Skip to main content
Biology of Sport logoLink to Biology of Sport
. 2013 Apr 11;30(2):91–95. doi: 10.5604/20831862.1044223

JUMP LANDING CHARACTERISTICS IN ELITE SOCCER PLAYERS WITH CEREBRAL PALSY

J Cámara 1,, I Grande 2, G Mejuto 1, A Los Arcos 3, J Yanci 1
PMCID: PMC3944576  PMID: 24744473

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to analyse the parameters that characterize the vertical ground reaction force during the landing phase of a jump, and to determine the relationship among these parameters in elite soccer players with cerebral palsy (CP). Thirteen male members of the Spanish national soccer team for people with CP (mean age: 27.1 ± 4.7 years) volunteered for the study. Each participant performed three counter movement jumps. The characteristics of the first peak of the vertical ground reaction force during the landing phase of a jump, which corresponds to the forefoot contact with the ground, were similar to the results obtained in previous studies. However, a higher magnitude of rearfoot contact with the ground (F2) was observed in participants with CP than in participants without CP. Furthermore, a significant correlation between F2 magnitude and the elapsed time until its production (T2) was not observed (r = -0.474 for p = 0.102). This result implies that a landing technique based on a delay in the production of F2 might not be effective to reduce its magnitude, contrary to what has been observed in participants without CP. The absence of a significant correlation between these two parameters in the present study, and the high magnitude of F2, suggest that elite soccer players with CP should use footwear with proper cushioning characteristics.

Keywords: counter movement jump, injury, vertical ground reaction force

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies have shown that soccer players are exposed to injuries [51], particularly injuries of the lower limb [15, 19, 24]. The injury rate in soccer is estimated to be approximately 10-35 injuries per 1,000 playing hours [13], which is higher than in other sports, such as in handball, basketball, rugby, cricket, badminton, fencing, cycling, judo, boxing, subaqua, and swimming [5052]. The factors associated with injury production in soccer players have received wide attention [20, 23, 38, 49]. High vertical ground reaction forces (VGRFs) have been identified as the main causes of soccer injury [1, 3, 21], due to the stress that they place on the musculoskeletal system [39].

During the landing phase of a jump, the impact of the foot with the ground is characterized by two distinct peaks in the VGRF [3]. The first peak (F1) corresponds to the contact of the forefoot with the ground, and the second peak (F2) corresponds to the contact of the rearfoot with the ground [3, 28, 36, 47]. Given that high magnitudes of F2 have been associated with the production of injuries [3, 12, 30], a reduction of their magnitude would decrease the injury rate [12, 18]. Since the time elapsed from the first contact of the foot with the ground to the production of F2 (T2) is inversely correlated with the magnitude of F2 [41], an increase in T2 would decrease the impact of the rearfoot with the ground. A landing technique based on the synchronized and coordinated flexion of the ankles, knees, and hips during the landing phase has been shown to increase T2 [3, 40], thereby reducing the impact of the foot with the ground.

Considering that individuals with cerebral palsy (CP) are very susceptible to injury [16, 35, 37], soccer players with CP may be a potential target population that could benefit from this landing technique. Persons with CP have a persistent disorder in their locomotion pattern and orthostatic position, mainly caused by a non-progressive brain lesion, injury, or malformation that occurs prenatally or in the first two years of life [6]. Furthermore, CP is characterized by a heterogeneous group of neuromotor conditions involving muscle weakness, morpho-skeletal disorders, and articular instability [8, 22, 34], which may influence the VGRF characteristics during the landing phase.

Therefore, this study aims to analyse the parameters that characterize the VGRF during the landing phase of a jump in elite soccer players with CP, and to determine the relationships among these parameters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirteen male members of the Spanish national soccer team for people with CP (mean age ± SD, 27.1 ± 4.7 years; height, 1.74 ± 0.04 m; body mass, 66.4 ± 4.7 kg; body mass index, 22.17 ± 1.85 kg · m−2) volunteered for this study. All of the study subjects had participated in at least three international events organized by the International Paralympic Committee or by the Cerebral Palsy International Sport and Recreation Association (CP-ISRA). All subjects had been assigned CP-ISRA and Spanish Sport Federation classifications for people with CP. Both requirements are essential to participate in sport events in the CP category. Prior to involvement in the investigation, all study participants provided written informed consent, as outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Spanish Sports Federation for people with CP.

