Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1995 Sep 1;14(17):4374–4383. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00112.x

Identification and characterization of a pre-cleavage synaptic complex that is an early intermediate in Tn10 transposition.

J Sakai 1, R M Chalmers 1, N Kleckner 1
PMCID: PMC394522  PMID: 7556079

Abstract

The Tn10 transposition reaction has been reconstituted in vitro on short linear substrate fragments encoding transposon ends. This permits the direct detection of protein-DNA complexes formed during transposition by gel retardation analysis. We demonstrate that a stable synaptic complex containing transposase and a pair of transposon ends forms rapidly and efficiently, prior and prerequisite to the double-strand cleavages involved in transposon excision. These observations extend the general analogies between the Tn10 and Mu transposition reactions, and also reveal significant differences between the two cases. The speed and simplicity of synaptic complex formation in the Tn10/IS10 reaction is suitable for a modular insertion sequence. In contrast, the relative slowness and complexity of this process in the Mu is necessary to permit transposition immunity and control of transposition by Mu repressor protein, two features specifically important for a temperate bacteriophage. Further dissection of the reaction leads to a tentative working model for events preceding the first double-strand cleavage.

Full text

PDF
4374

Images in this article

4375Image
on p.4375
4375Image
on p.4375
4376Image
on p.4376
4376Image
on p.4376
4377Image
on p.4377
4378Image
on p.4378
4378Image
on p.4378
4379Image
on p.4379

