migration and invasion of NSCLC cells.76
In addition to Rac1, RhoB, another small GTPase, has been implicated in oncogenic PKCι signaling. Microarray analysis of PKCι-regulated genes in glioblastoma cells identified RhoB as being up-regulated in PKCι knockdown cells.77 Overexpression on RhoB in glioblastoma cells led to decreased proliferation, migration and invasion.77 Interestingly, constitutive expression of RhoB can repress PKCι activation implying a model whereby PKCι represses RhoB to promote an invasive phenotype, and RhoB repression of PKCι activity may lead to a noninvasive phenotype in glioblastoma cells.
In order to identify potential transcriptional targets of PKCι required for transformation, a genome-wide gene expression analysis has been carried out in H1703 NSCLC cells expressing either control or PKCι RNAi.35 The matrix metalloproteinase 10/stromolysin 2 (MMP10) emerged from this analysis as a major PKCι target.35 RNAi mediated depletion of PKCι, Par6, or Rac1 inhibits MMP10 expression in NSCLC cells,35 and similar to PKCι and Par6 knockdown, RNAi mediated knockdown of MMP10 blocks anchorage-independent growth and cell invasion. in NSCLC cells35 In addition, loss of transformed growth and invasion in PKCι KD or Par6 KD NSCLC cells is rescued by addition of catalytically-active MMP10.35 MMP10 is also a critical downstream effector of PKCι in Kras-transformed BASCs.60 Similar to Prkci, Mmp10 is required for BASC transformation and tumor initiation in vivo.78 Analysis of primary tumors revealed that MMP10 is overexpressed in NSCLC and MMP10 expression correlates positively with PKCι expression.35, 78 Gene set enhancement analysis of publicly-available gene expression profiles showed that elevated Mmp10 expression correlates strongly with both cancer stem cell and tumor metastasis gene signatures.78 Thus, expression of MMP10 is regulated through the PKCι-Par6-Rac1 signaling axis, and represents a key downstream effector in PKCι-mediated transformation in lung cancer cells. In addition to MMP10, a gene expression meta-analysis in primary lung adenocarcinomas identified the genes COPB2, ELF3, RFC4, and PLS1 as PKCι transcriptional targets.79 RNAi-mediated knock down of PKCι in lung adenocarcinoma (LAC) cell lines led to a significant reduction in expression of each of the four target genes, indicating that PKCι regulates the expression of these four genes in LAC cells.79 RNAi-mediated knock down of each of these genes led to significant inhibition of anchorage independent growth and cellular invasion demonstrating that each of them play a role in LAC tranformation.79 Several of these PKCι-regulated genes are coordinately overexpressed with PKCι in other major tumor types including lung squamous cell carcinoma, breast, colon prostate, pancreatic, and glioblastomas.79 suggesting that these PKCι regulated genes may serve as useful biomarkers in determining the effectiveness of PKCι-directed therapies and may themselves serve as targets for the development of novel prognostic markers and/or therapeutic agents.
Therapeutic Targeting of aPKCι
As described above there is compelling evidence for aPKC as a target for intervention in cancer. In principle, interventions in aPKC could be afforded by: (i) modulating transcription/translation, for instance through an anti-sense approach as has been pursued for PKCα (ii) blocking upstream priming events; (iii) interfering with acute activation processes; (iv) modifying protein substrate/scaffold interactions; (v) inhibiting catalytic activity (Figure 2). We will comment here on those avenues where progress has been made in aPKC intervention.
Figure 2. Potential modes of PRKCI-directed therapeutic intervention.
Five potential modes of therapeutic intervention are outlined: (I) control of PRKCI transcription, (II) disruption of PB1 domain protein-protein interactions between PKCι and its oncogenic partner Par6; (III) inhibition of upstream kinase cascades that regulate PKCι priming; (IV) inhibition of PKCι-scaffold/protein substrate interactions; (V) inhibition of PKCι catalytic activity through competitive inhibition of ATP binding. See text for discussion and details.
Priming processes
The priming pathways have been reported to involve P13kinase, PDK1 and TORC2 (see above) and all these have been the object of drug development programs. For the class I P13kinases (α, β, γ, δ) there are multiple inhibitors of varying isoform selectivity under investigation clinically see80. However it remains moot as to whether the product of this class I PI3 kinase pathway, phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5 trisphosphate, is generally rate limiting for the priming of aPKC (either directed at aPKC itself or through the PDK1 PH domain). By contrast the inhibition of PDK1 or mTOR catalytic activity might be expected to influence aPKC priming directly, albeit as a chronic and not an acute effect.17 However as discussed above, the turnover of these sites in PKCs is generally much slower than found in for example Akt/PKB. Thus, it is unclear whether even chronic inhibition will greatly influence the steady state phosphorylation of aPKC which will tend to ratchet towards an occupied state.17 Multiple agents have been characterized retrospectively as targeting PDK1 (eg UCN-01 a broad specificity kinase inhibitor which potently inhibits PDK181 or targeted to PDK1 by design (eg AR-12, GSK2334470).82 A number of these agents have been in, are in, or are approved for clincial testing. Whether any of these agents influence the aPKC pathway in patients has not been reported. A more selective approach to intervention in the PDK1-aPKC cascade has come from targeting the aPKC PIF pocket which is involved in the PDK1-PKCι interaction (see19, 83). Several small molecule inhibitors that act at the PKCι PIF pocket have been identified.19, 84 The application and efficacy of such approaches to PKCι awaits further developments. The immunosuppressive agent rapamycin, acting via TOR85 has been used to target mammalian TOR in the context of TORC1. Rapamycin and derivatives with improved PK properties have been in clinical trials and some single agent activity has been documented. However the evidence indicates that PKC isoforms are targeted directly by TORC2 and not TORC1 and it is evident that TORC2 itself can contribute to the transformed phenotype.86 Agents which block both TORC1 and TORC2 activity have been developed and, interestingly, show greater activity in vitro and in vivo than TORC1 selective agents.87 It will be of interest to monitor whether biomarkers of aPKC action are modulated in patient studies with these agents, although as noted above the kinetics of steady state change in aPKC priming might not afford much leverage through these upstream pathways.
Partner interactions
As noted above there are no RACK-interaction directed inhibitors of the aPKCs and indeed there are no RACKs formally described for this branch of the family. However there are agents that suppress partner interactions. Interference of one such aPKC partner interaction has been proposed as a mechanisms of action of the triterpenoid ursolic acid,88 a compound present in many fruits, enriched in apple peel and touted as a body-building supplement. Ursolic acid has been reported to block aPKCζ-sequestosome 1 interaction resulting in and associated with this is a net priming dephosphorylation of aPKCζ;88 this drug may well influence both aPKC isoforms, since antibodies detecting these priming site phosphorylations not distinguish aPKCι and aPKCζ. Derivatives of ursolic acid have been reported to display increased cytotoxicity in a range of tumor cell lines,89 however the structure activity relationship for these derivatives in relation to aPKC-sequestosome1 interaction have not been determined, nor have they been shown to modulate any of the other pathways affected by ursolic acid (for example NFκB, STAT3; reviewed in90). It remains to be seen whether ursolic is the basis of an aPKC intervention.
PB1 domain inhibitors
The PKCι PB1 domain is uniquely present in atypical PKCs, and the PB1 domain interaction formed between PKCι and Par6 is required for the oncogenic PKCι-Par6-Rac1-MMP10 signaling axis that promotes anchorage-independent growth and invasion of human NSCLC cells in vitro and tumorigenicity in vivo.35 Therefore, compounds that can disrupt the PB1-PB1 domain interaction between PKCι and Par6 may serve as a novel mechanism-based therapeutic intervention. A high throughput screen for small molecular weight compounds that can disrupt the PB1-PB1 domain interaction between PKCι and Par6 identified gold-containing compounds such as aurothioglucose (ATG), aurothiomalate (ATM) and auranofin (ANF) as selective and relatively potent inhibitors of PKCι and Par6 binding.91 These compounds are FDA-approved for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis patients,92 and ANF is still used clinically. These compounds exhibit dose dependent inhibition of PKCι-Par6 binding with IC50s of ~1μM, good antitumor activity, and they inhibit PKCι-mediated Rac1 activation and anchorage independent growth of NSCLC cells in vitro and tumorigenicity in vivo.91 The inhibitory efficacy of ATM has been tested on a panel of cell lines that represent the major subtypes of lung cancer including lung adenocarcinoma (LAC), lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC), large cell carcinoma (LCC), and small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC).93 ATM inhibited transformed growth in all cell lines tested with IC50s ranging from ~300 nM – 100 μM.93 Interestingly, ATM sensitivity among this group of cell lines did not correlate with tumor sub-type, KRas status, or sensitivity to a panel of standard chemotherapeutic agents frequently used to treat lung cancer patients, including cis-platin, placitaxel, and gemcitabine.93 Rather, PKCι expression (measured by mRNA or protein) was the major molecular characteristic of lung cancer cells corresponding to ATM responsiveness.93 ATM inhibits tumorigenicity of lung cell tumors in vivo at plasma drug concentrations consistent with the IC50 of the cell lines to ATM in vitro and ATM plasma drug concentrations routinely achieved in RA patients.93 Given the correlation between PKCι expression and ATM sensitivity, PKCι expression profiling in lung tumor samples may be useful in identifying lung cancer patients most likely to respond to these agents. In addition to NSCLC, the use of ATM and other gold-compound PKCι targeted therapy has also shown promise in other tumor types. Treatment of primary rhabdomyosarcoma cell cultures with ATM resulted in decreased interaction between PKCι and Par6, decreased Rac1 activity and reduced cell viability at clinically relevant concentrations.51 Combination therapy studies of ATM and vincristine (VCR), a microtubule inhibitor currently used in treatment regimens of rhabdomyosarcoma, exhibited synergistic anti-proliferative effects in cells and a trend towards further sensitizing tumors to VCR treatment in vivo.51 ATM mediated inhibition of PKCι in the prostate cancer cell line, PC3U, induced apoptosis, but ATM treatment did not affect the growth of human primary epithelial prostate cells, PrEC.94 A phase I dose escalation trial to determine an appropriate dosing regimen and describe toxicities associated with ATM in patients with advanced NSCLC, ovarian cancer, and pancreatic cancer was recently completed.95 ATM was well tolerated at the MTD of 50mg IM/weekly, and exhibited modest signs of tumor response (stable disease in 2/15 patients while on therapy) in this heavily pretreated patient population. Further trials are ongoing with the related compound auranofin (ANF), which exhibits higher potency for PKCι-Par6 inhibition (unpublished observations).
The precise mechanism by which ATG, ATM and ANF elicit their inflammatory activities in RA is unknown. A proposed mechanism of action is the formation of gold-cysteine adducts with target cellular proteins (reviewed in50). The PB1 domain of the aPKCs contains a cysteine residue, (Cys69) that is not present in other PB1 domain-containing proteins. The crystal structure of the PKCι-Par6 complex reveals that Cys69 is located within the conserved OPR, PC, and AID (OPCA) motif of PKCι at the binding interface between PKCι and Par6 in the complex.45 Molecular modeling of the interaction between ATM and the PKCι PB1 domain, predicts formation of an adduct between Cys69 and ATM that would cause steric hindrance to Par6 binding.45 Mutation of PKCι Cys69 to isoleucine (C69I) or valine (C69V), amino acids that frequently exist at this position in other PB1 domains, does not alter Par6 binding but makes PKCι resistant to ATM inhibitory effects on PKCι-Par6 binding in vitro.45 Consistent with these findings, expression of the C69I PKCι mutant in NSCLC cells supports transformed growth and renders these cells resistant to the inhibitory effects of ATM on transformed growth.45
Substrate interactions
The regulatory domain pseudosubstrate sites from individual isoforms have been exploited as natural inhibitors to generate short oligopeptide inhibitors.96 Thus cell permeable forms of synthetic pseudosubstrate site sequences have been employed to block function of their cognate target eg PKCα derived pseudosubstrate site targeting PKCα. A critical issue for use of these peptide inhibitors is specificity. Typically these peptides are employed in the 10–100µM range and it is questionable as to whether they display specificity at these concentrations. Binding of one PKC isoform to a non-cognate pseudosubstrate site sequence is well established, as evidenced by the use of synthetic pseudosubstrate site oligopeptides with A>S changes that converts them to good substrates.97 These oligopeptides exhibit poor differentiating ability between PKC isoforms. A more specific inhibitor that is protein substrate competitive has been identified for aPKCι and that is [4-(5-amino-4-carbamoylimidazol-1-yl)-2,3-dihydroxycyclopentyl] methyl dihydrogen phosphate.68 This drug was shown to inhibit PKCι competitively with respect to a protein substrate (myelin basic protein) in vitro and to block proliferation of neuroblastoma cells potentially via CDK7.68 The specific site of action will be of interest for this class of compounds, moreover their selectivity for aPKCι and potentially for a subset of its substrates offers some interesting opportunities for fine tuning interventions.
The majority of PKC inhibitors are typical protein kinase small molecule inhibitors that compete for the ATP binding pocket. Notably, until very recently, no compounds had shown any selectivity for the aPKC isoforms and much pharmacological dissection of the PKC family had exploited differences between compounds of decreasing specificity: Gö6976 (cPKC specific;98), bis-indolyl maleimide I (BIMI; cPKC and nPKC selective;99) and Gö6983 (cPKC, nPKC and aPKC selective);100 so, for example, a process inhibited by Gö6983 but not BIMI provides consistent evidence on aPKC involvement (certainly not proof given the lack of absolute specificity for these kinases).
More recently aPKC selective ATP-competitive inhibitors have been described.101 The compound CRT0066854 is a thieno[2`,3-d] pyrimidine compound, which has been shown to display good kinase selectivity across a broad kinase panel (selectivity score S(80) at 1µM is ~0.02) with excellent selectivity for aPKCι/ζ within the PKC family. This aPKC inhibitor selectively blocks aPKCι substrate phosphorylation in cells and inhibits proliferation in 2D and 3D cultures, suppresses polarized morphogenesis and directional migration – effects all mimicking aPKC intervention through siRNA.102 The basis of specificity for CRT0066854 has been established through a high resolution inhibitor bound complex of the aPKCι kinase domain. Here it has been shown that the fused tricyclic scaffold forms hydrophobic contacts with the glycine loop, while the substituents at the 2 and 3 positions, respectively contribute hinge-binding and a combination of charge and hydrophobic interactions. Notably the CRT0066854 benzyl group forming part of the substituent in the 3 position displaces Phe543 of the PKCι “NFD motif”. As seen for the domain interaction dependent displacement of the NFD motif in the PKCβ structure (discussed above), the benzyl group confers an inactive conformation on the PKCι kinase domain contributing to its specificity. CRT0066854 as noted above inhibits growth in soft agar and suppresses migration, and can suppress also the transformed morphology associated with mutant Ras expression.49 This compound provides clear evidence of an ability to selectively target the aPKC isoform catalytic activity with consequences consistent with characterized behaviors of aPKC pathways. How such agents play out in the clinical setting remains to be seen.
Perspectives
Studies to date provide compelling evidence that PKCι is oncogenic in a variety of human cancers. Functionally, PKCι is required for multiple aspects of the transformed phenotype and appears to participate in the initiation, progression and metastatic stages of cancer. Furthermore, PKCι participates downstream of other key oncogenes that have proven difficult to target therapeutically such as oncogenic Kras. Acquisition of tumor-specific mutations in targeted molecules has become a recurrent theme and presents a major hurdle in achieving curative therapy in cancer patients. Interestingly, PKCι has been shown to promote chemoresistance in a number of cancer types and inhibition of PKCι sensitizes these tumor cells to chemotherapeutics. There is growing evidence that human tumors contain a population of cells that exhibit properties of tumor-initiating or cancer stem cells (CSCs) that are thought to be responsible for lung tumor initiation, maintenance, relapse and chemoresistance. These findings have led to the hypothesis that CSCs must be effectively targeted to elicit effective and long lasting therapeutic treatment of cancer patients. Genetic ablation of PKCι in a lung tumorigenesis model indicates that PKCι plays a critical role in transformation of lung CSCs. Despite the critical requirement for PKCι in tumor cell function, normal cells as well as tumor cells grown in adherent non-transformed growth conditions can better tolerate PKCι inhibition, thus providing a therapeutic window. For these reasons PKCι is an attractive therapeutic target for novel cancer treatment.
As discussed above, several approaches have been taken to modulate oncogenic PKCι function for cancer therapeutics. The use of non-selective PKC inhibitors in the clinic have given mixed results, and have not been very effective in treating tumors. This in part is due to the high homology between the PKC isozymes and the relative lack of specificity in previously designed PKC inhibitors. In this regard, PKCι and PKCζ are highly related, exhibiting 72% overall amino acid sequence homology and 86% identity within the kinase domain. While PKCι appears to consistently play a promotive role in transformation PKCζ is reported to have tumor suppressive functions in some contexts. Therefore, PKCι isozyme specific inhibitors may need to be utilized in order to circumvent the possible cross target effects on aPKCζ Future work is also required to identify distinct targets of PKCι signaling that can be developed as robust, sensitive markers of therapeutic response to PKCι inhibition in clinical trials.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Mellor H, Parker PJ. The extended protein kinase C superfamily. Biochem J. 1998;332(Pt 2):281–92. doi: 10.1042/bj3320281. Epub 1998/06/26. PubMed PMID: 9601053; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1219479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Takai Y, Kishimoto A, Iwasa Y, Kawahara Y, Mori T, Nishizuka Y. Calcium-dependent activation of a multifunctional protein kinase by membrane phospholipids. J Biol Chem. 1979;254(10):3692–5. Epub 1979/05/25. PubMed PMID: 438153. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ono Y, Fujii T, Ogita K, Kikkawa U, Igarashi K, Nishizuka Y. The structure, expression, and properties of additional members of the protein kinase C family. J Biol Chem. 1988;263(14):6927–32. Epub 1988/05/15. PubMed PMID: 2834397. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ono Y, Fujii T, Ogita K, Kikkawa U, Igarashi K, Nishizuka Y. Protein kinase C zeta subspecies from rat brain: its structure, expression, and properties. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86(9):3099–103. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.9.3099. PubMed PMID: 2470089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Selbie LA, Schmitz-Peiffer C, Sheng Y, Biden TJ. Molecular cloning and characterization of PKC iota, an atypical isoform of protein kinase C derived from insulin-secreting cells. J Biol Chem. 1993;268(32):24296–302. PubMed PMID: 8226978. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mukai H, Kitagawa M, Shibata H, Takanaga H, Mori K, Shimakawa M, Miyahara M, Hirao K, Ono Y. Activation of PKN, a novel 120-kDa protein kinase with leucine zipper-like sequences, by unsaturated fatty acids and by limited proteolysis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1994;204(1):348–56. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1994.2466. Epub 1994/10/14. doi: S0006-291X(84)72466-1 [pii] 10.1006/bbrc.1994.2466. PubMed PMID: 7945381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Palmer RH, Ridden J, Parker PJ. Cloning and expression patterns of two members of a novel protein-kinase-C-related kinase family. Eur J Biochem. 1995;227(1–2):344–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1995.tb20395.x. Epub 1995/01/15. PubMed PMID: 7851406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Reyland ME. Protein kinase C isoforms: Multi-functional regulators of cell life and death. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) 2009;14:2386–99. doi: 10.2741/3385. Epub 2009/03/11. doi: 3385 [pii]. PubMed PMID: 19273207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rosse C, Linch M, Kermorgant S, Cameron AJ, Boeckeler K, Parker PJ. PKC and the control of localized signal dynamics. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11(2):103–12. doi: 10.1038/nrm2847. Epub 2010/01/23. doi: 10.1038/nrm2847 nrm2847 [pii]. PubMed PMID: 20094051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fields AP, Murray NR. Protein kinase C isozymes as therapeutic targets for treatment of human cancers. Adv Enzyme Regul. 2008;48:166–78. doi: 10.1016/j.advenzreg.2007.11.014. Epub 2008/01/03. doi: 10.1016/j.advenzreg.2007.11.014 S0065-2571(07)00055-6 [pii]. PubMed PMID: 18167314; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2586109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Leitges M. Functional PKC in vivo analysis using deficient mouse models. Biochem Soc Trans. 2007;35(Pt 5):1018–20. doi: 10.1042/BST0351018. Epub 2007/10/25. doi: BST0351018 [pii] 10.1042/BST0351018. PubMed PMID: 17956267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Poole AW, Pula G, Hers I, Crosby D, Jones ML. PKC-interacting proteins: from function to pharmacology. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2004;25(10):528–35. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2004.08.006. Epub 2004/09/24. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2004.08.006 S0165-6147(04)00229-9 [pii]. PubMed PMID: 15380937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Fields AP, Murray NR, Gustafson WC. Characterization of the role of protein kinase C isozymes in colon carcinogenesis using transgenic mouse models. Methods Mol Biol. 2003;233:539–53. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-397-6:539. PubMed PMID: 12840533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Regala RP, Weems C, Jamieson L, Khoor A, Edell ES, Lohse CM, Fields AP. Atypical protein kinase C iota is an oncogene in human non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res. 2005;65(19):8905–11. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2372. Epub 2005/10/06. doi: 65/19/8905 [pii] 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2372. PubMed PMID: 16204062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Eder AM, Sui X, Rosen DG, Nolden LK, Cheng KW, Lahad JP, Kango-Singh M, Lu KH, Warneke CL, Atkinson EN, Bedrosian I, Keyomarsi K, Kuo WL, Gray JW, Yin JC, Liu J, Halder G, Mills GB. Atypical PKCiota contributes to poor prognosis through loss of apical-basal polarity and cyclin E overexpression in ovarian cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(35):12519–24. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0505641102. PubMed PMID: 16116079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Inoue M, Kishimoto A, Takai Y, Nishizuka Y. Studies on a cyclic nucleotide-independent protein kinase and its proenzyme in mammalian tissues. II. Proenzyme and its activation by calcium-dependent protease from rat brain. J Biol Chem. 1977;252(21):7610–6. Epub 1977/11/10. PubMed PMID: 199594. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cameron AJ, De Rycker M, Calleja V, Alcor D, Kjaer S, Kostelecky B, Saurin A, Faisal A, Laguerre M, Hemmings BA, McDonald N, Larijani B, Parker PJ. Protein kinases, from B to C. Biochem Soc Trans. 2007;35(Pt 5):1013–7. doi: 10.1042/BST0351013. Epub 2007/10/25. doi: BST0351013 [pii] 10.1042/BST0351013. PubMed PMID: 17956266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Newton AC. The ins and outs of protein kinase C. Methods Mol Biol. 2003;233:3–7. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-397-6:3. Epub 2003/07/04. doi: 1-59259-397-6-3 [pii] 10.1385/1-59259-397-6:3. PubMed PMID: 12840493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lopez-Garcia LA, Schulze JO, Frohner W, Zhang H, Suss E, Weber N, Navratil J, Amon S, Hindie V, Zeuzem S, Jorgensen TJ, Alzari PM, Neimanis S, Engel M, Biondi RM. Allosteric regulation of protein kinase PKCzeta by the N-terminal C1 domain and small compounds to the PIF-pocket. Chemistry & Biology. 2011;18(11):1463–73. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.08.010. Epub 2011/11/29. doi: S1074-5521(11)00319-X [pii] 10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.08.010. PubMed PMID: 22118680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Nalefski EA, Newton AC. Membrane binding kinetics of protein kinase C betaII mediated by the C2 domain. Biochemistry. 2001;40(44):13216–29. doi: 10.1021/bi010761u. Epub 2001/10/31. doi: bi010761u [pii]. PubMed PMID: 11683630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Leonard TA, Rozycki B, Saidi LF, Hummer G, Hurley JH. Crystal structure and allosteric activation of protein kinase C betaII. Cell. 2011;144(1):55–66. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.12.013. Epub 2011/01/11. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.12.013 S0092-8674(10)01431-5 [pii]. PubMed PMID: 21215369; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3104240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Takimura T, Kamata K, Fukasawa K, Ohsawa H, Komatani H, Yoshizumi T, Takahashi I, Kotani H, Iwasawa Y. Structures of the PKC-iota kinase domain in its ATP-bound and apo forms reveal defined structures of residues 533–551 in the C-terminal tail and their roles in ATP binding. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2010;66(Pt 5):577–83. doi: 10.1107/S0907444910005639. Epub 2010/05/07. doi: 10.1107/S0907444910005639 S0907444910005639 [pii]. PubMed PMID: 20445233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Stahelin RV, Kong KF, Raha S, Tian W, Melowic HR, Ward KE, Murray D, Altman A, Cho W. Protein kinase Ctheta C2 domain is a phosphotyrosine binding module that plays a key role in its activation. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(36):30518–28. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.391557. Epub 2012/07/13. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.391557 M112.391557 [pii]. PubMed PMID: 22787157; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3436300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Budas GR, Koyanagi T, Churchill EN, Mochly-Rosen D. Competitive inhibitors and allosteric activators of protein kinase C isoenzymes: a personal account and progress report on transferring academic discoveries to the clinic. Biochem Soc Trans. 2007;35(Pt 5):1021–6. doi: 10.1042/BST0351021. Epub 2007/10/25. doi: BST0351021 [pii] 10.1042/BST0351021. PubMed PMID: 17956268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Welch EJ, Jones BW, Scott JD. Networking with AKAPs: context-dependent regulation of anchored enzymes. Mol Interv. 2010;10(2):86–97. doi: 10.1124/mi.10.2.6. Epub 2010/04/07. doi: 10.1124/mi.10.2.6 10/2/86 [pii]. PubMed PMID: 20368369; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2895371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Akimoto K, Mizuno K, Osada S, Hirai S, Tanuma S, Suzuki K, Ohno S. A new member of the third class in the protein kinase C family, PKC lambda, expressed dominantly in an undifferentiated mouse embryonal carcinoma cell line and also in many tissues and cells. J Biol Chem. 1994;269(17):12677–83. Epub 1994/04/29. PubMed PMID: 7513693. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nakanishi H, Brewer KA, Exton JH. Activation of the zeta isozyme of protein kinase C by phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate. J Biol Chem. 1993;268(1):13–6. PubMed PMID: 8380153. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Moscat J, Diaz-Meco MT, Albert A, Campuzano S. Cell signaling and function organized by PB1 domain interactions. Molecular cell. 2006;23(5):631–40. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.08.002. PubMed PMID: 16949360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wooten MW, Seibenhener ML, Mamidipudi V, Diaz-Meco MT, Barker PA, Moscat J. The atypical protein kinase C-interacting protein p62 is a scaffold for NF-kappaB activation by nerve growth factor. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(11):7709–12. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C000869200. PubMed PMID: 11244088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.White WO, Seibenhener ML, Wooten MW. Phosphorylation of tyrosine 256 facilitates nuclear import of atypical protein kinase C. J Cell Biochem. 2002;85(1):42–53. Epub 2002/03/14. doi: 10.1002/jcb.10101 [pii]. PubMed PMID: 11891849. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tisdale EJ. Rab2 requires PKC iota/lambda to recruit beta-COP for vesicle formation. Traffic. 2000;1(9):702–12. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2000.010903.x. Epub 2001/02/24. doi: tra010903 [pii]. PubMed PMID: 11208158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Samuels IS, Seibenhener ML, Neidigh KB, Wooten MW. Nerve growth factor stimulates the interaction of ZIP/p62 with atypical protein kinase C and targets endosomal localization: evidence for regulation of nerve growth factor-induced differentiation. J Cell Biochem. 2001;82(3):452–66. doi: 10.1002/jcb.1177. Epub 2001/08/14. doi: 10.1002/jcb.1177 [pii]. PubMed PMID: 11500922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Macek B, Benda C, Jestel A, Maskos K, Mann M, Messerschmidt A. Phosphorylation of the human full-length protein kinase Ciota. J Proteome Res. 2008;7(7):2928–35. doi: 10.1021/pr800052z. Epub 2008/05/21. doi: 10.1021/pr800052z. PubMed PMID: 18489133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Justilien V, Fields AP. Ect2 links the PKCiota-Par6alpha complex to Rac1 activation and cellular transformation. Oncogene. 2009;28(41):3597–607. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.217. Epub 2009/07/21. doi: onc2009217 [pii] 10.1038/onc.2009.217. PubMed PMID: 19617897; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2762483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Frederick LA, Matthews JA, Jamieson L, Justilien V, Thompson EA, Radisky DC, Fields AP. Matrix metalloproteinase-10 is a critical effector of protein kinase Ciota-Par6alpha-mediated lung cancer. Oncogene. 2008;27(35):4841–53. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.119. Epub 2008/04/23. doi: onc2008119 [pii] 10.1038/onc.2008.119. PubMed PMID: 18427549; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2750877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Regala RP, Weems C, Jamieson L, Copland JA, Thompson EA, Fields AP. Atypical protein kinase Ciota plays a critical role in human lung cancer cell growth and tumorigenicity. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(35):31109–15. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M505402200. Epub 2005/07/05. doi: M505402200 [pii] 10.1074/jbc.M505402200. PubMed PMID: 15994303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Murray NR, Jamieson L, Yu W, Zhang J, Gokmen-Polar Y, Sier D, Anastasiadis P, Gatalica Z, Thompson EA, Fields AP. Protein kinase C{iota} is required for Ras transformation and colon carcinogenesis in vivo. J Cell Biol. 2004;164(6):797–802. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200311011. PubMed PMID: 15024028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Jamieson L, Carpenter L, Biden TJ, Fields AP. Protein kinase Ciota activity is necessary for Bcr-Abl-mediated resistance to drug-induced apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:3927–30. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.7.3927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Chen J, Zhang M. The Par3/Par6/aPKC complex and epithelial cell polarity. Exp Cell Res. 2013;319(10):1357–64. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2013.03.021. Epub 2013/03/29. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2013.03.021 S0014-4827(13)00129-8 [pii]. PubMed PMID: 23535009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hirano Y, Yoshinaga S, Takeya R, Suzuki NN, Horiuchi M, Kohjima M, Sumimoto H, Inagaki F. Structure of a cell polarity regulator, a complex between atypical PKC and Par6 PB1 domains. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(10):9653–61. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M409823200. Epub 2004/12/14. doi: M409823200 [pii] 10.1074/jbc.M409823200. PubMed PMID: 15590654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Huang L, Muthuswamy SK. Polarity protein alterations in carcinoma: a focus on emerging roles for polarity regulators. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2010;20(1):41–50. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2009.12.001. Epub 2010/01/23. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2009.12.001 S0959-437X(09)00198-1 [pii]. PubMed PMID: 20093003; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3015045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Martin TA, Mason MD, Jiang WG. Tight junctions in cancer metastasis. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) 2011;16:898–936. doi: 10.2741/3726. Epub 2011/01/05. doi: 3726 [pii]. PubMed PMID: 21196209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Du GS, Wang JM, Lu JX, Li Q, Ma CQ, Du JT, Zou SQ. Expression of P-aPKC-iota, E-cadherin, and beta-catenin related to invasion and metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(6):1578–86. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0423-7. Epub 2009/03/18. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0423-7. PubMed PMID: 19290490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kojima Y, Akimoto K, Nagashima Y, Ishiguro H, Shirai S, Chishima T, Ichikawa Y, Ishikawa T, Sasaki T, Kubota Y, Inayama Y, Aoki I, Ohno S, Shimada H. The overexpression and altered localization of the atypical protein kinase C lambda/iota in breast cancer correlates with the pathologic type of these tumors. Hum Pathol. 2008;39(6):824–31. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2007.11.001. Epub 2008/06/10. doi: S0046-8177(07)00603-X [pii] 10.1016/j.humpath.2007.11.001. PubMed PMID: 18538170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Erdogan E, Lamark T, Stallings-Mann M, Lee J, Pellecchia M, Thompson EA, Johansen T, Fields AP. Aurothiomalate inhibits transformed growth by targeting the PB1 domain of protein kinase Ciota. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(38):28450–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M606054200. Epub 2006/07/25. doi: M606054200 [pii] 10.1074/jbc.M606054200. PubMed PMID: 16861740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Aranda V, Haire T, Nolan ME, Calarco JP, Rosenberg AZ, Fawcett JP, Pawson T, Muthuswamy SK. Par6-aPKC uncouples ErbB2 induced disruption of polarized epithelial organization from proliferation control. Nature cell biology. 2006;8(11):1235–45. doi: 10.1038/ncb1485. PubMed PMID: 17060907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Justilien V, Jameison L, Der CJ, Rossman KL, Fields AP. Oncogenic activity of Ect2 is regulated through protein kinase C iota-mediated phosphorylation. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(10):8149–57. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.196113. Epub 2010/12/30. doi: M110.196113 [pii] 10.1074/jbc.M110.196113. PubMed PMID: 21189248; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3048701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Yang YL, Chu JY, Luo ML, Wu YP, Zhang Y, Feng YB, Shi ZZ, Xu X, Han YL, Cai Y, Dong JT, Zhan QM, Wu M, Wang MR. Amplification of PRKCI, located in 3q26, is associated with lymph node metastasis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2008;47(2):127–36. doi: 10.1002/gcc.20514. PubMed PMID: 17990328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Linch M, Sanz-Garcia M, Soriano E, Zhang Y, Riou P, Rosse C, Cameron A, Knowles P, Purkiss A, Kjaer S, McDonald NQ, Parker PJ. A Cancer-Associated Mutation in Atypical Protein Kinase Cı Occurs in a Substrate-Specific Recruitment Motif. Scince Signalling. 2013 doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2004068. In Press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Murray NR, Kalari KR, Fields AP. Protein kinase Ciota expression and oncogenic signaling mechanisms in cancer. J Cell Physiol. 2011;226(4):879–87. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22463. Epub 2010/10/15. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22463. PubMed PMID: 20945390; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3075823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kikuchi K, Soundararajan A, Zarzabal LA, Weems CR, Nelon LD, Hampton ST, Michalek JE, Rubin BP, Fields AP, Keller C. Protein kinase C iota as a therapeutic target in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. Oncogene. 2013;32(3):286–95. doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.46. Epub 2012/02/22. doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.46 onc201246 [pii]. PubMed PMID: 22349825; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3360112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Evans JD, Cornford PA, Dodson A, Neoptolemos JP, Foster CS. Expression patterns of protein kinase C isoenzymes are characteristically modulated in chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003;119(3):392–402. doi: 10.1309/bkpc9dx98r781b87. Epub 2003/03/21. PubMed PMID: 12645342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Scotti ML, Bamlet WR, Smyrk TC, Fields AP, Murray NR. Protein kinase Cı is required for pancreatic cancer cell transformed growth and tumorigenesis. Cancer Research. 2010;70(5):2064–74. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2684. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-09-2684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Gustafson WC, Ray S, Jamieson L, Thompson EA, Brasier AR, Fields AP. Bcr-Abl regulates protein kinase Ciota (PKCiota) transcription via an Elk1 site in the PKCiota promoter. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(10):9400–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M312840200. PubMed PMID: 14670960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Lee HW, Smith L, Pettit GR, Vinitsky A, Smith JB. Ubiquitination of protein kinase C-alpha and degradation by the proteasome. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(35):20973–6. Epub 1996/08/30. PubMed PMID: 8702857. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Liu SG, Wang BS, Jiang YY, Zhang TT, Shi ZZ, Yang Y, Yang YL, Wang XC, Lin DC, Zhang Y, Yang H, Cai Y, Zhan QM, Wang MR. Atypical protein kinase Ciota (PKCiota) promotes metastasis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by enhancing resistance to Anoikis via PKCiota-SKP2-AKT pathway. Mol Cancer Res. 2011;9(4):390–402. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-10-0359. Epub 2011/02/12. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-10-0359 1541-7786.MCR-10-0359 [pii]. PubMed PMID: 21310827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Takagawa R, Akimoto K, Ichikawa Y, Akiyama H, Kojima Y, Ishiguro H, Inayama Y, Aoki I, Kunisaki C, Endo I, Nagashima Y, Ohno S. High expression of atypical protein kinase C lambda/iota in gastric cancer as a prognostic factor for recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(1):81–8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0708-x. Epub 2009/09/24. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0708-x. PubMed PMID: 19774416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Fields AP, Frederick LA, Regala RP. Targeting the oncogenic protein kinase Ciota signalling pathway for the treatment of cancer. Biochem Soc Trans. 2007;35(Pt 5):996–1000. doi: 10.1042/BST0350996. PubMed PMID: 17956262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Zhang L, Huang J, Yang N, Liang S, Barchetti A, Giannakakis A, Cadungog MG, O'Brien-Jenkins A, Massobrio M, Roby KF, Katsaros D, Gimotty P, Butzow R, Weber BL, Coukos G. Integrative genomic analysis of protein kinase C (PKC) family identifies PKCiota as a biomarker and potential oncogene in ovarian carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2006;66(9):4627–35. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-4527. PubMed PMID: 16651413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Regala RP, Davis RK, Kunz A, Khoor A, Leitges M, Fields AP. Atypical protein kinase C{iota} is required for bronchioalveolar stem cell expansion and lung tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 2009;69(19):7603–11. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2066. Epub 2009/09/10. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2066 0008-5472.CAN-09-2066 [pii]. PubMed PMID: 19738040; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2756303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Takayama T, Katsuki S, Takahashi Y, Ohi M, Nojiri S, Sakamaki S, Kato J, Kogawa K, Miyake H, Niitsu Y. Aberrant crypt foci of the colon as precursors of adenoma and cancer. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(18):1277–84. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199810293391803. PubMed PMID: 9791143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Murray NR, Jamieson L, Yu W, Zhang J, Gokmen-Polar Y, Sier D, Anastasiadis P, Gatalica Z, Thompson EA, Fields AP. Protein kinase Ciota is required for Ras transformation and colon carcinogenesis in vivo. J Cell Biol. 2004;164(6):797–802. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200311011. PubMed PMID: 15024028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kim CF, Jackson EL, Woolfenden AE, Lawrence S, Babar I, Vogel S, Crowley D, Bronson RT, Jacks T. Identification of bronchioalveolar stem cells in normal lung and lung cancer. Cell. 2005;121(6):823–35. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.03.032. PubMed PMID: 15960971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Jin Z, Xin M, Deng X. Survival function of protein kinase C{iota} as a novel nitrosamine 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone-activated bad kinase. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(16):16045–52. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M413488200. Epub 2005/02/12. doi: M413488200 [pii] 10.1074/jbc.M413488200. PubMed PMID: 15705582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Kobayashi T, Inoue T, Shimizu Y, Terada N, Maeno A, Kajita Y, Yamasaki T, Kamba T, Toda Y, Mikami Y, Yamada T, Kamoto T, Ogawa O, Nakamura E. Activation of Rac1 is closely related to androgen-independent cell proliferation of prostate cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo. Mol Endocrinol. 2010;24(4):722–34. doi: 10.1210/me.2009-0326. Epub 2010/03/06. doi: 10.1210/me.2009-0326 me.2009-0326 [pii]. PubMed PMID: 20203103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Rodriguez EM, Dunham EE, Martin GS. Atypical protein kinase C activity is required for extracellular matrix degradation and invasion by Src-transformed cells. J Cell Physiol. 2009;221(1):171–82. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21841. Epub 2009/06/06. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21841. PubMed PMID: 19492416; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2782718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Standaert ML, Bandyopadhyay G, Kanoh Y, Sajan MP, Farese RV. Insulin and PIP3 activate PKC-zeta by mechanisms that are both dependent and independent of phosphorylation of activation loop (T410) and autophosphorylation (T560) sites. Biochemistry. 2001;40(1):249–55. doi: 10.1021/bi0018234. Epub 2001/01/05. doi: bi0018234 [pii]. PubMed PMID: 11141077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Pillai P, Desai S, Patel R, Sajan M, Farese R, Ostrov D, Acevedo-Duncan M. A novel PKC-iota inhibitor abrogates cell proliferation and induces apoptosis in neuroblastoma. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2011;43(5):784–94. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2011.02.002. Epub 2011/02/15. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2011.02.002 S1357-2725(11)00042-2 [pii]. PubMed PMID: 21315177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Shultz JC, Vu N, Shultz MD, Mba MU, Shapiro BA, Chalfant CE. The Proto-oncogene PKCiota regulates the alternative splicing of Bcl-x pre-mRNA. Mol Cancer Res. 2012;10(5):660–9. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-11-0363. Epub 2012/04/24. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-11-0363 1541-7786.MCR-11-0363 [pii]. PubMed PMID: 22522453; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3356487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Murray NR, Fields AP. Atypical protein kinase C iota protects human leukemia cells against drug-induced apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(44):27521–4. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.44.27521. PubMed PMID: 9346882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Win HY, Acevedo-Duncan M. Atypical protein kinase C phosphorylates IKKαβ in transformed non-malignant and malignant prostate cell survival. Cancer Letters. 2008;270(2):302–11. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.05.023. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.05.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Lu Y, Jamieson L, Brasier AR, Fields AP. NF-kappaB/RelA transactivation is required for atypical protein kinase C iota-mediated cell survival. Oncogene. 2001;20(35):4777–92. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Baldwin RM, Garratt-Lalonde M, Parolin DA, Krzyzanowski PM, Andrade MA, Lorimer IA. Protection of glioblastoma cells from cisplatin cytotoxicity via protein kinase Ciota-mediated attenuation of p38 MAP kinase signaling. Oncogene. 2006;25(20):2909–19. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209312. Epub 2005/12/07. doi: 1209312 [pii] 10.1038/sj.onc.1209312. PubMed PMID: 16331246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Wang X, Nie J, Zhou Q, Liu W, Zhu F, Chen W, Mao H, Luo N, Dong X, Yu X. Downregulation of Par-3 expression and disruption of Par complex integrity by TGF-beta during the process of epithelial to mesenchymal transition in rat proximal epithelial cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1782(1):51–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2007.11.002. Epub 2007/12/12. doi: S0925-4439(07)00198-6 [pii] 10.1016/j.bbadis.2007.11.002. PubMed PMID: 18070611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.McCaffrey LM, Montalbano J, Mihai C, Macara IG. Loss of the Par3 polarity protein promotes breast tumorigenesis and metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2012;22(5):601–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.10.003. Epub 2012/11/17. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.10.003 S1535-6108(12)00437-0 [pii]. PubMed PMID: 23153534; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3500525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Gunaratne A, Thai BL, Di Guglielmo GM. Atypical protein kinase C phosphorylates Par6 and facilitates transforming growth factor beta-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Mol Cell Biol. 2013;33(5):874–86. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00837-12. Epub 2012/12/20. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00837-12 MCB.00837-12 [pii]. PubMed PMID: 23249950; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3623079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Baldwin RM, Parolin DAE, Lorimer IAJ. Regulation of glioblastoma cell invasion by PKC[iota] and RhoB. Oncogene. 2008;27(25):3587–95. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1211027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Regala RP, Justilien V, Walsh MP, Weems C, Khoor A, Murray NR, Fields AP. Matrix metalloproteinase-10 promotes Kras-mediated bronchio-alveolar stem cell expansion and lung cancer formation. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(10):e26439. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026439. Epub 2011/10/25. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026439 PONE-D-11-14143 [pii]. PubMed PMID: 22022614; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3195727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Erdogan E, Klee EW, Thompson EA, Fields AP. Meta-analysis of oncogenic protein kinase Cı signaling in lung adenocarcinoma. Clinical Cancer Research. 2009;15(5):1527–33. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2459. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-08-2459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Rodon J, Dienstmann R, Serra V, Tabernero J. Development of PI3K inhibitors: lessons learned from early clinical trials. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013;10(3):143–53. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.10. Epub 2013/02/13. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.10 nrclinonc.2013.10 [pii]. PubMed PMID: 23400000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Davies SP, Reddy H, Caivano M, Cohen P. Specificity and mechanism of action of some commonly used protein kinase inhibitors. Biochem J. 2000;351(Pt 1):95–105. doi: 10.1042/0264-6021:3510095. Epub 2000/09/22. PubMed PMID: 10998351; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1221339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Najafov A, Sommer EM, Axten JM, Deyoung MP, Alessi DR. Characterization of GSK2334470, a novel and highly specific inhibitor of PDK1. Biochem J. 2011;433(2):357–69. doi: 10.1042/BJ20101732. Epub 2010/11/23. doi: 10.1042/BJ20101732 BJ20101732 [pii]. PubMed PMID: 21087210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Balendran A, Casamayor A, Deak M, Paterson A, Gaffney P, Currie R, Downes CP, Alessi DR. PDK1 acquires PDK2 activity in the presence of a synthetic peptide derived from the carboxyl terminus of PRK2. Curr Biol. 1999;9(8):393–404. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(99)80186-9. Epub 1999/05/05. doi: S0960982299801869 [pii]. PubMed PMID: 10226025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Frohner W, Lopez-Garcia LA, Neimanis S, Weber N, Navratil J, Maurer F, Stroba A, Zhang H, Biondi RM, Engel M. 4-benzimidazolyl-3-phenylbutanoic acids as novel PIF-pocket-targeting allosteric inhibitors of protein kinase PKCzeta. J Med Chem. 2011;54(19):6714–23. doi: 10.1021/jm2005892. Epub 2011/08/26. doi: 10.1021/jm2005892. PubMed PMID: 21863889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Heitman J, Movva NR, Hall MN. Targets for cell cycle arrest by the immunosuppressant rapamycin in yeast. Science. 1991;253(5022):905–9. doi: 10.1126/science.1715094. Epub 1991/08/23. PubMed PMID: 1715094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Cameron AJ, Linch MD, Saurin AT, Escribano C, Parker PJ. mTORC2 targets AGC kinases through Sin1-dependent recruitment. Biochem J. 2011;439(2):287–97. doi: 10.1042/BJ20110678. Epub 2011/08/03. doi: 10.1042/BJ20110678 BJ20110678 [pii]. PubMed PMID: 21806543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Wander SA, Hennessy BT, Slingerland JM. Next-generation mTOR inhibitors in clinical oncology: how pathway complexity informs therapeutic strategy. J Clin Invest. 2011;121(4):1231–41. doi: 10.1172/JCI44145. Epub 2011/04/15. doi: 10.1172/JCI44145 44145 [pii]. PubMed PMID: 21490404; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3069769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Huang HC, Huang CY, Lin-Shiau SY, Lin JK. Ursolic acid inhibits IL-1β or TNF-α-induced C6 glioma invasion through suppressing the association ZIP/p62 with PKC-ζ and downregulating the MMP-9 expression. Molecular Carcinogenesis. 2009;48(6):517–31. doi: 10.1002/mc.20490. doi: 10.1002/mc.20490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Ma CM, Cai SQ, Cui JR, Wang RQ, Tu PF, Hattori M, Daneshtalab M. The cytotoxic activity of ursolic acid derivatives. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2005;40(6):582–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2005.01.001. Epub 2005/06/01. doi: S0223-5234(05)00002-4 [pii] 10.1016/j.ejmech.2005.01.001. PubMed PMID: 15922841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Shanmugam MK, Dai X, Kumar AP, Tan BK, Sethi G, Bishayee A. Ursolic acid in cancer prevention and treatment: molecular targets, pharmacokinetics and clinical studies. Biochem Pharmacol. 2013;85(11):1579–87. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2013.03.006. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2013.03.006. PubMed PMID: 23499879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Stallings-Mann M, Jamieson L, Regala RP, Weems C, Murray NR, Fields AP. A novel small-molecule inhibitor of protein kinase Ciota blocks transformed growth of non-small-cell lung cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2006;66(3):1767–74. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3405. PubMed PMID: 16452237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Messori L, Marcon G. Gold complexes in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Met Ions Biol Syst. 2004;41:279–304. Epub 2004/06/23. PubMed PMID: 15206120. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Regala RP, Thompson EA, Fields AP. Atypical protein kinase Cι expression and aurothiomalate sensitivity in human lung cancer cells. Cancer Research. 2008;68(14):5888–95. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0438. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-0438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Trani M, Sorrentino A, Busch C, Landstrom M. Pro-apoptotic effect of aurothiomalate in prostate cancer cells. Cell Cycle. 2009;8(2):306–13. doi: 10.4161/cc.8.2.7596. Epub 2009/01/24. doi: 7596 [pii]. PubMed PMID: 19164922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Mansfield AS, Fields AP, Jatoi A, Qi Y, Adjei AA, Erlichman C, Molina JR. Phase I dose escalation study of the PKCiota inhibitor aurothiomalate for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, ovarian cancer, and pancreatic cancer. Anticancer Drugs. 2013 doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000009. Epub 2013/08/22. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000009. PubMed PMID: 23962904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Eichholtz T, de Bont DB, de Widt J, Liskamp RM, Ploegh HL. A myristoylated pseudosubstrate peptide, a novel protein kinase C inhibitor. J Biol Chem. 1993;268(3):1982–6. Epub 1993/01/25. PubMed PMID: 8420972. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Schaap D, Parker PJ, Bristol A, Kriz R, Knopf J. Unique substrate specificity and regulatory properties of PKC-epsilon: a rationale for diversity. FEBS Lett. 1989;243(2):351–7. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(89)80160-7. Epub 1989/01/30. doi: 0014-5793(89)80160-7 [pii]. PubMed PMID: 2917656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Martiny-Baron G, Kazanietz MG, Mischak H, Blumberg PM, Kochs G, Hug H, Marme D, Schachtele C. Selective inhibition of protein kinase C isozymes by the indolocarbazole Go 6976. J Biol Chem. 1993;268(13):9194–7. Epub 1993/05/05. PubMed PMID: 8486620. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Toullec D, Pianetti P, Coste H, Bellevergue P, Grand-Perret T, Ajakane M, Baudet V, Boissin P, Boursier E, Loriolle F, et al. The bisindolylmaleimide GF 109203X is a potent and selective inhibitor of protein kinase C. J Biol Chem. 1991;266(24):15771–81. Epub 1991/08/25. PubMed PMID: 1874734. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Gschwendt M, Dieterich S, Rennecke J, Kittstein W, Mueller HJ, Johannes FJ. Inhibition of protein kinase C mu by various inhibitors. Differentiation from protein kinase c isoenzymes. FEBS Lett. 1996;392(2):77–80. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(96)00785-5. PubMed PMID: 8772178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Kjaer S, Linch M, Purkiss A, Kostelecky B, Knowles PP, Rosse C, Riou P, Soudy C, Kaye S, Patel B, Soriano E, Murray-Rust J, Barton C, Dillon C, Roffey J, Parker PJ, McDonald NQ. Adenosine-binding motif mimicry and cellular effects of a thieno[2,3-d]pyrimidine-based chemical inhibitor of atypical protein kinase C isoenzymes. Biochem J. 2013;451(2):329–42. doi: 10.1042/BJ20121871. doi: 10.1042/BJ20121871. PubMed PMID: 23418854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Linch M, Sanz-Garcia M, Rosse C, Riou P, Peel N, Madsen C, Sahai E, Downward J, Khwaja A, Dillon C, Roffey J, Cameron A, Parker PJ. Regulation of polarized morphogenesis by protein kinase C iota in oncogenic epithelial spheroids. Carcinogenesis. 2013 doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgt313. Epub 2013/09/28. doi: bgt313 [pii] 10.1093/carcin/bgt313. PubMed PMID: 24072773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