Procedures

Study participants were required to perform three countermovement jumps (CMJs) interspersed with 45-s recovery periods [26]. All participants refrained from intense exercise 72 h prior to their involvement in the study. Two days before the testing sessions, participants underwent 45 min of technical training to ensure consistent performance during the CMJs. Hands remained at the hips during the entire jump. Minimal flexion of the trunk during take-off was permitted [25], and maximal flexion of the knees during the take-off phase of the CMJ was required to be approximately 90° [2]. On the testing day, participants performed a standardized warm-up consisting of 5-s self-paced low-intensity running, skipping exercises, and two acceleration drills. To avoid any influence of the instructor's feedback on VGRF, no information about landing performance was given to the study participants [31]. The following variables were registered: a) F1 and F2 magnitudes, b) the time from the first contact of the foot with the ground to the production of F1 (T1), c) the time from the second contact of the foot with the ground to the production of F2 (T2), and c) the time to stabilization (TTS).

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were calculated for all experimental data. The results are presented as mean ± standard deviation from the mean (SD). All the variables were normal and satisfied the equality of variances according to the Shapiro-Wilk and Levene tests respectively. The VGRF was collected at 500 Hz using a force platform (Kistler, Quattro Jump, Switzerland). The magnitudes of F1 and F2 were identified from the VGRF and normalized by the subjects’ body weight [33]. The time from the T1 and T2 were also registered. The TTS was established as the time when the VGRF reached and stayed within 5% of each subject's body weight [5, 29]. Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients (r) were calculated to determine the relationships among the parameters obtained from the VGRF. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Data analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, U.S.A.).

RESULTS

All study participants utilized a forefoot-rearfoot landing strategy that demonstrated two distinctive peaks (F1 and F2) on the time-history curve of the VGRF. Group mean, standard deviation (SD), maximum (Max), and minimum (Min) VGRF parameters are presented in Table 1. Flight time (FT) is also presented.

TABLE 1.

DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS OF THE VARIABLES OF THE STUDY

Mean ± SD Min Max
FT (s) 0.455 ± 0.041 0.401 0.534
F1 (BW) 1.921 ± 1.392 0.982 4.259
F2 (BW) 6.462 ± 1.685 2.977 8.692
T1 (s) 0.021 ± 0.112 0.012 0.053
T2 (s) 0.043 ± 0.183 0.016 0.068
TTS (s) 0.461 ± 0.144 0.334 0.902

Legend: SD: standard deviation, Min: minimum value, Max: maximum value, FT: flight time, F1: magnitude of the first peak, F2: magnitude of the second peak, T1: time to production of F1, T2: time to production of F2, TTS: time to stabilization.

Table 2 shows the Pearson correlation coefficients and two-tailed statistical significance levels. The threshold values for Pearson product-moment [44] were used to interpret the results: low (r ≤ 0.3), moderate (0.3 < r ≤ 0.7), and high (r > 0.7). There were no significant correlations between any variables for p < 0.05.

TABLE 2.

PEARSON CORRELATION COEFFICIENT BETWEEN THE VARIABLES OF THE STUDY

FT F1 F2 T1 T2 TTS
FT Pearson correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
1 -0.124
0.687
0.544
0.055
-0.271
0.370
-0.442
0.130
0.438
0.134

F1 Pearson correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
1 -0.206
0.499
0.303
0.314
0.464
0.110
-0.399
0.177

F2 Pearson correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
1 -0.172
0.573
-0.474
0.102
-0.051
0.869

T1 Pearson correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
1 0.548
0.053
-0.237
0.436

T2 Pearson correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
1 -0.361
0.225

TTS Pearson correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
1

Legend: FT: flight time, F1: magnitude of the first peak, F2: magnitude of the second peak, T1: time to production of F1, T2: time to production of F2, TTS: time to stabilization.

DISCUSSION

The main novelty of this study is to describe and analyse the VGRF during the landing phase of a jump in elite soccer players with CP. High VGRF magnitudes have been related to injury production in different sports [1, 3, 21], and specifically in soccer [13]. However, until now, no study has assessed the VGRF during the landing phase of a jump in elite soccer players with CP.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1

REPRESENTATIVE GROUND REACTION FORCE (VGRF) CURVE. F1 INDICATES MAGNITUDE OF THE FIRST PEAK; F2, MAGNITUDE OF THE SECOND PEAK; T1, TIME TO PRODUCTION OF F1; T2, TIME TO PRODUCTION OF F2; TTS, TIME TO STABILIZATION

The F1 magnitude (Table 1) observed in the present study was similar to previous observations in recreational sports participants without CP (respectively, 1.92 BW vs. 1.51 [10], 1.16 [9], and 1.82 BW [46]). In contrast, F2 magnitude appeared to be higher in the present study than has been previously observed in recreational sports participants without CP (respectively, 6.46 BW vs. 3.67 [10], 2.52 [46], 3.21 [53], 4.29 [48], 3.1 [31], 3.93 [32], and 4.6 BW [30]). Given that landing height has been demonstrated to increase the impact of the foot with the ground [53], we considered that the higher magnitude of F2 observed in our study might be due to higher landing height. However, the landing height in the present study was lower than landing heights documented in previous studies (respectively, 25 cm vs. 30 [3032, 48], 60 [10, 46], and 62 cm [53]). The persistent plantar-flexed foot in participants with CP may have created a longer moment arm at the foot in relation to the ankle [17], thereby increasing the magnitude of F2. Furthermore, the muscle activity deficit that occurs shortly before the touch down as a strategy to prepare the muscles to absorb the impact [45] may also have contributed to the higher F2 magnitude observed in participants with CP.

However, in the present study, the time elapsed until F1 and F2 was consistent with the results obtained in similar studies performed with individuals without CP (F1: 21 ms (present study) vs. 16 [47] and 9.15 ms [9]; F2: 43 ms (present study) vs. 36 ms [9]). TTS magnitude (Table 1) was also similar to findings from an earlier study (0.435 ± 0.083 ms) [4]. As TTS is a measure of neuromuscular control obtained by measuring the dynamic stability during the landing phase of a jump [42, 43], these results suggest that in spite of the postural instability observed in study subjects with CP [7], postural sway in the vertical direction might not be affected in these individuals. Although a higher TTS was observed in basketball players in a previous study (0.65 ± 0.15 ms) [14], the differences observed in our study may be partly due to arm movement during the landing phase; basketball players had to bring their arms down to a ninety-degree angle and lock them in place upon landing, while in our study participants kept their hands at their hips.

No significant correlations were observed among the VGRF parameters (Table 2). In contrast, the significant correlation previously observed between F2 and T2 in semi-professional soccer players without CP (r = -0.406) [41] and in physically active individuals without CP (r = -0.709) [27] supports the idea of a landing technique based on the synchronized coordination of ankle, knee, and hip flexion in order to delay F2 production, and thereby minimize the impact of the heels with the ground [3]. Nevertheless, the absence of a significant correlation in the present study between F2 and T2 (Table 2) implies that this landing technique might not be effective to reduce the impact of the foot with the ground in elite soccer players with CP. Therefore, we propose that soccer players with CP use footwear with proper cushioning characteristics in order to diminish the impact of the heel with the ground.

No significant correlation has been demonstrated between F1 and F2. These results are in agreement with previous observations in individuals without CP (r = -0.027 [41] and r = 0.233 [27]). These results were expected because F1 is considered a passive component of the landing, and is not influenced by muscular activity [11].

The absence of a significant correlation between TTS and the variables characterizing the contact of the forefoot and rearfoot with the ground (Table 2) suggests that the vertical dynamic postural stability during jump landing might not be affected by the impact of the foot with the ground. Nevertheless, additional research is needed to analyse the dynamic postural stability in the antero-posterior and medio-lateral directions in elite soccer players with CP.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the results of the present study, the characteristics of VGRF that define the impact of the forefoot with the ground are similar between individuals with and without CP. In contrast, elite CP soccer players exhibited higher values of the impact of the rearfoot with the ground. These results suggest a reduced cushioning capacity during the landing phase in elite soccer players with CP.

No significant relationships were observed among the parameters that characterize the VGRF. The absence of a significant correlation between the magnitude of the impact of the rearfoot with the ground and the time elapsed until its production implies that a landing technique based on a delay in the production of this impact might not be effective to reduce the impact of the rearfoot with the ground. This study highlights the utility of footwear with proper cushioning characteristics for elite soccer players with CP.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Boden B.P, Dean G.S, Feagin J.A, Jr, Garrett W.E., Jr Mechanisms of anterior cruciate ligament injury. Orthopedics. 2000;23:573–578. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-20000601-15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bosco C, Luhtanen P, Komi P.V. A simple method for measurement of mechanical power in jumping. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 1983;50:273–82. doi: 10.1007/BF00422166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bressel E, Cronin J. The Landing Phase of a Jump: Strategies to Minimize Injuries. JOPERD. 2005;76:31–47. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cámara J, Díaz F, Anza M.S, Mejuto G, Puente A, Iturriaga G, Fernández J.R. The effect of patellar taping on some landing characteristics during counter movement jumps in healthy subjects. J. Sports Sci. Med. 2011;10:707–11. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Colby S.M, Hintermeister R.A, Torry M.R, Steadman J.R. Lower limb stability with ACL impairment. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 1999;29:444–51. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1999.29.8.444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cooley W.C. Providing a primary care medical home for children and youth with cerebral palsy. Pediatrics. 2004;114:1106–13. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Damiano D.L, Kelly L.E, Vaughn C.L. Effects of quadriceps femoris muscle strengthening on crouch gait in children with spastic diplegia. Phys. Ther. 1995;75:658–67. doi: 10.1093/ptj/75.8.658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Damiano D.L, Martellotta T.L, Sullivan D.J, Granata K.P, Abel M.F. Muscle force production and functional performance in spastic cerebral palsy: relationship of cocontraction. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2000;81:895–900. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2000.5579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Decker M.J, Torry M.R, Noonan T.J, Riviere A, Sterett W.I. Landing adaptations after ACL reconstruction. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2002;34:1408–13. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200209000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Decker M.J, Torry M.R, Wyland D.J, Sterett W.I, Richard Steadman J. Gender differences in lower extremity kinematics, kinetics and energy absorption during landing. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon) 2003;18:662–9. doi: 10.1016/s0268-0033(03)00090-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Denoth J. The dynamic behavior of three link model of the human body during impact with the ground. In: Winter D, Norman R, Wells R, Hayes K, Patla A, editors. Biomechanics IX-B. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1985. pp. 102–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dufek J.S, Bates B.T. Biomechanical factors associated with injury during landing in jump sports. Sports Med. 1991;12:326–37. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199112050-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dvorak J, Junge A. Football injuries and physical symptoms. A review of the literature. Am. J. Sports Med. 2000;28:S3–9. doi: 10.1177/28.suppl_5.s-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ebben W.P, Petushek E.J, Nelp A.S, editors. The effect of whole body vibration on the dynamic stability of women basketball players; 28 International Conference on Biomechanics in Sports; Michigan, USA: 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Elias S.R. 10-year trend in USA Cup soccer injuries: 1988-1997. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2001;33:359–67. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200103000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ferrara M.S, Peterson C.L. Injuries to athletes with disabilities: identifying injury patterns. Sports Med. 2000;30:137–43. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200030020-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fonseca S.T, Holt K.G, Fetters L, Saltzman E. Dynamic resources used in ambulation by children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy: relationship to kinematics, energetics, and asymmetries. Phys. Ther. 2004;84:344–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gerberich S.G, Luhman S, Finke C, Priest J.D, Beard B.J. Analysis of severe injuries associated with volleyball activities. Physician and Sports Medicine. 1987;15:75–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hawkins R.D, Fuller C.W. A prospective epidemiological study of injuries in four English professional football clubs. Br. J. Sports Med. 1999;33:196–203. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.33.3.196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hawkins R.D, Hulse M.A, Wilkinson C, Hodson A, Gibson M. The association football medical research programme: an audit of injuries in professional football. Br. J. Sports Med. 2001;35:43–7. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.35.1.43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hewett T.E, Myer G.D, Ford K.R, Heidt R.S, Jr, Colosimo A.J, McLean S.G, van den Bogert A.J, Paterno M.V, Succop P. Biomechanical measures of neuromuscular control and valgus loading of the knee predict anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in female athletes: a prospective study. Am. J. Sports Med. 2005;33:492–501. doi: 10.1177/0363546504269591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ikeda A.J, Abel M.F, Granata K.P, Damiano D.L. Quantification of cocontraction in spastic cerebral palsy. Electromyogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1998;38:497–504. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Junge A, Dvorak J, Graf-Baumann T, Peterson L. Football injuries during FIFA tournaments and the Olympic Games, 1998-2001: development and implementation of an injury-reporting system. Am. J. Sports Med. 2004;32:80S–9S. doi: 10.1177/0363546503261245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kolodziej M.A, Koblitz S, Nimsky C, Hellwig D. Mechanisms and consequences of head injuries in soccer: a study of 451 patients. Neurosurg. Focus. 2011;31:E1. doi: 10.3171/2011.10.FOCUS11184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Komi P.V, Bosco C. Utilization of stored elastic energy in leg extensor muscles by men and women. Med. Sci. Sports. 1978;10:261–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Krol H, Mynarski W. Effect of increased load on vertical jump mechanical characteristics in acrobats. Acta Bioeng. Biomech. 2010;12:33–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Liebermann D.G. Effects of visual guidance on the reduction of impacts during landings. Ergonomics. 1991;34:1399–406. doi: 10.1080/00140139108964880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.McClay I.S, Robinson J.R, Andriacchi T.P, Frederic E.C, Gross T, Marin P, Valiant G, Williams K.R, Cavanagh P.R. A profile if ground reaction forces in professional basketball. J. Appl. Biomech. 1994:222–36. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.McKinley P, Pedotti A. Motor strategies in landing from a jump: the role of skill in task execution. Exp. Brain Res. 1992;90:427–40. doi: 10.1007/BF00227257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.McNair P.J, Marshall R.N. Landing characteristics in subjects with normal and anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee joints. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 1994;75:584–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.McNair P.J, Prapavessis H, Callender K. Decreasing landing forces: effect of instruction. Br. J. Sports Med. 2000;34:293–6. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.34.4.293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.McNitt-Gray J.L. Kinematics and impulse characteristics of drop landing from three heights. Int. J. Sport Biomech. 1991;7:201–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Miller D. Ground reaction forces in distang running. In: Cavanagh P, editor. Biomechanics of distance running. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1990. pp. 203–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Moreau N.G, Li L, Geaghan J.P, Damiano D.L. Contributors to fatigue resistance of the hamstrings and quadriceps in cerebral palsy. Clin. Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2009;24:355–60. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.01.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Nyland J, Snouse S.L, Anderson M, Kelly T, Sterling J.C. Soft tissue injuries to USA paralympians at the 1996 summer games. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2000;81:368–73. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(00)90086-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ozguven H.N, Berme N. An experimental and analytical study of impact forces during human jumping. J. Biomech. 1988;21:1061–6. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(88)90252-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Patatoukas D, Farmakides A, Aggeli V, Fotaki S, Tsibidakis H, Mavrogenis A.F, Papathanasiou J, Papagelopoulos P.J. Disability-related injuries in athletes with disabilities. Folia Med. (Plovdiv) 2011;53:40–6. doi: 10.2478/v10153-010-0026-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Peterson L, Junge A, Chomiak J, Graf-Baumann T, Dvorak J. Incidence of football injuries and complaints in different age groups and skill-level groups. Am. J. Sports Med. 2000;28:S51–7. doi: 10.1177/28.suppl_5.s-51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Pribut S. Overuse Injuries of Tendon and Bone: All the Small Things. Podiatry Manag. 2010:157–74. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Reiser R.F, Rocheford E.C, Armstrong C.J. Building a better understanding of basic mechanical principles through analysis of the vertical jump. Strength & Conditioning Journal. 2006;28:70–80. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rojano D, Rodríguez E, Berral de la Rosa F.J. Analysis of the vertical ground reaction forces and temporal factors in the landing phase of a countermovement jump. J. Sports Sci. Med. 2010;9:282–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ross S.E, Guskiewicz K. Time to stabilization: a method for analyzing dynamic postural stability. Athletic Therapy Today. 2003;8:37–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ross S.E, Guskiewicz K.M. Examination of static and dynamic postural stability in individuals with functionally stable and unstable ankles. Clin. J. Sport Med. 2004;14:332–8. doi: 10.1097/00042752-200411000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Salaj S, Markovic G. Specificity of jumping, sprinting, and quick change-of- direction motor abilities. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2011;25:1249–55. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181da77df. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Santello M. Review of motor control mechanisms underlying impact absorption from falls. Gait Posture. 2005;21:85–94. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Schot P.K, Bates B.T, Dufek J.S. Bilateral performance symmetry during drop landing: a kinetic analysis. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 1994;26:1153–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Seegmiller J, McCaw S. Ground reaction forces among gymnasts and recreational athletes in drop landings. Journal of Athletic Training. 2003;38:311–4. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Self B.P, Paine D. Ankle biomechanics during four landing techniques. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2001;33:1338–44. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200108000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Walden M, Hagglund M, Ekstrand J. UEFA Champions League study: a prospective study of injuries in professional football during the 2001-2002 season. Br. J. Sports Med. 2005;39:542–6. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2004.014571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Weightman D.L, Browne R.C. Injuries in eleven selected sports. J. Sports Med. 1975:136–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wong P, Hong Y. Soccer injury in the lower extremities. Br. J. Sports Med. 2005;39:473–82. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2004.015511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Yde J, Nielsen A.B. Sports injuries in adolescents’ ball games: soccer, handball and basketball. Br. J. Sports Med. 1990;24:51–4. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.24.1.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zhang S.N, Bates B.T, Dufek J.S. Contributions of lower extremity joints to energy dissipation during landings. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2000;32:812–9. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200004000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biology of sport are provided here courtesy of Institute of Sport

RESOURCES