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adzuma K., Mizuuchi K. Target immunity of Mu transposition reflects a differential distribution of Mu B protein. Cell. 1988 Apr 22;53(2):257–266. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90387-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bainton R. J., Kubo K. M., Feng J. N., Craig N. L. Tn7 transposition: target DNA recognition is mediated by multiple Tn7-encoded proteins in a purified in vitro system. Cell. 1993 Mar 26;72(6):931–943. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90581-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bainton R., Gamas P., Craig N. L. Tn7 transposition in vitro proceeds through an excised transposon intermediate generated by staggered breaks in DNA. Cell. 1991 May 31;65(5):805–816. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90388-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker T. A., Mizuuchi K. DNA-promoted assembly of the active tetramer of the Mu transposase. Genes Dev. 1992 Nov;6(11):2221–2232. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.11.2221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baker T. A., Mizuuchi M., Savilahti H., Mizuuchi K. Division of labor among monomers within the Mu transposase tetramer. Cell. 1993 Aug 27;74(4):723–733. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90519-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bender J., Kleckner N. Genetic evidence that Tn10 transposes by a nonreplicative mechanism. Cell. 1986 Jun 20;45(6):801–815. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90555-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bender J., Kleckner N. Tn10 insertion specificity is strongly dependent upon sequences immediately adjacent to the target-site consensus sequence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Sep 1;89(17):7996–8000. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.17.7996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Benjamin H. W., Kleckner N. Excision of Tn10 from the donor site during transposition occurs by flush double-strand cleavages at the transposon termini. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 May 15;89(10):4648–4652. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.10.4648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Benjamin H. W., Kleckner N. Intramolecular transposition by Tn10. Cell. 1989 Oct 20;59(2):373–383. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90298-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bushman F. D., Fujiwara T., Craigie R. Retroviral DNA integration directed by HIV integration protein in vitro. Science. 1990 Sep 28;249(4976):1555–1558. doi: 10.1126/science.2171144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chalmers R. M., Kleckner N. Tn10/IS10 transposase purification, activation, and in vitro reaction. J Biol Chem. 1994 Mar 18;269(11):8029–8035. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Craigie R., Fujiwara T., Bushman F. The IN protein of Moloney murine leukemia virus processes the viral DNA ends and accomplishes their integration in vitro. Cell. 1990 Aug 24;62(4):829–837. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90126-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Craigie R., Mizuuchi K. Transposition of Mu DNA: joining of Mu to target DNA can be uncoupled from cleavage at the ends of Mu. Cell. 1987 Nov 6;51(3):493–501. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90645-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Craigie R., Mizuuchi M., Mizuuchi K. Site-specific recognition of the bacteriophage Mu ends by the Mu A protein. Cell. 1984 Dec;39(2 Pt 1):387–394. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90017-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Darzins A., Kent N. E., Buckwalter M. S., Casadaban M. J. Bacteriophage Mu sites required for transposition immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Sep;85(18):6826–6830. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.18.6826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Derbyshire K. M., Grindley N. D. Binding of the IS903 transposase to its inverted repeat in vitro. EMBO J. 1992 Sep;11(9):3449–3455. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05424.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Engelman A., Mizuuchi K., Craigie R. HIV-1 DNA integration: mechanism of viral DNA cleavage and DNA strand transfer. Cell. 1991 Dec 20;67(6):1211–1221. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90297-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Escoubas J. M., Prère M. F., Fayet O., Salvignol I., Galas D., Zerbib D., Chandler M. Translational control of transposition activity of the bacterial insertion sequence IS1. EMBO J. 1991 Mar;10(3):705–712. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb08000.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Goto N., Mochizuki A., Inagaki Y., Horiuchi S., Tanaka T., Nakaya R. Identification of the DNA sequence required for transposition immunity of the gamma delta sequence. J Bacteriol. 1987 Sep;169(9):4388–4390. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.9.4388-4390.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Halling S. M., Kleckner N. A symmetrical six-base-pair target site sequence determines Tn10 insertion specificity. Cell. 1982 Jan;28(1):155–163. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90385-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Haniford D. B., Benjamin H. W., Kleckner N. Kinetic and structural analysis of a cleaved donor intermediate and a strand transfer intermediate in Tn10 transposition. Cell. 1991 Jan 11;64(1):171–179. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90218-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Haniford D. B., Chaconas G. Mechanistic aspects of DNA transposition. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1992 Oct;2(5):698–704. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(05)80129-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Haniford D. B., Chelouche A. R., Kleckner N. A specific class of IS10 transposase mutants are blocked for target site interactions and promote formation of an excised transposon fragment. Cell. 1989 Oct 20;59(2):385–394. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90299-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Huisman O., Errada P. R., Signon L., Kleckner N. Mutational analysis of IS10's outside end. EMBO J. 1989 Jul;8(7):2101–2109. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03619.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kleckner N., Steele D. A., Reichardt K., Botstein D. Specificity of insertion by the translocatable tetracycline-resistance element Tn10. Genetics. 1979 Aug;92(4):1023–1040. doi: 10.1093/genetics/92.4.1023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Leung P. C., Teplow D. B., Harshey R. M. Interaction of distinct domains in Mu transposase with Mu DNA ends and an internal transpositional enhancer. Nature. 1989 Apr 20;338(6217):656–658. doi: 10.1038/338656a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mizuuchi K., Adzuma K. Inversion of the phosphate chirality at the target site of Mu DNA strand transfer: evidence for a one-step transesterification mechanism. Cell. 1991 Jul 12;66(1):129–140. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90145-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mizuuchi M., Baker T. A., Mizuuchi K. Assembly of the active form of the transposase-Mu DNA complex: a critical control point in Mu transposition. Cell. 1992 Jul 24;70(2):303–311. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90104-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mizuuchi M., Mizuuchi K. Efficient Mu transposition requires interaction of transposase with a DNA sequence at the Mu operator: implications for regulation. Cell. 1989 Jul 28;58(2):399–408. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90854-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Morisato D., Kleckner N. Tn10 transposition and circle formation in vitro. Cell. 1987 Oct 9;51(1):101–111. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90014-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Myers R. M., Lerman L. S., Maniatis T. A general method for saturation mutagenesis of cloned DNA fragments. Science. 1985 Jul 19;229(4710):242–247. doi: 10.1126/science.2990046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Nash H. A., Robertson C. A., Flamm E., Weisberg R. A., Miller H. I. Overproduction of Escherichia coli integration host factor, a protein with nonidentical subunits. J Bacteriol. 1987 Sep;169(9):4124–4127. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.9.4124-4127.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Padmore R., Cao L., Kleckner N. Temporal comparison of recombination and synaptonemal complex formation during meiosis in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1991 Sep 20;66(6):1239–1256. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90046-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Pato M. L., Howe M. M., Higgins N. P. A DNA gyrase-binding site at the center of the bacteriophage Mu genome is required for efficient replicative transposition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Nov;87(22):8716–8720. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.22.8716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Roberts D., Hoopes B. C., McClure W. R., Kleckner N. IS10 transposition is regulated by DNA adenine methylation. Cell. 1985 Nov;43(1):117–130. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90017-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Roth M. J., Tanese N., Goff S. P. Gene product of Moloney murine leukemia virus required for proviral integration is a DNA-binding protein. J Mol Biol. 1988 Sep 5;203(1):131–139. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90097-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Signon L., Kleckner N. Negative and positive regulation of Tn10/IS10-promoted recombination by IHF: two distinguishable processes inhibit transposition off of multicopy plasmid replicons and activate chromosomal events that favor evolution of new transposons. Genes Dev. 1995 May 1;9(9):1123–1136. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.9.1123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Surette M. G., Buch S. J., Chaconas G. Transpososomes: stable protein-DNA complexes involved in the in vitro transposition of bacteriophage Mu DNA. Cell. 1987 Apr 24;49(2):253–262. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90566-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Surette M. G., Chaconas G. The Mu transpositional enhancer can function in trans: requirement of the enhancer for synapsis but not strand cleavage. Cell. 1992 Mar 20;68(6):1101–1108. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90081-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wiater L. A., Grindley N. D. Gamma delta transposase. Purification and analysis of its interaction with a transposon end. J Biol Chem. 1991 Jan 25;266(3):1841–1849. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wiegand T. W., Reznikoff W. S. Interaction of Tn5 transposase with the transposon termini. J Mol Biol. 1994 Jan 14;235(2):486–495. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES